Added: 3 years ago
From: BBCWorldwide
Views: 37,443
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (191)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • bulshiht

  • o yeah

  • first thing that came into my mind....ITS A FUCKIN PEINIS

  • that's my viagra they fookin took eeettt :'<

  • its a penis

  • crums.

  • Well, if the Flood of Noah is true then there could definitely be life out of our ATMOSPHERE, still raining down on earth.... :PP

  • David Blaine Put it there on Mars.

  • Just what I want to hear. Life on Mars info, from a guy in his T-Shirt and Boxers. GTFOH

  • No worries, whatever happens Chuck Norris will come to our rescue...i'm sure of it

  • ALH84001 has been disredited, it's not evidence of martian life.

  • scientist dont know shit

  • @TheCorybradley Yes, I agree with you, the earth is flat as your religious people said.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics Isaiah 40:22. The Bible doesn't say the Earth is flat. Ignorant Arrogant fool.

    Read before you judge.

  • @sailentshadow Isaiah 11:12 "...four corners of the earth". Matthew 4:8 "...very high mountain [...] showed all kingdoms of the earth", to see all kingdoms of the earth the earth must be flat.

    Oh and, ignorant religious fool, I never said that the bible suggest that the earth is flat until now, I said" your religious people said", i.e. the church.

    Read before you judge yourself.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics RE#1: Seeing as how most ALL scientists were all Christians where we got most of our sciences from (don't argue this, you'd be wrong.); the earth doesn't teach the world is flat.

    Four corners of the earth is speaking the same thing about "God Stretches out the heavens like a curtain/scroll" obviously we know the universe / world isn't flat, and there are 3Dimensions. He was describing the world as if being viewed on a MAP. Think about it. Ever been on a submarine?Same concept

  • @sailentshadow Let's not forget those great religious scientists lived in the dark age where cars/planes/atoms/3+ floor buildings/bacterias/atoms/comp­uters/TVs/radio waves/lamps/internet and the universe was a lie, unlike today where most of the scientists reject god and live in the technology age.

    Who said he was describing the world on the map instead of you? did he wrote ".. four corners of the earth ON A MAP"? no.

    The planets are not flat, however the universe is.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics The universe isn't flat. that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

    all that stuff was a "lie"? Uh.. WHAT? O_O

    are you high or something?

  • @sailentshadow You didn't understand what I mean by 'flat' of course it is not 'flat' as you think, we are not on a paper, when I say flat I mean it is not curved or anything, it is perfectly 'flat'. Only such a universe can begin out of nothing, watch "A universe out of nothing by Lawrence Kraus".

  • @iPlayWithPhysics Still doesn't mean we're flat. ROFLMFAO. And by no means can you argue it. IF the "big bang is true" and nothing became nothing that nothing exploded and turned into everything, then dirt to water and water into dirt and then CARBON and all turned into dinosaurs and herbs; It would be CIRCULAR from one pov or a huge 'Ball'... dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life, right there....

  • @sailentshadow Hmm no, it does mean our universe is flat. You cannot have nothing, have you heard about quantum vacuum? which basically says: "If you have nothing, you will always get something." just because you think it is dumb it doesn't mean it is false.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics Dude..... flat is 2 dimensional you nitwit. We are 3 dimensional.

    I rest my case. The universe is not flat.

    --and I can smash the theory of 'quantum vacuum' with Biblical verses. Though I can't make an "equation" I can give a theory that is worth reckoning, and no, I won't tell you, because you are a swine.

  • @sailentshadow facepalm, flat means not curved or anything, it is perfectly flat, if it wouldn't be flat you could look far enough and see the back of your head, you misunderstand the term 'flat universe' just google it.

    Sure good luck debating Stephen Hawking with your bible.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics ""if it wouldn't be flat you could look far enough and see the back of your head""

    ROFLMFAO This is what they're teaching kids now-a-days?!

  • @sailentshadow Tell that to Stephen Hawking.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics So.. the fact that the world is round, we can see far enough to see the back of our heads?

    I mean... the earth isn't flat... So why can't I see far enough to see the back of my head?

    This idea of a flat universe is an epic of retardation.

  • @sailentshadow Flat universe isn't idea and yea if it would be an idea it would be nonsense but it's not an idea, it's a fact.

    fact = something observable.

  • @iPlayWithPhysics RE #2: Matthew 4:8 you're reading in english, and secondly, they are talking about that part of the world. Again, The translation is feeble. The Word of God is PURE.

