Is it wrong that I got about tripple his kill record in two minutes in Armored Core: For Answer? One minute thirty seconds. 100 million kills. No WMDs used.
Everyone's a little guilty here: Suzaku kinda, sorta, not really fired that thing. Lelouch placed the 'live' geass on Suzaku causing him to do this. But there was no way Lelouch could have predicted this. Nina made it, but she did not fire it. Schneizel got it in a position to be shot. The people in Tokyo were there. There's blame for everyone; it's called 'war.'
the introduction (and USE) of nukes pretty much invalided lelouch's entire terrorism insanity by default.
it was already an insanity when Euphie wanted to begin the negotiations/diplomacy tables with the special administration zones which Lelouch accidentally (though not entirely unintentionally) turned into a Slaughter House Bloodbath.
No Mercy, absolute 100% Ruthlessness : Underdogs can't win.
@NxRevived Well, Lelouch knew Britannia had WMDs, Suzaku told him earlier. He also could have anticipated a sufficiently devious person who knew about the "live" Geass putting said WMD on the lancelot. Then again, considering how monumentally evil, insane, and most importantly stupid/pointless nuking your own city would be, you can't really blame him for thinking that Schnizel wouldn't really do it, since he didn't know about his "nuke the world, become (a) God, ???, profit" plan.
@kyuubiyura Let me rephrase that then. Scheizel was batshit crazy (but in a subtle way), and decided that killing billions of people to force the world to submit to his rule was a good plan to bring about world peace.
@kyuubiyura Plus, nuking your own city is stupid in the same way the Death Star, Exterminatus, ect are monumentally stupid plans of action in Space Operas: You loose a massive, massive amount of resources, and are more likely to unite everyone against you than you are to get them to submit to you. Maybe if Lelouch hadn't been suicidally depressed by the time he seized the throne, he would've though of a plan like that, you know, one that didn't involve millions of deaths.
@SteelFyire but i agree with Schneizel. pain is one feeling that everyone is afraid of, through pain compassion will come, and fear of the Damoclis would keep people in check. it would take a massive force to assault the damoclis, and they wouldnt have the resources for that once the Damoclis would destroy the major cities. im afraid you misunderstood much. Lelouche was never suicidally depressed, it was his plan from the very beginning, the zero requiem. although it doesnt seem too effective
@kyuubiyura Damocles would do absolutely nothing to stop guerilla forces, terrorism. All they have to do is blend in with civilian populations, and eventually Schneizel runs out of people to nuke and is forced to throw in the towel. Or alternatively someone assassinates him (always a possibility for even the most paranoid leaders), and everything goes to hell as the world fights over control of the battlestation.
@SteelFyire terrorism? against whom? killing people you're trying to save?that makes no sense. there would be no terrorism, and they wouldnt be able to harm Damocles anyway.assassination isnt very probable, nobody was able to assassinate any of the other princes, only Lelouche who had geass. and after Schneizels rule is over, he could just finish up with Lelouche's plan and destroy the center of world hate-the Damocles. that would ensure at least a longer-lasting peace than Lelouches
@kyuubiyura I do agree that Lelouch's plan was even worse than Schneizel's, considering that his dear sister will probably be dead by the time the decades out when the UFN and ex-area colonies gang up on Britannia and burn it to the ground. (which is what would happen in a scenario like that in real life) But Schneizel's plan was pretty bad. It falls apart as soon as he steps off the Damocles (can you say attempted assassinations?) or dies of natural causes.
@SteelFyire And honestly, at least Lelouch left behind a somewhat functional international governing body and united the world against Britannia. The destruction of one nation is preferable to the clusterfuck that would follow Schneizel's death.
@SteelFyire Lelouches plan doesnt change anything, and the world united against Germany, but things arent peaceful now. after Schneizels rule would end, the scar of fear and pain would remain in the genes for at least about 3 generations, and that mass fear and pain is what would unite the world, and who knows, maybe in those 3 generations a better system would be created, led by compassion, instead of the everyone-for-himself system we have now
@kyuubiyura The problem with ruling by fear is that it creates hatred, not compassion. Hatred for the people abusing their power (and someone *will* abuse it), hatred for the ones who help enforce that group's rule, and finally, hatred for anyone who even tries to associate with either of the former in any manner. The same topic was discussed in Naruto, Bleach, Claymore, and many other prominent Anime. No matter how scared you make a body of people, they *will* find ways to fight you.
@kyuubiyura The deterioration of our current political/economic system is to be expected, given the greed and ignorance that permeates our social structure. In spite of this, the world is relatively "at peace" compared to, say, World War II. We still have genocides, we still have civil unrest, and we still have massive political corruption. But we've managed to avoid nuclear annihilation, and people are slowly realizing that greed doesn't benefit anyone - not even the rich.
@kyuubiyura The next few decades will be a true test of humanity's mettle; even moreso than many of the other pivotal moments in history. The result of the forthcoming struggle will be slow and painful, but just maybe we can forge a system better than capitalism or communism. You might wonder why I placed those two side by side. It's because for all their differences, they are effectively the same - a plan on paper that only serves to obfuscate the greed of the rulers governing said system.
@kyuubiyura Finally, why am I focusing so much on greed? Because, in spite of Schneizel's high intelligence, his greed caused him to overlook the most obvious flaw in his master plan. His method of ruling the world would cause people to hate him; as such, was doomed to failure regardless of whether or not he eliminated every opposing faction. They would organize against him again, because that's what people do. They get tired of tyranny, and rise up, to try and make tomorrow a better day.
@zatronium like i said, Schneizels plan is better than Lelouches, and if he ends it by using lelouches plan and destroying the center of world hate after decades of pain and hate towards it, then people will be already somewhat used to helping each other under fear and then will help each other to unite against the damoclis. and people will always be greedy, when they get the chance to earn some money by stepping on someone else, most people would take, because the core of society is egoism.
@kyuubiyura I was honestly hoping you wouldn't ignore everything I wrote to continue arguing, but I suppose that was expecting too much. TL;DR version: They will unite against the source of hatred, but only until it's gone. Afterward they would refocus their anger and resentment on eachother. Hatred breeds hatred, and pain breeds pain.
@zatronium i didnt ignore what you said, you either ignored me or misunderstood.i stated this several times already: by the end of Schneizels rule, which would most likely easily withstand any terrorist attack, the genes of the next generations will be different- people will think more about one another, being previously stimulated by fear. perhaps you remember in biology class, you were probably taught that animals can be trained by creating reflexes based on pain? same principle.
