California is a weird state. So people be very careful when following any of this NON legal advise.
Some states all driving infractions are criminal offensive and you can be brought to jail for them. Yes you can go to jail for failure to put on your turn signal and your car will be towed. You then have to pay for that towing and bond, so you really do lose. Do what you want, but be very leery of using California as an example. Did you win or did you pay and can you give the info?
California is a weird state. So people be very careful when following any of this NON legal advise.
Some states all driving infractions are criminal offensive and you can be brought to jail for them. Yes you can go to jail for failure to put on your turn signal and your car will be towed. You then have to pay for that towing and bond, so you really do lose. Do what you want, but be very leery of using California as an example. Did you win or did you pay and can you give the info?
Just like you said: you are NOT a lawyer. Follow your advise: hire one when you feel like getting into what you don't have a clue about. Untill then, get off the buzz. You do sound like you are under something. Get a real life too. Call your boyfriend and appologize to him. Tell him you want him back because without him you go crazy.
When you sign for your licenses, you agree to surrender it upon request from a law enforcement officer, you agree not to resist a field sobriety test, and you agree to follow all laws pertaining to the vehicle code. You also agree to sign the ticket for you understanding that you have to appear, this is not admission of guilt. I hope no one follows this idiot’s advice.
Most tickets are legalized extortion with exorbitant fees... Any thinking person with any insight knows this. A rich person pisses ticket money. A middle class fellow like myself pays an attorney to make it go away. Either way... They-takey-the-money.
@globrain Legalised extortion is actually close to the truth. The extortion part of it being that they rely on people's ignorance to get away with fraud. It's like this... the ticket, whether speeding or parking or similar, is NOT a fine, it is an 'offer'. This is corporate contract Law. They are offering you the chance to give them money for the privilege of you doing whatever it was you did. You DO NOT have to pay. All you have to do is reply with a counter-offer. I always offer zero.
@Itsmeeman1 And how does that zero counter offer work out for you? lmao... I know a real easy way that you never have to pay the fines!!! Dont break the fucking laws jackass!!!! Lmao
@njcloud316 After my counter offer of zero, they pass on their 'offer' to a bailiff collection company that then sends me their offer of more than the original ticket. I then send them notice of my offer to the original company and mention that the matter is in dispute and that I've notified the local Police that the matter is in dispute and any attempts to gain access to my property or to take any of my property without my permission will result in charges.
@njcloud316 And it's not breaking the law JACKASS, it's standing up for my rights under Constitutional Law versus Commercial Law! JACKASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMFAO!!!!!!!!
the Supreme Court held where police have probable cause to issue a driving citation, they also have probable cause to stop the vehicle. I hope no one tries this... not even a lawyer
@Brandonduboff ....Really? Well can you please share with the world what case that was? You gave an opinion that is disguised as a fact but without the case law that proves your opinion, it is nothing more than that.
@Tactikalguy1 well, maybe you should educate yourself. Here, I'll get you started on some cases where police pulled over a person for a driving citation to issue that driving civil infraction. The court in each case states they had probable cause to stop the vehicle. Whren v US, US v Simpson, and US v Blair... pwned
What an idiot. Go ahead and try this BS in court. When you are found guilty, try appealing it and when you are turned down at every turn, come back and cry on video about how you lost.
Good Luck on July 23rd. Why do you hope the cops show up? Are you a fool? Your best bet is the cops don't show and you actually get this dismissed. If the cops DO show up, they are under NO obligation to answer any of your questions except when on the witness stand in regards to your case(s). Good luck getting them to answer the non-sequitur questions you ask. If you really want answers, why not do something productive like submit some FOIAs for actual public records that exist???
How do you get so many tickets in California? Also, how often do any of these ideas actually work? As for traffic cases in California, they are NOT civil. They are Civil-Criminal; it's different! They ARE basically criminal with civil penalties & you do NOT get the full protections of criminal law i.e. No Trial by Jury. You also don't have to agree to a contract or cause harm or have a victim; these are legislated crimes for no other reason than there is a stupid law that says they are.
You broke the law if you didn't use your signal and you deserve a ticket. I hate people like you who think they have the right to move from lane to lane or just hit your brakes and make a turn a turn without using your signal. Stop breaking the law asshole!
@SPFrobber Wrong, it is a big deal. They didn't put signal lights on cars just for the hell of it. They're there for a purpose, so that the person behind you knows what your intentions are. I hate it when someone in front of me just suddenly hits their brakes and makes a turn without any warning what so ever. That signal switch is not for decoration, it is meant to be used so use it and stop breaking the law.
@wayne1955 I signal but hey partner. It may be annoying but that is it. Just let the stuff go. Yes, there are poor drivers but I don't really worry about it after they move over. Loosen up partner. We all live once. Let's not worry about traffic signals and blah blah
@SPFrobber It's not the point that it is annoying it is the fact that drivers on the roads now days are becoming less and less courteous. The drive like idiots doing twice the speed limit, they cut people off without warning, they'll pull right out in front of you causing you to have to hit your brakes to keep from hitting them and the lunacy just continues and gets worse every year. People just totally disrespect others now days.
@wayne1955 Yah, he broke corporate law, in other words, regulations. He did not violate Common Law though, because he harmed nobody else. He just happens to understand how to defeat the regulations of the incorporated united States of America. The key is knowing how to retain all of your Rights under Common Law.
@wayne1955 AMEN!!!!!! He is probably part of the Occupy Wall Street Movement or what I like to call The Entitlement Club. They feel they are owed everything and anything by everyone. Fucking idiots!!! lmao
I'd like to see a video of him uisng this crap in court and winning....I'll probably get blocked for asking, so to everyone who has stumped him and he blocked...Good Job!!!
I just enjoy the ignorance of some people (like this guy) When people like this are found to be wrong they take their ball and go home. Proof to that is that he has blocked several members of the Law Enforcement community from posting on this and other videos of his.
I am sure that this comment won't last long either.
Listen to him if you want, but remember 'I warned you" when you are smacked with a very large fine for attempting his stupid information in court.
corpus delecti is necessary for a CRIMINAL MISDAMEANOR not a TRAFFIC VIOLATION like the citation you were issued, also... your 4th amendment right was not violated because you were NOT DETAINED OR ARRESTED, you were issued a CITATION. You were right at the beginning though, you have ZERO law training and have NO IDEA what you're talking about
corpus delecti is necessary for a CRIMINAL MISDAMEANOR not a TRAFFIC VIOLATION like the citation you were issued, also... your 4th amendment right was not violated because you were NOT DETAINED OR ARRESTED, you were issued a CITATION. You were right at the beginning though, you have ZERO law training and have NO IDEA what you're talking about
@tinmann19 ..... Your statement is proof enough that you are the one that has no clue as to what he is talking about. A person is not detained when they are stopped? It does not constitute an arrest or at the very least a seizure? Wow!!! You are too smart for me.
