Barack Obama TOWN HALL MEETING in Fairless Hills, PA-Part 7

[mandy26lez]

bring your eggs and tomatoes to the obama townhall meetings! barry still thinks he is doing a great job the people need to tell him otherwise!

[raoulhery]

obama is done!! he failed to bring changes time to punish him this november

[GalwayRose1]

Why do you sweet talk to this lovely lady. When you went to College, you will not open your records WHY ARE THEY SEALED?? MR. PRESIDENT OPEN THEM.

[Rich1598]

@GalwayRose1 His records are not sealed but can you read?

[GalwayRose1]

@Rich1598 . Nasty! Post his three College transcripts, i.e, if you can read?? Only added that remark because you did. Sorry.

Dr..........................

[oldjoe5]

muslims on the planet will not sit there and watch Israel take over all the oil fields in the Middle East. Hence, the existence of Israel = WWIII = the end of mankind.

So no, I don't think there should be a Jewish State.

[IronLion27]

I didn't ask why there shouldn't be a Jewish state in the middle east. I asked why you think there shouldn't be one in general. And believe me We don't own all the money and the media in the world. I live in a pretty poor neigborhood.

[oldjoe5]

occupy the US congress. No "viable" US candidate for Congress of President can ever speak ill of Israel or try to stop the billions of US taxpayer dollars given in gifts to that country very single year.

So Israel is in control of the world's only militayrrsuperpower and uses this leverage to engage in her blood lust hatred of all things arag and muslim. She is an insane nation that does not knwo when to stop. This will eventually lead to WWIII as China, Russia, India and the billion

[aircooledbusnut]

Wow, so scripted

[Mmixer2008]

Federalize the Student Loan program... so you can decide WHO get's loans.... Federalize Health Care and make life/death decisions. Forgiveness for AmeriCorp on the debt... how many religious organizations are on the list of "worthy" outfits?

[jds7467]

This guy is a piece of work......he wants to stop this and add that....Has anyone bothered to wonder WHERE he is going to get this money? Nothing in this life is free, you might want to pull your head out of your fourth point of contact. ALL AMERICANS will be taxed to support this crap, DEMS included. Wealth envy is no way to change this problem, and if you believe that European Socialism is the way to go, then I'd suggest you start paying attention to what is going on in Germany.

[oldjoe5]

Same place Bush admin got it to give two massive tax cuts to those who least need it, the uber rich (i.e., his "base') and to launch a several trillion dollar war based on the false premise of WMDs?

[iac821]

Dirty politics? Take a look at what Karl Rove did with Dubya in office. Do you all remember 2002 when we were gearing up for war in iraq? Everyone was saying we have to support our president. It's unpatriotic not too. Even though he got us involved in a war over wmds that didn't even exist. During his campaign Barack said that he was going to try things, if they work great,if not well change them until they do. What a concept, we need some changes in this country

[gshowecom]

The same people are in charge, regardless of party or name. They are the central bankers who profit from our debt and manipulate the markets to their advantage. Our founders warned us that if we ever allow "them" to set up a central bank, they would rob us blind! President Halfblack Obama is not in charge nor was Bushy. They work for the same group that has been in power since around 1913. The sooner people realize this, the more hope we'll all have.

[denalaurens]

Obama says one thing and does another. The troops are still in Iraq, aren't they. Obama is a liar. Mustard gas that Hussein was using on his own people is a weapon of mass destruction and lethal. As for gearing up for the war, Liberal Congress agreed there were WMD and they all voted for it. It takes Congress to determine how much $ goes toward war. The change obama was talking about was changing America to a socialist country. He can keep the change. He is a trojan horse to sabotage the USA.

[oldjoe5]

You mean the gas Saddma used in the 80s on the Kurds and which resulted in Reagan/Bush increasing US financial support for Saddam and which was destroyed after Gulf War I? That gas?

[denalaurens]

The mustard gas attack occured way after Reagan/Bush, who helped Iraq defend against the intrusion of Russia. So get the timing right.

[oldjoe5]

Actually, the gassing of the Kurds by Saddam took place in March of 1988, the last year of the Reagan admin, one year before GHW Bush was president.

