@UppruniTegundanna Because something can't come from nothing, I believe in god. We already know the universe didn't exist forever, so there had to be something else existing forever. With scientists attempting to find out what happened before the singularity, we're trying to find out what happened before the beginning, which doesn't make sense,
@coolhoowip It's not clear that "nothing" in the Platonic sense of "absolute nothingness" is a valid concept. Even in perfect vacuums, we detect so-called "virtual particles" coming into existence and then disappearing from, apparently, nothing.
Viewing the world at the quantum level already plays absolute havoc with our sense of causality and time, so speculating about the cause of the universe using our intuitive, everyday notion of causality is unlikely to give us the right answer.
@coolhoowip Currently our model of the universe can be traced back to the Singularity, which is the state of the universe after one unit of Planck time. Planck units are the smallest units of measurement that make physical sense in the universe: you can't have half a Planck time. The upshot of this is that there is no possible measurement "before" Planck time 1 that isn't zero. To solve this conundrum, we must attempt to make sense of something that could have caused universal time to being.
@coolhoowip And when I say "make sense of" I really do mean "sense" - it must be an explanation that is based on properly accumulated evidence rather than speculation.
@coolhoowip I wouldn't agree with this either: there are some people (incidentally, this trait is only found among women), who are tetrachromatic, which means that they see the world through four base colours, rather than the normal three. Are they seeing more accurately than us? Are they seeing perfectly? No!
The problem with your line of argument is that you are treating our human senses as though they are the special standard for perceiving the world around us. This is not true... (cont'd)
... Our senses do not offer us a completely transparent window onto the world: they offer us a servicable window that works to give us the kind of information that we (as humans) need to survive in our natural state: i.e. as primates living in nature.
We can't directly see that matter is composed mostly of nothing (which it is), and we can't directly see that we are made of atoms, even though both of these things have been verified as true via machines that allow us to see at higher resolution.
@coolhoowip If you treat everything that falls outside of our naked senses as a black hole of mystery that can be filled with whatever entities you imagine might be there, you not only give yourself the impression that you have answers when you really don't, but you keep yourself restricted to a very narrow band of perception. We not only see, hear, taste smell and feel, but we also penetrate deep into matter and far out into space using extensions of our senses that we have built ourselves.
@strokesfan1107 God could be governed by laws that aren't physical and in another dimension. We can smell, see, hear, feel, and taste. If everyone was deaf, then we would all believe that sound doesn't exist. There could be some other sense that god has that we don't have. There are infinite possibilities for what could be in reality. Like the beginning of the video, there was nothing. That "nothing" could be something that we can't detect as humans. I believe in a god since science supports it.
@coolhoowip Science doesn't really support your claim that he isn't governed by our universes physical laws at all, as science's objective is to better understand the universe, not just throw in the towel and say "well we can't explain it, so God did it. As for your theory on "if everyone were deaf we'd assume there was no sound" it simply isn't true as there are low frequency sounds no human can hear but thanks to science we have built devices to listen for them.
@coolhoowip Sound is just the regular movement of air particles, which we can detect without ears. Deaf people even have raves. There are senses that other animals have that we don't, such as electroreception and echolocation; but we have built machines that allow us to "see" what creatures like monotremes and bats can perceive. We also know now that only the tiniest fraction of the elecromagnetic spectrum is visible to us - yet we have the technology to detect the extremes of the spectrum.
@IdrealMari If so, then God is governed by the physical laws and forces which took place here. Either that, or God has not interfered with said laws since the Universe was set in motion.
As Hawking puts it "Could God create a rock so large that even he himself could not pick it up?"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@sritger SHUT UP, YOU FUCKING RACIST! ALL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE POINTS TO ONE THING, GOD! THERE IS NO EVOLUTION, NO BIG BANG, GOD CREATED OUR WORLD AND US! AND HE'S NOT A GUY ON A CLOUD THAT KILLS PEOPLE! HE'S A LOVING, CARING, SACRIFICING, ALL POWERFUL DIETY! READ THE BIBLE YOU DICK!
There's this video "People Are Awesome" where some guys do stunts on rollerskates and stuff. It's quite cool, but I think this is billions of times more awesome.
i remember watching this documentary. my 8th science teacher showed this to my class. the universe or multiverse is considered the largest chain reaction of all (rube goldberg do not exist in this area)
First, Rube Goldberg machines are specifically designed by someone. The universe was not designed.
Second, Rube Goldberg machines are designed to be as unnecessarily complex as possible to achieve an utterly trivial result. The universe is the most efficient machine in existence and the results achieved are anything but trivial.
The universe itself is the Rube Goldberg machine my friend, because everything depicted in the video happened so you could be sitting today on your chair asking that question :)
@Piersmaru ahem "•Goldberg: United States cartoonist who drew intricate diagrams of very complicated and impractical contraptions that accomplished little or nothing (1883-1970)." I'm fairly sure the creation of the universe shouldn't labeled as "little or nothing."
@Piersmaru ''everything depicted in the video happened so you could be sitting today on your chair asking that question :)''
A bit pretension, isn't it? To imagine that the whole universe went about the it did IN ORDER THAT someone could contemplate it? Better to say that we could not have been here if the universe hadn't gone about that way.
i used to not believe in god, but the more i have learned about the world around me, the more i am amazed. god wanted us to have the mind of a child, always open and fascinated by the world around us. we are meant to treat everyday as a wonderous new day. this trait has allowed us to push forward and understand more and more. to truly understand gods work.
there are similarities between the bible and physics. For example, god is light and created the universe from nothing. energy is essentially waves in the fabric of space wich is nothing, and matter is bundles of light energy bound together. matter is made from nothing. we came from nothing. we have no fucking idea what is going on so please atheists, be a little more open to religion. you think god would explain evolution in the bible? early man wouldnt understand so its simplified.
@heyshutupyou Why are you specific to the god of the bible? This clearly shows that you are biased towards one man-made religious text. How come you haven't replaced the bible with the qu`ron? Might this be the result of an environmental factor? Cultural maybe? Leave the bible out of it when you're addressing atheists, because it's fairly easy to spot your BS. Right away, we're going to argue on why we should give you special attention rather than your fellow man who also has similar beliefs.
"there are similarities between the bible and physics" - good one. Bibles perception of physics is about as good as that of a 5 year old child. By cherry picking couple of statements that vaguely relate to some of our understanding of physics you conveniently omit the crap load of obvious blunders.
BibleSceince 101:Flat earth, sun rotates around earth, no rain or rainbows with water present, animals can fly and talk, disease caused by demons, dinosours and humans coexisted, etc...