@CTMotorcop .... What case was it that the U.S. Supreme Court cited? I would like to know..... This is one of mine....A person has been “seized” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave. California v. Hodari, 499 U.S. 621, 626, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1551, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) (quoting from United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554, What do you have? Opinions?
Will you please read the entire ruling California v. Hodari(reasonable suspicion" required to justify stopping ) The magic part of this is JUSTIFY. If I stop a vehicle for a violation I write the summons, because that justifies the stop. Also the person was not seized, but the evidence was. But it was a good try
... from ctmotorcop in case you couldn't figure it out since you blocked him immediately after actions him that question
@Auszug21 ... I blocked him due to not ever responding and merely evading questions like this one. You will be next if you cant answer for him. I asked a question. First answer mine and I will respond to the hodari case. Ask him for me what supreme court ruling was he referring to. If you can respond in two days, you will be blocked as well. I'm done dealing with trolls.
dude....spending too much time in the prison law library? No, seriously, I'm all for you 100%, but the corrupt judges are going to do whatever they want....because they can. The judges are the same as the corrupt cops....just at a different level. The system in general is not there to help you. FACT: Our country has more people in jail per capita than any other....not Russia....China....none. Brother, it is a business.
Is this a joke? If someone were to walk into one of my states traffic courts and say that they "needed a contract" and "show where it applied to me" all one would have to do is open title 23 on the second page..... This is dangerous to be telling people this with the title "this is why I can beat tickets in every state". Not true where I live.
@Tactikalguy1 Vermont. Also, if you tried that in neighboring New Hamphire or Massachussets, the tickets there are criminal offenses so it won't work there either.
@lionel21000 ..... It is criminal in California too!!!! Yet look at the many youtube viewers from here and other states that say traffic is criminal. Bet you wont say jack in those videos. :P
@Tactikalguy1 LOL the problem is that people see some stupid video or expereince one thing a one court and think they know everything. States have some WAY different laws for sure!
@lionel21000 .... They do. However, if you know how to research, you will be able to find that every state laws that are violated by the police, da, or judge if not all 3. Point them out and you will win every time. If you dont win, atleast you can take them to federal court for a few hundred dollars which is usually less than the fine. So, problem solved.
@Tactikalguy1 Really? To go through the appeal process in my state means that you have to show the magistrate ruled in appropriately and then go to a judge in probate. Its a civil violation. If the judge there rules against you, there is no more appeal, its not criminal. The only way that a federal court could come into play is if you can prove that the officer has violated your civil rights. Appearing in 3 different courts would cost a lot more than a ticket.
@lionel21000 .... To go to federal court you do not have to go to an appellate court. So, if a person can prove that the officer violated their civil rights, 400 is all they would need. How is that more expensive than a ticket? You must not have gotten one lately.
I like your logic here ... unfortunately for me Texas files traffic laws under Criminal. That said ... since I live in Texas I can carry a gun with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds ... so I WIN!
do u have any info on how to put a lawsuit on a officer that pulled u over just for being profiled meaning they stop u but all your info is good they come back and say u are free to go , i would gladly leave a donation for the cause
OMG you jerk idiots and that "common law", "have to agree by contract CRAP". If that were true how would anyone get arrested for anything, anywhere, anytime.... "Yea, I killed the little old lady but I didn't sign a contract agreeing to abide by the murder statute." HAHA MY GOD YOU people are freaking NUTS!!!!! PLEASE, TELL ME which states claim their traffic laws are civil matters.....thank god you preface this by saying its not legal advice. You can't advise someone on how to dake a dump
Crime is ANY violation of the law. Traffic Violations are Traffic Laws. Complain all you want about thinking that a turn signal isn't a big deal, but consider how you'd feel if you were walking across a street not knowing someone was about to turn into it. Also consider how you would feel if you were driving and someone just shot into your lane inches in front of you. People deserve a warning before a vehicle enters a traffic lane that they're on. Not giving that warning is endangering life
@DCPyro3000 Good point. Prior Restraint can also be used to resolve so many other problems too. Did you know that statistically it has been shown black males between the ages of 12 & 19 are 70% more likely to commit violent crimes than whites? To protect society we should incarcerate all black male teenagers until their 20th brithday. People are more endangered if we just let them roam around possibly attacking innocent people w/o warning. Damn their "constitutional rights".
I wonder if the commentator has considered using a "get out of jail free" card. If that doesn't work, the "chance" card may be played as well...I think you'd have just about as much luck with that or this silly shit.
where did you go to law school.. ??? I hear a lot opinions not case law and statutory law.......... Interesting college thesis for constitutional law nothing more.
Hey wasup bro, I recognize your voice homie, you've been having the same exact problems as me, in Glendale, in Burbank, north hollywood, and fucking Hollywood and u know I'm on the same fucking mission bro, these other people have no idea what it's like to constantly face these pigs with nuts in hand, hit me up we exchange information learned, lowkey213@gmail.com
The whole system is BS.... why should I have to pay yearly registration for my car? why do I have to register it at all? Everyone just accepts this shit because "That's the way it is" but if you really actually step back and think about it the whole system is a joke... It's purely so Uncle Sam can play Big brother and make money while he's at it...
lol i did not know that everyone on utube is a qualified and competent attorney. shut the fuck up get a license, register and insure your vehical, obey traffic laws and you have no reason to worry. some ppl spend more time on trying to get around the law then it takes to jus obey the law. fucking retards. this coming from a cannibis smoker but u now what never been caught, why you ask cause i obey the law otherwise and havent been stoped by a cop in years. not even for speeding.
@ahmathisrael2 not all white people are in on this, if that were the case black people would still be enslaved in this country. There are devils masquerading as white people. Just like Obama is masquerading as the President.
Show me, you complete twit, where in the US Constitution it mentions anything about vehicles or roadways at all. I'm assuming, now this will blow your mind, that back in the mid 1700s, there weren't many vehicles or roads, and they certainly wouldn't have been a topic of interest for our founding forefathers.
THE ONLY WAY TO BEAT TICKETS IS TO ASK FOR A VERIFIED COMPLAINT NOT A NOTICE TO APPEAR. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAVE FILE A VERIFIED COMPLAINT. ASK FOR THE COMPLAINT AND THE JUDGE WILL REQUEST IT AND THE DA WILL BE BUSY WITH OTHER REAL CRIMES AND NOT FILE A VERIFIED COMPAINT BECAUSE THEN HE WILL HAVE TO SHOW UP AT COURT. YOUR CASE WILL BE THROWN OUT
@cracksmoker321 EVERY SINGLE TIME A COP WRITES A TICKET THEY USURP THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY. DEMAND A VERIFIED COMPLAINT BE FILED. HOW CAN THE "PEOPLE" OF YOUR STATE BRING A CHARGE AGAINST YOU WITHOUT A PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PRESENT? THE COP IS NOT A PROSECUTOR, MERELY A WITNESS. THIS SHIT TURNS THE ENTIRE AMERICAN SYSTEM ON ITS HEAD
@brittboyer1 "There is no right to a verified complaint when the citation is issued on an approved form. [See People v Barron (1995) 37 CA4th Supp 1, 3–5.] A defendant who contends that the notice to appear is defective must raise the issue before trial by filing a demurrer. [See PC §§1004(2), 1012; People v Gompper (1984) 160 CA3d Supp 1, 8–9.]"
