Can someone help me here? In axiel22's comment he mentioned that ih(1/f(t))df(t)/dt = E, when solved, goes to f(t)= e^(-iEt/h). But shouldn't there be a constant C in there as well? Or am I just missing something?
THANKS FOR THIS :D big thanks from me, really really helped me alot. As others said, really like your tempo, and the no bullshit, just straight to the board and do handle the equation.
Good video, easy to understand... Did you show how to solve for the Time evolution operator in another video? solving the LHS when equated to E... (integrate both sides.. blah blah blah)
as far as i know, the laplacian is an operator, so what you say about it is fine. but i think you should not call V an operator. it is a function of x (in the time-independent case), so you can simply allow the f(t) division.
Regarding that x is also an operator in quantum mechanics, V(x) can be an operator if x is regarded as such because it then would be an operator-function, which is an operator. Wave functions are always vectors in a given hilbert-base (in this case the x-operator-base)
Oh dear me how... your are talking so fast, that makes me crazy... good, that I've already passed QM I and QM II - slow down :D if you talk slowlier, people can follow you better
Is this the way donny lee teach students? sorry i would not have been able to cambridge maths tripos papers from GH Hardy and university first year maths problems when i was 16 being a top student in my time.
Hi Donny, very wonderful. I am wondering if you are genius. You are so young but all recondite quantum and mathemetics come naturally to you! You have farly outnumbered the guaduate level. Are you study now? Hope you are a rising star of science.
Great video. I understand all of the mathematics, but I don't see the derivation of the Time-dependent equation. Why is the equation what it is and where does it come from? I always like to know the roots.
Okay, nevermind. I found the derivation on wikipedia (my university!) It was very interesting and surprisingly simple! The simplicity of this video is very encouraging.
I just want to clarify out something that confused me at first. So we split up psi(x,t)= psi(x)f(t). Then By doing some arrangements, we get two equations:
1. (-h^2/2m)delpsi(x)+V(x)psi(x) = Epsi(x)
and
2. ih(1/f(t))df(t)/dt = E
we solve the second one to get
f(t)= e^(-iEt/h)
Then we have psi(x,t)=psi(x)e^(-iEt/h)
and all we need to do now is solve the time independent schrodigner equation to get psi(x). I hope I understood this correctly. (also h = h bar in the above eqs)
Yes, you are spot on! Good thing you caught this early.
This simply means that for time-independent potentials, we only need to solve the time-independent Schrodinger Equation, get the wave functions psi and energy values E, and in doing so, we have found all the states by multiplying by f(t).
Remember, time-independent potentials / Hamiltonians only! For time-dependent potentials, another story altogether.
Can someone help me here? In axiel22's comment he mentioned that ih(1/f(t))df(t)/dt = E, when solved, goes to f(t)= e^(-iEt/h). But shouldn't there be a constant C in there as well? Or am I just missing something?
risiblewilbury 2 weeks ago
THANKS FOR THIS :D big thanks from me, really really helped me alot. As others said, really like your tempo, and the no bullshit, just straight to the board and do handle the equation.
arib93 1 month ago
haha i like your enthusiasm, makes me want to study! fast facts and no BS like in other videos
800alias 3 months ago
He sounds like christopher walkens haha, but good video
playbaseball2 4 months ago
Thanks for making revision AWESOME!
Chrisboff 8 months ago
Thanks for making revision AWESOME!
Chrisboff 8 months ago
ur sweet dancing style is a great time pass for the small kids...
well u r a nice teacher too...
others are like boring and teach boring too...
But u r the one, who makes boring things seem interesting...
Ur nature is so kind...
U r an ideal teacher...
U r the best...
vivekkumardaga 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amazing ... amazing.. you are amazing :) Keep uploading more videos please :)
blommasidan 1 year ago
4:49pm Saturday (CDT) - Time in Houston, Texas
DDIRibsNtimeay
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
3:26pmThursdayCDTTimenMOGULMONOLITH
6:36
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
7:33pm Wednesday (EDT) - Time in New York, United States of America
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
Good video, easy to understand... Did you show how to solve for the Time evolution operator in another video? solving the LHS when equated to E... (integrate both sides.. blah blah blah)
jappadadappa 1 year ago
wow i love this
other online professors are like 170 yrs old
and they talk like 3 words an hour
this guy just charges through everything in like 10 minute vids
and i swear he's getting more energetic as the vid goes on
szhan1022 1 year ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
This teacher is identical to my teacher Shi-Hai Dong of quantum mechanics
Professor. Department of Physics. Superior School of Physics and Mathematics. National Polytechnic Institut
rafael47601 1 year ago
Comment removed
rafael47601 1 year ago
Comment removed
rafael47601 1 year ago
Nice video ....The time dependent is not given enough respect.