And there was not "intrusion" of Iraq by Russia. 

Other than that, well thought out comment

[denalaurens]

Reagan wasn't in office when the attacks occured. The materials for the gas didn't come from the U.S. so are you blaming America for the gassing? Any help the U.S. gave to Iraq for self-defense came before the tyranny of hussen and those who are now called taliban. want to see how dems reacted to WMD?

[oldjoe5]

Actually, Reagan was in office in March nof 1988, when the Kurds were gassed by saddam. He may not have been in his right mind, but he was in office.

US gave Saddam plenty of aid as long as he was killing Iranians.

I don't think you have gotten one statement of history right yet. I don't get it? I mean, you can google, can't you?

[denalaurens]

will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

[oldjoe5]

Dena. NO WMDs. You fell for a lie. Face up to it.

[CJurasin]

iac: Do you have ANY idea how many Democrats ALSO agreed there were WMDs in Iraq before the second war, INCLUDING Hillary, Gore and MANY OTHERS???? Obviously NOT!!!

[oldjoe5]

Psss.

There were no WMDS, no matter who did or did not say what.

[CJurasin]

joe: the argument someone was trying to make is that NOBODY believed there were any WMDs when SO MANY PEOPLE INCLUDING WELL KNOWN DEMOCRATS said there WERE and had to be destroyed..... Now those same Demos are denying it all!!

[oldjoe5]

The argument is nonsensical.

There were no WMDs therefore to use their existence as a reason to invade a nation thousands of miles away is bogus and has cost trillions.

Don't be so naive. The admin did not give a crap about WMDs, one way or the other, except to be used as a tool to sell the war to the public

[CJurasin]

joe: Don't be so ignorant......everyone wants to blame Mr Bush for this war, while it was BOTH PARTIES who said there WERE WMDs there....or don't you remember??? Saddam simply put the last nails in his own coffin by NOT letting the U.N. inside to do the inspections he had AGREED to do YEARS BEFORE. Since there were no WMDs, then WHAT did Saddam have to lose?? Only a CRIMINAL would stop the authorities from doing the job they ALL agreed for them to do. Saddam was guilty by DEFAULT!!!

[oldjoe5]

There were no WMDs. Period. I don't care what you as to who said what. No WMDs. A war sold on the basis of a flase premise that has cost trillions is not justifiable by any sane standard.

Saddam did allow the inspectors in. Bush told them to get out. You should know this

[CJurasin]

Joe; Saddam INITIALLY let them in (after FIRST Gulf War), but then REFUSED to let them in this LAST time, thus causing the UN to force the issue. YOU should know that!! Saddam was also given the chance to GET OUT of Iraq before we came in and he also REFUSED to do that (PRIDE) thus putting the last nail in his own coffin and putting all the Iraqi people in great jeapordy, WHERE were you when that was going on? You also sound as though we should have ignored Saddam and just left him there??

[oldjoe5]

Actually, the inspectors wer back in Iraq when Bush ordered them out for Gulf War II. Do you really not know this? Don't you know who David Kay is and what he had to say?

"We" (i.e., the GOP admins) probably should not have increased US aid to Saddam in 1988 when he gassed the Kurds. Nor should we have sent him vast amounts of money and aid to kill Iranians (and others) throughout the 1980s.

But, just as surely, the USA should not have invaded and killed 1 million Iraqis in 2003

[denalaurens]

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.

We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

[denalaurens]

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs

continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

[oldjoe5]

Hey dena.

Guess what.

NO WMDs. No amount of quotes from various Dems, real or imagined, will change that fact. Face reality, you were lied to

[CJurasin]

Hey Joe: THINK!!! Saddam was given 2 weeks to LEAVE THE COUNTRY before we came in.....HE CHOSE NOT TO!!! Do you REALLY think there would have been a WAR if he had left??? Hello??

