see americans were like we put a man on the moon and made cars with fins and wings xD and then the russians are all like -.- we make the worlds greatest tanks. BEAT THAT!
The United States sold this design to Russia many moons ago, knowing it was second rate and not worth producing themselves. I'ts an effective method to ensure they only have rubbish.
@Mr2pint I can't believe crap like this is thought of... it was the brainchild of mixing the quality of the T-80 and the mass-production rates of the T-72.
@poik12 i'm not trying to start fights, it fact, I'm privy to all such transaction, 98% of all Russian hardware, software come form the United states. All failed designs the US has no need for.
i'm sorry to break the news if you weren't in the know, might pay to look it up
Russia makes good vodka, it's that's any consolation
@loadedClownZ i may be a fan of the leopard2a6 but the challengers 2 gun out classes them both :-/ smooth bore guns just don't have the same kinda range
@madmatt784 I'm thinking idiot but I'm still not sure... You are wrong about everything you said except maybe Russia making money. Sure western tanks are generally better but they all have their strengths and weaknesses. In battle it usually comes down to the crews. Those 3rd world countries you talk about have shitty training and they probably don't maintain their tanks that well... Also praising NATO and the west... WTF man?!?! They do things that suite them not the world...
@Fenrijin Look here @ 1:35 /watch?v=2X4j_2Kgi9o - they say that the Abrams has the same power-to-weight ratio as the Leopard II. And that one (actually an old version) you can see here: /watch?v=BcaEaFXZ2kc
@BadVoodoo100 o amigo estados unidos pior que os mulculmanos fanaticos,eles não mexe conosco BRASILEIROS ,agora EUA ja nos ameaçou varias veses na segunda guerra queriam ate nos invadir.Exploram quanto puderam agora situação mudou,BRASIL RUSSIA sim e aliados agora fora isto sangue sugas de fora.não prescisamos deles,andamos sozinhos,RUSSIA maior potencia do mundo 8 mil orgivas,BRASIL,rico em recursos naturais,juntpos indestrutiveis.
@elberfmmacedo não mexem com o Brasil porque eles não tem o numero suficiente para fazer algo. Mais quando os numeros deles almentarem, ai que o bicho vai pegar que nem tá pegando ná Europa. É tudo uma questão de tempo, tempo que eles tem de sóbra e agente não.
@BadVoodoo100 sim por isso digo a vc\ devemos nos preparar sim,defender nossa nação,ficar na cautela,fabricar bombas atomicas e ficar na nossa ,ai sim mexem conosco,enfiamos bombas atomicas neles pois materia prima temos muita,aquele que não quer guerra tem de se arma pra ela ok valeu amigo.
I've seen an M1A2 Abrams and a T-90 ran on mines, the M1A2 Abrams got immobilized and went into pieces, crew dead, while the T-90 stopped but there is no damage inside and the crew were still alive. T-90 is such a tough monster.
@Howie262 Do the german or russian tanks have a round equal to the silver bullet sabot rounds the M1 has? Because those rounds, the best they have for the abrams, cant penetrate another abrams from the front or the side. M1 is a really complete tank, only big weakness is logistics, they eat fuel.The USA also has over 7000 of these tanks in service. How many russian and german tanks in service actually capable of killing an abrams? Do the math, USA would rape both countrys in a pure tank battle.
@sexyitalian891 First of all bro... im in the Army..... Second You're name "sexyItallian " is Pure fail... Third, the M1 Abrams is was desighned in Germany and the main 120mm smooth bore cannon is a Rhinemetal (German) design....THe leopard 2a6 has the same cannon but with a bigger longer barrel/charge.... it also has a regular turbo diesel.... A leopard 2 tank litterally beats a Abrams in every category... Mobility, Armor, and Cannon... USA has better crew men of course though..
@sexyitalian891 Dont be mad, Historically Americans have never been good at using/Building tanks.... our advantage is a pure numeral advantage... Even Patton said this...
In WWII a Disabled Panzer 5 Tiger is = to 4 sherman tanks..
A fully capable Tiger is = around 10 shermans...
this is not my words either... ask any historian...
maybe you should learn about the M1 abrams and where its built and designed from before your dumbass makes Itallians look bad... uh... too late.
@Howie262 I find your comment funny, this isn't WW2, nor will any of these countrys ever likely fight each other. "Don't be mad." I think you believe yourself way smarter than you actually are. Numbers and logistics are everything. How many leopard 2s does germany have? Not 1/4 as many as the US has abrams. I also love how you brought up my youtube name, and my nationality. You really don't have have any intelligent stuff to say, which is why its funny to read.
@Howie262 So not only in 2 short comments have you proven yourself ignorant and semi racist, but also incapable of taking my information and relating it to something relevant. World war 2 was like 70 years ago dude. Its over with, done. That doesn't matter anymore. They are old tanks only 3rd world countrys use. All these tanks are so closely matched it would simply be a numbers battle, leopard may have an edge on some things, but 1 on 2, leopard loses. 1 on 5, its a massacre.
@Howie262 And also, US and US crewman have actual war experiance, its one thing to train, and its another to actually do it. Not to mention, what major battles have leopard 2 tanks actually been in? In the entire gulf war, not a single m1 abrams crewman died from anything. The leopard 2 is a better tank in some areas on paper sure. But it isn't hard proven like the abrams is. Leopard 2 hasnt done anything really, nothing of note. M1 has been in mass scale tank battles.
