im just wondering...why would the governments hold this from us? i mean besides that it will kina kill religions(thank goodness),other than that,theyll just be doing 50% of us a great favor
im positive that no candidate is better suited for presidency than the other, since the shadow government is in full control of any president no matter who it is.
I think that he may simply not know... yet. What he has demonstrated in this video is that he knew the right answer that would appeal to the audience at the time. He sided with "the rest of us". The cover up is ending soon though. So it soon won't matter.
The fact is that this country and the world is not equipped to feed the 7+ billion people we have, let alone if we keep reproducing like this. This world is secretly counting on "outside" help with the energy (and therefore food) crisis. 2017
But NWO or what ever many organisations has the power and knowledge about this. Wouldn't let him to know about this. just Beacuse the highly believe that he proberly then will let it out, if many ask for it.
Simple equations, sad for the rest of humanity.
I really hope im wrong here, i really do. But people are pretty smart, and can hold this for years if it will have to.
are you serious? dont you think if the government has information on ufos you should have a right to know? and who the fuck are you people wanting the government to have secrets? you have every right to your personal opinion but please do other people a favor a read a book or maybe even research what you are talking about.
Spacecab1, altough I understand your point of view, you should think farther: Current isolation from (possible) advanced ETT and knowledge about exobiologic species allows humanity to evolve on their own from a type 0 to 1 civil. Prematured confrontation would lead to self-extinction of humanity by cruel
wars for resourses due to overpopulation, collapse of social and economic stability, etc. - just for satisfaction of curiousity?
listen man i understand that but if people want the information bad enough they could get it. how hard is it to fake being a good person to get inside? the problem is people thinking the government has a right to have secrets and thats not the case. in america our government was set up to protect americans freedom not control us or hide information. in doing so they have set up a country just like stalin or nazi germany. the us government wasnt about having secrets until the 40s either.
1. Spacecab1, as I suggested in an earlier post, either you have to elect other presidents, or you have to change cititzenship, if you are not satisfied with your govt. However, my personal opinion is, if official ET contacts existed, than ALL GOVTS OF THE WORLD are bound to a kind of UN-resolution (or whatever else) to keep that delicate thing secret. Experience learned us, that Americans suffer from secrecy incontinence, so they can't keep secrets for a long time.
A government indeed can and do have secrets legally, whenever national/international security is involved. Social and economic stability IS a matter of national security.
Note, that USAF spent over 75 millions of taxpayers dollars for co-authoring/sponsoring Stargate SG-1. I think, they used the 'SF' show to limit the said damage and tell people about things, they never can do officially.
(A sort of anti-disclosure project) You'll see, the matter is serious. Deadly serious.
secrets will get us americans killed by people that want to know and will do anything to know why not make it public information so people of america are informed and can also handle the situations that come from the knowledge. the government of america is acting like a communist one and is getting far from the america it was and obama isnt going to help people learn how to take care of themselves by making more social programs. people need to learn how to depend on themselves.
I agree, many people of course could handle truth. But not all. And here starts the big problem: Who shall decide in a democracy, who is allowed to know and who not? How could a govt make shure, really dangerous technology (a wrote about!) is kept secret from e.g. terrorists?
I simply conclude, if I can provide such
technologies, extraterrestrials could even do it magnitudes better. Hence secrecy is the one and only way, to make shure, we can live
Unfortunately, I can't tell you, how aliens handle information between themselves. However, we can be pretty shure, that aliens
(if existed) share my opinion about non-disclosure of themselves and their technology to humanity, until we'll have evolved into a type 1 civil. Otherwise, an unambigous public
appearance in front of CNN TV-cams had taken place. It haven't happened yet.
Spacecab1, you are definitivly wrong here. Govt of your country had even secrets e.g. in independence war, or during WWII. E.g. Manhattan project (construction of first atomic bomb) was highly classified. Until
Hiroshima, nobody knew something about.
