Antony Flew does not discount the possibility of a naturalistic origin for life, and evolution (again, you guys always need to bring that up, and then say we're changing the subject when we address it). He's NOT a theist; he's a deist. Funny that you keep calling him "my boy" when he dispelled Christianity in its entirety.
@AtheisticFreeThinker You're aware the poster of this video isn't the guy in the video? the guy in the vid doesn't allow comments on his videos, also Flew died last year and the parasites who plagued him towards the end of his life are now claiming he became christian
I have noticed that many christians censor their pages and many disable the like or dislike voting. I guess when you live in a glass house, You have to control all the stones!
No matter. I like what Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson said. "I don't want you to take my word for it. I don't want you to quote me! I want you to go out and figure it out for yourself."
Funny how you give the satellite phone example. Because your assumptions are laughable, 1) if we were to find a advanced piece of communications device that allowed us to talk with creatures from outside the world. scientists would be trilled, just by thinking of the scientific collaboration or the things we can learn from them. BUT can you with no doubt tell me that a religious person might consider that as devils tool for deceiving us. And that it should be destroyed ?
@davelantor These guys always come up with stuff that has been designed/invented by man, the say "what would you think if you found a watch in the sand? would you think it came about through chance?" forgetting the watch isn't organic or animate and the fact it was made to aid humans. or a whirlwind creating a jumbo jet in a junk yard, then earnestly tell you (& expect you to believe) a magic man made you out of mud! where did the magic man come from? he's the only thing that needs no designer
I watched the original and saw straight through the bullshit, he talks to atheists in the video but doesn't allow Atheists to comment, same old story censor comments to avoid looking a twat. It says something about non Atheist viewers/commentators who don't see through comment censoring, you can't censor real life
Your an ignorant twat. Flew is a deist. He still considers your god to be false. Also: you use the tired watchmaker argument. Im sure that if you wernt so scared of the truth, and allowed comments, the flaws in it would have been made blatantly apparent. We know a phone is designed because theres no natural process that creates them. You cant equate a phone to life BECAUSE PHONES DONT REPRODUCE!! Could your arguments get any more pathetic?
@sakar181 Judging from your comment, you`re an ignorant twat yourself.
This guy NEVER said a thing about what kind of God Flew eventually accepted. Deism (as you surely know) falls under the umbrella of general theism. Btw, Flew actually passed away last year I believe (R.I.P.).
"You cant equate a phone to life BECAUSE PHONES DONT REPRODUCE"
You seem to have forgotten that the very first self-replicating system would have aquired the ability to reproduce WITHOUT self-replication.
Oi. Deism and theism are NOT the same 'basic' thing. One asserts that god cares about what you eat, drink, and who you fuck. the other postulates a non-interventionist god. VERY different. TAA is a moron who thinks they are equal. Also: abiogensis [the origin of life(self replicating things)] is not evolution. Hence the reason the watchmaker argument fails miserably, like ray comfort...and you. Care to rebut anything, or you gonna run away?
@sakar181 Yes they ARE the same basic thing in that they both affirm the existence of "A" God. You can play semantics all you like. Theism in itself isn`t some religion.
"Abiogenesis is not evolution"
I WAS talking about abiogenesis you idiot. Aside from the fact that self-replicating systems are obviously more complex than nonself-replicating systems, your objection to design doesn`t apply to the first self replicating system.
You want to equate deism and theism. I explained the very clear difference, they are not the same in that one is much more encompassing. If you want to say that a god who answers your personal whims is the same as a god who is worthless, be my guest. And yes, theism IS religion. If you say it isnt, your retarded. And we dont know enough about the first organisms to factually argue about this. You may thing you have the info, but you dont.
@sakar181 Wait a minute ... did you just actually say that THEISM in itself is a religion??? WTF??? LMAO ... and then you have the nerve to call ME retarded?
Go away little boy. I don`t have time for amateurs.
@sakar181 And the difference between saying "theism is a religion" and saying "theism is religion" is???
You realize there are millions and millions of theists who follow no religion, right? On a side note, there are actually atheistic religions. I bet your simple ass hasn`t discovered that either, huh?
