"YouTube user Scientolulz (4 minutes ago) has been banned from further participation in this conversation as a result of having clearly nothing of value to lose or add.
Jessica Ann Chandler, MSW "
Banned Scientolulz too? You are disgarding peoples right to free speech, smells like 'Nancy Grace' to me.
I'm glad you finally figured out my day job. Nope, sorry. This will not wash. Freedom of speech is not the freedom to do whatever you wish, online or off. Both are actionable, though the irl portion far more so. You've not been blocked. What's your beef?
If they want to toe the TOS (revised by me) line, then like you they're welcome to speech in MY environment. If not then they have the whole rest of YouTube to be "free" in.
I think you have not blocked me because I revealed your actions regarding skepptiksowat's immediate blocking after 25 seconds on your site. on skeptiks video I questioned whether you would block me too. You immediatly reinstated skepptiksowat back on your channel, and have allowed me to continue our dialogue. My advice, don't cherry pick your comments, let the people speak.
No, actually I didn't block you because you SAID moronymous was a social worker who wanted to debate me then ran off like a little bitch when I said, "Sounds like a good idea, set it up."
Yet all you seem able to do is fuck up comments sections. One more time and you get some "quiet time" too.
I didn't run, I assumed you would look up a moronymous video or comment directly on skepptiksowat's video. I didn't realize you needed my help to set up this debate. Please don't block me, I am not a Scientologist nor am I a member of Anonymous (never even been to a protest). This is good therapy for me and my concern for you is sincere. If I am blocked I will be compelled to comment to you on skepptiksowat's video where you cannot pick and choose who you want to have a voice. I'll behave:)
Your curiosity is your own problem, but you're fun to type to while I hold on the phone to talk to my lawyer. Please, feel free to comment anywhere you like and in any way, just not here. The topic is NOT my mental health and you would do better to look to your own before worrying about mine.
If you wish more digression, keep it to private messages.
Jessica, I really feel I need to say that you can't take all this too seriously, I don't want you too get too wound up over this, it might really upset you and I do care about your health. Take it easy and try to have fun with it ok? There are people who care out there. I really mean this...enjoy the attention and carry on, LOL
I am having my lulz, not to worry ;) check your email. I'm up to the challenge anytime! I'm anticipating the issue of "moar dox" anytime, and willing to stand by what I say with my name and career. I'd welcome any other person who was similarly willing.
Sometimes the ethical solutions are not the easiest. Enjoy your lulz. Nite.
I believe you did not understand my comment on skepptiksowat's video where I said the possibility of a debate was not with skepptiksowat, but with moronymous, the true mastermind.
YouTube user Scientolulz (4 minutes ago) has been banned from further participation in this conversation as a result of having clearly nothing of value to lose or add.
After 15 months of participating and watching nearly every related video which has come to my attention here (so many that my "popularity" on the web in no way surpasses him), and many, many recently exchanged emails, that reality and how extreme his views were hit home with me.
There was a time to shout "salt the Earth." There is now a time to remember Martin Luther and to discuss what does it mean to be a Church (of Scientology or any other)?
well, CD sees CoS on the same level as the Nazis, I don't think they're far off either-
Difference is, CD wants to go WWII on them, and I just wanna take Hitler down, see them rip out the whole system and start anew- because their current system now would only repeat the process.
I do NOT know all the answers, but I know that I don't want to go to "war." We've already been there 15 months, and I'm beginning to feel like I'm a soldier in Iraq held over for another tour of duty for the 3rd time because Bush swore there'd be WMD's.
From a social work perspective, even Hitler had strengths. Failing to be objective has been what has gotten me here on the other side of the fence, screaming for strategy of re-creation not destruction.
It's not about who posted them. In fact it is about what seems to be an active conspiracy to push views of extremism. "This sort of thing," simply isn't acceptable use of the web space provided and when reduced to reality is nothing more than repetition in advance of a propaganda driven sociopolitical agenda that has devolved into acts of online conspiracy leading to targeted hate speech.
As such, the conspiracy has been targeted and not the individuals who cannot lead us out of this mess.
Apply that last sentence to EVERYBODY and partyv&n them all if shit doesn't moderate. From where I sit, Scientology is thinking really hard about facts on the ground and 'anonymous' is using its standard "head up ass" thinking it's the new and improved "OstrichTech."
It didn't and won't work for Scientology, and it won't work for 'anonymous.' Welcome to the 21st century where professionals as well as idiot children actually do run around on the net and have something fucking relevant to say. ;)
Try again. I'm not following your logic. A less cryptic answer which tell who in particular you speak to would help. Alas YouTube comments are both limiting and a challenge.
You know which of who is what?
Careful now. Either IMHO or support yourself with demonstrable facts. Otherwise the Editorial "bitch" will have to assume none of it was worth reading in the first place, and to remove you from history and hers.
I think skepptiksowat was referring to your comment 4 days ago when you said, and I quote, "where professionals as well as idiot children actually do run around on the net and have something fucking relevant to say".
