Added: 1 year ago
From: johann10000
Views: 157,384
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (140)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guys a dumb libril

  • @Davidrochat509 i'll take a "dumb libril" over a factual illiterate anyday.

  • Louis C.K. 2012

  • Actually do your homework, Marriage was there before religon, religon just took it on board and made it into its own, Gay people are not asking to get married in Churches they just want the right, and hell yes they should get this, the benefits of being married are immense, so why the hell not? Homophobic people and religous nuts are so fucking dumb.

  • marrige isnt a religious issue since elvis became a priest in vegas

  • im against gay marriage but louis ck makes a very valid point

  • I think it is rediculous for us as HUMANS to judge what we think others should like. Im a straight man, and have 4 very very close gay best friends. For ONE, they cant help what they like, thats just what they like and how they are wired. If u want to bring the christian card out, well, we as christians are supposed to practice acceptance and toleration. point blank. I LOVE my gay GUY friends. and IM STRAIGHT CHRISTIAN!!!!! hoo wuda thawt.

  • i knew it! the only problem heters have with gay marriage is they don't want to put out for a gift...that's just low...that makes them both bigots and cheap!!!

  • Fun fact: There are 2 verses in the bible that say homosexuality is an abomination but 3 verses that say eating shellfish is an abomination. Therefore, God hates lobsters 50% more than he hates fags.

  • I used to be against gay marriage until I realized being against gay marriage isn't going to get rid of gay people. You don't have to agree with gay marriage, but the fact is, people have a right to be gay in this country.

  • Who cares about the history. Marriage is a legal binding of two individuals. Since it is legal religion has no bearing on it. Our constitution barres descrimination due to race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. I really don't see why it's an issue.

  • ugly children. hahahahahah

  • Some men love women. Some men love men. Someone women love men. Some women love women.

    And it doesn't make one bit of difference to you, me, or the universe. So get over it. It's the twenty-first century, for fuck's sake.

  • @Szaam Really eh. You'd think that society-by now- would be worrying about bigger issues...global warming, genocide, conserving depleting natural resources etc. but still when a celebrity or something turns out to be gay everyone makes a big deal about it. like who the fuck cares of he/she is gay? Good for them. its 2012 now and some people still cant wrap their head around the fact that some people are gay.

  • frickin,, no one cares about the christian views on gay marrage here!! when ever a homophobic christian see's "gay" on the title, they juz let out 1/3 of the bible on us!!

  • Okay you want marriage to remain a religious thing? Fine than it should just be that, lets get rid of all your tax benefits and home owner benefits. As Louis said, Gay marriage has ZERO affect on anyone but the two people in the marriage.

  • im pretty sure if god was as lovely and amazing as you think he is, he wouldnt give a shit aboutyour sexuality and would love the idea of them getting married, he doesnt even exist anyway so shut the fuck up and stop bashing homosexuality.

  • So, seeing as church/temple/mosque marriages are religious by definition, does anybody reading this have a reasonable explanation to why those should be recognized by the state(invoking the seperation of church and state) while civil unions don't afford the same benefits? Cause I think that's slightly stupid.

  • i am shutting down comments for this video. i dont wanna give christian extremists a chance to dilute the message of the great louis ck by posting nonsensical and rationally offensive comments.

  • Do you know why people have a problem with gays getting married? Not because they hate gays, but because marriage is originally a religious sacrament. So people like me who disagree with gay marriage don't like the federal government given the choice to decide on a religious issue.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy Which is why the government should only be in involved in civil unions. If people want a religiously sanctioned union then that should be between them and their church.

  • @ediblevineyard which it will be for all eternity. if a church wants to bless a gay union, why would you wanna restrict that? what you want, sounds like fascism to me...

  • @johann10000 I don't want to restrict that. That's up to religious officials. I just think if legal unions were secularized, we could overcome the "sanctity of marriage" argument. The government just shouldn't be involved in religious institutions. not sure what's fascist about that.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy exactly. That is why marriage should not be recognized by the federal government, because it is a religious issue. If two guys or girls want to get married they should be able too. Not you or any one else should be able to tell me that I can not have a ceremony which represents life long monogamy which some one of the same sex. In fact this can happen, but the relationship wont be legally recognized.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy the word which in the second too last sentence should be with.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy don't like gay marriage? don't have one.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy but marriages are legal once both parties sign a marriage license, which are dealt with by state governments, not churches. i can go down to a courthouse and be married, without ever needing to step foot inside a church. the church's stance on marriage is almost irrelevant at this point.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy So America has to follow your religion?