However, a nuclear bomb is a toy against dangers, a prematured disclosure of ETT could pose to humanity. Hence if the ET stuff were
real, ALL govts of the world and ALL ET races
HAVE TO play the same (secrecy) game. I think, they do it. ;-))
be a man and think do you want a person that understands how to keep the governemnt functioning without increasing taxes while your wages drop or do you want a man to tell you the answer to poverty is taxing the globe which would start a world government and destroy the constitution and your rights. start thinking and stop letting them do it for you.
Anyone who hasn't seen "The Money Masters" is missing a vital piece of the puzzle. Once you have seen it, a lot of things begin to fall into place. Web site: themoneymasters dot com.
I donno. He could have told the UFO faithfull that he would investigate just to get their vote like Bill Clinton did, then don't do anything at all. Hush Hush. All he did change the topic given to him. Focus. Is this your idea of sharpness?
be realistic...the whole UFO idea is absurd and anyone believing in flying saucers is perceived as that as well...so yes this is my idea of sharp because in reality...that IS what a politician should care about...people on Earth rather than martians on Mars.
looks like someone been reading the bible to study the stars. and yes mykol is right all he did was change the subject to pitch himself and tell you how much money we need to spend in order to fix things the man thinks spending money solves problems but what did biggie tell us? mo money, mo problems
I agree. But if you really knew your stuff, you'd understand that there are a whole lot of options between outright capitalism and socialism, and that none of the democratic candidates are anywhere near being socialists. Just because one supports the legacy of FDR and supports some programs - like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and soon Universal Healthcare - it doesn't nearly make them socialist.
The flaw in your "individual responsibility" argument which republicans have made for decades is that it wrongly assumes that everyone starts life at the same point and is born into the same advantages. Finally, something else they don't teach you is that efficiency is not the only thing that matters in society and should lead our policies.
If you think all candidates except Paul is Socialist, then I rest my case; His slogan is "elect me, so I can sit there and do nothing." your definition of socialism is more loose than anything I have heard. Adam Smith's free market system is about paying individuals based on the level of their productivity.
But based on no economic standard is Warren Buffet - who made 46 million dollars last year - has contributed 100 times more to the economy than I have working in a key policy position in a think-tank in Washington DC 60 hours a week making about 45k.
Yeah, and ironically he thinks he doesn't pay enough taxes! He thinks the tax structures favors the wealthy! Go figure! That should be a big wake up call to "markets decide all" people that the wealthy owe the most to society because they benefit the most!
Government intervention is necessary, because the realities of our society and lack of perfect knowledge is resulting in certain segments of society not to get compensated based on their contribution, but also based on their color, social status, family name and wealth they are born into.
"Its still your choice to sit at home or go to work, but i dont feel i should pay taxes to support those who cannot be bothered."
Seriously? are you joking or do you actually believe the people who rely on social security are lazy? how about the 33% of the people in the country who lost their jobs after the Great Depression? Were they lazy too? Were you joking when you said you were studying economics? Have you read about Keynes yet?
You call it "subsidise the poor," I call it giving the working under-compensated members of our society a hand up to make it. And the great depression was a perfect example of how economy can fail working people.
you call taxes "steal"ing from the rich when they themselves agree to be a part of the human-made economic structure? If you are playing a game of monopoly or poker and end up having to give some money to another player based on the rules of the game, you call that stealing too? And when you abolish income taxes, it is the rich who are benefiting most from it because they are the ones whose incomes are sometimes already over a thousand times what the average hard-working worder pays.
life isnt a game like poker or monopoly now is it? and most people born in america never got a choice to decide if they wanted to play or not. your taxes go to fund wars and weapons that never see the light of day. billions are spent annually to make new weapons that never happen and it has been this way since WW2. taxes hasnt solved anything it has only open politics to crooks and thieves or have you forgot who richard nixon was? stop letting them think for you and think for yourself for once.
spacecab1 you think too much. You have to pay taxes and you have to die for your country, if your political leaders, you elected, want it. You should keep your government in high
esteem. They spend billions of dollars to protect you from every physical and mental threat, that might you prevent from paying taxes. ;-))
not really see what most people forget is the fact americans can revolt and the government cant really stop it since the constitution was designed so if politicians were corrupt and not listening to the citizens we could take back control. and who is gonna stop the citizens from revolting all the armed forces are busy at the moment in iraq
The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting. - Charles Bukowski
The rich often gets overcompensated because contrary to Adam Smith's perfect world, markets are irrational; they don't just reward productivity and efficiency, but also race, gender, family name and a whole lot of other factors that have no impact on improving the lives of anyone in the economy.
