Poviem to takto, gol to v ziadnom pripade NEBOL lebo puk nepresiel brankovou ciarou ale preto lebo vnutro branky bolo zle spravene cize KEBY bolo spravne spravene vnutro puk by skoncil v branke. Cize podla mojho nazoru gol sa uznat nemal pretoze nebol v branke a neviem ako to maju v pravidlach podla mna by v tom pripade mal byt zapas skontumovany v prospech trenicna
viete co?ste tu všetci smiešny trenčania sprosty ktory si myslia ze to gol bol..Zuzlik48 ma pravdu.Ved to je jasne ze to gol nebol..Este v americkom vyskumno centre to potvrdili ze to gol nebol.Takže sa vsetci trencania strcte do pice kokoti.
Ci stojis za brankou nie je podstatne, kazdy zaber jednoznacne preukazal gol podla definicie - v istom okamihu je dokonca vidiet, ze puk opustil ciaru. To ale nie je podstatne, potrestal by som MHC Martin za zlu konstrukciu branky, ktora puk smerujuci do brany odrazi naspat este v okamihu kedy to nie je jednoznacne viditelne bez videa. A samozrejme gol bol regulerne uznany za co si zasluzi uznanie videorozhodca a aj hlavny.
Nechapem, co sa tu riesilo. Rozhodca to povedal jasne. Puk sa odrazil od bodu na branke, ktory ma byt podla pravidiel vzdialeny od ciary 8*cm, priemer puku je 7*, cize regulerny gol. Martin si mal lepsie nakreslit ciary.
* udaj orientacny, viem ze bod bol dalej ako priemer puku
Vlaaaasto Lakosil !!! MHC my to o rok aj tak vyhrame... neviem ci niekto postrehol ze videorozhodca z tohto zapasu sa narodil v Trencine... preco niekoho takeho dali piskat?
to by ma zaujimalo ktoze to piskal, davaj napis jeho meno, kde si som cital zevraj bol videorozhodcom pán Marušin, no ak myslíš toho tak ťa sklamem on je totiž z Popradu.
kosice sice zvratili seriu z 3:0 na 3:3, ale pis si co chces :P
btw, tie prve 3 zapasy len pustili, aby bola dramatickejia seria, inak by slovanu dali kapky 4:0. a zdenov sportovy prejav, ked poslal rozhodcov do riti dufam coskoro uvidime na youtube :D:D:D:D smial som sa ako nikdy.
Of course it is a goal, since it touched a part inside the goal. The goals are incredibly stupidly designed though, that whitet padding shouldn't be all the way out to the posts like that.
now i dont understand any of what is being said here, but for all us people who speak english, this is obviously not a goal. the puck did not cross the line all the way. its common sense, how could it have hit the post, crossed the red line, and then hit the other post and bounce out. its impossible. the puck simply followed the line down to the other post and bounced out.
it is hard to see with this low quality video, but puck bounced out of the white lining (or how to call it) inside net (check video at around 2:04 - 2:14 time)
Krasna seria toto bola a nasa milovana Dukla z nej vysla. Zato mam repsekt pred Martinom lebo takto dobre som ich este hrat nevidel. Gratulujem Dukla respekt Martinu
hm ja som fandil Dukle a som spokojny no takymto nahodakom sa to nemalo skoncit a lutujem Lakosila urcite ho to riadne vzalo ale inak super seria kde sa hrabe nhl co???
Martin bol trňom v oku viacerým..hral pekný hokej...gol to podľa mňa nebol a Kubuš sa unahlil nemal vôbec prerušiť hru..Trenčinu by takýto gol určite neuznal...je to šport nech vyhrá lepši ale nie takto..Martin si takyto koniec určite nezaslúžil...
