Added: 3 years ago
From: ikaz47
Views: 879
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Eh...Just from the trailer I still go with the original, its more realistic than the new one(Just the technological explanations, story, characters). And there using Macs?!?!! See that's the quality and believability of using DOS in the original(Well, actually DOS was the only thing around). And in the new one he doesn't hack the supercomputer he lazily plays a online game :P Quiet un-original.

  • nice review, keep it up

  • my cousin is in that movie he plays Will Farmer

  • OMG, you mean the actress playing 17 WASN'T 17??? NO!

    O.O; My world view is shattered.

    Uhm, Older actors play younger roles ALL THE TIME. Matthew Broderick and Ally sheedy were 21 in the orginal, Michael j fox was 25 playing 17 in the first back to the future, and in his thirties by te tine of 2 and 3.

    OMG, get your head in reality.

  • Well, the difference is that the actress in the original actually looked like a teenager. The girl they picked for this movie looked like she was in her mid twenties. I know that most of the time women in their early twenties play 17 and 18 year olds, but if they pick a woman who was a bit too old to play the part, that's what I have a problem with.

  • suck my ****

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more