YOU FUCKING MORON. it is you that doesnt know what the fuck you are talking about.The notice to appear is only valid if you do not demur
@brittboyer1 "A notice to appear that is filed with the court serves as a verified complaint to which the defendant-driver may plead GUILTY or NO CONTEST. [VC §40513(a).] If the defendant violates his or her promise to appear or ENTERS A PLEA OTHER THAN GUILTY OR NO CONTEST, a verified complaint [see PC §§948 et seq] MUST be filed, unless the defendant executes a written waiver of this requirement and an election to proceed on the notice to appear. [VC §40513(a).]"
@brittboyer1 way to prove me wrong by the way. pointing out that my name says "crack smoker" really destroyed my argument!good job you should be on the debate team
@cracksmoker321 My original post is so old, I can't find it. It must have taken you 3 or 4 months to come up with this reply,,,oh,,oh,,,oh you got me,,,,,,
google: How i Clobbered Every Beurocratic Cash Confiscatory Agency Known to Man by Mary Croft. download the PDF Read it. it will open your eyes to some amazing things that have been right in front of everybody the WHOLE time.
Is it possible to get a headache if your IQ lowers? Cause I think I just did.
You're in a car, a car that you are PERMITTED by the state to drive. Not given a natural born right. The state gets the charges to press and they press them, unless it's a small traffic ticket then its a city mater unless it goes to county and ultimately are all pressed by the state sense they take care of all final legal state permitted maters. Its just up to the court to say if the charge was right.
@Tactikalguy1 You are talking like you have a right to drive. First thing you learn is there is no RIGHT it is a privlage. And a thinker would have thought of all the steps all this goes through before saying such thoughtless shit lmao. Think before you speak and the real key is not to think to much or you think to deeply and instead of seeing through you only start seeing passed the objective to the out come. Now think about that for a while ;)
@Tactikalguy1 What advice is that? Not to assume I have all rights to drive a car just cause the keys are in my hand whether I'm ok by law to drive it or otherwise? By the way you're talking I should never be able to get a speeding ticket, DUI, fill out an accident report, if a tail lights out I shouldnt have to fix it. I wish it was that easy lmao My life would be a whole lot easier if that was the case.
@whiskeydence02 .....It would be if you knew the law. Knowing your rights wouldnt hurt either. However, since you believe what you believe, I will not argue with you about your beliefs. As morpheus put it, "Not everyone believes in what I believe in and my beliefs do not require you to."
@Tactikalguy1ahhh lol I know enough about the law to know when not to talk out my ass and say stupid shit when I gotta stand up to them. And I live in kansas and I'm a guy that listens to hard rock with long hair, not a faggot tear in my beer punkass with a crue cut like most these meth head dope fiends and ususally its hard for some one like me to make the law work for me and I do just fine. I know the LAW not what I (meaning you) want to believe as the law. when was the last .
@whiskeydence02 ....Sounds like you have been to lazy to go through my newest videos and too quick to type. Not just me but many others have won their cases using this bullshit. However, I am sure you wont type anything in the videos where others have won. This is how the word "troll" came into existence.
@Tactikalguy1 LMAO!!!!!!!!!You quote a fictional character in a movie and that is your defense? Show a video of a court ruling or a court room in which you or anyone actually win. Not some paperwork without anyone's name or any written court decision. All you post is some random paperwork and a recording of someone who claims to have won in Cali.....How is it to fail so hard?
@whiskeydence02 But in the end the state makes and enforces the final outcome of the laws and charges to go along with those laws. Witch means bone head it is in fact a state mater. Once the STATE signs the documents and seal you are in fact legal to prove you have done nothing illegal. If you can do so and you get charged anyway you may then take it to supreme court and they will decide if you have done nothing wrong, sign an appeal and you may fight it there. Good luck :)
If you are on the highways without a license to operate a motor vehicle, then you are subject to laws governing citizenry. Being a citizen. If you are not a citizen, then you can do as you please, as Congress has made it very clear time and time again....
Look up Rod Class com, watch some of his videos and listen to his talkshoe, he is using their system to fight and win. He uses their laws and procedures (because they don't follow procedures) against them.
To the OP. I watched 2 minutes of your ill-informed babble, and closed out the video.
You want to see the contract to which any law applies to you, in any given state whilst in a motor vehicle? You'll need only pull out your drivers license. Because you sir... gasp, get this shit Alfredo, signed the license permitting you on US Highways. There's your legal, including and especially binding contract to which you are obliged.
@G35Nicholas he should take this vid down, y is it still up? to the dumass who made the vid, u signed the contract to get ur license.... o wait, u sound mexican so nm, so hopefully u just get deported but that prolly won't happen
@G35Nicholas well the problem is the mandatory license is illegal. Where in the constitution does it say I need permission and must surrender my rights to use the public roadways. You show me that.
@nerys71 Roadways are not mentioned in the constitution. The Roadways are built and maintained by the government and therefore they have a duty and obligation to maintain safety and order there. I'm not a constitutional lawyer but I'd imagine it would fall under the general well being of citizens. Part of this is requiring a license for operating a motor vehicle which incorrectly used can be a weapon. Part of this also is having laws in place for operating those vehicles.
@nerys71 Driving is a privilege, not a right. Read your drivers manual and the paperwork you signed to get your license and you'll probably read some important legal jargon that proves your video invalid and utterly pointless
@420991 Absolutely NO state law or local law or any other law may "violate" the constitution. the only way to supercede the constitution is via a constitutional amendment. Period.
@nerys71 Just to piggy back on this, It is Article 3 of constitution that states that anything conflicting with federal law is not withstanding if I am not mistaken. It get's tricky when you talk about equity law because it is a states version of common law to loosen the rigor of the constitution and any treaties in effect.
@nerys71 sorry where in the constitution are you given the rights to drive @ all? That is why you need a license. Driving is a privilege not a right. Learn the law.
@007sephiroth1 You learn the law. The Institution guarantees the "right to travel". It is a right not a privilege. Here let me be more helpful to you than your rude comment was here. Google "Badernik Constitution Classes."
@nerys71 You can legally use public roadways without a license all day long...as long as you're walking or riding a bike. BUT, operating a motor vehicle on public roadways (the construction and maintenance of which is governement-funded) requires a valid drivers license, among other things. The license is only mandatory if you wish to enjoy the *privilege* (not a right) of driving a car on those roadways.
@wshester Once again. you needed no license or permission to take your horse on the public roadways nor your carriage on the public roadways. The only difference between horse and carriage and your car is the level of mechanization. nothing more. They are perfect analogs.
Your RIGHT to drive has been illegally stripped from you. it is NOT a privilege. it is an illegally denied right.
