It's not that simple, not just time. Time uses particles to function as all forces do, all of which are relative, so all use fractals in relativity. There are different types of positrons, they oppose flow in a magnetic field, or move at different rates.
anyway, unification key I have, it's on my channel.
All waves including light are a kinetic pump z wave, which forces particle exchange. All space is particles. No magical sucking photons or superstrings.
Are you actually explaining the Higgs Boson effects on Quantum theory?, where we can not quantify the mass of such Particles therefore we remain unsure of how to apply these factors into the equation ?will they all be the same mass and energy when we find the HB ?....Think there is only two question there...or is there?.
@IHATEATHEIST2 No this theory is explaining how the passage of time is formed by each new photon of quantized energy forms a new moment in time that will be part of the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime . We see our Universe moment by moment or photon by photon because the wave-function is continuously collapsing and reforming forming the arrow of time.
@IHATEATHEIST2 I hate them also. Anyway, key to unification is on my channel. Time is caused by decayed particles, mostly neutrinos, returning to stars and black holes where they will be fused into massive tachyons, higgs bosons etc.... The opposing flow gets quarks stuck inside sets of bosons. Each atom does make it's own space/time, he's got that right.
@StateofMind09 Yes! But what is that border? Could it be the border between the observers’s future and past? Could the Uncertainty Principle and the probability of the quantum world be the same uncertainty and probability that the observer will have with any future event? In Quantum Atom Theory the answer to these questions is yes!
@nickharvey7 Have you tried to get this theory published at any point? As a theory it works well at fitting in with certain observed phenomena, but in order for it to gain acceptance it will need to make [predictions]. Mathematical representation is almost necessary for this criteria, and so far this theory seems to be an analogous representation of pre-established mathematical law.
@alphaignus Yes it is based on pre-established mathematical law I believe this is the best thing it can be based on. I feel we do not need new mathematics we are up to our eye balls in mathematics. What we need is a simple idea that can explain the mathematics. A simple idea like Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is the same probability that the observer will have with any future event.
@nickharvey7 Yes, but is your theory mathematically or experimentally falsifiable? This is the condition that will cause it to be recognised as legitimate theory and not just guesswork, however educated.
@alphaignus The Two Slit Experiment cannot be explained by any other theory. It is experimental evidence that time is linked to light and is a process in three dimensional space. Only this theory can give us an explanation for irrational numbers like pi and the reason why we can never write down the complete value of an irrational number. It is because they represent the continuous process of time that forms Einstein curvature of spacetime.
Thanks for the comment I have used diagrams, drawings, oil painting in this video. I have tried to make this theory as simple as possible in the belief that everyone should be able to understand it.
Thanks for the comment I havent worked out how to get rid of the background noise yet. In some ways I like it because it drowns out my voice without drowning out what I am trying to say.
sorry nick I somehow missed this response. I would not worry about the background noise, like I said it gives your vids a sense of casualness that is relaxing.
your vides are well done. its funny but the background noise such as your computer fan makes the video somehow better.... its more like being spoken to , not lectured at..if you get my meaning.
Windmills do not work that way! GOOD NIGHT!
Typho0n86 4 months ago
WTF
127miles 8 months ago
Heisenberg's theory of uncertainity
mansequotte 1 year ago
It's not that simple, not just time. Time uses particles to function as all forces do, all of which are relative, so all use fractals in relativity. There are different types of positrons, they oppose flow in a magnetic field, or move at different rates.
anyway, unification key I have, it's on my channel.
All waves including light are a kinetic pump z wave, which forces particle exchange. All space is particles. No magical sucking photons or superstrings.
mikefromspace 1 year ago
Are you actually explaining the Higgs Boson effects on Quantum theory?, where we can not quantify the mass of such Particles therefore we remain unsure of how to apply these factors into the equation ?will they all be the same mass and energy when we find the HB ?....Think there is only two question there...or is there?.
IHATEATHEIST2 1 year ago
@IHATEATHEIST2 No this theory is explaining how the passage of time is formed by each new photon of quantized energy forms a new moment in time that will be part of the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime . We see our Universe moment by moment or photon by photon because the wave-function is continuously collapsing and reforming forming the arrow of time.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
@IHATEATHEIST2 I hate them also. Anyway, key to unification is on my channel. Time is caused by decayed particles, mostly neutrinos, returning to stars and black holes where they will be fused into massive tachyons, higgs bosons etc.... The opposing flow gets quarks stuck inside sets of bosons. Each atom does make it's own space/time, he's got that right.
mikefromspace 1 year ago
The quantum world exists on the border between our dimension(3) and the next dimension(4/time), it seems to me.
StateofMind09 1 year ago
@StateofMind09 Yes! But what is that border? Could it be the border between the observers’s future and past? Could the Uncertainty Principle and the probability of the quantum world be the same uncertainty and probability that the observer will have with any future event? In Quantum Atom Theory the answer to these questions is yes!
nickharvey7 1 year ago
Thanks for the comment! I am trying to promote this theory and any help on You Tube or in the scientific community will be gratefully welcomed.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
@nickharvey7 Have you tried to get this theory published at any point? As a theory it works well at fitting in with certain observed phenomena, but in order for it to gain acceptance it will need to make [predictions]. Mathematical representation is almost necessary for this criteria, and so far this theory seems to be an analogous representation of pre-established mathematical law.
alphaignus 1 year ago
@alphaignus Yes it is based on pre-established mathematical law I believe this is the best thing it can be based on. I feel we do not need new mathematics we are up to our eye balls in mathematics. What we need is a simple idea that can explain the mathematics. A simple idea like Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is the same probability that the observer will have with any future event.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
@nickharvey7 Yes, but is your theory mathematically or experimentally falsifiable? This is the condition that will cause it to be recognised as legitimate theory and not just guesswork, however educated.
alphaignus 1 year ago
@alphaignus The Two Slit Experiment cannot be explained by any other theory. It is experimental evidence that time is linked to light and is a process in three dimensional space. Only this theory can give us an explanation for irrational numbers like pi and the reason why we can never write down the complete value of an irrational number. It is because they represent the continuous process of time that forms Einstein curvature of spacetime.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
Thank you, this is a beautiful explanation of a beautiful concept.
JoMZC 2 years ago
Thanks for the comment I have used diagrams, drawings, oil painting in this video. I have tried to make this theory as simple as possible in the belief that everyone should be able to understand it.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
I need to start paying attention in my physics class, maybe then I'll understand!!
ConnorFlockSpeevage 2 years ago
Thanks for the comment I havent worked out how to get rid of the background noise yet. In some ways I like it because it drowns out my voice without drowning out what I am trying to say.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
sorry nick I somehow missed this response. I would not worry about the background noise, like I said it gives your vids a sense of casualness that is relaxing.
YogiToad 2 years ago
your vides are well done. its funny but the background noise such as your computer fan makes the video somehow better.... its more like being spoken to , not lectured at..if you get my meaning.
YogiToad 2 years ago