BMW have it right. Other car manufacturers are giving their cars hydrogen fuel cells to power electric motors, whereas these guys are simply blowing it up in an ICE to make more power than gasoline :D
Hydrogen is much better than toxic Batterys ! Why not use the (15000 w/h) from a house roof for driving - it´s better than destroying the rain forest.
Is it possible, for the fuel to be liquid H2O and the seperation process to be taken within the car and not outside the car? Resulting in Oxygen gas being released in the atmosphere(which is good) and cheaper fuels(just use water)
@nasdin94 No it is not possible as it would violate a fundamental energy conservation law which states that the transfer of energy is never 100% efficient for any system. Converting water to hydrogen, regardless of the process (electrolysis, fractional distilation, etc) requires more energy than the amount of energy produced by hydrogen to run the car, so in other words the car might produce hydrogen but it wount move, it will be a sitting factory.
@mboromboroone You are over thinking it. Gasoline is not 100% efficient, So neither does Hydrogen have to be. It just has to be reliable. And when you think it over, it is a better candidate for a combustion engine. It burns completely with some incredible push and doesn't leave residue behind like gasoline does because the gasoline didn't burn completely. It's being done. This is not after effects making the Hydrogen 7 run.
The debate isnt what you are rebutting. The point is there is no car that can take in only water not H2 and run because the energy needed to split hydrogen from water is always more than the energy received by oxidizing hydrogen (to form water). I am not arguing about how H2 compares to gasoline.
@mboromboroone But the thing is that we are not using all the available energy from the sun. There are very interesting studies that shows that creating hydrogen from solar devices has a very acceptable rate of effeciency. This is mostly thanks to nano solar tecnology. In my humble opinion hydrogen might be the solution to substitute toxic technologies such as fossil energy sources.
I think in the future everyday cars will use electric and sports cars will use hydrogen...because hydrogen is very expensive to produce but is better for sport cars
The BMW hydrogen 7 seems like a better solution than fuel cell vehicles. The primary reason, the internal combustible engine. Will the BMW Hydrogen 7 use a metal hydride for storage of the hydrogen?
It looks as if the animation is showing the process of electrolysis. It takes water and separates the water molecule into H2 and O2 by passing direct current through it. That is how they will produce the hydrogen fuel. When the combustion process takes place, the H2 will combine with the O2 in the air and produce H20 as exhaust.
This is favoring the automotive and oil companies. The reason why they are doing research on hydrogen cars instead of electric cars is because it takes 3x more energy to power a hydrogen car the same distance of an electric car. And the cheapest way to get hydrogen, is through fossil fuels. Remember all the electric cars they destroyed?
I can't agree with you less. Fossil fuel is not the only source of producing electricity for the electrolysis of H2O. The matter of fact is if there is a constant demand of hydrogen, nuclear is a cheaper energy source for a stable demand. And don't forget about solar power and wind power, there is no storage of them in a effective way yet, storage of electrical energy in chemical form could be a solution.
Moreover, I am not to positive about electric cars, consider the batteries of laptops, they have a short lifespan under constant recharging and discharging, and the disposal of them creates more pollution.
Moreover, I am not to positive about electric cars, consider the batteries of laptops, they have a short lifespan under constant recharging and discharging, and the disposal of them creates more pollution.
Well, if we could pull through with capacitor based batteries, as well as utilizing 3-phase power. They would have a DRAMATIC increase inin both lifespan and would create significantly less pollution to dispose and utilize.
BMW have it right. Other car manufacturers are giving their cars hydrogen fuel cells to power electric motors, whereas these guys are simply blowing it up in an ICE to make more power than gasoline :D
PetrolDemon 4 days ago
holy crap! even with Hydrogen this thing can go 160mph!
wombothecheeseit 1 month ago
the future is closer than you think.
bimosalexandres 2 months ago
If you pee in the tank, would it work? Just curious.