    "World" used here is also used in Isaiah 40:22, "the circle of the world/Earth" -Also describing it as 'systems' like government, the universe, the world etc.

    the word all: "individually:: each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things, everything;

    collectively;some of all types" understand? You're........

  • @iPlayWithPhysics RE #3: You're assuming and wanting to see things how YOU see it. Not how God had originally it written down.

    As finite CREATURES, not the Creator; it's obvious people can make dumb assumptions-They think IS right. When it's not.

    -the def. were taken from their Greek origins.

    --Also, Ever heard of "Ravenna, Italy"? Go look at the Mosaics on the ceiling of "Chiesa di San Vitale". You'll see an obvious picture of what Isaiah is speaking about.

    any more 'flat earth' Scriptures?LOL

  • scientist dont know shit

  • They are just caterpillars that Chuck Norris tossed onto Mars.

  • @2yearoldrustycokecan HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • the only reason they're excited because they dont want to be the only planet alone in the solar system, and if there is life on another planet like us we will try to make peace and stuff and more new items because of them and stuff.

  • Maybe Past life originated on mars and venus but it maybe hit by an asteroid that extinct its life like dinosaurs

  • It's a Martian's fossil dick..

  • Looks like a couple of Dildo's to me

  • When I've first herd about this I knew it was bullshit - next hoax attempting to proove the evolution, just like Java men.

  • @polonophobia

    Are you trying to deny evolution?

    If so look up "peppered Moths" on google,

    and try to dismiss that proof of evolution

  • @tom133991

    I watched - and what I've seen was natural selection not an evolution.

  • @polonophobia

    Wow,

    You do realize Natural Selection is the process of adaptive Evolution right?

    (adaptive Evolution simply being a fancier name for Evolution)

    And that is all evolution is,

    The progression of one species of animal due to survival of those most adaptable to their surroundings...

  • @tom133991

    The difference between natural selection and evolution is that the first has been proven - we can observe it in action - and as such is a part of science and the second is part of a believe system - has never been observed. The most common argument for the evolution is: If you don't believe it you are stupid.

  • @polonophobia No listen. Natural selection IS Evolution It is the process of Evolution! Look it up, I have a degree in biology. I think that I know much more on evolution than you. Specially when you can't grasp that natural selection is evolution. Just google "is natural selection evolution" if you don't believe me You have done no research into the matter and you are talking out of your ass. Go get an education and then come back.
  • @polonophobia

    Evolution is certain,

    The only thing scientists debate in evolution anymore are the tendencies of how it works.

  • @tom133991

    "Evolution is certain" - Really ? Have anyone proven it while I was asleep ?

    Can you please provide a link to a scientific experiment in which it was proven ?

    Did scientists find a single example of positive mutation (absolutely necessary for evolution but never observed ) ? EVOLUTION is a religious believe it had never been proven and I seriously doubt it can be in the feature.

  • @polonophobia

    You have no argument.

    Evolution and Natural selection IS THE SAME THING.

    Natural selection leaves only the strongest animals alive,

    This leads to only the better genes that are more likely to keep the animal alive to be passed on to its children.

    That is evolution in a nut shell.

    Also the simple factor that you seem to mix words up ( its Belief and Future not Believe and feature)

    show that you obviously have a sub par intelligence.

    Do some research next time.

  • @tom133991

    My intelligence is fine - I have my Masters Degree - how about you ?

    Did it occur to you that English might not be my first language ?

    Do you always use an insult to win an argument ?

    Please don't waist my time giving me this rubbish on what is what in a nutshell - give me one simple example of an experiment that proves the evolution and is repeatable.

    1.Example of a positive mutation

    2. Link to an experiment which proves that live emerges spontaneously from rocks and minerals.

  • @polonophobia

    Excuse me,

    That was not bait to win this argument,

    It is just getting tedious as I have explained and given you factual proof.

    you could even just Google "the fossil record"

    And yes I have a degree in biology.

    So you are arguing on my subject of my expertise then just making up things when you go along is going to be caught out.

    ALSO

    EVOLUTION DOES NOT STATE HOW LIFE BEGAN!

    Evolution is a theory to explain the diversity of life not the beginnings

  • @polonophobia

    If you want to talk about how life began the scientific consensus is currently on Abiogenesis.

    by your own argument you have stated that evolution is true,

    I think your actual argument is against Abiogenesis

  • @polonophobia um.. yes... to.. every single one of those... moron, it is scientific fact

  • they need to dig deeper on mars than just a few feet

  • the guy at 2:28 to 2:44 is the only person that isnt a dumbass in this video

  • i want dinosuor bones on mars . Shit this donsent make siht

  • has anyone ever thought that maybe an astroid knocked a peice of earth on to mars? instead of vise versa

  • @maslabud-Yes I was thinking the same too about this...agree.

