You don't understand because your brain is one-dimensional. Something obviously went wrong during your early developmental stage.
Your stupidity is depressing, so I've decided to stop typing to what is essentially a brick wall. I truly feel grateful now, realizing how good I have it. You're creepy... artificial.
Do you have any evidence to support any of your blather? It's all pretty stupid and I have to admit to you that it's put me in quite a conundrum when I try to decide which of your utterances is the stupidest. The fact that you refuse to help me with that - not even a friendly suggestion - indicates that you insist on being close-minded.
Hey, does being close-minded give you comfort and help you sleep at night? Just a friendly question.
That's another stupid thing you've said. It's a common thing said by 9/11 tards when they haven't done their homework and are too lazy to to present anything meaningful. Just like you.
Poetryhound's Information: IP address: 141.156.171.99 Hostname: Verizon Internet Services Language: English Location: Washington, DC, USA Oper. System: Windows XP Web browser: Firefox 2.0 Resolution:1024x768 Javascript:Enabled No Proxy DNS specific and FW/UDP info upon Gmail (samename) request.
Let me give you a taste of your own venom Poetryhound,The unswerving asumption that the government/and military are completely innocent of the mass murder of 3000 americans on 911 is akin to a cult member blindly following the cult leader swallowing every lie and digesting all their statements as truth. 'HAVE ANOTHER SIP OF KOOL-AID" poetryhound. You will find you the one in a cult and we are the smart ones questioning "the truth"
At least thats what you want people to believe. 5 Bucks says somebody on the commission eventually becomes President. If you fix the system maybe even Daly will, but I doubt it. The american people are just to stupid to realise and except the fact that they are being murdered , have been murdered and will be murdered by thier own goverment and a select few power brokers ie. Carlyle Group , Haliburton and the major banks. You are todays German empire and should be ashamed.
Nah, even if there is a video of the crash, and that's a big "if," you guys will say the shadow is wrong or the wing is too blurry or something. 9-11 Conspiracy Theory is a religion, not a serious line of inquiry.
To buy these stupid conspiracies, you have to believe that the Bush Administration is smart and capable enough to organize and carry out and cover up the most complex plot in world history and at the same time so dumb that they couldn't plant some WMD in Iraq or get anything right in the subsequent invasion. So much for the plot to control the world.
"To buy these stupid conspiracies, you have to believe that the Bush Administration is smart and capable enough to organize and carry out and cover up the most complex plot in world"
Right... because thousands of people talking about it and digging up evidence means they were successful, right?
Still haven't seen any evidence from you conspiracy kooks. All you guys have are unsubstantiated assertions, misinterpretations, and uninformed speculation. What's the evidence? Not assertions. Not suspicions. Not questions. Evidence.
You're sidetracked by the wacky theories because it upsets you that people could actually be so stupid. I agree. Get over it.
Shit happens. Wars, famine, disease. Rich people infiltrate governments, buy each other out, and blackmail each other. There are dozens of proven examples of corruption identical to those in practice today. Business is war, and war is big business.
Stop looking at the physical acts, and focus on the paper trails, relationships, and history of all the key players.
It's the same old story... governments are made up of people, and people lie, cheat, and steal.
Look at who was involved with influencing what, and what they gained from 9/11 and the ensuing war. People influence events to suit their needs. It's always been that way. How hard is that to accept?
Open up a history book. This is nothing new; It's how the world was built.
It's obvious that you haven't done any research at all. Ex government officials have come forward, and there are actual court cases if you cared to look. Don't expect the media to tell you...
Judging from your favourites, you're just on a temporary conspiracy theorist hating trip. It will pass as soon as something else distracts you, and you'll replace your generic, misinformed channel description with something else.
Have fun picking on bigfoot and watching dumpling videos... lol. Idiot.
What's obvious is that you are STILL unable to present any evidence to back up your kookspiracy claims. There was no "inside job," and no government officials from within any inside job have come forward.
Then present it. Not baseless assertions. Not speculation. Not questions. Evidence.
Saying "people have come forward" suggest they were part of the alleged "inside job." No, not one single person from inside the "inside job" has come forward.
No, kookspiracists didn't expose Watergate. Reporters from the Washington Post & New York Times did. You probably think they're part of the 9/11 conspiraracy. Kookspiracists like you are alongside moon landing deniers.