Ah. That would have made more sense, and yes I would be glad to "debate" this behavior at length. I already have in monologue. I'm ready to stand for my actions and sign my name to the record, no matter how distasteful. Is skeppticksoowat?
I am absolutely willing to have a discussion in public with a fellow MSW. I do not say my point is the only point. I say that my videos are for a point. I have seen skepp's video and stand by my history in all venues on all sides.
I sign my name for a reason and with a credential for another. If you want justification, how about "full disclosure and personal responsibility" both online and off?
When skepp come's out of the name closet, I'll worry about this. Til then, no.
What I do not get is why 'anonymous' bitches and moans about not getting attention from academia, then blocks academics from their website.
Colleagues have gone to the site and directly to the "Thunderdome," home of planning for irl acts of terrorism, and get banned for "suspicious behavior."
Since when was research by an individual in pursuit of truth, considered "suspicious behavior?"
Maybe go ask the gai I added to my next video. His home page is CANCER, as is his views re. 1st Amendment.
Unless you have more recent info than I do... what is it you think Germany did? And yes, my "beef" resulted in an extended hospital stay and court mandated treatment for a diagnosis I do not and did not have going into this mess.
OMG here they are again! I will find out more... this is too fun! You go girls!
jstnosi 2 years ago 3
"YouTube user Scientolulz (4 minutes ago) has been banned from further participation in this conversation as a result of having clearly nothing of value to lose or add.
Jessica Ann Chandler, MSW "
Banned Scientolulz too? You are disgarding peoples right to free speech, smells like 'Nancy Grace' to me.
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago 4
I'm glad you finally figured out my day job. Nope, sorry. This will not wash. Freedom of speech is not the freedom to do whatever you wish, online or off. Both are actionable, though the irl portion far more so. You've not been blocked. What's your beef?
If they want to toe the TOS (revised by me) line, then like you they're welcome to speech in MY environment. If not then they have the whole rest of YouTube to be "free" in.
Argument no mas,
Try again.
JAC, MSW
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
I think you have not blocked me because I revealed your actions regarding skepptiksowat's immediate blocking after 25 seconds on your site. on skeptiks video I questioned whether you would block me too. You immediatly reinstated skepptiksowat back on your channel, and have allowed me to continue our dialogue. My advice, don't cherry pick your comments, let the people speak.
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago
No, actually I didn't block you because you SAID moronymous was a social worker who wanted to debate me then ran off like a little bitch when I said, "Sounds like a good idea, set it up."
Yet all you seem able to do is fuck up comments sections. One more time and you get some "quiet time" too.
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
I didn't run, I assumed you would look up a moronymous video or comment directly on skepptiksowat's video. I didn't realize you needed my help to set up this debate. Please don't block me, I am not a Scientologist nor am I a member of Anonymous (never even been to a protest). This is good therapy for me and my concern for you is sincere. If I am blocked I will be compelled to comment to you on skepptiksowat's video where you cannot pick and choose who you want to have a voice. I'll behave:)
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago
Your curiosity is your own problem, but you're fun to type to while I hold on the phone to talk to my lawyer. Please, feel free to comment anywhere you like and in any way, just not here. The topic is NOT my mental health and you would do better to look to your own before worrying about mine.
If you wish more digression, keep it to private messages.
Jessica Ann Chandler
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
Jessica, I really feel I need to say that you can't take all this too seriously, I don't want you too get too wound up over this, it might really upset you and I do care about your health. Take it easy and try to have fun with it ok? There are people who care out there. I really mean this...enjoy the attention and carry on, LOL
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago 2
I am having my lulz, not to worry ;) check your email. I'm up to the challenge anytime! I'm anticipating the issue of "moar dox" anytime, and willing to stand by what I say with my name and career. I'd welcome any other person who was similarly willing.
Sometimes the ethical solutions are not the easiest. Enjoy your lulz. Nite.
JC
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
I believe you did not understand my comment on skepptiksowat's video where I said the possibility of a debate was not with skepptiksowat, but with moronymous, the true mastermind.
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago
YouTube user Scientolulz (4 minutes ago) has been banned from further participation in this conversation as a result of having clearly nothing of value to lose or add.
Jessica Ann Chandler, MSW
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
im going to have to call photoshop. at the bottom of one of the pm's you claim is from CD, its signed JC.
laladiel 2 years ago 3
That one was FROM me TOO CD. You missed the shift in points of view.
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
mirroring does happen, you know-
how are you so certain CD was the one who repopped the videos?and CD has not been secretive about his stance on CoS-
he sees them as a true threat and doesn't think they're capable of reform do to the tech being so screwed.
You can hear him talk about his views on his earlier videos.
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 2
After 15 months of participating and watching nearly every related video which has come to my attention here (so many that my "popularity" on the web in no way surpasses him), and many, many recently exchanged emails, that reality and how extreme his views were hit home with me.