  • I support the south park idea. Earth is in fact a universal reality show where species from all different planets are put together on the same planet :D

    Nah, just kidding, but it's a cool idea:P

  • with all of the funding they receive. where have all of the facts gone? into their vacation homes and lifestyle?

  • The crucial recent discovery of water on Mars increases the possibility that some form of bacterial life did exist at some time on the planet. Where there's water there is life its the main ingrediant for it.

    Life may have started on Mars then, but something happened that stopped it from developing any further like what it would do on earth billions of years ago.

  • If the sun was 10% colder 3 biljon years ago then maybe life orginated on Venus and it got hit by a astroid then this life might came to Mars and evolved maybe 1 bijon years then Mars got hit and this evolved venus-mars-life came to Earth and mixed with earth-life, so now we have fungus-plants and animals

  • @Qulopuaa maybe us humans were the evolved life ^^. i mean, we are more evolved than the animals and fungus-plants. im just saying.

  • @Qulopuaa fungi, plants and animals share a lot of the same dna cause we got common ancestry.

  • @Qulopuaa interesting theory, but there is an extremely small chance for that to happen

  • @Qulopuaa that doesnt need to be always an astroid to cause an extinction :)

  • i think it is very bold statement to say that life started on mars.

  • If life came to this earth via asteroids billions of years ago then why can't the same happen to Mars? The only difference is life didn't develop on the red planet, as it did on earth, because Mars didn't form a protective layer of ozone, which would of protected it from dangerous gamma radiation from the sun.

  • i think we should leave it to david bowie to decide.

  • leave it to the scientific experts to fuck up as usual

  • there's always an explenation for everything. and you wonder why we're in the position we're in today.  You're a fool to think we're the only sentients in existance.

  • that rock was on earth got knocked to mars then got knocked to earth. my story is just as plausible as there story.

  • it was on mars and got knocked to earth. And that's the end of the story.

  • you can never prove that,

  • in fact, i can, i just found the url that proves my statement right, and yours wrong.

  • i found one that said the worm part was artifically created in the lab durring the treatment for the x ray microscope, ha ha tghere not even there at all

  • it was a rock

  • "Protoplasm is the basis of all living matter, and 'the vital power of protoplasm seems to depend on the constant presence of water' (Lowsons' Text-book of Botany, Indian Edition. London 1922, p. 23). Text books of Zoology are also clear on the point. For example, see T.J. Parker and W.A. Haswell, Textbook of Zoology, London, 1910, Vol I. p. 15: 'Living protoplasm always contains a large amount of water.' " [2]

  • "And God has created every animal from water: of them there are some that creep on their bellies; some that walk on two legs; and some that walk on four. God creates what He wills for verily God has power over all things. (The Noble Quran, 24:45)"

  • what about the bug? ''thy fly has thy six legs, and thou must slap it''

  • For goodness sake stop preaching where not at Sunday school or the mosc come to that, you know. What is this got to do about possibility of microbial life on Mars being found? You religious nutturs have lost the plot somewhere

  • "About 72 percent of the surface of our Globe is still covered with water, and it has been estimated that if the inequalities of the surface were all leveled, the whole surface would be under water, as the mean elevation of land sphere-level would be 7,000-10,000 feet below the surface of the ocean (cf. 11:7). This shows the predominance of water on our Globe. That all life began in the water is also a conclusion to which our latest knowledge in biological science points.

  • Apart from the fact that protoplasm, the original basis of living matter, is liquid or semi-liquid and in a state of constant flux and instability, there is the fact that land animals, like the higher vertebrates, including man, show, in their embryological history, organs like those of fishes, indicating the watery origin of their original habitat. The constitution of protoplasm is about 80 to 85 percent water (see also 24:30-31 and 24:45)." [3]

  • Mars actually had water on it at one point in its life. It still does actually, it has ice!

  • mastainventa dude its a proven fact that life cannot start or exist without water but don't take my word for it, go do some research before starting your own brilliant ideas

  • it is not proven at all not in the slightest. life on earth may not be able to but thats earth. life on earth has water and life has evolved to depend on water here. to prove it you would have to study every planet in the universe. they think it cant they dont know it cant at all.