[oldjoe5]

The war was on no matter what Saddam did. That's pretty obvious

[CJurasin]

Joe: The ONLY thing that's obvious is that you've got your LIBERAL mind all made up, and NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE THAT (proof or no proof)!! "There are none so blind as he who will NOT see!!" If Saddam had pulled out (like the UN offer was made) there would have been NO ONE LEFT TO FIGHT! His "army" would have collapsed. (Kind of like Hitler with his SS. Hitler's Army hated him, but the SS backed him!! Saddam knew the choice, but because of PRIDE, REFUSED to leave...thus insuring the war!!

[oldjoe5]

The USA knew Saddam had nowhere to run and was not about to run.

Nonetheless, had he somehow taken off, the USA would have attacked anyway. This war was a go no matter what Saddam did. Don't be naive. Israeli loyalists put this in writing in the 90s

[CJurasin]

Joe: Then we were lied to by the DEMS as well...BUT WHY? What ELSE were we to go on? If you have information, and it's been established by BOTH parties (AND THE UN) and the TYRANT in question has PROVEN his intentions in the past (repeatedly) WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST? You can't let "cancer" sit there and fester, you HAVE to go in and remove it. If Hitler had been "removed" in the '30s we probably wouldn't have had war in Europe! "Those who do not learn from the past are CONDEMNED to REPEAT IT"

[oldjoe5]

What were Saddam's intentions that he had shown and constituted a threat to the USA? There was not one single act of Iraqi aggression against a neighbor since 1991's invasion of Kuwait (which was actually legit as Kuwait was stealing Iraqi oil -- but we did not hear that in the west).

In fact, the Zionist USA gave Saddam money and arms as long as he was killing Iranians. When that war ended, they decided he had to go. Saddam was removed for his lack of aggression, ironically

[CJurasin]

Joe: Intentions of threat to the USA?? You missing the point!! That's EXACLTY what our Liberals were saying about Hitler in the 30s. "Leave him alone, he isn't causing any problems HERE...he's no threat!!!" And most people bought that idiotic "philosophy" until he started taking over one country after another until he was so powerful, it was TOO LATE to avoid the inevitable! Saddam not only took over Kuwait (HE HAD NO RIGHT) you also FORGOT he THEN started shooting Scud Missels into Isreal!!

[oldjoe5]

If you want the USA to destroy a state that has WMDs, includinbg nuclear, has attacked, invaded, bombed, and occupied each and every one of its neighbors, has its hand in our pocket to the tune of billions per year, and has interfered in our foreing policy for deades, then we need to blow Israel off the face of the earth .

Saddam, on the other hand, had no WMDs and had attacked nobody in over 12 years,

[CJurasin]

Joe: Saddam's intentions were VERY clear.....don't be BLIND!! You KEEP FORGETTING the Hitler syndrome. Saddam HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT....... PERIOD!!! He was a festering CANCER just waiting for his "time" to come. (His PRIDE was his own downfall!) Isreal is a DIFFERENT discussion here and won't be thrown into this mix.....

[oldjoe5]

What were his intentions?

To attack USA with non-existent WMDs using non existent missile launchers or his non-existent submarine fleet.

Open your eyes. There was no legit security reason for the US to invade Iraq. This was an aggressive takeover by the Israeli loyalist neocons.

[CJurasin]

Joe: Intentions??? Gee, I wonder.... He PROVED himself over and over, and if it were'nt for the UN he would have continued his agenda!! First Kuwait, then Isreal, then any other country that he wanted to take. With the 3rd largest Army in the world (first war) he could pretty well do what he wanted over there. Again, with Hitler it was the SAME thing! First Poland, then the Czechs, Hungary, etc etc etc. Why are you so ignorant.....or is it just plain STUBBORNNESS to see the truth???

[oldjoe5]

Saddam's only aggression against neighbors were his attack and war with Iran -- backed and funded by Regan/Bush -- and his invasion of Kuwait -- due to Kuwait's theft of Iraqi oil. You say he proved himself over and over -- can you please list any other acgts og aggression.

Meanwhile, israel attacked/occupied/invaded Gaza, W Bank, Golan Heights, Lebanon, Syria, pushed for the US invasion of Iraq, and is now contemplating an attack on Iran.

