Playing devil's advocate and approaching this from the opposite end of the spectrum, what if concealed single round derringers were treated more lightly under the law, would a private citizen be more likely to be armed and able to intercede in mass killings? I could live with a 12 round limitation on pistol magazines and a 16-20 round limitation on rifle magazines.
Although limiting the magazine capacity of a weapon generally sounds like a good idea there are problems. On a pistol when the magazine hold more than about 12 rounds it protrudes from the gun, is obtrusive and affects the balance of the weapon, so minor limitations are something I would comply with regardless. The government which suffers from chronic incompetence would take a good idea too for and have us all with 6 round magazines that defeat the purpose of having a semi auto in the 1st place
It's not the gun its the person who uses it. I could stab someone in the head right now with a fucking pencil, should we ban pencils? THIS BITCH DOESN'T MENTION THE CONSTITUTION! Fucking cunt
he changed his mag and he had a mag malfunction and thats how they subdued the shooter....and the anti gun guy just keeps yelling trying to make his point through aggression...
So long as you don't kill no more than 10 people it is appropriate. If we allow them to set a cap on ammunition they will not stop till all guns are banned.
If we ban cheeseburgers which have 800 calories instead of 700 calories we might save a few lives too. Anecdotal arguments like this are just stupid. Crazy people will still get their hands on big guns while adding yet another restriction to the freedoms of ordinary citizens. (I don't even own a gun or have a desire to).
Ill say it one more time and slowly so you can understand me... Gun laws only hurt law abiding citizens. Whether its the law or not( mag cap) if he wanted to get a 30 round mag he could. Drugs are illigeal in this country and if wanted some of those i could get some really quick. By the way ITS NOT A CLIP. Your talking out the wrong hole.
i cant say it enough limit the mags to 10 rounds and he would have just brought 3 10 rounders. it takes a second to change a mag so whether it was 3 10 round magazines or 1 30 round magazine the same amount of people would have died.
@FranzAntonMesmer your retarded they get there money from memberships by law abiding citizens.... and she is just a run of the mill anti gun control advocate who thinks fewer gun in citizens hands will limit crime from criminals who get theres illegally.....
What part of shall not be infringed, does this bitch not understand. She needs to shut her cock sucker, and stuff a huge throbbing dick in her mouth like a good little girl.
Didn't someone grab his mag while he was attempting to reload? It's allot easier to grab a 33rd. mag from someone than a little 10 rnd mag. Did the 10 rnd. law under Clinton have any effect at all? Has a 33rnd mag ever been used in a crime before? Using this logic, and no doubt, Maddow wants to ban guns a little at a time, everytime a weapon is used in a crime, it should be banned.
Cheney is close to talking to his maker and he knows it. Men tend to get strange at that time. I will share a video on the Clinton ban and what it accomplished....
who cares about this fool, she has no Audience anyway. it has nothing to do with the NRA. the bill of rights of the US are “inalienable rights“, and not open to debate by fools like this.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”!!!!!!!!!!!
If you ban 30 round clips... then they will want to ban you from owning 3 guns with 10 bullets in the clip... and then they will want to make guns only fire one bullet which only fires after you pass an ink blot psych test.
The 2nd amendment says there can be NO laws about guns. The words if, but, or & unless are nowhere in that amendment. If everyone in this country carried, Jared Loughner would have been stopped after the 1st shot. The questioner asks "Do you wish he had been stopped after 10 shots?" My answer is that I wish he had been stopped after 1 shot.
Perhaps the reason why extended magazines exist is because the American civilians need to be able to have at least something close to the capacity that the military has. Civilians should have the ability to at least believe they can defend themselves from an out of control government. With the technological advances over the years the military has access to weapons that are so advanced that most people would think it was science fiction even if they saw the weapons in use.
I couldn't even watch this. The way they try to trap people and twist their words with faulty arguments angers me. And for the record, CATO libertarians are not libertarians at all. The Koch brothers and their band of neo-cons are souring the name. My Inner authortarian wants to ban main-stream media...but I know that it's wrong to ban anything in a free society. I just wish these news pundits would all lose their jobs. The world would be a better place without them.
....Making laws to restrict the rounds in a magazine does nothing to the criminals who can purchase illegally what they want when they want. Seeing as how that moron reporter likes re "what if" and "do you wish" games, WHAT IF that psycho was a better aim. 10-15 rounds accurately versus 31 rounds sprayed. Hmmm. Leave the rights alone and take a long hard look at th decaying society here in America. Address more of the WHYs and not the HOWs.