A wonderful fantasy. Great comfort indeed for anyone who wishes to deny He who is responsible for it all, and conveniently any consequential obligation to Him (which is ultimately what it has always been about).
It is as much a leap of faith, and in fact a less reasonable one, for the atheist to believe that all came from nothing than it is for the theist to acknowledge that there is only One without cause: God.
@1ndabag ''A wonderful fantasy. Great comfort indeed for anyone who wishes to deny He who is responsible for it all, and conveniently any consequential obligation to Him (which is ultimately what it has always been about).''
@cayetanoluis This video is not an argument of science over god at best its an argument oer science over creationism. Science has never seeked to disprove the exsistence of God it is simply the search for truth. Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds in the history of mankind was also a trong believer in god. This video makes me believe in god more not less. The sheer scope of both size and time makes it hard to imagine there isn't a higher purpose to it all.
@Sacorian ''Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds in the history of mankind was also a trong believer in god. This video makes me believe in god more not less.''
The ''God'' you're talking about isn't the one Einstein believed in. He rejected as childish and absurd a purpose driven God. And no, it isn't hard to imagine there isn't a higher purpose. Just pay attention to what the science actually SAYS, rather than what you want to read into it for emotional reasons.
@Sacorian I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. - Einstein
I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings. - Einstein
@1ndabag ''It is as much a leap of faith, and in fact a less reasonable one, for the atheist to believe that all came from nothing than it is for the theist to acknowledge that there is only One without cause: God.''
Nup. The greater leap of faith is to assume that a causeless being (with a consciousness!) is the cause of the universe, rather than to assume that the universe didn't require a cause. SOMETHING didn't require a cause, so let's cut out the useless deity.
I'm sorry but believing in a God that thinks slavery and beating your wife is cool, is definitely not smart enough to create the universe in such perfect design.
There is no why, only a how. In knowing the how, we may actuate a set of circumstances that we find desirable. It is science that gives us the tools to that end. I would use science to banish privation, greed, crime, war, bigotry and disease to merely passages in history books. Please watch my featured video and participate to help support the advancement of science.
The universe was never "NOTHING"... Why would people make this assumption? The universe should be assumed to be eternal though the depth of it's process is close to unfathomable... For me it is difficult to understand how the process continues despite entropy though our understanding is very limited...
@b74k3 Because, ultimately, all things must exist in a given state. No matter how rare a given state is, a set of energy and matter must have one state at any one given time. You and I, and all our fellow humans, exist here because this is how our stellar and biological evolution took place. It is, I agree, a wholly insufficient answer, but, nevertheless, it is the truth...and so it must be enough. :)
@b74k3 I think the question is why did this one end up with us. Either by Divine Engineering or by Cosmic Fluke either one is unmeasurably mind boggling to fathom. If you believe it was created by the will of a being how ever great he/she/they are then its a design of unfathomable precision. If you believe life to be a cosmic fluke then the Idea that 4billion years of random occurences formed an unbroken string of random circumstance up the point where the fluke of life was even possible.
How can you believe in any religion when you've got more logical evidence of 'how is all happened' than you would in the bible, koran, ect.? Merely a fantasy book created by man.
The role of science is to sniff out the mathematical quantities that support models... No doubt we can add wrinkles to this model here, but it shows science is very capable of providing us with wrinkles. What it doesn't often do, is take a look back and look at the beauty of the steps... It's what we as humans can add to the universe, reverse engineer it and observe. No universe exists if noone can sense it ;) and screw religion, observation itself is innately spiritual. Making up stuff isn't.
I think I'll start uploading my videos to Megaupload for people to download if they want. If you go to my channel page, you'll find the link to the Ultimate Rube Goldberg Machine in my channel description. The rest will follow...
@steveo20007 I'm not so sure it is dude. Let's be clear I'm not starting another Science Versus Religeon debate with you. but IF the universe truly WAS created by a divine being in a mere 6 days that WOULD be cooler still....its the Fire principle....Man finds a fire by chance (caused by lightning probably) that's pretty awesome. But man MAKES fire that's even cooler. I admit my analogy is a little shaky hopefully you get my meaning though.
@Sacorian Or maybe life was inevitable, because it is so simple...
And the result isn't us, we're like the earliest mammals or the dinosaurs. We don't know what we will ultimately become. (Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy had a fun twist on what our purpose is)
I don't quite understand the title of this video.. i know a rube goldberg machine is something over-engineered etc, but you're video suggests why bother making matter and going through a lengthy process when something could just "be"... like the way creationsits may view the cosmos?
So I say to you who deny evolution, hear what the scientists have to say.... at least they are talking. And their ways, although often complex, are far from mysterious.
@QuietForm Theia, a planetary object the size of Mars, struck earth in its infancy hurling debris into orbit, over millions of years this dust and debris accumulated to form our moon.
Give this comment a thumbs up if you think that the story depicted in this video is more beautiful, majestic and awe inspiring than anything that creationism has to offer.
@FillTheirVoid ''Purposelessness isn't beautiful ..'' <--- wanker comment. It's only those desperate to imagine that the universe was created for THEM who can't appreciate the majesty of something beyond themselves. The universe is beautiful, or didn't you actually watch the video? What's MOST beautiful is that this all happened without NEEDING a purpose. That's mindbogglingly awesome, certainly more so than the juvenile cravings of religion.
You're delusional ... it isn't objectively meaningful or beautiful ... you're assigning these qualities to something which in reality does not possess them.
You can marvel over objectively worthless and meaningless matter ... but I'm not crazy.
@FillTheirVoid ''it isn't objectively meaningful or beautiful''
What could ever count as ''objectively'' meaningful? Of course I mean beautiful TO US. That's the only use of the words that even make any sense.
''You can marvel over objectively worthless and meaningless matter ... but I'm not crazy.''
More stupid wordplay. Tack your tawdry Sky Daddy onto the universe if you like, but know that it's deeply unimpressive to anyone who finds enough wonder in the universe as it actually is.
It may be beautiful to you, but it isn't in reality ... it's just worthless matter. You're insisting that something is beautiful and meaningful when it fact it is not ... this is known as delusion.
There is no wonder in a purposeless universe ...