[CJurasin]

Joe: Oh, so his "aggression" against his OWN people doesn't count for anything? The UN should ignore the Saddams, Idi Amins, Quadifii's, Castros, Hitlers and other dictator-monsters of the world? Saddam's shooting Scud Missels into Isreal doesn't count? And Kuwait's invasion was "OK" because they were drilling into an Iraqi oil field? Iraq wanted Kuwait's PORT! Iraq is mostly LAND LOCKED with no major ports on the Persian Gulf! Think MAYBE that was "kind of" important to him? WHERE WERE YOU?

[oldjoe5]

So, the USA invaded Iraq, resulting in the death (to date) of over 1 million Iraqis, to save the Iraqis from Saddam, who killed thousands of Iraqis 20 years earlier?

Do you even think about what you are saying.

You want an evil empire in the Middle East look no further than Israel. She has hundreds of illegally held, never declared and never inspected nukes, frequently attacks, invades, and occupies neighbors, has her hand in the pocket of the US taxpayer to the tune of $3 billion/yr

[CJurasin]

Joe: Do you DELIBERATLY miss the point or is your memory "selective" or something???? Reread my prior posts..... Saddam, Idi Amin, Castro, Quadaffi, Hitler? "Those who do not learn from the past, are CONDEMNED to repeat it". Remember any of that?? Am I talking to a wall or something?? We HAD to take him out! I can't draw you a picture any clearer than that. Saddam had an "agenda" and the UN HAD to stop him!! HELLO???

Joe, is anybody in there? Earth to Joe?

[oldjoe5]

Try reading your post. A bunch of names and adjectives that say nothing. This sort of emotional reponse with a complete lack of facts and reason can only mean one thing -- you have been propagandized. Don't you see this?

[CJurasin]

joe: Try understanding English!! I LIVED through those times and WATCHED them unfold.....back when you were STILL IN GRADE SCHOOL!!! You've been reading too much LIBERAL MEDIA AND tainted textbooks in school and have been lied to all along. Now you believe it all as FACTS!!

[CJurasin]

joe: Names that mean nothing?????? ARE YOU THE MOST STUPID PERSON ON THE PLANET???? Saddam, Idi Amin, Castro, Quadiffi, Hitler, and DOZENS MORE don't "mean anything" to you???? Are you STUBBORN or just STUPID??? History REPEATS ITSELF....the names change, the place changes, but situations happen over and over again!!! SADDAM WAS WELL ON HIS WAY TO BECOMING THE NEXT HITLER!!! (Remember Him????) Hitler's "antics" got BIGGER AND BIGGER and finally snowballed in to a WORLD WAR!!! HELLO???

[denalaurens]

LMAO...I have been wondering the same about Joe, the dumber.

[denalaurens]

Look, idiot, they had plenty of time to move and hide most of it and mustard gas IS a WMD. THAT is reality, so get your head out of the sand and admit it.

[oldjoe5]

Right.

They had so many WMDs they were a threat to the USA, the only superpower on the planet that sits 5,000 miles away. But they somehow not only destroyed all of the WMDs that they could have used against the US invaders, but also all records of it.

Now you're thinking

[denalaurens]

And kill themselves in the process? Sure, that's really smart. The WMDs wouldn't be able to kill all who stormed Iraq. DMDs laying around while forces go in and blow everything up, that's like smoking a cigarette next to a barrel full of gasoline.

[oldjoe5]

They had WMDs that would kill themselves but could not harm the invading troops?

Not very good WMDs -- not much of a threat to the USA either.

How is it they not only destroyed all WMDs but also all records of WMDs? Even the Bush admin admitted there were no WMDs -- they were wrong on this?

[denalaurens]

The invading troops didn't go in all at once. They all had reinforcements. I didn't say they destroyed the WMDs, just that they could've had them hauled off before the troops got there. They did have a deadline, after all. And where was it that Bush admitted that there were no WMDs? Documented evidence, please.

[oldjoe5]

"On Monday, President Bush admitted that the Iraq war is straining the psyche of our country. But he vowed to stay the course. A reporter questioned him about why he opposed withdrawing US troops from Iraq. In his answer, Bush admitted that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction"

You really don't know this?

