Added: 1 month ago
From: TheGUNNShop
Views: 23,979
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,433)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They are not making nuclear weapons. SO what if they are testing missles? They need to test them to defend themselves against Israel.

  • @Humberto4790 They also aren't letting UN inspectors in to make sure they aren't making nuclear weapons. If they aren't, they have nothing to hide, right?

  • @nuguns92 What the fuck are you talking about? They always let IEAE inspectors come in. You are mis informed.

  • @Humberto4790 February 21st, 2012. /watch?v=AcsR6xl47ZE  Iran blocks IAEA UN inspectors.

  • @nuguns92 it's fox news, how could you belive them? RT ftw

  • @Humberto4790 It was also reported on MSNBC and CNN. Would you prefer a link from them?

  • @YourSistersHusband I'm not talking about people leaving the military. That's different. This was as the Americans were about to invade and they were training everyboy, women and children as well. That's setting up for a guerilla war. You're the moron. Those are two totally different scenarios.

  • bhhgv

  • I am concerned about whats going on but I really don't want to keep my mind on things like this. cause i want to just get on my everyday life and worry less about stupid politicians screwing things up along with causing problems.

  • bitch dont fucking send spies then!! its not rocket fucking science. how would u feel if they did that to u huh?

  • 10:45 Oh, god that was funny xD

  • @Darkfoxx999 When did I say the U.S was the only one capable of developing them? Never. I said it's highly unlikely the Germans were developing one at the same time and I've never heard anything about that.

  • lol horm(UH)z

    i was always taught to pronounce it: horm(EW)z

  • bobloblaw

  • Great work man; I enjoyed it. I came after watching the GS video.

  • I belive Bush legitimatly thought Iraq had WMDs.

  • @TheRandomguy2011 well his dad did sell them to Iraq, so they definitely used to.

  • history is written by the Victorian

  • America takes what they want from negotiations what they cant win in war

  • and yet Australia allays has to America

  • Your background is copyright...

  • @SugaaarRush We don't care man!

  • you got less dislikes

  • Thumbs up for Gunns imitating Canadians! xD

  • @unleashedr did you see his background it was Toronto Canadian city

  • The middle east and north Africa are mest up and Iran can't have that . Then there would be a terrest attack on it and the UN would want to stop it. Ok then it will be Canada US and britain doing all the fighting . If WWIII breaks out then all of the UN will fight

  • @Talentedpunker wow. making hypothises off of a call of duty game.

  • star wars

  • Iran not as bad they want to wipe out Isreal and all of the west.... But there not a bad nation with evil desires -_-

  • Shut up u American ;-)

  • GUNNS>All other news channels on TV.

  • the traitors in america are also condemned to death

  • maybe he was related to the recent terrorist attacks in iran

  • GUNNS IS SO COOL XD

  • i like trains.

  • that's my iPhone background

  • Tell me now if the us found a iranian spy they would torture the shit out of them and then sendthem to a high security prison and then kill them. sad but true

  • i knew this was gonna happen.

  • The Government Lies!! Filled with politicians that say one thing, and DO another!

  • If america and iran go to war, that is really bad. It would escalate into a nuclear world war, quickly.

  • @xDeanyy no it wouldn't. Did the Soviet Union and the U.S go to nuclear war? They easily could have with the stupid stuff both sides did but neither shot a nuke. Now people know about what would happen if there was a nuclear war, nuclear winter. It would wipe out mankind if enough nukes were shot. It will not go to a nuclear war, period.

  • Small idea building nukes is highly expensive

  • I'm sorry but the leader of Iran is fucking insane. He should not be allowed nuclear anything.

  • @QuantumChaotic George Bush is the maniac who said there were "weapons of mass destruntion" in Iraq, and guess what? there were NONE so i think the only country in the world which shouldn't have Nuclear Weapons is the US because all you do is kill, kill, kill, kill and kill even more.

  • @Vunduva I like how you said "you". I'm Canadian as well lolololol. Good try though. The only reason the US knew Iraq had WMD's is because Bush Sr. sold them to Iraq but they were used up when they went in. The U.S has only used nuclear bombs twice though on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to warn Stalin to back off in Europe. The Iranian president has vowed to wipe Jews off the Earth. With the conflict already in that area, I would not doubt him nuking Israel, a major American ally, if he could.

