@Zbyszkoz you do realize, that the F117 is from the 80s, right? and that that's just when the govt. says it was finished? And that it wasn't shot down because it wasn't stealth, it was because some lucky serb sprayed a bunch of AA guns and rockets in there when he heard it and got a hit on it. It was merely a test for later stealth aircraft anyways. You have to realize, the USAF has never shown all it's cards. We had the SR71 developing in the late 50s!
@Zbyszkoz How can you honestly think the Russians are technologically more advanced than us?! They haven't even finished their 5th generation fighter jets, and we have had them since the 90s.
@BlindBusDrivr They haven't even finished their 5th generation fighter jets, and ...hahahahahah because don't need. !!!.what you mean 5th generation , Russia can shot down any USA-stealth plane whit ZERO problems. stealth technology?, who has in production ? Russia has ballistic missile 6th generation ?. . did USA finish EMP conventional weapon, NOT, but British ( very small radius).
@BlindBusDrivr Russia shut down plans from Laser canon 35 year before USA !!. Did USA has 6th generation A/A missile 200 km or space ship?.who has the best air defense system?,Corvettes ,attack helicopters end 100 more.
@Zbyszkoz It's hilarious how this kid actually thinks that Russia is superior to the USAF. We have all that Russia has and much more, we just keep it quiet, not bragging about it on the internet. We've had secret technology from the Germans since WW2. And Russia didn't shoot down planes with lasers over 35 years ago dumbs. And what good are those missiles if they cannot lock on?! And space ships? We landed on the moon, you never could. And we have the best air defense dumb ass.
@BlindBusDrivr We've had secret technology from the Germans since WW2. ....hahahahahaha Germany has technology from Poland end Russia, go to YT 1/3- Secret Russian Aircraft of WWII
@Zbyszkoz What the fuck are you talking about? Germany had stealth bombers in WW2. Look up the horten Ho IX. Poland has nothing to do with it either. The Germans had discovered anti gravity technology by WW2, they never got to put it to use because it was all lost from allied bombings. If you want to know about REAL secret tech, look up Bob Lazar.
@BlindBusDrivr USAF has never shown all it's cards .....lake Russia. SR-71 is one multi billions design disaster you know way ? original was design for caring one atomic bomb.
@Zbyszkoz What on earth are you talking about?! It's not a billion, it's 33 million per model. And where did you get atomic bomb carrying from? It's called the SR71, SR= Stealth Reconaissance.
@BlindBusDrivr hhahahah lake first person on the Moon was Twardowski from Poland. Stealth technology is a myth. Stealth technology is only parts from 5th generation planes F- 22 or F-35 is not 5th generation planes. is lake SU-35 or Mig35. USA produce only 2-3 planes F-22 whit original design end original materials. . ONLY 3 MAXIMUM.
@Zbyszkoz He's a character from Polish folklore. And really, stealth is fake? Then why is it winning it's mock battles and simulations because the other aircraft can't lock on? Why does it have virtually no radar signature? Your a complete brainwashed dumb ass. The Su35 and Mig35 are SHIT to an F22, in testing it was recorded that 92% of the time, the F22 will beat them in AA. And your last part is utter bullshit too, there have been hundreds of them made.
@BlindBusDrivr Then why is it winning it's mock battles...because on simulation is original project F-22 whit not Russian technology for Russian Air Forces but only for export . Niedwiediev ask US specialist when US well be used true the best weapon on simulators . about SR-71 project cost 30milions ?. ask SR-71 pilots about original project destination. ONE ATOMIC weapon. US engineering's make big mistake, atomic bomb was to heavy so install on SR-71 spay instrument.
@Zbyszkoz Yeah, the problem was the cost, that was the only problem. Everything else is from an exaggerated news report based off of 'anonymous sources' which means, it is COMPLETE BULLSHIT.
