I don't know that Neutron Stars would create a Black Hole if they collided. Sure, Gamma Rays usually do signal when a Black Hole has been or is being formed but from what I know, Black Holes are formed from hypernovas.
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
guys correct me if im wrong but there's actually energy being created by fusion in a neutron star right? when the protons and electrons merge together and become neutrons
@selraith123 the energy is not due to conventional fusion. Neutron stars are fueled by the fluctuation between high then low energy quantum states due to neutron degeneracy pressure.
I've read this would more likely create a carbon star and not a black hole if two neutrons collide..............
Random fact: in 100trillion years there will be no hydrogen stars and the universe will be at absolute zero in teperature.....except where carbon stars are
Carbon star? A neutron star has so much gravity that the weak nuclear force gives way and only the strong nuclear force keeps to star up. Weird thing is, the more mass the smaller the star at this point. So either the two stars would collapse into a black hole if the strong nuclear force gave way, or would become a single, smaller star.
neutron stars colliding are like people. if one adult an a child grab arms and spin each other, the child would spin and the adult would be stationary. this is what the sun does to earth. but, if there were two people of equal strength doing this, there would be a point when they would both be spinning, thus simulating the neutron star.
Say that a gamma-ray-burst from a hypernova 100 lightyears away from us, is heading towards the earth. The results would be dramatic. The entire planet would be sterile so to speak.
However, if gamma-rays travel at the speed of light, there would be no way for us to predict it before it hits us, right?
So thats every reason to start living right now! :)
the chances of it being pointed directly at us are slim though. and if a hypernova occurs within 100 light years of us, a grb would be the least of our worries ;D
thats how lenses work. uses Bose-Einstein Condensate they have slowed photons of light down to something like 30 MPH. i've heard they can even stop them but would have to read up
well truly u are a person who loves this science. I can see that as u exude a special passion for it. thats great "love what you do." I guess i should expect great things from you. take care dude.....
hey im no science guru but someone respond to this if it makes sense: the sun is a giant neclear reactor, in such a place fission takes place. protons and neutrons collide resulting in neutrons being formed (assuming). Now, if the sun were to run out of fuel would it not turn into a neutron star, and because of its size and the fact that neutron stars have a great gravitational pull, could it pull all of the planets into its mass resulting in the collapse of our solar system.
First of all, fusion is occuring in the sun not fission. Secondly, the sun does not have enough gravity for degenerate nuetron pressure to even occur-the sun will not become a nuetron star. The sun only has enough mass to become a white dwarf. Even with all the mass the sun has-just bc it evolves into a more dense object deosn't mean its gravitional pull on satellite objects becomes greater-no mass is created. Any basic atronomy book which involves basic algebra can explain this in great detail
thanks for the information, lol......u must think im a total science noob......and yes i am...but this caught mu interest. Are you one of those involved in the science of the stars and if so do u enjoy it?
I'm a chemical physicist(Ph.D graduate student). I've taken General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Classical Mechanics, Astrophysics, ect.... . Yes I find theoretical physics highly enjoyable once you understand the abstract math. However, you dont have to be educated in advanced mathematics or physics to enjoy extreme astronomy in general. There exist a plethora of books for the average audience(non science) to enjoy the basic conclusions and theories in physics. It's a facinating field.
chemical physicist...what exactly do you do. Sounds really advance and Ph.D as well, u seem to be a scholarly person. Do you post your articles/findings on the web that i can read some of your content?
Scholarly.... well not really. I'm about as average as they come. Chemical physics/physical chemistry is the application of Quantum Mechanics(relavistic & non-relavistic), Thermodynamics, Statistical Mechanics, Kinetics, Electrodynamics, Molecular Dynamics(Classical Mechanics) and Mathematics(group theory, operators,... ) to understand and predict chemical dynamics. The majority of is mathematical and encompasses advanced physics. Just to clarify I'm a graduate student working on my Ph.D.
Does anyone have any idea of the orbital velocity (around the common centre of gravity) of an average-sized neutron binary just before they coalesce? It would save me trying to work it out...
LOL hmm, perhaps, being a human being over the age of 5 (and british) I am more than well aware of the cultural significance, and my apparent ignorance was (perhaps) an attempt to ridicule sure a piss-poor attempt at humour.
It might have been funny if there was a mention in the book of colliding neutron stars, but there isn't, so it wasn't.
Now, can you answer my legitimate question please you obtuse cuntflap?
Attempting piss poor humour through the medium of written text is never wise, as you have so deftly demonstrated.