@sakar181 First you said "Theism IS religion". Now you say "I know of atheistic religions". How can there be atheistic religions when you just asserted that theism IS religion (which is complete bullshit in itself)?
You are one pedantic little fuckwit. There are shades of gray that the world exists in. You seem to be a black and white type of prick. You can kindly jump into boiling tar. Twat.
@sakar181 You know, it doesn`t hurt to admit you were wrong. No need for all the childish insults. You were wrong. I just showed you why you`re flat out wrong. You can`t say "theism is religion" (whatever the fuck that means) and then turn around and admit there are atheistic religions. Theism (by itself) is in no way shape or form a religion anymore than atheism is a religion.
@sakar181 To be honest, I actually enjoy ad hominems. I only dislike them when people use them to try and steer away from the fact they just put their foot in their mouth.
@sakar181 you can't have different Atheist religions, that's like having different types of asymmetry, you can have different types of symmetry, but you can't have different types of asymmetry, and obliviously you get different types of theist religion
Looneys gonna loon.
NFM1337 2 months ago
Antony Flew does not discount the possibility of a naturalistic origin for life, and evolution (again, you guys always need to bring that up, and then say we're changing the subject when we address it). He's NOT a theist; he's a deist. Funny that you keep calling him "my boy" when he dispelled Christianity in its entirety.
AtheisticFreeThinker 10 months ago
@AtheisticFreeThinker You're aware the poster of this video isn't the guy in the video? the guy in the vid doesn't allow comments on his videos, also Flew died last year and the parasites who plagued him towards the end of his life are now claiming he became christian
JoshuaTrio 10 months ago
TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT TWAT
marcoticon 1 year ago
I have noticed that many christians censor their pages and many disable the like or dislike voting. I guess when you live in a glass house, You have to control all the stones!
No matter. I like what Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson said. "I don't want you to take my word for it. I don't want you to quote me! I want you to go out and figure it out for yourself."
You will never hear a preacher say that!!
yrunuts1962 1 year ago
@yrunuts1962 I hear mine say it all the time.
Fail.
BeLogicalWillU 1 year ago
BeLogicalWillU, that is rather funny! The video that you have on your home page has the comments disabled! LOL!!! Control the stones! LOL!
yrunuts1962 1 year ago
@yrunuts1962 LOL! Yeah...LOL! That's to keep LOL! fucktards out LOL!
You writing LOL! a book LOL! about it? LOL!
BeLogicalWillU 1 year ago
Funny how you give the satellite phone example. Because your assumptions are laughable, 1) if we were to find a advanced piece of communications device that allowed us to talk with creatures from outside the world. scientists would be trilled, just by thinking of the scientific collaboration or the things we can learn from them. BUT can you with no doubt tell me that a religious person might consider that as devils tool for deceiving us. And that it should be destroyed ?
davelantor 1 year ago
@davelantor These guys always come up with stuff that has been designed/invented by man, the say "what would you think if you found a watch in the sand? would you think it came about through chance?" forgetting the watch isn't organic or animate and the fact it was made to aid humans. or a whirlwind creating a jumbo jet in a junk yard, then earnestly tell you (& expect you to believe) a magic man made you out of mud! where did the magic man come from? he's the only thing that needs no designer
WaIterEgo 1 year ago
@WaIterEgo i agree
davelantor 1 year ago
What the fuck is he talking about... First 2 minutes and already he seems delusional.
Biowasters 1 year ago
I never heard of Flew until he became a deist.
(You didn't have to post the whole of that video.)
SueDoeNimm3 1 year ago
@SueDoeNimm3 "(You didn't have to post the whole of that video.)" I didn't want to be accused of editing anything out, plus it's quite funny
WaIterEgo 1 year ago
I watched the original and saw straight through the bullshit, he talks to atheists in the video but doesn't allow Atheists to comment, same old story censor comments to avoid looking a twat. It says something about non Atheist viewers/commentators who don't see through comment censoring, you can't censor real life
hughjarrse 1 year ago
@TheAtheistAntidote
Your an ignorant twat. Flew is a deist. He still considers your god to be false. Also: you use the tired watchmaker argument. Im sure that if you wernt so scared of the truth, and allowed comments, the flaws in it would have been made blatantly apparent. We know a phone is designed because theres no natural process that creates them. You cant equate a phone to life BECAUSE PHONES DONT REPRODUCE!! Could your arguments get any more pathetic?