@BlindBusDrivr 2004 Indian and American Air Forces held their first joint combat exercise, where the score between F-16 and Mig-29 was close to 9 to 1 in favour of Migs. At that time even the US media wrote about the USAF in front of the senate committee asking for money for the Raptor (latest US fighter). They called it a political suicide to tell the American public that the government is putting their pilots in an aircraft where they are probably going to die at a rate of 9 to 1
@Zbyszkoz HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAThat is BULLSHIT dude you make me laugh. the F16? to a MiG29?! the F16 is undefeated!! Fuckin MiG going 9:1 against the F16? MY ASS. man you gave me a good f'in laugh there.
@BlindBusDrivr HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAThat is BULLSHIT dude you make me laugh. the F16? to a MiG29?! the F16 is undefeated....go to Gwalior, February 14-26, 2004 Indian
@BlindBusDrivr Poland has nothing to do with it either....... hahahha You have not idea how meany new design is from Poland from 1930-1939 to Germany end British planes.
@Zbyszkoz Okay, big whoop, Poland had a couple nice airplane designs before war, like that means shit since all of Germany's masterpieces were designed DURING the war.
@BlindBusDrivr The F-15 lost another battle with Russia’s Su-27 in the autumn of 2000, during the US-Japanese drills in the Pacific Ocean. Two Su-27 jets, covering the Su-24MP, conducted a sudden attack of the flagship of the US 7th fleet, Kitty Hawk. The US aircraft carrier would have been destroyed in real combat conditions.
@Zbyszkoz HAHAHAHAHAHAHA that was almost as funny as the first. The F15 is also undefeated, but by an even greater margin. And a US carrier would not fall to a couple of russian jet. Gosh do you just reach in your ass and pull this shit out? You have so many of these faked incidents made by the Chinese/Russian govt.'s to promote their AF.
@BlindBusDrivr F15 is also undefeated,....hahahahahahahahaha because USA NEVER fight against Russian Domestic Planes NEVER HAPPEN , after Vietnam. USA never fight against country whit military satellite system end AWACS support, NEVER. USA fight only whit old Russian exports weapon . US end NATO is scary Russian Domestic weapon
it's just a matter of time before the F-18 is replaced with another air superiority fighter more like the F-14 as will be seen as necessary by the U.S. Navy.
@BlindBusDrivr Eurofighter loose simulations against the F22 because it couldn't lock? dumb ass..... end dump ass, Eurofighter flaying, F-22 not ZERO COMBAT. Russia in 2012 start production 6th generation air to air missile up to 200km .good bay Stealth planes
@BlindBusDrivr Reuters quoted the official as saying, in the end the CIA intercepted military communications in China, found that the F-22 aircraft was shot down by Chinese fighters intercepted and crashed in the mountains islands off the coast of Zhejiang
@Zbyszkoz Why would we have to intercept their communications? We know every move every F22 takes, they are highly valued, and only a couple dozen made. And btw dumb ass story is fake, no F22 has flown any sortie or mission over China. If China shot down an F22, it would be national news, but it's never happened, nor will it.
@BlindBusDrivr U.S. "Christian Economic Journal" on February 3 published an article written by the U.S. defense experts Kai Mike's article, alluding to China's threat to U.S. aircraft in the Western Pacific region of the air and condemned the U.S. government to conceal three downed F-22 is the fact that taxpayers can not tell more than 300 million dollars have been buried in Zhongnanhai.
@Zbyszkoz This is the biggest load of bullshit I have ever heard. No F22 has ever been shot down, no less by some dumb ass Chinese jet, which is just a copy based off old US tech. It was just a hoax made up for Chinese propaganda, if they could beat our jets, they wouldn't be spending billions to catch up.
European intelligence source claims Iran stuns West by 'aiming a laser burst quite accurately' at US satellite in never before reported incident. US official: If Russians provided Iran with sophisticated jamming equipment it means a lot else is at risk too
An F-35 can be shot down with a six willed truck a bridge and an experienced badass. The MiG is always vulnerable to the eternal bane of Soviet Aircraft: American archers with flaming arrows and red headbands.
