Idiots guide to 9-11 debunking

[itsdonenow]

I love the way Truthers just make up their own "facts" and then get upset when no one wastes time to investigate their fairy tales.

[occision]

@itsdonenow such as.........

[jjaj6]

lol ya this is definetly mocking debunkers as well

[rongrosjean]

I love this video. You've got to watch more than the first minute to understand that this guy is mocking the official story.

We are winning this war of disinformation. Keep it up, all you 9/11 Truthers!!

[grandmastershek]

@rongrosjean Indeed...9/11 is being discussed at every dinner table, it turning son against father. Everywhere everyday you hear about 9/11 Truth. Woops now back to reality.

[soulinite]

The government couldn't cover up a blow job.

[occision]

@soulinite no that was a snowjob ...look up chinagate buddy ..dont buy the media bs .

[soulinite]

@occision So conspiracy theorist believe the blowjob was a government conspiracy?

[occision]

@soulinite I guess just another diversion .

[nobutur]

So Larry Silverstein was behind 911 as part of an insurance fraud? Bomb sniffing dogs were only there temporarily due to an earlier bomb threat. You're right, no evidence against Bin Laden except a taped confession. Substitute "debunker" for "troofer" and realize that you may very well be just as B.L.I.N.D. Alex Jones thanks you for your faithful service. Sorry if you think I'm a troll I just don't see any difference between what your doing and the debunkers you so obviously can't tolerate.

[soulinite]

@nobutur Alex Jones lives in a million dollar home in a gated community.

[nobutur]

So Larry Silverstein was behind 911 as part of an insurance fraud? Bomb sniffing dogs were only there temporarily due to an earlier bomb threat. You're right, no evidence against Bin Laden except a taped confession. Substitute "debunker" for "troofer" and realize that you may very well be just as B.L.I.N.D. Alex Jones thanks you for your faithful service. Sorry if you think I'm a troll I just don't see any difference between what your doing and the debunkers you so obviously can't tolerate.

[Synsacrus]

So this is basically about anyone arguing about anything ever?

[occision]

no I debate with out using trash talk and double speak .

[Synsacrus]

Arguing and debating are two totally different things; it is hard to find people who want a clean debate or discussion with no strings attached anymore.

[Synsacrus]

The point of my original comment being that this sort of thing usually happens from both sides regarding almost any topic; 'twas more a comment about modern tactics and ethics of discussion (which seem to be nonexistent anymore).

[occision]

yes 95% of 9-11 debunkers act like 3rd grade children .and thats not name calling its what really happens when confronting them with evidence .

thx for commenting!

[soulinite]

@occision Have you watched "science and conspiracy" yet? You might want to search youtube for it.

Also if you believe WTC 1,2 and 7 were taken down with controlled demolition then why was there no seismographic evidence?

[occision]

@soulinite that show was an absolute joke ..none of those so called experiments prove anything at all .. I actually have it saved on my comp ...

[soulinite]

@occision They prove jet fuel can weaken steel.

[occision]

@soulinite lol a very small beem with max exposure to 2000 degree heat lol ...wow thats genious ..no prominent has said that 2000 degrees wouldnt do that ..the prob is the temps were not 2000 degrees from the fire ...most of the jet fuel burned up in the initial explosion...

[soulinite]

@occision Office fires can reach temperatures high enough to weaken steel(especially steel that has has had all the fire proofing taken off it by a 767 jet). If office fires can't weak steel why are steel frame building fire proofed?

[occision]

@soulinite oh yea your right office fires explode buildings all the time ...

[soulinite]

@occision nothing exploded, the buildings collapsed do to a combination of structural damage and the steel weakening in the fires.

[occision]

@soulinite yea ok nothing exploded ..haaa ..yea concrete walls didnt explode in the basements ...never happened nope ...

[soulinite]

@occision What's your evidence for this?

[soulinite]

@occision How do you explain the lack of seismographic evidence? Controlled demolitions have a very distinctive seismographic signature.

[occision]

@soulinite there was seismographic evidence ..it even proves williams claim of a pre explosion seconds prior to the impact . audio from multipul cameras also clearly picked up the explosions going off .

[soulinite]

@occision What is your source for this?

[occision]

@soulinite 911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evide­nce/seismic .html along with audio of explosions right before each collapes . not to mention looking at a still photos about 3-4 seconds in clearly show explosive force not a natural collapse .

[soulinite]

@occision (*)ldeo(*)columbia(*)edu/LCSN/­Eq/20010911_wtc(*)html

mgs(*)md(*)gov/esic/publicatio­ns/download/911pentagon(*)pdf

[wrightlarryj]

Great job of profiling a debunker. Too bad it won't shock any of them into some real self analysis. I'm sure they will keep right on defending their fantasy of what America used to be before the criminals took over.

[Toxie207]

it's all so complicated. Truther X states piece of evidence A, to which debunker Y counters with explanation B. Then truther Z offers fact C etc etc etc ...... Everyone seems to have an agenda, making it near impossible for anyone to know what really happened that day.

[occision]

the only entity making it impossible to know what really happened that day is the gov. itself .

the 9-11 comish was a joke .

[xxxxdarksidexxxx]

we are not protected by the first amendment laws anymore...assuming that is bad. Also assuming all debunkers are a certain way is bad too. point being too much assumption already, and.....

and you sound scary as fuck, think u need a deit change. signed off at 50 seconds