My I just say that u are using and AMD CPU for video rendering.. Which is a big mistake cos they aren't designed to run it aswell as an intel, but u only have a quad core AMD so that nvidea card was always going to be faster considering how amazing those cards are lol
Converting with GPU will lag PC down as much as converting with CPU. GPU is just much more powerful and it's harder to overload it, but weaker GPUs (for example mine 8800 GTS) gets overloaded even in simple CUDA applications, causing even god damn mouse pointer to lag.
Why didn’t you just set the CUDA renderer to CBR but VBR with average and minimum bit rate to 14 Mb/s ? Setting the CUDA to VBR doesn’t make sense to me in terms of comparison.
Thanks for the video, enjoyed it. But can i ask, when it is using cuda, can you still game as normal? would it affect anything? Does the cuda work with the cpu? Thanks
@TheJaycee88 CUDA uses the GPU and the CPU. It's GPU assisted, meaning it uses both to get the job done fasters, so you really won't want to be doing any gaming on it while it's rendering as it'll be using all the threads it can get to for the encoding process. You can carry on with other stuff though, just not things that will give the system a real work out otherwise it just reduces the stability and increased the chances of it failing the render, or crashing.
Hello, how you made this r123ender, I downloaded the most V-Ray RT did not work, I have a NVIDIA 9600 GT and ATI Radeon 5770, I need something like a tutorial, hug, grateful now ten
Oh man wtf how did I get here. First a video about some dude saying he has doom3 running with raytracing now another trying to compare a cpu and gpu using two different software packages. I aint saying the CPU would be faster just saying the test in this case is stupid.
And how the fuck this even ended in my recommended videos? How can even bing recommend something like this. How is it fucking possible that i have been awake for 36 hours?
How fucking boring and useless, can 10min video be? This is like the most retarted anal fuck i have ever seen. This is made for americans or something right?
You can't compare in two different NLE softwares. You need to do in either PR or Vegas. And Vegas doesn't support GPU render. Not a good comparison imo
'Rendering' is not the right word, 'encoding' is more appropriate because that's what you do when you convert videos from one format to another mpeg4/.mp4 in this case.
Actaully it will, the only reason why a gpu is so fast is because it is verry specialised (and thus limited) at certain things. A cpu can do anything you want.
@xZaaap a good editor program will not be cheap.. the programs used by major game makers are around $500 for the program and another few hundred depending on what the program comes with maybe a video and motion capturing AND audio will all be expensive
@killamilla45 Actually theres Pro grade free software out there..for example the last few Martin Scorsese films have been edited with Lightworks wich is free.
Even the 3D cgi space has excellent free software, such as Blender.
@postrock Calling Lightworks free is a bit of a stretch actually. They're actually just using the old bate and switch strategy. Yeah the program is free to download, but the moment you want to use many of the standard formats you have to pay, like Apple ProRes or the Red format etc. Meaning if you want to edit and render in anything other then than mpeg4 then you have to pay.
@faizanzd This guy is yet ANNOTHER ASSHOLE partner that can upload custom thumbnails and make their videos super misleading, custom thumbnails are the most retarded feature on youtube
You should see the difference in CPU and GPU rendering in 3ds max =) doing it right now. 150 frames on CPU took me 2 hours 2 minutes 59 seconds, 150 frames on GPU took me 1 minute 19 seconds.
wow. you should have fractions of video time when rendering with gpu. use badaboom if you have nvidia gpu, 2:30 video should take 20 seconds to render.
Note that it's better buying a GTX 560+ if you are running an older CPU. IF you're using an in i7 with hyperthreading, then there is no need for GPU rendering as it would take longer
@chuninuzomaki Actually I have a 2600k and when i render with my gpu (cuda) it goes about 1 minute faster. Also if you have a older cpu, the gtx560ti will be bottlenecked. In more recent versions of sony vegas you can render with the gpu.
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o Yeah, I know this Jackson. ATI did have something ATI STREAM or some such, it seems to still be on the ground. & only works with a few formats.
@TheSupersurgical Yes i searched the whole night about this ^^ i tried to find a video-rendering-programm that uses the graphics-card to render but this technology seems to bee down no plugin works :( the only thing i found is the amd-video converter for the catalyst that uses the GPU to comprimize the video files. works great =)
@TheSupersurgical in my opinion they should forgett the classic CPU´s ans use graphics für everything ;) dual GPU´s like the low-end card 3870x2 could do the same as a bulldozer with an singel 3870. one GPU for HD-video and gaming, the 2nd for the other stuff. i hope there will be a os that uses the gpu to 99% or sth. like this so that you need your CPU only for booting up that qould be nice =)
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o 45.F would be nicer :) So I killed my ancient 2004ish AMD single core machine rendering HD video for like 20hrs non-stop. Going to go with a AMD Phenom II X4 970 & try to find a mobo that will work with the "PNY VCQ600-PB Quadro 600" Simply because it has CUDA & is only $170.00 Can you recommend any ATI card that will speed up my render times faster then this CUDA card & near the price? I use Sony Vegas Pro, Ulead, Cinelerra-CV.