Was surfing google a bit and i just saw that Mig35 is 30milion dolar wich makes him like waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of F35... for price of f35 u can buy 6 mig 35 .... an army of 100f35 vs 600mig35 guess who would win -.-
Well this stealh tech that f35 has seems preaty awersome . f35 cant posibly match mig in any way sept this stealth thing (for witch i think russians dont give a demn instaling in mig) and well price of mig wont exeed 100mil while f is nearly 200mil -.-
Funny because the MIG-25 is still the fastest jet fighter on earth and don't give me the SR-71 bullshit because its not a jet fighter... honestly the F-35 is a piece of garbage when compared to the F-22 or MIG-31... even the MIG-25 is better than it and that's being phased out.
wow...how our western governments don't see how diabolical this plane is going to be I do not know, but for one thing the MiG-35 can outmaneuver the F-35 like a bitch. Someone please tell who's smart idea it was to convince the US that their Navy needs a single engined fighter instead of a two engined fighter? What happens when they have engine failure? Oh wait...they can't just shut an engine down...they have to ditch. I'm all for western technology, but fuck the F-35 and our wasted billions.
If I had to choose I'd pick the one based on a proven design not one that is over budget and trying to fill every niche the military can think of. So my choice is the Mig. The F 35 is a joke, a bottomless pit for the US military to through money at. As far as the DoD not being impressed, you think they would actually risk backlash to say the Mig is a good plane. Hell no everyone of them will say the US plane is better. Nobody ever said how the Mig 29 did against US planes in mock combat either.
@thumper1519 The F15 is 11-0 against MiG 29s. That's in real combat. If the F35 is a joke, why are the Russian companies trying to make superior jets to counter it? A MiG 35 against an F35, now that just wouldn't even by fair the MiG.
Let's see first the mig35 isn't an older mig29 anymore than the F15 is the same as a F35 so using that combat record is for totally different planes. Second, the mig29's that have been shot down by the F15 ( which is still a damn good plane) weren't exactly flown by experienced or willing to really fight kind of pilots.
Third, all countries that have a large military budget constantly try to build the next best thing when it comes to planes. If nobody tried to one up anyone else we'd still be flying sopwith camels or spads.
@thumper1519 well obviously. And my point was that the F15 had defeated many MiGs before, and regardless of the plane itself, the F15 pilots in the USAF work on AA and nothing else. And the F22, would destroy the Su35. According to simulations the Rafale vs Su35 has a ratio of 1:1, the Eurofighter would win 82% of the time, and the F22 would beat it 92% of the time.
Agreed, that was my point, pilot skill can and has made up for a seemingly inferior plane in ACTUAL combat. The problem with simulations is just that a simulation with rules and limits on the risks pilots are aloowed to take. A good case of old inferior plane making it hard on a modern jet is the F4 vs Mig17 in vietnam. I really only have a few problems with the F22 and the F35.
Cost is just plain stupid. The F22 sorry but I don't think having weapons doors on a fighter is very smart, ie if they malfunction you only have a gun, they obviously didn't learn anything from the F4 not having a gun in vietnam. The F35 they are trying to make it out to be too many things in one airframe, hard to make it work and be good at any one thing that way. Not saying the Russians or anyone else haven't done the same but they look at things differently.
True, but if it didn't have the doors and then it wouldn't be stealth. And the F35 may be built to do a lot of things, but it's still an amazing aircraft. There's not many things in the Russian/Chinese arsenal that could out do it. And in cost, it's about the same as the Eurofighter Typhoon.
I'd say it'll be amazing if they get it to fill all the hype they are trying to get to do. More than likely you won't see anything in the russian or chinese arsenal that will, as they don't have the same ideals when it comes to military equipment as the gadget and gizmo crazed western militarys do. As for the typhoon I haven't exactly seen too many of them in inventory to say they are a large enough force to worry about.
@ClancD Well Ty. An I'm sure you know that now that Russia is part of NATO where it got its tech, also why they want to have the US missle defense system. Since they are privledge to some what open military capabilities. Also the F-18 has been upgraded to 3 different platforms so urm the MiG-35 is still outdated.
