Added: 4 years ago
From: SisterMaryLitigation
Views: 10,846
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Judge Martha Anderson is a wonderful judge but we all have our breaking points when it comes to CRAZY litigants. The video speaks for itself and demonstrates that Karen Stephens "SisterMaryLitigation" needs a reality check. I applaud Judge Anderson for refusing to allow the litigant to waste our precious judicial resources.

    Paul Nicoletti

  • Judge Anderson looks just like my teacher Mrs. Walsh that I had back in the 8th grade with blonde hair LOL

  • Love how the judge got so pissed LOL

  • lets take a select 2.5 minute video clip scolding a woman for wasting the court's time and jump to conclusions that the bitch judge is an evil demon goddess from hell and the angry shrill of a litigant is a poor abused defenseless woman just trying to prove her case.

    LOL! Some of you fucktards attacking the judge after seeing a select 2 minute video are such losers. Get a life because there's so much more to this issue than what's presented here. Judgemental bastards.

  • SEE the LINK to the transcript under SHOW MORE under the video

    Attorney Paul Nicoletti obtained a PPO in Judge Martha's court prohibiting his 2 scammed, female clients: Dreilich and Stephens from associating, including attending church or court together.

    Martha Anderson had Marie Dreilich jailed 2x for a total of 8 days. See the bizarre, lawless transcript under SHOW MORE

  • This is not "your courtroom," Martha. Our tax dollars are paying for you to be there.

  • Martha DAMIANI Anderson also Granted Paul Nicoletti's PPO against Marie Dreilich based on perjury and fraud. Ultimately Martha had Marie Jailed 2x for a total of 8 days because the PPO forbids Karen and Marie from attending court or church together even in the absence of Nicoletti. Marie was jailed for accompanying Karen to Judge McDonald's court where he and Nicoletti apparently took bribes.

  • Very hateful and spiteful, maybe it would be in the best interest of the general public if she was removed from the bench and only allowed to work as a lawyer in the future. It seems to me as if she thinks she is above the law with respect to this person before her court. Don;t don't alot of law but seems as if due process for equal rights before the court were not given by this judge.

  • Denial of Due Process. No Order to appeal = EXTORTION !

  • The underlying story is that Hon. Martha DAMIANI Anderson is not a happy camper because the attorney Paul Nicoletti filed a perjured Personal Protection Petition against his female former client. The Judge Denied it, but did NOT address the obvious perjury and the fact that this same attorney also obtained Personal Protection Order against another female client involving the same culprit, Viviano, in both female’s cases, whom they discovered Nicoletti was also representing as Pio Masonry .

  • Most judges can't stand it when you represent yourself. She didn't have to be so hateful though.

  • I sure wish I had Judge Anderson in my court case.

  • How could someone ask for relief from a PPO when a PPO has not been issued?

    This woman IS wasting the courts time with this motion. If I were the judge, I would be pissed at this lady also. Its like contesting a speeding ticket before you even get into your car, it just doesnt make sense.

  • I feel bad for this lady because she actually believed she had a case. Not being an attorney, I believed she was misinformed. I thought think that it was cause to be sanctioned by the judge.

  • Hasn't anybody filed a complaint against her with the judicial commission?

  • visit courthouseforumdotcom michigan page. the judge has a history of breaking the law from the bench to benefit attorneys who are before her in their own cases.

    this lawyer Nicoletti also got other ppo's based on perjury and had another scammed female client thrown in jail by this judge and there is a court order where both of Nicoletti, scammed female clients may not attend church or court together.

    crazy judge who is being paid by taxpayers to abuse them

  • What's the story with this judge? Why is she so angry?

  • @ivvio She's angry because this person is waisting her time with a stupid case

  • i was infront of this judge before, she aint shit. she didnt even grant my ppo

  • Judge looks hagard like she did not get a good sleep.

  • @superpencil007 Most judges can't stand it when you represent yourself. She didn't have to be so hateful to her though. she should have went sui juri instead of pro per

    Yeah the judge does look a little rough doesn't she?.

  • Bitchy Judge, there is not enough INFO here

    to tell if who is dumber, the woman or judge.

    Judge is correct, that she should not interrupt

    the judge. Each needs to let the other finish

    their. words.

  • Death before dis-honor your honor.... vigilante justice for this biitch is best

  • a new juicy video about to come out on this witch..... stay tuned. obviously Mad Martha and nicolletti have had some real estate transactions together.... remember what she says about taking up courtroom time in the soon to come video.

  • This lady is terrible, dealt with her before, vote against her whenever possible!

  • Plus, frivolous, unprepared-for events like this waste the court's time. Only right def should cover court costs.

    In addition, I would say Judge Anderson was being MORE than fair in tolerating her rude and contemptuous statement about it being "fixed."

    Such a statement is uncalled for in a formal setting like this, besides being unimaginably stupid on the part of the def. Thank Anderson for her mercy, I'd say.