My God, you really don't want to admit to yourself that you fell for gthe lies

[CJurasin]

joe: Have you forgotten the "shell game" the UN clamed Saddam was playing? They believed that Saddam was moving the chemicals from one place to another to avoid detection. What would have stopped Saddam from moving them up into Syria at the start of the war, or BURYING them in that SAND.....

They are still finding things in Egypt that have been buried for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. Sand leaves no tracks when covered properly and in the desert winds...

[denalaurens]

Please cite the name of the media where you got your info. Bush got his info on WMD from Congress, the CIA, Clinton and His advisors. For the sake of arguement, it doesn't matter. What matters is that the world was rid of a dangerous tyrant and a country was freed AND that more terrorists were wiped off the earth. The end result justified the means. And I don't buy that there were no WMDs.

[CJurasin]

Dena: Joe is young enough he doesn't remember what was going on back then. He knows nothing about the "shell game" the UN (and everyone else) claims Saddam was playing with any WMDs he might have had. That stuff, whether chemical, biological or nuclear are small enough (but powerful enough) to be hidden ANYWHERE in that desolate country and haven't been found YET. They could have also been taken up to Syria by just a small convoy and hidden up there for future use, OR SOLD. Ignorance is Bliss!!

[denalaurens]

Yeah, he has kind of built a wall around himself and he can't come out of it and save face at the same time. No matter how much evidence and logic we show him he is still going to come up with some lame excuse. He and his kind are desensitized. I told him sadaam had plenty of time to hide what he had and the man power, along with outside help, to do it. Syria I believe has them. They want to be part of just about every war in the mideast. I've read your posts with Joe and I know the frustration.

[oldjoe5]

NO WMDs. Period.  Bush admin accepts it, you should too.

[denalaurens]

lol, they didn't accept anything.

[oldjoe5]

Is there some way we can put a large wager on this?

[CJurasin]

Dena, look at his posts.....he can't think of anything new to say, so he keeps saying "No WMDs, No WMDs, No WMDs" His limited knowledge on the subject has painted him into a corner and he can't get out..  You can't convince a stuborn LIBERAL mule of anything. He's stuck in his own rut.

[denalaurens]

LMAO, I know, like a worn out record. lmao painted himself into a corner and can't get out...I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. Maybe he'll wait till the paint dries and we won't hear from him til then. CJ that was a good one lol

[oldjoe5]

dena: Try googling Bush admininstration accepts there are no WMDs and report back to me. Unless you are just another gutless liar

[CJurasin]

Dena: He's STILL at it!! Same old same old! Will somebody PLEASE take the needle off the record? It's STILL skipping and skipping and skipping and.......

[oldjoe5]

Judging from your reaction, I guess the truth really does hurt.

Give me more of your juvenile emotionally-laden words that say absolutely nothing: tyrant, Hitler, demonstrated attentions, threat to everyone, blah, blah, blah.

[CJurasin]

Joe; He DEMONSTRATED his intentions of WAR by INVADING KUWAIT and then STRIKING ISREAL with his SCUD MISSLES. Uhhh let me think....MAYBE he was trying to conquer that part of the world? HOW STUPID ARE YOU ANYWAY? WHY DO I HAVE TO CONTINUALLY DRAW YOU A PICTHRE?

And you KEEP TRYING to SHIFT this argument toward Isreal. As I told you before (but you KEEP FORGETTING) ISREAL IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT ARGUMENT! STICK TO THE POINT HERE.....IF YOU KNOW HOW! STOP BEING AN IGNORANT LIMP-WRISTED LIBERAL!

[oldjoe5]

I see. Hussein invaded Kuwait and was defetaed and disarmed by the USA in 1991. Therefore, the US had to attack again in 2003. That's logical.

Maybe the US ought to attack Great Britain for their attacking us in 1812?

Israel is the nation in the Middle East that has its hand in our pockets, actually has illegal nukes, that frequently attacks and murders thousands of its neighbors, that interferes with the USA political system. Anyone with any balls knows they are the one to defeat

[CJurasin]

Joe: Is your missing the point DELIBERATE or are you so STUPID that you can't understand??? You asked me for an example of Saddam's INTENTIONS and I gave you TWO OF THEM!!! You can't put 2 and 2 together??? You can't look down the road far enough to SEE where he was going WITH THOSE INTENTIONS???? DUH!!! "Those who do not learn from the past are CONDEMNED to repeat it" Why can't you understand that??? HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF!!!!!