And you further demonstrate childish behaviour by reverting to body-part insults. As such, you are not worth my time. Perhaps when you mature a little you will understand.
Hey BarleyPrincess, have you seen a video clip of the collision of a star like the Sun and a blue star, both still burning hydrogen? The sound and everything is cool. Although the blue star is smaller, and stars don't come to an end when they collide if both are still burning hydrogen. The real results are less interesting. Although not coming to an end gives stars 100+ times the mass of the Sun a chance to form. Anyways, have you seen that clip of 2 colliding young stars?
The gamma radiation that the Americans thought came from Russians testing bombs on the dark side of the moon, was eventually discovered to be radiation eminating from supernovas on the edge of our universe. We can detect these explosions when the gamma radiation eminating from either the top or bottom of the star cosses paths with the earth. Neutron stars were the initial thoery but were disproved.
That is wrong, it is because of it's gravity it weights so much. 1mg does not weigh as much as you're reffering to. Get your facts right, and yes, it does weight quite a lot actually.
Correct. Which the discovery of these pulsars, America nearly went to stage one red alert because they thought Russians were testing nuclear bombs in space.
A gamma ray burst is the brightest, most luminous even in the universe since the big bang. They are created when matter is warped into energy from the spin and gravitational pull of black holes. If one of these ever hit earth, it would end all life as we know it.
there are about 400 gamma ray bursts a year, but they happen in a millisecond or several minutes, only you can see the afterglow or its light from earth by telescope(must have a very strong telescope), you need hubble to really see it, maybe one day hubble will get a lucky hit at an gamma ray "line"
AKA, a medium... but no there is no sound in space. It's energy in the form of Xrays, which is a form of light that is then compressed or transformed into sound... not during. It's a quite complicated process if you want to get technical but rest assured, in space no-one can hear you scream... even if you're dying right next to your partner :P
AKA, a medium... but no there is no sound in space. It's energy in the form of Xrays, which is a form of light that is then compressed or transformed into sound... not during. It's a quite complicated process if you want to get technical but rest assured, in space no-one can hear you scream... even if you're dying right next to your partner :P
so the two neutron stars collide but the mass combined is too big for a neutron star to be stable. its mass is too great and gravity takes over and it collapses inward indefinately untill it disappears altogether leaving nothing but a scource of gravity so strong not even light can escape. space is wierd :\
That's an unproven theory actually. If black holes exist there is no way we can know if they have 'infinite' density or not. Just because they can compact the neutrons does not mean they can compact them to an infinite density. We know extremely little about black holes.
3 times a second (3 Hz) for a rotational period is pretty slow. Some neutron stars have a rotational period of kilohertz (1000+ rotations per second) there are some sites on the net that have taken the frequency emmissions and converted them into an audio signal, go listen,
take a prtion from the size of a pinhead it would weight over 1.000.000 Tonns(the density is about 1012 kg/cm3 an more!!) imagine landing on that thing ^^ u would be crushed in a second^^
Wow, imagine the force of something like that. The pressure at the core of the resulting neutron star. Something that size spinning around 3 times every second.
im learning about stars haha and i have a question? cant the two stars also combine into 1 huge star?
D4NI3LGONZALEZZ 3 months ago
I don't know that Neutron Stars would create a Black Hole if they collided. Sure, Gamma Rays usually do signal when a Black Hole has been or is being formed but from what I know, Black Holes are formed from hypernovas.
GatorFreak100 3 months ago
Ok. The universe scares me more than the exorcist, the ring, the grudge and the zombies at the same time.
futiniano 8 months ago
chuck norris packs more power in one finger.
sadathusain 9 months ago 2
is this an animation cause it almost looks like one even so it still looks cool
canikostar99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
narragansettharco 1 year ago
i was searching. you were on a mission. then our hearts COMBINED like a NEUTRON STAR COLLISION. :)
MrsTwilightAddict10 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
O.o
/¯/___________________________
| IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZAH
\_\¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
guitarhero2211 1 year ago
guys correct me if im wrong but there's actually energy being created by fusion in a neutron star right? when the protons and electrons merge together and become neutrons
selraith123 1 year ago
@selraith123 the energy is not due to conventional fusion. Neutron stars are fueled by the fluctuation between high then low energy quantum states due to neutron degeneracy pressure.
DieFatorLiveThin 1 year ago
And this if GRB... hopefully not aimed to Earth
wexoni 1 year ago
Ooooh, purty *dazed smile*
Paterson212 1 year ago
I've read this would more likely create a carbon star and not a black hole if two neutrons collide..............
