Added: 2 years ago
From: Hakkun9872
Views: 32,205
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (164)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WTF?

  • 35 million kills gets Susaku the Urkel Award : "Did I do that?"

  • ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED

    35,000,000 KILLS: "All CoD fanboys got pwned"

  • Possible titles for that achievement also include:

    Finally Snapped: 35,000,000 pts.

    Stopped Being a Wishy-Washy Pansy: 35,000,000 pts.

  • @mobiusdiablo my ideas for the achievement title:

    It's ok, no one will miss them: 35,000,000 kills

    Hate the creator not the shooter: 35,000,000 kills

    Ah fuck now im a major hypocrite: 35,000,000 kills

    Holy fuckin balls Nina!? WTF?!: 35,000,000 kills

    It's zero's fault I swear! The geass he used on me made me doit!: 35,000,000 kills

    and my personal favorite...

    Euphy would be proud: 35,000,000 kills

  • @IVISMiLESIVI My personal choice would be:

    "Euphy would be proud".:D

  • @Hakkun9872 You love it cuz it's so wrong huh? >:D

  • DA FUCK IS WITH LONG COMMENT RESPONSES??

  • if this is Modern Warfare, he must have a ton of nukes by now

  • Is it wrong that I got about tripple his kill record in two minutes in Armored Core: For Answer? One minute thirty seconds. 100 million kills. No WMDs used.

  • Kill-tacular...

  • Press six. Do it. You know you want to... c(=

  • that was "Suzaku Kamehameha" :))))

  • Haha. x)

  • This is awesome in a very horrible way.

  • i get this kill streak at least 5 times a day and sometimes i hear distant explosions and flashes of lights when it happens

  • fuckin stupid video

  • Suzaku,top master gamer h4x0r of the universe!

  • there were 35 million people in one city???

  • @RyanBrooksby present-day Tokyo metropolitan area has ~36,000,000 people. So, yeah, there were that many people.

  • now that's what i call a kill streak!!!!!!! 35,000,000 KILLS to unlock...... (me playing cod trying to do this)

  • WTF! i want an XBox like that!!!

  • 3600 degree spinzaku noscope headshot.

  • i need this achievement!

    how many mw2 tactical nukes equal a FLEJA?

  • @superl82nd who knows,probably over 9000 XD I just had to put that in.

  • i get this achievement 21 times a day

  • GRATZ SUZAKU-KUN!!!!! oh wait. thats not a good thing is it? oh well who cares.

  • 0:20 -> EPIC FACE =D

  • Because mass murder is a laughing matter lol

  • It's over 35.000.000!

  • Creepy.

  • Over 1 million! D:

    If only this was an Achievement in Armored Core: for Answer. :(

  • LOL

  • 1 watch video

    2pause

    3unpause

    4hold 9 continously

    5.......

  • 35.000.000 kils: genocide. LOL

    

  • i don't think this counts as genocide as those in the blast radius were destroyed indiscriminately

  • Ummm.....This may sound..odd....but I have the exact same reaction when I get an achievement like that....

  • his K/D is off the charts

  • ...it's over 9000.

  • the lol was awesome.

  • SUZAKU KURURUGI: King of Xbox Nation

  • A Japanese person using an Xbox. RIIIIIIGHT.

  • the title made me laugh so hard and then vid topped it... well done sir, well done *appluads*

  • xDDDd COULD NOT STOP LAUGHING!!

  • I gotta play with him in modern warfare 2. TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING!!!

  • fucking lol'd

  • Please add the Achievement Unlocked sound!

  • When the screen faded black, I was half expecting a *ba-dink* sound.

  • well nina invented the fleya,so she gets al suzaku's kill s and schneizel's and nunnally's kills...

  • You're my hero for making this XD

  • I thought the video ended but then the laugh came up so I started dying xD

  • Everyone's a little guilty here: Suzaku kinda, sorta, not really fired that thing. Lelouch placed the 'live' geass on Suzaku causing him to do this. But there was no way Lelouch could have predicted this. Nina made it, but she did not fire it. Schneizel got it in a position to be shot. The people in Tokyo were there. There's blame for everyone; it's called 'war.'