@FillTheirVoid ''By in reality I mean objectively, it's not really beautiful ''
''Objectively''. LOL. You're still placing things in categories where the statements make no logical sense. Try again. Objective beauty is just a bullshit term that religionists use to pass on their delusion up one level (to God), so that they don't have to think about what they're actually saying.
i totally agree with this, but please someone tell me.......where did the quarks come from? Something had to come from nothing and if we can't wrap our minds around that concept.....then i mean im not saying there is a God, but there is a possibility
@allenskater1700 The answer is that we simply don't know for now. If String Theory is correct, then not only the quarks, but all the other matter particles (electrons, muons etc) are vibrating strings of energy - in which case, all matter would be essentially the same thing, except that the intensity of the vibration varies... or there may be a different explanation. But continuing to look for more comprehensive explanations is what science is all about.
neither the question nor the answer make sense. when you ask the question of "what is outside the universe" or "what was before universe" you cant expect a serious answer because what science is about is things that happen within the universe, thats what its defined of, "to describe the processes in the universe" and your question is talking about outside the universe. so the question has nothing to do with science, everyone can let his imagination fly around
@allenskater1700 the sum of everything in our universe comes to 0. there is nothing you or i can do to change this. every force has an equal and opposite reaction force. so there isnt really a "creation" and our universe is an illusion of 0. that is to say its the internal structure of 0.
good question - that's what science is about, exploring things we don't yet understand. That's exciting ! What's not exciting is someone shrugging their shoulders and saying "goddidit" ( which is a non-answer).
It's quite possible the total energy of the universe is zero ( energy can be negative as well as positive). In that case, quantum fluctuations of the vacuum could produce the big bang - no need for a creator. Watch the video by Lawrence Krauss about this, very good.
@allenskater1700 The current idea is based in quantum physics. Particles are constantly coming into and out of existence at insane speeds. The mass of these particles make up something of 70% of the universe as we know it. Dark matter.
Given enough time, random quantum particles will come into existence with enough force to cause a big bang like event. The dark matter (under extreme conditions) forms into what we know as matter today.
@harlon57 If I may interject, let me remind you that whether or not God exists, humanity was responsible for that strife. And if I recall, science was responsible for its own strife. The problem with humans is that they have always found something to slaughter each other over, and probably always will.
@JosephStrang I'm not sure what point you are making. We are humans. Do you advocate we stop using the scientific method when attempting to understand the world? If not, what is your point? Science is the only reliable method we have to understand the world, and the fact it can be misused changes nothing.
We replaced astrology with astronomy, we now understand the germ theory rather than think god curses health, god doesn't cause tsunamis, geologist figured out plate-tectonics, etc.
@allenskater1700 Why does something have to come from nothing? We've never seen something come from nothing, so why would you say it has to?
That belief is human error. We create things, we see people born, we think we see things come from nothing, but really we don't. Everything we've ever created came from existing matter. For all we know, all of this has simply existed forever. Our lives are filled with 'beginnings' and 'ends', so naturally we misconceive that the universe must too.
@allenskater1700 To assert that God is a possible solution to anything is to invite confusion. Where did God come from? If a creator God can be claimed to have always existed then why not simply claim quarks have always existed? It solves nothing, offers no real explanatory information. The intellectually honest response to questions whose answers reside within the realms of our ignorance is: I don't know. In the meantime, our curiosity compells us to seek out meaningful, honest explanations...
@allenskater1700 Your question "where did the quarks come from?" can consequently be applied to the question of god's existence, "where did god come from?" These questions end up becoming an infinite loop. However, the questions themselves may just include the answers. Maybe god(s) or quarks are infinite in nature. They are the uncaused, or in essence eternal.
@FillTheirVoid I'd love to go to one video about the universe without seeing a post by an idiot who thinks he knows something about physics because he read a Christian apologetics book.
When the physicists can reconcile their laughable theory with logic, then I'll sit down. Until then, when I'm told that nothing caused something ... or that eternally existent matter altered it's own state ... well ... lol
@FillTheirVoid The B-theory of time used in contemporary physics (as a consequent of Einstein's work) makes the ideas of a cause of the universe an ill formed question. until you debunk Einstein and modern physics by providing a theory of time that better explains the evidence, then you are out of luck sir ;) also, who ever said that the type of nothing that you are talking about (the classic Greek conception) actually exists? It seems to be incoherent to me.
No, it is a perfectly legitimate question ... which must be answered. Concise and logical explanations are indicative of truth, ambiguous excuses are indicative of lies. Appealing to ignorance or ill formed fantasies regarding the negation of the laws of the universe are unacceptable.
You can believe that nothing was the cause of the universe, but I'm not an idiot ... so try again.
@FillTheirVoid no srsly, it isnt. In the B-theory of time, the cosmos being caused makes no sense. time is woven in the fabric of space, which constitutes the block universe. its funny that you brought up the laws of the universe & ignored the most important one. It makes your question as ill conceived as "what is the name of the married bachelors wife?". You havent made an effort to refute Einstein or the B-theory. all u said is that truth is good and called me dumb (ad hominem lol)
@FillTheirVoid time is a dimension woven space and causes are events in space. before the big bang doesnt make sense because causes only happen in time and time didnt exist yet. also, there was no singularity. Hawking recanted the singularity in the 1990's, so you are at least 20 years behind in your physics.
@FillTheirVoid according to the man that came up with the idea of the singularity (Stephen Hawking) there was no singularity. No, i am not retarded or crazy & calling me so violates the rules of logic (ad hom fallacy). I shouldnt have to teach u physics while replying to u. Current inflationary models (first pioneered by Andrei Linde) dictate that the universe is a quantum fluctuation. Both of the leading interpretations (Copenhagen & Many World) of physics allow this to happen.
I don't mean to be mean or to insult you ... I'm sincerely concerned for your mental health. Somebody needs to set up a hot line or something ... to help those who are so lost in delusion regarding universes making themselves.
@FillTheirVoid the B-theory of time makes very precise predictions about atomic clocks being flown in planes, the bending of light around the moon and precisely predicting eclipses. until u find a better answer for these phenomena which verify the theory, u are talking gibberish. Im beginning to think that u do not even known what the B-theory of time is because you have never studied physics. it would be awful if u talked so much about the cosmos w/out studying the physics of time & causation.
that's great, but you can't just dictate what reality is just because it seems infinitely lame and boring to you. i think god is boring, and instead matter just existing for no apparent is rather exciting.
oh, and thanks but i already knew about infinite regression. but i was hoping some ppl would see what i meant when i plopped the loop in there.
@allenskater1700 One theory is that our universe started as sort of a 'puncture' from another universe/dimension that spilled through to create and expand to become our universe.
Oh My "God" man did you make this?? If you did well then I just wanna say Thank you so very much for putting this together so well. The music, the visuals it's all... perfect. This is what I see when I try to imagine it all happening from scratch. Thank you. A bhuíochas céad míle. A full minute or longer on Abiogenesis would have made this the most complete 14 billion years attempt ever.