The F-35 would certainly win. As times moves on, the kinks are being worked out of the great aircraft. Once ready for production by 2012, the F-35 may be most advanced fighter yet, more so than even the F-22.
That is the vertical takeoff version 1:40........part of MD Boeing and Military RFP...I rather see a wing of drones fully armed for Canadian Air Force
The F-35 is the Fastest strongest fighter in the world right now, it can out fly out manuver and shoot the Mig, But migs are good , but theres a reason the six day war lead to so many of them being destroyed and that was the USA made F-14 Tomcat
@MrBlackfoot93 actually it was france who made the mirage and it was better trained and motivated pilots who made the Mirage win America still held an arms embargo against Israel so thats why Israel was using super Sherman bought from France and centurions from england while Jordan was useing pattons and bulldogs from America
@Elfulcrum777 Really so your telling me that the newest Mig that aused no issues cause facts of our 5th generation fighters and the russians 5th generation fighters, both the f-22 and f-35 proved better than it. and yes there was one outpost in the six day war that used the US made F-14, try to learn every fact next time asshole
@MrBlackfoot93 you are a total idiot, they used the mirage 3CJ in 1967 the F-14 didn't have its first flight until the 1970's and didn't hit production until 1974 what the hell makes you think it was in the six day war? the MiG-35 has never gone up against the f-35 or f-22 , only the Su-30mki of the Indian air force went up against it in mock combat and it did fairly well, the Mig-35 employs the same technology as found on the F-35 with the exception of stealth,features
@Elfulcrum777 In one of the newest issues of te Airforce time it talks about the russians release of their %th generation stealth fighter, they realesed the facts on it as well like firepower speed and other capabilities, this new fighter did not impress US DOD officials that were at the unveiling, And you are correct about the F-14, My source of information added the ! to that, we supplied Israel With f-4 Phantoms
@MrBlackfoot93 Yes you supplied Israel with the F4E phantom in the yom kippur war which the Israelis modified look up F4E 2000 if you don't believe me, just because a couple of US officials weren't impressed doesn't automatically mean the MiG-35 is going to suck, it may look like a MiG-29 which was nothing more than cannon fodder, but its not a 29 many innovations have been made on this plane, besides what you see here is only a prototype, regular engines, the production version is much better
@MrBlackfoot93 Also , F-22's stealth features doesn't make it immune to detection, in mock dogfights jets like the Euro-fighter typhoon gained radar lock on F-22 from a surprisingly long range, and the F-35 is not as stealthy as the F-22 and is slower only one engine, cannot super-cruise and is no more maneuverable than an F-16 block 52, the production MiG-35 will be able to super-cruise, it will have thrust vectoring nozzles it will be much faster and its AESA radar will detect VLO targets
-US F-35 Lightning II AESA Radar:(APG-81) Maximum detect airborne threat 140-160 km and number of targets remain unknown. Turbofan engines:(F135) no supercruise or thrust vectoring.
-Russia Mig-35 Fulcrum-F AESA Radar:(Zhuk-AE) Maximum detect airborne threat 160 km and number of targets 30. Turbofan engines:(RD-33 OVT) 3D Thrust Vectoring Control but no supercruise.
I wouldn't put F-35 Lightning II vs Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The good match up would be F-16E/F Block 60 Viper vs Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The latest F-16 model is the new F-18E/F or F-16IN Block 70 Super Viper. The F-16IN Super Viper is a unique new fighter sharing a heritage with the world's only fifth generation fighters the F-35 Lightning II and the F-22 Raptor. Evolutionary integration of fifth generation technologies makes the F-16IN the most advanced fourth generation fighter in the world today.
For starters, it won't lock onto the Mig at 185km. Nothing about the APG-81 has been released yet, so no one can make a statement like that. Also, the Mig has a reduced RCS, so it won;t lock on at that range anyway.
At 85km? Can you prove that?
How the hell does DAS help? DAS is purely situational awareness, it does not target people, so it makes no difference in WVR. I'm 99% sure that both pilots will know the other's presence at WVR distances.