So why didn't you use the same program to render the same file at the same settings... and then just go into settings and for each test turn on and off GPU rendering. Also, you need to do same test on Core2Duo, and on i7, not just Phenom
I have Phenom IIx4 975 with Radeon HD 6750.. how about this ...? IS it better ? with 4 GB ram
aftabo3 3 days ago
dayum ur computer is fast
TheSavageFX 3 days ago
You talk FAR FAR too much.
aussienerds 1 week ago
the thumbnail is missleading
speedy123321 1 week ago
My I just say that u are using and AMD CPU for video rendering.. Which is a big mistake cos they aren't designed to run it aswell as an intel, but u only have a quad core AMD so that nvidea card was always going to be faster considering how amazing those cards are lol
Goldcrest7 1 week ago
Converting with GPU will lag PC down as much as converting with CPU. GPU is just much more powerful and it's harder to overload it, but weaker GPUs (for example mine 8800 GTS) gets overloaded even in simple CUDA applications, causing even god damn mouse pointer to lag.
Ripiz 2 weeks ago
Why didn’t you just set the CUDA renderer to CBR but VBR with average and minimum bit rate to 14 Mb/s ? Setting the CUDA to VBR doesn’t make sense to me in terms of comparison.
albedoshader 2 weeks ago
CUDA rulezzzz ;)
hromi 3 weeks ago
Just asking how a Intel Core i7 3960x would render it...
Germanyisthebest1 3 weeks ago
@Germanyisthebest1 3960x Has 6 Cores, GTX 560 Has 336 Cores...
evillllll1 2 days ago
@evillllll1 No,there you understand something wrong...
Germanyisthebest1 2 days ago
Isn't 840 not a true Phenom II or can you unlock the cache it lacks?
Tobiash87 3 weeks ago
2:52, ANNOYING, must be an idiot, or little kid in the room.
SrtRacerBoy 4 weeks ago 2
worlds most annoying mouse click
SrtRacerBoy 4 weeks ago
Where in the world was this video made?
vapourmile 1 month ago
Thanks for the video, enjoyed it. But can i ask, when it is using cuda, can you still game as normal? would it affect anything? Does the cuda work with the cpu? Thanks
TheJaycee88 1 month ago
@TheJaycee88 CUDA uses the GPU and the CPU. It's GPU assisted, meaning it uses both to get the job done fasters, so you really won't want to be doing any gaming on it while it's rendering as it'll be using all the threads it can get to for the encoding process. You can carry on with other stuff though, just not things that will give the system a real work out otherwise it just reduces the stability and increased the chances of it failing the render, or crashing.
TalesOfWar 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello, how you made this r123ender, I downloaded the most V-Ray RT did not work, I have a NVIDIA 9600 GT and ATI Radeon 5770, I need something like a tutorial, hug, grateful now ten
vccvicyou 1 month ago
gpu encoding lacks of quality and detail nothing beats handbreak!!!!!!!!!!
JakeVermont19 1 month ago
@JakeVermont19 the best one, and its free!!
SiniestroNetworks 1 month ago
Me torrent? No! uTorrent!
ItsTiedToAStick 1 month ago
did anyone else notice a onlive logo
mylaptopdiednooo 1 month ago
Oh man wtf how did I get here. First a video about some dude saying he has doom3 running with raytracing now another trying to compare a cpu and gpu using two different software packages. I aint saying the CPU would be faster just saying the test in this case is stupid.
OniMirage 1 month ago
What camera do you use to record with?
TheReviewGuys21 1 month ago
thumbs up if you were searching through the video the thumbnail...
belfa96 1 month ago
The guy who made this video is an idiot who has no clue on CPU vs GPU, please go back to flipping burgers, son.
Blitfast 2 months ago
How can i be so bored that i watched this till end?
FoleyQ 2 months ago
And how the fuck this even ended in my recommended videos? How can even bing recommend something like this. How is it fucking possible that i have been awake for 36 hours?
FoleyQ 2 months ago
How fucking boring and useless, can 10min video be? This is like the most retarted anal fuck i have ever seen. This is made for americans or something right?
FoleyQ 2 months ago
RENDER UR BRAIN
zubairgu 2 months ago
You can't compare in two different NLE softwares. You need to do in either PR or Vegas. And Vegas doesn't support GPU render. Not a good comparison imo
syndendesign 2 months ago
too many words...
abyssmd 2 months ago
Why so many dislikes? He's sharing some of his knowledge on how shit works when rendering videos.
vDEATHxSTROKEv 2 months ago
It does it because the chip GPU has ability to handle small tasks than a CPU could .
almouloudi 2 months ago
You sound like coldicepro...