  • @QuantumChaotic That's were your mistaken, President Ahmadinejad said he would wipe the ZIONIST regime which controls Israel and most of the west, secondly Iran is not developing Nuclear Weapons and it has mentioned this over a hundered times and the asshole that lives in the white house can't get his tongue out of zionisms ass to notice. "You should really get to know your history. I'm in History 12 with 100%" You clearly do not know what your talking about.

  • @Vunduva Obama can't leave Israel alone. They pour ridiculous amounts of money in there so they have a friendly country in the Middle East and they have to listen to the Jews living in American who would want the Jews to keep Israel. So, your're going to believe their leader just because he denies have nukes? Every politician lies. You just said Bush lied. Why can't Ahmadinejad lie about it too? That was a hypocritical statement. If he finds a way to get his hand on nukes, bye bye Israel.

  • @Vunduva and I do know what I'm talking about. My history teacher has his major in Arabic history and I only finished that unit last week. He keeps up to date on what happens there and talks about it. I think I believe someone who's an expert in the subject than you. If you think just because Ahmadinejad, who is insane if he has vowed to wipe out the zionist regime, says he isn't developing nuclear weapons then you're just an idiot, but saying that doesn't mean I think he is either.

  • @QuantumChaotic Half of my generation are from Arabia and my religion teaches me about the land of the Arabs and did you know that Iran is NOT an Arab country so i don't know why you are talking about Arabs so you clearly don't know anything about this topic. President Ahmadinejad is not insane all he want's is the benefit of his country and a Nuclear Program is the best option. You believe he is insane because the dodgy western media portray him like that.

  • @Vunduva Whatever, I meant Middle East. I never meant Iran was Arabic. He majors in the middle east. Anyone who vows to wipe a religious group off the face of the earth is insane. Sorry to break it too you. What did Hitler do? I never said the Americans found WMD's or that invading Iraq was right? Why the fuck did you bring that up? I know what the American military does. I don't think anyone should have nukes. They don't do any good.

  • @QuantumChaotic again with the bullshit. iran nor any representative of iran has never said anything about removing any religious group from the face of the earth.

  • @Darusdei Ahmadinejad has vowed to wipe the Zionists (Jews taking over Palestine) off the face of the earth.

  • @QuantumChaotic Why is the USA allowed Nuclear Weapons after its ordeal in Iraq? 1.5 million civilians were killed due to your so called "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" which were never found. If thereis one country on this earth which shouldn't be allowed Nuclear Weapons its the USA. Its also funny how the US starts most of the wars in this world.

  • @Vunduva Bull fucking shit "Its also funny how the US starts most of the wars in this world." That is the most idiodic ill-informed statment I've ever heard in my fucking life. I don't care about willfull ignorance but that is just fucking downright stupidity. Name 4 wars that the U.S actually started... Like really try and name 4 and fyi neither World Wars where started by the U.S, so don't try and use those for the sake of my sanity

  • @Vunduva You should really get to know your history. I'm in History 12 with 100% so don't try to outsmart me. I know what I'm talking about.

  • @Vunduva Your an idiot, you watch the news too much, if you had intel that there could possibly be nuclear weapons in a terrorist run country would you really not go investigate further. Also the U.S has only used Nuclear weapons twice in its history, and they where to basically to take Japan out of WW2, compared to the "goverments" in this area that do public exexutions and threaten to declare WW3, yeah we're the ones that "kill,kill,kill idiot.....

  • @Darkfoxx999 Are you serious? USA is the ONLY country which has ever used there Nuclear Weapons..................My God! your thick. I dont have time to educate you so please go back to school and listen to your teacher this time.

  • @Vunduva Your attempt at hidding your ignorance was very poor. And FYI if we didn't use the twin nuclear bombs to basically end WW2 Germany would of done it in a heartbeat. Thats not wanting to kill thats trying to end the reign on the Third Reich and the Axis Powers.

    We're not the only country in the world to use nukes because we like to kill people its because if we didn't another country which loves to kill people would of done it first

  • @Darkfoxx999 what kind of hollywood bs history is that? japan was ready to surrender way before the atomic weapons...

    you should really try to read up on the matter, before sounding like a 7yearold...

  • @Darusdei Are you stupid? The Japanese army was trained not to surrender. The emperor had no control over them until the bombs were dropped. The army was training civilians to fight guerilla warfare. If the U.S had not dropped the bombs they would have had to massacre the Japanese people. You should read up on the matter. You are totally incorrect.

