INTERNATIONAL NOTICE OF JURISDICTIONAL CLAIM REGISTERED

[JonDeth]

These notices you are sold into are a complete scam and I can very simply explain why. It merely proves the mail was signed for and received, it does not mean the notice was reviewed and acceptance does not create adhesion in law.

So in other words, they will merely pocket vito it which is to say, yes it was received but not read and I am under no obligation to read it.

Send it via process server, the CORRECT way and guaranteed they respond to your "claim of right".

[JonDeth]

The nonsense logic behind this is also to claim if I send you a notarized claim of forfeiture of all your property by receiving this notice and a default judgment in 14 days if you fail to respond, I could mail out hundreds of these at random now couldn't I and in many cases they would be assumed to be a scam, tossed in the garbage then 14 days later, I show up with the sheriffs to claim my shit.

Not happening!

Registered mail has no power in law, just evidence of delivery.

Menard scammed you.

[ytBG]

@JonDeth With all due respect, does your line of reasoning, which seems plausible, go both ways? If a government entity sends a registered notice to a man and he does not react to it, can he then successfully claim in court he treated it as junk mail? Doesn't the fact that the piece of mail is registered stand as a notice itself?

[JonDeth]

@ytBG of course and they do it all the time. They do not even bother to serve the notice correctly, that is how corrupt they are. My niece received a jury duty notice in the mail ORDERING her to report to the courthouse by a certain date.

Ordering?

That is to claim we are obligated and taking orders as though we are in the military. Meanwhile, they could not even prove they served the notice since it came by standard mail. Nor could they claim she opened it. Know enough and that's your defense.

[JonDeth]

@ytBG to digress further, it specifically said this is a notice informing you that you are to report for duty.

Basically they set a trap and you step into it believing you are obligated. Our notices on the other hand have to be more clever. it's far better to challenge their authoritative duty once you have voided all contracts and revoked consent to be governed or represented.

Look up Dean Clifford's videos on UKblive, he uses the dispute of authority I came up with some months ago.

[ytBG]

@JonDeth Will do. Thanks!