Just look at the seriousness and the sense of patrotism by which these people are contesting the verdict of the Zimbabwean election. So busy with while the criminals in the AU are having a fields day. Don't these people understand that they can do the same thing to the Africa Union for a democratic, accountable, transparent, peaceful and properious Africa Union? Are these people aware the Zimbabwe remit a portion of their tax annually to the AU unaccountably?
Mugabe and Mbeki are just the same. South Africa Mbeki accepts the situation in Zimbabwe. What a fool to side with Bob....this is your status in ummmm maybe 5 years!
Let the white world stop screaming for change of president..help doesnt mean change goverment,it means HELP the goverment..dumb ass whites just making our country worse than ever just to tell us that they are boss..FUCK all you white people..your the cause for all this shit and your making it worse..i dont support Mugabe but whoever is in power can lift the economy with international help..u think Mugabe will refuse the world to help his country improve and im not talking about food aid
What Mugabe can do to help ease the crises in Zimbabwe is to lease (or rent) the lands he took from the colonial farmers back to them and simultaneously providing incentives needed in training indiginous farmers to help offset these farmines. I hope Mugabe is reading or listening. But to give back ownership of the lands back to the colonialists would be a massive error.
Diego Garcia and had bloody robbery histories relating to the occupation of other nations (which are now independent as of now). So Britain, back off Zimbabwe and mind your own business.
You do know we helped Mugabe against an evil white supremacist in Ian Smith right? Before Mugabe turned evil (which is after his wife died in the mid 90's)?
We don't like people who turn round and bite the hand that put them in power.
Yeah maybe; the British first put Mugabe in jail for about 10 years in his home land. They were not invited to forcefully take over power of another nation with brute force (and point a finger on someone else, calling them 'terrorists'). Mugabe probably also had a personal vendetta against the British. Will the British allow black Africans to occupy up to 85% of Britain (as they did in Zimbabwe)?
All these imbroglio would not have materialised in the first place if Britain did not invade Ireland in any way. The IRA is a militant wing of the Irish army. Overall, no nation on earth will like another to invade its sovereignty and take over its power. It is irrelevant whether or not a portion of Irish denizens will like to remain under the British (as many of these denizens are British also by denomination). Britain should unanimously leave Ireland.
Yeah. maybe all black people should leave the US too and all white people so the Native Indians can have their land back.
Maybe the French should give us back part of our kingdom too that they nicked.
But if you want to kick the people in Northern Ireland out or place them under rule from Eire be my guest. You'll have the "Troubles" all over, just in reverse with bombs going off in Dublin instead of Belfast.
The black people were forcefully taken to the US by the cacausians for their own selfish gains (not the blacks themselves invading). I aint talking about anyone migrating to another land(s) to live but anyone seizing power (savagely when necessary) of another country just because the invader have the weapons. It will be a great relief of freedom to the Irish (as a whole) to see their occupying captors leave or give power back to Ireland.
life, but for this main powerful reason, he will do anything (even barbaric to remain in power. Britain (and other European nations) has no right to interfere with Zimbabwe's political affairs (just like Zimbabwe has no rights in European national affairs). The so called "concerns" Britain is having for Zimbabwe is hypocritically idiotic; This is the same Britain as of now still forcefully occupying Northern island, Gibraltar (Spain), Falkland Islands (of Argentina),
Not so! I wathced a documentary concerning ireland and the narrator said Oliver Cromwell forcefully invaded Ireland to occupy it. This led to prolonged conflict between Britain and Ireland and the republic of Ireland was eventually formed. For the so called agreement? If that was the case, how come the IRA bitterly opposes Britain's occupation of NI such that simitex explosives were desperate measures to drive the British out of NI? Your so called 'agreement' is ilogical.
Yes and when the Republic was formed, they added an opt out clause for the mainly Protestant & Unionist North which allowed them to remain part of the UK if they wanted to. They chose to do this which upset the IRA (who aren't the same as the Irish state).
Might be illogical to you, but if you were a pro UK guy about to put under rule of an anti-UK government, wouldn't you take the opt out clause?