The truth is that the traditional macroeconomic model of free economies does not allow it to collapse. In reality, however, free economies can and do experience market failure, and, even more often, individuals are failed by the market. Economists do a much worse job of modeling reality than many think. The set of foundational assumptions for economics doesn't allow it to represent the true situation.
im just wondering...why would the governments hold this from us? i mean besides that it will kina kill religions(thank goodness),other than that,theyll just be doing 50% of us a great favor
twisted709 3 years ago 4
yeah but does obama know? who knows if the presidents arent just the puppets?
i sure as hell dont know,mabe aliens have visited us,gosh maybe aliens created us,but we just dont know...so ill go with his answer for now
twisted709 3 years ago 3
Get the 'E' back in monkey more like. If you are going to insult someone learn how to spell at least.
dacezza 3 years ago 2
good
delsur2009 3 years ago
at least hes being ohnest, other presidents are like NO NO NO
actor123456789 3 years ago 8
I am sorry for Americans that they do not have 1 hunest man in thier land! not even 1
Gsharpminr 3 years ago
I disagree. I am the one.
PathoftheStrong 3 years ago
Yeah, I'm another one....
TwiztedAnimator 3 years ago 5
Fact/Fiction:
1) Ufos
2) Global Warming
3) 9/11 cover-up
4) USA going bankrupt
Only Global Warming (and what we can do to prevent it - yes we can!) has been taken seriously in the debates. So it must be a matter of fact...
Judas36 3 years ago
0:42 "There may be some other folks on their way"
What is that supposed to mean?
an420324 3 years ago 4
youre looking too much into it; obamas obviously being funny.
ZzarezZ 3 years ago 3
im positive that no candidate is better suited for presidency than the other, since the shadow government is in full control of any president no matter who it is.
lose/lose...
dmix09 3 years ago 2
amen
nonikas87 3 years ago
obama is part of ufo coverup
kellooo 3 years ago 3
I think that he may simply not know... yet. What he has demonstrated in this video is that he knew the right answer that would appeal to the audience at the time. He sided with "the rest of us". The cover up is ending soon though. So it soon won't matter.
The fact is that this country and the world is not equipped to feed the 7+ billion people we have, let alone if we keep reproducing like this. This world is secretly counting on "outside" help with the energy (and therefore food) crisis. 2017
purplenoise2002 3 years ago 7
i could agree with some of that.
But NWO or what ever many organisations has the power and knowledge about this. Wouldn't let him to know about this. just Beacuse the highly believe that he proberly then will let it out, if many ask for it.
Simple equations, sad for the rest of humanity.
I really hope im wrong here, i really do. But people are pretty smart, and can hold this for years if it will have to.
spand3244 3 years ago
a few days ago i thought i read the dumbest comment on youtube today sir you beat it. congratulations on being a moron.
spacecab1 3 years ago
I think Obabma will be the right next president. He seems to be determined to end the crazy public discussions about UFOs too.
What Bill Clinton did (declassification of UFO files) was desastrous for the country. Today many people distrust in NASA and other
governmental organisations. I think, Obama
will distract peoples interesst by strenghtening secrecy on the topic.
sacha4you 3 years ago
are you serious? dont you think if the government has information on ufos you should have a right to know? and who the fuck are you people wanting the government to have secrets? you have every right to your personal opinion but please do other people a favor a read a book or maybe even research what you are talking about.
spacecab1 3 years ago
Spacecab1, altough I understand your point of view, you should think farther: Current isolation from (possible) advanced ETT and knowledge about exobiologic species allows humanity to evolve on their own from a type 0 to 1 civil. Prematured confrontation would lead to self-extinction of humanity by cruel
wars for resourses due to overpopulation, collapse of social and economic stability, etc. - just for satisfaction of curiousity?