You're delusional. Ever heard of deepthroat? You know- the informant?
Where do you think the press got their information from? Watergate was a series of conspiracies on all levels, and the people who exposed them are conspiracy theorists... LITERALLY. This includes the media.
You're discrediting yourself over and over, here. A reporter who suspects a conspiracy IS a conspiracy theorist... same as a doctor, plumber, or anyone else.
You're very naive an uninformed. Looks like you rely solely on Joe Blow's kookspiracy web site for your "information" on 9/11.
Deepthroat was FBI. Do you think the FBI is credible about 9/11? Don't try to associate yourself and your fellow kooks with the non-retarded people who uncovered Watergate. You fit more in the category of people who believe in creationism or who believe the moon landings were fake. You're simply an uneducated clown who STILL is unable to present any conspiracy evidence.
LOL... you still haven't opened that dictionary, have you?
A murder scene: on the floor, a knife. EVIDENCE. Proof, no... but evidence, yes.
You need me to provide evidence for you? It would take me a lifetime to go over all of the physical stuff before we could even get to the circumstantial evidence.
You're only discrediting yourself, angry little troll. This is tiring... it's like talking to a 5 year old.
Claiming there's evidence is not the same thing as presenting the evidence, which you have failed to do. You're a failure. That's why I'm laughing at you.
"Claiming there's evidence is not the same thing as presenting the evidence, which you have failed to do."
Get off your lazy ass and find it for yourself. Only an idiot can't find simple evidence. Until you stop confusing evidence with proof, you'll never get anywhere.
Like I said- you're stuck in the past. There have been many developments, as well as people within the government and large industry that have indeed made accusations of an inside job.
Do some research! All of this is EVIDENCE... that thing you're STILL confusing with proof.
I've looked. No evidence of any "inside job." I've even checked the various Joe Blow kookspiracy web sites and watched kookspiracy videos. But instead of evidence, all that's presented are unsubstantiated assertions, willful misinterpretations, and uninformed speculation. No evidence.
You're wrong. If you would instead use the word "proof" I'd agree with you 100%, but you insist on using incorrect terminology.
There is no such thing as "no evidence". Let me educate you:
Evidence is just circumstantial and/or physical fragments of a story... a story that is open to interpretation. Even the absence of material is evidence; A missing weapon or object can indicate the clean-up of a crime scene.
This is very basic stuff, here... educate yourself!
LOL! You're drowning, here. Just admit it, because I'm absolutely right, and you know it!
Evidence is abstract, and open to interpretation. That's why BOTH prosecutors and defense attorneys can in fact use the SAME piece of evidence to make opposite points! One man's trash is another man's treasure.
EVERYTHING is evidence. THIS IS COMMON SENSE. You're... just... wrong... that is a fact.
So it turns out that you are unable to present any evidence of any "inside job." First you said it would take years (Haha!!!) but it turns out you have nothing to present at all, not even a second's worth. Admit it, you're a failure.
There's an empty white room, with a dead man on the floor, naked. There isn't a speck of blood anywhere, and not a mark on his body... what does that tell you?
He wasn't shot- I found evidence of that... through LACK of a gunshot wound. He wasn't stabbed, or hit by a bus, or beaten with a bat either...
There is no such thing as no evidence. You can ALWAYS come to absolute, concrete conclusions based on nothing- LITERALLY.
This is incredibly simple stuff! Why can't you grasp it?
Everything is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. It's also evidence that it wasn't an inside job. This is the only point I've been trying to make- evidence and proof are not the same.
Evidence is unbiased, innocent, untainted hints at an unlimited amount of possible explanations. It's up to people to interpret the most logical explanations- positive and negative- and form conclusions.
Neither the government nor "truthers" have PROVEN anything. This is all I'm saying!
"Everything is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job."
Meaningless. You failed again.
Play your linguistic game, but it simply underscores that fact that you are unable to present any evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. And that's fine with me.
It's called using your language correctly. You are wrong, and not at an opinionated level, but a factual one. You are LITERALLY wrong, because you are using incorrect words. You have redefined the word "evidence" and abused it at your own expense.
I have pointed out your misuse of words, nothing more. Your inability to admit your own faults is your downfall. I suppose I shouldn't expect you to understand... we just aren't on the same level. You are closed-minded.