The main reason why Mugabe is behaving badly is probably because he's afraid his next successor might reverse what he had done and give the lands back to the colonialists (though Mugabe rightfully took back the lands but with bad management follow up plans, leading to all these farming). Apart from this, I see no other reason why he wants to stay in power after such a long time (since 1980). I think this man would have liked to step down from power and enjoy civilian
with good to me always". Returning bad back to me will trigger me to raise an alarm against you, branding you a terrorist or an evil personality. This is the basis of the colonial mentality; "we are the superior race; all other races are inferior". This is the most entirely evil mentality propagated via subtle means (especially via legal pathways) is the prototype colonial mentality. I don't care what others say, but this is the raw truth I see.
what the British did to Zimbabwe. Another reason why the British are hypocrites is that they covertly sell munitions weapons to Somalia, India, Pakistan etc, etc, used by the warlords to kill and make the lives of the citizens of these respective countries a great misery. Yet little or nothing is said about these evil activities; rather much is said about the activities of Mugabe. This is the colonial mentality: "I can do to you badly and anyhow I like; but I expect you to return it
owning 85% of the Zimbabwean lands; something which will never happen in reverse). Secondly, it might be a personal thing triggering Mugabe's rightful land acquisition: He was tossed into jail by the British colonial regime for decades as a freedom fighter, resisting colonial rule. Will a stranger enter someone's house through brute force, take the best parts of that person's house and arresting him in the less favourable parts of his (owner's) house and be good or honest? Exactly
For goodness sake; why is Britain poking its nose into Zimbabwe's affairs? (Though I am not a Mugabe (an evil man) supporter, but the so-called concerns Britain have over Mugabe's running of Zimbabwe is frightening. These British's concerns are artificial. It has nothing to do with Mugabe's harsh rule, but truly rather due to unjust vengeful anger over Mugabe rightfully taking back the lands the British forcefully acquired via colonial rule (imagine British civilians
The country was always betrayed by South Africa. First they stopped their support of Rhodesia, now under black leadership they support Mugabe. How stupid are they?
Robert Mugabe must go. He has drivin the country into the ground. And South Africa's president says there is no crsis in Zimbabwe! he doesn't know what he is taking about.
Just look at the seriousness and the sense of patrotism by which these people are contesting the verdict of the Zimbabwean election. So busy with while the criminals in the AU are having a fields day. Don't these people understand that they can do the same thing to the Africa Union for a democratic, accountable, transparent, peaceful and properious Africa Union? Are these people aware the Zimbabwe remit a portion of their tax annually to the AU unaccountably?
ActionGroupA 2 years ago
Willing buter,willing seller.Britain doesn't want that,they want the land for free
osagyefoghana 3 years ago
Mugabe and Mbeki are just the same. South Africa Mbeki accepts the situation in Zimbabwe. What a fool to side with Bob....this is your status in ummmm maybe 5 years!
Lillypanda2 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Let the white world stop screaming for change of president..help doesnt mean change goverment,it means HELP the goverment..dumb ass whites just making our country worse than ever just to tell us that they are boss..FUCK all you white people..your the cause for all this shit and your making it worse..i dont support Mugabe but whoever is in power can lift the economy with international help..u think Mugabe will refuse the world to help his country improve and im not talking about food aid
mhthekidd 3 years ago
What Mugabe can do to help ease the crises in Zimbabwe is to lease (or rent) the lands he took from the colonial farmers back to them and simultaneously providing incentives needed in training indiginous farmers to help offset these farmines. I hope Mugabe is reading or listening. But to give back ownership of the lands back to the colonialists would be a massive error.
7olusegun 3 years ago
This is the raw bitter truth
7olusegun 3 years ago
Diego Garcia and had bloody robbery histories relating to the occupation of other nations (which are now independent as of now). So Britain, back off Zimbabwe and mind your own business.
7olusegun 3 years ago
You do know we helped Mugabe against an evil white supremacist in Ian Smith right? Before Mugabe turned evil (which is after his wife died in the mid 90's)?
We don't like people who turn round and bite the hand that put them in power.
theredraven 3 years ago
Yeah maybe; the British first put Mugabe in jail for about 10 years in his home land. They were not invited to forcefully take over power of another nation with brute force (and point a finger on someone else, calling them 'terrorists'). Mugabe probably also had a personal vendetta against the British. Will the British allow black Africans to occupy up to 85% of Britain (as they did in Zimbabwe)?
7olusegun 3 years ago
All these imbroglio would not have materialised in the first place if Britain did not invade Ireland in any way. The IRA is a militant wing of the Irish army. Overall, no nation on earth will like another to invade its sovereignty and take over its power. It is irrelevant whether or not a portion of Irish denizens will like to remain under the British (as many of these denizens are British also by denomination). Britain should unanimously leave Ireland.
7olusegun 3 years ago
Yeah. maybe all black people should leave the US too and all white people so the Native Indians can have their land back.
Maybe the French should give us back part of our kingdom too that they nicked.
But if you want to kick the people in Northern Ireland out or place them under rule from Eire be my guest. You'll have the "Troubles" all over, just in reverse with bombs going off in Dublin instead of Belfast.
