Что-то странно, этот майор-летчик говорит, что "оценив ситуацию они поняли, что полосы хватит для торможения". Тогда вопрос, почему самолет долбанул за привод и догорал уже далеко на газоне? Почему крен влево? Это скорее уж не крен, а занос влево, шасси-то в порядке было. Ну так и попытались бы удержать самолет на полосе! Насколько я вижу, самолет преспокойно выкатился за полосу, налетел на "настоящий русский пень" и в результате вспыхнуло топливо в баках. ШИКАРНО! Газончик-то кто ровнять будет?
Не в самолёте дело, а в чайках на взлётке! Где орнитологи? Кто их сейчас вообще готовит? Где их учат? Кто туда идёт? Страна "эффективным менеджеров", итить!!! ((( Профессионалов душат и уничтожают. Одни Сочи на уме.
Блин, у меня закончилось поле для ввода текста :/ Еще следует учесть, что Боинг-757 построен на 20 лет позже Ту-134 и имеет более совершенную аэродинамику и авионику. Самолеты же первых поколений падали с завидной регулярностью. Так что не тяговооруженностью единой...
@zlx87 "Ты когда-нибудь видел стоящие раядом 747-й и "свисток"?" - Не только видел, но и летал в обоих пассажиром. Тока тут в ролике (watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE) не 747-й, а 757-й - тоже двухмоторный как и 134-й. И если верить педовикии, то тяговооруженность у 757 и 134 практически одинаковая: 6800*2/47 и 17900*2/123. Так-то! :))
Технические характеристики ты привел верно. Но опять-таки скоростной напор пропорционален квадрату скорости. Так что еще одна секунда разгона на 2 двигателях - и Ту -134 уже мог бы взлететь. Для того собственно и расследуют каждый инцидент с прерванным взлетом отдельно, изучая записи параметрического самописца. Без дураков Боинг-757 хороший самолет, но он просто мог взлетать с более длинной полосы и к моменту столкновения набрать бОльшую скорость.
@hitlerkaput1981 Okay.... so attack someone for saying how amazing it was that everyone was okay! And that is not preaching you fool! Only someone out to start a trouble would post something that ignorant! So how about you "go somewhere else"! To each their own, doesn't mean they are wrong, it's called freedom of speech a'hole GET OVER YOURSELF!
another dumb religious fuck started yapping... Got to church or something, ask your god that those accidents don't even happen in a first place, idiot.
@hitlerkaput1981 What is wrong with you, seriously? You assumed wrong, I do not believe in any religion! How the hell did you get that out of my reply?
However I do believe in sticking up for people when dealing with an a'hole! Like I said to each their own, it doesn't mean that either is wrong. Really what you did, is called discrimination, in the USA!
But please, keep on with this and show youtube who you really are!
It's sad to see another youtube'r who can't act like an adult.... =/
"oh shutup douchebag, go suck on your satanic dildo you fag!" said true believer and follower of God. Or maybe it was act of God that you said it? I am still sitting here without lightning strike smiting me. Go do a rain dance around a church or something, so the thunderstorm will come over.
Ну а если кто сомневается, как можно выжить при таком страшном крушении, поищите прямо тут по ключу 'Airbus A320 Plane Crash '. Это крушение рейса F-GFKC. При всей брутальности видео погибло там всего 3 человека из 136. И слава Богу.
triduza загорелось именно топливо самолета, а оно находиться в крыльях, именно горящие (оторваные ) крылья и видно на видео (вы же не видели пожар сверху), вот потому и успели выбежать все из самолета.
какие там могли быть пассажиры, если при крушении самолёт загорается и уже после тога как идёт съёмка с близкого расстояния, виден разбитый в дребезги самолёт ассобено там где находятся пассажиры!!
Вы абсолютно правы . Пассажиров самолёта офицеров штаба ЧФ и целого адмирала заранее клонировали и выпустили из кустов после того как самолёт разбился .
что-то слабо мне верится, что это летчики этого самолета. на видео видно, что топливо воспламенилось моментально, весь самолет был объят огнем, как его можно было покинуть?