BVR is a little different. Over 50km, Mig-35 can dodge missiles with it's 3d tvc, but will have trouble locking onto the f-35 at that range. Overall, I think that the Mig-35 has the upperhand.
great planes.funny is though that each is based on oponent's other design.the mig 29 is inspired from the great american F 15 and the F 35 is inspired from underestimated russian Yak 141.
This is not a good comparison. The JSF is more of a strike (air to ground) jet while the MiG-35 is air superiority. In air to air combat, there is no contest. The MiG wins here.
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
Depends on the situation, The F-35 wasn't designed to dogfight, it was designed to be multi-role. If it needed to take out a target, it would use AMRAAM from long range, or AIM-9Xs with the JMHCS. JMHCS = Pilot points helmet at target, locks, and missile fires. Maneuvering is irrelevant with the F-35.
@iamidiotic F-15/16 in Serbia were latest versions at the time while Serb MiGs were low grade export MiGs with half the avionics not even working. you are comparing apples and oranges. You ask an 1982 F-16A without radar or ground control to fight a latest block F-15C or Block 60 F-16 with all the latest stuff with full support. You'll have same thing.
@iamidiotic F-35 is NOT a dogfighter. its shape is not optimized for maneuvering but more for stealth and even its stealth is only good at dead-on while a lot worse from sides and totally bad at rear.MiGs rate of roll, turn, acceleration is higher and today is production-ready with TVC available NOW while F-35 is over-budget, heavily delayed, Denmark is not buying it now and program is looking very uncertain. F-35 cant turn, run or climb better then MiG. All F-35 has is limited stealth
@Spetsnazovets It was never supposed to dogfight either way, as its avionics and systems make maneuvering irrelevant. If the U.S. needed to shoot down some fighters, it would cal in its F-22s, then use the JSF's as a strike package. And don't even start with the "F-22 is dead" bullshit I've been hearing from communism states. I am equally intrigued by the latest Flanker and Fulcrum designs. Imo, these two aircraft can't be compared.
F-22 is not dead lol they will simply not make any more then 187 of them. Problem is that AIM-120D will have hard time killing TVC Flankers and TVC Fulcrums with full combat avionics and ECM suites at max distances since their mid-course guidance gets jammed by latest gen SAP-514 pods on wingtips and also they can't maneuver too well. AIM-120 can kill heavy planes, but fighters are a very hard target. TVC Fulcrum/Flanker can outturn AMRAAM like F-22 can with R-27.
Sukhoi and Mig fighter won't able to dodge US next Air to Air missiles. This missiles could destroyed Sukhoi PAK T-50, Su-35BM Super Flanker E, Su-34 Fullback, Su-33 Navy Flanker, Mig-31BM Foxhound, Mig-35 Fulcrum-F, and Mig-29SMT. This missiles is much better than AIM-120D. This missiles got better guidance and more range than your R-77M1 aka RVV-MD. Well it is called Joint Dual Role Air Dominance Missile aka JDRADM.
@USAAIRPOWER Well thats only natural that US develop a new-gen missile. AMRAAM is an old design and to be honest its about time they made a new one. Whole weapons development is a game of tennis: one makes a weapon, other responds with a better one and back and forth that goes. Still its only in development yet. We are talking here, available for production now, And don't forget it should fit into F-22/35 engine bays which means fairly short length. Lets see what happens once its in service :)
Yes. Because we know so much about the PAK FA and the new gen of American AAMs. Seriously, the US hasn't even announced a new one, whereas Russia has, so Russia is in the lead.
85km? Where did you get that number from, it was never proven in any wargames or anything.
The thing is, you have NO INFORMATION about ANY of these things, so don't say anything unless you do.
@iamidiotic See my point here is that F-35 will be nowhere near as maneuverable as F-22 and hence will not be able to safely defeat a BVR missile like F-22/Su-35 because the R-27 comes with IR seeker unlike AMRAAM and if Flanker fires a salvo of 2-3 he can fire 3-4 salvos like that while F-35 is left with only two 2-round salvos or even just one (internal load only). One missile at a time doesn't guarantee a 100% kill.