008martin podlateba, ale ty nevies ake zabery mal videorozhodca k dispozicii, mal urcite lepsie ako tento. podlamna bol verdikt spravny, kdesi bolo aj graficky znazornene na fore ze bol za ciarou, co uz, predrokom slovanu uznal Marušin gol ktory bol odost jasnejsi ze nemal platit....ale aj tak prajem vela stastia MHC v dalsej sezone. :)
Je to tazke,ale keby som bol rozhodca,asi by som ho neuznal.Aj ked asi zlomok sekundy bol za brankovou ciarou.Smola.Chudak Lakosil.Skvela seria,super hokej.
to bola naozaj nahoda ale hold taki je hokej aj to musi bit ale nepochibil len kalosil aj kovac ked dostal ten gol na 2:2 stava sa to aj tym najlepsim. tesime sa na slovan DUKLA GO
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hold your ground! Hold your ground! Sons of Trencin, my brothers! I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day could come when the courage of Dukla fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship. But it is not this day. An hour of shepherds and shattered hockey sticks, when the age of Dukla Trencin comes crashing down. But it is not this day! This day we fight! By all that you hold dear on this good town, I bid you stand, Men of the Trencin!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Preklad: Neustupujte! Drzte sa! Synovia Trencina, vidim vam na ociach rovnaky strach aky by vzal odvahu mne. Mozno raz pride den, kedy odvaha Dukly zlyha, ked opustime svojich priatelov, pretrhame stare zvazky. Ale dnes to nebude. Hodina pastierov a roztriestenych hokejok, kedy sa vek Trencina zruti. Ale dnes to nebude! Dnes budeme bojovat! Pri vsetkom co je vam na tomto meste drahe, vyzyvam vas stojte, muzi Trencina!
goal
misozvychodnej 6 months ago
to nemal byť gól lebo puk nebol celým objmom za čiarou to je aj v pravidlách hokeja :D
1990kubo 10 months ago
mna by zaujimalu kde to najdem cele ako aj s tym rozhodnutim rozhodcu :)
veronika0123456789 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ja by som chcel videť to ako to rozhodol rozhodca nemate to niekto ak ano prosim pošli te mi to na veragabrielova@gmail.com
veronika0123456789 1 year ago
Lukas Riha (player MHC Martin) became player Aksam Unia Oświęcim !!!!!! YEEAAA :) Greetings from Oswiecim :)
Szymoon7 1 year ago
ááááááj Vlasta prodal..:(
Cabrt41 1 year ago
Poviem to takto, gol to v ziadnom pripade NEBOL lebo puk nepresiel brankovou ciarou ale preto lebo vnutro branky bolo zle spravene cize KEBY bolo spravne spravene vnutro puk by skoncil v branke. Cize podla mojho nazoru gol sa uznat nemal pretoze nebol v branke a neviem ako to maju v pravidlach podla mna by v tom pripade mal byt zapas skontumovany v prospech trenicna
BeowulfSlovakia 2 years ago
viete co?ste tu všetci smiešny trenčania sprosty ktory si myslia ze to gol bol..Zuzlik48 ma pravdu.Ved to je jasne ze to gol nebol..Este v americkom vyskumno centre to potvrdili ze to gol nebol.Takže sa vsetci trencania strcte do pice kokoti.
2178jumro2178 2 years ago
@2178jumro2178 ty kokot jeblôy ten gol bol ty kokot
veronika0123456789 11 months ago
Ano máš pravdu ale mal byt dôraznejší a nebolo by to sporné.
dukinko 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tak pri tomto gole som stala za brankou a gol to na milion percent nebol... ale co uz... tuto sezonu im to vratime aj s urokami!!! MHC foreveeer!!!!
zuzlik48 3 years ago
Ci stojis za brankou nie je podstatne, kazdy zaber jednoznacne preukazal gol podla definicie - v istom okamihu je dokonca vidiet, ze puk opustil ciaru. To ale nie je podstatne, potrestal by som MHC Martin za zlu konstrukciu branky, ktora puk smerujuci do brany odrazi naspat este v okamihu kedy to nie je jednoznacne viditelne bez videa. A samozrejme gol bol regulerne uznany za co si zasluzi uznanie videorozhodca a aj hlavny.
ramesse83 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
skurveny trencin joj ket vidim ze DUKLA TRENCIN ma ide jebnut do pice snimi pojebane ovce
arvo48 3 years ago
Keby hráč číslo 12 nedvihal predčasne ruky definitivne by tam ten pok dorazil :D a bolo by po spornom momente
dukinko 3 years ago
tupci tupiiiiii precitajte si najprv pravidla ligy a potom hovorte ci to bol alebo nebol gol..