Meddows spun this very well. Both reporters are spewing th bullsh!t thy are told to. Kudos to re Congressman for standing their grounds. Remember America, when thy change laws affecting gun laws they only inhibit the law abiding citizens. Criminals don't follow laws, duhhhhh. The 2nd Amendment is there to protect the people from Government, not from each other. It's up to you to defend yourself and your family. The Second Amendment DOES protect the individual's rights....
Next thing you know they'll be coming for your guns.
We need no debate at all about our gun rights. The minute they come for the guns the 2nd Revolutionary War starts. Subverting the Constitution in any way is an act of Treason!
Playing devil's advocate and approaching this from the opposite end of the spectrum, what if concealed single round derringers were treated more lightly under the law, would a private citizen be more likely to be armed and able to intercede in mass killings? I could live with a 12 round limitation on pistol magazines and a 16-20 round limitation on rifle magazines.
Zyworski 2 months ago
Although limiting the magazine capacity of a weapon generally sounds like a good idea there are problems. On a pistol when the magazine hold more than about 12 rounds it protrudes from the gun, is obtrusive and affects the balance of the weapon, so minor limitations are something I would comply with regardless. The government which suffers from chronic incompetence would take a good idea too for and have us all with 6 round magazines that defeat the purpose of having a semi auto in the 1st place
Zyworski 2 months ago
Bullshit at 1:55! Even during the ban it was still possible to buy grandfathered in high cap magazines. They just cost more.
Tm0g762 5 months ago
It's not the gun its the person who uses it. I could stab someone in the head right now with a fucking pencil, should we ban pencils? THIS BITCH DOESN'T MENTION THE CONSTITUTION! Fucking cunt
DEGAUSS138 6 months ago
You can make a 60rd magazine with 6 ten rounders taped together after simply modifying five of them.
mlke4258 6 months ago
this bitch blaming the nra.
mariojseverino 8 months ago
Dick Cheney is a statist asshole.
rambone5 10 months ago
he changed his mag and he had a mag malfunction and thats how they subdued the shooter....and the anti gun guy just keeps yelling trying to make his point through aggression...
deltaxxzero 10 months ago
So long as you don't kill no more than 10 people it is appropriate. If we allow them to set a cap on ammunition they will not stop till all guns are banned.
smokescreen767 10 months ago
MSNBC is a dumping ground for media Kunts that wear their asses for hats.
Gmissile 10 months ago
If we ban cheeseburgers which have 800 calories instead of 700 calories we might save a few lives too. Anecdotal arguments like this are just stupid. Crazy people will still get their hands on big guns while adding yet another restriction to the freedoms of ordinary citizens. (I don't even own a gun or have a desire to).
Ormaaj 11 months ago
Ill say it one more time and slowly so you can understand me... Gun laws only hurt law abiding citizens. Whether its the law or not( mag cap) if he wanted to get a 30 round mag he could. Drugs are illigeal in this country and if wanted some of those i could get some really quick. By the way ITS NOT A CLIP. Your talking out the wrong hole.
ChefDevo1 11 months ago
i cant say it enough limit the mags to 10 rounds and he would have just brought 3 10 rounders. it takes a second to change a mag so whether it was 3 10 round magazines or 1 30 round magazine the same amount of people would have died.
StetsonXD 1 year ago
If wasn't for the NRA criminals couldn't get guns. Where you you think they get there money? She is soooo right. Thanks for posting this.
FranzAntonMesmer 1 year ago
@FranzAntonMesmer your retarded they get there money from memberships by law abiding citizens.... and she is just a run of the mill anti gun control advocate who thinks fewer gun in citizens hands will limit crime from criminals who get theres illegally.....
deltaxxzero 10 months ago
@FranzAntonMesmer You're fucking retarded.
KalashnikovKid762 8 months ago
If wasn't for the NRA criminals couldn't get guns. Where you you think they get there money?
FranzAntonMesmer 1 year ago
@FranzAntonMesmer
That ass on your pointy head looks good, on you.
Gmissile 10 months ago
Mr Maddow thinks hes a woman, and doesnt know the difference between a clip and a magazine.
arridedry 1 year ago
Maybe they should cut Maddow's show from 30 minutes to 10 inutes and she couldn't spew as much crap!
slg1373 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bitch, what you think is not the last word. If you don't like freedom, get the fuck out of this country.
1989JCH 1 year ago
What part of shall not be infringed, does this bitch not understand. She needs to shut her cock sucker, and stuff a huge throbbing dick in her mouth like a good little girl.
1989JCH 1 year ago
@1989JCH
She's a glaring example of the dangers of Carpet Munching.
It'd more likely get on a rocket ship to Mars,rather than give a BJ.
The male Kunt,and the rest of the MSNBC shit spewers, are the reason their ratings are in the toilet.