What boggles me is why anyone would choose to believe in such an over-simplistic story as Christian Creation when you could believe in the Big Bang, something so mindblowingly beautiful.
I love this.
Heathbb7 9 months ago
@UppruniTegundanna Because something can't come from nothing, I believe in god. We already know the universe didn't exist forever, so there had to be something else existing forever. With scientists attempting to find out what happened before the singularity, we're trying to find out what happened before the beginning, which doesn't make sense,
coolhoowip 9 months ago
@coolhoowip It's not clear that "nothing" in the Platonic sense of "absolute nothingness" is a valid concept. Even in perfect vacuums, we detect so-called "virtual particles" coming into existence and then disappearing from, apparently, nothing.
Viewing the world at the quantum level already plays absolute havoc with our sense of causality and time, so speculating about the cause of the universe using our intuitive, everyday notion of causality is unlikely to give us the right answer.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago 7
@coolhoowip Currently our model of the universe can be traced back to the Singularity, which is the state of the universe after one unit of Planck time. Planck units are the smallest units of measurement that make physical sense in the universe: you can't have half a Planck time. The upshot of this is that there is no possible measurement "before" Planck time 1 that isn't zero. To solve this conundrum, we must attempt to make sense of something that could have caused universal time to being.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago 2
@coolhoowip And when I say "make sense of" I really do mean "sense" - it must be an explanation that is based on properly accumulated evidence rather than speculation.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago 3
@mattatmcmaster and @UppruniTegundanna but what if we're all color blind? We won't know color's there
coolhoowip 9 months ago
@coolhoowip I wouldn't agree with this either: there are some people (incidentally, this trait is only found among women), who are tetrachromatic, which means that they see the world through four base colours, rather than the normal three. Are they seeing more accurately than us? Are they seeing perfectly? No!
The problem with your line of argument is that you are treating our human senses as though they are the special standard for perceiving the world around us. This is not true... (cont'd)
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago
... Our senses do not offer us a completely transparent window onto the world: they offer us a servicable window that works to give us the kind of information that we (as humans) need to survive in our natural state: i.e. as primates living in nature.
We can't directly see that matter is composed mostly of nothing (which it is), and we can't directly see that we are made of atoms, even though both of these things have been verified as true via machines that allow us to see at higher resolution.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago
@coolhoowip If you treat everything that falls outside of our naked senses as a black hole of mystery that can be filled with whatever entities you imagine might be there, you not only give yourself the impression that you have answers when you really don't, but you keep yourself restricted to a very narrow band of perception. We not only see, hear, taste smell and feel, but we also penetrate deep into matter and far out into space using extensions of our senses that we have built ourselves.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago
@strokesfan1107 God could be governed by laws that aren't physical and in another dimension. We can smell, see, hear, feel, and taste. If everyone was deaf, then we would all believe that sound doesn't exist. There could be some other sense that god has that we don't have. There are infinite possibilities for what could be in reality. Like the beginning of the video, there was nothing. That "nothing" could be something that we can't detect as humans. I believe in a god since science supports it.
coolhoowip 9 months ago
@coolhoowip Science doesn't really support your claim that he isn't governed by our universes physical laws at all, as science's objective is to better understand the universe, not just throw in the towel and say "well we can't explain it, so God did it. As for your theory on "if everyone were deaf we'd assume there was no sound" it simply isn't true as there are low frequency sounds no human can hear but thanks to science we have built devices to listen for them.
The more you know.
mattatmcmaster 9 months ago
@coolhoowip Sound is just the regular movement of air particles, which we can detect without ears. Deaf people even have raves. There are senses that other animals have that we don't, such as electroreception and echolocation; but we have built machines that allow us to "see" what creatures like monotremes and bats can perceive. We also know now that only the tiniest fraction of the elecromagnetic spectrum is visible to us - yet we have the technology to detect the extremes of the spectrum.
UppruniTegundanna 9 months ago
why don't these videos have millions of views?
Smhendo152 9 months ago
Nice video, and theory, but the world and all living things on it were created by God.
IdrealMari 9 months ago
@IdrealMari If so, then God is governed by the physical laws and forces which took place here. Either that, or God has not interfered with said laws since the Universe was set in motion.
As Hawking puts it "Could God create a rock so large that even he himself could not pick it up?"
strokesfan1107 9 months ago
@IdrealMari I love your smugness, think for yourself for a change.
ClassicalDan1 9 months ago
everyone with a doubt about gods exsistance should watch this
matthewdoa 10 months ago
Proud to be made of atoms.
Proud to be biological.
Proud to be human.
Proud to have a brain.
Proud to live in this century.
Seeing the truth.
From science.
Reality is awesome! :D
HUNAdamus94 10 months ago 15
Rube Goldman Machine?
xXRossyboyXx 10 months ago
amazing
angelloveit 10 months ago
M83!
angelicgurl77 10 months ago
NERDY CRAP stick
Otherspartan82 10 months ago
This brought a tear to my eye...
ilisbaani 11 months ago
The true story of how we came to be is far more grand and wonderful than any religious fable thought up by humans. Great video!!!!!
sritger 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@sritger SHUT UP, YOU FUCKING RACIST! ALL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE POINTS TO ONE THING, GOD! THERE IS NO EVOLUTION, NO BIG BANG, GOD CREATED OUR WORLD AND US! AND HE'S NOT A GUY ON A CLOUD THAT KILLS PEOPLE! HE'S A LOVING, CARING, SACRIFICING, ALL POWERFUL DIETY! READ THE BIBLE YOU DICK!
eleventymutantXZ 11 months ago
@eleventymutantXZ lol I think your caps lock key is stuck on...and its not helping your point
knowsall101 9 months ago
If you like Rube Goldberg Machines, you have to see TheSprice17's videos!! Theyre so amazing!
Thumbs up if youve heard of him! :))))
lolproductions0272 11 months ago 10
There's this video "People Are Awesome" where some guys do stunts on rollerskates and stuff. It's quite cool, but I think this is billions of times more awesome.
gwaur 1 year ago
the universe is a possibility generator. it will generate everything possible given the initial set of conditions
breaneainn 1 year ago 2
what if the big bang was the birth of God?
sweetunreason 1 year ago
@sweetunreason Retard.
eleventymutantXZ 11 months ago
It is kind of funny thinking of god being all "Watch this, I'm gonna make people. Just let me set this singularity up and..."
