KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you.
I will never understand how a man can make a profession of faith in Christ and then spend his remaining years denying the existence of God's faith producing scriptures in a complete, accessible and inerrant form. Utter madness.
The quadricentenary King James Bible possesses numerous drawbacks and shortcomings, being an antiquated 400-year-old Anglican translation which utilizes Elizabethan prose and is completely disconnected from contemporary English-speaking laypeople, incorporating multitudinous Medieval-period archaisms, translational errata, archaic phraseology, translational inconsistencies, and unjustifiable omissions. Its Shakespearean constructions and terminologies are outdated, cumbersome, and unforgivable.
@TheHeroOfChrist I'm sorry, I had to laugh at your conceited crap you just threw up. I guess if all that you said is true (which it certainly isn't), then its a wonder why God chose to lead more people to Christ in 400 years with a KJV (which you believe is ONLY a translation) than he chose to lead to Christ with the originals. Strange God we serve.
@TheHeroOfChrist But not not nearly as objectionable as your pompous, overblown and self indulgent objections to it. Get over your self. God resisteth the proud, but he giveth grace unto the humble. But you Aca Demia Rul Es boys always were given to an excessive sense of self impotance.
So, what? Hand placed type by candle light. They went back and fixed it. (using the manuscripts the translators wrote BY HAND.) Seen the NEW (and improved) NIV 2011? They changed it to agree with the KJV! 2 Samuel 21:19. The KJV is God's preserved Words in English, "purified 7 times in a furnace of earth". Pure and preserved.
What is the predominant versions of the Bible in French, German, Italian, Russian, Portuguese, Arabic? If they're not translated from the KJV aren't they all corrupted? We should denounce every translation in every language that isn't directly translated from the KJV. Translating from the original Greek and Hebrew directly can only result in major errors. Even if you are fluent in the original languages you should read the KJV instead because it is more accurate...Doe's this sound logical?
@Benetl What Greek and Hebrew are you talking about? Have you seen the NEW AND IMPROVED NIV 2011?They changed some more bible! This time around they changed 2 Samuel 21:19 to AGREE WITH THE KJV! CBT seems to have caved, regardless of what manuscripts are used. KJV is the preserved word in English. It is a matter of FAITH in what the Lord Jesus said--You either believe HIM or you don't! Why don't you just tell HIM "your words are not pure, Holy and preserved like you said." I dare you!
@locustweed The original language IS preserved. This doesn't mean that it HAS to be preserved in English. According to your logic since the KJV wasn't published until after 1611 then God didn't preserve His word before that date...Yes I've listened to your entire line of reasoning and when all is said and done it's still just an emotional justification to hold on to a faulty belief. Jesus didn't argue with the Pharisees, He reproved them. Believe what you will. I'm done arguing about this.
Choose your battles C A R E F U L L Y Brethren... Remember, if a doctrine is not of God, then it is from another source... and it will, of itself, come to naught.
@quickpost12345 If God doesn't breathe out something, its DEAD, so you are reading a bunch of DEAD "bibles." Brilliant. But you'll quote the verse that says "The word of God is alive..." hahaha, yah, too bad you don't have it, because only the originals were inspired. SIgh. Too bad.
@ChadTheBerean it was a printing error. That's why there are revisions--to correct printing errors and to standardize spelling. We use the 1769 AV today.
For one thousand years the church promoted the latin vulgate as the only true word of God, the scriptures were not allowed to be translated into any other language; it seems to me that Satan is up to his old tricks. Remember, the english bible in its complete form OT/NT did not make its appearance until King Henry authorized it in 1538. 5 other English translations preceded the KJV, starting with John wycliffs NT translation in 1380
There is only one version of the King James Bible. There are, of course, many editions.
The printers in 1611 accidentally missed the word "not" at Ezekiel 24:7. It was quickly corrected, and it appears in 1613.
The King James Bible was correct in 1611, even though there were problems in the presentation of it. The good news is that editors have worked hard to ensure that all the printing mistakes are gone, and that all the spelling is standardised, and that the regularisation is complete.
These parties never take into consideration the purification process spoken of within the scriptures themselves. The KJV was edited for punctuation, and spelling, but was NOT a revision of the actual text, unlike all the modern perversions.
The Authorized KJV 1611 is the only translation left from the original hebrew OT and greek NT. All other translations, including NKJV, NIV, NAS, and literally EVERY translation is from the vaticanus, sinaiticus, and alexandrian text from rome and egypt (both of which have fought Gods word fiercely). These text are Gnostic in origin, and Gnosticism is satans lie in the garden of eden. This doesnt mean God can save anyway, but none the less, they are tampered versions of Gods Word.
Just realized i made a typo, last sentence: This doesnt mean God cant save anyway... There were people trying to corrupt the Word of God even while the Apostles were still alive (2 Corinthians 2:17 says so). But even Secular history of the Bible shows the Antioch (pure) and the Alexandrian of Egypt. This is accepted history. Look it up. Im not attacking anyone, just stating facts as. I am not right. You are not right. Only the Truth is right. Need we talk about the Bible's of Rome?