@kyuubiyura If anyone is misunderstanding here, it's not me. Your perception of human psychology is twisted and cruel, and your claims about genetics are false. Perhaps you remember reading about jails in your social studies class? That's where people who train animals with pain end up. Your genes do NOT change because you were subjected to fear and pain. Genes are inherited and can only be altered by abnormal processes.
@kyuubiyura Yeah, I've read plenty about him and his research. Evolutionary theory doesn't work for humans like it does for animals. Whereas an animal is likely to die due to disease or fighting, people can survive brain tumors thanks to modern medicine. Natural selection dictates that someone with a predisposition for cancer should die, but that often isn't the case. Again, your genes do not change because you were subjected to fear and pain.
@zatronium you're missing the point. if someone has cancer, then his genes are different, and his children are more likely to have it. whether they die of it or not has nothing to do with genetics. the conditions of life greatly impact the evolution of any creature, its a known fact. there are many countries where it can be seen more clearly, i can understand that americans wouldnt be able to imagine it. but for example, if an asian has a child, and he grows up in america, he wont have an accent
@kyuubiyura Except having an accent has nothing to do with genetics. The conditions of life impact a creature's genetic structure by allowing the proliferation of beneficial traits, and vice versa. However, most conditions (barring radiation and other pollutants) do not affect the genetic structure directly; this includes both the host creature and its offspring. Perhaps you should learn more about the subject before trying to "educate" someone else?
@zatronium and maybe accents were a bad example, but its a known fact that there are two influences on the development of a creature: the exo- and endo- world. like i said, you cant understand until you've seen the difference of the life in different countries yourself. why do you think there are such big differences? partially genetics, partially a stable and ancient culture that is sustained which influences the behavior of the countires citizens.
@kyuubiyura I apologize if I came off as arrogant, but that was written in response to your assumption of my nationality, and this statement: "...wouldn't be able to imagine it." You've been making claims about genetics that are patiently false, and then you decide to claim that I don't have the intelligence to understand what you're talking about. What sort of response did you expect to receive?
@zatronium again, i didnt say you didnt have the intelligence to imagine, there are things even intelligent people cant fully imagine. accent is influenced by the speech heard by the person during his growth, just as hard life in a country that has suffered through a war can.developingchild.harvard.edu/index.php/resources/reports_and_working_papers/working_papers/wp10/
@kyuubiyura I already told you that it affects a person physically and psychologically, so why are you linking those? Changing the way a person's brain functions is different from changing their genetic structure. The first video clearly states that the brain's structure is built upon the genetic foundation, not vice versa. Also, I agree there are some things we can't yet imagine, but that's because we don't fully grasp the principles that lay the foundation for understanding them.
@kyuubiyura Back at the beginning of this discussion, if you were trying to tell me that a war would affect the populous psychologically, then I'd have to agree wholeheartedly. However, I must dissent and say (again) that the effect would not be an amicable one. War leads to hatred, and hatred leads to war. It takes a long time to break this cycle, but sustaining compassion and rebuffing avarice would eventually win out.
@kyuubiyura Actually, to build upon what you mentioned before, America's leaders provide a great example of what not to do. They preemptively strike countries with infrastructure-crippling attacks, and then leave the country worse off, in spite of supposedly installing democracy. As a result, people dislike Americans, because they elected the leaders who did it. If the tables were turned, nobody would come to their aid because of their prior actions.
@zatronium fine, i admit i might be wrong about offspring gene alteration through life-long experience of the father, ill ask a professional about that. and the idea of Schneizel (although more Nagato's(Pain)) was to bomb everyone. they will all hate him, not each other, they would even feel sorry for one another because they felt similar pain, and fear would ensure that.
@kyuubiyura Without going too much into detail, my understanding of the process is that the genes received by the child are a random selection between the father and mother, excluding any mutations. Though a lifelong experience will allow certain genes to prevail over others, those genes will likely be related to stress response, bodily function, etc., because people poorly equipped to handle such a situation die off first.
@zatronium i think mutations are included. behavior is determined partially by genes, is it not? the idea of Pain was to cause the world equal pain, which would bring understanding of each others feelings, and fear would control those who need more persuasion.
@kyuubiyura Mutations result from various processes, such as radiation, "free radicals," or just a basic failure of the cell to copy the gene correctly when dividing. That's why I said "excluding mutations," because they are random changes, and therefore aren't relevant. You can't cause a mutation that makes people more cooperative without altering the genetic code directly. You can create an environment that prefers such a trait, but pain and fear don't create such an environment.
@kyuubiyura For example, we already use fear and pain to control crime. Retaliation, jail, and maybe even execution are the perils that await wrongdoers. In spite of our attempts to punish criminals, crime still occurs. In fact, many studies have shown that criminals who receive rehabilitation are less likely to become repeat offenders. What makes you think more fear and pain would produce a better result, when we already have proof to the contrary?
@zatronium jail isnt enough pain for some, neither is the fear of it for them. they commit crime because they gain more than they lose in most cases if they already chose their path in life. if retaliation was death for most crimes, then there would be a lot less of them. ideally, equal global pain would mean pain in different forms but in same amounts.sure there are nutcases who enjoy pain or are apathetic, but they are basically sociopaths and should receive mental rehab.or shot if dangerous
@kyuubiyura Then again, there are some people who are impossible to rehabilitate, because our version of punishment is their version of enjoyment. Because we don't fully understand the human mind, it isn't currently possible to fully explain why this occurs. However, consider for a moment Stockholm Syndrome, where the captured begins to have affection for the captor. To your average individual, this is crazy, but it's merely an example of the human mind trying to survive.
@kyuubiyura If someone is tortured enough, it seems logical to conclude that the human mind might start to find torture enjoyable. The same goes for fear, hatred, and any other sort of "negative" human emotion. If a person finds pleasure in such things, who knows what atrocities they might commit to increase their enjoyment? Hence why increasing the fear and pain is not a good thing; it may also increase camaraderie, but will almost certainly promote psychopathic behavior.
@kyuubiyura How do you draw the line between action that creates desired behavior and action that creates insanity? People have different thresholds for mental stability, so something that might make one person crazy could have absolutely no effect on another. Even death for crimes isn't a catch-all solution, because the system governing justice is flawed itself.
@zatronium its actually not that hard to draw that line. yes, different people have different thresholds, but the pain mustn't be at a level that isnt life-destroying, but rather a scar that will remind of it and of what others felt as well
@kyuubiyura For example, this excerpt is an actual law in Texas, USA: "When two railroad trains meet at a crossing, each shall stop and neither shall proceed until the other has passed." That's absolutely ridiculous, yet it's still on the books. (according to legalzoom) If the system is inexact, and the method is inexact, but an exact response is required from both, then clearly fear and pain isn't a viable solution.