gregthesenior12 1 year ago
wow! i learned Quantum mechanics from bruce Lee
chathujg 1 year ago
very helpfull! thx
123Kaduk 1 year ago
1:11
basically
DoubleDutchBust 1 year ago
5:57am Saturday (CDTTime in Mississippi, United States
7:55
1312G 0 1:12
DoubleDutchBust 1 year ago
2:52pm Saturday (MSD) - Time in Moscow, Russia
DoubleDutchBust 1 year ago
2:22
back 2
DoubleDutchBust 1 year ago
I don't care about equations but you are SO cute!
jazzprincess 1 year ago
why chinese are far more smarter than muslims?i really admire chinese religion!
samgee2007 1 year ago
@samgee2007 Chinese religion? Lol.
philno88 1 year ago
Wow If I had an instructor like this, I would not be able to understand no offence.
NavB00 2 years ago
2:45pm Tuesday (CST) - Time in Mississippi, United States of America
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
time in LA 9:42 AM
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
10:08am Monday (CST) - Time in
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
as far as i know, the laplacian is an operator, so what you say about it is fine. but i think you should not call V an operator. it is a function of x (in the time-independent case), so you can simply allow the f(t) division.
gjs2512 2 years ago
Regarding that x is also an operator in quantum mechanics, V(x) can be an operator if x is regarded as such because it then would be an operator-function, which is an operator. Wave functions are always vectors in a given hilbert-base (in this case the x-operator-base)
shinzon0 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
very good for ten minutes.
ygustavo 2 years ago
Oh dear me how... your are talking so fast, that makes me crazy... good, that I've already passed QM I and QM II - slow down :D if you talk slowlier, people can follow you better
shinzon0 2 years ago
keep in mind that he has 10 minutes to talk about quantum mechanics...
cwxzeng 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Comment removed
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Mathematicians often write nabla upside-down, instead of squaring it, to refer to the Laplacian.
bluesrunthegame 2 years ago
Dude you're amazing!
zxeritross 2 years ago
Thanks for all these vids, my textbooks are hopelessly written, its people like you that save the day for people like me. :p
GaryKoji 2 years ago 2
I simply cannot see how Schrödinger is considered a quantum physics i always see it more as calculation of probability
whydid666 2 years ago
It describes probabilities in quantum physics
tifius 2 years ago
pawtical?
tavo5150 2 years ago
could u upload this video again? it doesn't work. and thanks for all these videos
bluedeath116 3 years ago
Is this the way donny lee teach students? sorry i would not have been able to cambridge maths tripos papers from GH Hardy and university first year maths problems when i was 16 being a top student in my time.
vjpillay 3 years ago
HE HAS 10 MINUTES ... time dependent
4HOMELESStheCHANNEL 2 years ago 3
second order partial derivative written as inverted delta ,inverted triange
vjpillay 3 years ago
Hi Donny, very wonderful. I am wondering if you are genius. You are so young but all recondite quantum and mathemetics come naturally to you! You have farly outnumbered the guaduate level. Are you study now? Hope you are a rising star of science.
zuojianqiu 3 years ago 2
Donny your vids are amazing! I only hope I can approach your level of mathematical ability.
CNaq1 3 years ago
Great video. I understand all of the mathematics, but I don't see the derivation of the Time-dependent equation. Why is the equation what it is and where does it come from? I always like to know the roots.
simplystimpy 3 years ago
Okay, nevermind. I found the derivation on wikipedia (my university!) It was very interesting and surprisingly simple! The simplicity of this video is very encouraging.
simplystimpy 3 years ago
it's a bit like Newtons second law. It cannot be proved or derived it is just an equation which fits the observation.
zzzzzzd 2 years ago
I just want to clarify out something that confused me at first. So we split up psi(x,t)= psi(x)f(t). Then By doing some arrangements, we get two equations:
1. (-h^2/2m)delpsi(x)+V(x)psi(x) = Epsi(x)
and
2. ih(1/f(t))df(t)/dt = E
we solve the second one to get
f(t)= e^(-iEt/h)
Then we have psi(x,t)=psi(x)e^(-iEt/h)
and all we need to do now is solve the time independent schrodigner equation to get psi(x). I hope I understood this correctly. (also h = h bar in the above eqs)
axiel22 3 years ago
Yes, you are spot on! Good thing you caught this early.
This simply means that for time-independent potentials, we only need to solve the time-independent Schrodinger Equation, get the wave functions psi and energy values E, and in doing so, we have found all the states by multiplying by f(t).
Remember, time-independent potentials / Hamiltonians only! For time-dependent potentials, another story altogether.
donylee 3 years ago
i followed this video fine, but how do we solve the time-independent schrodinger equation to get psi(x)? is there a video for that?
jimmyshitbags 3 years ago