  • they said life could not exist without some kind of energy from the sun but that has been blown out of the water as in caves that are miles and miles deep they have discovered life and it lives without the sun it lives on acid. the acid is so strong it would burn your flesh and kill you if you was to breath it in.

  • no, they say it couldnt ORIGINATE withoutthe sun.... life migrated/evolved into those caves/acid

  • but I do agree with your other theory of organisims not needing water to survive because in the early stages of earth, there was no oxygen and there were many bacteria/plants who survived, so hey who knows

  • lol did u hit your head on a rock mastainventa...lol dont be crazy

  • Life on my Mars?

    It's more likely than you think. Run a free martian check now!

  • another thing is who ever said life canot be without water and the air we breath? why cant other life live on other gases just cos we breath air doesnt mean onother organism cant breath methane gas. we have evolved to drink water and breath air why did other organisms do the same? life on other planets could have evolved to breath anything and drink anything. water to life on another planet could be like other gases to us deadly and so could the air we breath. god humans are so stupid sometimes

  • Humans are stupid? Lol, what planet are you from, then? j/k XD

    All lame joking aside, that's a pretty good theory you have there. o_o

  • Well put!

    Me and my friends spent the entire evening last night arguing about whether or not aliens could be real (cool, I know) and one of their arguments against their existence was "No other planet has the elements needed for life."

    By logic they'd have a completely different anatomy to us - thank you for bringing some sense to the internet!!

  • one more thing is some life could be so advanced that they may be able to totally hide an entire planet so as not to be seen. if there is life near us who says they want us to know they are there? look at the way we treat each other let alone them. they may have been watching us for thousands of years maybe even watched us evolve. they could even have put life here to start with to see how they evolved. sounds far fetched but possible. they could be so advanced it is beyond our minds

  • you got some pretty good ideas. keep thinking. Thats the real power of the universe.

  • BBC ROCKS!

  • This was posted 2008. i wonder what they know about it know...buy the way is it impossible to send a robot? with a camera like they do on the moon. will it smelt? or just freeze?

  • They have a robot on mars

  • no dip, sherlock.

  • there probly was life on mars,but im not saying its still there today its just another page of history not something present to write down

  • HORSE HOCKEY

  • mars used to be the old earth

  • Perhaps. Humans want to know much more. What happened to it. Do we repear history, if has been like ours earth.

  • HAHAHAHAAAAA xD

  • The US airforce have remains of alien beings from Roswell crash site. Those fucks dont want the public to know . Who gives a shit about worms on Mars when they know the fucken truth is out there.

  • Why are they obsessing about Mars? There's nothing interesting there, but there's billions of solar systems and earth like planets around other stars. Fortunately humans are too stupid for space travel so those planets are safe.

  • Im with you. We did launch a telescope to look for Earth like planets, but even if we find one how would we get there? I guess im hitchhiking with some aliens lol

  • Dude! How does a person even get a job at NASA? It seems awesome. Judge whether planets are even planets, look around for aliens, crash satellites. Shit, I dunno. Seems like fun.

  • You in 5th grad right? Of course an earth animal will die Mars is NOT the same as earth, not the same atmosphere, not the same temperature,i could go on and on.

  • A Mars animal would be epic.

    but yeah you're right.

  • I just meant, if there are more galaxies then humans, and more planets then galaxies, there are a lot of planets

  • well think of this, there are billions of galaxies, inside each is billions of solar systems, and some solar systems could have 100's of planets.

    thats alot more

  • there are more planets than grains of sand on the earth thats a lot . life does exist in space were the prof and so say we are the only life here on earth is a lot stupid. small minds cant grasp it its not if its where

  • most interesting part of this is the scanning technology... love that stuff-- i'm taking university chemistry classes right now for the joy of it, and i can't waitto get to the level to be able to "play" with technology like that

  • BS and speculation.

  • it would be funny if that was a dick

  • n.a.s.a- never a straight answer.

  • if we do find life, or evidence of life from the past, wot will it be called? because NOTHING on Earth is specifically called an Earthling..? so why call anything on Mars a Martian? NASA give us the truth!

  • the truth is we are the decedents of martians... maybe

  • you might be, but i can promise you im 100% out of my mums twat, ask her, shes quite open about and and calls me her "son"

  • or martians are decendents of us

  • i so believe in life on Mars! it had to be life there, otherwise were would the chinese came from?

  • looooooool!

  • The funny part is...we as a species, and life as we know it on earth was all brought here from Mars by our Ancestors prior to the planets complete demise.

