What a bunch of immature idiots. All they are doing is making people hate them. If they want to debate the issues, organise a debate, rather than ruining someone else's.
What a bunch of immature idiots. All they are doing is making people hate them. If they want to debate the issues, organise a debate, rather than ruining someone else's.
The protestors, were protesting Dawkins involvement with New College for the Humanities, they didn't really care for the inalienable rights of the audience who had payed for the talk, that is the point of a *protest*. I'm quite sure they will carry on until Dawkins et al pull out of NCH.
Interesting that this is what the liberal left really looks like. >> the comments below, and the odious comments from a largely gendered audience.
They make themselves look like idiots by disrupting an event that had nothing to do with them, and probably couldn't help them anything. If anything they should be protesting parliament.
And 18000 pounds? That's about 29000 in American dollars, which is remarkably cheap compared to private universities in America. You come across as entitled brats.
@Robotocracy And America obviously has it right. The super rich should be entitled to keep paying minimal taxes while the lower classes pay huge amounts to educate themselves to fulfil their desire to contribute more to society and live a marginally better life.
@ninjabob2456 It's interesting how you distort my words by turning a complicated problem into a black and white issue. The deficit in the UK has reached staggering amounts, and there has to be spending cuts somewhere. Is reducing funding to universities still a bad idea? Perhaps, but this is a debate to be had elsewhere - They make themselves look like assholes by disrupting an unrelated event to complain about something they still have a lot better than much of the rest of the world.
@Robotocracy "The deficit in the UK has reached staggering amounts, and there has to be spending cuts somewhere. Is reducing funding to universities still a bad idea? Perhaps, but this is a debate to be had elsewhere."
Where do you stand on the issue of price controls in general? To me it appears the government has a problematic role to play on both ends of the issue you explained. Yet, do you recognize that it's a catch-22? God damn socialism is destroying the UK and the British culture.
@Robotocracy So, because we do it better than much of the rest of the world, and have done for a long time, isn't a good reason to protect the way it is?
Although this looks like a "fast and hard" cut, the government won't see ANY money whatsoever from tuition fees for at least four years, by which time graduates will supposedly be paying back less than ever. Four years seems a long time to wait for an emergency policy to pay back anyway. Does that make sense?
I don't quite get this either. If they don't want to pay the money, then don't go to school there...
And hell, 18000 pounds isn't horrible. That's, at the moment, about 29k in dollars. If you wanted to go to Johns Hopkins university in the USA, you're looking at $40k (24.5k pounds).
The government no longer wants to fund education, private institutions come into fill the gap providing quality (albeit expensive American-style) education, and the protesters get angry at the institutions? I'm totally confused.
"Cuts! Job losses! Money for the bosses! Richard Dawkins get out, we know what you're all about."
As someone already said, completely incoherent. Sounded like the typical "pissed at the world" student ranting to me.
Completely agree about the police response. Absolutely limp wristed. As it turned out they appeared to be waiting for about 8 of their colleagues to arrive. Quite why is beyond me. They're not exactly organised thugs.
I was there in the front row. It was a pointless demonstration. I still don't know what their point was. They held up the talk for half an hour and interupted it twice. I'm not sure but I think that the talk may also have been cut short because of it.
They really went about this the wrong way. I totally agree that these raising tutition fees are ridiculous, but Dawkins should not be targeted. With that logic, they should target ALL lecturers teaching at ALL high-charging universities.
Just a few hot heads whom instead of staying in and watching emmerdale farm thought they'd launch some garbled attack on a public event for a bit of 'street cred' down on campus. Dawkins later stated he give all of his profit from speaking to charity...so...instead of just shouting, how would the protesters respond to that particular point and the fact that rather than taking their protest to the relevant platform it was a lazy attempt to shoot down a high profile victim of a much larger issue?
While this may not be the proper venue for a protest on that subject, it does strike me as bizarre to charge £18,000 tuition. In my experience, most of the benefit of university education came from the texts and interacting with other students. With a few exceptions (e.g. labs) the buildings and profs were secondary, and I contend are optional for most first and second-year courses. In those years, tuition should not exceed $2000 per year for most students.
From PZ Myers —"The cause for the chaos was peculiar to me: they were protesting AC Grayling's proposed new university, which would have an £18,000 tuition, twice what other universities charge. It seems silly to demonstrate over Richard Dawkins, who has only agreed to lecture there, or AC Grayling, who just wants a good education in the liberal arts for students, or the university itself, when the real cause of the problem is declining political support for a cheap education."
Yes, clearly Richard Dawkins has picked the wrong thing to go have an issue with. I mean, just look at these perfectly reasonable, mature religionists demonstrating how much we should respect them and their imaginary friend.
@integralmath They weren't actually theists, just left wing students protesting high education costs in front of an audience who might have sympathized with them had they not acted like a bunch of twats.