Pizzachu1 1 year ago
@Pizzachu1 Fuck You
eleventymutantXZ 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pizzachu1 Fuck You!
eleventymutantXZ 11 months ago
The first second I already knew I was going to add this to my favorites. This is my bible.
minclLess 1 year ago
what is the music used in this video
devinjr15 1 year ago
@devinjr15
"Music:
Lower Your Eyelids to Die with the Sun / Teen Angst - M83"
RegnstadsKatt 1 year ago
i dont have questions after watching this
blackwoodjankins 1 year ago
this video is just spectacular. Beyond words
derekrules420 1 year ago
wow also everyone that commented on this video is faggots just watch the fucking thing :D
FadedVictor 1 year ago
i remember watching this documentary. my 8th science teacher showed this to my class. the universe or multiverse is considered the largest chain reaction of all (rube goldberg do not exist in this area)
ThomasisaMAN 1 year ago
@ThomasisaMAN omg my 8th grade science teacher showed this too me also :D
FadedVictor 1 year ago
@FadedVictor whom was ur teacher?
ThomasisaMAN 1 year ago
i remember watching this documentary. my 8th science teacher showed this to my class
ThomasisaMAN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThomasisaMAN My 8th grade science teacher showed me this also :D
FadedVictor 1 year ago
this is beautiful
Petehiker 1 year ago
The title of the video is not really well chosen.
First, Rube Goldberg machines are specifically designed by someone. The universe was not designed.
Second, Rube Goldberg machines are designed to be as unnecessarily complex as possible to achieve an utterly trivial result. The universe is the most efficient machine in existence and the results achieved are anything but trivial.
Video win, title fail.
sth128 1 year ago
lol at Fillthevoid all he can do is call me names. that is usually the sign of a complete triumph in an argument :)
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
Awesome music and video quality
The big bang supernovas cosmic collisions were excellent
vidhchand 1 year ago
awesome music and great quality the rest is awesomer
vidhchand 1 year ago
because the atheist universe is soo much more beautiful than any "creation myth' ever was.
aSheeple 1 year ago
The creation of the know universe is cool and all, but where's the Rube Goldberg machine?
hibber25 1 year ago
@hibber25
The universe itself is the Rube Goldberg machine my friend, because everything depicted in the video happened so you could be sitting today on your chair asking that question :)
Piersmaru 1 year ago 2
@Piersmaru ahem "•Goldberg: United States cartoonist who drew intricate diagrams of very complicated and impractical contraptions that accomplished little or nothing (1883-1970)." I'm fairly sure the creation of the universe shouldn't labeled as "little or nothing."
hibber25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Piersmaru ''everything depicted in the video happened so you could be sitting today on your chair asking that question :)''
A bit pretension, isn't it? To imagine that the whole universe went about the it did IN ORDER THAT someone could contemplate it? Better to say that we could not have been here if the universe hadn't gone about that way.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
i used to not believe in god, but the more i have learned about the world around me, the more i am amazed. god wanted us to have the mind of a child, always open and fascinated by the world around us. we are meant to treat everyday as a wonderous new day. this trait has allowed us to push forward and understand more and more. to truly understand gods work.
heyshutupyou 1 year ago
there are similarities between the bible and physics. For example, god is light and created the universe from nothing. energy is essentially waves in the fabric of space wich is nothing, and matter is bundles of light energy bound together. matter is made from nothing. we came from nothing. we have no fucking idea what is going on so please atheists, be a little more open to religion. you think god would explain evolution in the bible? early man wouldnt understand so its simplified.
heyshutupyou 1 year ago
@heyshutupyou Why are you specific to the god of the bible? This clearly shows that you are biased towards one man-made religious text. How come you haven't replaced the bible with the qu`ron? Might this be the result of an environmental factor? Cultural maybe? Leave the bible out of it when you're addressing atheists, because it's fairly easy to spot your BS. Right away, we're going to argue on why we should give you special attention rather than your fellow man who also has similar beliefs.
abedbae 1 year ago
@heyshutupyou
"there are similarities between the bible and physics" - good one. Bibles perception of physics is about as good as that of a 5 year old child. By cherry picking couple of statements that vaguely relate to some of our understanding of physics you conveniently omit the crap load of obvious blunders.
BibleSceince 101:Flat earth, sun rotates around earth, no rain or rainbows with water present, animals can fly and talk, disease caused by demons, dinosours and humans coexisted, etc...
stevekad1 1 year ago
A wonderful fantasy. Great comfort indeed for anyone who wishes to deny He who is responsible for it all, and conveniently any consequential obligation to Him (which is ultimately what it has always been about).
It is as much a leap of faith, and in fact a less reasonable one, for the atheist to believe that all came from nothing than it is for the theist to acknowledge that there is only One without cause: God.
1ndabag 1 year ago
@1ndabag ''A wonderful fantasy. Great comfort indeed for anyone who wishes to deny He who is responsible for it all, and conveniently any consequential obligation to Him (which is ultimately what it has always been about).''
Only in the minds of those who want to be slaves.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@cayetanoluis This video is not an argument of science over god at best its an argument oer science over creationism. Science has never seeked to disprove the exsistence of God it is simply the search for truth. Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds in the history of mankind was also a trong believer in god. This video makes me believe in god more not less. The sheer scope of both size and time makes it hard to imagine there isn't a higher purpose to it all.
Sacorian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sacorian ''Albert Einstein one of the greatest minds in the history of mankind was also a trong believer in god. This video makes me believe in god more not less.''
The ''God'' you're talking about isn't the one Einstein believed in. He rejected as childish and absurd a purpose driven God. And no, it isn't hard to imagine there isn't a higher purpose. Just pay attention to what the science actually SAYS, rather than what you want to read into it for emotional reasons.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@Sacorian I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. - Einstein
I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings. - Einstein
k?
k1llk1ngph30n1x 1 year ago
@k1llk1ngph30n1x The second quote is closer to my belief of the order of the universe.
Sacorian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1ndabag ''It is as much a leap of faith, and in fact a less reasonable one, for the atheist to believe that all came from nothing than it is for the theist to acknowledge that there is only One without cause: God.''
Nup. The greater leap of faith is to assume that a causeless being (with a consciousness!) is the cause of the universe, rather than to assume that the universe didn't require a cause. SOMETHING didn't require a cause, so let's cut out the useless deity.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
damnit i wanted a real rube goldberg machine!!!!!!!!!!!