Wow, you sure must love failure because you have consistently failed to present any evidence of an inside job. Instead, you've made idiotic claims like, "There no such thing as no evidence." Can you really be that stupid? The evidence surely shows that to be the case. You're a failure and a clown.
In other words, you are unable to present any evidence of a 911 inside job. Thanks for confirming that you've come up empty-handed.
BTW, since you refused to help be decide your stupidest line, I've decided on my own that your that there's no such thing as "no evidence" is your stupidest. I wish you would have helped me though. It would have been evidence of teamwork!
Lol, everything I said was perfetly logical and correct.
There literally is no such thing as "no evidence". "No evidence" of a meteorite hitting my house is also evidence- that a meteorite never hit my house.
I'll say it again: What I am saying here is basic common sense, and is in every investigative textbook. This is sqaure 1, as basic as you can possibly get... yet you don't seem to get it. That much is EVIDENT.
You are making assumptions and attacking arguments I never even made.
It's funny to watch you tripping all over yourself trying to make a point that has no relevancy to 9/11 and whether there's any evidence of an inside job. Since you're consistently flummoxed when it comes to presenting evidence, I have to assume you haven't read any of the investigative reports or independent analyses and are too lazy to do so.
I already told you what the evidence was! Many conclusions have been made from it. From the start, I have been doing one thing: trying to make you understand what evidence is. That's it!
Why do you think I'm only defending the conspiracy theorists? I'm defending common sense. Both sides have evidence but neither has proof. Until one does, both should be taken seriously. It's called not being narrow-minded. How can you not see that?
I attack stupidity and lies on both sides. You're biased.
You really can't connect any dots at all? You can't think of an circumstantial evidence? There are several massive conflicts of interest that made all-too-familiar rich people even richer. This is fact.
You completely believe what the government says? Wow... I'm smart enough to know that both sides have their share of truths and inaccuracies. You need to use your own judgement. If you 100% agree with either side, you're not doing that. I'm not surprised to see you're from Washington. Robot...
Do you have any evidence that there's no such thing as no evidence?
When I go into a courtroom where a guy is accused of a crime and his defense attorney says there's no evidence he was in the vicinity of the crime, I'm going to shout out that there's no such thing as no evidence. And as they haul me away, I'm going to scream that what I said is perfectly logical and correct.
I'm trying to decide which is the more stupid thing you've said so far. It's either your claim that there's no such thing as "no evidence," or it's your claim that accusations are evidence. Help me decide. Which one do you think is more stupid?
Once again you have failed to present any evidence of any "inside job," let alone proof. You're simply an uneducated clown dancing around to hide the fact that you don't know anything about 9/11 or the investigations. Failure.
Thanks for proving just how shallow and uneducated you really are...
Give me a hypothetical example of a suspected murder with no evidence. Go on- give an example. I'll take your "no evidence" and come to some important conclusions.
Translation: You've STILL presented no evidence of any inside job. Why would you believe in something if there's no evidence to support it? That's called religion, or in your case, a cult. Welcome to the N37BU6 kookspiracy cult!
Quite simple to pull off really, all they had to do was have explosives planted in the base of the towers, and on 9/11 they pretended like 4 planes were being hijacked when really they just rerouted them to Pennsylvania, then flew two military jets into the World Trade Center filled with more explosives and shot down all the witnesses on Flight 93 with an F-15 after blowing up the Pentagon with a cruise missile. It was only the world's most intricate and flawlessly executed plan ever
"Quite simple?" I don't think so. Quite complex, expensive, and involved hundreds of conspirators. The only thing lacking in your theory is evidence. But at least your unsubstantiated assertions are charming and whimsical.
And last, the multiple camera views at the pentagon (tapes?). The "plane" that hit the pentagon, hit the newly built side of the pentagon, coninsidence of donald rumsfeld on the complete other side of the pentagon. The unexplained failure of the air defence at the pentagon, the gas station evidence tooken and never released, even after 4 years.
I was in on the plot, and you figured it out. Gee, all that planning with F-15s and remote-controlled 757s and hiding all the passengers and faking all their calls to their families and secretly planting thousands of pounds of explosives when the twin tower security & maintenance staffs & office workers were looking the other way and inventing all that Al Qaeda stuff & planting witnesses, all of it for nothing because we forgot about the gas station video camera. Drat!
Copy and paste this message as a response to PoetryHound:
PoetryHound-Just wanted to keep you busy looking at this post.