@Howie262 You once again did side stepped all my points because you feel like you need to defend yourself. I am saying, America has the most powerful tank brigade. The leopard has a what, 25% better gun at most? Minorly better in other things thats it. 400 leopard 2s, thats all germany has, against over 2000 M1 abrams. We are not comparing the tiger to the sherman here, we are comparing a sherman to a slightly better sherman. You really need to get over yourself.
@Howie262 In any major tank war with any country, I believe the USA would win, hands down. Even against very slightly superior tanks, they would still win because the superior tanks don't have the numbers to back up their advantages. And it is not a huge advantage, it has a decent advantage over only the gun in the abrams, thats it. Everything else is so similar its not worth talking about. USA would win, thats what im getting at. You can say this and that but my argument is sound.
@Howie262 Its logical and makes great sense, yours does not. Your even bringing up forums? I also doubt that the gun of the leopard 2 could achieve anything more than a mobility kill, since modern tanks havnt fought each other ever in the field theres not way of testing exactly how strong their armor really is. I know shots from other M1s with their best ammo, are completly ineffective against the side and front armor. Thats also fact, its not just speculation.
@Howie262 Next time you wanna have a debate with someone, try listening to what they are speaking about and don't bring up useless info. And don't use ad hominem in your "argument" strategy because it just makes you look like a pussy with nothing to say. Try showing a little respect and see how far that gets you, because until then your just a little man with a keyboard.
@sexyitalian891 You're right... how ever, that doesn't change the fact that the Leopard 2 is still the best tank in the world...
Numbers backed up, or not...
Shure America would beat Germany in an all out tank war, thats obvious....
(well for one, Germany spends prolly less than 10% of what we spend on our military)
My argument makes perfect sense.... any expert will tell you, any historian will tell you that the Leopard 2 based on Mobility, Amor and Cannon, is the best.
@Howie262, An M3 Stuart light tank knocked out a Tiger I in close fighting in Tunisia or Sicily in WWII, & a British tanker in a Sherman took on 3 Tiger II's in Normandy & rammed one I believe but the 3 Tiger II,s were actually running from the brave/mad tank crew of the Sherman. 5-10 Shermans would flank a Tiger & in close country (Hedgegrows/bocage, towns, forest, narrow roads & small narrow bridges) have an advantage over the larger & heavier Tigers. Tigers were open terrain AFV's.
@christof139 Thats a subjective argument... i could say the same thing about Michael Whitman and his successes with the Tiger...
Bottom line though... history shows on a Quality vs. Quantity Basis, the Germans are far superior with tanks. Not to mention for the most part the Allies didn't even have Radios in their tanks..
I already stated we have a better volunteer army of course.. apparently you skimmed through what i wrote...
Albert Pike. He was an attorney, Confederate officer, writer and Freemason AND Illuminati. He wrote "Morals and Dogma" by which today's Freemasons still follows and saw a vision in 1871 of 3 World Wars that are necessary to establish a "New World Order". Two wars happened PRECISELY by his words! What is interesting is that he did not predicted them, but he gave a plan for Illuminati and Freemasons. After WW3 population will be decreased to 500 million, Lucifer religion will be established.
There was a message that a WW3 will start in spring 2013, with attack on Iran by NATO, Russia and China will stand against this attack. This will be a normal war until 2016, when USA will move nuclear missiles to Georgia, this act will force russians to launch nukes on USA, China will launch it's nukes on USA too. Instantly USA will launch it's nukes on Russia and China, this will result in 3 billions dead and a lot of radiation everywhere. Anonymous message 5-19-13 Expect Us.
It was the USSR, not Russia in WW2. And, the Nazis were defeated on the Eastern Front, with help from the Western Powers, of course. But it was USA who basically defeated Japan.
If you think that Abrams and his thick armor can stand before the 125 mm gun of the T-90, which shoots guided antitank missiles, you are very mistaken. Abrams did not even have time to drive up to a distance attack.
You also grossly mistaken in the unreliability of the T-90 armor, talking about his small size. Please read about the "active and reactive protection"
Yankee still have not invented the machine of charging. In your american Abrams big sweaty negros fill up the cannon shells =)
@TheDrLester the 125 mm is theoretically capable of peircing the armor of a abrams. the 120 mm is more than capable of piercing the armor of the T90. american tank crews almost always achieve the first shot in an encounter. 5mm extra of size of the gun doesnt make up for um...satellite and uav recon, supply lines, ammo made this side of the year 2000, and proper tank training. also if you think active defense armor can stop a sabot, you are again sadly mistaken.
If you think active armor does not reduce the penetrating power of a sabot round by 30 to 45% (depending on the type/manufacturer) then you are sadly deluded. Go read some relevant information on the subject. The new Ukrainian "Nozh" active armor array can make a T-55 practically immune to M829A2 when hit on protected portions of the tank.
@52111centrumcz what the hell is an M82A2? and the T55 was an upgrade of the T54 which was the successor to the T34, which makes the T55 pitifully outdated by tanks of even the M60 era. even so, ussr member states have never been keen on crew survivability, and i refuse to believe a country which allocates 1.2 billion dollars a year to defense could develop active armor that the us didnt have 40 years ago
The T54 is completely different to a T-34. That's like saying an M-60A1 is an upgrade of an M4.
The US didn't develop active armor because they didn't think to invest in it - just being pure retarded at the Pentagon, like not developing tanks with christie suspension in the 1930s from a US engineer - its called "not invented here" syndrome, and its endemic to retards at the procurement arm of the pentagon.
The M829A2 (you can't even copy correctly) is a US saboted round.