  • @NxRevived

    the introduction (and USE) of nukes pretty much invalided lelouch's entire terrorism insanity by default.

    it was already an insanity when Euphie wanted to begin the negotiations/diplomacy tables with the special administration zones which Lelouch accidentally (though not entirely unintentionally) turned into a Slaughter House Bloodbath.

    No Mercy, absolute 100% Ruthlessness : Underdogs can't win.

  • @ffalloutgirl I don't see how that has anything to do with my comment. Nor do I understand what you're trying to say.

  • @NxRevived

    just me agreeing and reinforcing your argument that this is indeed "WAR" and it's hellish.

    Suzaku was pragmatic enough to recognize that and joined the Britannian Military.

  • @ffalloutgirl An argument is not war; it's an argument. Speaking of which, I don't know why we are arguing.

  • @NxRevived Actually, it's called 'Team Deathmatch' nowadays.

  • @NxRevived Well, Lelouch knew Britannia had WMDs, Suzaku told him earlier. He also could have anticipated a sufficiently devious person who knew about the "live" Geass putting said WMD on the lancelot. Then again, considering how monumentally evil, insane, and most importantly stupid/pointless nuking your own city would be, you can't really blame him for thinking that Schnizel wouldn't really do it, since he didn't know about his "nuke the world, become (a) God, ???, profit" plan.

  • @SteelFyire its not stupid, Schneizel did have a reason for nuking cities

  • @kyuubiyura Let me rephrase that then. Scheizel was batshit crazy (but in a subtle way), and decided that killing billions of people to force the world to submit to his rule was a good plan to bring about world peace.

  • @kyuubiyura Plus, nuking your own city is stupid in the same way the Death Star, Exterminatus, ect are monumentally stupid plans of action in Space Operas: You loose a massive, massive amount of resources, and are more likely to unite everyone against you than you are to get them to submit to you. Maybe if Lelouch hadn't been suicidally depressed by the time he seized the throne, he would've though of a plan like that, you know, one that didn't involve millions of deaths.

  • @SteelFyire but i agree with Schneizel. pain is one feeling that everyone is afraid of, through pain compassion will come, and fear of the Damoclis would keep people in check. it would take a massive force to assault the damoclis, and they wouldnt have the resources for that once the Damoclis would destroy the major cities. im afraid you misunderstood much. Lelouche was never suicidally depressed, it was his plan from the very beginning, the zero requiem. although it doesnt seem too effective

  • @kyuubiyura Damocles would do absolutely nothing to stop guerilla forces, terrorism. All they have to do is blend in with civilian populations, and eventually Schneizel runs out of people to nuke and is forced to throw in the towel. Or alternatively someone assassinates him (always a possibility for even the most paranoid leaders), and everything goes to hell as the world fights over control of the battlestation.

  • @SteelFyire terrorism? against whom? killing people you're trying to save?that makes no sense. there would be no terrorism, and they wouldnt be able to harm Damocles anyway.assassination isnt very probable, nobody was able to assassinate any of the other princes, only Lelouche who had geass. and after Schneizels rule is over, he could just finish up with Lelouche's plan and destroy the center of world hate-the Damocles. that would ensure at least a longer-lasting peace than Lelouches

  • @kyuubiyura I do agree that Lelouch's plan was even worse than Schneizel's, considering that his dear sister will probably be dead by the time the decades out when the UFN and ex-area colonies gang up on Britannia and burn it to the ground. (which is what would happen in a scenario like that in real life) But Schneizel's plan was pretty bad. It falls apart as soon as he steps off the Damocles (can you say attempted assassinations?) or dies of natural causes.

  • @SteelFyire And honestly, at least Lelouch left behind a somewhat functional international governing body and united the world against Britannia. The destruction of one nation is preferable to the clusterfuck that would follow Schneizel's death.