@nerys71 it's a privilege if your STATE LAW says it's only a privilege. Your state laws are put together under the same constitutional rights that you think you have. Your state legislatures have the RIGHT (under the constitution) to make laws that they see fit that will be best for the state. You forget that the constitution you use is the same they use and with the help of attorneys, they find the loopholes in the constitution since most of it is up to interpretation like the words in a
@notaroundme no its the same one they IGNORE. I am sorry but facts history and the law support me. Their ignorance of the law and their flat out unlawful activity being "enforceable" via police and courts is not really that different than the mafia enforcing protection schemes with "thugs" and baseball bats.
Just as illegal except this one is worse as its abused under the color of law.
@notaroundme well I don't have an army that can put down the unlawful governments so I only have the weapon we all have. Education and Communication. Educate enough people to care and change "WILL" happen.
All I can do is try. until then like the helpless store owner in history I PAY the protection money because the thug will use his bat if I don't
@wshester Oh really? The Supreme Court disagrees. "The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579. Do your research before posting false information. Thanks.
This has been flagged as spam show
California is a weird state. So people be very careful when following any of this NON legal advise.
Some states all driving infractions are criminal offensive and you can be brought to jail for them. Yes you can go to jail for failure to put on your turn signal and your car will be towed. You then have to pay for that towing and bond, so you really do lose. Do what you want, but be very leery of using California as an example. Did you win or did you pay and can you give the info?
NewOrleansBoy1970 12 hours ago
California is a weird state. So people be very careful when following any of this NON legal advise.
Some states all driving infractions are criminal offensive and you can be brought to jail for them. Yes you can go to jail for failure to put on your turn signal and your car will be towed. You then have to pay for that towing and bond, so you really do lose. Do what you want, but be very leery of using California as an example. Did you win or did you pay and can you give the info?
NewOrleansBoy1970 12 hours ago
Just like you said: you are NOT a lawyer. Follow your advise: hire one when you feel like getting into what you don't have a clue about. Untill then, get off the buzz. You do sound like you are under something. Get a real life too. Call your boyfriend and appologize to him. Tell him you want him back because without him you go crazy.
antoniotorino45 19 hours ago
@antoniotorino45 Dude that was awesome..... LMAO. Gaylord is in distress!!
njcloud316 16 hours ago
Sounds like you know your shit. I wonder if this would actually work... Have you ever gotten out of any tickets with this?
SmithersThe 1 day ago
When you sign for your licenses, you agree to surrender it upon request from a law enforcement officer, you agree not to resist a field sobriety test, and you agree to follow all laws pertaining to the vehicle code. You also agree to sign the ticket for you understanding that you have to appear, this is not admission of guilt. I hope no one follows this idiot’s advice.
INGRAMDR 1 day ago
Most tickets are legalized extortion with exorbitant fees... Any thinking person with any insight knows this. A rich person pisses ticket money. A middle class fellow like myself pays an attorney to make it go away. Either way... They-takey-the-money.
globrain 3 days ago
@globrain Legalised extortion is actually close to the truth. The extortion part of it being that they rely on people's ignorance to get away with fraud. It's like this... the ticket, whether speeding or parking or similar, is NOT a fine, it is an 'offer'. This is corporate contract Law. They are offering you the chance to give them money for the privilege of you doing whatever it was you did. You DO NOT have to pay. All you have to do is reply with a counter-offer. I always offer zero.
Itsmeeman1 1 day ago
@Itsmeeman1 And how does that zero counter offer work out for you? lmao... I know a real easy way that you never have to pay the fines!!! Dont break the fucking laws jackass!!!! Lmao
njcloud316 16 hours ago
@njcloud316 After my counter offer of zero, they pass on their 'offer' to a bailiff collection company that then sends me their offer of more than the original ticket. I then send them notice of my offer to the original company and mention that the matter is in dispute and that I've notified the local Police that the matter is in dispute and any attempts to gain access to my property or to take any of my property without my permission will result in charges.
That's the end of the matter!
Itsmeeman1 15 hours ago
@njcloud316 And it's not breaking the law JACKASS, it's standing up for my rights under Constitutional Law versus Commercial Law! JACKASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMFAO!!!!!!!!
Dumb Ass
Itsmeeman1 15 hours ago
Driving while Mexican.
akirafactor 4 days ago
Dude your so dumb, not using a turn signal is a crime, a traffic violation is a crime. its a very small one, but its still a crime
samrscales 4 days ago
@samrscales You should look things up before you try to make things up... a traffic ticket is a civil infraction...
Brandonduboff 4 days ago
@samrscales Corpus delicti - "Produce my victim" Unfortunately this is NOT "united States of America" (as penned in the Constitution) anymore
....It is "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"! (corporate/government merge
sikovit 4 days ago
just another youtube trol
swizard13 4 days ago
the Supreme Court held where police have probable cause to issue a driving citation, they also have probable cause to stop the vehicle. I hope no one tries this... not even a lawyer
Brandonduboff 4 days ago
@Brandonduboff ....Really? Well can you please share with the world what case that was? You gave an opinion that is disguised as a fact but without the case law that proves your opinion, it is nothing more than that.
Tactikalguy1 4 days ago 5
@Tactikalguy1 well, maybe you should educate yourself. Here, I'll get you started on some cases where police pulled over a person for a driving citation to issue that driving civil infraction. The court in each case states they had probable cause to stop the vehicle. Whren v US, US v Simpson, and US v Blair... pwned
Brandonduboff 4 days ago
@Tactikalguy1 Under Terry v. Ohio, a brief stop and detention requires a reasonable suspicion, not probable cause.
jjcraig999 2 days ago 2
4th amendment only applies to searches...not stops. Get it right.
jjcraig999 2 days ago
@Tactikalguy1 Moron
jjcraig999 2 days ago
Did you win?
grimview 5 days ago
What an idiot. Go ahead and try this BS in court. When you are found guilty, try appealing it and when you are turned down at every turn, come back and cry on video about how you lost.
What a loser.
saa001 5 days ago
Good thing you're not trying to pass this off as legal advice..........
feraxks 1 week ago
@feraxks hahahhhahahahaaaa seriously!
USALeadsTheWay 1 week ago
bastard go back to mexico
lolaturmomsswag 1 week ago
jailhouse lawyer,in the real world you probably been maceed at .59!lol
igobackwards 1 week ago
Dude, you're an idiot, you don't even have a grasp on English and you're trying to school people on beating tickets?
Madwand1 1 week ago
Good Luck on July 23rd. Why do you hope the cops show up? Are you a fool? Your best bet is the cops don't show and you actually get this dismissed. If the cops DO show up, they are under NO obligation to answer any of your questions except when on the witness stand in regards to your case(s). Good luck getting them to answer the non-sequitur questions you ask. If you really want answers, why not do something productive like submit some FOIAs for actual public records that exist???