ZoneClanHD 2 months ago
@ZoneClanHD wow i was thinking that !! haha
thetomgaming 2 months ago
@ZoneClanHD OOO it is him haha go on the battlefield 3 gameplay on the videos on the right it has his intro onit
thetomgaming 2 months ago
'Rendering' is not the right word, 'encoding' is more appropriate because that's what you do when you convert videos from one format to another mpeg4/.mp4 in this case.
veselin4 2 months ago
Was that an algebra textbook by the laptop?
CrispyBacon12 2 months ago
check my video comparison cpu vs cuda in my channel :)
ZenithZephyroth 2 months ago
this video waste your life ! skip to 9:20
wicker558 2 months ago
5 and a half minutes of the guy fiddling around in his file folders? No thanks.
otonanoC 2 months ago 2
CPU renderer can still allot more stuff than GPU renderers. GPU renderers are allot more limited in terms of shader effects etc...
Capeau 2 months ago
@Capeau They won't be for long.
muffins4tots 2 months ago
@muffins4tots
Actaully it will, the only reason why a gpu is so fast is because it is verry specialised (and thus limited) at certain things. A cpu can do anything you want.
Capeau 2 months ago
@Capeau I don't know too much about the actual processors in GPU as compared to CPU's so i don't know for sure.
muffins4tots 2 months ago
Gpu win for games and rendering.
gospeda 3 months ago
i can't use GPU i Sony Vegas Pro 11
TheGaming1000 3 months ago
@TheGaming1000 CyberLink PowerDirector use the gpu for rendering and it is better and simpler than sony vegas pro.
midcoregamer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shut the fuck up. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
DavidXG360 3 months ago
i know a nrenderer that uses gpu and cpu at the same time
badwolfshamma 3 months ago
@badwolfshamma wat is it Plz Tell !!
RazerrFTW 3 months ago
@RazerrFTW indigo renderer for mac and pc free 30 day trail version and you can edit the textures realtime whilst rendering,
badwolfshamma 3 months ago
i was completely hooked. then when he said $80 i shut off the video.
xZaaap 3 months ago 4
@xZaaap a good editor program will not be cheap.. the programs used by major game makers are around $500 for the program and another few hundred depending on what the program comes with maybe a video and motion capturing AND audio will all be expensive
killamilla45 3 months ago
@killamilla45 Actually theres Pro grade free software out there..for example the last few Martin Scorsese films have been edited with Lightworks wich is free.
Even the 3D cgi space has excellent free software, such as Blender.
postrock 3 months ago
@postrock Calling Lightworks free is a bit of a stretch actually. They're actually just using the old bate and switch strategy. Yeah the program is free to download, but the moment you want to use many of the standard formats you have to pay, like Apple ProRes or the Red format etc. Meaning if you want to edit and render in anything other then than mpeg4 then you have to pay.
SquirrelFromGradLife 3 months ago
@xZaaap Are you insane? That is cheap for a video editing software!
GustavNils 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You talk too much.
elevul 3 months ago
i can't see the thumbnail portion anywhere in the video...in which two images r side by side
faizanzd 3 months ago 76
@faizanzd This guy is yet ANNOTHER ASSHOLE partner that can upload custom thumbnails and make their videos super misleading, custom thumbnails are the most retarded feature on youtube
mclmatty 1 month ago
@mclmatty
AND he's just building e-peen about his crappy GTX560.
nullins 1 month ago
jay! i got 2 i7's 4 core in parallel connection!
goeiecool9999 4 months ago
@goeiecool9999 and 2.8 GHz
goeiecool9999 4 months ago
uTorrent... nice!
Kenjuudo 4 months ago
You should see the difference in CPU and GPU rendering in 3ds max =) doing it right now. 150 frames on CPU took me 2 hours 2 minutes 59 seconds, 150 frames on GPU took me 1 minute 19 seconds.
stoneyharrieXeve 4 months ago
@stoneyharrieXeve which renderer do you use to render scenes on the GPU with 3dsmax ??
blackrack2008 4 months ago
an AMD chip is in no way = to any Nvidea card so to me this test is invalid
DEKARONGAMER97 4 months ago
I don't like videos that start with a blank desktop and the uploader talks for moments before actual thing begins.
TheodenN 5 months ago 191
@TheodenN Then don't watch. It's as simple as that.
d3tach3d 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@d3tach3d
I didn't watched it.