  • @SteelFyire Lelouches plan doesnt change anything, and the world united against Germany, but things arent peaceful now. after Schneizels rule would end, the scar of fear and pain would remain in the genes for at least about 3 generations, and that mass fear and pain is what would unite the world, and who knows, maybe in those 3 generations a better system would be created, led by compassion, instead of the everyone-for-himself system we have now

  • @kyuubiyura The problem with ruling by fear is that it creates hatred, not compassion. Hatred for the people abusing their power (and someone *will* abuse it), hatred for the ones who help enforce that group's rule, and finally, hatred for anyone who even tries to associate with either of the former in any manner. The same topic was discussed in Naruto, Bleach, Claymore, and many other prominent Anime. No matter how scared you make a body of people, they *will* find ways to fight you.

  • @kyuubiyura The deterioration of our current political/economic system is to be expected, given the greed and ignorance that permeates our social structure. In spite of this, the world is relatively "at peace" compared to, say, World War II. We still have genocides, we still have civil unrest, and we still have massive political corruption. But we've managed to avoid nuclear annihilation, and people are slowly realizing that greed doesn't benefit anyone - not even the rich.

  • @kyuubiyura The next few decades will be a true test of humanity's mettle; even moreso than many of the other pivotal moments in history. The result of the forthcoming struggle will be slow and painful, but just maybe we can forge a system better than capitalism or communism. You might wonder why I placed those two side by side. It's because for all their differences, they are effectively the same - a plan on paper that only serves to obfuscate the greed of the rulers governing said system.

  • @kyuubiyura Finally, why am I focusing so much on greed? Because, in spite of Schneizel's high intelligence, his greed caused him to overlook the most obvious flaw in his master plan. His method of ruling the world would cause people to hate him; as such, was doomed to failure regardless of whether or not he eliminated every opposing faction. They would organize against him again, because that's what people do. They get tired of tyranny, and rise up, to try and make tomorrow a better day.

  • @zatronium like i said, Schneizels plan is better than Lelouches, and if he ends it by using lelouches plan and destroying the center of world hate after decades of pain and hate towards it, then people will be already somewhat used to helping each other under fear and then will help each other to unite against the damoclis. and people will always be greedy, when they get the chance to earn some money by stepping on someone else, most people would take, because the core of society is egoism.

  • @kyuubiyura I was honestly hoping you wouldn't ignore everything I wrote to continue arguing, but I suppose that was expecting too much. TL;DR version: They will unite against the source of hatred, but only until it's gone. Afterward they would refocus their anger and resentment on eachother. Hatred breeds hatred, and pain breeds pain.

  • @zatronium i didnt ignore what you said, you either ignored me or misunderstood.i stated this several times already: by the end of Schneizels rule, which would most likely easily withstand any terrorist attack, the genes of the next generations will be different- people will think more about one another, being previously stimulated by fear. perhaps you remember in biology class, you were probably taught that animals can be trained by creating reflexes based on pain? same principle.

  • @kyuubiyura If anyone is misunderstanding here, it's not me. Your perception of human psychology is twisted and cruel, and your claims about genetics are false. Perhaps you remember reading about jails in your social studies class? That's where people who train animals with pain end up. Your genes do NOT change because you were subjected to fear and pain. Genes are inherited and can only be altered by abnormal processes.

  • @zatronium ...ever heard of Darwin?

  • @kyuubiyura Yeah, I've read plenty about him and his research. Evolutionary theory doesn't work for humans like it does for animals. Whereas an animal is likely to die due to disease or fighting, people can survive brain tumors thanks to modern medicine. Natural selection dictates that someone with a predisposition for cancer should die, but that often isn't the case. Again, your genes do not change because you were subjected to fear and pain.

  • @zatronium you're missing the point. if someone has cancer, then his genes are different, and his children are more likely to have it. whether they die of it or not has nothing to do with genetics. the conditions of life greatly impact the evolution of any creature, its a known fact. there are many countries where it can be seen more clearly, i can understand that americans wouldnt be able to imagine it. but for example, if an asian has a child, and he grows up in america, he wont have an accent

  • @kyuubiyura Except having an accent has nothing to do with genetics. The conditions of life impact a creature's genetic structure by allowing the proliferation of beneficial traits, and vice versa. However, most conditions (barring radiation and other pollutants) do not affect the genetic structure directly; this includes both the host creature and its offspring. Perhaps you should learn more about the subject before trying to "educate" someone else?