  • @DatPicksburghGuy So what you are really saying is that somehow religion "invented" marriage and hence no one should change it? Well news flash for you, marriage and even homosexuality has been around way longer than religion. Does Sodoma mean something to you?

  • @jpcosta Hey, I found the fact about marriage being around longer than religion really interesting. Have any source for that info? Tried googleing it but can't seem to find any information on the subject? Thank you :)

  • @Dauglashalfve Wikipedia is a good place to start. The Marriage article the "History of marriage by culture" starts of with: "Although the institution of marriage pre-dates reliable recorded history, many cultures have legends concerning the origins of marriage."

  • @jpcosta Thank you! I really appreciate it :D

  • @DatPicksburghGuy So you think God doesn't like gay people because of what some guy wrote in a book almost 2000 years ago? God didn't write the Bible, people did. You shouldn't interpret everything so literally.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy Marriage existed long before any of the main modern religions. The reason people don't like gay marriage is because they have small minds and think that other, equally small-minded, people think better of them for it. I mean, heaven forbid that a Christian actually doesn't judge anyone. Funny how they follow some tenets of dogma to the letter but ignore the ones that don't suit them.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy Actually the history of marriage extends beyond recorded history so your assumption that it's rooted in religion is just that, an assumption. Chances are that marriage had more to do with safety, knowing whose kids were whose, and barter than anything to do with religion.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy If you look into the history of marriage you'll se that it wasn't a "religious sacrament". Just look into the greek mythology for example.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy Which is why they shouldn't get involved in NOT allowing gay marriages while STILL allowing heterosexual marriages. It may have started a religious sacrament, but society is naturally NOT religious in its existence, and the society you live in has a marriage vow that carries with it certain rights that should be available to all that deserve to be married. It's as simple as that.

  • @DatPicksburghGuy "marriage is originally a religious sacrament"

    Citation needed.

  • Comment removed

  • I live in the UK, and have never had a Cinnabun. Louis CK made me find a recipe, complete with jizzy hot syrup.

  • this guy is my new favorite comedian.

  • if you don't like gay marriage, don't get gay married.

  • @CanIhavesomemoreMuse but i want to :(

  • Louis CK for president of the fucking world.

  • 666 Likes? Im about to make this 667 so we have no religious issues..

  • Da Cock

  • Fred Phelps and his cult watched this 15 times.

  • "good, fuckin i hope he blows his dog!"

  • If this was shown at every Republican debate I feel like a lot of issues would be resolved.

  • people just need to mind their own business about other people. you know what'll happen if gay marriage is legal? gay people will get married. that's it.

  • @vjaurleila why should Christians change there beliefs because two people want a gay ass meaningless title for them too share?

  • @taylorjamesdylan *their, to. maybe you should worry less about gay marriage and more about schooling. also, why should gay people have to change their lives for a religion some don't even believe. it's hilarious how your religion says that brittney spears can get married for 55 days, but two men or women can't get married.

  • @taylorjamesdylan "Meaningless" is an opiniated term. WHO THE FUCK CARES WHAT YOU THINK? If you listen closely to CK's videos, you realize that he doesn't hate gays, but just their "odd" behavior. I got freaked out too, but that was only because I'm not comfortable with it, but can that be changed? No; I just walk away and live life. My history teachers talked about social pyramids; do you see homosexuals at the bottom? No. Do you see Atheists and Jews at the bottom? NO! Just fucking peasants!

  • @vjaurleila You forgot to add in the Apocalypse. You're welcome

  • @airemillion90 obviousl troll is obvious

  • Oh my god, that's too funny.

  • (cont...) to everyone else including gay people: be tolerant of any religion and its ways and rules. AND STFU EVERYBODY and go enjoy your life, frolic on strawberry fields, hug a cat, watch the sunset... Peace and love maaaan.

  • @ZiahtandEcyla Religion is bad.

    End of story.

  • @SandGoose0 It's not the religion... it's the religious folks x]

  • @ZiahtandEcyla I full hardheadedly dis agree with your statement. If that was true, then you find just as many non religoius people opposing gay marriage.

