there is a big difference between a greenhouse and the greenhouse effect. " greenhouse effect heats the earth because greenhouse gases absorb outgoing radiative energy and re-emit some of it back towards earth."
Unfortunate unless we have a scientist in office we will continue the production of CO2. Since 1860 CO2 has risen by 25% and earth's average temp has increase by .6% and continues to increase. Sure it may not seem to threatening now to many political skeptics but either way there is nothing immoral about trying to play safe weather it's believable or not. I am a skeptic. So far i cant argue with scientific facts nor statistic on the warming of the earth. When in doubt, further you research :D
Global warming is a scam, FACT. There is ZERO evidence for it and much against. The forcing equations of the IPCC are wrong and disagree with empirical evidence. Albedo effect of low lying clouds and the inaccurate estimate of uppertropospheric water vapour and thus outgoing longwave radiation creates NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. The big smoking gun proving the IPCC's cO2 greenhouse theory wrong is the complete absence of mid-tropospheric HOTSPOT!
@IndrasBlade77 What model do you use to explain the sooner than expected fall/collapse of the Larson B shelf? If you say localized warming, what model do you have to explain the cause of said warming?
Even if you don't say localized warming, there is no doubt that localized warming is significant in the polar regions. What model do you use to explain said localized warming?
There is a quick simple solution to global warming. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on by Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. WE NEED IT NOW. The source is deuterium from the World’s Oceans – virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce."..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" See blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post
website “Star Scientific Limited”
Youtube video – “In the Footsteps of Fusion” + youtube channel
there is a big difference between a greenhouse and the greenhouse effect. " greenhouse effect heats the earth because greenhouse gases absorb outgoing radiative energy and re-emit some of it back towards earth."
franKruleR 1 week ago
nice
huma19imdad 1 month ago
He's Russel peters :O
SLRCNetwork 2 months ago 2
best accent ever
LeroyTheNinja 2 months ago
Unfortunate unless we have a scientist in office we will continue the production of CO2. Since 1860 CO2 has risen by 25% and earth's average temp has increase by .6% and continues to increase. Sure it may not seem to threatening now to many political skeptics but either way there is nothing immoral about trying to play safe weather it's believable or not. I am a skeptic. So far i cant argue with scientific facts nor statistic on the warming of the earth. When in doubt, further you research :D
kristinongsiako03 3 months ago
love the vid, love the accent
nick10189 3 months ago
i dnt get what hes saying on the 2nd part
laniasultan 3 months ago
goood thanks
chocolates621 3 months ago
Global warming is a scam, FACT. There is ZERO evidence for it and much against. The forcing equations of the IPCC are wrong and disagree with empirical evidence. Albedo effect of low lying clouds and the inaccurate estimate of uppertropospheric water vapour and thus outgoing longwave radiation creates NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. The big smoking gun proving the IPCC's cO2 greenhouse theory wrong is the complete absence of mid-tropospheric HOTSPOT!
IndrasBlade77 4 months ago
@IndrasBlade77 What model do you use to explain the sooner than expected fall/collapse of the Larson B shelf? If you say localized warming, what model do you have to explain the cause of said warming?
Even if you don't say localized warming, there is no doubt that localized warming is significant in the polar regions. What model do you use to explain said localized warming?
Decktrio 3 months ago
@IndrasBlade77 satelite images don't lie, they show holes in the ozone that are actually getting bigger.
TheGeoffrey0 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a quick simple solution to global warming. It is called Muon Catalysed Fusion. As worked on by Star Scientific. NO CO2. NO Greenhouse Gases. NO Toxic Waste. WE NEED IT NOW. The source is deuterium from the World’s Oceans – virtually limitless. It is cheap to produce."..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" See blog "the Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post
website “Star Scientific Limited”
Youtube video – “In the Footsteps of Fusion” + youtube channel
2110kop 6 months ago
nice but the voice over is kindly weird heheh
gmsalas29 9 months ago
good work :))))))))))
henrindreca 10 months ago
topic well explained!! with lajawab indian accent!!thanks merination
fjkfi9ejd 1 year ago