@52111centrumcz succession means next in line dipshit not upgrade of. and id like you to provide a link to your sources. ok, we can argue ww3 who would own who all day long, the truth is look at the godamn operational history of both tanks. the t72 provides a cheap way for dictatorships to terrorize thier civilians, but look at the persian gulf war and try to ignore the fact that the obsolete and incompetently crewed T72s absolutely failed in holding off any sort of us advance
@23HAMSANDWICH We also got to look at some of dictators that were backed and put in by the American power like The Shah of Iran Gen Batista of Cuba and many many more.
@ST4leave they were put in on the assumptions that they would continue representing american interests in the middle east. they didnt. obviously the middle eastern honor code consists of being a complete dick to everyone but a bigger dick than you.
@23HAMSANDWICH What are you talking about they didn’t go with the Islamic regime they stayed true to our will. It was the people that revolted the Shah and put in place the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then Iran was going to unite all Muslim countries under the Islamic regime. That’s when we used Saddam as a Proxy to fight Iran. Now Saddam went against us and threaten to make the US $ useless for purchasing oil then he invaded Kuwait. You can’t force love
@ST4leave im talking about the people in general. arabs have very little redeeming qualities, and im not racist by nature its just that racial profiling does seem to have merit.
eh.. moneys money and the american taxpayer is probably the most powerful force on the planet.
@23HAMSANDWICH Depends. the T-72M and T-72M1 had very poor amounts of armor, used obsolete rounds, and had terrible training. Whereas a T-72B has substantially better armor. Not that it may have mattered against the M829 series.
However, I would say that most countries that operate the T-72 have training that is inferior to US OPFOR training.
But the T-72/80/90 have much better armor than one would think. Especially with Relikt.
The T-72 was built in 1972...M1s started being cranked out around 1983 1984 in numbers. The 120mm variant came out roughly 1989.
Considering the small number of destroyed T-72s which had no IR imaging sights, no air cover and was to all intents and purposes unarmed means ... what exactly? It certainly doesn't mean the M1 is good for anything other than shooting on hard, flat level ground at long range against old tanks with poor optics. Most Iraqi T-72s were from the 1970s.
@52111centrumcz tactics mean more than anything when it comes to tanks. the tiger failed where the panzer II and III succeeded. it means very little. the us isnt stupid. there was a reason the T72s had no air cover. the T72 is a design offering good firepower, but it is not designed to withstand or deflect shots of the rheinmetal smoothbore 120. the Refleks missile would absolutely level any tank it hit however. the us favors not developing a tank accessory until needed.
Almost all the customers who bought russian tank, strip away the russian targeting system and replace it with the western one. i agree, russian 125mm gun are formidable. But it's useless if you can't hit anything with it. T-90 are also sport a thinner armor then the Abrams or any latest western tank which make the T-90 remarkably light. But it make the T-90 less protected then the Abrams.
@lanunselat lol are you kidding me? russia could easily blow america off the world. im an american btw. you are just an ignorant idiot brainwashed by the media
@MrDenfat Abrams 1980s. T-90 early 90s, T-95 a next generation tanks cancelled in favor for T-99. T-90 itself is superior to the Abrams and the T-99 would be worlds best tanks
@AirsoftNewJersey me too. imagine a new russia with the infrastructure and GDP of the united states? then we could finally turn our attention to an new age of space travel. we gotta find faster than light travel, and forgoing our differences would help us at least get one step closer during the next 100 years.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The T90 will lose to ANY NATO tank: Abrams, LeClerc, Challenger II, Leopard II, it doesn't matter. Russian equipment will ALWAYS be inferior to what we have in the civilized world.
@Mikushla why in the WW2 ,russian tank T-34 won against the mighty german panzer Tiger against all the odds? T-90 is not inferior today,i'm not russian and i don't love this country,but always western countries and USA underestimate Russia,don't awake a russian bear because is full of surprises.
@Danezu28 one on one the T34 was toast. soviet designers found the perfect balance between quality design, and ease of production. the tiger was hard to produce, but an all out badass when it came to fighting. the sherman sucked balls, but there were 50000 of them by the time the war ended. the T34 was in the middle. could handle itself well, but there was always another one to take its place if it couldnt.
see americans were like we put a man on the moon and made cars with fins and wings xD and then the russians are all like -.- we make the worlds greatest tanks. BEAT THAT!
madhatten00 1 day ago
@madhatten00 world's greatest tanks? studies show that cold war soviet tanks were not able to penetrate abram's armour
bob18robert 9 hours ago
@madhatten00 I think putting a man on a moon beats building a tank any day.
player276 8 hours ago
Men and their erections.......!
mysterycatarrhman 1 day ago
Guy in car: Holy crap!
Axiom455 1 day ago
Go Russia will eat steel and weapon again like soviet union age
MCCARTNEY1976 1 day ago
like a russian
MrJolle94 1 day ago
The tank at 1:12 is a T 80U :|
Deutschland428 1 day ago
abraham-jew named tank cant be best :D:D:D
DynamicMindLv 2 days ago
The United States sold this design to Russia many moons ago, knowing it was second rate and not worth producing themselves. I'ts an effective method to ensure they only have rubbish.
God bless America
Mr2pint 2 days ago
@Mr2pint I can't believe crap like this is thought of... it was the brainchild of mixing the quality of the T-80 and the mass-production rates of the T-72.