Gmissile 10 months ago
Cheney is a bitch. He does not need a gun, he may shoot someone.
1989JCH 1 year ago
Didn't someone grab his mag while he was attempting to reload? It's allot easier to grab a 33rd. mag from someone than a little 10 rnd mag. Did the 10 rnd. law under Clinton have any effect at all? Has a 33rnd mag ever been used in a crime before? Using this logic, and no doubt, Maddow wants to ban guns a little at a time, everytime a weapon is used in a crime, it should be banned.
unicornlxi 1 year ago
You can change clips in less than 1 second
jjrglobal 1 year ago
It takes me literally 3 seconds to reload my glock.
MikaOwns 1 year ago
Dick Cheney has absolutely no business talking about gun safety. Does no one remember that he had an accidental discharge that almost killed a man?
WunderDoob 1 year ago
Cheney is close to talking to his maker and he knows it. Men tend to get strange at that time. I will share a video on the Clinton ban and what it accomplished....
stetsonwalker 1 year ago
i wish that everyone in that room had a gun so that they would have shot him right away
bheath081 1 year ago
@itchyundies LOLOL
jasonbruneck 1 year ago
hey cheney catch a hart attack
jasonbruneck 1 year ago
If the hero on the streets had guns, he probably would have only unloaded 2 bullets at best.
codematrix 1 year ago
hey cheney maybe its time you go fuck a hat
fukkuutube 1 year ago
who cares about this fool, she has no Audience anyway. it has nothing to do with the NRA. the bill of rights of the US are “inalienable rights“, and not open to debate by fools like this.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”!!!!!!!!!!!
phantomcharger 1 year ago
I hope the next armed lunatic who goes crazy finds himself with a loaded extended magazine in Rachel Madow's studio.
magichandpuppet 1 year ago 3
If you ban 30 round clips... then they will want to ban you from owning 3 guns with 10 bullets in the clip... and then they will want to make guns only fire one bullet which only fires after you pass an ink blot psych test.
HolisticPlantHealth 1 year ago
@itchyundies LOL
xeena67 1 year ago
why should my freedom be restricted when I did nothing wrong, because some nutjob abuses his freedom.
jserj 1 year ago
well dick cheny is a traitor but what's new
DixiePrepper 1 year ago
The 2nd amendment says there can be NO laws about guns. The words if, but, or & unless are nowhere in that amendment. If everyone in this country carried, Jared Loughner would have been stopped after the 1st shot. The questioner asks "Do you wish he had been stopped after 10 shots?" My answer is that I wish he had been stopped after 1 shot.
americangamefowl 1 year ago
When is MADDCOW going off the air???
Livefreerevolution 1 year ago 8
Perhaps the reason why extended magazines exist is because the American civilians need to be able to have at least something close to the capacity that the military has. Civilians should have the ability to at least believe they can defend themselves from an out of control government. With the technological advances over the years the military has access to weapons that are so advanced that most people would think it was science fiction even if they saw the weapons in use.
TheTruthNothinMore 1 year ago
Maybe it's appropriate to kick Cheney's criminal fucking teeth in.
Mauhadeeb28 1 year ago
I couldn't even watch this. The way they try to trap people and twist their words with faulty arguments angers me. And for the record, CATO libertarians are not libertarians at all. The Koch brothers and their band of neo-cons are souring the name. My Inner authortarian wants to ban main-stream media...but I know that it's wrong to ban anything in a free society. I just wish these news pundits would all lose their jobs. The world would be a better place without them.
renegade2142 1 year ago
....Making laws to restrict the rounds in a magazine does nothing to the criminals who can purchase illegally what they want when they want. Seeing as how that moron reporter likes re "what if" and "do you wish" games, WHAT IF that psycho was a better aim. 10-15 rounds accurately versus 31 rounds sprayed. Hmmm. Leave the rights alone and take a long hard look at th decaying society here in America. Address more of the WHYs and not the HOWs.
tmcstevethomas 1 year ago
Meddows spun this very well. Both reporters are spewing th bullsh!t thy are told to. Kudos to re Congressman for standing their grounds. Remember America, when thy change laws affecting gun laws they only inhibit the law abiding citizens. Criminals don't follow laws, duhhhhh. The 2nd Amendment is there to protect the people from Government, not from each other. It's up to you to defend yourself and your family. The Second Amendment DOES protect the individual's rights....
tmcstevethomas 1 year ago
Next thing you know they'll be coming for your guns.
We need no debate at all about our gun rights. The minute they come for the guns the 2nd Revolutionary War starts. Subverting the Constitution in any way is an act of Treason!
im1greatman 1 year ago
Load and angry is a sign that some one is about to unload their mag.
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago
Magazines? IM belt feed!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago 8