  • @zatronium and maybe accents were a bad example, but its a known fact that there are two influences on the development of a creature: the exo- and endo- world. like i said, you cant understand until you've seen the difference of the life in different countries yourself. why do you think there are such big differences? partially genetics, partially a stable and ancient culture that is sustained which influences the behavior of the countires citizens.

  • @zatronium and one more thing, stop being so arrogant, im not trying to educate anyone, im having a conversation.

  • @kyuubiyura I apologize if I came off as arrogant, but that was written in response to your assumption of my nationality, and this statement: "...wouldn't be able to imagine it." You've been making claims about genetics that are patiently false, and then you decide to claim that I don't have the intelligence to understand what you're talking about. What sort of response did you expect to receive?

  • @zatronium again, i didnt say you didnt have the intelligence to imagine, there are things even intelligent people cant fully imagine. accent is influenced by the speech heard by the person during his growth, just as hard life in a country that has suffered through a war can.developingchild.harvard.ed­u/index.php/resources/reports_­and_working_papers/working_pap­ers/wp10/

  • @kyuubiyura I already told you that it affects a person physically and psychologically, so why are you linking those? Changing the way a person's brain functions is different from changing their genetic structure. The first video clearly states that the brain's structure is built upon the genetic foundation, not vice versa. Also, I agree there are some things we can't yet imagine, but that's because we don't fully grasp the principles that lay the foundation for understanding them.

  • @kyuubiyura Back at the beginning of this discussion, if you were trying to tell me that a war would affect the populous psychologically, then I'd have to agree wholeheartedly. However, I must dissent and say (again) that the effect would not be an amicable one. War leads to hatred, and hatred leads to war. It takes a long time to break this cycle, but sustaining compassion and rebuffing avarice would eventually win out.

  • @kyuubiyura Actually, to build upon what you mentioned before, America's leaders provide a great example of what not to do. They preemptively strike countries with infrastructure-crippling attacks, and then leave the country worse off, in spite of supposedly installing democracy. As a result, people dislike Americans, because they elected the leaders who did it. If the tables were turned, nobody would come to their aid because of their prior actions.

  • @zatronium fine, i admit i might be wrong about offspring gene alteration through life-long experience of the father, ill ask a professional about that. and the idea of Schneizel (although more Nagato's(Pain)) was to bomb everyone. they will all hate him, not each other, they would even feel sorry for one another because they felt similar pain, and fear would ensure that.

  • @kyuubiyura Without going too much into detail, my understanding of the process is that the genes received by the child are a random selection between the father and mother, excluding any mutations. Though a lifelong experience will allow certain genes to prevail over others, those genes will likely be related to stress response, bodily function, etc., because people poorly equipped to handle such a situation die off first.

  • @zatronium i think mutations are included. behavior is determined partially by genes, is it not? the idea of Pain was to cause the world equal pain, which would bring understanding of each others feelings, and fear would control those who need more persuasion.

  • @kyuubiyura Mutations result from various processes, such as radiation, "free radicals," or just a basic failure of the cell to copy the gene correctly when dividing. That's why I said "excluding mutations," because they are random changes, and therefore aren't relevant. You can't cause a mutation that makes people more cooperative without altering the genetic code directly. You can create an environment that prefers such a trait, but pain and fear don't create such an environment.

  • @kyuubiyura For example, we already use fear and pain to control crime. Retaliation, jail, and maybe even execution are the perils that await wrongdoers. In spite of our attempts to punish criminals, crime still occurs. In fact, many studies have shown that criminals who receive rehabilitation are less likely to become repeat offenders. What makes you think more fear and pain would produce a better result, when we already have proof to the contrary?

  • @zatronium jail isnt enough pain for some, neither is the fear of it for them. they commit crime because they gain more than they lose in most cases if they already chose their path in life. if retaliation was death for most crimes, then there would be a lot less of them. ideally, equal global pain would mean pain in different forms but in same amounts.sure there are nutcases who enjoy pain or are apathetic, but they are basically sociopaths and should receive mental rehab.or shot if dangerous

  • @kyuubiyura Then again, there are some people who are impossible to rehabilitate, because our version of punishment is their version of enjoyment. Because we don't fully understand the human mind, it isn't currently possible to fully explain why this occurs. However, consider for a moment Stockholm Syndrome, where the captured begins to have affection for the captor. To your average individual, this is crazy, but it's merely an example of the human mind trying to survive.