Stop trying to start fights.
poik12 2 days ago
@poik12 i'm not trying to start fights, it fact, I'm privy to all such transaction, 98% of all Russian hardware, software come form the United states. All failed designs the US has no need for.
i'm sorry to break the news if you weren't in the know, might pay to look it up
Russia makes good vodka, it's that's any consolation
Mr2pint 2 days ago
@Mr2pint I prefer ambiguity, please pull the proof you have from your hat.
poik12 2 days ago
@poik12 i'm sorry that's top secret. Trust me, i know my shit!
Mr2pint 2 days ago
@Mr2pint God bless America? hahaha... Stupid dollar slave is talking..
DynamicMindLv 2 days ago
Lame. Nice tanks, but I waited 1:18 to see a tank jump/fly/fall/launch over something. Nothing. * sigh *
KaelNL 3 days ago
@KaelNL
the moment was on the 0.11
sirhalyavshik 2 days ago
The M1 Abrahams and the Leopard 2As are still the best two tanks today.
loadedClownZ 3 days ago
@loadedClownZ i may be a fan of the leopard2a6 but the challengers 2 gun out classes them both :-/ smooth bore guns just don't have the same kinda range
Sn0wman98 3 days ago
The US should take a tip from Russia...
Lugiafan0798 3 days ago
Soon some third world tank crew will die when a nato tank round rips threw it.
Russians tanks die nicely on the battlefeild in front of the superior western forces.
madmatt784 3 days ago
@madmatt784 Kick your ass any day Cyka
Fallout3Tec 3 days ago
@madmatt784 not sure if troll or idiot -.-
AndrejIzAwesome 3 days ago
@AndrejIzAwesome Tell Anal Andrew. Does Russia make alot of money producing these death traps?
Or do they like putting their young men in harms way...
In the west we see these amazing tanks on cable or the internet..
Then we see them get blasted off the face of the earth every five years or so.
What is it?
Maybe you should Join Nato and be safe under the protection of the free world.
madmatt784 3 days ago
@madmatt784 NOONE FUCKS WITH RUSSIA!!
omiblingbling 3 days ago
@madmatt784 I'm thinking idiot but I'm still not sure... You are wrong about everything you said except maybe Russia making money. Sure western tanks are generally better but they all have their strengths and weaknesses. In battle it usually comes down to the crews. Those 3rd world countries you talk about have shitty training and they probably don't maintain their tanks that well... Also praising NATO and the west... WTF man?!?! They do things that suite them not the world...
AndrejIzAwesome 3 days ago
That's why Russians kick ass.
Lugiafan0798 4 days ago
@Lugiafan0798 Russia licks ass...
madmatt784 3 days ago
@madmatt784 Fuck you ass hole, Cyka
Fallout3Tec 3 days ago
@madmatt784 SAY THAT TO FPSRUSSIA HE'D KICK UR ASS
Lugiafan0798 3 days ago
Russia please buy our tanks
serge00storms 4 days ago
wtf no BF3 comments?
doddyrichgin 4 days ago
How is this something to be proud of? They are just huge wastes of money. Both their intent and their physical state.
yourvidisbad101 5 days ago
@yourvidisbad101 Says the guy living in the country that spends the most money in the fucking world on its military
Antifaith29 4 days ago
@Antifaith29 Well, unlike you, I do not approve of my military's actions.
yourvidisbad101 3 days ago
@yourvidisbad101 Its intent is ok. it is to be an economic and lethal competition to western tanks.
Whats wrong with marketing?
Anyways,its a nice thing,too bad I cant have one...
Vosbraka 3 days ago
guy at 1:00 was like....what the F......
DanChoiThon 5 days ago
did this in bf3 today. hahaha...
iProfessionaIRussian 6 days ago
ссыкотно?
kuchinalexandr 6 days ago
so this is where my tax dollars go
AKaudio 6 days ago
All modern battle tanks can do this.
derast 1 week ago
@derast AYFKM ? Show me how abrahams will jump ? :D
Fenrijin 1 week ago
@Fenrijin Look here @ 1:35 /watch?v=2X4j_2Kgi9o - they say that the Abrams has the same power-to-weight ratio as the Leopard II. And that one (actually an old version) you can see here: /watch?v=BcaEaFXZ2kc
I think that should work. Cheers!
derast 1 week ago
sick tank! Watch out Abrams.
BadVoodoo100 1 week ago
0:23 And here we have the luxury model equipped with: Heated seats, Multiple cup holders, And a Sunroof for the kids
Only In Russia
Stryker589 1 week ago
That flying shot at the beggining was fucking orgasmic. Favorited.
56KbModem 1 week ago
Seriously its like every ones shitting on America it's Europe u should shit on Im Dutch btw.
guitaristglenn 1 week ago
@guitaristglenn what are you talking about? Why Europe?
BadVoodoo100 1 week ago
Comment removed
Jpayne8921 1 week ago
RUSSIA melhor do mundo salvação da humanidade cotra império norte americano,salve RUSSIA salve salve BRASIL RUSSIA.
elberfmmacedo 1 week ago
@elberfmmacedo pra que isso? Que tal Brasil, Russia, e EUA aliados contra os muculmanos fanáticos que querem matar todos nós?
BadVoodoo100 1 week ago
@BadVoodoo100 o amigo estados unidos pior que os mulculmanos fanaticos,eles não mexe conosco BRASILEIROS ,agora EUA ja nos ameaçou varias veses na segunda guerra queriam ate nos invadir.Exploram quanto puderam agora situação mudou,BRASIL RUSSIA sim e aliados agora fora isto sangue sugas de fora.não prescisamos deles,andamos sozinhos,RUSSIA maior potencia do mundo 8 mil orgivas,BRASIL,rico em recursos naturais,juntpos indestrutiveis.
elberfmmacedo 1 week ago
@elberfmmacedo não mexem com o Brasil porque eles não tem o numero suficiente para fazer algo. Mais quando os numeros deles almentarem, ai que o bicho vai pegar que nem tá pegando ná Europa. É tudo uma questão de tempo, tempo que eles tem de sóbra e agente não.