If you looking here than you can't be over there on another post. I am going to organize your opposition to join me in this strategy of keeping you busy by wasting your time. Eventualy you will become frustrated. Have fun chasing your sanity. If you are sick of PoetryHound copy this comment and past it as a reply to PoetryHound. Lets spam him into the Nut House.
So Senator Mark Dayton's criticisms are legitimate and credible? Good! Because he also thinks the planned demolition theory is bunk. Glad you think he's credible.
LOL, no I'm not from Washington. Almost everything that guy listed was wrong. I don't even use Windows XP although I suppose it was a logical guess.
Hey, do you think that guy's post was evidence or no evidence that I'm from Washington? I say it was both evidence AND no evidence.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
There's literally no such thing as evidence.
There's only no evidence.
Because nothing can truly be considered evidence.
But everything can be considered to be no evidence of something.
It's really very basic.
I verify that what I'm saying is true.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
You don't understand because your brain is one-dimensional. Something obviously went wrong during your early developmental stage.
Your stupidity is depressing, so I've decided to stop typing to what is essentially a brick wall. I truly feel grateful now, realizing how good I have it. You're creepy... artificial.
Bye, now.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Do you have any evidence to support any of your blather? It's all pretty stupid and I have to admit to you that it's put me in quite a conundrum when I try to decide which of your utterances is the stupidest. The fact that you refuse to help me with that - not even a friendly suggestion - indicates that you insist on being close-minded.
Hey, does being close-minded give you comfort and help you sleep at night? Just a friendly question.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"find it for yourself."
That's another stupid thing you've said. It's a common thing said by 9/11 tards when they haven't done their homework and are too lazy to to present anything meaningful. Just like you.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
NWOpenyoureyes 3 years ago
Let me give you a taste of your own venom Poetryhound,The unswerving asumption that the government/and military are completely innocent of the mass murder of 3000 americans on 911 is akin to a cult member blindly following the cult leader swallowing every lie and digesting all their statements as truth. 'HAVE ANOTHER SIP OF KOOL-AID" poetryhound. You will find you the one in a cult and we are the smart ones questioning "the truth"
realistromeo 5 years ago
At least thats what you want people to believe. 5 Bucks says somebody on the commission eventually becomes President. If you fix the system maybe even Daly will, but I doubt it. The american people are just to stupid to realise and except the fact that they are being murdered , have been murdered and will be murdered by thier own goverment and a select few power brokers ie. Carlyle Group , Haliburton and the major banks. You are todays German empire and should be ashamed.
Canukfan 5 years ago
Nah, even if there is a video of the crash, and that's a big "if," you guys will say the shadow is wrong or the wing is too blurry or something. 9-11 Conspiracy Theory is a religion, not a serious line of inquiry.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
To buy these stupid conspiracies, you have to believe that the Bush Administration is smart and capable enough to organize and carry out and cover up the most complex plot in world history and at the same time so dumb that they couldn't plant some WMD in Iraq or get anything right in the subsequent invasion. So much for the plot to control the world.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
conspiracys wont stop until they get that footage
cc40TX 5 years ago
"To buy these stupid conspiracies, you have to believe that the Bush Administration is smart and capable enough to organize and carry out and cover up the most complex plot in world"
Right... because thousands of people talking about it and digging up evidence means they were successful, right?
Keep contradicting yourself...
N37BU6 3 years ago
"digging up evidence"
Still haven't seen any evidence from you conspiracy kooks. All you guys have are unsubstantiated assertions, misinterpretations, and uninformed speculation. What's the evidence? Not assertions. Not suspicions. Not questions. Evidence.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"unsubstantiated assertions"
You just summed up the government's explanation.
You're sidetracked by the wacky theories because it upsets you that people could actually be so stupid. I agree. Get over it.
Shit happens. Wars, famine, disease. Rich people infiltrate governments, buy each other out, and blackmail each other. There are dozens of proven examples of corruption identical to those in practice today. Business is war, and war is big business.
It's called reality.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Stop looking at the physical acts, and focus on the paper trails, relationships, and history of all the key players.
It's the same old story... governments are made up of people, and people lie, cheat, and steal.
Look at who was involved with influencing what, and what they gained from 9/11 and the ensuing war. People influence events to suit their needs. It's always been that way. How hard is that to accept?