AliraeL15 3 years ago 6
@AliraeL15 Přesně tak !
McMaJkY 1 year ago
chlape, krásne videjko, chýba tam ešte smutný Říhov ksicht ..
BigMikeSVK 3 years ago 12
What I think we need here is MORE advertising. Holy cripes pepole, this is WORSE than NASCAR.
vande23 3 years ago
That goalie is a good puck handler...NOT!!
Tombzy 3 years ago
nasrat mu do ruk a k vode nepustit, straaaasne to smrdi umyselnym vlastencom. Ojebavac Lakosil, takto predat cele mesto, no nech ide do faka
zlosynn 3 years ago
Nechapem, co sa tu riesilo. Rozhodca to povedal jasne. Puk sa odrazil od bodu na branke, ktory ma byt podla pravidiel vzdialeny od ciary 8*cm, priemer puku je 7*, cize regulerny gol. Martin si mal lepsie nakreslit ciary.
* udaj orientacny, viem ze bod bol dalej ako priemer puku
Ozmarik 3 years ago
old saying score now celebrate later
stillchiodofan40 3 years ago
thats not a goal, close tho
pizzabox24 3 years ago
Vlaaaasto Lakosil !!! MHC my to o rok aj tak vyhrame... neviem ci niekto postrehol ze videorozhodca z tohto zapasu sa narodil v Trencine... preco niekoho takeho dali piskat?
Mareq77 3 years ago
to by ma zaujimalo ktoze to piskal, davaj napis jeho meno, kde si som cital zevraj bol videorozhodcom pán Marušin, no ak myslíš toho tak ťa sklamem on je totiž z Popradu.
DeltyM8 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
slovan neporazi nik
chalupar11 3 years ago
kosice sice zvratili seriu z 3:0 na 3:3, ale pis si co chces :P
btw, tie prve 3 zapasy len pustili, aby bola dramatickejia seria, inak by slovanu dali kapky 4:0. a zdenov sportovy prejav, ked poslal rozhodcov do riti dufam coskoro uvidime na youtube :D:D:D:D smial som sa ako nikdy.
mafto 3 years ago
Goal I guess..the puck crosses the line. Very close one..
NordhessenPower36 3 years ago 7
it is a goal ofcorse
RadovanVrana 3 years ago
Comment veux-tu que la rondelle revienne en dehors si elle est rentré !????
quebec392 3 years ago
no goal
quebec392 3 years ago 2
Of course it is a goal, since it touched a part inside the goal. The goals are incredibly stupidly designed though, that whitet padding shouldn't be all the way out to the posts like that.
BrainPaiN2 3 years ago
by rules the "white padding" must be at least 10 cm behind the line... Puck is 7-8 cm
onlysexy 3 years ago
it just crossed the line.. justttt
doncruzz 3 years ago
goooooool
lacino9 3 years ago
No goal
Easter90 3 years ago
definite goal. barely crossed the line though
wroyals07 3 years ago
no goal
samlovessk8boading 3 years ago
Kua chalani...a kde je to rozhodnutie...? :)
Dusko007 3 years ago
Kua chalani...a kde je to rozhodnutie...? :)
Dusko007 3 years ago
If you pause at 1:10 the puck clearly crossed the line.
1Amiel1 3 years ago
i say no goal but thats me.
NYR005 3 years ago
that looks like no goail
narutoloversrock 3 years ago
is this in checz republic ? sorry if i spelt it wrong
lahnaclannb 3 years ago
Slovak Republic
DeltyM8 3 years ago
No, it´s Slovakia (btw you have that in video describtion)
Ntsbhdb 3 years ago
aj keby posledne 2 goly neplatili, aj tak by sme vyhrali... DUKLA!TRENCIN!
liwushka 3 years ago
their uniforms are pretty crazy
rennob94 3 years ago
now i dont understand any of what is being said here, but for all us people who speak english, this is obviously not a goal. the puck did not cross the line all the way. its common sense, how could it have hit the post, crossed the red line, and then hit the other post and bounce out. its impossible. the puck simply followed the line down to the other post and bounced out.