  • @kyuubiyura If someone is tortured enough, it seems logical to conclude that the human mind might start to find torture enjoyable. The same goes for fear, hatred, and any other sort of "negative" human emotion. If a person finds pleasure in such things, who knows what atrocities they might commit to increase their enjoyment? Hence why increasing the fear and pain is not a good thing; it may also increase camaraderie, but will almost certainly promote psychopathic behavior.

  • @zatronium well pain and fear to the point of madness isnt the idea, the idea is an amount that would stimulate behavior

  • @kyuubiyura How do you draw the line between action that creates desired behavior and action that creates insanity? People have different thresholds for mental stability, so something that might make one person crazy could have absolutely no effect on another. Even death for crimes isn't a catch-all solution, because the system governing justice is flawed itself.

  • @zatronium its actually not that hard to draw that line. yes, different people have different thresholds, but the pain mustn't be at a level that isnt life-destroying, but rather a scar that will remind of it and of what others felt as well

  • @kyuubiyura For example, this excerpt is an actual law in Texas, USA: "When two railroad trains meet at a crossing, each shall stop and neither shall proceed until the other has passed." That's absolutely ridiculous, yet it's still on the books. (according to legalzoom) If the system is inexact, and the method is inexact, but an exact response is required from both, then clearly fear and pain isn't a viable solution.

  • @kyuubiyura That said, it's just as impossible to expect people to magically start behaving responsibly and charitably. However, there is something that we haven't fully exploited yet: Education. It has been a stabilizing force for centuries; it helped usurp religion's position as a unquestionable entity, provided the means for *many* revolutions, created disparage toward the slave trade, and was an important force in the women's movement.

  • @zatronium its not magic, its basically a humans own egoism and fear of pain that will help. at least it would work partially, i dont see how lelouches plan changes anything at all. as for education, there is a fine line there too, there is a point where people think "ugh im tired of this, w.e. just want to get out of here". if you think about it, then its fear that keeps them in there, fear of not having a job in the future. for some people its about doing what they love ofc

  • @kyuubiyura Actually, I'm not arguing in favor or either of their "plans" because both were using war to some extent. Lelouch's plan mirrored the views of an unifying expansionist, while his brother's plan utilized raw oppression. I'm saying that through education, we can dispel some of the worst attributes of our society. For example, if a person recognizes that other humans are fundamentally the same as they are, they wouldn't think of using them as slaves in the first place.

  • @kyuubiyura Education isn't just about what you learn, but also about how you view things, and how your views impact your opinions. A religious person is apt to cite god as the reason why their house burnt down, while a more educated thinker would realize that faulty wiring in the wall is a more likely culprit.

  • @kyuubiyura When I said "magically" I meant it as an illustrative adjective, to stress that I don't expect the opposite approach to be amazingly effective either. Some people push for a "Utopia" state, and I know that sort of thing is impossible for the moment. As long as we take little steps toward our goals, they will eventually be realized; though the wait may be long and difficult. Instead, society is slowly heading back to the middle ages, whilst ignorance and greed prevail.

  • @zatronium im sorry but imo you're completely wrong here. if a person knows that hes having a good life thanks to a slave, for example, he wont care anyway, because, like i said, the core of modern society is ego. the average person wouldnt deny himself of a pleasure, even if he knows that it is at the expense of someone else. it took an entire war to stop slavery, which seems to be an obvious no-no.nowadays its harder to trace, even when roommates take my damn stuff without ever asking

  • @kyuubiyura If a person knows he can have a better life thanks to technology, why would he pick the slave? I got a little too idealistic for a bit, it's a fault of mine. ;) The point is that advancing society benefits everyone, while greed *appears* to benefit one person. But in reality, by being greedy, they are actually holding society as a whole back. In doing so, they're ironically disadvantaging themselves in the process.