MrZshosh 1 year ago
WTF. This is dumb, how can anyone believe this when the bible clearly states: God did it.
bikerboy4378 1 year ago
I'd like to show this video to Jesus
armd86 1 year ago
The soundtrack makes this video so FUCKING EPIC!
armd86 1 year ago
I'm sorry but believing in a God that thinks slavery and beating your wife is cool, is definitely not smart enough to create the universe in such perfect design.
zargonzo101 1 year ago 2
There is no why, only a how. In knowing the how, we may actuate a set of circumstances that we find desirable. It is science that gives us the tools to that end. I would use science to banish privation, greed, crime, war, bigotry and disease to merely passages in history books. Please watch my featured video and participate to help support the advancement of science.
LordSlag 1 year ago
amazing nothing has Eva explained like that....
yoshi717abc 1 year ago
The universe was never "NOTHING"... Why would people make this assumption? The universe should be assumed to be eternal though the depth of it's process is close to unfathomable... For me it is difficult to understand how the process continues despite entropy though our understanding is very limited...
nietzscheanx0 1 year ago
@nietzscheanx0 : It could have a closed boundary in the past as posited by Hartle-Hawking cosmologies.
geodesicks 1 year ago
here's a completely unrelated question...of all the planets in the Universe, how is it that we ended up on this one?
b74k3 1 year ago
@b74k3 : If we'd ended up on any other that could evolve and support life you'd have asked the same question.
geodesicks 1 year ago
@b74k3 Because, ultimately, all things must exist in a given state. No matter how rare a given state is, a set of energy and matter must have one state at any one given time. You and I, and all our fellow humans, exist here because this is how our stellar and biological evolution took place. It is, I agree, a wholly insufficient answer, but, nevertheless, it is the truth...and so it must be enough. :)
LordSlag 1 year ago
@b74k3 I think the question is why did this one end up with us. Either by Divine Engineering or by Cosmic Fluke either one is unmeasurably mind boggling to fathom. If you believe it was created by the will of a being how ever great he/she/they are then its a design of unfathomable precision. If you believe life to be a cosmic fluke then the Idea that 4billion years of random occurences formed an unbroken string of random circumstance up the point where the fluke of life was even possible.
Sacorian 1 year ago
How can you believe in any religion when you've got more logical evidence of 'how is all happened' than you would in the bible, koran, ect.? Merely a fantasy book created by man.
purplexcoke 1 year ago
The role of science is to sniff out the mathematical quantities that support models... No doubt we can add wrinkles to this model here, but it shows science is very capable of providing us with wrinkles. What it doesn't often do, is take a look back and look at the beauty of the steps... It's what we as humans can add to the universe, reverse engineer it and observe. No universe exists if noone can sense it ;) and screw religion, observation itself is innately spiritual. Making up stuff isn't.
NeonSloaney 1 year ago 21
@NeonSloaney two words man "Anthropic Principle"
graddivcurl 11 months ago
@graddivcurl 3 months ago me was such a douche. I wonder what future 3 months me will be.
NeonSloaney 11 months ago
@graddivcurl 2 words 4 u nerdy shit
Otherspartan82 10 months ago
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE FIRST SONG!?!?!?!? PLEASE!!!
JosephStrang 1 year ago
@JosephStrang It's in the description. Both are by M83. The First song is called Lower Your Eyelids to Die with the Sun.
saltesc 1 year ago
wonderful and amazing :)
nisko123 1 year ago
very very nice but the title is a little misleading but no matter i favorite this
maribakumon 1 year ago
The reason we live is because of these complex events that happened lead up to our existance... Amazing. :]
DantoraMandova 1 year ago
ive thinking that.... the whole universe is somewhat like chain reaction...
kalikonyat 1 year ago
@kalikonyat thats why its called the ultimate Rube Goldberg machine. A Rube Goldberg machine is a fancy name for a chain reaction
maribakumon 1 year ago
very beutiful
iuo4z5b734h8579 1 year ago
Hydrogen is a colourless, odourless gas which, if left alone in large enough quantities for long enough, will begin to think about itself.
mussedeq 1 year ago
ha! it works in the US!
nelsonsb2 1 year ago
This Rube Goldberg has barely even begun I bet
GangsterNub 1 year ago
DO you happen to have a high def version of this, that can be downloaded?
Jaciilyn 1 year ago
@Jaciilyn I was wondering the same thing!
I would like to have an HD version on my comp to show people!
Sure I can use YouTube ripper but i want HD!
RedAcidRemix 1 year ago 2
@RedAcidRemix Hi there,
I think I'll start uploading my videos to Megaupload for people to download if they want. If you go to my channel page, you'll find the link to the Ultimate Rube Goldberg Machine in my channel description. The rest will follow...
UppruniTegundanna 1 year ago
@UppruniTegundanna
Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it!
RedAcidRemix 1 year ago
all because the universe needed plastic and didn't know how to make it ))
xanchoq 1 year ago
54 people are creationists
NicoPisciotta 1 year ago 16
Comment removed
mussedeq 1 year ago
Could you upload the original video file to Rapidshare, Megaupload, Mediafire, etc. Whatever site you want? I'd really like to have this.
RedAcidRemix 1 year ago
isn't that way cooler than so dude wishing us up in 6 days :D
steveo20007 1 year ago 8
@steveo20007 I'm not so sure it is dude. Let's be clear I'm not starting another Science Versus Religeon debate with you. but IF the universe truly WAS created by a divine being in a mere 6 days that WOULD be cooler still....its the Fire principle....Man finds a fire by chance (caused by lightning probably) that's pretty awesome. But man MAKES fire that's even cooler. I admit my analogy is a little shaky hopefully you get my meaning though.
Sacorian 1 year ago
@Sacorian Or maybe life was inevitable, because it is so simple...
And the result isn't us, we're like the earliest mammals or the dinosaurs. We don't know what we will ultimately become. (Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy had a fun twist on what our purpose is)
Mightypua 11 months ago
the music and images are superb and fit so well together.. beautifully made there should be an award for such videos.. great work
CartervonRiedel 1 year ago 2
I don't quite understand the title of this video.. i know a rube goldberg machine is something over-engineered etc, but you're video suggests why bother making matter and going through a lengthy process when something could just "be"... like the way creationsits may view the cosmos?
725672567256 1 year ago
Do I have proof of God´s existence, no.
Do people of any religion have proof, no.
So I say to you who deny evolution, hear what the scientists have to say.... at least they are talking. And their ways, although often complex, are far from mysterious.
gunni449 1 year ago 3
@QuietForm Theia, a planetary object the size of Mars, struck earth in its infancy hurling debris into orbit, over millions of years this dust and debris accumulated to form our moon.
gunni449 1 year ago
Well, for a minute there, even *I* was speechless!
Totally cool in it's far-outedness!
But at the end, you state that no one knows why.
Well...why not?