6tortured6soul6 3 months ago
@6tortured6soul6 does your pee contain H2? I think not -_-
PetrolDemon 4 days ago
Hydrogen is much better than toxic Batterys ! Why not use the (15000 w/h) from a house roof for driving - it´s better than destroying the rain forest.
xparade0de 7 months ago
That's not a petrol hose thats a freaking gun
KingAaron789 8 months ago
HA! he did not pay that hydrogen! sneaky
ukuleleles 9 months ago
So, the fuel is Hydrogen gas..or H2 for short
Is it possible, for the fuel to be liquid H2O and the seperation process to be taken within the car and not outside the car? Resulting in Oxygen gas being released in the atmosphere(which is good) and cheaper fuels(just use water)
nasdin94 9 months ago
@nasdin94 No it is not possible as it would violate a fundamental energy conservation law which states that the transfer of energy is never 100% efficient for any system. Converting water to hydrogen, regardless of the process (electrolysis, fractional distilation, etc) requires more energy than the amount of energy produced by hydrogen to run the car, so in other words the car might produce hydrogen but it wount move, it will be a sitting factory.
mboromboroone 9 months ago
@mboromboroone You are over thinking it. Gasoline is not 100% efficient, So neither does Hydrogen have to be. It just has to be reliable. And when you think it over, it is a better candidate for a combustion engine. It burns completely with some incredible push and doesn't leave residue behind like gasoline does because the gasoline didn't burn completely. It's being done. This is not after effects making the Hydrogen 7 run.
gilmanindustries 7 months ago
The debate isnt what you are rebutting. The point is there is no car that can take in only water not H2 and run because the energy needed to split hydrogen from water is always more than the energy received by oxidizing hydrogen (to form water). I am not arguing about how H2 compares to gasoline.
mboromboroone 7 months ago
@mboromboroone But the thing is that we are not using all the available energy from the sun. There are very interesting studies that shows that creating hydrogen from solar devices has a very acceptable rate of effeciency. This is mostly thanks to nano solar tecnology. In my humble opinion hydrogen might be the solution to substitute toxic technologies such as fossil energy sources.
YoyimaruX 4 months ago
HEY!!! He didn't pay for the hydrogen!! :D
XLosSantosX 10 months ago
I think in the future everyday cars will use electric and sports cars will use hydrogen...because hydrogen is very expensive to produce but is better for sport cars
allah211 10 months ago
dio can ,ma che crucchi di merda!
hammaran45 11 months ago
Why aren't we all driving similar cars! I want one!!!!!!!!!!
kryp10yt 1 year ago
Cool, no more petroleum use.... No more wars for it !!!!
scoooby143 1 year ago 4
best thing is you can make Hydrogen fuel from your tap water... Hydrogen is the most abundant molecule in the universe.
ThirdRomeAquilo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is NOTHING new... Check out Jack Nicholson talking about Hydrogen cars in The 70s...............
laurajdahl 1 year ago
Hydrogen pump made me LOL...Its like RAPE@!!
ljesusking2133 1 year ago
The BMW hydrogen 7 seems like a better solution than fuel cell vehicles. The primary reason, the internal combustible engine. Will the BMW Hydrogen 7 use a metal hydride for storage of the hydrogen?
davepamn 1 year ago
hydrogen FTW i am really gonna buy one H-car as soon as its spread around the globe.
Oh and one thing, fuck arab oilsheikhs, you are going doooown
autoromu 1 year ago
hydrogen FTW im gonna buy one car like this as soon the revolution is around the globe
autoromu 1 year ago
this is a future.
datobeable 1 year ago
If this car exists and works, is the only thing keeping it from going into production is the lack of hydrogen stations?
TornTech 1 year ago
Hydrogen is the future. Lets just start making hydrogen cars.
sambamu 1 year ago 2
wow i really wish the gas company would fuck off.
CropDuster33 1 year ago
I WHANT THAT !!! drive without worrys about pollution and consumtion !!
boilingpoint2 1 year ago
I like how its not quiet and still has a nice sporty sound to it
000eMan000 2 years ago 18
@000eMan000 didn't every bmw got those propperties?
queenzortje 1 year ago
@000eMan000 Yeah, as a pedestrian I'd hate it if cars in the future were all silent and sneaked up behind me when I'm crossing the street.