BadVoodoo100 1 week ago
@BadVoodoo100 sim por isso digo a vc\ devemos nos preparar sim,defender nossa nação,ficar na cautela,fabricar bombas atomicas e ficar na nossa ,ai sim mexem conosco,enfiamos bombas atomicas neles pois materia prima temos muita,aquele que não quer guerra tem de se arma pra ela ok valeu amigo.
elberfmmacedo 6 days ago
Meanwhile in Russia...
Agentkip1 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've seen an M1A2 Abrams and a T-90 ran on mines, the M1A2 Abrams got immobilized and went into pieces, crew dead, while the T-90 stopped but there is no damage inside and the crew were still alive. T-90 is such a tough monster.
sergeikozin47 1 week ago
russia inspirition song i feel stronger alreaady :P
also that is the coolest job ever
unfalpulse 1 week ago
@garystrick85 No, idiot. People on the internet know how to spell.
Maxbtwshow 1 week ago
i've seen an m1a2 and a t90 which ran on mines, m1a2 got immobilized, crew alive, while t90 went to pieces...
MrOldCrow 1 week ago
Russian T-90 "0" USAF A-10 "1" Nuff said.
Froggy19510 1 week ago
reminds me of the MW2 - Black Ops - MW3 quickscoping
HotTop202 1 week ago
Make no mistake... Russia has ALWAYS been ahead of the allies in tanks.. Not to mention air power and radar..
source1zero 1 week ago
ww3 here we come.
SamuelJCir 1 week ago
German Tanks, Russian Tanks > American tanks
Howie262 1 week ago
@Howie262
so these will kill more people in Syria?
taledarkside 1 week ago
@taledarkside they will kill terrorists in syria
MrDavidDux 1 week ago
@MrDavidDux
they will just kill innocent people. Just like Russia today claims the US does.
taledarkside 1 week ago
@Howie262 Do the german or russian tanks have a round equal to the silver bullet sabot rounds the M1 has? Because those rounds, the best they have for the abrams, cant penetrate another abrams from the front or the side. M1 is a really complete tank, only big weakness is logistics, they eat fuel.The USA also has over 7000 of these tanks in service. How many russian and german tanks in service actually capable of killing an abrams? Do the math, USA would rape both countrys in a pure tank battle.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@sexyitalian891 First of all bro... im in the Army..... Second You're name "sexyItallian " is Pure fail... Third, the M1 Abrams is was desighned in Germany and the main 120mm smooth bore cannon is a Rhinemetal (German) design....THe leopard 2a6 has the same cannon but with a bigger longer barrel/charge.... it also has a regular turbo diesel.... A leopard 2 tank litterally beats a Abrams in every category... Mobility, Armor, and Cannon... USA has better crew men of course though..
Howie262 1 week ago
@sexyitalian891 Dont be mad, Historically Americans have never been good at using/Building tanks.... our advantage is a pure numeral advantage... Even Patton said this...
In WWII a Disabled Panzer 5 Tiger is = to 4 sherman tanks..
A fully capable Tiger is = around 10 shermans...
this is not my words either... ask any historian...
maybe you should learn about the M1 abrams and where its built and designed from before your dumbass makes Itallians look bad... uh... too late.
Howie262 1 week ago
@Howie262 I find your comment funny, this isn't WW2, nor will any of these countrys ever likely fight each other. "Don't be mad." I think you believe yourself way smarter than you actually are. Numbers and logistics are everything. How many leopard 2s does germany have? Not 1/4 as many as the US has abrams. I also love how you brought up my youtube name, and my nationality. You really don't have have any intelligent stuff to say, which is why its funny to read.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@Howie262 So not only in 2 short comments have you proven yourself ignorant and semi racist, but also incapable of taking my information and relating it to something relevant. World war 2 was like 70 years ago dude. Its over with, done. That doesn't matter anymore. They are old tanks only 3rd world countrys use. All these tanks are so closely matched it would simply be a numbers battle, leopard may have an edge on some things, but 1 on 2, leopard loses. 1 on 5, its a massacre.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@Howie262 And also, US and US crewman have actual war experiance, its one thing to train, and its another to actually do it. Not to mention, what major battles have leopard 2 tanks actually been in? In the entire gulf war, not a single m1 abrams crewman died from anything. The leopard 2 is a better tank in some areas on paper sure. But it isn't hard proven like the abrams is. Leopard 2 hasnt done anything really, nothing of note. M1 has been in mass scale tank battles.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@sexyitalian891 Clearly i already stated that We have a better Active duty volunteer army...
Are you trying to prove a German built tank is better then a German built tank?
ok go right a head lol.
Im in the army... Our Tankers and infantry train in close coordination with the Germans in Germany.
Bottom line, is on a physical mechanical basis, the leopard 2 is clearly the best tank in the world...
look at any forum.
US tankers in Leopard 2's would be the best of course..