There was a time to shout "salt the Earth." There is now a time to remember Martin Luther and to discuss what does it mean to be a Church (of Scientology or any other)?
What common thread means "religious hate speech?"
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
well, CD sees CoS on the same level as the Nazis, I don't think they're far off either-
Difference is, CD wants to go WWII on them, and I just wanna take Hitler down, see them rip out the whole system and start anew- because their current system now would only repeat the process.
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 5
I do NOT know all the answers, but I know that I don't want to go to "war." We've already been there 15 months, and I'm beginning to feel like I'm a soldier in Iraq held over for another tour of duty for the 3rd time because Bush swore there'd be WMD's.
From a social work perspective, even Hitler had strengths. Failing to be objective has been what has gotten me here on the other side of the fence, screaming for strategy of re-creation not destruction.
We did exposure. Nao solutions please.
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
It's not about who posted them. In fact it is about what seems to be an active conspiracy to push views of extremism. "This sort of thing," simply isn't acceptable use of the web space provided and when reduced to reality is nothing more than repetition in advance of a propaganda driven sociopolitical agenda that has devolved into acts of online conspiracy leading to targeted hate speech.
As such, the conspiracy has been targeted and not the individuals who cannot lead us out of this mess.
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
lol, well, the 'extremism' is DarthTrayel is now making theats against CD with the whole "I know where you live" crap-
I'm urging CD to ship that off to the FBI as a victim of Fair Game~
If you'd ask me, I'd say CD has a good reason to be extreme as this isn't the first time someone has tried to Fair Game him.
I hope CD does go to the FBI with this and DarthTrayel finds himself in federal prison for his failure to show restraint.
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 6
Apply that last sentence to EVERYBODY and partyv&n them all if shit doesn't moderate. From where I sit, Scientology is thinking really hard about facts on the ground and 'anonymous' is using its standard "head up ass" thinking it's the new and improved "OstrichTech."
It didn't and won't work for Scientology, and it won't work for 'anonymous.' Welcome to the 21st century where professionals as well as idiot children actually do run around on the net and have something fucking relevant to say. ;)
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
um... sure, ok~
look, I dunno what your beef is, some people want peace, some want lulz, I'm not anonymous, I don't attend the raids, I dunno.
All I can tell you is what I see.
A bunch of grumpy scns who can't take jokes and a bunch of kids pissed off someone told them they couldn't do something.
I really don't know or care, our reasons are different, but our goals are the same...
I want CoS to reform, and if they can't survive as an organization after reform, that's too damn bad.
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 3
I guess we know which one you are:)
sKepptiksowat 2 years ago
Try again. I'm not following your logic. A less cryptic answer which tell who in particular you speak to would help. Alas YouTube comments are both limiting and a challenge.
You know which of who is what?
Careful now. Either IMHO or support yourself with demonstrable facts. Otherwise the Editorial "bitch" will have to assume none of it was worth reading in the first place, and to remove you from history and hers.
So, WTF? Try again.
JAC, MSW
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
I think skepptiksowat was referring to your comment 4 days ago when you said, and I quote, "where professionals as well as idiot children actually do run around on the net and have something fucking relevant to say".
bsmtdwlr 2 years ago
Ah. That would have made more sense, and yes I would be glad to "debate" this behavior at length. I already have in monologue. I'm ready to stand for my actions and sign my name to the record, no matter how distasteful. Is skeppticksoowat?
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
I am absolutely willing to have a discussion in public with a fellow MSW. I do not say my point is the only point. I say that my videos are for a point. I have seen skepp's video and stand by my history in all venues on all sides.
I sign my name for a reason and with a credential for another. If you want justification, how about "full disclosure and personal responsibility" both online and off?
When skepp come's out of the name closet, I'll worry about this. Til then, no.
JAC MSW
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
What I do not get is why 'anonymous' bitches and moans about not getting attention from academia, then blocks academics from their website.
Colleagues have gone to the site and directly to the "Thunderdome," home of planning for irl acts of terrorism, and get banned for "suspicious behavior."
Since when was research by an individual in pursuit of truth, considered "suspicious behavior?"
Maybe go ask the gai I added to my next video. His home page is CANCER, as is his views re. 1st Amendment.
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
so you have beef with the anonymous of thunder dome...
I understand now-
well, I'm not anonymous and I don't go to the thunder dome...
I don't have any planned terrorism attacks...
also, I think CD just wants to do what Germany did, was Germany extreme?
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 3
Unless you have more recent info than I do... what is it you think Germany did? And yes, my "beef" resulted in an extended hospital stay and court mandated treatment for a diagnosis I do not and did not have going into this mess.
Jessica Ann Chandler, MSW
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago
well, I hope that works out for ya, take care
Jmbrandon9 2 years ago 2
LuLz
ntfh 2 years ago
Heh, yeah I thought so too. Is why I made da video ;)
Can ya feel da love?
ChristianlySkeptical 2 years ago