    The truth is, you'll be hard pressed to find someone who is an atheist / agnostic atheist who is strongly opposed to gays and / or homophobic.

    Religion IS the problem.

  • @SandGoose0 I beg to differ... There are religious people that follow a religion and do not oppose it. The reliious folks that oppose it are the problem. They take things way too far. The problem is not what the religion says, it is how the people that follow it take it. Besides, religion can be modeled to fit any society, its rules and customs are altered over time to fit the social changes(it just happens it's not like there's a council or anything don't twist my words to say something else).

  • @SandGoose0 (cont) The problem is really with the Religious Change-phobics that think the word of a 'God' from a millenium ago is absolute and that any change that deviates from 'His' righteous path is devil's work. PLUS the bible, the koran, the whateveritisthatreligionhas is ambiguous: You can make words mean whatever the fuck you want them to mean. It's the people that use those words to make the world the way hey want it that are fucked up.

  • @ZiahtandEcyla No, it's the religion. The religious texts make it clear that homosexuality is bad.

    The religious folks are a problem too; because they're religious.

  • @ninjajesus81 i honestly don't care anymore...

  • @ninjajesus81 It is true that homosexuality is bad according to text - we must have the freedom to choose. If you choose God regardless, then that is great. If you choose otherwise, you'll probably still live a good life but at what cause.

    Honestly tho, this is a bad place to try and talk for God.

  • @NicoDLdaLaguna We must have the freedom to choose to hate homosexuals? Sure, people should be able to hate or love whatever they want. People should be allowed to hate blacks too. It's their right. But do we have to respect them for it? No. And should they be able to make legislation based on their hates? No.

  • @ninjajesus81 Dumbass... I meant we have the freedom to do everything - both good and bad. Your choice, if you've got a problem with it - don't shoot the messenger. Once you choose however, you'll have to live with the consequences of that choice.

    I must admit, it's easy to shoot down this basic argument... take it however you want. Your choice.

  • @NicoDLdaLaguna You're absolutely right, this is not the place to talk about god, or your evil hate mongering text.

  • @NicoDLdaLaguna You're absolutely right, this is not the place to talk about god, or your evil hate mongering text.

  • @NicoDLdaLaguna You're absolutely right, this is not the place to talk about god, or your evil hate mongering text.

  • @NicoDLdaLaguna You call me a dumbass and then say don't shoot the messenger.

  • @ninjajesus81 Minor variable. Forgive my crassness.

  • @ninjajesus81 Actually no religious texts (or at least this is true about the bible) say anything about Homosexuality. It doesn't mention it not even in a good way it's just blended all in. People who say the bible says god hates homosexuality just pulled that out of their ass(pun intended)

  • @LevitasDCuban You're a liar. Homosexuality is talked about in the Bible several times. It even says to kill men who sleep with other men. That's what homosexuality is.

  • @ninjajesus81 what chapter/verse?

  • @gibbo1112 Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

  • @ninjajesus81 where

    

  • @LevitasDCuban I just posted it but here it is again Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

  • @ninjajesus81 This is true. However, if you follow every bit of blatant hypocrisy that is so rampant throughout the bible then you cannot possibly consider yourself a moral human being. For instance, the bible also tells you to kill women if they aren't virgins on their wedding night (See Deuteronomy 22), and it is written numerous times in Exodus that if you are found working on the Sabbath you should be put to death. So don't take anything written in the bible literally. God is Love, stupid.

  • @CowboyDan I don't take anything written in the Bible literally, including the existence of god.

    Why would you believe in a god talked about in a book that's full of bullshit? If the rest of it is bullshit, then why should I trust that the god part isn't bullshit too? The Bible has no credibility.

  • @ninjajesus81 I didn't say anything about my own personal spiritual beliefs, and to be honest, I somewhat mistook you for one of those crazy ignorant fundamentalists

  • The biggest reason why people are against gay marriage is because of religion. They don't get that marriage on the paper and marriage in a church/mosque/idkanythingabout­religion are two separate events. A gay couple marries on the paper, its a civil union. Now if a gay couple wants to marry on the church, and it is not accepted in the eyes of that religion then FUCK IT. You can't change a religion. So to religious freaks: be tolerant to gay people getting married. To everyone else(including gay

  • My only worry is this: Where do we draw the line? I mean, apparently beastiality* isn't so wrong anymore, everyone got a good laugh out of that. We all know those animals don't have a choice. What about pedophiles, then? People are "born this way", right? So hell, why can't a 40 year old man marry an 11 year old boy if they both consent? It is just a "social taboo", after all. Just like homosexuality was 50-70 years ago. In Rome, adults would marry children as young as 8. Think about it.