Howie262 1 week ago
@Howie262 You once again did side stepped all my points because you feel like you need to defend yourself. I am saying, America has the most powerful tank brigade. The leopard has a what, 25% better gun at most? Minorly better in other things thats it. 400 leopard 2s, thats all germany has, against over 2000 M1 abrams. We are not comparing the tiger to the sherman here, we are comparing a sherman to a slightly better sherman. You really need to get over yourself.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@Howie262 In any major tank war with any country, I believe the USA would win, hands down. Even against very slightly superior tanks, they would still win because the superior tanks don't have the numbers to back up their advantages. And it is not a huge advantage, it has a decent advantage over only the gun in the abrams, thats it. Everything else is so similar its not worth talking about. USA would win, thats what im getting at. You can say this and that but my argument is sound.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@Howie262 Its logical and makes great sense, yours does not. Your even bringing up forums? I also doubt that the gun of the leopard 2 could achieve anything more than a mobility kill, since modern tanks havnt fought each other ever in the field theres not way of testing exactly how strong their armor really is. I know shots from other M1s with their best ammo, are completly ineffective against the side and front armor. Thats also fact, its not just speculation.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@Howie262 Next time you wanna have a debate with someone, try listening to what they are speaking about and don't bring up useless info. And don't use ad hominem in your "argument" strategy because it just makes you look like a pussy with nothing to say. Try showing a little respect and see how far that gets you, because until then your just a little man with a keyboard.
sexyitalian891 1 week ago
@sexyitalian891 You're right... how ever, that doesn't change the fact that the Leopard 2 is still the best tank in the world...
Numbers backed up, or not...
Shure America would beat Germany in an all out tank war, thats obvious....
(well for one, Germany spends prolly less than 10% of what we spend on our military)
My argument makes perfect sense.... any expert will tell you, any historian will tell you that the Leopard 2 based on Mobility, Amor and Cannon, is the best.
Howie262 6 days ago
@Howie262, An M3 Stuart light tank knocked out a Tiger I in close fighting in Tunisia or Sicily in WWII, & a British tanker in a Sherman took on 3 Tiger II's in Normandy & rammed one I believe but the 3 Tiger II,s were actually running from the brave/mad tank crew of the Sherman. 5-10 Shermans would flank a Tiger & in close country (Hedgegrows/bocage, towns, forest, narrow roads & small narrow bridges) have an advantage over the larger & heavier Tigers. Tigers were open terrain AFV's.
christof139 1 week ago
@christof139 Thats a subjective argument... i could say the same thing about Michael Whitman and his successes with the Tiger...
Bottom line though... history shows on a Quality vs. Quantity Basis, the Germans are far superior with tanks. Not to mention for the most part the Allies didn't even have Radios in their tanks..
I already stated we have a better volunteer army of course.. apparently you skimmed through what i wrote...
I would know, im in the Army...
Howie262 1 week ago
EXTERMINATE!!!
inkmagnet 1 week ago
Holy shit they work!!
CaptinAwesome15 1 week ago
Meanwhile at Greenpeace headquarter.
TheCameltotem 1 week ago
in soviet russia, tanks drives you!
torcidaSTobrec 1 week ago
stupid Americans and Europeans, Russia kick ass you are
Markscheider77 1 week ago
@Markscheider77 Russian are (for a part) europeans dumbass....
whitemen02 1 week ago
you have not seen the new Russian tanks T-99, they will be ready by 2013.
SuperMosara 1 week ago
in soviet russia tanks drove you
vonestoner 1 week ago
0:09 wow how smart!!! You just wasted one round dumbass
oporim 1 week ago
T-90s are the new style now for Russia? T-72s were the old ones?
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 week ago
@DarkPrinceNH5570but t-90s cost 4.2 million so its very expensive t-72
TATARSTAN59500 1 week ago
@DarkPrinceNH5570 and t-90ms its just revolution
with new turret new engine new relikt armor transmission pilot post and sateelit comunication system
TATARSTAN59500 1 week ago
No way... T-90s are almost the same as the Leopard IIs in something.
Russia made this tank? Russia and Germany might as well come together as a whole.
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 week ago
then they break down
xxuncexx 1 week ago
The guy at 1:00, holy fuck, ok ill pay my taxes..
bluebanana8ify 1 week ago 2
Who needs Monster Trucks?
IVANGROZNEY 1 week ago
ok so where is this flying tank?
chezzylee 1 week ago
I need one of these for school
SenhorPatriota 2 weeks ago
1:09 that guy with that whit t-shirt tthinks OMG i am scruwed
NeuroticCube94 2 weeks ago
God bless RUSSIA
knightwar3 2 weeks ago
cheap
01101111omg 2 weeks ago
SERBIA MUST HAVE THOSE !!!
HybodusStudios 2 weeks ago
Background Music 00:55 : Queen - We Are The Champions (Russian Version) LOL!?
TheSuperComments 2 weeks ago
@TheSuperComments No, generally it is a hymn in rock processing
Mithreech 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheSuperComments 2 weeks ago
:56 was a glorious moment.
AuRevoirTune 2 weeks ago
Cheap
01101111omg 2 weeks ago
Albert Pike. He was an attorney, Confederate officer, writer and Freemason AND Illuminati. He wrote "Morals and Dogma" by which today's Freemasons still follows and saw a vision in 1871 of 3 World Wars that are necessary to establish a "New World Order". Two wars happened PRECISELY by his words! What is interesting is that he did not predicted them, but he gave a plan for Illuminati and Freemasons. After WW3 population will be decreased to 500 million, Lucifer religion will be established.
sedjetra 2 weeks ago
There was a message that a WW3 will start in spring 2013, with attack on Iran by NATO, Russia and China will stand against this attack. This will be a normal war until 2016, when USA will move nuclear missiles to Georgia, this act will force russians to launch nukes on USA, China will launch it's nukes on USA too. Instantly USA will launch it's nukes on Russia and China, this will result in 3 billions dead and a lot of radiation everywhere. Anonymous message 5-19-13 Expect Us.
sedjetra 2 weeks ago
@sedjetra What a retarded load of crap.
mryellow123 1 week ago
@mryellow123 just wait and see.
sedjetra 1 week ago
دبابة جيدة ولكن الابرامز افضل m1 a1 تتعدى امكانياتها بكثير
elruby52 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@radostsguy Learn history!!! Compare scales of battles, Americans only played war.