@kyuubiyura For example, this excerpt is an actual law in Texas, USA: "When two railroad trains meet at a crossing, each shall stop and neither shall proceed until the other has passed." That's absolutely ridiculous, yet it's still on the books. (according to legalzoom) If the system is inexact, and the method is inexact, but an exact response is required from both, then clearly fear and pain isn't a viable solution.
@kyuubiyura That said, it's just as impossible to expect people to magically start behaving responsibly and charitably. However, there is something that we haven't fully exploited yet: Education. It has been a stabilizing force for centuries; it helped usurp religion's position as a unquestionable entity, provided the means for *many* revolutions, created disparage toward the slave trade, and was an important force in the women's movement.
@zatronium its not magic, its basically a humans own egoism and fear of pain that will help. at least it would work partially, i dont see how lelouches plan changes anything at all. as for education, there is a fine line there too, there is a point where people think "ugh im tired of this, w.e. just want to get out of here". if you think about it, then its fear that keeps them in there, fear of not having a job in the future. for some people its about doing what they love ofc
@kyuubiyura Actually, I'm not arguing in favor or either of their "plans" because both were using war to some extent. Lelouch's plan mirrored the views of an unifying expansionist, while his brother's plan utilized raw oppression. I'm saying that through education, we can dispel some of the worst attributes of our society. For example, if a person recognizes that other humans are fundamentally the same as they are, they wouldn't think of using them as slaves in the first place.
@kyuubiyura Education isn't just about what you learn, but also about how you view things, and how your views impact your opinions. A religious person is apt to cite god as the reason why their house burnt down, while a more educated thinker would realize that faulty wiring in the wall is a more likely culprit.
@kyuubiyura When I said "magically" I meant it as an illustrative adjective, to stress that I don't expect the opposite approach to be amazingly effective either. Some people push for a "Utopia" state, and I know that sort of thing is impossible for the moment. As long as we take little steps toward our goals, they will eventually be realized; though the wait may be long and difficult. Instead, society is slowly heading back to the middle ages, whilst ignorance and greed prevail.
@zatronium im sorry but imo you're completely wrong here. if a person knows that hes having a good life thanks to a slave, for example, he wont care anyway, because, like i said, the core of modern society is ego. the average person wouldnt deny himself of a pleasure, even if he knows that it is at the expense of someone else. it took an entire war to stop slavery, which seems to be an obvious no-no.nowadays its harder to trace, even when roommates take my damn stuff without ever asking
@kyuubiyura If a person knows he can have a better life thanks to technology, why would he pick the slave? I got a little too idealistic for a bit, it's a fault of mine. ;) The point is that advancing society benefits everyone, while greed *appears* to benefit one person. But in reality, by being greedy, they are actually holding society as a whole back. In doing so, they're ironically disadvantaging themselves in the process.
@zatronium i grew up in a country where greed is the driving force of all. i know how their mind works, it starts like "well, if i do it only once, whats the big deal"->"first time didnt hurt, it seems ok, nobody will know"->other people"damn thieves, why can they steal and not me?i want to get stuff as well, its their fault"->country-screwed.everybody knows theyre screwing things up, but they only care about themselves.fear of retribution would control them at least somewhat.
@kyuubiyura We won't ever entirely eliminate greed, but by showing others what they're missing out on, we can channel that negative influence in a positive direction. Many dictators have used education to instill ignorance and control, and indeed religious institutions do the same. I suppose schools could mimic this technique, but aim for compassion and understanding. However, I'd like to think that a properly educated public would eventually come to this realization themselves.
@zatronium as for education, that is under threat as well, the new generation thinks its too cool for school, they are too used to easy life. i have theory, that humanity will not endlessly develop, it will reach a peak, where its laziness and good conditions of life will hold them back from getting smarter. at the same time there will be countries with bad conditions of life, but they wont be able to get a proper education there
@kyuubiyura Well, that's less of a theory and more of a reality. Whether or not we've reached that peak has yet to be seen, but right now the house of cards seems to be crumbling. It's only a matter of time before something happens, and when it does, it's going to be earth shattering. Whether or not that ends up being a literal interpretation also remains to be seen. ;P
@zatronium who knows, maybe a new and better government system will arise from the ashes? doubtful, but i guess theres nothing to lose. theres also another risk with education-the smarter a person is, the more he realizes what he can achieve,and by achieve most people mean money. they become more ambitious, often ready to step on others to get what they want. the problem with education is that in the end, the student decides anyway, usually hes still egoistic.that why i believe its time to force
@kyuubiyura People always get more accomplished when they work as a team. Leaders recognize that, but they also realize that your average individual doesn't want to work together. As a result, we have many organizational layouts that we use to force people to work along side one another. If everybody had a high I.Q., then you're right, they would want to step on others to get what they want. However, they would also realize that they'd get more accomplished if they worked together.
@kyuubiyura The result is that people band together to work on projects without necessitating one of these "control structures," for example, a corporation. This effect is very apparent in the programming community, where coders work together on large open-source projects for little or no ROI. They realize that everyone (including them) benefits from their work, so they don't have a problem doing it for free.
@kyuubiyura As for the governmental issue, I think that once we get the flaws in internet security ironed out, we could leverage the internet as a means reducing corruption. For example (though not a perfect one), a power structure could be created where laws are only written in simple terms (i.e. no legalese) and citizens would have a period of time to vote for or against laws. This takes the power out of the hands of a few, which drastically reduces the influence of a cabal.
@kyuubiyura However, humanity has fallen before from the heights of civilization before. The roman empire's defeat and subsequent "medieval period" that followed could be viewed as a particularly famous failure. We still managed to put ourselves in a precarious position, but we're better off than back then. I'd like to think that we can find it within ourselves to keep moving forward, rather than throwing it into reverse and returning to feudalism, or worse, annihilating ourselves.
@zatronium yeah, chances are that countries will instead think of ways they can improve their own wealth after a global catastrophe.anyway, its been fun, have a good day
@kyuubiyura Fuck, I made a bad typo. That's what I get for failing to proofread. I've enjoyed chatting with you, thanks for providing such an excellent series of counterarguments. Gotta go for now though, later.
@kyuubiyura It's funny you mention Nagato, because that character struggled with the same concept. He was empowered to choose between continuing the cycle of hatred, or possibly breaking it by reversing the damage he'd already caused. Naruto Shippuden doesn't discuss the genetic and socioeconomic ramifications of such a thing, being a shonen anime. However, the author still did a wonderful job of displaying how our beliefs and choices affect us and the people with whom we interact.