@NegativeNick The university exists! That's not the problem for people who can't afford access to education, their problem is that the government isn't funding education. When that happens of course more private colleges are going to spring up, blame the fucking government. Don't protest a humanist event which has fuck all to do with your cause! You guys came across as incoherent idiots making noise and annoying people who couldn't fix your problems if they wanted to!
This is the weirdest fucking thing i have seen in a while.
The police seemed unsure, and didn't do their job, just kinda stood by and made sure things didn't get too crazy. But they were obviously "causing a disturbance" or whatever the equivalent british law would be.
Then everybody, collectively, suddenly decide to turn their back to the protesters, as if to signal to the protesters that they were not paying attention/care to hear their message.
What were they saying?
uriituw 8 months ago
mighty mighty morphins ?
0900jarman 8 months ago
what the blinding fuck is wrong with these kids?! what were they protesting over?
nighrage 8 months ago
Comment removed
toradrivic 8 months ago
Comment removed
toradrivic 8 months ago
Youtube provides all of the lectures you need, people.
Emanresu56 8 months ago
@Emanresu56 Try getting a job with your YouTube degree. Tell me how it turns out.
HybridD91 8 months ago
@HybridD91 And how many jobs are available in the Academic world?
Emanresu56 8 months ago
Mon the protesters!
Mjhavok 8 months ago
The best part is when the crowd breaks out into reciting Monty Python's Life of Brian.
tjduck85 8 months ago
Why doesn't the crowd just leave them to themselves.
spareaxe 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a bunch of immature idiots. All they are doing is making people hate them. If they want to debate the issues, organise a debate, rather than ruining someone else's.
paulnuk 8 months ago
What a bunch of immature idiots. All they are doing is making people hate them. If they want to debate the issues, organise a debate, rather than ruining someone else's.
paulnuk 8 months ago
At what point does a *humanist* audience shout shoot, shoot, shoot at protestors? That was a significant escalation.
It seems to be certain freemarket humanism, absolutely accepting of and complicit with capitalist exploitation.
novarakollektiv 8 months ago
@novarakollektiv Pardon? I was there and I heard no such thing. Had you forgotten to take your medication?
neighbour666 8 months ago
The protestors, were protesting Dawkins involvement with New College for the Humanities, they didn't really care for the inalienable rights of the audience who had payed for the talk, that is the point of a *protest*. I'm quite sure they will carry on until Dawkins et al pull out of NCH.
Interesting that this is what the liberal left really looks like. >> the comments below, and the odious comments from a largely gendered audience.
novarakollektiv 8 months ago
They make themselves look like idiots by disrupting an event that had nothing to do with them, and probably couldn't help them anything. If anything they should be protesting parliament.
And 18000 pounds? That's about 29000 in American dollars, which is remarkably cheap compared to private universities in America. You come across as entitled brats.
Robotocracy 8 months ago 4
@Robotocracy And America obviously has it right. The super rich should be entitled to keep paying minimal taxes while the lower classes pay huge amounts to educate themselves to fulfil their desire to contribute more to society and live a marginally better life.
Poor people don't deserve healthcare either.
ninjabob2456 8 months ago 2
@ninjabob2456 It's interesting how you distort my words by turning a complicated problem into a black and white issue. The deficit in the UK has reached staggering amounts, and there has to be spending cuts somewhere. Is reducing funding to universities still a bad idea? Perhaps, but this is a debate to be had elsewhere - They make themselves look like assholes by disrupting an unrelated event to complain about something they still have a lot better than much of the rest of the world.
Robotocracy 8 months ago
@Robotocracy "The deficit in the UK has reached staggering amounts, and there has to be spending cuts somewhere. Is reducing funding to universities still a bad idea? Perhaps, but this is a debate to be had elsewhere."
Where do you stand on the issue of price controls in general? To me it appears the government has a problematic role to play on both ends of the issue you explained. Yet, do you recognize that it's a catch-22? God damn socialism is destroying the UK and the British culture.
DOHC2L 8 months ago
@Robotocracy So, because we do it better than much of the rest of the world, and have done for a long time, isn't a good reason to protect the way it is?
Although this looks like a "fast and hard" cut, the government won't see ANY money whatsoever from tuition fees for at least four years, by which time graduates will supposedly be paying back less than ever. Four years seems a long time to wait for an emergency policy to pay back anyway. Does that make sense?
ninjabob2456 8 months ago
I don't quite get this either. If they don't want to pay the money, then don't go to school there...
And hell, 18000 pounds isn't horrible. That's, at the moment, about 29k in dollars. If you wanted to go to Johns Hopkins university in the USA, you're looking at $40k (24.5k pounds).
KemaTheAtheist 8 months ago
"Education is a right! You don't need to pay *eighteen thousand pounds*!!!!!"
Ridiculous. Why don't you go and protest at fee-paying primary and secondary schools, where it actually IS a right to have education for free.
OckamsLaser 8 months ago
The government no longer wants to fund education, private institutions come into fill the gap providing quality (albeit expensive American-style) education, and the protesters get angry at the institutions? I'm totally confused.
coasterpro 8 months ago 2
So noisy. Can't they make a lucid statement instead.