NETWizzJbirk 1 week ago
How do you get so many tickets in California? Also, how often do any of these ideas actually work? As for traffic cases in California, they are NOT civil. They are Civil-Criminal; it's different! They ARE basically criminal with civil penalties & you do NOT get the full protections of criminal law i.e. No Trial by Jury. You also don't have to agree to a contract or cause harm or have a victim; these are legislated crimes for no other reason than there is a stupid law that says they are.
NETWizzJbirk 1 week ago
and now we have given them the patriot act. this mean's nothing, If they really want to stop you.
jims99tvs 1 week ago
You broke the law if you didn't use your signal and you deserve a ticket. I hate people like you who think they have the right to move from lane to lane or just hit your brakes and make a turn a turn without using your signal. Stop breaking the law asshole!
wayne1955 1 week ago 6
@wayne1955 ur kinda being a baby aren't ya? Failure to use a signal isn't a huge big deal partner. Calm down
SPFrobber 1 week ago
@SPFrobber Wrong, it is a big deal. They didn't put signal lights on cars just for the hell of it. They're there for a purpose, so that the person behind you knows what your intentions are. I hate it when someone in front of me just suddenly hits their brakes and makes a turn without any warning what so ever. That signal switch is not for decoration, it is meant to be used so use it and stop breaking the law.
wayne1955 1 week ago
@wayne1955 waaa
try using your eyes...
SPFrobber 1 week ago
@SPFrobber You're just another jerk who thinks they don't have to abide by the law. Get over yourself.
wayne1955 1 week ago
@wayne1955 I signal but hey partner. It may be annoying but that is it. Just let the stuff go. Yes, there are poor drivers but I don't really worry about it after they move over. Loosen up partner. We all live once. Let's not worry about traffic signals and blah blah
SPFrobber 6 days ago
@SPFrobber It's not the point that it is annoying it is the fact that drivers on the roads now days are becoming less and less courteous. The drive like idiots doing twice the speed limit, they cut people off without warning, they'll pull right out in front of you causing you to have to hit your brakes to keep from hitting them and the lunacy just continues and gets worse every year. People just totally disrespect others now days.
wayne1955 6 days ago
@wayne1955 Yah, he broke corporate law, in other words, regulations. He did not violate Common Law though, because he harmed nobody else. He just happens to understand how to defeat the regulations of the incorporated united States of America. The key is knowing how to retain all of your Rights under Common Law.
hucksquire 5 days ago
@wayne1955 AMEN!!!!!! He is probably part of the Occupy Wall Street Movement or what I like to call The Entitlement Club. They feel they are owed everything and anything by everyone. Fucking idiots!!! lmao
njcloud316 16 hours ago
if you dont use your turn signal you have broken the law and therefore a valid target for being pulled over.. refill your blinker fluid and use it..
doinworksonnnnn 1 week ago
@doinworksonnnnn blinker fluid? you mean slam a beer before a lane change?
SPFrobber 1 week ago
I bet he still had to pay for the ticket. lol
jbeason9 1 week ago
I bet he still had to pay for the ticket. lol
jbeason9 1 week ago
I'd like to see a video of him uisng this crap in court and winning....I'll probably get blocked for asking, so to everyone who has stumped him and he blocked...Good Job!!!
brittboyer1 1 week ago 4
@brittboyer1 ...Hahahha good job indeed!
Tactikalguy1 1 week ago
@Tactikalguy1 Did you really win it? Please tell me.. curious!
burso772 1 week ago
I just enjoy the ignorance of some people (like this guy) When people like this are found to be wrong they take their ball and go home. Proof to that is that he has blocked several members of the Law Enforcement community from posting on this and other videos of his.
I am sure that this comment won't last long either.
Listen to him if you want, but remember 'I warned you" when you are smacked with a very large fine for attempting his stupid information in court.
dasenulf 1 week ago
Comment removed
Auszug21 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
corpus delecti is necessary for a CRIMINAL MISDAMEANOR not a TRAFFIC VIOLATION like the citation you were issued, also... your 4th amendment right was not violated because you were NOT DETAINED OR ARRESTED, you were issued a CITATION. You were right at the beginning though, you have ZERO law training and have NO IDEA what you're talking about
tinmann19 2 weeks ago
corpus delecti is necessary for a CRIMINAL MISDAMEANOR not a TRAFFIC VIOLATION like the citation you were issued, also... your 4th amendment right was not violated because you were NOT DETAINED OR ARRESTED, you were issued a CITATION. You were right at the beginning though, you have ZERO law training and have NO IDEA what you're talking about
tinmann19 2 weeks ago
@tinmann19 ..... Your statement is proof enough that you are the one that has no clue as to what he is talking about. A person is not detained when they are stopped? It does not constitute an arrest or at the very least a seizure? Wow!!! You are too smart for me.
Tactikalguy1 2 weeks ago
@Tactikalguy1 traffic stop, Im not detained but i can't leave without the cops permission. go figure!
iipecz 2 weeks ago
@tinmann19 You are so correct on this. A traffic stop is not and has even been ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court as not an arrest or detention
I would love to have him come to our State and try this.
CTMotorcop 2 weeks ago
@CTMotorcop .... What case was it that the U.S. Supreme Court cited? I would like to know..... This is one of mine....A person has been “seized” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave. California v. Hodari, 499 U.S. 621, 626, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1551, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) (quoting from United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554, What do you have? Opinions?
Tactikalguy1 2 weeks ago
@Tactikalguy1
Will you please read the entire ruling California v. Hodari(reasonable suspicion" required to justify stopping ) The magic part of this is JUSTIFY. If I stop a vehicle for a violation I write the summons, because that justifies the stop. Also the person was not seized, but the evidence was. But it was a good try
... from ctmotorcop in case you couldn't figure it out since you blocked him immediately after actions him that question
Auszug21 2 weeks ago
@Auszug21 ... I blocked him due to not ever responding and merely evading questions like this one. You will be next if you cant answer for him. I asked a question. First answer mine and I will respond to the hodari case. Ask him for me what supreme court ruling was he referring to. If you can respond in two days, you will be blocked as well. I'm done dealing with trolls.
Tactikalguy1 2 weeks ago
@CTMotorcop arrested no! detained yes! if you don't think so why do you have to ask the officer for permission to leave?
iipecz 2 weeks ago
Any updates?
Good for you man, fight their dirty asses.
MeCallCrazy 2 weeks ago
Hey vato, how did it turn out?
hoseqt1 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
JanRichardus 2 weeks ago
dude....spending too much time in the prison law library? No, seriously, I'm all for you 100%, but the corrupt judges are going to do whatever they want....because they can. The judges are the same as the corrupt cops....just at a different level. The system in general is not there to help you. FACT: Our country has more people in jail per capita than any other....not Russia....China....none. Brother, it is a business.
Plissken68 3 weeks ago
Is this a joke? If someone were to walk into one of my states traffic courts and say that they "needed a contract" and "show where it applied to me" all one would have to do is open title 23 on the second page..... This is dangerous to be telling people this with the title "this is why I can beat tickets in every state". Not true where I live.
lionel21000 3 weeks ago
@lionel21000 .... Where do you live?