Open up a history book. This is nothing new; It's how the world was built.
N37BU6 3 years ago
And STILL no evidence presented. Just mindless gobblidigook and vague nothingness. Same old kookspiracy nonsense.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
It's obvious that you haven't done any research at all. Ex government officials have come forward, and there are actual court cases if you cared to look. Don't expect the media to tell you...
Judging from your favourites, you're just on a temporary conspiracy theorist hating trip. It will pass as soon as something else distracts you, and you'll replace your generic, misinformed channel description with something else.
Have fun picking on bigfoot and watching dumpling videos... lol. Idiot.
N37BU6 3 years ago
What's obvious is that you are STILL unable to present any evidence to back up your kookspiracy claims. There was no "inside job," and no government officials from within any inside job have come forward.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
There is PLENTY of evidence! What are you talking about?
Open up a dictionary. Look up the word "evidence", then the word "proof". You are confusing the two in a very naive way.
Now I know you haven't bothered to look, because YES, people have come forward to expose various conspiracies that tie into this theory.
PS- "kookspiracists" exposed watergate, and just about every other proven coverup in history. Sheeple like you depend on people with awareness.
N37BU6 3 years ago
"There is PLENTY of evidence!"
Then present it. Not baseless assertions. Not speculation. Not questions. Evidence.
Saying "people have come forward" suggest they were part of the alleged "inside job." No, not one single person from inside the "inside job" has come forward.
No, kookspiracists didn't expose Watergate. Reporters from the Washington Post & New York Times did. You probably think they're part of the 9/11 conspiraracy. Kookspiracists like you are alongside moon landing deniers.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
You're delusional. Ever heard of deepthroat? You know- the informant?
Where do you think the press got their information from? Watergate was a series of conspiracies on all levels, and the people who exposed them are conspiracy theorists... LITERALLY. This includes the media.
You're discrediting yourself over and over, here. A reporter who suspects a conspiracy IS a conspiracy theorist... same as a doctor, plumber, or anyone else.
You are very juvenile. It's almost cute...
N37BU6 3 years ago
You're very naive an uninformed. Looks like you rely solely on Joe Blow's kookspiracy web site for your "information" on 9/11.
Deepthroat was FBI. Do you think the FBI is credible about 9/11? Don't try to associate yourself and your fellow kooks with the non-retarded people who uncovered Watergate. You fit more in the category of people who believe in creationism or who believe the moon landings were fake. You're simply an uneducated clown who STILL is unable to present any conspiracy evidence.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
LOL... you still haven't opened that dictionary, have you?
A murder scene: on the floor, a knife. EVIDENCE. Proof, no... but evidence, yes.
You need me to provide evidence for you? It would take me a lifetime to go over all of the physical stuff before we could even get to the circumstantial evidence.
You're only discrediting yourself, angry little troll. This is tiring... it's like talking to a 5 year old.
N37BU6 3 years ago
"There is PLENTY of evidence!"
Claiming there's evidence is not the same thing as presenting the evidence, which you have failed to do. You're a failure. That's why I'm laughing at you.
I'm angry? Hardly. Try amused.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"Claiming there's evidence is not the same thing as presenting the evidence, which you have failed to do."
Get off your lazy ass and find it for yourself. Only an idiot can't find simple evidence. Until you stop confusing evidence with proof, you'll never get anywhere.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Translation: You've got no evidence of any "inside job" conspiracy. You're a failure.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Lol...
Like I said- you're stuck in the past. There have been many developments, as well as people within the government and large industry that have indeed made accusations of an inside job.
Do some research! All of this is EVIDENCE... that thing you're STILL confusing with proof.
N37BU6 3 years ago
"find it for yourself."
I've looked. No evidence of any "inside job." I've even checked the various Joe Blow kookspiracy web sites and watched kookspiracy videos. But instead of evidence, all that's presented are unsubstantiated assertions, willful misinterpretations, and uninformed speculation. No evidence.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
You're wrong. If you would instead use the word "proof" I'd agree with you 100%, but you insist on using incorrect terminology.
There is no such thing as "no evidence". Let me educate you:
Evidence is just circumstantial and/or physical fragments of a story... a story that is open to interpretation. Even the absence of material is evidence; A missing weapon or object can indicate the clean-up of a crime scene.
This is very basic stuff, here... educate yourself!