rlmhockey39 3 years ago
it is hard to see with this low quality video, but puck bounced out of the white lining (or how to call it) inside net (check video at around 2:04 - 2:14 time)
JCik68 3 years ago
you're right.it is not goal!!!understant stupid TN fans???
buco1983 1 year ago
Krasna seria toto bola a nasa milovana Dukla z nej vysla. Zato mam repsekt pred Martinom lebo takto dobre som ich este hrat nevidel. Gratulujem Dukla respekt Martinu
denisslovakia 3 years ago
suhlasim s DeltyM8 videorozhodca mal urcite lepsie zabery jak je tento tu a mal to preco uznat
manikos777 3 years ago
Pre vsetkych expertov, gol to bol, precitajte si pravidla IIHF o konstrukcii branky a uznavani golov... mne sa to tu nechce rozoberat
ramesse83 3 years ago
hm ja som fandil Dukle a som spokojny no takymto nahodakom sa to nemalo skoncit a lutujem Lakosila urcite ho to riadne vzalo ale inak super seria kde sa hrabe nhl co???
matwej1234 3 years ago 2
thats not a goal, the puck wasnt completly over the red line
impulsedmike 3 years ago
Martin bol trňom v oku viacerým..hral pekný hokej...gol to podľa mňa nebol a Kubuš sa unahlil nemal vôbec prerušiť hru..Trenčinu by takýto gol určite neuznal...je to šport nech vyhrá lepši ale nie takto..Martin si takyto koniec určite nezaslúžil...
smartie787 3 years ago
ano a ten gol z ofsajdu nikoho netrapi co.video rozhodca asi gol videl nie?preco by ho inac uznal
dREAMER1717 3 years ago
008martin podlateba, ale ty nevies ake zabery mal videorozhodca k dispozicii, mal urcite lepsie ako tento. podlamna bol verdikt spravny, kdesi bolo aj graficky znazornene na fore ze bol za ciarou, co uz, predrokom slovanu uznal Marušin gol ktory bol odost jasnejsi ze nemal platit....ale aj tak prajem vela stastia MHC v dalsej sezone. :)
DeltyM8 3 years ago
smola, ale taky je hokej..pekna seria, martin ju mohol rozhodnut, ale asi nechceli..nemali taku tuzbu vyhrat..
gol bol regularny, skoda lakosil..
pawlatschka 3 years ago 4
Je to tazke,ale keby som bol rozhodca,asi by som ho neuznal.Aj ked asi zlomok sekundy bol za brankovou ciarou.Smola.Chudak Lakosil.Skvela seria,super hokej.
Sicksoul1357 3 years ago
podla mna to gol nebol, PUK NEBOL CELY OBJEMOM V BRANKE!!! Kto to nevidi nech ide ku ocnemu. Kusok bol na ciare!
008martin008 3 years ago
pre bohaaaa... :´O takaaa smola... :(:(:( este stake sa ma drzi smuutok.. :( lakosilko chudaciiik :*
tomasmad 3 years ago
Velmi stastny gol.Verim tomu ze keby nepadol,Martin by vyhral
kaposh4 3 years ago
asi tak Pan prstenov je lepsi ako Trencin
Hees3 3 years ago
to bola naozaj nahoda ale hold taki je hokej aj to musi bit ale nepochibil len kalosil aj kovac ked dostal ten gol na 2:2 stava sa to aj tym najlepsim. tesime sa na slovan DUKLA GO
pepko89 3 years ago
chudak lakosil.....je mi ho uprimne strasne luto...toto si nezasluzil=o(
richie0411 3 years ago 4
pekny gol... v podstate celkom jasny a rozhodca ho nemohol neuznat, cela ta seria by si vsak zasluzila ine vyvrcholenie...
manique1983 3 years ago 2
thats was unlucky.
rasiova 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tntealc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tntealc 3 years ago
fandila som obom muzstvam, ale hovadit tu LOTRa nemusis
TobiasFreak 3 years ago 3