Random fact: in 100trillion years there will be no hydrogen stars and the universe will be at absolute zero in teperature.....except where carbon stars are
thecheaterdude 2 years ago
@thecheaterdude
Carbon star? A neutron star has so much gravity that the weak nuclear force gives way and only the strong nuclear force keeps to star up. Weird thing is, the more mass the smaller the star at this point. So either the two stars would collapse into a black hole if the strong nuclear force gave way, or would become a single, smaller star.
Forrester 1 year ago
@Forrester true, if black holes merge together the strong GWs will rip things into pieces and turn them ''upside down''
lapfuwong 1 year ago
OK, it might be unlikely to happen, but what would it look like if 100, or even 1000 of these things collided at once?
tyebillion 2 years ago
well you have just created the fantasy of my suicide.
legitimateJunkiee 2 years ago
wont the gravity and density from a neutron star just rip bothe of them apart befor they colide?
cladiax1 2 years ago
neutron stars colliding are like people. if one adult an a child grab arms and spin each other, the child would spin and the adult would be stationary. this is what the sun does to earth. but, if there were two people of equal strength doing this, there would be a point when they would both be spinning, thus simulating the neutron star.
poseidonrox95 2 years ago
Say that a gamma-ray-burst from a hypernova 100 lightyears away from us, is heading towards the earth. The results would be dramatic. The entire planet would be sterile so to speak.
However, if gamma-rays travel at the speed of light, there would be no way for us to predict it before it hits us, right?
So thats every reason to start living right now! :)
VafleTheMan 2 years ago
the chances of it being pointed directly at us are slim though. and if a hypernova occurs within 100 light years of us, a grb would be the least of our worries ;D
knowledgeis4me 2 years ago
the gamma rays can also modify our DNA this could upgrade our consciousness!!!
HotRockx 2 years ago
or kill us all :D!
Penguinz13989 2 years ago
@vafle - Just like light though, it only travels at its constant when in a vacuum.
NoSz4 2 years ago
hm... so light travels more slowly in i.e. air? Material should slow down the light? That cannot be true....
mRRRc 1 year ago
Yes it is true, to find out how much you look at the 'refractive index' of a material.
NoSz4 1 year ago
@mRRRc
thats how lenses work. uses Bose-Einstein Condensate they have slowed photons of light down to something like 30 MPH. i've heard they can even stop them but would have to read up
blazednlovinit 1 year ago
do black holes ever dissapear?
if they do, does that mean quasars can dissapear too?
Penguinz13989 2 years ago
Quasars are super massive black holes feeding. And yes, black holes eventually evaporate.
Smurfkiller921 2 years ago
through hawking radiation? that qould take longer than we could calculate
C4nn0nF0dd3r 2 years ago
haha good question
HotRockx 2 years ago
well truly u are a person who loves this science. I can see that as u exude a special passion for it. thats great "love what you do." I guess i should expect great things from you. take care dude.....
BajanCreation 2 years ago
real sucky explosion...
killdozer777 2 years ago
what energy! kaboom new stuff is born
Gatenaut 2 years ago
hey im no science guru but someone respond to this if it makes sense: the sun is a giant neclear reactor, in such a place fission takes place. protons and neutrons collide resulting in neutrons being formed (assuming). Now, if the sun were to run out of fuel would it not turn into a neutron star, and because of its size and the fact that neutron stars have a great gravitational pull, could it pull all of the planets into its mass resulting in the collapse of our solar system.
BajanCreation 2 years ago
First of all, fusion is occuring in the sun not fission. Secondly, the sun does not have enough gravity for degenerate nuetron pressure to even occur-the sun will not become a nuetron star. The sun only has enough mass to become a white dwarf. Even with all the mass the sun has-just bc it evolves into a more dense object deosn't mean its gravitional pull on satellite objects becomes greater-no mass is created. Any basic atronomy book which involves basic algebra can explain this in great detail
1czelaya 2 years ago
Hope that helps.
1czelaya 2 years ago
thanks for the information, lol......u must think im a total science noob......and yes i am...but this caught mu interest. Are you one of those involved in the science of the stars and if so do u enjoy it?
BajanCreation 2 years ago
I'm a chemical physicist(Ph.D graduate student). I've taken General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Classical Mechanics, Astrophysics, ect.... . Yes I find theoretical physics highly enjoyable once you understand the abstract math. However, you dont have to be educated in advanced mathematics or physics to enjoy extreme astronomy in general. There exist a plethora of books for the average audience(non science) to enjoy the basic conclusions and theories in physics. It's a facinating field.