  • @draco0072 The vast majority of gays are Not pedophiles, nor do they engage in beastiality. I'm a little embarrassed for you because somebody had to tel you this.

  • @romanrazors I never said they were pedophiles or into beastiality. I meant, if we let gay marriage slide, in 10, 20, 30 years who knows what will be okay. If it is okay for homosexuals to marry one another, will someone please tell me why people shouldn't be able to marry animals or willing children, then? Also, "the vast majority..." is a good statement, but did you know that in a study taken last year of over 876,000 gays, the majority were sexually abused... as young children?

  • @draco0072 in regards to your "who knows what will be ok?" question, i should very well hope politicians arent stupid enough to let people marry horses or 9-year-olds. beastiality and pedophilia are against the law because even if the child consents, its still going to fuck em up in the long run. animals cant consent, but theyve been known to show signs of mental disturbance after an act of beastiality. the actual act of being gay doesnt hurt anyone, so whats the big deal?

  • @TheSunshineNetwork Well, you have a good point. I mean, things that are frowned upon by one generation, no matter how "wrong" they are, never become acceptable, right...? Oh wait... That's not true. Marriage, what is the definition again? If something isn't natural, then why should it be allowed? Okay, so pedophilia and beastiality cause harm, what is wrong with necrophilia, then? When gays can get married, people should be able to have sex with dead bodies, huh?

  • @draco0072 oh wow, twisting what im saying, nice way to get more idiots to side with you. my main point is that gay marrige DOESNT HARM OTHERS. necrophilia: disrespectful to the dead, extremely unhygenic, and, overall, really creepy. pedophilia/zoophilia: known to have extreme negative mental impact.

    the definition of marriage is, in most religions, between a man and a woman. however, there is a little law about separation of church and state, which means marriage really isnt the govts business

  • @TheSunshineNetwork "Necrophilia: Disrespectful(opinion), Extremely unhygenic(So is anal sex, so point invalid in this argument), and, overall, really creepy(Opinion, there are people who would say the same about gay sex)"

    Is that about right? Your argument against necrophilia suffers... Ouch for you. Science and research have proven that anal sex, performed on females or males is HARMFUL to the receiving party. So, yeah, it kinda DOES HARM OTHERS.

  • @draco0072 There are much worse things that harm people. So go complain about that.

  • @burkey0307 Nah way, bro, nah way

    

  • @draco0072 youre right, anal sex is unhygenic. difference is, you dont have to break into a cemetary, kill someone, and/or stash a dead body in your home in order to have anal sex with a living person. i'll admit, my argument against necrophilia was weak.

    something im having a really hard time understanding is, if youre so against gay marriage and the ilk, why did you go to a video in which a comedian talks about gay marriage? it almost seems as if you came here just to complain -_-

  • @TheSunshineNetwork You're right... You got me...

  • @draco0072 for the record, i dont generally put up such a vehement argument. im just glad we could reach an agreement.

  • @draco0072 Where do we draw the line? When it tramples the other party's will. There's a reason why gays should be able to marry yet zoophiles and pedophiles will never been accepted. Two gays in consensual love marries = no one's harmed. Can an animal give consent? No, they react on instincts. They can't testify in court if its forced. Can a child make life-changing decisions for themselves? No, their minds are easily manipulated. They're not physically or mentally ready. That's the difference.

  • @areyoukidding I am just saying, look at history. A lot of modern people like to think, for some stupid reason, that we are so very different from our ancestors. We're not. Gay people shouldn't be allowed to get married. That is my view. With the way America's morality is being brought down into the gutter, i promise you, disgusting things are going to start happening. If we let gay marriage slide, we won't have any real argument against perverted things, like necrophilia, etc etc

  • @draco0072 I facepalmed at your response.

    Like I stated in my last comment, it's a matter of the two parties free will being trampled upon. A dead corpse, a dog or a kid IS NOT capable of giving consent to the sexual act, therefore, it's wrong. Two gay guys can, they're not harming anyone; there should be no problem unless you're one of those nosy individuals who like to stick your nose into other people's live.