объяты пламенем отваливающиеся и разлетающие в стороны крылья, в них баки. а фюзеляж с экипажем и пассажирами по инерции проехал ещё некоторое расстояние. просто из-за дыма не видно
слава богу все живы,а я грузился конкретно по этому поводу,но всё это конкретная нереальность,что всё так закончилось,молодчики все!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! =)))
klikon2008 Bird strike on number 1 engine (you can see it take fire just before the plane attempted to rotate). Then the pilot aborted takeoff but the runway was too short
I'm happy to hear that everyone survived. They can get another plane. Perhaps, where it is possible, the runways should be longer...and have maybe a sand-pit at the very end of the runway...to hopefully avoid the fiery crash seen in this video.
just saying what operating procedure normally is. I never said anything about feeling good about trying it, or that they'd ever get anywhere, (as they was clearly the case) just that they did what is standard ops in that situation.
standard procedure for ALL aircraft is that once the accelerate-stop distance has been reached, no matter what happens, IF the aircraft CAN fly, then it MUST be flown because there is not room to stop the aircraft on the remaining runway, as we saw here. so some are right in that respect, however, it appears that the aircraft being too underpowered on one engine, was NOT able to fly.
If you listen to what the pilot said, directly after the plane hit the birds, the plane started to pull left and started to lose height (rather strange comment since they hadnt lifted off but anyway)... so yer basically they didnt believe they were going to be able to lift off.
You might be right, but as stated somewhere below, I wish you would experience a single engine failure on Tu-134 after V1 is reached in simulated flight, plane full of fuel for its maximum flight endurance, 30° celsius and 28,55 in/hg of QNH. You´ll never get she airborne on those conditions.
D-30 series II engine will create appr. 7 metric tons of T/O thrust while the MTOW could be some around 49 metric tons. Now you will see that the attempt to lift off with one engine is a bloody one, in case you would have additional 1500 meters of TODA, we can thumble if it would happen.
I think you"ll find the Tu-134 is slightly under-powered and unlike modern Boeing/Airbus twins, would struggle to remain Airborne on one Engine. Take into account a little Rudder Delection to counter Non-Asymetric Thrust which would increase Drag slightly and already your asking an Under-Powered Aircraft to perform outside its Limits.He really had no choice,he had to get it down immediately,and the Proof is in the Pudding, everyone survived.
Each plane is different, ruissian planes i would imagine especially tri jets and this old would have radically different characteristics to anything you might have ever come across... theres different training within the boeing family of aircraft for example with different procedures so saying you know about procedures for a tu-134 is ignorant imo.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hope the pilot was sacked and imprisoned, he fucked up big time, he was already rotating which mean he was above the speed at which he is commited to taking off, yet he decided to abort the take off when hes got no runway!!!
OMG, is a miracle. What I see in this video is a plane full of jet fuel, run off the rwy and burst into a big fireball, and all people survived? THANK GOD! :D
Yer russian... everyone survived thankfully. They hit birds on takeoff and lost all power in the left engine. Started to break and obviously ran out of runway... everyone got out before it was completely destroyed.
Ну по сравнению с Ярославлем экипаж действительно герои и всё правильно сделали.
aleks070777 6 months ago
Что-то странно, этот майор-летчик говорит, что "оценив ситуацию они поняли, что полосы хватит для торможения". Тогда вопрос, почему самолет долбанул за привод и догорал уже далеко на газоне? Почему крен влево? Это скорее уж не крен, а занос влево, шасси-то в порядке было. Ну так и попытались бы удержать самолет на полосе! Насколько я вижу, самолет преспокойно выкатился за полосу, налетел на "настоящий русский пень" и в результате вспыхнуло топливо в баках. ШИКАРНО! Газончик-то кто ровнять будет?
condor0102 6 months ago
Fucking Birds!
TheDylanJoyce 7 months ago
Не в самолёте дело, а в чайках на взлётке! Где орнитологи? Кто их сейчас вообще готовит? Где их учат? Кто туда идёт? Страна "эффективным менеджеров", итить!!! ((( Профессионалов душат и уничтожают. Одни Сочи на уме.
hyppopotamm 8 months ago
Yea thats right blame in on the birds
jontibloom 8 months ago
The firefighters had no protective suits or headgear!
bgibb101 10 months ago
miracle surviver's
lspontes 10 months ago
Блин, у меня закончилось поле для ввода текста :/ Еще следует учесть, что Боинг-757 построен на 20 лет позже Ту-134 и имеет более совершенную аэродинамику и авионику. Самолеты же первых поколений падали с завидной регулярностью. Так что не тяговооруженностью единой...
lynxxxxie 11 months ago
@awaken77 I speak russian and I say shakataka shakataka
turbox405 1 year ago
ちんこかゆいよ><
55bagus 1 year ago
Вот ебучие чайки!)
hit47rus 1 year ago
живые котики, это главное!!!
honda19871977 1 year ago
watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE - А чего тут у пацанов как-то получше получилось?