Maracachucho 2 months ago
bad thing hydrogen explodes with contact with air, you are inside of a bomb but id take the risk
diego750il 2 years ago
no?
PhoenixTheMaster 1 year ago
@diego750il petrol is explosive with oxygen no big change there really in fact petrol is more explosive than hydrogen
joey0o7 1 year ago
this car pollutes less then a prius, and runs much better
3312cdfp5674 2 years ago 4
it doesn't pollute at all...it's exhaust is water.
SamuraiDarkness 2 years ago 2
some parts are still made from plastic, not organic. so it still pollutes some in the long run.
3312cdfp5674 2 years ago
I fell in love with this car
DethTorque 2 years ago 11
Yeah this is a very good car, this car make a noise and not pollution, good ideo no?
bmdu69 1 year ago
How do they safely store the hydrogen?
Kochenderfer21 2 years ago
it is compressed
slizza786 2 years ago
My dream car !
ouaip04 2 years ago 3
mammamia che bolide !!!
F60massa 2 years ago
how much does this car go for 150,000 dollars or what?
68hinduhammers 2 years ago
its a BMW soooo ya, not that thats too far off a brand new beamer runnin of gasoline
Mitterditter 2 years ago
It's not for public sale yet, and probably won't be for quite a while.
reevsaj 2 years ago
Yeah and that's because of the dirty petrol business in the world
DethTorque 2 years ago
0.200kg 1.60 euro
sabanikas 2 years ago
fake gov/corp ss technology.
mikhasya1976 3 years ago
how muche doest it cost 1 L /Kg of Hydrogen?????.....
marian2826 3 years ago
so you are saying that this car produces oxygen?
As far as this illustration is showing.
care to comment?
readyshift69 3 years ago
It looks as if the animation is showing the process of electrolysis. It takes water and separates the water molecule into H2 and O2 by passing direct current through it. That is how they will produce the hydrogen fuel. When the combustion process takes place, the H2 will combine with the O2 in the air and produce H20 as exhaust.
Bladem31 3 years ago
swaeet
readyshift69 3 years ago
I personally favor hydrogen combustion than fuel cell.
reasons : i dunno.
And who ever said the cheapest way to get hydrogen is from fossil fuels..
can you state the link of the site where you found this statement or refer me to the book ..?
X3QT0R 4 years ago
Kinda sounds like diesel on Hydrogen mode?
stickleback401 4 years ago
This is favoring the automotive and oil companies. The reason why they are doing research on hydrogen cars instead of electric cars is because it takes 3x more energy to power a hydrogen car the same distance of an electric car. And the cheapest way to get hydrogen, is through fossil fuels. Remember all the electric cars they destroyed?
HAL11000 4 years ago
I can't agree with you less. Fossil fuel is not the only source of producing electricity for the electrolysis of H2O. The matter of fact is if there is a constant demand of hydrogen, nuclear is a cheaper energy source for a stable demand. And don't forget about solar power and wind power, there is no storage of them in a effective way yet, storage of electrical energy in chemical form could be a solution.
you7head 4 years ago
Moreover, I am not to positive about electric cars, consider the batteries of laptops, they have a short lifespan under constant recharging and discharging, and the disposal of them creates more pollution.
you7head 4 years ago
Moreover, I am not to positive about electric cars, consider the batteries of laptops, they have a short lifespan under constant recharging and discharging, and the disposal of them creates more pollution.
you7head 4 years ago
wow a real good argument back and forth i dunno what i agree with or what is logical
mountshasta2002 3 years ago
Well, if we could pull through with capacitor based batteries, as well as utilizing 3-phase power. They would have a DRAMATIC increase inin both lifespan and would create significantly less pollution to dispose and utilize.
stephenswickedcool 3 years ago
It makes such an interesting start-up noise!
revaholic 4 years ago