Just so happens when 2 Corinthians was being written, that is when the Alexandrian text were being written, and thats where the Vaticanus and Sinicanus came from, and this is where all the new translations came from. There is a reason why so many were killed for having a KJV. You are right that not all KJVs are the same because it was still being edited for typos etc until the 1670s. Look at Matt 5:22 in a kjv, and any other new version. Dan 3:25 in kjv and look it up in niv... takes out Jesus
Weird how people down my comments when I state facts that go against what they believe. Im not attacking anyone... you can use what ever Bible you want, but there are changes. Im not saying your not Christian. You may get some truth out of the others, but disinfo is 98%truth and 2%lies to discredit the truth... Like rat poison is 98% good food 2% cyanide. Prove me wrong about the translations... Its true, so why be so upset. I dont have to sit on a translation committee to know these facts.
He wasnt saying Rom 1 22 had anything to do with translations... He was giving you a clue that by your attitude you profess to be wise, and are therefore blinded. Of course the KJV isnt mentioned in the Bible... Because it is a translation of the Bible: The original hebrew OT, and the original Greek NT. Of course kjv is not mentioned in Hebrew and Greek, because it didnt exist before 1600s... It is a translation: the ONLY one from the original hebrew and greek. The rest are as I mentioned.
@Ipreachfromscripts Go back to school! King James is called Jacobus Rex in Latin. Greek words and names have variations- Oh, never heard of "Greek Dynamic Equivalency" before? Geneva Bible says the same thing! Go back to school! You also don't know that the letter "J" didn't exist in Jesus Christ day. Go back to school...
KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you.
davegooley 1 month ago
I will never understand how a man can make a profession of faith in Christ and then spend his remaining years denying the existence of God's faith producing scriptures in a complete, accessible and inerrant form. Utter madness.
mwilson70201 1 month ago
wow. that's convincing.
i'll burn my KJV today and dust off my NIV.
BOOB
skoobalon 4 months ago
The quadricentenary King James Bible possesses numerous drawbacks and shortcomings, being an antiquated 400-year-old Anglican translation which utilizes Elizabethan prose and is completely disconnected from contemporary English-speaking laypeople, incorporating multitudinous Medieval-period archaisms, translational errata, archaic phraseology, translational inconsistencies, and unjustifiable omissions. Its Shakespearean constructions and terminologies are outdated, cumbersome, and unforgivable.
TheHeroOfChrist 9 months ago
@TheHeroOfChrist I'm sorry, I had to laugh at your conceited crap you just threw up. I guess if all that you said is true (which it certainly isn't), then its a wonder why God chose to lead more people to Christ in 400 years with a KJV (which you believe is ONLY a translation) than he chose to lead to Christ with the originals. Strange God we serve.
jondabill1 7 months ago
@TheHeroOfChrist But not not nearly as objectionable as your pompous, overblown and self indulgent objections to it. Get over your self. God resisteth the proud, but he giveth grace unto the humble. But you Aca Demia Rul Es boys always were given to an excessive sense of self impotance.
mwilson70201 1 month ago
So, what? Hand placed type by candle light. They went back and fixed it. (using the manuscripts the translators wrote BY HAND.) Seen the NEW (and improved) NIV 2011? They changed it to agree with the KJV! 2 Samuel 21:19. The KJV is God's preserved Words in English, "purified 7 times in a furnace of earth". Pure and preserved.
locustweed 10 months ago
What is the predominant versions of the Bible in French, German, Italian, Russian, Portuguese, Arabic? If they're not translated from the KJV aren't they all corrupted? We should denounce every translation in every language that isn't directly translated from the KJV. Translating from the original Greek and Hebrew directly can only result in major errors. Even if you are fluent in the original languages you should read the KJV instead because it is more accurate...Doe's this sound logical?
Benetleilaxyz 10 months ago 2
@Benetl What Greek and Hebrew are you talking about? Have you seen the NEW AND IMPROVED NIV 2011?They changed some more bible! This time around they changed 2 Samuel 21:19 to AGREE WITH THE KJV! CBT seems to have caved, regardless of what manuscripts are used. KJV is the preserved word in English. It is a matter of FAITH in what the Lord Jesus said--You either believe HIM or you don't! Why don't you just tell HIM "your words are not pure, Holy and preserved like you said." I dare you!
locustweed 10 months ago
@locustweed The original language IS preserved. This doesn't mean that it HAS to be preserved in English. According to your logic since the KJV wasn't published until after 1611 then God didn't preserve His word before that date...Yes I've listened to your entire line of reasoning and when all is said and done it's still just an emotional justification to hold on to a faulty belief. Jesus didn't argue with the Pharisees, He reproved them. Believe what you will. I'm done arguing about this.
Benetleilaxyz 9 months ago
Choose your battles C A R E F U L L Y Brethren... Remember, if a doctrine is not of God, then it is from another source... and it will, of itself, come to naught.