Silverhairspeaks 1 year ago
Give this comment a thumbs up if you think that the story depicted in this video is more beautiful, majestic and awe inspiring than anything that creationism has to offer.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago 18
@cayetanoluis
Purposelessness isn't beautiful ... such is delusion.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid ''Purposelessness isn't beautiful ..'' <--- wanker comment. It's only those desperate to imagine that the universe was created for THEM who can't appreciate the majesty of something beyond themselves. The universe is beautiful, or didn't you actually watch the video? What's MOST beautiful is that this all happened without NEEDING a purpose. That's mindbogglingly awesome, certainly more so than the juvenile cravings of religion.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@cayetanoluis
You're delusional ... it isn't objectively meaningful or beautiful ... you're assigning these qualities to something which in reality does not possess them.
You can marvel over objectively worthless and meaningless matter ... but I'm not crazy.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid ''it isn't objectively meaningful or beautiful''
What could ever count as ''objectively'' meaningful? Of course I mean beautiful TO US. That's the only use of the words that even make any sense.
''You can marvel over objectively worthless and meaningless matter ... but I'm not crazy.''
More stupid wordplay. Tack your tawdry Sky Daddy onto the universe if you like, but know that it's deeply unimpressive to anyone who finds enough wonder in the universe as it actually is.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@cayetanoluis
It may be beautiful to you, but it isn't in reality ... it's just worthless matter. You're insisting that something is beautiful and meaningful when it fact it is not ... this is known as delusion.
There is no wonder in a purposeless universe ...
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid ''It may be beautiful to you, but it isn't in reality''
What the fuck does that mean? 'In reality', as though beauty can exist independently of a mind?
''You're insisting that something is beautiful and meaningful when it fact it is not''
Yes it is. To us.
''this is known as delusion''
And your words are known as 'confusion'
''There is no wonder in a purposeless universe''
Except one in which there are beings capable of conceiving wonder.
Your comments = GAY DAD WANK.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@cayetanoluis
By in reality I mean objectively, it's not really beautiful ... it may be so in your delusional mind ... but not in reality.
It's like standing in awe over cow dung ... it's worthless.
No, there is no wonder in a purposeless universe ... wondering about objectively meaningless matter is laughably ignorant.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FillTheirVoid ''By in reality I mean objectively, it's not really beautiful ''
''Objectively''. LOL. You're still placing things in categories where the statements make no logical sense. Try again. Objective beauty is just a bullshit term that religionists use to pass on their delusion up one level (to God), so that they don't have to think about what they're actually saying.
Now beat it, kid. The adults are thinking.
cayetanoluis 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid objectivity is a delusion.... there can be no object without an observer
causticklief 1 year ago
@causticklief
That is false ... trees still make a noise when they fall in the forest where no man is.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
The moon formation gets me every time. Instant baaaaawww.
from93till 1 year ago
Hey great song btw.
pshawtube 1 year ago
Thank you. This made my night.
fungiside 1 year ago
M83!!!! this is the last track on before the damn heals us...really cool relaxing song
golemosworld15 1 year ago
so f***ing smart man !!!
eystryus 1 year ago
This is one of the most beautiful depictions of Creation I have ever seen. Thank you for posting this UppruniTegundanna
dalaland 1 year ago
Origem... Evolução... -Um olhar mais crítico será bom pra uma resposta ao vídeo.
Ainda: Abiogênese? -Interessante.
Muito bonito, gostei.
Folhadeoliveira 1 year ago
i totally agree with this, but please someone tell me.......where did the quarks come from? Something had to come from nothing and if we can't wrap our minds around that concept.....then i mean im not saying there is a God, but there is a possibility
allenskater1700 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 The answer is that we simply don't know for now. If String Theory is correct, then not only the quarks, but all the other matter particles (electrons, muons etc) are vibrating strings of energy - in which case, all matter would be essentially the same thing, except that the intensity of the vibration varies... or there may be a different explanation. But continuing to look for more comprehensive explanations is what science is all about.
UppruniTegundanna 1 year ago 24
@UppruniTegundanna + allenskater1700
neither the question nor the answer make sense. when you ask the question of "what is outside the universe" or "what was before universe" you cant expect a serious answer because what science is about is things that happen within the universe, thats what its defined of, "to describe the processes in the universe" and your question is talking about outside the universe. so the question has nothing to do with science, everyone can let his imagination fly around
shitzoalc6v 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 the sum of everything in our universe comes to 0. there is nothing you or i can do to change this. every force has an equal and opposite reaction force. so there isnt really a "creation" and our universe is an illusion of 0. that is to say its the internal structure of 0.
billybob1212 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 god is as real as hell, and heavan and earth.
pplinmypocket 1 year ago
@allenskater1700
The answer is simple: There is no beginning and no end. Its an infinite circle. Something doesnt come from nothing, there NEVER WAS a "nothing"
masagrad 1 year ago
@allenskater1700
good question - that's what science is about, exploring things we don't yet understand. That's exciting ! What's not exciting is someone shrugging their shoulders and saying "goddidit" ( which is a non-answer).
It's quite possible the total energy of the universe is zero ( energy can be negative as well as positive). In that case, quantum fluctuations of the vacuum could produce the big bang - no need for a creator. Watch the video by Lawrence Krauss about this, very good.
TheStringtheorysucks 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 "And no one knows why... " @9:45
CriX098 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 The current idea is based in quantum physics. Particles are constantly coming into and out of existence at insane speeds. The mass of these particles make up something of 70% of the universe as we know it. Dark matter.
Given enough time, random quantum particles will come into existence with enough force to cause a big bang like event. The dark matter (under extreme conditions) forms into what we know as matter today.
lungdart85 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 When we don't have an answer for something, saying "God did it" is no answer at all. It is no different than saying it was "Magic."
It tells us nothing about the mechanism that caused it.
If God could always exist, why couldn't energy always exist?
God is nothing more than the label ignorant people applied to our lack of understanding.
We may never know, or someday we may have that final knowledge.
If it wasn't a god, wasn't all this religious strife needless?
harlon57 1 year ago
@harlon57 If I may interject, let me remind you that whether or not God exists, humanity was responsible for that strife. And if I recall, science was responsible for its own strife. The problem with humans is that they have always found something to slaughter each other over, and probably always will.
JosephStrang 1 year ago
@JosephStrang I'm not sure what point you are making. We are humans. Do you advocate we stop using the scientific method when attempting to understand the world? If not, what is your point? Science is the only reliable method we have to understand the world, and the fact it can be misused changes nothing.
