site:youtube.com ehehehehe YOU SHOULD SEE THE LOOK ON ANGEL ROSE's FACE says John Joseph O'Brien :-) < YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU SEE ANGELS John Joseph O'Brien YOU IDIOT says GOD THE FATHER :-)
I'd be happy to respond to your message - if you had one. But the fact is that you are the one who attacks the messenger; just look at all of your comments - there is no information, just vitriol. It seems that you are the one who lacks objectivity. At this point in human history, climate change contrarians are either ignorant, malicious, or they have ulterior motives.
Hahaha. Mother Earth can't handle pollution, but it can handle billions of years of volcanic eruptions? What about the fact that the earth has withstood catastrophic meteoric strikes? I think the earth can handle a bit of pollution.
People need to realize that Mr Gore's film is not factual. Sure, it looks good, and has the support of the icons of popular culture, but it doesn't disclose all the facts. A lot of which were disclosed in this video. There are many scientists who are criticized for speaking out against Gore. People say "oh the oil companies are paying them". That is not true in most cases. Please face the fact that the world has always done this. It will always do this.
Do some research. You site "swindle" as example of the climate change hoax, but research on the people that made the video. All of them are paid by the energy and auto industry. Some of them used to work for the tobacco industry. The cold hard truth is that we, the indutrialized west have made a problem that will wipe out civilization as we know it. It can be stopped, but it will take drastic, immediate action by us, the indstrialized west. Live simple or die complicated.
the fact that we have no affect on the woprld is like saying a man living on a cloud spends all his time looking down on a single species on a tiny blue dot out of all the universe
the earth is constantly changing temperature over long periods of time. look at ice ages and il ninio's. its nieve to think that the earth remains at 1 temperaature...........ITS A LIVING THING!!! we are still coming to the end of an ice age.....hence the ice at the poles. al gore is a politician, not a environmental activist........never EVER trust politicians!!! its their job to lie
Growing human population and growing energy use will significantly effect the environment. It may not be catastrophic in our great-grand children's'time. But, in time it will happen. I do agree that poverty stricken countries can benefit from energy. As world energy consumption increases so will ours. That is the problem. Why don't skeptics talk about the points they agree with? Isn't their goal the same as the rest of us? And as for their source of funding... it is important.
In the 60s it was "Limits to Growth" published by the Club of Rome that contained computer models that showed that by 2000 we'd be running out of natural resources, have rampant overpopulation, and widespread pollution. In the 70s it was global cooling and the coming of a new ice age. Hysterical demagogues are nothing new.
Gore just regurgitated the science. He didn't make any of that up; just sensationalized it with a little hollwood airbrushing. Know who you're talking to before you resort to mindless insults as well.
Marlo Lewis says that Antarctica was gaining ice mass. True, but he doesn't tell you that the sea level is still rising at about 2 millimetres per year, largely due to melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets as a result of global warming. The additional snow mass in Antarctica he talks about is triggered by climate change as increased evaporation from the oceans puts more moisture into the air. Unfortunately, that amount is not large enough to offset the great meltdown.
I'm glad Lewis has a voice, but I hate it when the media claims to be giving "balanced" reports as they pit one on one, when it should be one on 17,000.
Lewis reiterates Julian Simon. Paradigms for social progress, culture, personal happiness need to be rethought in a world of diminishing resources and too many humans. Who says accumulated wealth leads to ultimate happiness? In the end, there will always be those who by hook or crook, grasp for ever more, defending things over the lives of their neighbors. We need compassion guiding our conscience in all things, even to forgiving the economists for pretending to be scientists.
Lewis reiterates Julian Simon. Paradigms for social progress, culture, personal happiness need to be rethought in a world of diminishing resources and too many humans. Who says accumulated wealth leads to ultimate happiness? In the end, there will always be those who by hook or crook, grasp for ever more, defending things over the lives of their neighbors. We need compassion guiding our conscience in all things, even to forgiving the economists for pretending to be scientists.
yeah Marlo. what a fag. this guy has no proof and we've never heard of him. missinformation, just like the media. doesn't take science to see the changes globally you idiot.
Thanks Marlo for your commentary. We really appreciate your unscientific opinion. It's nice to know that we can rely on a political scientist and economist to inform us about climate science. I guess it's too bad that CEI is no longer receiving money from ExxonMobile. I guess ExxonMobile realized that they no longer find the need to hire a group to misinform and politicize climate science.
Funny thing. I live in Canada, It's now Jan. 7. I have experienced single, even double digit celsius above freezing temps now for two weeks.