Ssykun 1 year ago
Ты когда-нибудь видел стоящие раядом 747-й и "свисток"?
Эдак ты в следующий раз спросишь, чой-то у экипажа т-90 получилось проехать сквозь деревянный сруб, а феррарька расплющилась.
zlx87 1 year ago
@zlx87 "Эдак ты в следующий раз спросишь..." - Обязательно! Вот специально для тебя и спрошу! :))
Ssykun 1 year ago
@zlx87 "Ты когда-нибудь видел стоящие раядом 747-й и "свисток"?" - Не только видел, но и летал в обоих пассажиром. Тока тут в ролике (watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE) не 747-й, а 757-й - тоже двухмоторный как и 134-й. И если верить педовикии, то тяговооруженность у 757 и 134 практически одинаковая: 6800*2/47 и 17900*2/123. Так-то! :))
Ssykun 1 year ago
@Ssykun
Имеет значение, до какой скорости самолет успел разогнаться. В этом ролике, как видно, летчики пробовали вытянуть самолет вверх.
lynxxxxie 11 months ago
@Ssykun
Технические характеристики ты привел верно. Но опять-таки скоростной напор пропорционален квадрату скорости. Так что еще одна секунда разгона на 2 двигателях - и Ту -134 уже мог бы взлететь. Для того собственно и расследуют каждый инцидент с прерванным взлетом отдельно, изучая записи параметрического самописца. Без дураков Боинг-757 хороший самолет, но он просто мог взлетать с более длинной полосы и к моменту столкновения набрать бОльшую скорость.
lynxxxxie 11 months ago
Ну самое главное - все живы :)
Vlad2010ful 1 year ago
угробили самолет .... герои
vinnitca1990 1 year ago
@vinnitca1990 ДА ГЕРОЙ НЕ ОНИ УГРОБИЛИ А ЧАЙКИ ТУПЫЕ ВОТ КАК!
DENIS140395 1 year ago
@DENIS140395 I speak russian and I say shakataka shakataka
turbox405 1 year ago
@vinnitca1990
Ту-134 все-таки очень устаревший самолет. Он обычно падает при отказе двигателя при взлете.
lynxxxxie 1 year ago
What flight number was this?
AAlover12121212 1 year ago
In soviet russia, the plane strike bird
BoeingBeatsAirbus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoeingBeatsAirbus
"In soviet russia, the plane strike bird"
could you think of anything more stupid to say?
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoeingBeatsAirbus
"In soviet russia, the plane strike bird"
did you think of anything more stupid to say?
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoeingBeatsAirbus
"In sоviet russiа, the plаnе strikе bird"
did you think of anything more stupid to say?
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
that was crazy, good pilots
featheredmusic 1 year ago
Amazing everybody alive. Great pilots.
doberman921 1 year ago
How many people could survived at this accident?
konibu3 1 year ago
@konibu3 everyone is alive in this accident
tishfull 1 year ago
@tishfull
Amazing!!
Thank you.
konibu3 1 year ago
it was an act of god everyone got out alive. wow.
Afterburner8004 1 year ago
@Afterburner8004
shove your god up your ..., u know where. It was luck and knowledge what to do in extreme situations, not religion. Go preach somewhere else
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
@hitlerkaput1981 Okay.... so attack someone for saying how amazing it was that everyone was okay! And that is not preaching you fool! Only someone out to start a trouble would post something that ignorant! So how about you "go somewhere else"! To each their own, doesn't mean they are wrong, it's called freedom of speech a'hole GET OVER YOURSELF!
lifethroughthedark 1 year ago
@lifethroughthedark
another dumb religious fuck started yapping... Got to church or something, ask your god that those accidents don't even happen in a first place, idiot.
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
@hitlerkaput1981 What is wrong with you, seriously? You assumed wrong, I do not believe in any religion! How the hell did you get that out of my reply?
However I do believe in sticking up for people when dealing with an a'hole! Like I said to each their own, it doesn't mean that either is wrong. Really what you did, is called discrimination, in the USA!