  • @QuantumChaotic they were trying to surrender before the bombs. this is very apparent when you actually read the diplomatic cables between russia and japan.

    their only condition was that they get to keep their emperor. (which wasn't good enough for the u.s. president) since he wanted unconditional surrender and ultimetaly wanted to use the bombs even when his top advisor was against it... do some reading before calling people stupid...

  • @Darusdei they were not. The Emperor may have been trying to surrender. The Emperor had no control whatsoever over his military. I'm in History 12 with a teacher who majored in this. I have 100%. I know what I'm talking about. The U.S dropped the bombs to stop the military, who were training civilians to fight guerilla style. They would have had to massacre the Japanese to end the war. You should get to know your stuff.

  • @QuantumChaotic According to the US Strategic Bombing Survey, a study commissioned immediately after the war by and for the US government, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not bring about the surrender. Eisenhower, Chief of Staff Leahy, Nimitz, MacArthur and others recommended against using the weapons as unnecessary. The Japanese had been sending out peace feelers through back channels for months and were ready to surrender.

  • @Darusdei Propaganda. The Japanese may have been doing this, but that army wouldn't have been. They fought to the death and were not controlled by anyone other than military officials. Do you not understand that. The bombs forced the army to listen to the Emperor and surrender.

  • @QuantumChaotic propaganda? lol do you even know what propaganda is or what it means?

  • @Darusdei yes I do. You can't believe everything you read and you don't seem to get my point still. The likely rates of death if the U.S had not dropped the bomb are 1 million U.S soldiers and millions of Japanese. I can't quite remember the specific number.

  • @QuantumChaotic there we go. you can't believe things that are historically proven?

    you must believe the 60's propaganda? lol...

    you're talking about estimates about a thing what wasn't even about to happen.you can also read how big of a gamble d-day landing was and how horrific numbers they were willing to accept and how they were going to explain it.

    plus you're talking about civilian targets in war, which ironically makes it a war crime.

  • @Darusdei civilians that were being trained to kill. They are no longer civilians. This is stuff I've learning from my history teacher, who's expertise is in this field. I don't think you have the same qualifications.

  • @QuantumChaotic ooh so that's your 5th grade justification for using atomic weapons on a civilian target? "someone taught them to fight, they're not civilians" you can't be serious...

  • @Darusdei So if a group of people will attack you using guerilla warfare tactics you would still consider them civilians? No matter what you try to bullshit me with I'm not changing my opinion and I think you're an idiot.

  • @QuantumChaotic mate... no one in the world could change your mind. just like the north koreans who truly believe their dear leader is a god.

    it's called indoctrination

  • @Darusdei what does North Korea have to do with this? Plus you didn't answer my question.

  • @QuantumChaotic Really? That's funny! Cause when a soldier is released from the military, he is a civilian again by all accounts of EVERY LAW ever written. Your teacher sounds like he has a nut-so Marine living next to him that saw his friends die and just got through his fifth tour, he is allowed to be a little nuts. I know people like your teacher, you know, morons.

  • @QuantumChaotic They are also bullshit espacially CNN there i9s this bitch that just wants war with Iran, she keeps saying that they could attack us. Facepalm.

  • @Darkfoxx999 The Nazis were out by the time the nukes were dropped. It was dropped on Japan as a warning to the Soviets to stop at Berlin and save Japanese lives. The Japanese were training civilians in guerilla warfare and they had no surrender tactics. So, if the U.S didn't drop the nukes the Japanese would have been massacred. I'm on your side. That guy has no idea what he is saying.

  • @Darkfoxx999 First of all, America was the only country with nuclear weapons until 1949 when the Soviets developed them, second I don't even believe Germany has ever had nuclear weapons, third Germany was all but done in Europe by the time the nukes were dropped. The war with Germany and Japan were two separate wars just in the same time period. The bombs were dropped to force Japan to surrender and scare Stalin so he wouldn't push past Berlin. Get your facts straight.

  • @QuantumChaotic True Germany never technically had nuclear weapons but, compared to the U.S and the Soviet Union at the time, German Scientists where strangly far ahead in-terms of military advancments theres no reason not to think they could have been working on nuclear weapons before we where.

  • @Darkfoxx999 I doubt it. The Manhatten project was top secret. I highly doubt the Germans had the exact same idea as the Americans. It took the Soviets 4 years to develop a nuke after the U.S had dropped theirs. The German scientists were extremely bright, and sick, but I have never heard anything about them developing nukes. I'm sorry to say but you have no idea what you're talking about.