Watch Stargate SG-1 'Colson'. All answers are
there. ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
listen man i understand that but if people want the information bad enough they could get it. how hard is it to fake being a good person to get inside? the problem is people thinking the government has a right to have secrets and thats not the case. in america our government was set up to protect americans freedom not control us or hide information. in doing so they have set up a country just like stalin or nazi germany. the us government wasnt about having secrets until the 40s either.
spacecab1 3 years ago
1. Spacecab1, as I suggested in an earlier post, either you have to elect other presidents, or you have to change cititzenship, if you are not satisfied with your govt. However, my personal opinion is, if official ET contacts existed, than ALL GOVTS OF THE WORLD are bound to a kind of UN-resolution (or whatever else) to keep that delicate thing secret. Experience learned us, that Americans suffer from secrecy incontinence, so they can't keep secrets for a long time.
sacha4you 3 years ago
2. Now we have the situation, that more information about ET topic is available from
U.S., than from other countries. So I think, there were indeed desperate measures taken by
USAF, when they decided in 1998 to 'take-over'
(aka sponsor and co-author) the Stargate SG-1
'SF' show. Remember, this was the time, when justice forced several agencies to publish UFO files, Greer anounced 'to go public' with
a couple of high ranking wistleblowers, Belgium flap and Phoenix lights appeared, etc.
;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
A government indeed can and do have secrets legally, whenever national/international security is involved. Social and economic stability IS a matter of national security.
Note, that USAF spent over 75 millions of taxpayers dollars for co-authoring/sponsoring Stargate SG-1. I think, they used the 'SF' show to limit the said damage and tell people about things, they never can do officially.
(A sort of anti-disclosure project) You'll see, the matter is serious. Deadly serious.
sacha4you 3 years ago
secrets will get us americans killed by people that want to know and will do anything to know why not make it public information so people of america are informed and can also handle the situations that come from the knowledge. the government of america is acting like a communist one and is getting far from the america it was and obama isnt going to help people learn how to take care of themselves by making more social programs. people need to learn how to depend on themselves.
spacecab1 3 years ago
I agree, many people of course could handle truth. But not all. And here starts the big problem: Who shall decide in a democracy, who is allowed to know and who not? How could a govt make shure, really dangerous technology (a wrote about!) is kept secret from e.g. terrorists?
I simply conclude, if I can provide such
technologies, extraterrestrials could even do it magnitudes better. Hence secrecy is the one and only way, to make shure, we can live
for a while on this planet. Isn't it? ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
im sure aliens cooperate and dont hide information from each other like we do.
spacecab1 3 years ago
Unfortunately, I can't tell you, how aliens handle information between themselves. However, we can be pretty shure, that aliens
(if existed) share my opinion about non-disclosure of themselves and their technology to humanity, until we'll have evolved into a type 1 civil. Otherwise, an unambigous public
appearance in front of CNN TV-cams had taken place. It haven't happened yet.
sacha4you 3 years ago
you can say what you want but i will never agree. secrets destroy confidence in leaders always have and always will just look at nixon and clinton.
spacecab1 3 years ago
Spacecab1, you are definitivly wrong here. Govt of your country had even secrets e.g. in independence war, or during WWII. E.g. Manhattan project (construction of first atomic bomb) was highly classified. Until
Hiroshima, nobody knew something about.
However, a nuclear bomb is a toy against dangers, a prematured disclosure of ETT could pose to humanity. Hence if the ET stuff were
real, ALL govts of the world and ALL ET races
HAVE TO play the same (secrecy) game. I think, they do it. ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
Obama just made it clear that he isn't going to invest in space exploration.