But please, keep on with this and show youtube who you really are!
It's sad to see another youtube'r who can't act like an adult.... =/
lifethroughthedark 1 year ago
@hitlerkaput1981 oh shutup douchebag, go suck on your satanic dildo you fag!
Afterburner8004 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Afterburner8004
"oh shutup douchebag, go suck on your satanic dildo you fag!" said true believer and follower of God. Or maybe it was act of God that you said it? I am still sitting here without lightning strike smiting me. Go do a rain dance around a church or something, so the thunderstorm will come over.
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
@hitlerkaput1981 your a asshole.
BoeingBeatsAirbus 1 year ago
@BoeingBeatsAirbus
shut the fuck up, child
hitlerkaput1981 1 year ago
all the passengers alive !!
lordcarnabon 1 year ago
irbus A320 Plane Crash
lynxxxxie 1 year ago
Ну а если кто сомневается, как можно выжить при таком страшном крушении, поищите прямо тут по ключу 'Airbus A320 Plane Crash '. Это крушение рейса F-GFKC. При всей брутальности видео погибло там всего 3 человека из 136. И слава Богу.
lynxxxxie 1 year ago
кайф!!!
MrBombella 1 year ago
triduza загорелось именно топливо самолета, а оно находиться в крыльях, именно горящие (оторваные ) крылья и видно на видео (вы же не видели пожар сверху), вот потому и успели выбежать все из самолета.
natalex02 2 years ago
english subtitles please
vilchico 2 years ago
as43 и triduza у меня есть оригинал этого видео с хорошим качеством от очевидцев крушения и на ней четко видно как от самолета бежали люди..
LeshikSYSADMIN 2 years ago
В аэропорту Гвардейский под Симферополем при взлете загорелся Ту-134
При взлете загорелся один из двигателей самолета
На борту самолета находился главком ВМФ РФ Владимир Масорин.
Экипаж - профи, все пассажиры живы.
ROMANOFFDIMA 2 years ago 3
11SPEAK SPANISH PLEACE
putapci 2 years ago
какие там могли быть пассажиры, если при крушении самолёт загорается и уже после тога как идёт съёмка с близкого расстояния, виден разбитый в дребезги самолёт ассобено там где находятся пассажиры!!
antimozg1 2 years ago
Вы абсолютно правы . Пассажиров самолёта офицеров штаба ЧФ и целого адмирала заранее клонировали и выпустили из кустов после того как самолёт разбился .
as43 2 years ago
ну да конешно пилоты все придумали. на хорошем качестве и вправду видно как пасажиры выходили из самолёта.
MyMotorist 2 years ago
что-то слабо мне верится, что это летчики этого самолета. на видео видно, что топливо воспламенилось моментально, весь самолет был объят огнем, как его можно было покинуть?
triduza 2 years ago
Вы абсолютно правы , это иноплатеня .
as43 2 years ago
объяты пламенем отваливающиеся и разлетающие в стороны крылья, в них баки. а фюзеляж с экипажем и пассажирами по инерции проехал ещё некоторое расстояние. просто из-за дыма не видно
A4759 2 years ago
Thanks
hooman79 2 years ago
слава богу все живы,а я грузился конкретно по этому поводу,но всё это конкретная нереальность,что всё так закончилось,молодчики все!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! =)))
ALTEZZAKAR 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian quality
tom123ek 2 years ago
Pls notice birds r the same in Russia or USA. Not so long ago they have destroyed A320, happy it is landed to Hudson river safely.
lynxxxxie 2 years ago 2
thanks a lot))) everything is now more than clear)
klikon2008 2 years ago
Me alegra muchisimo que hayan sobrevivido. Vivan la Vida con alegria y agradecimiento!!!
siopsa 3 years ago
klikon2008 Bird strike on number 1 engine (you can see it take fire just before the plane attempted to rotate). Then the pilot aborted takeoff but the runway was too short
Ramus39 3 years ago
thanks))) it is really amazing that no one got hurt)
klikon2008 2 years ago 9
I'm happy to hear that everyone survived. They can get another plane. Perhaps, where it is possible, the runways should be longer...and have maybe a sand-pit at the very end of the runway...to hopefully avoid the fiery crash seen in this video.
redletterchurch 3 years ago
You stupid ideot, its 4 km long...