[oldjoe5]

History: Israel invades and occupies lebanon for 20 years, Israel invades and occupies Gaza and the W Bank for 60 plus years; Israel bombs Syria; Israel pushes for an attack of Iran because someday Iran might have nukes (meanwhile, Israel has hundreds of illegal nukes); Israel slaughters over 1,000 in lebanon in 2006 and over 1,400 in Gaza in 2008-09; Israel starves gaza with an illegal and immoral blockade; Israel take $3 billion in US taxpayer $ each year.

Why aren't we attacking Israel?

[CJurasin]

Joe: Isreal was NOT the topic here.....you are trying to change the subject by evading the points!!

You REALLY wanna talk about Isreal now????

[oldjoe5]

Comprise a list of the things Saddam did that you think made him a worthy target of the US military and then compare it with Israel's list and it is no contest.

israel is the problem

[CJurasin]

Joe: Isreal is FIERCLY protective of itself.....especially considering it's size and past experience with the world and how it's been treated. (And RIGHTLY so!) Saddam was a power hungry TYRANT and wanted MORE of the world under HIS control....

[oldjoe5]

How Israel has been treated?

What about how Israel treats it neighbors to massive bombings and douses of white phosphorous?

Saddam was power hungry? He never expanded the boundaries of Iraq. Israel has more than triples its original land holdings...and is looking to expand the wars into Iran and Syria.

Time to pull the plug in the very sick and dangerous state of Israel

[CJurasin]

Joe: Saddam never expanded the boundaries of Iraq??? Then HOW did he get into Kuwait and WHY did he REFUSE to get OUT after we warned him MULTIPLE TIMES??? He SAW US gathering at the borders, he WATCHED our U.S. TV stations AND SAW what was happening, but yet he REFUSED TO LEAVE!!! NOBODY IS THAT STUPID.....just STUBBORN!!!

[oldjoe5]

Of course saddma never expanded the borders of Iraq. He did fight wars with both Iran and Kuwait, but never occupied those nations, never settled hundreds of thousands of Iraqia in those states.

Only israel has done such things since WWII.

[CJurasin]

Joe: He may not have "expanded" his borders, but he did OCCUPY the country with his Army....so what's the difference?? He didn't settle hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in the country because he didn't have TIME to do so with the UN already breathing down his neck....

[oldjoe5]

Do you even know what an occupation is?

If not, look no further than Israel's occupation of Lebanon, Gaza, W Bank, etc.

Why isn't the US invading Israel instead of Iraq?

[CJurasin]

Joe: Do you even know what an INVASION is?? A country has to INVADE before it can OCCUPY IT!!!

THAT'S what Saddam did to Kuwait!!

Isreal is a DIFFERENT TOPIC HERE....WHY DO YOU CONTINUALLY "TRY" TO INCLUDE IT????

[oldjoe5]

WTF?

Saddam did invade Kuwait, he did not occupy it.

Israel did invade AND occupy Lebanon, gaza, W Bank, Golan Heights and more.

We are talking about USA problems in the Middle East. And 99% of the problem is Israel.

[IronLion27]

Theres been other countries that have occupied neigboring states since WW2.

[IronLion27]

Chad into Sudan. The Congo into Ruanda. Iraq into Kuwait. China into both Tibet & Taiwan. Theres many.

[IronLion27]

Wow your fucking stupid.

[IronLion27]

Do you love assholes who run fucked up countries?

[oldjoe5]

@IronLion27 . Nope. I can't stand Netanayu.

[IronLion27]

You like name dropping I see. Netanayu is actually a sensible person, unlike his predacessor Olmert. Give me one reason There should not be a Jewish state.

[oldjoe5]

Netanyahu is sensible?

You must like his it's the 1930s and {fill in the blank on whoever the Israeli target is} is Hitler speech that he gives over and over

[IronLion27]

At least Natanayu sees that there is no point trying to win against Iran. And he is only worried about the protection of his state. And you still didn't answer my question.