I think F35 would beat MiG-35 purly on stealth another thing is that its not a fair comparison simply because MiG-35 in reality is a stretched up and souped up old MiG-29 where as F35 is gen5 fighter with entire weapons payload Inside rather than the traditional hard points of the MiG
@cmyducgo Most never look into overall capability. All they know is compare the speed and watched vids of both maneuvering. None have seen the F-35A being pushed to limit and not even the more towards ground attack /close air support variant the F-35B replacing AV-8B. F-35's radar, avionics, RWR are proven especially the AIM-120C7/D & AIM-9X have highest hit chance
The mig 35 looks so nato with the grey paint sceme , how ever the f-35 way better it has the avionics an look an shoot ability where the pilot does not have to maneuver to fight the pilot can just look an fire plus the aesa radar an das the f-35 is far a better choice.
@homboy107 Until you learn some hard facts don't open your mouth. DAS is NOT a targeting system and still no missile can fire and turn 180 degrees after launch. Fighter MUST maneuver to get into a firing position and if there is a missile coming what will you do I'd like to know?
@Spetsnazovets ok didnt you just see the dog on video also the jet doesn't have to maneuver just to get a shot , why do you think the hud is in the helmint for?? , and a missle site wouldnt find the f-35 unless it had an error with the bombay doors , weapons on the wing , and i know my facts just some times they dont come out right in typeing its better to say it in person.
@iamidiotic And what MiG-29 were there? 1989 standard with inoperative avionics and radar against latest batch F-15/16. Funnily a MiG-29 dodged 3 AIM-120Cs while unable to see where they are shot from.
Stealth is a major discriminator between a 5G fighter like the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter and "Gen 4 plus plus" competitors like the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-35 Fulcrum and the Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker that are essentially modernizations of their respective progenitors, the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 and the Sukhoi Su-27. No operational Soviet or Russian stealth aircraft has ever been reported to have entered service.
Russians have some good specific system technologies, their ability to effectively integrate them often lags behind that of the West, and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter takes integration of off-board intelligence to a step well beyond proven Russian capabilities.
ojala friend that we provide support for U.S. fighters in the air against Venezuela jajajaja because we are threatening each time they will get in trouble xDD jajajajaja
F-35 Lightning II would win over Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The Mig-35 Fulcrum-F only oppose a little threat. Mig-35 Phazotron Zhuk AESA radar can't track stealth aircraft. Mig-35 is useless. The Mig-35 Fulcrum-F is not F-35 rival. F-35 rival is Mig-LMFS. Mig-35 Fulcrum-F rival is F-16E/F Desert Falcon & F-18E/F Super Hornet.
Watch & listen the video closely dumbass. The Pacific Vision game, performance, & everything never taken places or happen. Too bad there weren't any evidence F-22, F-35, & F-18E/F ever got beaten by Russia Sukhoi fighters. See your a dumbass they weren't any Mig fighter. I guess Russia are dumbass also dummer to their close allied like China & India. LOL
Pacific Vision is Red Flag in Hawaii just like Red Flag in Nellis Air Force base in Nevada, USA! Also in Alaska & Canada. Also Red October in Germany. I guess your dumbass never heard of Operation Red Flag Exercise. There isn't proof & evidence that USA F-22, F-35, & F-18E/F ever good against real Russian Sukhoi fighter. Too bad loser!
PowerRussia is just a dumbass, slut, & bitches Russia. I guess she still piss off the way Soviet Union died and angry at USA. Well that what Russia deserve when you embarrassed USA in Vietnam. PowerRussia video are all crap and also she cut of some scene part.
(1) watch?v=5N0iXFN37iU&feature=channel_page-There weren't any evidence, proof, result, & pacific vision ever taken
(2) watch?v=FFpem56iDB4&feature=channel_page-Hoax & Fake. WTF what with F-35 picture. F-22 crash on airfield was at Nellis Air Force. F-22 only crash in USA not China. The video look similar to other fake video J-10 beat F-22 & Eurofighter beat F-22. All those are fake and also Hoax.