    Strange I know, but only time will prove this theory.

  • uv watched a certain film too many times lol nah oj i dont belive in god n i came up wiv sumat like that too her abowt aliens n that but she said , "well who created them then?" i tell ya, ya mams always right

  • I got family in mars!!!

  • @tiratesin

    I have life in Uranus!

  • @Woodpipemaker they have an ointment for that now.

  • good news

  • Unfortunately we need proof beyond doubt... We're so close...

  • the sun revolves around the earth?! wad a discovery... lame. the EARTH revolves around the sun. DUH.

  • I think we are in our "the earth is flat" phase as far as mars goes. In 100 years people will look back at us and say , dam they didn't even know there was life on mars at one time? Just like we look back and wonder how people could have believed the earth was flat , and the scrutiny people faced for saying it was not flat but round.

    Click my name to see my UFO video.

  • Omoshiroi

  • hmm.. interesting.

  • The two significant quotes are, "...Martian microfossil," and, "They are the remains of Martian Life." Both are edited clips, so we don't know the context...which means we don't know if McKay claimed these things as fact or theory.

  • THE SUN REVOLVES AROUND THE EARTH

  • hahahahaaahahahahaha ha.

    ...

  • there's more planets and galaxies out there in the universe than every grain of sand,rice,pebble on our Earth combined so there's definitely life out there, probably more intelligent too. Sadly, this is one of the things that mankind will take a long time to accomplish because of stupid human minds like the bush administration that think we are alone in the universe, i mean if it weren't for them NASA would be sending people to the moon right now.

  • well said. religious right has its hold on people.

  • I don't think there's more planets than humans. but again, i could be WRONG.

  • wow....... you are definatley wrong

  • As i said " I could be WRONG " meaning that i could be terrible wrong. it means that i am not sure. but i guess you're right.

  • there are more galaxies then humans.

  • I never said there wasn't.

  • that is why you cant take everything right then and there you have to see the error there. to me mars is not and never was a life sustaining planet but i could be wrong

  • I believe we are not the only life in the universe,

  • no way we are alone in the universe. jesus christ there are suns out there that make our own sun look like a pebble in the dirt!

  • I heard an astro-physicists say: 'The odds of finding life on another planet are... astronomical'. lol - Interesting choice of words. IMHO It's only a matter of time.

  • looks like dogshit

  • ....as you type to someone half way around the world while watching videos about scientists trying to make further advances. Yes, it's the scientists who are the chumps.

  • shut up fuckhead

  • ok, that was unclear. Rephrase plz

  • Hehehe, God, you make me giggle.

  • if it wasnt for scientists, we would have modern medicine, lights in our house, have a basic idea how dinosaurs looked like, travel into space...i think we as a people need to appreciate science more and not label scientists as cooky people making up wild claims.

    narrow minded people act like they have all the answers when they owe their comfort in life and knowledge to those who were the most open minded.

  • Yes, scientists have made important advances. MY POINT is that this ignorant fuck made an outlandish claim based on little to no evidence.

  • but it was based on evidence...that was disproved after further testing resulting in new, better evidence. science is suppose to work that way.

  • You don't get it. I'm not disputing the usefulness of science or scientists or scientific method.

    Listen: THIS PARTICULAR SCIENTIST JUMPED THE GUN BECAUSE HE WANTED TO BE FAMOUS. HE IS AN IDIOT.

  • i dont know if the scientist jumped the gun or not purely to become famous...but i was thinking he had to announce his discovery to the rest of the scientific community for them to to agree with him, or disprove him.

  • i can't remember exactly what he said, and i can't be bothered to watch the video again, but if he presented his findings to the scientific community and said "this is a martian fossil" then that would be utterly unscientific, and SplendidDissenter is right. he should have said "we have found something that looks like it might be a fossilised form of martian life", and then gone on to conduct tests with results that would be reviewed by a board of peers before presenting anything

    to anyone.

  • u would think that wouldent u so y did he do it did he want to get famouse and go back on his word as a scientist or did he actually find life but his findings are getting depressed into false findings what i learned is humans cant be trusted its hard to now whats goin on in someones mind he could be right or roung bout what about the other guy he could be roung also so ..........

  • Finding "real" fossilized micro organisms on Mars or a few miles under the surface would be nice and a truly spectacular discovery, but let's not jump to conclusions with just one piece of questionable at best kind of evidence.

  • it could be a new bacteria that could introduce a new type of desease :O

    ...or not!

  • it doesn't even look like a worm

  • neither do you