I'm 52. I've never seen this before. I know 52 years is not an "Epoch" but come on. Put the semantics back in your holster and be honest with yourself if no one else.
so, you're saying if I have never experienced this in 52 years, then in the 30 remaining of the 82 that you speak of, that would have made all the difference? So you're saying all the weather globally is "OK"?
Gore needs to respond to your comments by attacking your source of money (oil and he knows that it is a very small part of it) because he is unable to answer your question with the truth for if he did his whole Global Warming idea would collapse.
17,000 scientists signed the petition for the OREGON INSTITUE OF SCIENCE & MEDICINE... compared to the 900+ who signed Gores...yet Gore claims the scientific community is UNANIMOUS. 1,600,000,000 people in the world have never had electricity and we care about the earth warming up 1 degree in a century!!! Wake up!!!
This has been flagged as spam show
site:youtube.com ehehehehe YOU SHOULD SEE THE LOOK ON ANGEL ROSE's FACE says John Joseph O'Brien :-) < YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU SEE ANGELS John Joseph O'Brien YOU IDIOT says GOD THE FATHER :-)
TKTRV 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
youtube Beetlejuice Movie - Day-Oh!!
/\
IGOOGLE> GOT YOU AGAIN JOHN says THE ANGEL SURETY ROSE :-)
/\
GOOGLE > ehehehehe HEY John Joseph O'Brien says SUPER GHOST OF ELVIS :-)
GOOGLE > THE HOLY MOTHER HAS A NEW MESSAGE FOR YOU John Joseph O'Brien says THE ANGEL SURETY ROSE :-)
TKTRV 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOOGLE> John Joseph O'Brien IS ANGEL THEATER :-)
TKTRV 1 year ago
DO YOU BELIEVE IN ANGELS OPRAH says THE ANGEL LOOKAGAIN
^
GOOGLE > YOU ARE BUSTED OPRAH says THE ANGEL SURETY ROSE :-)
OPRAH AND OBAMA ARE BUSTED WITH BILL CLINTON AL GORE AND GEORGE BUSH FOR FAKE NAME INTERNET and YOUTUBE SATANISM :-)
spuddy83 has posted a comment to your profile = Whats with the John Joseph O'brien, none of your stuff makes any sense
^
Google > WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE OPRAH says John Joseph O'Brien :-)
TKTRV 1 year ago
who's this douche?
ManBearPigIsCereal 4 years ago
I'd be happy to respond to your message - if you had one. But the fact is that you are the one who attacks the messenger; just look at all of your comments - there is no information, just vitriol. It seems that you are the one who lacks objectivity. At this point in human history, climate change contrarians are either ignorant, malicious, or they have ulterior motives.
luditemike 4 years ago
Hahaha. Mother Earth can't handle pollution, but it can handle billions of years of volcanic eruptions? What about the fact that the earth has withstood catastrophic meteoric strikes? I think the earth can handle a bit of pollution.
RealBloppy 4 years ago
People need to realize that Mr Gore's film is not factual. Sure, it looks good, and has the support of the icons of popular culture, but it doesn't disclose all the facts. A lot of which were disclosed in this video. There are many scientists who are criticized for speaking out against Gore. People say "oh the oil companies are paying them". That is not true in most cases. Please face the fact that the world has always done this. It will always do this.
ellislighthouse 4 years ago
The Competative Enterprise institute is funded by ExxonMobil and the American Petrolium Institute
toffergrage 4 years ago
Do some research. You site "swindle" as example of the climate change hoax, but research on the people that made the video. All of them are paid by the energy and auto industry. Some of them used to work for the tobacco industry. The cold hard truth is that we, the indutrialized west have made a problem that will wipe out civilization as we know it. It can be stopped, but it will take drastic, immediate action by us, the indstrialized west. Live simple or die complicated.
luditemike 4 years ago
the fact that we have no affect on the woprld is like saying a man living on a cloud spends all his time looking down on a single species on a tiny blue dot out of all the universe
oreolvrs 4 years ago
the earth is constantly changing temperature over long periods of time. look at ice ages and il ninio's. its nieve to think that the earth remains at 1 temperaature...........ITS A LIVING THING!!! we are still coming to the end of an ice age.....hence the ice at the poles. al gore is a politician, not a environmental activist........never EVER trust politicians!!! its their job to lie
jamienixonesq 4 years ago
Put your heads in the sand americans! /John in Sweden
johnbengtsson 4 years ago
Growing human population and growing energy use will significantly effect the environment. It may not be catastrophic in our great-grand children's'time. But, in time it will happen. I do agree that poverty stricken countries can benefit from energy. As world energy consumption increases so will ours. That is the problem. Why don't skeptics talk about the points they agree with? Isn't their goal the same as the rest of us? And as for their source of funding... it is important.