Tactikalguy1 3 weeks ago
@Tactikalguy1 Vermont. Also, if you tried that in neighboring New Hamphire or Massachussets, the tickets there are criminal offenses so it won't work there either.
lionel21000 3 weeks ago
@lionel21000 ..... It is criminal in California too!!!! Yet look at the many youtube viewers from here and other states that say traffic is criminal. Bet you wont say jack in those videos. :P
Tactikalguy1 3 weeks ago
@Tactikalguy1 LOL the problem is that people see some stupid video or expereince one thing a one court and think they know everything. States have some WAY different laws for sure!
lionel21000 3 weeks ago
@lionel21000 .... They do. However, if you know how to research, you will be able to find that every state laws that are violated by the police, da, or judge if not all 3. Point them out and you will win every time. If you dont win, atleast you can take them to federal court for a few hundred dollars which is usually less than the fine. So, problem solved.
Tactikalguy1 3 weeks ago
@Tactikalguy1 Really? To go through the appeal process in my state means that you have to show the magistrate ruled in appropriately and then go to a judge in probate. Its a civil violation. If the judge there rules against you, there is no more appeal, its not criminal. The only way that a federal court could come into play is if you can prove that the officer has violated your civil rights. Appearing in 3 different courts would cost a lot more than a ticket.
lionel21000 3 weeks ago
@lionel21000 .... To go to federal court you do not have to go to an appellate court. So, if a person can prove that the officer violated their civil rights, 400 is all they would need. How is that more expensive than a ticket? You must not have gotten one lately.
Tactikalguy1 3 weeks ago
I like your logic here ... unfortunately for me Texas files traffic laws under Criminal. That said ... since I live in Texas I can carry a gun with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds ... so I WIN!
HumbleWillis 3 weeks ago
reasonable suspicion. cop can stop you anytime
weinmanjoe 3 weeks ago
@weinmanjoe .... They do. But if the defendant files a motion to suppress, they are in trouble. I would know.
Tactikalguy1 3 weeks ago
do u have any info on how to put a lawsuit on a officer that pulled u over just for being profiled meaning they stop u but all your info is good they come back and say u are free to go , i would gladly leave a donation for the cause
topchoice32 3 weeks ago
I just wish you people were really as smart as you think you are.
MrSpanky1218 3 weeks ago
This guy's a moron.....Wow.......You damn right your not an attorney.
notaroundme 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG you jerk idiots and that "common law", "have to agree by contract CRAP". If that were true how would anyone get arrested for anything, anywhere, anytime.... "Yea, I killed the little old lady but I didn't sign a contract agreeing to abide by the murder statute." HAHA MY GOD YOU people are freaking NUTS!!!!! PLEASE, TELL ME which states claim their traffic laws are civil matters.....thank god you preface this by saying its not legal advice. You can't advise someone on how to dake a dump
pibcos 3 weeks ago
Ron Paul 2012......
jasonottthetroll 4 weeks ago
Vote Ron Paul and have someone uphold the US Constitution from the White House on down.
Ron Paul 2012.
wellingtonian 1 month ago
your my hero
allbus808ish 1 month ago
Sorry, you're a TOTAL moron. Please lose the accent/lisp or whatever as well. Good day to you, sir.
xxtheshutoutxx 1 month ago
Crime is ANY violation of the law. Traffic Violations are Traffic Laws. Complain all you want about thinking that a turn signal isn't a big deal, but consider how you'd feel if you were walking across a street not knowing someone was about to turn into it. Also consider how you would feel if you were driving and someone just shot into your lane inches in front of you. People deserve a warning before a vehicle enters a traffic lane that they're on. Not giving that warning is endangering life
DCPyro3000 1 month ago
@DCPyro3000 Good point. Prior Restraint can also be used to resolve so many other problems too. Did you know that statistically it has been shown black males between the ages of 12 & 19 are 70% more likely to commit violent crimes than whites? To protect society we should incarcerate all black male teenagers until their 20th brithday. People are more endangered if we just let them roam around possibly attacking innocent people w/o warning. Damn their "constitutional rights".
happinessisnowhere 4 weeks ago
Then you shouldnt sign something without knowing what youre putting your signature towards. Its simple, noone is going to hold your hand people....
G35Nicholas 1 month ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@G35Nicholas Our system is based on " voluntary compliance".
DON'T COMPLY, DON'T SIGN ANYTHING.
JanRichardus 2 weeks ago
Driving isnt a right. This false sense of entitlement is why America is doomed.....
G35Nicholas 1 month ago
Right to travel is not the right to drive. DA
46wireboy 1 month ago
AHAHAH this guy is not very bright lol
TrumphMike 1 month ago
driving is a privelige, not a right. traveling is a right, they didnt have cars back when the constitution was created, moron
skeletorbo 1 month ago
@skeletorbo boy are you dumb! Go study constitutional law at Yale or be dumber and end up in jail!!
7ghostryder 1 month ago
@G35Nicolas learn the law nerys71 is right its ur constitutional right to drive educate your self
slickkiller6921 1 month ago
I wonder if the commentator has considered using a "get out of jail free" card. If that doesn't work, the "chance" card may be played as well...I think you'd have just about as much luck with that or this silly shit.
hitcharide1 1 month ago
you people with that defending the government kill me.
d1rdyd 1 month ago
where did you go to law school.. ??? I hear a lot opinions not case law and statutory law.......... Interesting college thesis for constitutional law nothing more.
epyon02 1 month ago
Hey wasup bro, I recognize your voice homie, you've been having the same exact problems as me, in Glendale, in Burbank, north hollywood, and fucking Hollywood and u know I'm on the same fucking mission bro, these other people have no idea what it's like to constantly face these pigs with nuts in hand, hit me up we exchange information learned, lowkey213@gmail.com
lowkey213 1 month ago
Or, how about you just learn to drive.
natebob365 1 month ago
The whole system is BS.... why should I have to pay yearly registration for my car? why do I have to register it at all? Everyone just accepts this shit because "That's the way it is" but if you really actually step back and think about it the whole system is a joke... It's purely so Uncle Sam can play Big brother and make money while he's at it...
nightmathzombieethan 1 month ago
lol i did not know that everyone on utube is a qualified and competent attorney. shut the fuck up get a license, register and insure your vehical, obey traffic laws and you have no reason to worry. some ppl spend more time on trying to get around the law then it takes to jus obey the law. fucking retards. this coming from a cannibis smoker but u now what never been caught, why you ask cause i obey the law otherwise and havent been stoped by a cop in years. not even for speeding.
ShoulderOfYourGod825 1 month ago
"Using emergency lights when there is no emergency?"
You clearly don't even know how a routine traffic stop works so nothing you say is valid.
IsThisSiteGayorWhat 1 month ago
Another internet genius that KNOWS THE LAW!!
fishman2185 1 month ago
Still using XP...
AwesomeFace50 1 month ago
Not using your turn signal? Is this a new invention to you, Moron!!!
