@ZORGtheALIEN the sun was north of the building. the north face was not and never was in shade. if you look at simons retarded dotted line you will see how bad his work is. it's not even close to being parallel to the building. you are a moron if you believe his tripe.
@uheardmebitch if you need proof of the sun claim, because you are not familiar with the events of 911, then watch the second strike. the south face is in shade. then watch the naudet first strike. the shadow of the plane is on the building and the whole face is in sun. do your homework and stop wasting peoples precious time.
Addendum to my previous comment: The holes at WTC1/2 do not accomodate wing tips or vertical stabilizers. The radar returns show flight envelopes way in excess of wide-bodied planes. Total TV Fakery was disinformation, designed to divide and conquer a group of intelligent people that were waking up to a devastating truth: There Were No Planes on 9/11. IMHO, we need to hold on to this basic truth.
No scientific principles can account for aluminum airframes entirely piercing multiple HSLA steel columns and spandrel plates, plus reinforced concrete and steel floors. The Fairbanks/Hezarkhani contradiction is indisputable: the engine impact pojnts and corresponding puffballs don't align in Fairbanks. There is no legitimate physical evidence for planes, i.e. confirmed parts. NPF: No Planes: Fact!
christ it's just getting sad now. 21 seconds to bring down simons september bullshit. is that the record now? i wanna see if someone can do it in 15.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
'the word truth has a meaning. i hope social service realises that soon.' I don't think Simon will ever change, making things up to fit in with his idea of what happened on 9/11 is what he does best. I would love to know what agenda he is working under, because truth is not one of them. September Clues is full of bull from start to finish! I just wish I could have seen through it sooner. Instead of wasting my time promoting it, a lesson I have learned the hard way.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
So who's left that believe only the aeroplanes were fake, that these images were inserted into 'live' and 'replay' footage, with voice-over actors and all? You, Jeff, youzurk...me and a couple of others...? There's an opposition that believe in real planes and another that believe all 911 footage is fake. Belief in fake planes alone, has turned down a lonely stretch of road.
Thanks for all your clear thinking on the subject, it's been refreshing.
i think i went thru a similar thing at one point two years ago. but it's all too much, the speed, the no physics. WHY DIDN'T THE TAIL SNAP OFF?. i encourage your skepticism. because i know where it leads :)
SEPTEMBER CLUES! Undebunkable... not even a nice try.
Davidsenzacoloranti 1 week ago
hmmm you didnt show anything here.........????? what exactly were you trying too prove???
Realism911 1 year ago
you say he's 100% incorrect yet you offer no logical arguement to explain why...
ZORGtheALIEN 1 year ago 5
@ZORGtheALIEN the sun was north of the building. the north face was not and never was in shade. if you look at simons retarded dotted line you will see how bad his work is. it's not even close to being parallel to the building. you are a moron if you believe his tripe.
uheardmebitch 1 year ago
@uheardmebitch if you need proof of the sun claim, because you are not familiar with the events of 911, then watch the second strike. the south face is in shade. then watch the naudet first strike. the shadow of the plane is on the building and the whole face is in sun. do your homework and stop wasting peoples precious time.
uheardmebitch 1 year ago
No plane hit WTC but the masses are still hypnotize by the fake images
sodasoap 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Eh? No-planer nonsense should just be ignored. Find something better to work on, like Obama.
bofors7715 3 years ago
Addendum to my previous comment: The holes at WTC1/2 do not accomodate wing tips or vertical stabilizers. The radar returns show flight envelopes way in excess of wide-bodied planes. Total TV Fakery was disinformation, designed to divide and conquer a group of intelligent people that were waking up to a devastating truth: There Were No Planes on 9/11. IMHO, we need to hold on to this basic truth.
saturnaspider 3 years ago 5
No scientific principles can account for aluminum airframes entirely piercing multiple HSLA steel columns and spandrel plates, plus reinforced concrete and steel floors. The Fairbanks/Hezarkhani contradiction is indisputable: the engine impact pojnts and corresponding puffballs don't align in Fairbanks. There is no legitimate physical evidence for planes, i.e. confirmed parts. NPF: No Planes: Fact!
saturnaspider 3 years ago 3
christ it's just getting sad now. 21 seconds to bring down simons september bullshit. is that the record now? i wanna see if someone can do it in 15.
monkeygoatchicken 3 years ago
i'll see what i can do ;)
uheardmebitch 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
'the word truth has a meaning. i hope social service realises that soon.' I don't think Simon will ever change, making things up to fit in with his idea of what happened on 9/11 is what he does best. I would love to know what agenda he is working under, because truth is not one of them. September Clues is full of bull from start to finish! I just wish I could have seen through it sooner. Instead of wasting my time promoting it, a lesson I have learned the hard way.
youroom101 3 years ago
He's still making deceptive rubbish. His new wtc7 study is simply garbage. He's got a legion of sucked in cronies.
MandoMohan 3 years ago
I KNOW HE'S TAKEN TO PLAYING VIDEO BACKWARDS TO MAKE IT LOOK WEIRD. he's turning into a complete dick.
GTV911 3 years ago
and why draw that line so high ?. does he not understand perspective?
uheardmebitch 3 years ago
Unfortunately, I'm starting to believe he does understand!!!
MandoMohan 3 years ago
look at the top one, it's not even parallel to the other building.
genghis6l99 3 years ago
...by which I mean...I think he understands perspective, alright, but chooses to deceive. He does it on purpose!
MandoMohan 3 years ago
i hope not. his eyesight might be bad???. it's getting harder to make excuses for him
genghis6l99 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So who's left that believe only the aeroplanes were fake, that these images were inserted into 'live' and 'replay' footage, with voice-over actors and all? You, Jeff, youzurk...me and a couple of others...? There's an opposition that believe in real planes and another that believe all 911 footage is fake. Belief in fake planes alone, has turned down a lonely stretch of road.
Thanks for all your clear thinking on the subject, it's been refreshing.
MandoMohan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
at the moment I believe only in audio fakery,
I'm sure noplaner on pentagon and shanksville.
the only strange thing is the easy penetration of the buildings
thanks G
youzurk 3 years ago
Comment removed
MandoMohan 3 years ago
I'm not very sure, but I think there are more clues... that the planes were real rather than unreal
I've open eyes anyway...
youzurk 3 years ago
i think i went thru a similar thing at one point two years ago. but it's all too much, the speed, the no physics. WHY DIDN'T THE TAIL SNAP OFF?. i encourage your skepticism. because i know where it leads :)
uheardmebitch 3 years ago