"A bullet that tears threw flesh" !!!! who ever heard of such a thing. I would much rather a round that doesn't penetrate flesh!! IS THIS IDIOT SERIOUS??? If some asshole smashed him over the head with a TV would we she sue sony? Ignorance is bliss!!!
Oh no, companies advertised their product? They stated that a bullet used for defense can kill an attacker.
Oh, now pistol rounds are vaporizing deer? I'm so glad these informed people are here to educate me.
My cousin was hit by a semi. She should sue Kenworth for advertising how powerful their trucks are. The important thing is that she isn't concerned about monetary damages as long as "THEIR IS ALLOT OF MONEtarY damages"
Both McCarthy and Snyder are morons. How does looking at a picture of a fired bullet give anyone "some idea as to what kind of damage it can do"? It's absurd. Looking at a bullet tells you nothing about it.
By that logic, I'm an expert movie special effects, since I've seen so many of them.
If I ever run an ammo company I'm gonna label the meanest thing I make as.... The innocent bystander shredder.... It won't make any fucking differance. When she sues me I'll just file bankruptcy and sell the business to my wife for a dollar. I really hate this cunt. It has also been proven that the BT was not the most effective bullet manufactured at the time. It's name was "menacing" though. I'm sorry I just can't get over how much I really hate this bitch.
By the way winchester still makes the black talon they just call it the ranger SXT. SXT actually means SAME EXACT THING. Funny. Yeah no true sportsman would use one on a dear because the fucker would probably run up to you and trample your retarded ass for useing a small pistol. Winchester markets the new bullets toward police but you can still buy them.
They are right nobody would use the Black Talons to kill a deer because they were pistol rounds. On the other hand did they ever think that the description of the rounds used by the manufacturer would be advertising toward those who carry for self defence. I would like to know how well a round would effect an attacker before I carry them on a daily basis in on of my firearms. Knowing how the bullet acts is a good bit of info for self defence.
Advertisments for profit is a 1st Amendment right. Good job. In one swoop, she is going after 2 parts of the Bill or Rights.
kelvinjavier 11 months ago
This lady is an idiot.
ReelyNotMe 1 year ago
This lady is an idiot.
ReelyNotMe 1 year ago
I don't think criminals have time to read Guns & Ammo...a fine publication i might add.
LamontDaGrizzly 2 years ago
"A bullet that tears threw flesh" !!!! who ever heard of such a thing. I would much rather a round that doesn't penetrate flesh!! IS THIS IDIOT SERIOUS??? If some asshole smashed him over the head with a TV would we she sue sony? Ignorance is bliss!!!
mountaindiesel2000 2 years ago
Oh no, companies advertised their product? They stated that a bullet used for defense can kill an attacker.
Oh, now pistol rounds are vaporizing deer? I'm so glad these informed people are here to educate me.
My cousin was hit by a semi. She should sue Kenworth for advertising how powerful their trucks are. The important thing is that she isn't concerned about monetary damages as long as "THEIR IS ALLOT OF MONEtarY damages"
guamsst 2 years ago
Dumb and Dumber
terrorterminator 3 years ago
What a pathetic pair of pinko ignoramuses.
462awest 3 years ago
Both McCarthy and Snyder are morons. How does looking at a picture of a fired bullet give anyone "some idea as to what kind of damage it can do"? It's absurd. Looking at a bullet tells you nothing about it.
By that logic, I'm an expert movie special effects, since I've seen so many of them.
TheStapleGunKid 3 years ago
If I ever run an ammo company I'm gonna label the meanest thing I make as.... The innocent bystander shredder.... It won't make any fucking differance. When she sues me I'll just file bankruptcy and sell the business to my wife for a dollar. I really hate this cunt. It has also been proven that the BT was not the most effective bullet manufactured at the time. It's name was "menacing" though. I'm sorry I just can't get over how much I really hate this bitch.
mastergunner82 3 years ago
By the way winchester still makes the black talon they just call it the ranger SXT. SXT actually means SAME EXACT THING. Funny. Yeah no true sportsman would use one on a dear because the fucker would probably run up to you and trample your retarded ass for useing a small pistol. Winchester markets the new bullets toward police but you can still buy them.
mastergunner82 3 years ago
They are right nobody would use the Black Talons to kill a deer because they were pistol rounds. On the other hand did they ever think that the description of the rounds used by the manufacturer would be advertising toward those who carry for self defence. I would like to know how well a round would effect an attacker before I carry them on a daily basis in on of my firearms. Knowing how the bullet acts is a good bit of info for self defence.
Lord666Belial 4 years ago
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Russoft 4 years ago
this asshole sees the pic of the bullet all
mushroomed and then he asks is this before its fired? what a left wing asshole!
dpezbo 4 years ago
and these are the people who make our laws, I guess emotion > logic.
Russoft 4 years ago
What a bitch.
ultrachimp 4 years ago
NEWS FLASH "Bullets that don't tear through flesh are useless" details a 11.
scurtis34471 4 years ago 2
What the hell how would there not "be much of a deer left." It's a pistol caliber you stupid bitch.
Smacklug 4 years ago
Carolyn McCarthy is a moron. Bullets tear through flesh? What a surprise! No wonder people use bullets for self defense!
HR-1022 is a joke. What part of "shall not be infringed" do these people not understand?
ResponsibleGunOwner 4 years ago
colin ferguson my hero.
garveyxkm 4 years ago