@kyuubiyura Emotions, though based in genetics, are not dictated by genetics alone. A person who has endured fear or pain at the hands of another is likely to commit similar acts themselves; this is very apparent in the case of certain types of crime. But we are empowered to make decisions that change our surroundings in more ways than one. So why would a person consciously choose to amplify the animosity that already exists? Why not choose something different - something amicable?
@kyuubiyura I find it amusing that you assume I'm American and that I don't understand simple concepts like evolution. When faced with an opinion that differs from yours, the first reaction should be to evaluate it's worth, rather than dismissively attach denigrations to feeble attempts at disproving their stance. When I first read your post, I thought you might enjoy a discourse on psychology and sociology. Hence why I thought you ignored me; your stubborn response was unexpected.
@kyuubiyura Finally, to wrap up the discussion about accents, an Asian growing up in America *will* have an accent. The reason is because every human that speaks has an accent, but they do not recognize it as an accent due to their familiarity with the linguistic style. If a language is pronounced in more than one way, it has more than one accent. Accents are not distinguished by nationality or race, but most often by locale. Ergo, accents are not caused by genetic changes.
@zatronium im not saying you dont understand evolution, im just saying that you dont understand the impacts on genes by the fear and pain , for example, caused by war. trust me, ive been to many different countries, i saw the differences. and you are wrong about the accents, ive lived with americans who have asian blood, and they had no asian(emphasis) accent at all, but their parents do. i can provide many more examples from personal experience. how do you think people evolved from apes?
@kyuubiyura War has an effect on both a person's psyche and physical health. However, war itself does not directly alter your genetic makeup. What you are seeing is the psychological and physical toll that war takes upon its victims; that sentiment can be passed down through generations. However, just because something has a long lasting effect, does not mean it was caused by a change in genetics. That is the effect of education at work, knowledge passed down through generations.
@kyuubiyura I can appreciate that you refined your claim to better facilitate the actual meaning of an accent. However, that doesn't make me "wrong" about accents. They are not a result of genetic differences, because if they were, we would be stuck with the same accent our entire lives. People are able to change their speech styles at will (though it requires some practice to mimic a different accent), and therefore aren't bound to their accent by genetic code.
This is just epic.... both in the misunderstandings it COULD lead to (for those who have never seen Code Geass) and the fact that lucky SoB gets the achievement I can't get EVER by simply being ordered to live....
I know its not a real achievement, but wouldn't it be awesome if it was.... aside from the whole "genocide" thing.
WTF?
pedreo1977 2 days ago
35 million kills gets Susaku the Urkel Award : "Did I do that?"
MegamanForWii 1 week ago
ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED
35,000,000 KILLS: "All CoD fanboys got pwned"
SrEdu902 2 weeks ago 9
Possible titles for that achievement also include:
Finally Snapped: 35,000,000 pts.
Stopped Being a Wishy-Washy Pansy: 35,000,000 pts.
mobiusdiablo 2 weeks ago
@mobiusdiablo my ideas for the achievement title:
It's ok, no one will miss them: 35,000,000 kills
Hate the creator not the shooter: 35,000,000 kills
Ah fuck now im a major hypocrite: 35,000,000 kills
Holy fuckin balls Nina!? WTF?!: 35,000,000 kills
It's zero's fault I swear! The geass he used on me made me doit!: 35,000,000 kills
and my personal favorite...
Euphy would be proud: 35,000,000 kills
IVISMiLESIVI 1 day ago
@IVISMiLESIVI My personal choice would be:
"Euphy would be proud".:D
Hakkun9872 1 day ago
@Hakkun9872 You love it cuz it's so wrong huh? >:D
IVISMiLESIVI 20 hours ago
DA FUCK IS WITH LONG COMMENT RESPONSES??
eron1965 2 weeks ago 10
if this is Modern Warfare, he must have a ton of nukes by now
Leonknight01 3 weeks ago
Is it wrong that I got about tripple his kill record in two minutes in Armored Core: For Answer? One minute thirty seconds. 100 million kills. No WMDs used.
heliosis01 1 month ago
Kill-tacular...
VECommodore 1 month ago
Press six. Do it. You know you want to... c(=
SixtyNineWoodstock 1 month ago
that was "Suzaku Kamehameha" :))))
MrArty303 1 month ago
Haha. x)
LoveBloodTear 1 month ago
This is awesome in a very horrible way.
snowballstail 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
i get this kill streak at least 5 times a day and sometimes i hear distant explosions and flashes of lights when it happens
revanrecklesscifer 1 month ago
fuckin stupid video
TurkishHegemony 1 month ago
Suzaku,top master gamer h4x0r of the universe!
Gotcha1234Mariok 2 months ago
there were 35 million people in one city???
RyanBrooksby 2 months ago 2
@RyanBrooksby present-day Tokyo metropolitan area has ~36,000,000 people. So, yeah, there were that many people.
Dendarang 1 month ago 2
now that's what i call a kill streak!!!!!!! 35,000,000 KILLS to unlock...... (me playing cod trying to do this)
moonsmoshLOL 2 months ago
WTF! i want an XBox like that!!!
i4BiA 2 months ago
3600 degree spinzaku noscope headshot.
RigearDFO 2 months ago 9
i need this achievement!
how many mw2 tactical nukes equal a FLEJA?
superl82nd 2 months ago
@superl82nd who knows,probably over 9000 XD I just had to put that in.
Kanethedragon 2 months ago
i get this achievement 21 times a day
warhammerdude12 2 months ago
GRATZ SUZAKU-KUN!!!!! oh wait. thats not a good thing is it? oh well who cares.
shisumi1 3 months ago
0:20 -> EPIC FACE =D
Onewingerdraven 3 months ago 2
Because mass murder is a laughing matter lol
Pakshet321432 3 months ago
It's over 35.000.000!
fabyooos 3 months ago
Creepy.
MrHeadgehog 3 months ago
Over 1 million! D:
If only this was an Achievement in Armored Core: for Answer. :(
ManintheArmor 3 months ago
LOL
YaQuadri 3 months ago
1 watch video
2pause
3unpause
4hold 9 continously
5.......
10foni10 4 months ago
35.000.000 kils: genocide. LOL
Gonzalouchikari 4 months ago
i don't think this counts as genocide as those in the blast radius were destroyed indiscriminately
98xana 4 months ago
Ummm.....This may sound..odd....but I have the exact same reaction when I get an achievement like that....
bakugancollecterZ 4 months ago
his K/D is off the charts
guibin 4 months ago
...it's over 9000.
Fynniann 4 months ago
the lol was awesome.