  • @QuantumChaotic Im not going to bother... thinking that the U.S where the only ones capable of developing nukes is.... just..... Ya know what nevermind not going to waste my time.

  • click for funny face 2:30

  • GUNNS should be in politics!!

  • gunns for prime minister!

  • @Indianassasin007 LOL no For President of USA. he

  • @Indianassasin007 LOL, no -.-

  • i used to be a U spy, then i took a arrow to the knee.

  • @a210stoner no just no

  • lolz 41 haters and retards on the rateings :I

  • lol nice intro gunnz, not u, but funny and very proffeshional XD. ur not a news man im sorry lol

  • Dont feel bad 4 Iran: they claimed USA caused 9/11 b4 this tension, attacked UK embassy after sanctions and threatened USA/ UK with actions that would lead to war- USA/ UK has only used sanctions so far- thats not bullying Iran- thats smart. I hope the nuclear talks being set up work as i agree with u on one thing. Avoid war at all cost.

  • @ZzWoOstY the fbi final statement about 9/11 was that there was no evidence that linked it with al qaeda neither with osama, so in the absence of any official theory any theory is equally reliable

  • 41 people took it out on GUNNS

  • Canadian FTW man, glad see to see you represent !!! :D

  • I LIVE IN SAUDI ARABIA

  • The us needs to stop interfering and sort out their own goddam problems . For some reason after WW2 america cant seem to avoid conflict around the world..... first COMMUNISM is the issue and then WEAPONS OF MASS DESCRUTION meanwhile they are fighting a WAR ON TERRORISM and now NUCLEAR WEAPONS what's next ??

  • @megaT2k10 ok after ww2, u may not realize this, but Russia was actually threatening to nuke the US (the cold war , which ended in the 80's ) they went to all those countries to try to stop them from setting up positions where they could attack from . WW3 almost started down in Cuba when russia went there to place nukes. also the WMD's are basically nukes, which was part of the war on terror, so in other words u just said the same thing 3 times

  • @Th3Marksman Nukes were never part of "The War on Terror" you history noob.

  • @nakamine1713 incorrect, the war on terror is a war against terrorist, some of who'm were believed to carry WMD's

  • @Th3Marksman Way to reach for semantics to fail at proving your fail point, history noob. The only Muslim country with nuclear capability at the time of the Iraq War propaganda build up was Pakistan, who weren't as lumped in as they are now. Get your facts straight before you lie and potentially mis-inform, you piece of shit.

  • @nakamine1713 considering you are saying "history noob" i am to presume that you are really young. so that means you probably don't remember the bush administration, and the reason for going into the iran/iraq war (which was apart of the war on terror ) What bush's reasoning for going was "to search for Weapons Of Mass Destruction" (which every one knows that he just wanted the resources) . i was not lying, yes u are entitled to your opinion, but you actually only stated 2 things and not 4.

  • @Th3Marksman I didn't state anything other than that you adhere to the false history created by the media, and even then, you are more than wrong about anyone possessing nukes at the time. You're the type that likes to avoid the point to pathetically paint yourself in the right for some reason. You said they had nukes. They didn't. Not even close. They failed to find ANY WMD's, LMFAO.

  • @nakamine1713 about the first part, my apologies i thought i was talking to megaT2k10 for e second (Fail on my part). Also, did u even read what i typed? i'm not avoid the point. I've stated it. i never said they had nukes.. please re read what i typed.

  • @nakamine1713 .. after you've calmed down, that is.

  • @nakamine1713 just to clarify, since u never did respond im to believe you reread my comment and saw the truth...

  • @Th3Marksman ended in the 90s.

  • @sergio71995 i believe ur right, i couldn't remember if it was late 80's or early 90's

  • @Th3Marksman It was The August of 1991

  • @sergio71995 i know a lot more about the first world war and second then i do the cold war, i knew it was in august i just couldn't remember if it was in 1990-1 or 1989. Thank you for informing me though

  • @sergio71995 actually according to Canadian history it ended in 1989... but i guess every country has its own version of history.

  • @Th3Marksman yeah i mean here in the US its 90 but whatever its ok

  • @Th3Marksman You missed out the vietnam war and the koren war 1950-mid 60s....both divided between communism and cappitalism ... and both times americas (intervention?) onley seemed to cause more bloodshed and the destruction infact the US in the koren war threatend to use their nuclear weapons towards the north koreans and chinese. this was infact the first time ww3 nearly erupted . and now the us are saying iran can't have nuclear cappablitys?