TheodenN 4 months ago
@TheodenN *watch
TheodenN 4 months ago
@TheodenN lol
sikeyimboyleisi 4 months ago
@TheodenN then dont watch it
GamersCanGame 3 months ago
@TheodenN Who gives a shit? I don't....
accramafia 3 months ago
@TheodenN youtube is full of those
pghg022 3 months ago
wow. you should have fractions of video time when rendering with gpu. use badaboom if you have nvidia gpu, 2:30 video should take 20 seconds to render.
sharpehenry 5 months ago
How do you drag your windows 7 desktop like that
Dr3aDnAuGhTz 5 months ago
did you know some program use cuda, and also the cpu, so if you have good graphics card and quadcore you can render very fast.
007Neutrin0 5 months ago
Go blow your nose allready ?
effestars 5 months ago
omg finally someone with my laptop!
FlawlessWalkthroughs 6 months ago
Note that it's better buying a GTX 560+ if you are running an older CPU. IF you're using an in i7 with hyperthreading, then there is no need for GPU rendering as it would take longer
chuninuzomaki 6 months ago
@chuninuzomaki Actually I have a 2600k and when i render with my gpu (cuda) it goes about 1 minute faster. Also if you have a older cpu, the gtx560ti will be bottlenecked. In more recent versions of sony vegas you can render with the gpu.
Amuffin456 6 months ago
Very helpful. Thx
bobbyd79903 6 months ago
A good Xeon server processor runs faster than a 580GTX...
HenryTomasino1 6 months ago
@HenryTomasino1 Dude that means you have never tried gpu rendering.
AramAzhari 6 months ago
@AramAzhari Dude that means I have experience... Like my 470 can render faster than a good xeon >.>
HenryTomasino1 6 months ago
@HenryTomasino1 oh ok then. I have a gtx285 and a gtx570 and I have an HP Xeon.
I use fryrender and my 570 is way faster than my cpu. and 580 is better than 570.
AramAzhari 6 months ago
Sony Vegas 10.0e Supports GPU render in AVC format only for now
FaTaL1h 7 months ago
Your video is one of the best out there that demonstrate GPU rendering for ATI :)
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
Anyone know if ATI Stream is on par with CUDA?
.
.
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
@TheSupersurgical cuda is an NVidia technology and not available for ati or AMD-cards
o0oHeavyAVFo0o 8 months ago
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o Yeah, I know this Jackson. ATI did have something ATI STREAM or some such, it seems to still be on the ground. & only works with a few formats.
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
@TheSupersurgical Yes i searched the whole night about this ^^ i tried to find a video-rendering-programm that uses the graphics-card to render but this technology seems to bee down no plugin works :( the only thing i found is the amd-video converter for the catalyst that uses the GPU to comprimize the video files. works great =)
o0oHeavyAVFo0o 8 months ago
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o Programs do support ATI video card support, its usually "OpenGL" & still works better then cpu as far as video nle editing/rendering.
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o . ..how do you think the FX chips will be at this?
.
.
I think what video cards got going for them is the ultra fast DDR5 ram
more then anything.
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
@TheSupersurgical in my opinion they should forgett the classic CPU´s ans use graphics für everything ;) dual GPU´s like the low-end card 3870x2 could do the same as a bulldozer with an singel 3870. one GPU for HD-video and gaming, the 2nd for the other stuff. i hope there will be a os that uses the gpu to 99% or sth. like this so that you need your CPU only for booting up that qould be nice =)
o0oHeavyAVFo0o 8 months ago
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o . ...they get so damn hot & have shorter life-spans then cpu's & costly!!!
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
@TheSupersurgical
1. buy a good cooler ;) i got an accelero s1 on my 3870 and she never gets over 45°
2. Than they must build "harder" and "heavier" cards ;)
3. my 3870 costed 25€ (28$) and i can play crysis @ high ;)
ps: OC FTW^^
o0oHeavyAVFo0o 8 months ago
@o0oHeavyAVFo0o 45.F would be nicer :) So I killed my ancient 2004ish AMD single core machine rendering HD video for like 20hrs non-stop. Going to go with a AMD Phenom II X4 970 & try to find a mobo that will work with the "PNY VCQ600-PB Quadro 600" Simply because it has CUDA & is only $170.00 Can you recommend any ATI card that will speed up my render times faster then this CUDA card & near the price? I use Sony Vegas Pro, Ulead, Cinelerra-CV.
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago
So why didn't you use the same program to render the same file at the same settings... and then just go into settings and for each test turn on and off GPU rendering. Also, you need to do same test on Core2Duo, and on i7, not just Phenom
cobrachoppergirl 9 months ago
will it rendering in ATI
navarretejason1986 10 months ago
@navarretejason1986 no
yameconoces 9 months ago
@navarretejason1986 now it will.
terorvlad 4 months ago
i hope the next vegas is going to be more gpu demanding
xb4b1x 10 months ago
@xb4b1x as far as I know, premiere pro cs5 & vegas pro 10 supports CUDA
TheSupersurgical 8 months ago