NekoMimiKitty1 4 months ago
SUZAKU KURURUGI: King of Xbox Nation
SHARDK2 4 months ago 3
A Japanese person using an Xbox. RIIIIIIGHT.
ImmaBritannian 4 months ago 3
the title made me laugh so hard and then vid topped it... well done sir, well done *appluads*
blitzhannan 4 months ago
xDDDd COULD NOT STOP LAUGHING!!
potatoyumyum89 4 months ago
I gotta play with him in modern warfare 2. TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING!!!
fenrir1208 4 months ago 3
fucking lol'd
Ainzho 5 months ago
Please add the Achievement Unlocked sound!
sacumblousi 5 months ago
When the screen faded black, I was half expecting a *ba-dink* sound.
ShadowAbomination 5 months ago
well nina invented the fleya,so she gets al suzaku's kill s and schneizel's and nunnally's kills...
Gotcha1234Mariok 5 months ago
You're my hero for making this XD
TrippNessa 5 months ago
I thought the video ended but then the laugh came up so I started dying xD
killerbot64 6 months ago
Everyone's a little guilty here: Suzaku kinda, sorta, not really fired that thing. Lelouch placed the 'live' geass on Suzaku causing him to do this. But there was no way Lelouch could have predicted this. Nina made it, but she did not fire it. Schneizel got it in a position to be shot. The people in Tokyo were there. There's blame for everyone; it's called 'war.'
NxRevived 6 months ago 37
@NxRevived
the introduction (and USE) of nukes pretty much invalided lelouch's entire terrorism insanity by default.
it was already an insanity when Euphie wanted to begin the negotiations/diplomacy tables with the special administration zones which Lelouch accidentally (though not entirely unintentionally) turned into a Slaughter House Bloodbath.
No Mercy, absolute 100% Ruthlessness : Underdogs can't win.
ffalloutgirl 5 months ago
@ffalloutgirl I don't see how that has anything to do with my comment. Nor do I understand what you're trying to say.
NxRevived 5 months ago
@NxRevived
just me agreeing and reinforcing your argument that this is indeed "WAR" and it's hellish.
Suzaku was pragmatic enough to recognize that and joined the Britannian Military.
ffalloutgirl 5 months ago
@ffalloutgirl An argument is not war; it's an argument. Speaking of which, I don't know why we are arguing.
NxRevived 5 months ago
@NxRevived Actually, it's called 'Team Deathmatch' nowadays.
Antifrost 1 month ago 3
@NxRevived Well, Lelouch knew Britannia had WMDs, Suzaku told him earlier. He also could have anticipated a sufficiently devious person who knew about the "live" Geass putting said WMD on the lancelot. Then again, considering how monumentally evil, insane, and most importantly stupid/pointless nuking your own city would be, you can't really blame him for thinking that Schnizel wouldn't really do it, since he didn't know about his "nuke the world, become (a) God, ???, profit" plan.
SteelFyire 4 weeks ago
@SteelFyire its not stupid, Schneizel did have a reason for nuking cities
kyuubiyura 4 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Let me rephrase that then. Scheizel was batshit crazy (but in a subtle way), and decided that killing billions of people to force the world to submit to his rule was a good plan to bring about world peace.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Plus, nuking your own city is stupid in the same way the Death Star, Exterminatus, ect are monumentally stupid plans of action in Space Operas: You loose a massive, massive amount of resources, and are more likely to unite everyone against you than you are to get them to submit to you. Maybe if Lelouch hadn't been suicidally depressed by the time he seized the throne, he would've though of a plan like that, you know, one that didn't involve millions of deaths.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
@SteelFyire but i agree with Schneizel. pain is one feeling that everyone is afraid of, through pain compassion will come, and fear of the Damoclis would keep people in check. it would take a massive force to assault the damoclis, and they wouldnt have the resources for that once the Damoclis would destroy the major cities. im afraid you misunderstood much. Lelouche was never suicidally depressed, it was his plan from the very beginning, the zero requiem. although it doesnt seem too effective
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Damocles would do absolutely nothing to stop guerilla forces, terrorism. All they have to do is blend in with civilian populations, and eventually Schneizel runs out of people to nuke and is forced to throw in the towel. Or alternatively someone assassinates him (always a possibility for even the most paranoid leaders), and everything goes to hell as the world fights over control of the battlestation.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
@SteelFyire terrorism? against whom? killing people you're trying to save?that makes no sense. there would be no terrorism, and they wouldnt be able to harm Damocles anyway.assassination isnt very probable, nobody was able to assassinate any of the other princes, only Lelouche who had geass. and after Schneizels rule is over, he could just finish up with Lelouche's plan and destroy the center of world hate-the Damocles. that would ensure at least a longer-lasting peace than Lelouches
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I do agree that Lelouch's plan was even worse than Schneizel's, considering that his dear sister will probably be dead by the time the decades out when the UFN and ex-area colonies gang up on Britannia and burn it to the ground. (which is what would happen in a scenario like that in real life) But Schneizel's plan was pretty bad. It falls apart as soon as he steps off the Damocles (can you say attempted assassinations?) or dies of natural causes.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
@SteelFyire And honestly, at least Lelouch left behind a somewhat functional international governing body and united the world against Britannia. The destruction of one nation is preferable to the clusterfuck that would follow Schneizel's death.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
@SteelFyire Lelouches plan doesnt change anything, and the world united against Germany, but things arent peaceful now. after Schneizels rule would end, the scar of fear and pain would remain in the genes for at least about 3 generations, and that mass fear and pain is what would unite the world, and who knows, maybe in those 3 generations a better system would be created, led by compassion, instead of the everyone-for-himself system we have now
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura The problem with ruling by fear is that it creates hatred, not compassion. Hatred for the people abusing their power (and someone *will* abuse it), hatred for the ones who help enforce that group's rule, and finally, hatred for anyone who even tries to associate with either of the former in any manner. The same topic was discussed in Naruto, Bleach, Claymore, and many other prominent Anime. No matter how scared you make a body of people, they *will* find ways to fight you.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura The deterioration of our current political/economic system is to be expected, given the greed and ignorance that permeates our social structure. In spite of this, the world is relatively "at peace" compared to, say, World War II. We still have genocides, we still have civil unrest, and we still have massive political corruption. But we've managed to avoid nuclear annihilation, and people are slowly realizing that greed doesn't benefit anyone - not even the rich.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura The next few decades will be a true test of humanity's mettle; even moreso than many of the other pivotal moments in history. The result of the forthcoming struggle will be slow and painful, but just maybe we can forge a system better than capitalism or communism. You might wonder why I placed those two side by side. It's because for all their differences, they are effectively the same - a plan on paper that only serves to obfuscate the greed of the rulers governing said system.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Finally, why am I focusing so much on greed? Because, in spite of Schneizel's high intelligence, his greed caused him to overlook the most obvious flaw in his master plan. His method of ruling the world would cause people to hate him; as such, was doomed to failure regardless of whether or not he eliminated every opposing faction. They would organize against him again, because that's what people do. They get tired of tyranny, and rise up, to try and make tomorrow a better day.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium like i said, Schneizels plan is better than Lelouches, and if he ends it by using lelouches plan and destroying the center of world hate after decades of pain and hate towards it, then people will be already somewhat used to helping each other under fear and then will help each other to unite against the damoclis. and people will always be greedy, when they get the chance to earn some money by stepping on someone else, most people would take, because the core of society is egoism.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I was honestly hoping you wouldn't ignore everything I wrote to continue arguing, but I suppose that was expecting too much. TL;DR version: They will unite against the source of hatred, but only until it's gone. Afterward they would refocus their anger and resentment on eachother. Hatred breeds hatred, and pain breeds pain.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium i didnt ignore what you said, you either ignored me or misunderstood.i stated this several times already: by the end of Schneizels rule, which would most likely easily withstand any terrorist attack, the genes of the next generations will be different- people will think more about one another, being previously stimulated by fear. perhaps you remember in biology class, you were probably taught that animals can be trained by creating reflexes based on pain? same principle.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura If anyone is misunderstanding here, it's not me. Your perception of human psychology is twisted and cruel, and your claims about genetics are false. Perhaps you remember reading about jails in your social studies class? That's where people who train animals with pain end up. Your genes do NOT change because you were subjected to fear and pain. Genes are inherited and can only be altered by abnormal processes.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium ...ever heard of Darwin?