  • @zatronium i grew up in a country where greed is the driving force of all. i know how their mind works, it starts like "well, if i do it only once, whats the big deal"->"first time didnt hurt, it seems ok, nobody will know"->other people"damn thieves, why can they steal and not me?i want to get stuff as well, its their fault"->country-screwed.everyb­ody knows theyre screwing things up, but they only care about themselves.fear of retribution would control them at least somewhat.

  • @kyuubiyura We won't ever entirely eliminate greed, but by showing others what they're missing out on, we can channel that negative influence in a positive direction. Many dictators have used education to instill ignorance and control, and indeed religious institutions do the same. I suppose schools could mimic this technique, but aim for compassion and understanding. However, I'd like to think that a properly educated public would eventually come to this realization themselves.

  • @zatronium as for education, that is under threat as well, the new generation thinks its too cool for school, they are too used to easy life. i have theory, that humanity will not endlessly develop, it will reach a peak, where its laziness and good conditions of life will hold them back from getting smarter. at the same time there will be countries with bad conditions of life, but they wont be able to get a proper education there

  • @kyuubiyura Well, that's less of a theory and more of a reality. Whether or not we've reached that peak has yet to be seen, but right now the house of cards seems to be crumbling. It's only a matter of time before something happens, and when it does, it's going to be earth shattering. Whether or not that ends up being a literal interpretation also remains to be seen. ;P

  • @zatronium who knows, maybe a new and better government system will arise from the ashes? doubtful, but i guess theres nothing to lose. theres also another risk with education-the smarter a person is, the more he realizes what he can achieve,and by achieve most people mean money. they become more ambitious, often ready to step on others to get what they want. the problem with education is that in the end, the student decides anyway, usually hes still egoistic.that why i believe its time to force

  • @kyuubiyura People always get more accomplished when they work as a team. Leaders recognize that, but they also realize that your average individual doesn't want to work together. As a result, we have many organizational layouts that we use to force people to work along side one another. If everybody had a high I.Q., then you're right, they would want to step on others to get what they want. However, they would also realize that they'd get more accomplished if they worked together.

  • @kyuubiyura The result is that people band together to work on projects without necessitating one of these "control structures," for example, a corporation. This effect is very apparent in the programming community, where coders work together on large open-source projects for little or no ROI. They realize that everyone (including them) benefits from their work, so they don't have a problem doing it for free.

  • @kyuubiyura As for the governmental issue, I think that once we get the flaws in internet security ironed out, we could leverage the internet as a means reducing corruption. For example (though not a perfect one), a power structure could be created where laws are only written in simple terms (i.e. no legalese) and citizens would have a period of time to vote for or against laws. This takes the power out of the hands of a few, which drastically reduces the influence of a cabal.

  • @kyuubiyura However, humanity has fallen before from the heights of civilization before. The roman empire's defeat and subsequent "medieval period" that followed could be viewed as a particularly famous failure. We still managed to put ourselves in a precarious position, but we're better off than back then. I'd like to think that we can find it within ourselves to keep moving forward, rather than throwing it into reverse and returning to feudalism, or worse, annihilating ourselves.

  • @zatronium yeah, chances are that countries will instead think of ways they can improve their own wealth after a global catastrophe.anyway, its been fun, have a good day

  • @kyuubiyura Fuck, I made a bad typo. That's what I get for failing to proofread. I've enjoyed chatting with you, thanks for providing such an excellent series of counterarguments. Gotta go for now though, later.

  • @kyuubiyura It's funny you mention Nagato, because that character struggled with the same concept. He was empowered to choose between continuing the cycle of hatred, or possibly breaking it by reversing the damage he'd already caused. Naruto Shippuden doesn't discuss the genetic and socioeconomic ramifications of such a thing, being a shonen anime. However, the author still did a wonderful job of displaying how our beliefs and choices affect us and the people with whom we interact.

  • @kyuubiyura Emotions, though based in genetics, are not dictated by genetics alone. A person who has endured fear or pain at the hands of another is likely to commit similar acts themselves; this is very apparent in the case of certain types of crime. But we are empowered to make decisions that change our surroundings in more ways than one. So why would a person consciously choose to amplify the animosity that already exists? Why not choose something different - something amicable?