CrimsonRefractions 8 months ago
For those who asked, they're chanting:
"Cuts! Job losses! Money for the bosses! Richard Dawkins get out, we know what you're all about."
As someone already said, completely incoherent. Sounded like the typical "pissed at the world" student ranting to me.
Completely agree about the police response. Absolutely limp wristed. As it turned out they appeared to be waiting for about 8 of their colleagues to arrive. Quite why is beyond me. They're not exactly organised thugs.
richardpayne 8 months ago 2
These leftist whiny babies would never dare protest at an event held by fundamentalist Muslims ;)
SelectiveTweet 8 months ago
Un-imaginative and incomprehensible.
jfabiani 8 months ago
Compare the projected 18k fees with the fees of other Unis. Eton, Harrow, etc.
And when have students NOT protested fees?
EriolTolkien 8 months ago
Compare the projected 18k fees with the fees of other Unis. Eton, Harrow, etc.
EriolTolkien 8 months ago
I was there in the front row. It was a pointless demonstration. I still don't know what their point was. They held up the talk for half an hour and interupted it twice. I'm not sure but I think that the talk may also have been cut short because of it.
RationalConclusion 8 months ago
@RationalConclusion
I was just going to ask: Does anyone know what they were on about?
CrimsonRefractions 8 months ago 2
@Skeptic000001
Or throwing smoke bombs, as they did with AC Grayling!
TunaOfDoubt 8 months ago
They really went about this the wrong way. I totally agree that these raising tutition fees are ridiculous, but Dawkins should not be targeted. With that logic, they should target ALL lecturers teaching at ALL high-charging universities.
TunaOfDoubt 8 months ago
Just a few hot heads whom instead of staying in and watching emmerdale farm thought they'd launch some garbled attack on a public event for a bit of 'street cred' down on campus. Dawkins later stated he give all of his profit from speaking to charity...so...instead of just shouting, how would the protesters respond to that particular point and the fact that rather than taking their protest to the relevant platform it was a lazy attempt to shoot down a high profile victim of a much larger issue?
alzico 8 months ago
@alzico
But *why* where they there?
CrimsonRefractions 8 months ago
While this may not be the proper venue for a protest on that subject, it does strike me as bizarre to charge £18,000 tuition. In my experience, most of the benefit of university education came from the texts and interacting with other students. With a few exceptions (e.g. labs) the buildings and profs were secondary, and I contend are optional for most first and second-year courses. In those years, tuition should not exceed $2000 per year for most students.
rg0057 8 months ago
Boooooooooring
Locateson 8 months ago 2
This is why the left is failing. Protests are all about self indulgence and not about logic or reasoning with people.
yerk3 8 months ago
What in the hell are they chanting? The audio makes it difficult to make out.
JonasSalk 8 months ago
that has to be the coolest thing i've ever seen when they turn around
qtzlctl2012 8 months ago 4
What the crap are they chanting?
qtzlctl2012 8 months ago
From PZ Myers —"The cause for the chaos was peculiar to me: they were protesting AC Grayling's proposed new university, which would have an £18,000 tuition, twice what other universities charge. It seems silly to demonstrate over Richard Dawkins, who has only agreed to lecture there, or AC Grayling, who just wants a good education in the liberal arts for students, or the university itself, when the real cause of the problem is declining political support for a cheap education."
zyxek 8 months ago 36
This has been flagged as spam show
This video missed the interesting bit where a member of the audience got on stage and threatened to remove the protesters himself.
Then police got involved and quickly removed the protesters.
toradrivic 8 months ago
Yes, clearly Richard Dawkins has picked the wrong thing to go have an issue with. I mean, just look at these perfectly reasonable, mature religionists demonstrating how much we should respect them and their imaginary friend.
integralmath 8 months ago
@integralmath They weren't actually theists, just left wing students protesting high education costs in front of an audience who might have sympathized with them had they not acted like a bunch of twats.
Jacksonstreet71 8 months ago 7
@Jacksonstreet71 of all UNIs or just Grayling's? because if it's just his, they don't have to go.
NegativeNick 8 months ago
@NegativeNick The university exists! That's not the problem for people who can't afford access to education, their problem is that the government isn't funding education. When that happens of course more private colleges are going to spring up, blame the fucking government. Don't protest a humanist event which has fuck all to do with your cause! You guys came across as incoherent idiots making noise and annoying people who couldn't fix your problems if they wanted to!
Jacksonstreet71 8 months ago 32
i guess the havent tazer technology in britain yet.
SUPERSTUD6000 8 months ago
This is the weirdest fucking thing i have seen in a while.
The police seemed unsure, and didn't do their job, just kinda stood by and made sure things didn't get too crazy. But they were obviously "causing a disturbance" or whatever the equivalent british law would be.
Then everybody, collectively, suddenly decide to turn their back to the protesters, as if to signal to the protesters that they were not paying attention/care to hear their message.
And worst of all, no Dawkins in the vid~!
sylviabombs15 8 months ago 2