  • @draco0072 CONT. In Han China, gay marriage was legalized for a short period of time, all Han emperors with the exception of one were bisexual. In ancient Greece & Rome, the relationship between an older & a younger male was widely accepted. A lot of Greco-Roman mythological gods were bisexual. Alexander the Great of the Hellenistic Age was a bisexual himself. In ancient Egypt, Pharaohs more often than not have eunuch. You're right, we're not that different, but we're more tolerant.

  • @areyoukidding Correct, but did you know that right before alexander the great began to conquer persia, he had an 11 year old lover? Yes we should be completely tolerant of that, right? Also, technically speaking, anal sex has been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN to cause harm to the receiving party. So, yeah, they are harming people. I am just saying, gay people have civil rights, marriage is between a man and a woman. In the DICTIONARY. Make up another word. Keep marriage SACRED.

  • @draco0072 Lol get off Youtube.

  • @burkey0307 WHAT?!?! HOW YOU GONNA COME AT ME LIKE THAT, BRO?!?!?!

  • @draco0072 It's 2011 bro. Get over it.

  • @burkey0307 Yeah, and in 2041 when people can do all kinds of perverse things, we'll all just get over it, right? No.

  • @draco0072 You can't see the future. Stop using that to base your argument on. It's 2011 and people are already doing all kinds of perverse things, but does anyone care? No, it doesn't affect you, it's not ruining anybody's lives except maybe their own depending on what it is. Live your life how you want to and leave other people alone.

  • @burkey0307 Shoot, you're right. People who kill their families or innocent people aren't so bad, i mean look guys, it's 2011! No one cares!!! Anarchy, bitch, apparently that's what burkey wants! WOOHOO!!!!

  • @draco0072 Obviously you've run dry in this argument and you had to take everything I've said out of context to be able to continue this pointless discussion. Murdering is against the law, and morally wrong, Being gay is not.

  • @burkey0307 No, i haven't. My main point is this, my morals say, gay marriage is not okay. The "morality" of today's world is corrupt. Where does it stop? That is my question. 100 years ago, would gay marriage even be a question? No, because it was SOOO taboo. Now, however, it is acceptable and no one questions it. So, 100 years from now, who is to say zoo-necro-pedophilia won't be accepted? And yes, i am against that and to me, there is no difference.

  • @draco0072 You aren't going to be alive. So who cares. 100 years ago it was acceptable to have a black man as a slave, obviously it's not anymore. The world evolves, get over it and stop being so close minded.

  • @burkey0307 Oh, so you hate black people? You're ignorant, 100 years ago it WASN'T acceptable to have a black man as a slave. Good job.

  • @draco0072 Does it matter how long ago it was? Obviously it was longer than 100 years I was just using that as an arbitrary number like you did. You still havent rebutted my argument. So i'm going to assume you can't and therefore you are just a moron like I originally thought.

  • @burkey0307 part 2: If you were to look back throughout history, you would find that every society had something that one would view as wrong. The Spartans from Greece practiced infanticide and genetic cleansing. The Spainards practiced religious genocide and removed the Jews and Muslims from their country, at the detriment of their own society. Many indigenous Native cultures of South America sacrificed living people to please their gods. So it seems that modern society is no more fucked up.

  • @draco0072 wait ur saying that society had morals in the first place? What lie have u been living in? too busy getting hopped up on fox news and the bible to be living in the real world.

  • @draco0072 Your morals say gay marriage is not ok? Then your morals are baseless and make no sense. What's immoral about gays getting married?

  • @draco0072 There is a difference. Gay marriage is consensual. Both members of the party are in agreement whereas animals, dead people, and victims of rape have no say and are NOT in agreement. Gay marriage is hurting no one. All the things you listed hurt someone. That's the difference and you're ignorant and clearly warped with a convoluted way of thinking. Prejudice against things like this is usually something you're taught... you've obviously had a teacher who made quite and impact on you.

  • @draco0072 Okay. If you think gay marriage is wrong, or not okay as you put it. That's fine. I think picking your nose and eating your boogers is not okay because its unsanitary and i find it a bit disgusting. However, if one chose to dig for gold and consume their nose by-products then by-all means, let them. I'm not the one doing it so I'm not too concerned about it. Now, you also state that the morality of today's world is corrupt. You are correct. There are many things that are fucked up.