Leaving doesn't sound so smart now does it?
theredraven 3 years ago
The black people were forcefully taken to the US by the cacausians for their own selfish gains (not the blacks themselves invading). I aint talking about anyone migrating to another land(s) to live but anyone seizing power (savagely when necessary) of another country just because the invader have the weapons. It will be a great relief of freedom to the Irish (as a whole) to see their occupying captors leave or give power back to Ireland.
7olusegun 3 years ago
life, but for this main powerful reason, he will do anything (even barbaric to remain in power. Britain (and other European nations) has no right to interfere with Zimbabwe's political affairs (just like Zimbabwe has no rights in European national affairs). The so called "concerns" Britain is having for Zimbabwe is hypocritically idiotic; This is the same Britain as of now still forcefully occupying Northern island, Gibraltar (Spain), Falkland Islands (of Argentina),
7olusegun 3 years ago
The Falklan islands were actually signd over to us about 150 years ago by Argentina so we aren't forcefully occupying it at all.
And Ireland agreed that the counties of NI could opt out of the Irish Republic if they wanted. Oh dear, you need to read a history book don't you?
theredraven 3 years ago
Not so! I wathced a documentary concerning ireland and the narrator said Oliver Cromwell forcefully invaded Ireland to occupy it. This led to prolonged conflict between Britain and Ireland and the republic of Ireland was eventually formed. For the so called agreement? If that was the case, how come the IRA bitterly opposes Britain's occupation of NI such that simitex explosives were desperate measures to drive the British out of NI? Your so called 'agreement' is ilogical.
7olusegun 3 years ago
Yes and when the Republic was formed, they added an opt out clause for the mainly Protestant & Unionist North which allowed them to remain part of the UK if they wanted to. They chose to do this which upset the IRA (who aren't the same as the Irish state).
Might be illogical to you, but if you were a pro UK guy about to put under rule of an anti-UK government, wouldn't you take the opt out clause?
theredraven 3 years ago
The main reason why Mugabe is behaving badly is probably because he's afraid his next successor might reverse what he had done and give the lands back to the colonialists (though Mugabe rightfully took back the lands but with bad management follow up plans, leading to all these farming). Apart from this, I see no other reason why he wants to stay in power after such a long time (since 1980). I think this man would have liked to step down from power and enjoy civilian
7olusegun 3 years ago
with good to me always". Returning bad back to me will trigger me to raise an alarm against you, branding you a terrorist or an evil personality. This is the basis of the colonial mentality; "we are the superior race; all other races are inferior". This is the most entirely evil mentality propagated via subtle means (especially via legal pathways) is the prototype colonial mentality. I don't care what others say, but this is the raw truth I see.
7olusegun 3 years ago
what the British did to Zimbabwe. Another reason why the British are hypocrites is that they covertly sell munitions weapons to Somalia, India, Pakistan etc, etc, used by the warlords to kill and make the lives of the citizens of these respective countries a great misery. Yet little or nothing is said about these evil activities; rather much is said about the activities of Mugabe. This is the colonial mentality: "I can do to you badly and anyhow I like; but I expect you to return it
7olusegun 3 years ago
I don't see the Indian or Pakistani governments starving their own people to death.
And no, we don't supply weapons to Islamic nutters in Somalia. We leave that to the Chinese to do.
theredraven 3 years ago
owning 85% of the Zimbabwean lands; something which will never happen in reverse). Secondly, it might be a personal thing triggering Mugabe's rightful land acquisition: He was tossed into jail by the British colonial regime for decades as a freedom fighter, resisting colonial rule. Will a stranger enter someone's house through brute force, take the best parts of that person's house and arresting him in the less favourable parts of his (owner's) house and be good or honest? Exactly
7olusegun 3 years ago
For goodness sake; why is Britain poking its nose into Zimbabwe's affairs? (Though I am not a Mugabe (an evil man) supporter, but the so-called concerns Britain have over Mugabe's running of Zimbabwe is frightening. These British's concerns are artificial. It has nothing to do with Mugabe's harsh rule, but truly rather due to unjust vengeful anger over Mugabe rightfully taking back the lands the British forcefully acquired via colonial rule (imagine British civilians
7olusegun 3 years ago
Damn, her nostrils are HUGE!
lunaris19 3 years ago
The country was always betrayed by South Africa. First they stopped their support of Rhodesia, now under black leadership they support Mugabe. How stupid are they?
Chipimbere 3 years ago
Robert Mugabe must go. He has drivin the country into the ground. And South Africa's president says there is no crsis in Zimbabwe! he doesn't know what he is taking about.
trotsnbok 3 years ago
after the arms arrive, the crisis will be over.
moviedude111 3 years ago