1czelaya 2 years ago
chemical physicist...what exactly do you do. Sounds really advance and Ph.D as well, u seem to be a scholarly person. Do you post your articles/findings on the web that i can read some of your content?
BajanCreation 2 years ago
Scholarly.... well not really. I'm about as average as they come. Chemical physics/physical chemistry is the application of Quantum Mechanics(relavistic & non-relavistic), Thermodynamics, Statistical Mechanics, Kinetics, Electrodynamics, Molecular Dynamics(Classical Mechanics) and Mathematics(group theory, operators,... ) to understand and predict chemical dynamics. The majority of is mathematical and encompasses advanced physics. Just to clarify I'm a graduate student working on my Ph.D.
1czelaya 2 years ago
WTH did you just say? :s
HotRockx 2 years ago
does black hole form from this??
cek100 3 years ago
This is cool.
imma use a clip of it and edit it for my new intro's
JABUUTY671 3 years ago
Does anyone have any idea of the orbital velocity (around the common centre of gravity) of an average-sized neutron binary just before they coalesce? It would save me trying to work it out...
maureenOWW 3 years ago
42.....
muledeer1976 2 years ago
42 what?
maureenOWW 2 years ago
Sigh.
Jarls 2 years ago
42 sigh? Eh? I was wanting a figure in KPH, not annoying ejections of air.
maureenOWW 2 years ago
I was sighing at your apparent naivete regarding the number 42.
Might I suggest a few google searches.
Jarls 2 years ago
LOL hmm, perhaps, being a human being over the age of 5 (and british) I am more than well aware of the cultural significance, and my apparent ignorance was (perhaps) an attempt to ridicule sure a piss-poor attempt at humour.
It might have been funny if there was a mention in the book of colliding neutron stars, but there isn't, so it wasn't.
Now, can you answer my legitimate question please you obtuse cuntflap?
maureenOWW 2 years ago
Attempting piss poor humour through the medium of written text is never wise, as you have so deftly demonstrated.
And you further demonstrate childish behaviour by reverting to body-part insults. As such, you are not worth my time. Perhaps when you mature a little you will understand.
Good day to you.
Jarls 2 years ago
Really, because I found it was quite funny.
Penguinz13989 2 years ago
Hey BarleyPrincess, have you seen a video clip of the collision of a star like the Sun and a blue star, both still burning hydrogen? The sound and everything is cool. Although the blue star is smaller, and stars don't come to an end when they collide if both are still burning hydrogen. The real results are less interesting. Although not coming to an end gives stars 100+ times the mass of the Sun a chance to form. Anyways, have you seen that clip of 2 colliding young stars?
LemmingsMaster 3 years ago
this animation neglects the fact that Neutron Stars spin pretty rapidly
lymph12 3 years ago 9
@lymph12 i thought magnetars don't spin that much? i thought it was only pulsars.
brandeezy108 3 months ago
they dont look like nuclear bombs
dork
pektotyou 3 years ago
The gamma radiation that the Americans thought came from Russians testing bombs on the dark side of the moon, was eventually discovered to be radiation eminating from supernovas on the edge of our universe. We can detect these explosions when the gamma radiation eminating from either the top or bottom of the star cosses paths with the earth. Neutron stars were the initial thoery but were disproved.
markjscottfilms 3 years ago
They haven't been "disproved" that's when they were confirmed. A star that's magnetic poles spin so rapidly due to high levels of density.
FatalFist 3 years ago
Pardon me, it's very complex this subject. :)
markjscottfilms 3 years ago
That is wrong, it is because of it's gravity it weights so much. 1mg does not weigh as much as you're reffering to. Get your facts right, and yes, it does weight quite a lot actually.
madeworld 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NO RESON TO BE A SMART @#$%&*! this is youtube not a scientific buliten!
thebigguns51807 3 years ago
1 mg of the neutron star weights several billion tons
DivBMesa 3 years ago
both mg and a ton are units used to measure mass....CONSTANTS....the X amount of mg always equals Y amount tons
idiot
flip9388 3 years ago
haha, sorry I chose wrong words. I meant that even a pin-sized part of the neutron star weights several billion tons, excuse me
DivBMesa 3 years ago 2
GBR radiation is the same type of radiation from a nuke.
thebigguns51807 4 years ago
Correct. Which the discovery of these pulsars, America nearly went to stage one red alert because they thought Russians were testing nuclear bombs in space.
FatalFist 3 years ago
which is one of the reasons why Nuclear-powered Rockets wern't to be used...event though they were theorised to significantly faster.