  • @megaT2k10 I wouldn't bother...this child is obviously a sheep, and a supporter of W Bush.

  • @nakamine1713 i dont support Bush at all , and i don't really understand how im a sheep .

  • @megaT2k10 Vietnam and Korean war are considered part of the Cold war, trust me i couldn't miss it my grand father served in Vietnam for the US army and my great uncle served in the Korean war with the CAN army. During that time both the US and USSR were attempting to gain allies and countries. Those wars were 2 occasions where The US and USSR wanted the same country. yes you are right about the WW3 , i wasn't stating that Cuba was the first , but that it was the closest...

  • @megaT2k10 .... also, yes it's stupid. If u look at it from their point of view though, u wouldn't want some one who's not a big fan of you to have a nuke. would you?

  • @megaT2k10 whats next is aliens =P

    but seriously i think americas problem is all the moeny spent on military expenses they have spent more on military expenses than the entire world combined

  • @megaT2k10 Aliens? according to Giorgio Tsoukalos

  • @elvedin999 wut?

  • It's the Illuminati.

  • how can someone as intelligent as you have faggot throat tattoos and bitch earrings.

  • @SolarGamer u mad bro?just because he has tatoos and earrings?

  • Im just tired of people calling the U.S bullies, If we and the rest of NATO didn't do anything no one would, since we all know dam well the U.N is worth its weight in shit. But really is it that fucking hard to see why we do not want nuclear facilties in Iran, it isn't even just because of the Iranian goverment, its simply nuclear production facilities in that fucking area is just a bad idea, I mean terrorist organizations capturing the facilties, or stealing a warhead..I mean shit.....

  • @Darkfoxx999 go sleep then =)

  • Ok I'm going to say this again to all you MOTHER FUCKING IDIOTS. When the U.S doesn't get involved in global affairs everybody else mocks us saying we're "too good for their battles" and shit, BUT when we actually do jump into the FUCKING MESS, YOU MOTHERFUCKERS call us "bullies" and warmongers and shit. You all do realize if Iran cuts off oil tankers from the U.S are economy WILL not might but WILL die, and you fucking call us bullies?????

  • Also, I do not think Iran is the problem with the creation of nuclear weapons in this area. For whatever purpose the Iranian goverment actually wants nuclear material for.. are they able to protect it from terrorist organizations. Lets just say hypothetically Iran makes nuclear material, now what are the odds it would be taken or stolen by a terrorist organization, I mean smack dabb in the center of the Middle East. Terrorist would obviously want to target it and use it against the west?

  • Yeah know what pisses me off EVERY SINGLE MOTHERFUCKING COUNTRY... In the shitty ass United Nations. BLAMES ALL THEIR MOTHERFUCKING PROBLEMS on the United States.. and then we go try and be the good guys and clean up their mess and when we're weak economically, the United Nations basically says "No fuck you... we're not doing anything to help." Or then they blame us and call us "warmongers" WHEN IT WAS THEIR FUCKING PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE

  • The only reason the U.S is bullying iran is because Iran doesn't want to be the next brainless country to give up their sovereignty to America's political agenda. Iran is an independent state and wants peace with other countries! I remember that claim the media made about how he wanted to wipe israel off the map, it was totally FAKE! Iran most likely doesn't hav nuclear weapons, and even if they did their not retarded, they kno that the U.S has enough nukes to flatten all of asia 3 times over!

  • @DORC101 "They want peace" your funny..... they threatened to basically declare war.... Yeah thats peace right there for ya.... Iran is a fucked up country.. in fact every country now-a-days is fucked up.

  • @Darkfoxx999 the US is the most fucked up country in the world, you idiot. you're living in it and you're fucking brainwashed

  • @enticingmuffin Your an idiot blamming all the FUCKING PROBLEMS on the U.S , as far as being fucked up goes every single mother fucking country in the United Nations takes that spot

  • @Darkfoxx999 oh ok thats really logical..."every country in the united nations EXCEPT the US is fucked up". give me a fucking break...you know the US created the UN right? stop watching fox news and learn the real facts...go read some books and statistics and figure out what's really going on in the world... i bet you support rick santorum or mitt romney...it's people like you that are gonna bring this country down to the ground, i swear