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Yeah, I've read plenty about him and his research. Evolutionary theory doesn't work for humans like it does for animals. Whereas an animal is likely to die due to disease or fighting, people can survive brain tumors thanks to modern medicine. Natural selection dictates that someone with a predisposition for cancer should die, but that often isn't the case. Again, your genes do not change because you were subjected to fear and pain.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium you're missing the point. if someone has cancer, then his genes are different, and his children are more likely to have it. whether they die of it or not has nothing to do with genetics. the conditions of life greatly impact the evolution of any creature, its a known fact. there are many countries where it can be seen more clearly, i can understand that americans wouldnt be able to imagine it. but for example, if an asian has a child, and he grows up in america, he wont have an accent
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Except having an accent has nothing to do with genetics. The conditions of life impact a creature's genetic structure by allowing the proliferation of beneficial traits, and vice versa. However, most conditions (barring radiation and other pollutants) do not affect the genetic structure directly; this includes both the host creature and its offspring. Perhaps you should learn more about the subject before trying to "educate" someone else?
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium and maybe accents were a bad example, but its a known fact that there are two influences on the development of a creature: the exo- and endo- world. like i said, you cant understand until you've seen the difference of the life in different countries yourself. why do you think there are such big differences? partially genetics, partially a stable and ancient culture that is sustained which influences the behavior of the countires citizens.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@zatronium and one more thing, stop being so arrogant, im not trying to educate anyone, im having a conversation.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I apologize if I came off as arrogant, but that was written in response to your assumption of my nationality, and this statement: "...wouldn't be able to imagine it." You've been making claims about genetics that are patiently false, and then you decide to claim that I don't have the intelligence to understand what you're talking about. What sort of response did you expect to receive?
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium again, i didnt say you didnt have the intelligence to imagine, there are things even intelligent people cant fully imagine. accent is influenced by the speech heard by the person during his growth, just as hard life in a country that has suffered through a war can.developingchild.harvard.edu/index.php/resources/reports_and_working_papers/working_papers/wp10/
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I already told you that it affects a person physically and psychologically, so why are you linking those? Changing the way a person's brain functions is different from changing their genetic structure. The first video clearly states that the brain's structure is built upon the genetic foundation, not vice versa. Also, I agree there are some things we can't yet imagine, but that's because we don't fully grasp the principles that lay the foundation for understanding them.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Back at the beginning of this discussion, if you were trying to tell me that a war would affect the populous psychologically, then I'd have to agree wholeheartedly. However, I must dissent and say (again) that the effect would not be an amicable one. War leads to hatred, and hatred leads to war. It takes a long time to break this cycle, but sustaining compassion and rebuffing avarice would eventually win out.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Actually, to build upon what you mentioned before, America's leaders provide a great example of what not to do. They preemptively strike countries with infrastructure-crippling attacks, and then leave the country worse off, in spite of supposedly installing democracy. As a result, people dislike Americans, because they elected the leaders who did it. If the tables were turned, nobody would come to their aid because of their prior actions.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium fine, i admit i might be wrong about offspring gene alteration through life-long experience of the father, ill ask a professional about that. and the idea of Schneizel (although more Nagato's(Pain)) was to bomb everyone. they will all hate him, not each other, they would even feel sorry for one another because they felt similar pain, and fear would ensure that.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Without going too much into detail, my understanding of the process is that the genes received by the child are a random selection between the father and mother, excluding any mutations. Though a lifelong experience will allow certain genes to prevail over others, those genes will likely be related to stress response, bodily function, etc., because people poorly equipped to handle such a situation die off first.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium i think mutations are included. behavior is determined partially by genes, is it not? the idea of Pain was to cause the world equal pain, which would bring understanding of each others feelings, and fear would control those who need more persuasion.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Mutations result from various processes, such as radiation, "free radicals," or just a basic failure of the cell to copy the gene correctly when dividing. That's why I said "excluding mutations," because they are random changes, and therefore aren't relevant. You can't cause a mutation that makes people more cooperative without altering the genetic code directly. You can create an environment that prefers such a trait, but pain and fear don't create such an environment.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura For example, we already use fear and pain to control crime. Retaliation, jail, and maybe even execution are the perils that await wrongdoers. In spite of our attempts to punish criminals, crime still occurs. In fact, many studies have shown that criminals who receive rehabilitation are less likely to become repeat offenders. What makes you think more fear and pain would produce a better result, when we already have proof to the contrary?