ANACONDA360 3 years ago
A gamma ray burst is the brightest, most luminous even in the universe since the big bang. They are created when matter is warped into energy from the spin and gravitational pull of black holes. If one of these ever hit earth, it would end all life as we know it.
mepea09 4 years ago
that was kind of funny to watch. lol i wanna see it again.
vinnypappy 4 years ago
Wow, these must emit gravity waves like a sombitch, assuming gravity waves exist.
majorvoltage 4 years ago
there would be no sound in space though. ;)
any idea as to how long such an event like this takes place?
tiredoftypical 4 years ago
there are about 400 gamma ray bursts a year, but they happen in a millisecond or several minutes, only you can see the afterglow or its light from earth by telescope(must have a very strong telescope), you need hubble to really see it, maybe one day hubble will get a lucky hit at an gamma ray "line"
swordfighter3 4 years ago
Fuck yeah, awesome birth of a black hole right there
AnduinX 4 years ago
or a quark star
swordfighter3 4 years ago
FUCK YA! that was so sic, there should have been sound effects to go with vid
aztrance123 4 years ago
theres no sound in space btw
swordfighter3 4 years ago
I mean for the vid just to make it more interesting. Realy theres no sound in space hmmmm did not know that
aztrance123 4 years ago
theres no sound in space because sound needs air to travel, and theres no air in space
swordfighter3 4 years ago
thats cool
aztrance123 4 years ago
There is sound, just that you need special instruments to hear it....
Lastesina 4 years ago
Swordfighter3: Sound doesn't need air - any matter will do as long as it's dense enough for the wave to move.
korteksi 4 years ago
AKA, a medium... but no there is no sound in space. It's energy in the form of Xrays, which is a form of light that is then compressed or transformed into sound... not during. It's a quite complicated process if you want to get technical but rest assured, in space no-one can hear you scream... even if you're dying right next to your partner :P
FatalFist 3 years ago
AKA, a medium... but no there is no sound in space. It's energy in the form of Xrays, which is a form of light that is then compressed or transformed into sound... not during. It's a quite complicated process if you want to get technical but rest assured, in space no-one can hear you scream... even if you're dying right next to your partner :P
FatalFist 3 years ago
Such an event will release matter as shock waves that affects other matter in their road and our ears happen to be made of matter :-)
But...the impact will not only make your eardrum to move but will also vaporize you!
Iztaru 4 years ago
so the two neutron stars collide but the mass combined is too big for a neutron star to be stable. its mass is too great and gravity takes over and it collapses inward indefinately untill it disappears altogether leaving nothing but a scource of gravity so strong not even light can escape. space is wierd :\
peteq1972 4 years ago
That's an unproven theory actually. If black holes exist there is no way we can know if they have 'infinite' density or not. Just because they can compact the neutrons does not mean they can compact them to an infinite density. We know extremely little about black holes.
AnduinX 4 years ago
Colliding neutron stars reach the speed of light and faster.
Evilshonen 4 years ago
3 times a second (3 Hz) for a rotational period is pretty slow. Some neutron stars have a rotational period of kilohertz (1000+ rotations per second) there are some sites on the net that have taken the frequency emmissions and converted them into an audio signal, go listen,
gordongate 4 years ago
is there anything bigger (explosivly) than a gama ray burst in our universe?
saveyoshot99 4 years ago
no. weve seen then in other galaxies, but its bad news if one goes off in our own galaxy.
peteq1972 4 years ago
400 go off in our galaxy every year(but incredibly rare to hit the earth), watch national geographic to know more abnout this stuff
swordfighter3 4 years ago
a supernova is the biggest known explosions in our galaxy, only the big bang would be the grandaddy of them all...
swordfighter3 4 years ago
I thought a hyper-nova was the biggest.
AnduinX 4 years ago
take a prtion from the size of a pinhead it would weight over 1.000.000 Tonns(the density is about 1012 kg/cm3 an more!!) imagine landing on that thing ^^ u would be crushed in a second^^
goddamitgivemeaname 5 years ago
Wow, imagine the force of something like that. The pressure at the core of the resulting neutron star. Something that size spinning around 3 times every second.
Amazing
Jaredster 5 years ago
well its not that "bigsize" only a diameter of 20km
goddamitgivemeaname 5 years ago
it's not about size. it's about mass and these things weigh a lot. force = mass * velocity
sh3l1 4 years ago
Black holes to a supernova? God, really a big msytery to know the universe.
rogan 5 years ago