(3) watch?v=3K0F-5RokQ8&feature=channel_page-copy from USA video Stealth. The last time I check F/A-37 & other stealth knock off 3 Su-37 Terminator off the sky.
(4) watch?v=w6HhKxk0i-g&feature=channel_page-F-22 beat Su-47! Also Russia Scramjet got destroyed in Space. Also that bitch cut of some of scene part
(5) watch?v=Tg1NbWSQXEM&feature=channel_page-Ace Combat 6 first of all Emmeria is resemble to USA while Estovakia is Soviet Union. In the game Estovakia are the B Guy
Nice. I like the MIG. And for me it (the mig) is the winner! Comunque il MiG credo che vada più veloce del f-35? Bel video comunque. Sempre tante immagini che spiegano bene come sono fatti. Il nuovo inserimento del "By Typhoon" prima di Littleboy è bello e in particolare con il missile dietro è molto d'effetto! Grande!
grazie mille rabadasho...cmq si...il mig è molto + veloce dell'f-35 /mach 2.2 contro mach 1.7) e grazie anche x l'apprezzamento dell'uscita ad effetto ^_^
@Littleboy0830 Oh sure, the MiG could take an F-35 out.....if it doesn't get shot out of the sky without the pilot ever know what hit them. The Sukhoi PAK FA has a much better chance.
@baronofcheese The F-35 is an exportable aircraft developed along with countries like Turkey. Its stealth technology is not even near to invisible by MiG-35's AESA Radar, at least not to the point where AMRAAMs and AMRAAMskis can be fired with fatal accuracy.
F-117( 2X) was shot down by 30 years old air defence system!!!
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz you do realize, that the F117 is from the 80s, right? and that that's just when the govt. says it was finished? And that it wasn't shot down because it wasn't stealth, it was because some lucky serb sprayed a bunch of AA guns and rockets in there when he heard it and got a hit on it. It was merely a test for later stealth aircraft anyways. You have to realize, the USAF has never shown all it's cards. We had the SR71 developing in the late 50s!
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
Russian laser weapon technology 25-50 !!!!!!! years.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz How can you honestly think the Russians are technologically more advanced than us?! They haven't even finished their 5th generation fighter jets, and we have had them since the 90s.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr They haven't even finished their 5th generation fighter jets, and ...hahahahahah because don't need. !!!.what you mean 5th generation , Russia can shot down any USA-stealth plane whit ZERO problems. stealth technology?, who has in production ? Russia has ballistic missile 6th generation ?. . did USA finish EMP conventional weapon, NOT, but British ( very small radius).
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz USA advanced airborne radar is from Russian technology !!!!!!!
electronics package for the F-15 Eagle from Russian technology etc.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Russia shut down plans from Laser canon 35 year before USA !!. Did USA has 6th generation A/A missile 200 km or space ship?.who has the best air defense system?,Corvettes ,attack helicopters end 100 more.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz It's hilarious how this kid actually thinks that Russia is superior to the USAF. We have all that Russia has and much more, we just keep it quiet, not bragging about it on the internet. We've had secret technology from the Germans since WW2. And Russia didn't shoot down planes with lasers over 35 years ago dumbs. And what good are those missiles if they cannot lock on?! And space ships? We landed on the moon, you never could. And we have the best air defense dumb ass.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr We've had secret technology from the Germans since WW2. ....hahahahahaha Germany has technology from Poland end Russia, go to YT 1/3- Secret Russian Aircraft of WWII
.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz What the fuck are you talking about? Germany had stealth bombers in WW2. Look up the horten Ho IX. Poland has nothing to do with it either. The Germans had discovered anti gravity technology by WW2, they never got to put it to use because it was all lost from allied bombings. If you want to know about REAL secret tech, look up Bob Lazar.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr USAF has never shown all it's cards .....lake Russia. SR-71 is one multi billions design disaster you know way ? original was design for caring one atomic bomb.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz What on earth are you talking about?! It's not a billion, it's 33 million per model. And where did you get atomic bomb carrying from? It's called the SR71, SR= Stealth Reconaissance.