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium jail isnt enough pain for some, neither is the fear of it for them. they commit crime because they gain more than they lose in most cases if they already chose their path in life. if retaliation was death for most crimes, then there would be a lot less of them. ideally, equal global pain would mean pain in different forms but in same amounts.sure there are nutcases who enjoy pain or are apathetic, but they are basically sociopaths and should receive mental rehab.or shot if dangerous
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Then again, there are some people who are impossible to rehabilitate, because our version of punishment is their version of enjoyment. Because we don't fully understand the human mind, it isn't currently possible to fully explain why this occurs. However, consider for a moment Stockholm Syndrome, where the captured begins to have affection for the captor. To your average individual, this is crazy, but it's merely an example of the human mind trying to survive.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura If someone is tortured enough, it seems logical to conclude that the human mind might start to find torture enjoyable. The same goes for fear, hatred, and any other sort of "negative" human emotion. If a person finds pleasure in such things, who knows what atrocities they might commit to increase their enjoyment? Hence why increasing the fear and pain is not a good thing; it may also increase camaraderie, but will almost certainly promote psychopathic behavior.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium well pain and fear to the point of madness isnt the idea, the idea is an amount that would stimulate behavior
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura How do you draw the line between action that creates desired behavior and action that creates insanity? People have different thresholds for mental stability, so something that might make one person crazy could have absolutely no effect on another. Even death for crimes isn't a catch-all solution, because the system governing justice is flawed itself.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium its actually not that hard to draw that line. yes, different people have different thresholds, but the pain mustn't be at a level that isnt life-destroying, but rather a scar that will remind of it and of what others felt as well
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura For example, this excerpt is an actual law in Texas, USA: "When two railroad trains meet at a crossing, each shall stop and neither shall proceed until the other has passed." That's absolutely ridiculous, yet it's still on the books. (according to legalzoom) If the system is inexact, and the method is inexact, but an exact response is required from both, then clearly fear and pain isn't a viable solution.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kyuubiyura For example, this excerpt is an actual law in Texas, USA: "When two railroad trains meet at a crossing, each shall stop and neither shall proceed until the other has passed." That's absolutely ridiculous, yet it's still on the books. (according to legalzoom) If the system is inexact, and the method is inexact, but an exact response is required from both, then clearly fear and pain isn't a viable solution.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura That said, it's just as impossible to expect people to magically start behaving responsibly and charitably. However, there is something that we haven't fully exploited yet: Education. It has been a stabilizing force for centuries; it helped usurp religion's position as a unquestionable entity, provided the means for *many* revolutions, created disparage toward the slave trade, and was an important force in the women's movement.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium its not magic, its basically a humans own egoism and fear of pain that will help. at least it would work partially, i dont see how lelouches plan changes anything at all. as for education, there is a fine line there too, there is a point where people think "ugh im tired of this, w.e. just want to get out of here". if you think about it, then its fear that keeps them in there, fear of not having a job in the future. for some people its about doing what they love ofc
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Actually, I'm not arguing in favor or either of their "plans" because both were using war to some extent. Lelouch's plan mirrored the views of an unifying expansionist, while his brother's plan utilized raw oppression. I'm saying that through education, we can dispel some of the worst attributes of our society. For example, if a person recognizes that other humans are fundamentally the same as they are, they wouldn't think of using them as slaves in the first place.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Education isn't just about what you learn, but also about how you view things, and how your views impact your opinions. A religious person is apt to cite god as the reason why their house burnt down, while a more educated thinker would realize that faulty wiring in the wall is a more likely culprit.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura When I said "magically" I meant it as an illustrative adjective, to stress that I don't expect the opposite approach to be amazingly effective either. Some people push for a "Utopia" state, and I know that sort of thing is impossible for the moment. As long as we take little steps toward our goals, they will eventually be realized; though the wait may be long and difficult. Instead, society is slowly heading back to the middle ages, whilst ignorance and greed prevail.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium im sorry but imo you're completely wrong here. if a person knows that hes having a good life thanks to a slave, for example, he wont care anyway, because, like i said, the core of modern society is ego. the average person wouldnt deny himself of a pleasure, even if he knows that it is at the expense of someone else. it took an entire war to stop slavery, which seems to be an obvious no-no.nowadays its harder to trace, even when roommates take my damn stuff without ever asking
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura If a person knows he can have a better life thanks to technology, why would he pick the slave? I got a little too idealistic for a bit, it's a fault of mine. ;) The point is that advancing society benefits everyone, while greed *appears* to benefit one person. But in reality, by being greedy, they are actually holding society as a whole back. In doing so, they're ironically disadvantaging themselves in the process.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium i grew up in a country where greed is the driving force of all. i know how their mind works, it starts like "well, if i do it only once, whats the big deal"->"first time didnt hurt, it seems ok, nobody will know"->other people"damn thieves, why can they steal and not me?i want to get stuff as well, its their fault"->country-screwed.everybody knows theyre screwing things up, but they only care about themselves.fear of retribution would control them at least somewhat.
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura We won't ever entirely eliminate greed, but by showing others what they're missing out on, we can channel that negative influence in a positive direction. Many dictators have used education to instill ignorance and control, and indeed religious institutions do the same. I suppose schools could mimic this technique, but aim for compassion and understanding. However, I'd like to think that a properly educated public would eventually come to this realization themselves.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium as for education, that is under threat as well, the new generation thinks its too cool for school, they are too used to easy life. i have theory, that humanity will not endlessly develop, it will reach a peak, where its laziness and good conditions of life will hold them back from getting smarter. at the same time there will be countries with bad conditions of life, but they wont be able to get a proper education there
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Well, that's less of a theory and more of a reality. Whether or not we've reached that peak has yet to be seen, but right now the house of cards seems to be crumbling. It's only a matter of time before something happens, and when it does, it's going to be earth shattering. Whether or not that ends up being a literal interpretation also remains to be seen. ;P
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium who knows, maybe a new and better government system will arise from the ashes? doubtful, but i guess theres nothing to lose. theres also another risk with education-the smarter a person is, the more he realizes what he can achieve,and by achieve most people mean money. they become more ambitious, often ready to step on others to get what they want. the problem with education is that in the end, the student decides anyway, usually hes still egoistic.that why i believe its time to force
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura People always get more accomplished when they work as a team. Leaders recognize that, but they also realize that your average individual doesn't want to work together. As a result, we have many organizational layouts that we use to force people to work along side one another. If everybody had a high I.Q., then you're right, they would want to step on others to get what they want. However, they would also realize that they'd get more accomplished if they worked together.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura The result is that people band together to work on projects without necessitating one of these "control structures," for example, a corporation. This effect is very apparent in the programming community, where coders work together on large open-source projects for little or no ROI. They realize that everyone (including them) benefits from their work, so they don't have a problem doing it for free.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura As for the governmental issue, I think that once we get the flaws in internet security ironed out, we could leverage the internet as a means reducing corruption. For example (though not a perfect one), a power structure could be created where laws are only written in simple terms (i.e. no legalese) and citizens would have a period of time to vote for or against laws. This takes the power out of the hands of a few, which drastically reduces the influence of a cabal.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura However, humanity has fallen before from the heights of civilization before. The roman empire's defeat and subsequent "medieval period" that followed could be viewed as a particularly famous failure. We still managed to put ourselves in a precarious position, but we're better off than back then. I'd like to think that we can find it within ourselves to keep moving forward, rather than throwing it into reverse and returning to feudalism, or worse, annihilating ourselves.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium yeah, chances are that countries will instead think of ways they can improve their own wealth after a global catastrophe.anyway, its been fun, have a good day
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Fuck, I made a bad typo. That's what I get for failing to proofread. I've enjoyed chatting with you, thanks for providing such an excellent series of counterarguments. Gotta go for now though, later.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura It's funny you mention Nagato, because that character struggled with the same concept. He was empowered to choose between continuing the cycle of hatred, or possibly breaking it by reversing the damage he'd already caused. Naruto Shippuden doesn't discuss the genetic and socioeconomic ramifications of such a thing, being a shonen anime. However, the author still did a wonderful job of displaying how our beliefs and choices affect us and the people with whom we interact.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Emotions, though based in genetics, are not dictated by genetics alone. A person who has endured fear or pain at the hands of another is likely to commit similar acts themselves; this is very apparent in the case of certain types of crime. But we are empowered to make decisions that change our surroundings in more ways than one. So why would a person consciously choose to amplify the animosity that already exists? Why not choose something different - something amicable?