[oldjoe5]

there should not be a Jewish State because there has been nothing but trouble on the Middle East for the USA since the creation of Israel. Israel has been an aggressive, imperialist, militarist nation from day one that has spents its history attacking, occupying, oppressing, and settling its neighbors. Israel has managed to take control of the US political system via the loyalty of elite "American" Jews, who have taken over virtually all of the mass media and used money and threats to

[oldjoe5]

Hey CJ, guess what.

There were no WMDs. You got lied to and bought it hook, line, and sinker. At least own up to yourself that you were fooled and try to move on with your life

[CJurasin]

joe: I don't have to "guess" anything, like YOU'RE doing! Your broken record has gotten old...you've got nothing more or new to say because of your limited knowledge on the subject. You IGNORE the fact that a TYRANT with the 3rd largest army in the world was a THREAT to everyone near him and potentially throughout the WORLD, and what his DEMONSTRATED INTENTIONS were! You IGNORE the comparisons to him and HITLER....you have the foresight of a 5 year old and are wallowing in your own ignorance!.

[oldjoe5]

What the hell are "demonstated intentions". How can you demonstrate an intention?

Let's focus instead on a nation that actually has hundreds of uninspected illegal nukes, a nation that has at one time or another in the past few decades attacked/invaded/bombed/occupi­ed/and threatened each and every one of its neighbors. A nation that has its hand deep into the pocket of the US taxpayer. A nation that extorts members of US congress.

Ladies and gents, I give you that light unto nations, Israel

[ruppertknickerbocker]

Whats this idea Dumbama's only had a couple of months read the Constitution this deficit is from the demorat congress he was a part of now the demorats want to double the deficit again. So Dumbama's been planning this bad economy for years.

[illslapyoutwotimes]

Cool video. I stumbled onto this unknown musician but I swear he is going places. Search "Vthov Obama Inauguration Song" This guy is very talented.

[Glsfutrs]

Blah blah blah blah...same BS different day.

[idonmatrix]

Well we could cut out many program if people stopped taking drugs, only had children they could afford to raise, pruchase homes within their means, stopped using credit cards they can't afford to pay. Stop buying goods made in China, South America, and Europe.

I'm voting for Obama b/c I believe that I have to be the change I want to see. I have to do something different if I want something different. In other words I'm going to do my part. It's called responsibility. Try it, you'll like it.

[EKSartist]

OBAMA: STRONG ON FOREIGN POLICY:

Obama chairs the Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Relations (responsible for U.S. relations with European countries, the European Union, and NATO). He has also traveled extensively as a member of the Foreign Relations Committee --- visiting Russia, Ukraine, and Azerbaijan in Asia; Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, and the Palestinian Territories in the Middle East; and Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Africa in Africa.

[lathegod]

You & the obamanics, aren't the only ones that will vote in Nov. All the bible thumpers, racist, & Obama haters will too, plus he shot himself in the foot again today. He has 0 chance of being elected! Kerry had swiftboaters telling lies that all the morons believed. What do you think about a racist, black, Muslim? Think with your brain, not your heart, he's done! I'm not saying he's a racist, Muslim, but Rev. Wright, is NOT going to go away!! The messiah declared it on national news!!

[anjck]

In my opinion Barack Obama would be a great president while he has many important experiences a great human sense. And the most important is that it doesn't matter whether he is african, american, asian, european, australian, what's important is that he will do something good for america and won't ruin everything like the all mighty bush.

[EKSartist]

Quotes from Bill Clinton:

"That's why I'm so committed to make sure every American gets health care."

The universal health care Hillary FAILED to deliver!

"That's why I'll fight to make sure women in this country receive respect and dignity."

But not for White House interns!

[TigerXeN]

It isnt right to have an african running an american country.

[smartinhere]

I hope you die right now at this sec!!!