  • The PPO wasnt signed and wasn't served. There is no case.

    "I have a constitutional right to be heard." Yes, that's what the appearance in the courtroom is about. EVERYONE in a courtroom must defer to the judge, who here was asking the plaintiff not to interrupt. It's good manners forgotten, not consititutional rights that are infringed. And it's on the part of the def, not the judge.

  • Evil

  • she is a scary judge in person....

  • Maybe she , the judge , got ignored by her husband the night before.

  • Nightmare on Highbury Court

    Metrotimes

    See the 2 part story at this online version

  • see parts 1 and 2 of this investigative report mentioning Martha Anderson.

    Do not put spaces. Nicoletti obtained numerous PPO's and never had them served to keep his scammed clients apart. Anderson ordered that Nicoletti's scammed clients cannot go to church or court together

  • So far all the carpers about Anderson have failed to convince the disengaged observer. If the PPO was filed, but the hearing never occured nor the PPO executed it is hard to see on what basis the litigant has to complain - other than offended feelings over the PPO application.

    IF it had gone to hearing, she could have filed a motion for sanctions during it...or so I would think.

    This is a case where home brew cases backfire - I'm sure she could have suited on other basis...

  • There was a 2 pt investigative report published in the Metrotimes search Dreilich Dec 12 07 Pay attention to the fact that Viviano did not have the capacity to sue or collect as a non existent entity, and that the same crooked attorney Nicoletti was also

    representing Viviano and only got the PPOs to keep his scammed clients apart

    Nicoletti submitted perjured complaints to get the PPOs and once these youtubes were uploaded Martha then did a nunc pro tunc and declared them void

  • There was a 2 pt investigative report published re: these cases in the Metrotimesdotcom, search Dreilich Dec 12 07 Pay attention that Viviano did not have the capacity to sue or collect as a non existent entity, and that the same crooked attorney Nicoletti was also representing Viviano and only got the PPOs to keep his scammed clients apart. Nicoletti submitted perjured complaints for the PPOs. Once these youtubes were uploaded Martha did a nunc pro tunc and declared the PPOs void.

  • Get a clue! Judge Anderson was a lot more patient than many judges would have been with such an amateurish, ignorant, time-wasting mess.

    OK, you don't understand the first thing about the practice of law, but you insist on representing yourself anyway. When it turns out badly, the system is fixed - only you understand the true meaning of the law and anyone who disagrees with you is part of the vast conspiracy to hide the truth. Do you believe the same about brain surgery? subatomic physics?

  • The Right to Be Heard is guaranteed by the Right to Counsel, and the Right to ask the Government for Redress of Grievances. Do your research. Google quote Paul Nicoletti" and learn about his bogus PPOs which were never served. Attny was creating false public records, unserved orders, etc. Nicoletti is being sued by 5/3 Bank

  • You don't have a "constitutional right to speak" at will in any courtroom, ever. The judge was right to refuse to hear arguments on the motion for sanctions, and right to impose the $500 penalty for contemptuous behavior.

    That litigant is an idiot.

  • WHO LET THE DAWG OUT?!! Bet she'll be REAL miserable if she finds out her husband is banging a nice young thang! Anderson is a lunatic and is a danger to every person entering her world of hell. She is hideous, rude, ill mannered, and just plain UGLY!!!

  • what a witch who the hell has $500 to give the courts?

  • dammm i got court tomorrow!!!!

  • LOL!

  • Just watch the body language of the B - I - T - C - H Judge

    Luv " I knew this was fixed "

  • Real Story: Nicoletti filed perjured Petitions for PPO's against his scammed female, former clients. Jdg Anderson is livid because the RESPONSE,now a public record, documents corruption in the Anderson court and that Anderson covered up AGAIN, Nicoletti's perjury. Shedid not cite a rule to sanction, just told her pay $500 under threat of contempt ! Abuse of pwr to extct $ is EXTORTION

  • The lady needs help.

  • Where is this Judges Broom.. Someone needs to tell this judge is she asks a question she should allow an opportunity to respond without telling the litigant to shut up.

    The Litigant does have a right to speak.. except in this judges court. I found this at courthouseforum with all the details.

  • oops that is courthouseforum (dot) com and also see clr at clr dot org THEN click on Information Wanted Michigan as CLR is looking for information on Honorable Martha D Anderson

  • see more of the story at courthouse (dot) com

  • Attny Nicoletti filed his perjured Petitions for PPO's in the incorrect county. Judge Martha Anderson does not even have jurisdiciton. Nicoletti filed in Oakland because he clerked there and was part of the "family" PPO Petitions must be filed in the county where the Respondent resides.

  • The Nicoletti PPO Petititon was full of perjury as there was no stalking, or threats, much less the 2 non-consecutive events required by law. The Nicoletti intent was to create a false public record with his frivolous and vexatious claims.

    MCR 2.114 (F) and MCR 2.625 (A) (1) (2) as provided by MCL 600.2591; MSA 27A 2591

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more