  • @draco0072 Part 3: Lastly, it seems like Gay marriage IS being questioned due to the high ranking it has on political agendas and the coverage everybody is giving it. Homosexuality may have been taboo a hundred years ago but now it seems to have moved from taboo to ostracization because nobody can agree to legalize it and then let it be. Homosexuality isn't like murder where there is an overwhelming majority opposed to it. Rather, it seems, very few people are opposed.

  • ''some faggot just fucked me right in the ass, seriously!'' hahhahaha

  • Funny stuff

  • Pestilence and petulant are different things you louis!

  • "Your honor THEY'RE FUCK'N QUEEEEAH!!!.........THEY'RE FUCK'N QUEEEAH!!!"

  • hahahahahaha ahhh the classic laugh at 0:40 and 0:43 made me laugh the hardest

  • Hmm. I was with him until he used the word faggot.

  • @Juno36 Get over it. If you watched any of his stuff you would know none of it is derogatory. He opens his stand up special "Chewed Up" talking about it.

    If you are too politically correct and uptight to handle the word "faggot" "nigger" or "cunt", you are the person the rest of us are laughing at. As Louis would say, stop being such a faggot.

  • @JyginsGreenBird I was actually thinking more of the fact that he was giving a spiel on what many people would say are equal rights for gays, and then used the word faggot. I know very well he's a comedian, and seeing as how you know absolutely nothing about me, you wouldn't know how far from "politically correct and uptight" I am. I was just thinking that him using the word faggot threw off what could have been used as a decent point to show people who feel as though homosexuality is a problem.

  • @Juno36 If you weren't all PC, then the word wouldn't have thrown you. You miss the point of it- 'faggot' is a word that he's using to take the power out of it- there is NO malice behind it when he says it. He also uses the word "cunt' a lot, but he talks about how brilliant he thinks women are. He is not using them in a negative manner, therefore he is nullifying the negativity. It's YOUR fault that you put the negative on faggot, not his. That's his whole point when he uses it!

  • @JyginsGreenBird (sigh) Please, just stop. I really don't feel like arguing about this, and I can tell it doesn't matter what I say, because you have what you want branded into your brain. Like I said, I know very well he's a comedian and, as a matter of fact, he's one of my favorites. I just feel that, even if only for that moment, he could have laid off on the word faggot. He didn't. My feelings on it change nothing. I fully understand why he said what he said when he said.

  • @Juno36 Jesus christ, the only reason he said it is because he already made a joke about how pointless the word faggot is.

  • @TokyoMystify Holy shit. If I was Louis C.K., I would be impressed by how loyal my fans are, finding my every joke hilarious and worth trying to elaborate to every single person who feels differently, until they feel the same. I would also be a little dismayed by the seeming inability/unwillingness of my fans to fucking read something fully before they decide to comment on something. I didn't like the fucking joke. Is that a problem?

  • @Juno36 " I didn't like the fucking joke. Is that a problem?" That's all you had to say, instead of all that crap.

  • @TokyoMystify Which goes back to what would be my dismay at finding out my fans' inability/unwillingness to read, because if you read the back and forth me and Jygins had, before you replied, you would have gathered that much.

  • @Juno36 Not when you get into details avoiding the point. 

  • @Juno36

    Shut the fuck up, nobody cares if you don't like the joke you fucking attention-whore hipster.

  • thank u 9gag for showing me this wonderful person xD

  • This guy is getting really good at comedy. Dare I say moving toward a Bill Hicksian level...

  • who the fuck cares about your shitty kid he's probably a fagot anyway

  • @KCThomas84 Not cool, man. You just misspelled "faggot"? What's wrong with today's teenagers?? Back when I called people faggots and cunts on the internet because I was bored in school, I at least fucking spelled the shit right. And there was no spell check either.

  • @SketchyBack I'm so sorry and thank you so much for correcting me. The funny thing is it's not like I accidentally hit one g instead of two while quickly typing a comment. I simply have had no idea how to spell the word for my entire life. Your constructive criticism has been fantastic and it has taught me a valuable grammatical lesson that I will never forget. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

  • They ruined his new pants, man!

  • @windymemo More like, gave them a sense of style and popularity.

  • lol classic..."I hope he blows his dog"

  • thanks for uploading it !!! I've been searching for it for the longest time!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more