N37BU6 3 years ago
"All of this is EVIDENCE"
Uh, no. Accusations are not evidence. You're the one who needs a dictionary.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
LOL! You're drowning, here. Just admit it, because I'm absolutely right, and you know it!
Evidence is abstract, and open to interpretation. That's why BOTH prosecutors and defense attorneys can in fact use the SAME piece of evidence to make opposite points! One man's trash is another man's treasure.
EVERYTHING is evidence. THIS IS COMMON SENSE. You're... just... wrong... that is a fact.
N37BU6 3 years ago
"I'm absolutely right"
Yeah, as verified by...YOU! What a surprise.
So it turns out that you are unable to present any evidence of any "inside job." First you said it would take years (Haha!!!) but it turns out you have nothing to present at all, not even a second's worth. Admit it, you're a failure.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
There's an empty white room, with a dead man on the floor, naked. There isn't a speck of blood anywhere, and not a mark on his body... what does that tell you?
He wasn't shot- I found evidence of that... through LACK of a gunshot wound. He wasn't stabbed, or hit by a bus, or beaten with a bat either...
There is no such thing as no evidence. You can ALWAYS come to absolute, concrete conclusions based on nothing- LITERALLY.
This is incredibly simple stuff! Why can't you grasp it?
N37BU6 3 years ago
Okay, what's the evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job?"
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Everything is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. It's also evidence that it wasn't an inside job. This is the only point I've been trying to make- evidence and proof are not the same.
Evidence is unbiased, innocent, untainted hints at an unlimited amount of possible explanations. It's up to people to interpret the most logical explanations- positive and negative- and form conclusions.
Neither the government nor "truthers" have PROVEN anything. This is all I'm saying!
N37BU6 3 years ago
"Everything is evidence that 9/11 was an inside job."
Meaningless. You failed again.
Play your linguistic game, but it simply underscores that fact that you are unable to present any evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. And that's fine with me.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Lol... "linguistic game"
It's called using your language correctly. You are wrong, and not at an opinionated level, but a factual one. You are LITERALLY wrong, because you are using incorrect words. You have redefined the word "evidence" and abused it at your own expense.
I have pointed out your misuse of words, nothing more. Your inability to admit your own faults is your downfall. I suppose I shouldn't expect you to understand... we just aren't on the same level. You are closed-minded.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Wow, you sure must love failure because you have consistently failed to present any evidence of an inside job. Instead, you've made idiotic claims like, "There no such thing as no evidence." Can you really be that stupid? The evidence surely shows that to be the case. You're a failure and a clown.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Unless you rewrite the dictionary, you are wrong.
"Evidence: A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment."
It's that simple. You are incredibly stupid.
N37BU6 3 years ago
In other words, you are unable to present any evidence of a 911 inside job. Thanks for confirming that you've come up empty-handed.
BTW, since you refused to help be decide your stupidest line, I've decided on my own that your that there's no such thing as "no evidence" is your stupidest. I wish you would have helped me though. It would have been evidence of teamwork!
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Hey, guess what, cult buddy? I've decided you're wrong. It's true because I say so.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Lol... you're just precious.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Thanks. But I'm sad that you didn't want to help me choose your stupidest line. You could at least tell me if you think I picked the right one.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Lol, everything I said was perfetly logical and correct.
There literally is no such thing as "no evidence". "No evidence" of a meteorite hitting my house is also evidence- that a meteorite never hit my house.
I'll say it again: What I am saying here is basic common sense, and is in every investigative textbook. This is sqaure 1, as basic as you can possibly get... yet you don't seem to get it. That much is EVIDENT.
You are making assumptions and attacking arguments I never even made.
N37BU6 3 years ago
It's funny to watch you tripping all over yourself trying to make a point that has no relevancy to 9/11 and whether there's any evidence of an inside job. Since you're consistently flummoxed when it comes to presenting evidence, I have to assume you haven't read any of the investigative reports or independent analyses and are too lazy to do so.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"everything I said was perfetly logical and correct."
LOL. Solipsist.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
I already told you what the evidence was! Many conclusions have been made from it. From the start, I have been doing one thing: trying to make you understand what evidence is. That's it!
Why do you think I'm only defending the conspiracy theorists? I'm defending common sense. Both sides have evidence but neither has proof. Until one does, both should be taken seriously. It's called not being narrow-minded. How can you not see that?