GluhoiStarik 2 weeks ago
why do they output all that fog? lol. aren't they powered by jet engines?
frizstyler 2 weeks ago
It was the USSR, not Russia in WW2. And, the Nazis were defeated on the Eastern Front, with help from the Western Powers, of course. But it was USA who basically defeated Japan.
radostsguy1 2 weeks ago
@radostsguy1 Learn history!!! Compare scales of battles, Americans only played war.
GluhoiStarik 2 weeks ago
Well.... it would shoot the shit out of my Corolla!!!
mrbishi1000 2 weeks ago
what a happy family T-90S & T-80U & T-90A very nice
MetalGearArmA 2 weeks ago
that projectile from 0:10 just hit the village...
mikenmbr1 2 weeks ago
If you think that Abrams and his thick armor can stand before the 125 mm gun of the T-90, which shoots guided antitank missiles, you are very mistaken. Abrams did not even have time to drive up to a distance attack.
You also grossly mistaken in the unreliability of the T-90 armor, talking about his small size. Please read about the "active and reactive protection"
Yankee still have not invented the machine of charging. In your american Abrams big sweaty negros fill up the cannon shells =)
TheDrLester 2 weeks ago
@TheDrLester the 125 mm is theoretically capable of peircing the armor of a abrams. the 120 mm is more than capable of piercing the armor of the T90. american tank crews almost always achieve the first shot in an encounter. 5mm extra of size of the gun doesnt make up for um...satellite and uav recon, supply lines, ammo made this side of the year 2000, and proper tank training. also if you think active defense armor can stop a sabot, you are again sadly mistaken.
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH
If you think active armor does not reduce the penetrating power of a sabot round by 30 to 45% (depending on the type/manufacturer) then you are sadly deluded. Go read some relevant information on the subject. The new Ukrainian "Nozh" active armor array can make a T-55 practically immune to M829A2 when hit on protected portions of the tank.
52111centrumcz 2 weeks ago
@52111centrumcz what the hell is an M82A2? and the T55 was an upgrade of the T54 which was the successor to the T34, which makes the T55 pitifully outdated by tanks of even the M60 era. even so, ussr member states have never been keen on crew survivability, and i refuse to believe a country which allocates 1.2 billion dollars a year to defense could develop active armor that the us didnt have 40 years ago
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH
The T54 is completely different to a T-34. That's like saying an M-60A1 is an upgrade of an M4.
The US didn't develop active armor because they didn't think to invest in it - just being pure retarded at the Pentagon, like not developing tanks with christie suspension in the 1930s from a US engineer - its called "not invented here" syndrome, and its endemic to retards at the procurement arm of the pentagon.
The M829A2 (you can't even copy correctly) is a US saboted round.
52111centrumcz 2 weeks ago
@52111centrumcz succession means next in line dipshit not upgrade of. and id like you to provide a link to your sources. ok, we can argue ww3 who would own who all day long, the truth is look at the godamn operational history of both tanks. the t72 provides a cheap way for dictatorships to terrorize thier civilians, but look at the persian gulf war and try to ignore the fact that the obsolete and incompetently crewed T72s absolutely failed in holding off any sort of us advance
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH We also got to look at some of dictators that were backed and put in by the American power like The Shah of Iran Gen Batista of Cuba and many many more.
ST4leave 2 weeks ago
@ST4leave they were put in on the assumptions that they would continue representing american interests in the middle east. they didnt. obviously the middle eastern honor code consists of being a complete dick to everyone but a bigger dick than you.
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH What are you talking about they didn’t go with the Islamic regime they stayed true to our will. It was the people that revolted the Shah and put in place the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then Iran was going to unite all Muslim countries under the Islamic regime. That’s when we used Saddam as a Proxy to fight Iran. Now Saddam went against us and threaten to make the US $ useless for purchasing oil then he invaded Kuwait. You can’t force love
ST4leave 2 weeks ago
@ST4leave im talking about the people in general. arabs have very little redeeming qualities, and im not racist by nature its just that racial profiling does seem to have merit.
eh.. moneys money and the american taxpayer is probably the most powerful force on the planet.
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH Depends. the T-72M and T-72M1 had very poor amounts of armor, used obsolete rounds, and had terrible training. Whereas a T-72B has substantially better armor. Not that it may have mattered against the M829 series.
However, I would say that most countries that operate the T-72 have training that is inferior to US OPFOR training.
But the T-72/80/90 have much better armor than one would think. Especially with Relikt.
franknbeans4761 2 weeks ago
@23HAMSANDWICH
The T-72 was built in 1972...M1s started being cranked out around 1983 1984 in numbers. The 120mm variant came out roughly 1989.
Considering the small number of destroyed T-72s which had no IR imaging sights, no air cover and was to all intents and purposes unarmed means ... what exactly? It certainly doesn't mean the M1 is good for anything other than shooting on hard, flat level ground at long range against old tanks with poor optics. Most Iraqi T-72s were from the 1970s.
