Bigfoot doesn't allow anyone to get too close. If by chance one does shoo tone with a tranquilizer dart, do you think it's mates will be so understanding? I read a report which resulted in tragic consequences!
all he needs is an infrared camera right??? they they wouldnt loose the fucker in the woods. and whats that dick looking through binoculars for?? ITS A FOREST!!
The only thing I don't get is, if he is real, why can they always find fresh tracks but.. no bones, no hair... no ruffled foliage, no trees he rubbed up against... no kill or remnants of a meal... no 2nd footprint leading in a direction... I'll say this either there is some shitty story telling goin on or there are some really horrible scientists on the case.
Actually there has been alot of hair sample collected in the past. They have found snapped saplings and half eatten animals found, even droppings. And for the footprint trails, there are many cases where trails of prints have been followed for up to miles but often the change in terraine (Rocky, hard earth, water)has caused the tracks to end.
It is not that there are horrible scientists. Animal studies is based on classifying animals with others of its kind. But how do you classify a species when you have no other species to compare it to? Sasquatch is niether man, lemur nor ape. So how does one classify Sasquatch, Yeren, Yeh Teh, Yowie, Skunk Apes, Almasty and the others?? We can not. Some scientists feel if we have no physical creature to study nor creature to compare it, it must not be real, leaves no room for wonder.
Animals that die in the forest are rarely encountered by people. Even common animals. Uncommon animals like bears and great apes, which live where their bones are unlikely to be preserved or left alone for long, are practically unrecorded in zoolalogical records as corpuses found in the wild. It only takes a week before even the bones are almost gone in some places and even in sparse and cold areas things disapear very quickly. For something as rare as a bigfoot a corpse will never be found.
ewhssucks has a great point about the dead as it is almost impossible to find animal bones, even in the plains, much less the forest. This doesn't even to begin the debate of how human they are as they could easily bury the dead or die in some hidden area like many other animals do.
We have found many samples of hair that belong to no known animal but they have nothing to compare it to meaning it could be any undiscovered animal, not necessarily Bigfoot. Most of the DNA is contaminated as well.
I saw bigfoot: he was a rummaging through my garbage! I'm gonna teach that hairy son of a bitch to vandalize my trash. Racoons my ass!
MrAnubis89 1 year ago
Bigfoot doesn't allow anyone to get too close. If by chance one does shoo tone with a tranquilizer dart, do you think it's mates will be so understanding? I read a report which resulted in tragic consequences!
erwintommy 2 years ago
meh thats not so hard 2 believe if homoerectus were found to be alive in clusters in china a few years ago (like 80 years ago)
HeLpErNaThAn 2 years ago
I would crap me pants if I see him!
Blaxhorr 2 years ago
More !!!!!
TamanthaWoods 2 years ago
use a tranqualiza dart ( sorry about the spelling
ormesam 2 years ago
Why doesn't someone just shoot bigfoot? That way we have a body to study.
MrPhilJC123 2 years ago
but whats the point of shooting it if it may be 1 of a kind the only one left too risky
supermario8745 2 years ago
if there's only one, he's probably dead since sightings go way back i think.
Ciscommander 2 years ago
I'm sick of bigfoot. They come here illegally, take our women and our jobs and leave us with shitty videos.
klugelschreiber 2 years ago 10
Those are immigrants, you moron
ToraQueen 2 years ago
he was making a joke
TheMetalagro 2 years ago
They're called Mexicans!
JohnTheDrummer88 2 years ago
OMG, That was funny!!
dstars54 2 years ago
They call themselves "latinos", but they usually do not use large shoes!!! :)
KronprinzAdam 2 years ago
@klugelschreiber shut up idiot!
raptor6987 8 months ago
scary creatures
frangipani1974 2 years ago
im over bigfoot. he needs to get a job.
damn sasquach
RipJack645 3 years ago 3
the image is the rogerpaterson vid
godzillaislarge 3 years ago
i mean, the best image is the roger patterson vid
godzillaislarge 3 years ago
wasnt that proven to be fake
supermario8745 2 years ago
if you want to fine him put him on chilld support lmao
tonytherock 3 years ago
all he needs is an infrared camera right??? they they wouldnt loose the fucker in the woods. and whats that dick looking through binoculars for?? ITS A FOREST!!
darnpanda 3 years ago
The only thing I don't get is, if he is real, why can they always find fresh tracks but.. no bones, no hair... no ruffled foliage, no trees he rubbed up against... no kill or remnants of a meal... no 2nd footprint leading in a direction... I'll say this either there is some shitty story telling goin on or there are some really horrible scientists on the case.
Grovesie26 3 years ago
Actually there has been alot of hair sample collected in the past. They have found snapped saplings and half eatten animals found, even droppings. And for the footprint trails, there are many cases where trails of prints have been followed for up to miles but often the change in terraine (Rocky, hard earth, water)has caused the tracks to end.
thesagebrushkid 3 years ago 4
Good Question, good answer.
StorytellerMedia 3 years ago
It is not that there are horrible scientists. Animal studies is based on classifying animals with others of its kind. But how do you classify a species when you have no other species to compare it to? Sasquatch is niether man, lemur nor ape. So how does one classify Sasquatch, Yeren, Yeh Teh, Yowie, Skunk Apes, Almasty and the others?? We can not. Some scientists feel if we have no physical creature to study nor creature to compare it, it must not be real, leaves no room for wonder.
thesagebrushkid 3 years ago
Animals that die in the forest are rarely encountered by people. Even common animals. Uncommon animals like bears and great apes, which live where their bones are unlikely to be preserved or left alone for long, are practically unrecorded in zoolalogical records as corpuses found in the wild. It only takes a week before even the bones are almost gone in some places and even in sparse and cold areas things disapear very quickly. For something as rare as a bigfoot a corpse will never be found.
ewhssucks 3 years ago 5
ewhssucks has a great point about the dead as it is almost impossible to find animal bones, even in the plains, much less the forest. This doesn't even to begin the debate of how human they are as they could easily bury the dead or die in some hidden area like many other animals do.
We have found many samples of hair that belong to no known animal but they have nothing to compare it to meaning it could be any undiscovered animal, not necessarily Bigfoot. Most of the DNA is contaminated as well.
Pyrokanetis 3 years ago 3
wtf is up with all the 3 min videos good god
kstsfx 4 years ago 2
I think big foot is real
terranterrior12345 4 years ago 4
agree
Paganist666 4 years ago 2
me to!
wolfpaw999 4 years ago
i dont...
terminoob 3 years ago
me three
hogwash2nd 3 years ago 2
hahahah i see a big foo in my backyard he looks like monkey boy our gardener buwahahaha
queenamidala888 4 years ago
hahahaha
its that damn sasquatch biatch!!!!
jackboy360 4 years ago
Nice!! anybody know the triphop song at the begginin'??
MounDoGG 4 years ago