serenity0075 5 years ago
In the 60s it was "Limits to Growth" published by the Club of Rome that contained computer models that showed that by 2000 we'd be running out of natural resources, have rampant overpopulation, and widespread pollution. In the 70s it was global cooling and the coming of a new ice age. Hysterical demagogues are nothing new.
bobcrunch 5 years ago
very true. Seems like there is a new doomsday scenario arising every 10-20 years.
extremeweatherguy 4 years ago
Gore just regurgitated the science. He didn't make any of that up; just sensationalized it with a little hollwood airbrushing. Know who you're talking to before you resort to mindless insults as well.
jffryfnt 5 years ago
Marlo Lewis says that Antarctica was gaining ice mass. True, but he doesn't tell you that the sea level is still rising at about 2 millimetres per year, largely due to melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets as a result of global warming. The additional snow mass in Antarctica he talks about is triggered by climate change as increased evaporation from the oceans puts more moisture into the air. Unfortunately, that amount is not large enough to offset the great meltdown.
palachi 5 years ago
I'm glad Lewis has a voice, but I hate it when the media claims to be giving "balanced" reports as they pit one on one, when it should be one on 17,000.
poinsonfartdog 5 years ago
Lewis reiterates Julian Simon. Paradigms for social progress, culture, personal happiness need to be rethought in a world of diminishing resources and too many humans. Who says accumulated wealth leads to ultimate happiness? In the end, there will always be those who by hook or crook, grasp for ever more, defending things over the lives of their neighbors. We need compassion guiding our conscience in all things, even to forgiving the economists for pretending to be scientists.
poinsonfartdog 5 years ago
Lewis reiterates Julian Simon. Paradigms for social progress, culture, personal happiness need to be rethought in a world of diminishing resources and too many humans. Who says accumulated wealth leads to ultimate happiness? In the end, there will always be those who by hook or crook, grasp for ever more, defending things over the lives of their neighbors. We need compassion guiding our conscience in all things, even to forgiving the economists for pretending to be scientists.
poinsonfartdog 5 years ago
yeah Marlo. what a fag. this guy has no proof and we've never heard of him. missinformation, just like the media. doesn't take science to see the changes globally you idiot.
jwgt4e 5 years ago
ybe if you'd look at the global history with science you'd understand that drastic climate change is reoccuring throughout the ages
maudib2142 5 years ago
Thanks Marlo for your commentary. We really appreciate your unscientific opinion. It's nice to know that we can rely on a political scientist and economist to inform us about climate science. I guess it's too bad that CEI is no longer receiving money from ExxonMobile. I guess ExxonMobile realized that they no longer find the need to hire a group to misinform and politicize climate science.
jffryfnt 5 years ago
Funny thing. I live in Canada, It's now Jan. 7. I have experienced single, even double digit celsius above freezing temps now for two weeks.
I'm 52. I've never seen this before. I know 52 years is not an "Epoch" but come on. Put the semantics back in your holster and be honest with yourself if no one else.
theonlyrealMugsy 5 years ago
Well bud, if you were 82 you would have experienced several winters much warmer than this one. Don't be an idiot!
mjth37 5 years ago
so, you're saying if I have never experienced this in 52 years, then in the 30 remaining of the 82 that you speak of, that would have made all the difference? So you're saying all the weather globally is "OK"?
theonlyrealMugsy 5 years ago
Gore needs to respond to your comments by attacking your source of money (oil and he knows that it is a very small part of it) because he is unable to answer your question with the truth for if he did his whole Global Warming idea would collapse.
RocketManF4 5 years ago
Al%2
wallza 5 years ago
You`re full of shit..
Where is YOUR backup?
There is not any basic for the crap you`re selling!
Anybody can give criticism...
cryscendo 5 years ago
i agree
tnnsaction 5 years ago
17,000 scientists signed the petition for the OREGON INSTITUE OF SCIENCE & MEDICINE... compared to the 900+ who signed Gores...yet Gore claims the scientific community is UNANIMOUS. 1,600,000,000 people in the world have never had electricity and we care about the earth warming up 1 degree in a century!!! Wake up!!!
macroscope 5 years ago