  • @enticingmuffin I don't watch Fox the U.S did not create the U.N, the rest of the U.N basically sends us to do everything for them and the people call us warmongers for it. Its not that fucking hard, the U.S has its own problems and we CAN NOT keep being the war-bitch of the European nations. We should do what they did to us and tell them to FUCK OFF. Just pull out of the entire Middle East and let the rest of the U.N fucking deal with it

  • @Darkfoxx999 I agree with you on pulling out of the Middle East...but on everything else you're confusing me. The US actually was behind the creation of the UN, where do you get this info? Also yes, we have more important domestic problems to take care of, but we're responsible for destroying the infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan. We spent so much fucking time going for Osama, and in the end we kill him and what happens? Nothing.

  • @enticingmuffin Well the U.S wasn't the only nation behind the formation of the U.N. I personally think we should take our hand "at least as far as military matters go" out of the Middle East. The only reason why we're still in there is because we're allies with Isreal. If we would just fucking pull out of there, they wouldn't try to attack us, I mean the whole reason why they hate is is because we're on their land.

  • @Darkfoxx999 although the US and CAn has taken most of the troops out at this point

  • @enticingmuffin Also I don't support any politician, the corruption of the U.S goverment is so bad that theres no sense in taking a side because the goverment will do what it wants anyway, since they can always fucking find a "loop-hole" to their own plan of goverment

  • @Darkfoxx999 Yes, most politicians are very corrupt (with the exception of Ron Paul, in my opinion), but the fact that you say that kind of contradicts what you said about the US not having to take the blame. Our corrupt politicians are responsible for most of the shit that goes on in the world. They go against any country that isn't pro-West, and in the process, get into unnecessary wars.

  • @enticingmuffin Um no corruption in the goverment (not just the U.S) is so bad that to even get anywhere as a politician you have to be corrupt. But really we're not responsible for most of the shit that happens. We're always the ones that try to clean it up.. which sometimes it works but most of the time and makes shit worse

  • @Darkfoxx999 think about it, Iran is not retarded, they wouldnt declare war because they know they would get fucked up! It would be a stupid move! I'm not saying that Iran is perfect, you are right they are fucked up, but they hav no reason to declare war on anyone

  • @DORC101 How about hatred of anything "Westren" for many people hatred is enough to start a war... stupid or not.......

  • dislike cause im angry RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH­HHHHH.

  • UMMM Yes we are to say they shouldn't Have Nuclear weapons because, Iran runs On really Bad Dictatorship, and Iran is filled with what we call terrorist, and Nobody want these terrorist getting hands on a Nuke, this is the reason Israel bombed Iran's Nuclear facility in the 1980s because Iran Hated israle and they didnt want iran building this nuclear Power facility.

  • To put it simple.....Nobody Want Iran building these Nuclear weapons because, 1 Iran runs on Dictatorship and, 2 NOBODY WANTS NUCLEAR WAPONS BUILT IN A COUNTRY FILLED WITH TERRORISTS. Iran tried this same thing in the 80s and Freaken IsRale Bombed the Shit out the Nuclear facility, this isnt the first time iran is trying to build a nuclear facility.

  • Hmmmm one question GUNNS, why is the US & Israel allowed to build as many Nuclear Weapons as they wan't?

  • @Vunduva who would stop them?

  • i got a bad feelin (wooooohoooooo)

  • cookies dude here is doing some weed i bet

  • @cookiesandgaming ao u go onto youtube to correct grammar? Hahahahahaha u sad pathetic boy

  • The US fucking SUCKS, I don't really care about any biased comments.

  • Hiding behind the US ? HAHAHAHAHAH lol, UK is In the front line way before the US.

  • @CookiesAndGaming EU too

  • @urbanawp Erm, No country except UK is in the war at the moment.

  • @cookiesandgaming i see u replying to every comment like a fag that u are....someone is an attention whore

  • @hxcdsal89 You're the whore, I had to reply at the POOR ass grammar.

  • @hxcdsal89 For the record thanks for calling me a cigarette

  • I thought this guy just spoke about video games... What is this?

  • feel bad for Iran? They openly want to destroy Isreal and will if they get nukes.

  • If you believe Iran cares about anything other than their own political power you are foolish.

  • Comment removed

  • gunz please have an opinion seems ur scared to give it. you will state something but then go bak on it like ur scared the other side will bash you stick to your gunz

  • Neils 4 CNN.!

  • that phone sound was perfect xD