TranCendenZ 3 years ago 2
who ever lukedulude is a retarded. Obama's the shit and the whole nation know's it. stay up pimp
guyman99 4 years ago
be a man and think do you want a person that understands how to keep the governemnt functioning without increasing taxes while your wages drop or do you want a man to tell you the answer to poverty is taxing the globe which would start a world government and destroy the constitution and your rights. start thinking and stop letting them do it for you.
spacecab1 4 years ago
Anyone who hasn't seen "The Money Masters" is missing a vital piece of the puzzle. Once you have seen it, a lot of things begin to fall into place. Web site: themoneymasters dot com.
35mm35 4 years ago
lol...obama's sharp
kaliamalia 4 years ago 2
I donno. He could have told the UFO faithfull that he would investigate just to get their vote like Bill Clinton did, then don't do anything at all. Hush Hush. All he did change the topic given to him. Focus. Is this your idea of sharpness?
mykol13v 4 years ago
be realistic...the whole UFO idea is absurd and anyone believing in flying saucers is perceived as that as well...so yes this is my idea of sharp because in reality...that IS what a politician should care about...people on Earth rather than martians on Mars.
kaliamalia 4 years ago
looks like someone been reading the bible to study the stars. and yes mykol is right all he did was change the subject to pitch himself and tell you how much money we need to spend in order to fix things the man thinks spending money solves problems but what did biggie tell us? mo money, mo problems
spacecab1 4 years ago
I love Obama.
AllisonBookworm 4 years ago
i wouldnt call welfare and socialism intelligent, but thats just because i study economics.
digitised 4 years ago
keep studying.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
free markets and individual responsibility is the way to go
socialism doesnt work, not economicaly nor philosophicaly
digitised 4 years ago
I agree. But if you really knew your stuff, you'd understand that there are a whole lot of options between outright capitalism and socialism, and that none of the democratic candidates are anywhere near being socialists. Just because one supports the legacy of FDR and supports some programs - like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and soon Universal Healthcare - it doesn't nearly make them socialist.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
The flaw in your "individual responsibility" argument which republicans have made for decades is that it wrongly assumes that everyone starts life at the same point and is born into the same advantages. Finally, something else they don't teach you is that efficiency is not the only thing that matters in society and should lead our policies.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
Actually EVERY candidate both republican and democrat (apart from ron paul) is socialist.
They all advocate social responsibility which is the essence of socialism.
You can be 100% lassez faire, but the moment you implement a minumum wage you are officially socialist. The line is far finer than you may realise.
Obama has pages of policies he wants government to enforce on society on his site.
digitised 4 years ago
Everyone should be born with inalienable rights, and be free to make what they want of their lives.
Wealth is the product of your labour, you have every right to keep what you or your family earns.
It is the rich in todays society who are disadvantaged, since they pay the most whilst the unproductive get given the most.
digitised 4 years ago
Efficiency is a matter of self interest, if you want to be rich you have to be productive and competitive.
Its still your choice to sit at home or go to work, but i dont feel i should pay taxes to support those who cannot be bothered.
In order to consume, you must produce.
digitised 4 years ago
If you think all candidates except Paul is Socialist, then I rest my case; His slogan is "elect me, so I can sit there and do nothing." your definition of socialism is more loose than anything I have heard. Adam Smith's free market system is about paying individuals based on the level of their productivity.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
But based on no economic standard is Warren Buffet - who made 46 million dollars last year - has contributed 100 times more to the economy than I have working in a key policy position in a think-tank in Washington DC 60 hours a week making about 45k.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
Yeah, and ironically he thinks he doesn't pay enough taxes! He thinks the tax structures favors the wealthy! Go figure! That should be a big wake up call to "markets decide all" people that the wealthy owe the most to society because they benefit the most!
saully1966 4 years ago
Government intervention is necessary, because the realities of our society and lack of perfect knowledge is resulting in certain segments of society not to get compensated based on their contribution, but also based on their color, social status, family name and wealth they are born into.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
"Its still your choice to sit at home or go to work, but i dont feel i should pay taxes to support those who cannot be bothered."
Seriously? are you joking or do you actually believe the people who rely on social security are lazy? how about the 33% of the people in the country who lost their jobs after the Great Depression? Were they lazy too? Were you joking when you said you were studying economics? Have you read about Keynes yet?
samspacewiz 4 years ago
ill Pm you a longer asnwer for the above.