MrPoosa1 1 month ago
THE WHITE MAN IS IS THE DEVIL THE BIBLE SPEAKS OF! DEVIL= DECIEVER
ahmathisrael2 1 month ago
@ahmathisrael2 yea the white man is a devil!!! what? im white?... cool
REMIX8604 1 month ago
@ahmathisrael2 not all white people are in on this, if that were the case black people would still be enslaved in this country. There are devils masquerading as white people. Just like Obama is masquerading as the President.
jimyrichardson 1 month ago
Show me, you complete twit, where in the US Constitution it mentions anything about vehicles or roadways at all. I'm assuming, now this will blow your mind, that back in the mid 1700s, there weren't many vehicles or roads, and they certainly wouldn't have been a topic of interest for our founding forefathers.
Imbecile.
G35Nicholas 1 month ago
hey loser - we don't believe you, and you only end up in more trouble with the court...
rarelibra 1 month ago
hahaha dont bring this crap to a Court room in state of Georgia...... but good try.
jph090880 1 month ago
THE ONLY WAY TO BEAT TICKETS IS TO ASK FOR A VERIFIED COMPLAINT NOT A NOTICE TO APPEAR. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAVE FILE A VERIFIED COMPLAINT. ASK FOR THE COMPLAINT AND THE JUDGE WILL REQUEST IT AND THE DA WILL BE BUSY WITH OTHER REAL CRIMES AND NOT FILE A VERIFIED COMPAINT BECAUSE THEN HE WILL HAVE TO SHOW UP AT COURT. YOUR CASE WILL BE THROWN OUT
cracksmoker321 1 month ago
@cracksmoker321 IN CALIFORNIA THE ONLY WAY TO DO THIS IS BY FILING A DEMURRER AND REQUESTING A VERIFIED COMPLAINT FROM THE DA OR DA'S OFFICE
cracksmoker321 1 month ago
@cracksmoker321 EVERY SINGLE TIME A COP WRITES A TICKET THEY USURP THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY. DEMAND A VERIFIED COMPLAINT BE FILED. HOW CAN THE "PEOPLE" OF YOUR STATE BRING A CHARGE AGAINST YOU WITHOUT A PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PRESENT? THE COP IS NOT A PROSECUTOR, MERELY A WITNESS. THIS SHIT TURNS THE ENTIRE AMERICAN SYSTEM ON ITS HEAD
cracksmoker321 1 month ago
@cracksmoker321 your name explains why you actually believe this crap will work in court!!!
brittboyer1 1 month ago
Comment removed
cracksmoker321 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brittboyer1 "There is no right to a verified complaint when the citation is issued on an approved form. [See People v Barron (1995) 37 CA4th Supp 1, 3–5.] A defendant who contends that the notice to appear is defective must raise the issue before trial by filing a demurrer. [See PC §§1004(2), 1012; People v Gompper (1984) 160 CA3d Supp 1, 8–9.]"
YOU FUCKING MORON. it is you that doesnt know what the fuck you are talking about.The notice to appear is only valid if you do not demur
cracksmoker321 2 weeks ago
@brittboyer1 "A notice to appear that is filed with the court serves as a verified complaint to which the defendant-driver may plead GUILTY or NO CONTEST. [VC §40513(a).] If the defendant violates his or her promise to appear or ENTERS A PLEA OTHER THAN GUILTY OR NO CONTEST, a verified complaint [see PC §§948 et seq] MUST be filed, unless the defendant executes a written waiver of this requirement and an election to proceed on the notice to appear. [VC §40513(a).]"
cracksmoker321 2 weeks ago
@cracksmoker321 I can't even find the original post, so this proves what???
brittboyer1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brittboyer1 your original comment says this:"@cracksmoker321 your name explains why you actually believe this crap will work in court!!!"
and i just proved to you that it is the actual law and does work in court
cracksmoker321 1 week ago
Comment removed
cracksmoker321 2 weeks ago
@brittboyer1 way to prove me wrong by the way. pointing out that my name says "crack smoker" really destroyed my argument!good job you should be on the debate team
cracksmoker321 2 weeks ago
@cracksmoker321 My original post is so old, I can't find it. It must have taken you 3 or 4 months to come up with this reply,,,oh,,oh,,,oh you got me,,,,,,
brittboyer1 2 weeks ago
google: How i Clobbered Every Beurocratic Cash Confiscatory Agency Known to Man by Mary Croft. download the PDF Read it. it will open your eyes to some amazing things that have been right in front of everybody the WHOLE time.
theabyss650 1 month ago
Theres alot of good arguments going both ways on this. Can you tell us what the outcome was? Just curious
70clint 1 month ago
Is it possible to get a headache if your IQ lowers? Cause I think I just did.
You're in a car, a car that you are PERMITTED by the state to drive. Not given a natural born right. The state gets the charges to press and they press them, unless it's a small traffic ticket then its a city mater unless it goes to county and ultimately are all pressed by the state sense they take care of all final legal state permitted maters. Its just up to the court to say if the charge was right.
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02..... Take an aspirin. You dont sound like a thinker.
Tactikalguy1 1 month ago
@Tactikalguy1 You are talking like you have a right to drive. First thing you learn is there is no RIGHT it is a privlage. And a thinker would have thought of all the steps all this goes through before saying such thoughtless shit lmao. Think before you speak and the real key is not to think to much or you think to deeply and instead of seeing through you only start seeing passed the objective to the out come. Now think about that for a while ;)
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02 .....Take your own advice ;)
Tactikalguy1 1 month ago
@Tactikalguy1 What advice is that? Not to assume I have all rights to drive a car just cause the keys are in my hand whether I'm ok by law to drive it or otherwise? By the way you're talking I should never be able to get a speeding ticket, DUI, fill out an accident report, if a tail lights out I shouldnt have to fix it. I wish it was that easy lmao My life would be a whole lot easier if that was the case.
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02 .....It would be if you knew the law. Knowing your rights wouldnt hurt either. However, since you believe what you believe, I will not argue with you about your beliefs. As morpheus put it, "Not everyone believes in what I believe in and my beliefs do not require you to."
Tactikalguy1 1 month ago
@Tactikalguy1ahhh lol I know enough about the law to know when not to talk out my ass and say stupid shit when I gotta stand up to them. And I live in kansas and I'm a guy that listens to hard rock with long hair, not a faggot tear in my beer punkass with a crue cut like most these meth head dope fiends and ususally its hard for some one like me to make the law work for me and I do just fine. I know the LAW not what I (meaning you) want to believe as the law. when was the last .
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02 let me rephrase that, have you actually beaten this court case with this bullshit youre trying to feed everyone?.
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02 ....Sounds like you have been to lazy to go through my newest videos and too quick to type. Not just me but many others have won their cases using this bullshit. However, I am sure you wont type anything in the videos where others have won. This is how the word "troll" came into existence.
