Added: 2 years ago
From: LechuCzechu
Views: 19,980
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BTW. Happy Birthday Gen. Yeager. Feb. 13th 2012. 89 years old.

  • usterdboy: LOL I'm hardly British. I was raised on USAF bases around the world. Obviously you missed the TIC comment. Airplanes suffering compressability and losing control happened a lot during the war. Even Gen. Yeager was almost a victim of that very thing. Too much speed in a dive claimed many a pilot. General Yeager is one of my most admired men. LOL and don't let your mommy find out you are calling people names. She might take away your computer.

  • Today is the anniversary of Mr. Yeager's brave achievement. Thank you sir.

  • @Freeleacher Could woulda shoulda, did not.

  • 0:41 Yeager and Gen, Albert G. Boyd, 0:55 Jack Ridley, flight engineer The roll at 3:00 was against all USAF regulations

  • Oh Yeah! Everybody , On the subject on rather the sound barrier had been broken during the war well before Yeager in '47. I'm sure it had been broken during the war. Probably several times! Also, probably by pilots in a ballsout dive trying to get away from a pursueing fighter shooting them down and being broken 5 seconds before the a/c drilled a hole in the ground.

  • @byron500 Yes, everytime a great technical threshold is crossed, there's always stuff like that. The wright brothers, Spirit of St. Louis, Voyager, etc.. History and historians have a way of brushing off all that 'kinda, sorta, almost' crap and focusing on the real deals.

  • @byron500 Hey idiot the X-1 was the first. I guess your British though "god forgive you for being a stupid brit"

  • Hardly stolen British secrets. I doubt there was much in the way of secrets between the British and the Americans specifically with technology. The marriage of British powerplants and the North American P-51 design for example.

  • Well done Yanks. Amazing what you can do with stolen BRITISH technology.

  • @betulakevinii now what did WE Steal.

  • @hawker445 It was the British who solved the X-1's stability problems by moving the whole tailplane instead of just the rear section of it as was done previously but now the Americans claim that it was them who discovered it when everyone esle knows it wasn't

  • @aspiringdrummer17 any facts to support that?

    And i dont know what you mean by "moving the whole tailplane instead of just the rear section of it as was done previously" that doesn't make any sense im in aviation but ive never heard of a tail plane. Do you mean the tail section?

  • @hawker445 You are mistaken, check Wikipedia for: "tailplane".

  • @betulakevinii oh, and you should be thanking us. with out the US germany would have created the 1st atomic weapon, would have made all of the secret jet aircraft which would have dominated the skies, britian would have been destroyed if it weren't for the US .of course there were other countries but we sent in more troops and supplies than any other foreign country. oh and may i remind you that britians economy was a bust after WW2

  • @hawker445 A fair point, well made. We won the war but we lost the peace.

  • This is a copy of the Me 163 third rich of nazi germany rocket plane

  • @Burdock007 not even close

  • It was remarkable that a straight-winged aircraft was able to crack the sound barrier. Yeager had "The Right Stuff" to make the attempt at something that was extremely hazardous. The parachute he had would have been useless in an emergency: There was no way he could have safely egressed from this aircraft. Full kudos to our British cousins for all of their expertise in aircraft design, but I would also remind them that Geoffrey DeHavilland died in his attempt on the sound barrier.

  • @usafvet100 And the British had pretty much given up on braking the "Sound Barrier" after losing De Havilland. I'm not for giving them any credit on the aircraft design either. 'Specially since the "Swallow" was tailless. Quite frankly. If not for Jack Ridley. I wonder if the Speed of Sound would have been broken in '47.

  • What a crock, a blimped out version of the ME-163. They should have had some integrity and put the swastika on the tail.

  • U.S. efforts progressed apace soon after Britain had disclosed all its research and designs to the U.S. government on the promise that U.S. information would be shared the other way - a promise that the Americans did not keep.

  • United Kingdom's Ministry of Aviation began a top secret project with Miles Aircraft to develop the world's first aircraft capable of breaking the sound barrier. The project resulted in the development of the prototype Miles M.52 jet aircraft, which was designed to reach 1,000 mph (417 m/s; 1,600 km/h) at 36,000 ft (11 km) in 1 minute 30 sec.

  • 2:54 Do a barrel roll!

  • Listen, I love the Brits: your humor, TV shows, music, awesome accents, emotional detachment, eloquence, etc. Sometimes I even feel like I was British in a former life or something... But man, do you guys have a wicked inferiority complex. Relax - you're awesome. As much as people love to rag on America, we've accomplished a hell of a lot in 235 years. And in engineering, just like in music, art, literature, business - THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT. (Da Vinci excluded.)

  • Ah the famous aileron roll that nearly killed him

  • @wellytopjohnny so true. It was british research and technology that broke the sound barrier! The americans just stoll it.

  • I miss the B-29 just as much :(

  • Anyone ever think of using this video to debunk the "chem-trails" theory?

  • @wellytopjohnny 5 years?

    Spec. issue: X1-Dec 44, Mockup Oct 45, 1st Flight Dec 46, SS Oct 47..

    Spec M.52-Fall 43, Early 46 the UK sent over design info which in themselves were not fully completed.

    Bell had no idea of the M.52 due to secrecy.

    Around the time that Yeager stated the elevators were useless at .94 was before British design data was available.

    Ridley suggested an "auxiliary pitch mechanism" and the rest is SS history ;)

  • @wellytopjohnny The Bell X1s fuselage was designed before any data was shared by the British and was from the beginning a rocket powered aircraft. Yeager even mentioned in his notes that a full flying-wing was useless at .94. Brit data transfer was not very useful, also the moving tail-plane were on German planes of the past. Miles debacle was trying jet power with the straight wings of the time. Typical British, whining because they don't receive the attention of the past.

  • typical Americans

    stolen British ideas

  • Wonderful! I've been looking for this longer version for years.

    I have the 39 sec official Dryden clip. Well done!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more