ConfuseTheCat 2 years ago
Confused Cat: You misspelled idiot. I was speaking of runways at airports everywhere...not this one in particular.
redletterchurch 2 years ago
just saying what operating procedure normally is. I never said anything about feeling good about trying it, or that they'd ever get anywhere, (as they was clearly the case) just that they did what is standard ops in that situation.
donlightbody 3 years ago
standard procedure for ALL aircraft is that once the accelerate-stop distance has been reached, no matter what happens, IF the aircraft CAN fly, then it MUST be flown because there is not room to stop the aircraft on the remaining runway, as we saw here. so some are right in that respect, however, it appears that the aircraft being too underpowered on one engine, was NOT able to fly.
donlightbody 4 years ago 2
If you listen to what the pilot said, directly after the plane hit the birds, the plane started to pull left and started to lose height (rather strange comment since they hadnt lifted off but anyway)... so yer basically they didnt believe they were going to be able to lift off.
OriginalAtomicSheep 3 years ago
it did take off
beechnd 3 years ago
You might be right, but as stated somewhere below, I wish you would experience a single engine failure on Tu-134 after V1 is reached in simulated flight, plane full of fuel for its maximum flight endurance, 30° celsius and 28,55 in/hg of QNH. You´ll never get she airborne on those conditions.
pzl104wilga35 3 years ago
D-30 series II engine will create appr. 7 metric tons of T/O thrust while the MTOW could be some around 49 metric tons. Now you will see that the attempt to lift off with one engine is a bloody one, in case you would have additional 1500 meters of TODA, we can thumble if it would happen.
pzl104wilga35 3 years ago
tom123ek,
Shut up bitch! Russia and Russian quality - 4 rever.
Сука!
StorRMok 4 years ago
Difícil é entender os que os manos falam...
fredfvm 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Russian quality
tom123ek 4 years ago
1) i work in the aviation industry, so i know a lot of the procedures.
2) i have qualification in principles of flight so i know how aircraft and engines work, and again i know the precedures
3) im a training private pilot, and guess what again i know the procedures
anyone else wanna question my knowledge? how about you? what the fuck do you know about aircraft and procedures????
homer090 4 years ago
shut up you tart, nobody cares
SantaHul 4 years ago
I think you"ll find the Tu-134 is slightly under-powered and unlike modern Boeing/Airbus twins, would struggle to remain Airborne on one Engine. Take into account a little Rudder Delection to counter Non-Asymetric Thrust which would increase Drag slightly and already your asking an Under-Powered Aircraft to perform outside its Limits.He really had no choice,he had to get it down immediately,and the Proof is in the Pudding, everyone survived.
MADTASS 4 years ago
Each plane is different, ruissian planes i would imagine especially tri jets and this old would have radically different characteristics to anything you might have ever come across... theres different training within the boeing family of aircraft for example with different procedures so saying you know about procedures for a tu-134 is ignorant imo.
OriginalAtomicSheep 3 years ago
He says they had seen several seagulls and they passed by the cabin. After awhile the engine lost power and the plane started to heel left
Vewyt 4 years ago
homer090 - you are too quick to make judgments. What do you know about the crash, what you saw in video? What do you know about the Tu-134?
Tu-134 cannot climb on one engine, plus pilot said plane started to roll, which is expected. Desicion to abort was correct.
ladzio 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hope the pilot was sacked and imprisoned, he fucked up big time, he was already rotating which mean he was above the speed at which he is commited to taking off, yet he decided to abort the take off when hes got no runway!!!
homer090 4 years ago
Shut up you fat british fag, you dont know anything about Tu-134 and that everyone made out!
ComradeLynx 4 years ago 2
It's good to see someone after one of these. Usually you don't get a chance.
rwsmith29456 5 years ago
OMG, is a miracle. What I see in this video is a plane full of jet fuel, run off the rwy and burst into a big fireball, and all people survived? THANK GOD! :D
racsito39 5 years ago
Yer russian... everyone survived thankfully. They hit birds on takeoff and lost all power in the left engine. Started to break and obviously ran out of runway... everyone got out before it was completely destroyed.
OriginalAtomicSheep 5 years ago
all survived
bizoncheg 5 years ago
Tragic. I can't but hope there were more survivors then those two guys... That's russian correct?
xenosoldier 5 years ago