52111centrumcz 2 weeks ago
@52111centrumcz tactics mean more than anything when it comes to tanks. the tiger failed where the panzer II and III succeeded. it means very little. the us isnt stupid. there was a reason the T72s had no air cover. the T72 is a design offering good firepower, but it is not designed to withstand or deflect shots of the rheinmetal smoothbore 120. the Refleks missile would absolutely level any tank it hit however. the us favors not developing a tank accessory until needed.
23HAMSANDWICH 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheDrLester 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheDrLester 2 weeks ago
tank 1 everything else 0
BlackGoldEstates 2 weeks ago
tankcross
cgDominion 2 weeks ago
take a look at this hude gun!
realomon 2 weeks ago
Tanks for uploading.
loumberjack1982 2 weeks ago
THIS IS THE GREATEST THING EVER.
WilliamBrown93 3 weeks ago
Almost all the customers who bought russian tank, strip away the russian targeting system and replace it with the western one. i agree, russian 125mm gun are formidable. But it's useless if you can't hit anything with it. T-90 are also sport a thinner armor then the Abrams or any latest western tank which make the T-90 remarkably light. But it make the T-90 less protected then the Abrams.
lanunselat 3 weeks ago
@lanunselat
Look up what volumetric armor efficiency means, and then compare the two tank sizes. From the frontal aspect both tanks have comparable armor.
52111centrumcz 3 weeks ago
AMERICAN FUCK!!!!!!RUSSIAN FOREVER!!!!!РУССКИЕ ВПЕРЁД!!!!!!
Chelovegin 3 weeks ago
@Chelovegin You don't have to say it out loud. we already know that AMERICAN FUCK RUSSIA FOREVER.
lanunselat 3 weeks ago
@lanunselat lol are you kidding me? russia could easily blow america off the world. im an american btw. you are just an ignorant idiot brainwashed by the media
michiman57 3 weeks ago
1:10
Spectator: What happens now?
Soldier: Firepower demonstration.
Spectator: But those guns are pointing right at us.
Soldier: Da.
Spectator: Oh, chyort.
bamarine247 3 weeks ago
0:37 The driver must be wet to the bone XD
smoothMousePad 3 weeks ago
Pause at 1:14. Can you imagine how fucking loud the gun must be for that guy in the front right under the turret.
Tomatoesaretasty 3 weeks ago
Model T-100 will enter the vertical wall ;3
GisPoru 3 weeks ago
The tank obviously has great amortization to perform that jump. That's the pressure of 60 tons that needs to be amplified!
LightningHexagon 3 weeks ago
This is the kind of shit I do on battlefield this shit is legit!!
MrSilverfish12 3 weeks ago
-60c Soviet Russia people lick frozen vodka.
xxlzaka 3 weeks ago
i think the crewmen of this T90 have been playing the PS2 GTAs
VenatorAcclamator 3 weeks ago
M1 Abrams is the beast
the T 90 is a kids toy
almaajood 4 weeks ago
@almaajood Have you seen the T-95? If not, do not say anything about the Abrams
MrDenfat 3 weeks ago
@MrDenfat Abrams 1980s. T-90 early 90s, T-95 a next generation tanks cancelled in favor for T-99. T-90 itself is superior to the Abrams and the T-99 would be worlds best tanks
SMGJohn 3 weeks ago
@MrDenfat Common are you serious. The russian dumb generals refused it, they want to keep this shit as the major tanks for the Russian army
almaajood 3 weeks ago
Carbon box.
89UncleSam 4 weeks ago 2
0:09 Quickscope ^^
GFCDelta 1 month ago
You could get them all at 1:06 with Squad Explosives.
HomocidicalBear 1 month ago
Do a rocket jump!
BornAgainEngineer 1 month ago
i love the way it bounces lol
nuk3p0w3rd 1 month ago
In U.S., the tanks can be seen only in Hollywood movies.
KNOWSCORE 1 month ago
Why don't the Russians and Americans team up against China and Korea. That'd be awesome.
Marks1157 1 month ago
@Marks1157
what a pointless comment.
war is not "awesome"....
drzdeano 4 weeks ago
@drzdeano I didn't say war is awesome. I said the alliance of these two nations would be epic.
Marks1157 3 weeks ago
I hope one day the US and Russia will be strong allies.
AirsoftNewJersey 1 month ago
@AirsoftNewJersey me too. imagine a new russia with the infrastructure and GDP of the united states? then we could finally turn our attention to an new age of space travel. we gotta find faster than light travel, and forgoing our differences would help us at least get one step closer during the next 100 years.
23HAMSANDWICH 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The T90 will lose to ANY NATO tank: Abrams, LeClerc, Challenger II, Leopard II, it doesn't matter. Russian equipment will ALWAYS be inferior to what we have in the civilized world.
Mikushla 1 month ago
@Mikushla why in the WW2 ,russian tank T-34 won against the mighty german panzer Tiger against all the odds? T-90 is not inferior today,i'm not russian and i don't love this country,but always western countries and USA underestimate Russia,don't awake a russian bear because is full of surprises.
Danezu28 1 month ago
@Danezu28 one on one the T34 was toast. soviet designers found the perfect balance between quality design, and ease of production. the tiger was hard to produce, but an all out badass when it came to fighting. the sherman sucked balls, but there were 50000 of them by the time the war ended. the T34 was in the middle. could handle itself well, but there was always another one to take its place if it couldnt.
23HAMSANDWICH 1 month ago