[smartinhere]

Comment @tigerxen

[EKSartist]

OBAMA's EXPERIENCE:

-graduated from Columbia University in 1983

-law degree from Harvard in 1991

-first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review

-returned to Chicago to practice as a civil

rights lawyer and teach constitutional law

-his advocacy work led him to run for the Illinois State Senate, where he served for eight years

-In 2004, he became the third African American since Reconstruction to be elected to the U.S. Senate

[Gypsee4258]

bentleius You are so very right !!! This man has so much wisdom ans knowledge.

I am proud to say that we in the State of Georgia ,by a landslide went with Obama.

Obama08

[bentleius]

watching this series of clips from the town hall meeting in Pa., I see this: this man is very knowledgeable, with a comprehensive, broad understanding of the issues, both policy-wise and practical.

So enough of that damn nonsense about how he supposedly "lacks substance"!

[bentleius]

watching this series of clips from the town hall meeting in Pa., I see this: this man is very knowledgeable, with a comprehensive, broad understanding of the issues, both policy-wise and practical.

So enough of that damn nonsense about how supposedly "lacks substance"!

[lulustive]

Hope is both the earliest and the most indispensable virtue inherent in the state of being alive. If life is to be sustained hope must remain, even where confidence is wounded, trust impaired. Hope is more powerful than fear and Love is greater then hate! That is why Obama will bring back a government of the people, by the people, and FOR the people. He will bring honesty and integrity back to the Whitehouse.

[24kpure]

I donated to the Obama campaign, not to the people who made bad home purchase/financing decisions. I pay my own mortgage and plan to donate a little to Obama's campaign to reach the white house every time I get paid. Thank you very much.

[panadevulpe]

there are ppl who bought a house to live in it and those who bought it to make a profit . that turned out to be a donkey punch , so fuck em . also , ppl who got houses 3 times bigger than they could pay for just to show off . fuck em too . when you buy a house , do your homework

[BIBIchgo]

How about donating all this money he gets to run for president to people's foreclosed homes.

[blackmasterpeice]

Yes in fact they have Hillary Clinton takes lobbyists money has from day one still does there are actually clips on youtube of her defending taking corporate special interests money. McSame is gonna be the third term for Bush so yes he definitely will let the corporations write all the legislation if he has his way.

[mtedora]

after all these years of

experience-minus-vision that have only resulted in mass paranoia, and the collective "fisting" of America, can we open up to giving this man and his genuine vision (and the Cabinet he'd put together to help him) a chance?

[ghostoftheyellowdog]

Yea, the African-American male known as Barack Hussein Obama is getting an easy ride in America because of who he is. Don't be so simple! Dig a little deeper. Most of Clinton's supporters disapprove of Obama, but most of Obama's supporters approve of Hillary (a first for either campaign). Could that be the result of negative ads and a 24% (of all Hillary supporters in MS) republican boost? Hey, I bet your republican cacmxliiii! We all know how you GOP's love to buy those domain names.

[beteck123]

When baracks talk of reclaiming the America dream,i can guaranteed he wasnt refering to the kind of dream u r having. Obamas supporters approving Hillary?U r not in this world.I will tell u what makes ppl support Obama.TRUST,SINCERITY,INTERGRI­TY. Now can u even make a claim Hillary has any of those?I mean even being a Hilaary supporter that you are.

[24kpure]

Do you know what percentage of black votes Bill Clinton won when he ran for president? Last time I checked, he was 100% white. Your comments don't hold water. At this point, I would call anyone who still supports Hillary Clinton a sheep since she is hiding her tax returns, list of earmarks, documents from her so-called experience in the white house, she defends taking money from PACs and special interests, uses dirty and divisive tactics in her presidential campaign. Need I go on?

[kelthalean]

$4k per year for college tuition. I like that. I paid $8k this year for tuition and board. But if i can get an additional $4k per year for community work, it's a great policy. And everyone can agree with me, that if you do community work, it looks good on your resume. In addition, pell grants paid for my first 2 years of college, but after that, I paid out of my pocket and get some money from my parents to help pay. I think this $4k credit for college will help out a lot of people.

[lqwid]

I think the plans he has are truly workable...but where is the money comming from? Remember...nothing is free

[owlies]

thank you for this video. obama is a policy wonk!! love it! but one thing i would ask: why doesn't he propose tax breaks for caregivers?