  • @kyuubiyura I find it amusing that you assume I'm American and that I don't understand simple concepts like evolution. When faced with an opinion that differs from yours, the first reaction should be to evaluate it's worth, rather than dismissively attach denigrations to feeble attempts at disproving their stance. When I first read your post, I thought you might enjoy a discourse on psychology and sociology. Hence why I thought you ignored me; your stubborn response was unexpected.

  • @kyuubiyura Finally, to wrap up the discussion about accents, an Asian growing up in America *will* have an accent. The reason is because every human that speaks has an accent, but they do not recognize it as an accent due to their familiarity with the linguistic style. If a language is pronounced in more than one way, it has more than one accent. Accents are not distinguished by nationality or race, but most often by locale. Ergo, accents are not caused by genetic changes.

  • @zatronium im not saying you dont understand evolution, im just saying that you dont understand the impacts on genes by the fear and pain , for example, caused by war. trust me, ive been to many different countries, i saw the differences. and you are wrong about the accents, ive lived with americans who have asian blood, and they had no asian(emphasis) accent at all, but their parents do. i can provide many more examples from personal experience. how do you think people evolved from apes?

  • @kyuubiyura War has an effect on both a person's psyche and physical health. However, war itself does not directly alter your genetic makeup. What you are seeing is the psychological and physical toll that war takes upon its victims; that sentiment can be passed down through generations. However, just because something has a long lasting effect, does not mean it was caused by a change in genetics. That is the effect of education at work, knowledge passed down through generations.

  • @kyuubiyura I can appreciate that you refined your claim to better facilitate the actual meaning of an accent. However, that doesn't make me "wrong" about accents. They are not a result of genetic differences, because if they were, we would be stuck with the same accent our entire lives. People are able to change their speech styles at will (though it requires some practice to mimic a different accent), and therefore aren't bound to their accent by genetic code.

  • @kyuubiyura Plus, nuclear deterrence only lasts until other people get ICBMs, then you've got MAD, which is never something a sane person wants.

  • The editing of the laugh at 0:31 is so cheesy it's actually funny

  • MUST....GET...ACHIEVEMENT....

  • M-M-M-MULTIKILL!

  • @Hakkun9872 Where are the 1400000 nukes AFTER the first one?

    Bonus Points if you get it

  • BEST PART!!! 0:31

  • Suzaku > Hitler

  • 0:27

  • shoulda made it a little longer

  • :0

  • Suzaku beats Hitler.

  • @LinkDarklinkOnilink Edit : 9 players that counted in his kills. (the 9 dislikes)

  • @LinkDarklinkOnilink make that 11

  • Comment removed

  • @LinkDarklinkOnilink yea he made hitler look like a chump

  • Great Vid!

    What was the music used?

  • I added it to the description.

  • @Hakkun9872 thank you!

  • lol

  • KILLIONAIRE! x3,500,000!!!

  • Didn'y he kill 25 million? Not 35 million?

  • @9maria91 it was 35 million

  • It's epic..i wish code geass is in xbox 360!!! i would play it!!!!!!

  • all i can say:

    ... killing frenzy?

  • This is just epic.... both in the misunderstandings it COULD lead to (for those who have never seen Code Geass) and the fact that lucky SoB gets the achievement I can't get EVER by simply being ordered to live....

    I know its not a real achievement, but wouldn't it be awesome if it was.... aside from the whole "genocide" thing.

  • @Hakkun9872 how was that Suzaku's fault?

  • I'd laugh like a madman too if I got an achievment like that.

  • that was an achievement alright laugh now hahahha

  • when Suzaku laughs..he looks like he's in pain

  • Lulz,soulcalibur at the end,Nice vid man

  • makes you wonder if he's happy that he got the achievement or sad that he got it

  • Lelouch lost his highscore :(

  • .... this was on my birthday also epic

  • more like hitliers greatests xbox achiviment

  • @pigcow4 Hitler's can't, he got banned. Look up "Hitler gets banned from Xbox Live " on youtube. It's true.

  • Oh lol the laugh part was epic.

  • lmao

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more