Tactikalguy1 1 month ago
@Tactikalguy1 LMAO!!!!!!!!!You quote a fictional character in a movie and that is your defense? Show a video of a court ruling or a court room in which you or anyone actually win. Not some paperwork without anyone's name or any written court decision. All you post is some random paperwork and a recording of someone who claims to have won in Cali.....How is it to fail so hard?
brittboyer1 1 month ago
@whiskeydence02 But in the end the state makes and enforces the final outcome of the laws and charges to go along with those laws. Witch means bone head it is in fact a state mater. Once the STATE signs the documents and seal you are in fact legal to prove you have done nothing illegal. If you can do so and you get charged anyway you may then take it to supreme court and they will decide if you have done nothing wrong, sign an appeal and you may fight it there. Good luck :)
whiskeydence02 1 month ago
operatng a motor vehicle on state roads is a privledge, not a right dumbass!
0118bigdawg 1 month ago
If you are on the highways without a license to operate a motor vehicle, then you are subject to laws governing citizenry. Being a citizen. If you are not a citizen, then you can do as you please, as Congress has made it very clear time and time again....
G35Nicholas 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@G35Nicholas And on that note, a dictorial president with birth origin outside the US....
ZeroPermission 1 month ago
Look up Rod Class com, watch some of his videos and listen to his talkshoe, he is using their system to fight and win. He uses their laws and procedures (because they don't follow procedures) against them.
garden333 1 month ago
Herp derp.
cochranexyz 1 month ago
I love the fact that the first thing he posts is that this is not legal advise
That is the only thing that he got right
ArmyReconScout 1 month ago
To the OP. I watched 2 minutes of your ill-informed babble, and closed out the video.
You want to see the contract to which any law applies to you, in any given state whilst in a motor vehicle? You'll need only pull out your drivers license. Because you sir... gasp, get this shit Alfredo, signed the license permitting you on US Highways. There's your legal, including and especially binding contract to which you are obliged.
Idiot.
G35Nicholas 1 month ago 35
@G35Nicholas You sir are so right
MrRUShure 1 month ago
@G35Nicholas pwned!! lol
bjf2008 1 month ago
@G35Nicholas Answer me this then. If one does not sign up for a license of any state, does the legislative laws apply to that person?
A1nitak 1 month ago
@G35Nicholas he should take this vid down, y is it still up? to the dumass who made the vid, u signed the contract to get ur license.... o wait, u sound mexican so nm, so hopefully u just get deported but that prolly won't happen
morderteufel 1 month ago
@G35Nicholas well the problem is the mandatory license is illegal. Where in the constitution does it say I need permission and must surrender my rights to use the public roadways. You show me that.
nerys71 1 month ago 17
@nerys71 Roadways are not mentioned in the constitution. The Roadways are built and maintained by the government and therefore they have a duty and obligation to maintain safety and order there. I'm not a constitutional lawyer but I'd imagine it would fall under the general well being of citizens. Part of this is requiring a license for operating a motor vehicle which incorrectly used can be a weapon. Part of this also is having laws in place for operating those vehicles.
Chess83 1 month ago
@nerys71 Driving is a privilege, not a right. Read your drivers manual and the paperwork you signed to get your license and you'll probably read some important legal jargon that proves your video invalid and utterly pointless
natebob365 1 month ago
the constitution and state laws are 2 completely different things you idiot
420991 1 month ago
@420991 Absolutely NO state law or local law or any other law may "violate" the constitution. the only way to supercede the constitution is via a constitutional amendment. Period.
nerys71 1 month ago
@nerys71 Just to piggy back on this, It is Article 3 of constitution that states that anything conflicting with federal law is not withstanding if I am not mistaken. It get's tricky when you talk about equity law because it is a states version of common law to loosen the rigor of the constitution and any treaties in effect.
1985dctp 1 month ago
@nerys71 sorry where in the constitution are you given the rights to drive @ all? That is why you need a license. Driving is a privilege not a right. Learn the law.
007sephiroth1 1 month ago
@007sephiroth1 You learn the law. The Institution guarantees the "right to travel". It is a right not a privilege. Here let me be more helpful to you than your rude comment was here. Google "Badernik Constitution Classes."
jrc3ky 1 month ago
@nerys71 hey dumbass what kind of cars and public highways were in use when the constitution was written
jons2000ultra 1 month ago
@jons2000ultra dirt and gravel and brick roadways and horse and buggies for cars. anything else dumbass ?
nerys71 1 month ago
@nerys71 It gives the corporation of the US the right to require licences of their employees.
jrc3ky 1 month ago
@nerys71 exactly. Technically, those are OUR roads for the peoples FREE use. OUR taxes paid for them. FUCKING COPS ARE RETARDED OR WHAT??
edwinr360 1 month ago
@nerys71 You can legally use public roadways without a license all day long...as long as you're walking or riding a bike. BUT, operating a motor vehicle on public roadways (the construction and maintenance of which is governement-funded) requires a valid drivers license, among other things. The license is only mandatory if you wish to enjoy the *privilege* (not a right) of driving a car on those roadways.
wshester 1 month ago 6
@wshester SCOTUS has stated that we have a right to use of the public roadways and we have a right to do so via any common conveyance of the time.
The automobile is the most common conveyance in history second only to your feet.
it is a RIGHT that has been illegally taken from us and given back under the unlawful perception of a privilege.
My problem is not with licensing. My problem is the onerous ID nature of licensing and the penalties abused that have nothing to do with driving.
nerys71 1 month ago
@wshester Once again. you needed no license or permission to take your horse on the public roadways nor your carriage on the public roadways. The only difference between horse and carriage and your car is the level of mechanization. nothing more. They are perfect analogs.
Your RIGHT to drive has been illegally stripped from you. it is NOT a privilege. it is an illegally denied right.
nerys71 1 month ago
@nerys71 it's a privilege if your STATE LAW says it's only a privilege. Your state laws are put together under the same constitutional rights that you think you have. Your state legislatures have the RIGHT (under the constitution) to make laws that they see fit that will be best for the state. You forget that the constitution you use is the same they use and with the help of attorneys, they find the loopholes in the constitution since most of it is up to interpretation like the words in a
notaroundme 3 weeks ago
@notaroundme no its the same one they IGNORE. I am sorry but facts history and the law support me. Their ignorance of the law and their flat out unlawful activity being "enforceable" via police and courts is not really that different than the mafia enforcing protection schemes with "thugs" and baseball bats.
Just as illegal except this one is worse as its abused under the color of law.
nerys71 3 weeks ago
@nerys71 so now what. What is your plan to make it different?
notaroundme 3 weeks ago
@notaroundme well I don't have an army that can put down the unlawful governments so I only have the weapon we all have. Education and Communication. Educate enough people to care and change "WILL" happen.
All I can do is try. until then like the helpless store owner in history I PAY the protection money because the thug will use his bat if I don't
nerys71 3 weeks ago
@nerys71 well, good luck to us.
notaroundme 3 weeks ago
@nerys71 bible
notaroundme 3 weeks ago
@wshester Oh really? The Supreme Court disagrees. "The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579. Do your research before posting false information. Thanks.
Blahbiggs2 4 weeks ago