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 Judging from your comment, you`re an ignorant twat yourself.
This guy NEVER said a thing about what kind of God Flew eventually accepted. Deism (as you surely know) falls under the umbrella of general theism. Btw, Flew actually passed away last year I believe (R.I.P.).
"You cant equate a phone to life BECAUSE PHONES DONT REPRODUCE"
You seem to have forgotten that the very first self-replicating system would have aquired the ability to reproduce WITHOUT self-replication.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
Oi. Deism and theism are NOT the same 'basic' thing. One asserts that god cares about what you eat, drink, and who you fuck. the other postulates a non-interventionist god. VERY different. TAA is a moron who thinks they are equal. Also: abiogensis [the origin of life(self replicating things)] is not evolution. Hence the reason the watchmaker argument fails miserably, like ray comfort...and you. Care to rebut anything, or you gonna run away?
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 Yes they ARE the same basic thing in that they both affirm the existence of "A" God. You can play semantics all you like. Theism in itself isn`t some religion.
"Abiogenesis is not evolution"
I WAS talking about abiogenesis you idiot. Aside from the fact that self-replicating systems are obviously more complex than nonself-replicating systems, your objection to design doesn`t apply to the first self replicating system.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
You want to equate deism and theism. I explained the very clear difference, they are not the same in that one is much more encompassing. If you want to say that a god who answers your personal whims is the same as a god who is worthless, be my guest. And yes, theism IS religion. If you say it isnt, your retarded. And we dont know enough about the first organisms to factually argue about this. You may thing you have the info, but you dont.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 Wait a minute ... did you just actually say that THEISM in itself is a religion??? WTF??? LMAO ... and then you have the nerve to call ME retarded?
Go away little boy. I don`t have time for amateurs.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
I didnt say that theism is *a* religion, I said theism *IS* religion. READ.
Piss off.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 And the difference between saying "theism is a religion" and saying "theism is religion" is???
You realize there are millions and millions of theists who follow no religion, right? On a side note, there are actually atheistic religions. I bet your simple ass hasn`t discovered that either, huh?
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
Im not going to explain this to you. if you dont understand this, get the fuck off of the internet until you know what you're talking about.
And yes, I know of atheistic religions. I find them wrong too. Once again, piss off, you waste of skin.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 First you said "Theism IS religion". Now you say "I know of atheistic religions". How can there be atheistic religions when you just asserted that theism IS religion (which is complete bullshit in itself)?
Kill yourself.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
You are one pedantic little fuckwit. There are shades of gray that the world exists in. You seem to be a black and white type of prick. You can kindly jump into boiling tar. Twat.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 You know, it doesn`t hurt to admit you were wrong. No need for all the childish insults. You were wrong. I just showed you why you`re flat out wrong. You can`t say "theism is religion" (whatever the fuck that means) and then turn around and admit there are atheistic religions. Theism (by itself) is in no way shape or form a religion anymore than atheism is a religion.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
You tell me that there's no need for insults after you tell me to kill myself. You have no credibility whatsoever.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 To be honest, I actually enjoy ad hominems. I only dislike them when people use them to try and steer away from the fact they just put their foot in their mouth.
CasperTheMeanieGhost 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
Yea, I bet you love the ad hom. You still have no credibility, and you still are a fucking hypocritical prick. Fuck off.
sakar181 1 year ago
@sakar181 you can't have different Atheist religions, that's like having different types of asymmetry, you can have different types of symmetry, but you can't have different types of asymmetry, and obliviously you get different types of theist religion
WaIterEgo 1 year ago
@CasperTheMeanieGhost
Heres the direct quote to make it easy on your simple fucking brain: 'And yes, theism IS religion. '
Fuck off.
sakar181 1 year ago