I am a compositor, meaning I apply special effects and alter video for clients for one of the largest studios in the U.S. Specifically I work in Motion Graphics, and have for a long time, my eye is trained to see any discrepancies in film. Myself and my co-workers looked at the film after I brought this up and find the video to be legit. software and film alternation that would have been effected were absolutely not available at the time of the movies release.
The question was posed below, "How does what he said prove that the shots come from multiple places?". Granted, technically speaking, it is a theory HOWEVER, what did the WC "prove" about where the shots came from? Their theory on what the film shows is just that as well, a theory. Just because the WC was first to analyze it, doesn't mean it (they) were correct. So it was an agency assembled by our govt? Does that mean their conclusions cannot be questioned?
look at frames 379-381...look closely...did you catch it? thats f*cking impossible! the man goes from feet together to feet apart in about 1/18 of a second this is undeniable proof that something was done to this film...
@IwshIcldstrtover Ok... We understand your point. Anyone, and everyone who does any research or offers any testimony that contradicts the official single shooter story is a 'NUTCASE'. Just run along, you phony. END OF STORY.
@Gunnarsguns Go tell this to the people who were there and can identify themselves in the film, then. That you can even believe such a thing is par for the course.
Gary Mack is a fraud and charlatan of the highest order. Whichever way the dollar blows is the direction he will follow, whether that leads to a conspiracy or not. Pay this man enough money, and he'll tell you that Jackie Kennedy pulled the trigger on her husband. The doctors at Parkland clearly saw the entrance wound on the right temporal area of JFK's head and relayed that information to Kilduff.
i heard gary mack say in a interview about the sound of the shots and that some people heard them come from the grassy knoll. he said that sounds in ealey plaza bounce of buildings etc so its hard to determine where they come from ... doesnt what he said prove that the shots come from multiple places .i bet not even one shot was fired from the texas school book depository it was a distraction from the real gunmen ......gary mack sold out to the mighty dollar ....
The Kilduff evidence is not the strongest in isolation. It is entirely possible he meant right through the head, and possible it meant literally what he demonstrated. The power of the comment, whatever its original meaning, was edited out of the TV representation of his speech, however; the Bethesda doctors' corroborating evidence years later is reasonable as conclusive, along with Mantik's absolute proof of fakery of the X-rays, proven with optical densitometry tests of the X-rays.
I am a compositor, meaning I apply special effects and alter video for clients for one of the largest studios in the U.S. Specifically I work in Motion Graphics, and have for a long time, my eye is trained to see any discrepancies in film. Myself and my co-workers looked at the film after I brought this up and find the video to be legit. software and film alternation that would have been effected were absolutely not available at the time of the movies release.
MOXWELLDIAMOND 9 months ago
@MOXWELLDIAMOND Dont trust this guy. trust your own judgment, he might just be working for the president.
regularbonj 7 months ago
The question was posed below, "How does what he said prove that the shots come from multiple places?". Granted, technically speaking, it is a theory HOWEVER, what did the WC "prove" about where the shots came from? Their theory on what the film shows is just that as well, a theory. Just because the WC was first to analyze it, doesn't mean it (they) were correct. So it was an agency assembled by our govt? Does that mean their conclusions cannot be questioned?
Autshot20 10 months ago
look at frames 379-381...look closely...did you catch it? thats f*cking impossible! the man goes from feet together to feet apart in about 1/18 of a second this is undeniable proof that something was done to this film...
kermit368 1 year ago
Comment removed
kermit368 1 year ago
Jim Fetzer is a nutcase. End of story.
IwshIcldstrtover 1 year ago
@IwshIcldstrtover Ok... We understand your point. Anyone, and everyone who does any research or offers any testimony that contradicts the official single shooter story is a 'NUTCASE'. Just run along, you phony. END OF STORY.
slotstikskimboards 1 year ago
@slotstikskimboards Good. Glad to see that you agree.
IwshIcldstrtover 1 year ago
The people on the lawn appear to large in relation to the people in the car. It is clearly altered in all versions
Gunnarsguns 1 year ago
@Gunnarsguns Go tell this to the people who were there and can identify themselves in the film, then. That you can even believe such a thing is par for the course.
IwshIcldstrtover 1 year ago
Gary Mack is a fraud and charlatan of the highest order. Whichever way the dollar blows is the direction he will follow, whether that leads to a conspiracy or not. Pay this man enough money, and he'll tell you that Jackie Kennedy pulled the trigger on her husband. The doctors at Parkland clearly saw the entrance wound on the right temporal area of JFK's head and relayed that information to Kilduff.
squirevet 2 years ago
i heard gary mack say in a interview about the sound of the shots and that some people heard them come from the grassy knoll. he said that sounds in ealey plaza bounce of buildings etc so its hard to determine where they come from ... doesnt what he said prove that the shots come from multiple places .i bet not even one shot was fired from the texas school book depository it was a distraction from the real gunmen ......gary mack sold out to the mighty dollar ....
jellyadult 2 years ago 2
@jellyadult How does what he said prove that the shots come from multiple places? I don't follow you.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
Oops. I meant this comment to reply to someone who commented on Part 3.
boobah1067 2 years ago
The Kilduff evidence is not the strongest in isolation. It is entirely possible he meant right through the head, and possible it meant literally what he demonstrated. The power of the comment, whatever its original meaning, was edited out of the TV representation of his speech, however; the Bethesda doctors' corroborating evidence years later is reasonable as conclusive, along with Mantik's absolute proof of fakery of the X-rays, proven with optical densitometry tests of the X-rays.
boobah1067 2 years ago