Yes if you subsidise the poor you get more people quitting work, i live in the UK where we have huge social programs including free healthcare.
We have scandalous numbers of lazy claimants for all types of workshyness.
The great depression was govt and fed intervention with the markets. Free economies cannot collapse.
digitised 4 years ago
You call it "subsidise the poor," I call it giving the working under-compensated members of our society a hand up to make it. And the great depression was a perfect example of how economy can fail working people.
I pmed you right back, my friend.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
Well i would give them a hand up by abolishing the income tax and wage legislation so that firms can keep jobs on US soil and employ more workers.
You just cant give people a hand up, its rhetoric, if you steal from the rich, you leave them less money to invest so less jobs are created.
digitised 4 years ago
you call taxes "steal"ing from the rich when they themselves agree to be a part of the human-made economic structure? If you are playing a game of monopoly or poker and end up having to give some money to another player based on the rules of the game, you call that stealing too? And when you abolish income taxes, it is the rich who are benefiting most from it because they are the ones whose incomes are sometimes already over a thousand times what the average hard-working worder pays.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
life isnt a game like poker or monopoly now is it? and most people born in america never got a choice to decide if they wanted to play or not. your taxes go to fund wars and weapons that never see the light of day. billions are spent annually to make new weapons that never happen and it has been this way since WW2. taxes hasnt solved anything it has only open politics to crooks and thieves or have you forgot who richard nixon was? stop letting them think for you and think for yourself for once.
spacecab1 4 years ago
spacecab1 you think too much. You have to pay taxes and you have to die for your country, if your political leaders, you elected, want it. You should keep your government in high
esteem. They spend billions of dollars to protect you from every physical and mental threat, that might you prevent from paying taxes. ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
i don't need a pimp with a gun watching my back when i am doing fine without him.
spacecab1 3 years ago
spacecab1, if you are not happy with your government, you can either elect presidents
that pursue your opinion, or, you have to change country and aquire a new cititzenship.
I regularly become unrelaxed, whenever I read
complaints from people in democratic countries about their governments. ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
not really see what most people forget is the fact americans can revolt and the government cant really stop it since the constitution was designed so if politicians were corrupt and not listening to the citizens we could take back control. and who is gonna stop the citizens from revolting all the armed forces are busy at the moment in iraq
spacecab1 3 years ago
spacecab1, of course, every govt WILL stop a rebellion - even with deadly force. They have
the legal rights for. The thing is called sth. like 'inner national security act'.
However, a rebellion is the ultima ratio in totalitary regimes - but not in a democracy.
If you think, you have corrupt politicians,
elect a president who remove them from their
positions and establishes a transparent governemnt.
sacha4you 3 years ago
The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting. - Charles Bukowski
spacecab1 3 years ago
I agree completly. I clicked your profile and
saw, that you not only live in a country for that the first definition is applicable, but
you must be familiar too with gentlemen like
Laplace, Maxwell, Nyquist, Riccati, et. al.
;-))
PS: Don't panic. I won't discuss about LTI systems, Butterworth filters and such things.
sacha4you 3 years ago
The rich often gets overcompensated because contrary to Adam Smith's perfect world, markets are irrational; they don't just reward productivity and efficiency, but also race, gender, family name and a whole lot of other factors that have no impact on improving the lives of anyone in the economy.
samspacewiz 4 years ago
"Free economies cannot collapse"
The truth is that the traditional macroeconomic model of free economies does not allow it to collapse. In reality, however, free economies can and do experience market failure, and, even more often, individuals are failed by the market. Economists do a much worse job of modeling reality than many think. The set of foundational assumptions for economics doesn't allow it to represent the true situation.
ForceFeedNews 4 years ago
what a guy
kibromsolomon 4 years ago
Good answer. OBama & Ron Paul together to president.
Friss99 4 years ago
LOL!
researchin 4 years ago
Home Run.
nfoster6080 4 years ago