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I find it amusing that you assume I'm American and that I don't understand simple concepts like evolution. When faced with an opinion that differs from yours, the first reaction should be to evaluate it's worth, rather than dismissively attach denigrations to feeble attempts at disproving their stance. When I first read your post, I thought you might enjoy a discourse on psychology and sociology. Hence why I thought you ignored me; your stubborn response was unexpected.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Finally, to wrap up the discussion about accents, an Asian growing up in America *will* have an accent. The reason is because every human that speaks has an accent, but they do not recognize it as an accent due to their familiarity with the linguistic style. If a language is pronounced in more than one way, it has more than one accent. Accents are not distinguished by nationality or race, but most often by locale. Ergo, accents are not caused by genetic changes.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@zatronium im not saying you dont understand evolution, im just saying that you dont understand the impacts on genes by the fear and pain , for example, caused by war. trust me, ive been to many different countries, i saw the differences. and you are wrong about the accents, ive lived with americans who have asian blood, and they had no asian(emphasis) accent at all, but their parents do. i can provide many more examples from personal experience. how do you think people evolved from apes?
kyuubiyura 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura War has an effect on both a person's psyche and physical health. However, war itself does not directly alter your genetic makeup. What you are seeing is the psychological and physical toll that war takes upon its victims; that sentiment can be passed down through generations. However, just because something has a long lasting effect, does not mean it was caused by a change in genetics. That is the effect of education at work, knowledge passed down through generations.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura I can appreciate that you refined your claim to better facilitate the actual meaning of an accent. However, that doesn't make me "wrong" about accents. They are not a result of genetic differences, because if they were, we would be stuck with the same accent our entire lives. People are able to change their speech styles at will (though it requires some practice to mimic a different accent), and therefore aren't bound to their accent by genetic code.
zatronium 3 weeks ago
@kyuubiyura Plus, nuclear deterrence only lasts until other people get ICBMs, then you've got MAD, which is never something a sane person wants.
SteelFyire 3 weeks ago
The editing of the laugh at 0:31 is so cheesy it's actually funny
Slickdown 6 months ago
MUST....GET...ACHIEVEMENT....
YumiTumiKurumi 6 months ago
M-M-M-MULTIKILL!
StardustDeath 8 months ago
@Hakkun9872 Where are the 1400000 nukes AFTER the first one?
Bonus Points if you get it
booman014 8 months ago
BEST PART!!! 0:31
Castlevania08 9 months ago
Suzaku > Hitler
brc2thelimit 10 months ago 66
0:27
ProudWildGreenBeast 10 months ago
shoulda made it a little longer
Lordsteven125 11 months ago
:0
TheViewerXD 1 year ago
Suzaku beats Hitler.
LinkDarklinkOnilink 1 year ago
@LinkDarklinkOnilink Edit : 9 players that counted in his kills. (the 9 dislikes)
LinkDarklinkOnilink 1 year ago
@LinkDarklinkOnilink make that 11
Lordsteven125 11 months ago
Comment removed
Lordsteven125 11 months ago
@LinkDarklinkOnilink yea he made hitler look like a chump
Lordsteven125 11 months ago
Great Vid!
What was the music used?
EveryoneCry 1 year ago
I added it to the description.
Hakkun9872 1 year ago
@Hakkun9872 thank you!
EveryoneCry 1 year ago
lol
youkilledkiller22 1 year ago
KILLIONAIRE! x3,500,000!!!
acarlsonGH 1 year ago 6
Didn'y he kill 25 million? Not 35 million?
9maria91 1 year ago
@9maria91 it was 35 million
valtenvalanos 1 year ago
It's epic..i wish code geass is in xbox 360!!! i would play it!!!!!!
LadyXDevil 1 year ago
all i can say:
... killing frenzy?
gino14 1 year ago
This is just epic.... both in the misunderstandings it COULD lead to (for those who have never seen Code Geass) and the fact that lucky SoB gets the achievement I can't get EVER by simply being ordered to live....
I know its not a real achievement, but wouldn't it be awesome if it was.... aside from the whole "genocide" thing.
TheRevanindoril 1 year ago 2
@Hakkun9872 how was that Suzaku's fault?
multipurpose101 1 year ago
I'd laugh like a madman too if I got an achievment like that.
darkspire91 1 year ago
that was an achievement alright laugh now hahahha
mrxai658 1 year ago
when Suzaku laughs..he looks like he's in pain
Remnainsofbattle 1 year ago
Lulz,soulcalibur at the end,Nice vid man
Remnainsofbattle 1 year ago
makes you wonder if he's happy that he got the achievement or sad that he got it
Destroyahweapon 1 year ago
Lelouch lost his highscore :(
gohpenghng 1 year ago 7
.... this was on my birthday also epic
War817 1 year ago
more like hitliers greatests xbox achiviment
pigcow4 1 year ago 8
@pigcow4 Hitler's can't, he got banned. Look up "Hitler gets banned from Xbox Live " on youtube. It's true.
Zhakaron 1 year ago 4
Oh lol the laugh part was epic.
dropthepin 2 years ago 123
lmao
ninetailedlulu 2 years ago 11