MeInTheCornfield 1 year ago
Was this a mistranslation or an error on the printers end (which was VERY common)?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
@ChadTheBerean, only the autographs are inspired.
quickpost12345 1 year ago
@quickpost12345 If God doesn't breathe out something, its DEAD, so you are reading a bunch of DEAD "bibles." Brilliant. But you'll quote the verse that says "The word of God is alive..." hahaha, yah, too bad you don't have it, because only the originals were inspired. SIgh. Too bad.
jondabill1 7 months ago
@ChadTheBerean it was a printing error. That's why there are revisions--to correct printing errors and to standardize spelling. We use the 1769 AV today.
filoIII 1 year ago
For one thousand years the church promoted the latin vulgate as the only true word of God, the scriptures were not allowed to be translated into any other language; it seems to me that Satan is up to his old tricks. Remember, the english bible in its complete form OT/NT did not make its appearance until King Henry authorized it in 1538. 5 other English translations preceded the KJV, starting with John wycliffs NT translation in 1380
lkevins1 2 years ago
There is only one version of the King James Bible. There are, of course, many editions.
The printers in 1611 accidentally missed the word "not" at Ezekiel 24:7. It was quickly corrected, and it appears in 1613.
The King James Bible was correct in 1611, even though there were problems in the presentation of it. The good news is that editors have worked hard to ensure that all the printing mistakes are gone, and that all the spelling is standardised, and that the regularisation is complete.
bibleprotector 2 years ago 2
AMEN.
These parties never take into consideration the purification process spoken of within the scriptures themselves. The KJV was edited for punctuation, and spelling, but was NOT a revision of the actual text, unlike all the modern perversions.
kjvonly01 2 years ago
lol, purification process.
...riiiiight....
quickpost12345 2 years ago
Ps:12:6: The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7: Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
8: The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.
Let God be true. But then again, the wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.
You are your own final authority. God calls you a fool.
Rom:1:22: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
kjvonly01 2 years ago
@kjvonly01,
lets quote random bible verses!! lol.
You don't even know what Romans 1:22 is saying.
CLUE: it's got nothing to do with bible translations.
the KJV is just one translation, no different from any other. it isn't even mentioned in the bible itself.
quickpost12345 2 years ago
The Authorized KJV 1611 is the only translation left from the original hebrew OT and greek NT. All other translations, including NKJV, NIV, NAS, and literally EVERY translation is from the vaticanus, sinaiticus, and alexandrian text from rome and egypt (both of which have fought Gods word fiercely). These text are Gnostic in origin, and Gnosticism is satans lie in the garden of eden. This doesnt mean God can save anyway, but none the less, they are tampered versions of Gods Word.
dankeewolnir4042 2 years ago
@dankee,
what are your credentials - what translation committees have you sat on?
quickpost12345 2 years ago
Just realized i made a typo, last sentence: This doesnt mean God cant save anyway... There were people trying to corrupt the Word of God even while the Apostles were still alive (2 Corinthians 2:17 says so). But even Secular history of the Bible shows the Antioch (pure) and the Alexandrian of Egypt. This is accepted history. Look it up. Im not attacking anyone, just stating facts as. I am not right. You are not right. Only the Truth is right. Need we talk about the Bible's of Rome?
dankeewolnir4042 2 years ago
Just so happens when 2 Corinthians was being written, that is when the Alexandrian text were being written, and thats where the Vaticanus and Sinicanus came from, and this is where all the new translations came from. There is a reason why so many were killed for having a KJV. You are right that not all KJVs are the same because it was still being edited for typos etc until the 1670s. Look at Matt 5:22 in a kjv, and any other new version. Dan 3:25 in kjv and look it up in niv... takes out Jesus
dankeewolnir4042 2 years ago
Weird how people down my comments when I state facts that go against what they believe. Im not attacking anyone... you can use what ever Bible you want, but there are changes. Im not saying your not Christian. You may get some truth out of the others, but disinfo is 98%truth and 2%lies to discredit the truth... Like rat poison is 98% good food 2% cyanide. Prove me wrong about the translations... Its true, so why be so upset. I dont have to sit on a translation committee to know these facts.
dankeewolnir4042 2 years ago
@dankeewolnir4042 Why was the NKJV ever allowed to come into existence?
rightlydivide08 9 months ago
He wasnt saying Rom 1 22 had anything to do with translations... He was giving you a clue that by your attitude you profess to be wise, and are therefore blinded. Of course the KJV isnt mentioned in the Bible... Because it is a translation of the Bible: The original hebrew OT, and the original Greek NT. Of course kjv is not mentioned in Hebrew and Greek, because it didnt exist before 1600s... It is a translation: the ONLY one from the original hebrew and greek. The rest are as I mentioned.
dankeewolnir4042 2 years ago
@quickpost12345
the most glowing example, Jesus name was not Jesus it was Joshua.
yet kjv being perfect in all forgot this "inspired"fact
Ipreachfromscripts 2 years ago
@Ipreachfromscripts Go back to school! King James is called Jacobus Rex in Latin. Greek words and names have variations- Oh, never heard of "Greek Dynamic Equivalency" before? Geneva Bible says the same thing! Go back to school! You also don't know that the letter "J" didn't exist in Jesus Christ day. Go back to school...
locustweed 10 months ago
@locustweed yes your right it was yeshua, funny how they spelled it right in the old but yet some how thy get it wrong in the new?
Ipreachfromscripts 8 months ago