I attack stupidity and lies on both sides. You're biased.
N37BU6 3 years ago
"I already told you what the evidence was!"
Oh! is it too late to nominate another stupid thing you've said? Because I want to add that one to the list.
See, there's no evidence that you already told me what the evidence was, and there's also no evidence that you DIDN'T tell me what the evidence was.
And hey, guess what? What I have said is correct. I hereby verify that what I said was correct. I agree with myself.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
You really can't connect any dots at all? You can't think of an circumstantial evidence? There are several massive conflicts of interest that made all-too-familiar rich people even richer. This is fact.
You completely believe what the government says? Wow... I'm smart enough to know that both sides have their share of truths and inaccuracies. You need to use your own judgement. If you 100% agree with either side, you're not doing that. I'm not surprised to see you're from Washington. Robot...
N37BU6 3 years ago
Do you have any evidence that there's no such thing as no evidence?
When I go into a courtroom where a guy is accused of a crime and his defense attorney says there's no evidence he was in the vicinity of the crime, I'm going to shout out that there's no such thing as no evidence. And as they haul me away, I'm going to scream that what I said is perfectly logical and correct.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
I'm trying to decide which is the more stupid thing you've said so far. It's either your claim that there's no such thing as "no evidence," or it's your claim that accusations are evidence. Help me decide. Which one do you think is more stupid?
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Once again you have failed to present any evidence of any "inside job," let alone proof. You're simply an uneducated clown dancing around to hide the fact that you don't know anything about 9/11 or the investigations. Failure.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"There is no such thing as "no evidence"."
Wow, can you possibly be that stupid?
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Thanks for proving just how shallow and uneducated you really are...
Give me a hypothetical example of a suspected murder with no evidence. Go on- give an example. I'll take your "no evidence" and come to some important conclusions.
N37BU6 3 years ago
Translation: You've STILL presented no evidence of any inside job. Why would you believe in something if there's no evidence to support it? That's called religion, or in your case, a cult. Welcome to the N37BU6 kookspiracy cult!
PoetryHound 3 years ago
"There is PLENTY of evidence!"
Then why are so flummoxed when asked to present it? C'mon, what's the evidence? Not baseless assertions. Not speculation. Not questions. Evidence.
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Quite simple to pull off really, all they had to do was have explosives planted in the base of the towers, and on 9/11 they pretended like 4 planes were being hijacked when really they just rerouted them to Pennsylvania, then flew two military jets into the World Trade Center filled with more explosives and shot down all the witnesses on Flight 93 with an F-15 after blowing up the Pentagon with a cruise missile. It was only the world's most intricate and flawlessly executed plan ever
cc40TX 5 years ago
"Quite simple?" I don't think so. Quite complex, expensive, and involved hundreds of conspirators. The only thing lacking in your theory is evidence. But at least your unsubstantiated assertions are charming and whimsical.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
And last, the multiple camera views at the pentagon (tapes?). The "plane" that hit the pentagon, hit the newly built side of the pentagon, coninsidence of donald rumsfeld on the complete other side of the pentagon. The unexplained failure of the air defence at the pentagon, the gas station evidence tooken and never released, even after 4 years.
cc40TX 5 years ago
I was in on the plot, and you figured it out. Gee, all that planning with F-15s and remote-controlled 757s and hiding all the passengers and faking all their calls to their families and secretly planting thousands of pounds of explosives when the twin tower security & maintenance staffs & office workers were looking the other way and inventing all that Al Qaeda stuff & planting witnesses, all of it for nothing because we forgot about the gas station video camera. Drat!
PoetryHound 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Copy and paste this message as a response to PoetryHound:
PoetryHound-Just wanted to keep you busy looking at this post.
If you looking here than you can't be over there on another post. I am going to organize your opposition to join me in this strategy of keeping you busy by wasting your time. Eventualy you will become frustrated. Have fun chasing your sanity. If you are sick of PoetryHound copy this comment and past it as a reply to PoetryHound. Lets spam him into the Nut House.
alltvisanimated 4 years ago
So Senator Mark Dayton's criticisms are legitimate and credible? Good! Because he also thinks the planned demolition theory is bunk. Glad you think he's credible.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
right on!
tedisone2 5 years ago
WhatDIDN'TReallyHappen
http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_07_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html
PkofPk 5 years ago