We replaced astrology with astronomy, we now understand the germ theory rather than think god curses health, god doesn't cause tsunamis, geologist figured out plate-tectonics, etc.
harlon57 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 Why does something have to come from nothing? We've never seen something come from nothing, so why would you say it has to?
That belief is human error. We create things, we see people born, we think we see things come from nothing, but really we don't. Everything we've ever created came from existing matter. For all we know, all of this has simply existed forever. Our lives are filled with 'beginnings' and 'ends', so naturally we misconceive that the universe must too.
TheJacolyte 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 To assert that God is a possible solution to anything is to invite confusion. Where did God come from? If a creator God can be claimed to have always existed then why not simply claim quarks have always existed? It solves nothing, offers no real explanatory information. The intellectually honest response to questions whose answers reside within the realms of our ignorance is: I don't know. In the meantime, our curiosity compells us to seek out meaningful, honest explanations...
jssherrard 1 year ago
@allenskater1700 Your question "where did the quarks come from?" can consequently be applied to the question of god's existence, "where did god come from?" These questions end up becoming an infinite loop. However, the questions themselves may just include the answers. Maybe god(s) or quarks are infinite in nature. They are the uncaused, or in essence eternal.
abedbae 1 year ago
@abedbae
You mean an infinite regress ... this only occurs in regard to causes.
The "quarks" according to the video were caused. (they had a beginning)
God Himself however had no cause. (without beginning)
Arbitrarily existent matter is infinitely lame and boring.
Persons and purposes however ...
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid I'd love to go to one video about the universe without seeing a post by an idiot who thinks he knows something about physics because he read a Christian apologetics book.
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
Logic needn't be very complicated.
When the physicists can reconcile their laughable theory with logic, then I'll sit down. Until then, when I'm told that nothing caused something ... or that eternally existent matter altered it's own state ... well ... lol
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid The B-theory of time used in contemporary physics (as a consequent of Einstein's work) makes the ideas of a cause of the universe an ill formed question. until you debunk Einstein and modern physics by providing a theory of time that better explains the evidence, then you are out of luck sir ;) also, who ever said that the type of nothing that you are talking about (the classic Greek conception) actually exists? It seems to be incoherent to me.
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
No, it is a perfectly legitimate question ... which must be answered. Concise and logical explanations are indicative of truth, ambiguous excuses are indicative of lies. Appealing to ignorance or ill formed fantasies regarding the negation of the laws of the universe are unacceptable.
You can believe that nothing was the cause of the universe, but I'm not an idiot ... so try again.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid no srsly, it isnt. In the B-theory of time, the cosmos being caused makes no sense. time is woven in the fabric of space, which constitutes the block universe. its funny that you brought up the laws of the universe & ignored the most important one. It makes your question as ill conceived as "what is the name of the married bachelors wife?". You havent made an effort to refute Einstein or the B-theory. all u said is that truth is good and called me dumb (ad hominem lol)
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
In order for an event to take place time is necessarily involved, the expansion during the big bang being the prime example.
If there was no time throughout the duration of the singularities existence then the event of expansion is impossible.
Logic ... it's good.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid time is a dimension woven space and causes are events in space. before the big bang doesnt make sense because causes only happen in time and time didnt exist yet. also, there was no singularity. Hawking recanted the singularity in the 1990's, so you are at least 20 years behind in your physics.
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
So there was no singularity with which to expand? Are you retarded? Did nothing expand or what? You need to be put in a psychiatric hospital.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid according to the man that came up with the idea of the singularity (Stephen Hawking) there was no singularity. No, i am not retarded or crazy & calling me so violates the rules of logic (ad hom fallacy). I shouldnt have to teach u physics while replying to u. Current inflationary models (first pioneered by Andrei Linde) dictate that the universe is a quantum fluctuation. Both of the leading interpretations (Copenhagen & Many World) of physics allow this to happen.
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
So a temporary change in the amount of energy in a point of space resulted in space?
Seek psychiatric counseling ... don't get too lost in your fantastical delusions ...
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
I don't mean to be mean or to insult you ... I'm sincerely concerned for your mental health. Somebody needs to set up a hot line or something ... to help those who are so lost in delusion regarding universes making themselves.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid the B-theory of time makes very precise predictions about atomic clocks being flown in planes, the bending of light around the moon and precisely predicting eclipses. until u find a better answer for these phenomena which verify the theory, u are talking gibberish. Im beginning to think that u do not even known what the B-theory of time is because you have never studied physics. it would be awful if u talked so much about the cosmos w/out studying the physics of time & causation.
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
Now you're going off on a tangent ...
Your ambiguous fantasies aren't explanations.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid the irony of you saying logic is good then following it up by making a straw man and a red herring fallacy ;)
OrderoftheWhiteHand 1 year ago
@OrderoftheWhiteHand
I'm not going to sit around waiting for you to look up your answer on the internet. With all honesty ... please ... seek psychiatric counseling.
FillTheirVoid 1 year ago
@FillTheirVoid
that's great, but you can't just dictate what reality is just because it seems infinitely lame and boring to you. i think god is boring, and instead matter just existing for no apparent is rather exciting.
oh, and thanks but i already knew about infinite regression. but i was hoping some ppl would see what i meant when i plopped the loop in there.
abedbae 9 months ago
@abedbae
No, but God certainly does.
You would be irrational then.
FillTheirVoid 9 months ago
@allenskater1700 One theory is that our universe started as sort of a 'puncture' from another universe/dimension that spilled through to create and expand to become our universe.
LunarFuror 1 year ago
kinda inspires me to be a science teacher you know? but there would probably be way to much religious b.s that wouldnt let me teach it
TXnateDOTdawg 1 year ago
absolutely amazing! love the video....it is very interesting
TXnateDOTdawg 1 year ago
well this pretty much sums it all up.
paintdataint 1 year ago
Stars = Bright Engines
twosixteen 1 year ago
Awesome!
weeeezzll 1 year ago
Oh My "God" man did you make this?? If you did well then I just wanna say Thank you so very much for putting this together so well. The music, the visuals it's all... perfect. This is what I see when I try to imagine it all happening from scratch. Thank you. A bhuíochas céad míle. A full minute or longer on Abiogenesis would have made this the most complete 14 billion years attempt ever.
1PintLasher 1 year ago
By "make this" I actually mean compile and put together by the way!
1PintLasher 1 year ago
What boggles me is why anyone would choose to believe in such an over-simplistic story as Christian Creation when you could believe in the Big Bang, something so mindblowingly beautiful.
cubiczzirconia 1 year ago 19
@cubiczzirconia amen bro
1PintLasher 1 year ago