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr hhahahah lake first person on the Moon was Twardowski from Poland. Stealth technology is a myth. Stealth technology is only parts from 5th generation planes F- 22 or F-35 is not 5th generation planes. is lake SU-35 or Mig35. USA produce only 2-3 planes F-22 whit original design end original materials. . ONLY 3 MAXIMUM.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz He's a character from Polish folklore. And really, stealth is fake? Then why is it winning it's mock battles and simulations because the other aircraft can't lock on? Why does it have virtually no radar signature? Your a complete brainwashed dumb ass. The Su35 and Mig35 are SHIT to an F22, in testing it was recorded that 92% of the time, the F22 will beat them in AA. And your last part is utter bullshit too, there have been hundreds of them made.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Then why is it winning it's mock battles...because on simulation is original project F-22 whit not Russian technology for Russian Air Forces but only for export . Niedwiediev ask US specialist when US well be used true the best weapon on simulators . about SR-71 project cost 30milions ?. ask SR-71 pilots about original project destination. ONE ATOMIC weapon. US engineering's make big mistake, atomic bomb was to heavy so install on SR-71 spay instrument.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr go to Google "F-22 end F-35 problems cover up"
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Yeah, the problem was the cost, that was the only problem. Everything else is from an exaggerated news report based off of 'anonymous sources' which means, it is COMPLETE BULLSHIT.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr 2004 Indian and American Air Forces held their first joint combat exercise, where the score between F-16 and Mig-29 was close to 9 to 1 in favour of Migs. At that time even the US media wrote about the USAF in front of the senate committee asking for money for the Raptor (latest US fighter). They called it a political suicide to tell the American public that the government is putting their pilots in an aircraft where they are probably going to die at a rate of 9 to 1
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAThat is BULLSHIT dude you make me laugh. the F16? to a MiG29?! the F16 is undefeated!! Fuckin MiG going 9:1 against the F16? MY ASS. man you gave me a good f'in laugh there.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAThat is BULLSHIT dude you make me laugh. the F16? to a MiG29?! the F16 is undefeated....go to Gwalior, February 14-26, 2004 Indian
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Poland has nothing to do with it either....... hahahha You have not idea how meany new design is from Poland from 1930-1939 to Germany end British planes.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Okay, big whoop, Poland had a couple nice airplane designs before war, like that means shit since all of Germany's masterpieces were designed DURING the war.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr The F-15 lost another battle with Russia’s Su-27 in the autumn of 2000, during the US-Japanese drills in the Pacific Ocean. Two Su-27 jets, covering the Su-24MP, conducted a sudden attack of the flagship of the US 7th fleet, Kitty Hawk. The US aircraft carrier would have been destroyed in real combat conditions.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz HAHAHAHAHAHAHA that was almost as funny as the first. The F15 is also undefeated, but by an even greater margin. And a US carrier would not fall to a couple of russian jet. Gosh do you just reach in your ass and pull this shit out? You have so many of these faked incidents made by the Chinese/Russian govt.'s to promote their AF.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr F15 is also undefeated,....hahahahahahahahaha because USA NEVER fight against Russian Domestic Planes NEVER HAPPEN , after Vietnam. USA never fight against country whit military satellite system end AWACS support, NEVER. USA fight only whit old Russian exports weapon . US end NATO is scary Russian Domestic weapon
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Su-24MP
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr tell me, way US end NATO NEVER attack North Korea ?
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Because we don't need another war
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlindBusDrivr Because we don't need another war.......hahahahah after IIWW US fighting 56 years !
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
it's just a matter of time before the F-18 is replaced with another air superiority fighter more like the F-14 as will be seen as necessary by the U.S. Navy.
ejasonrichmond 2 months ago
Comment removed
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
On 3:23 is not Mig-35 but Su-30MKI
Dvadesetdevetka 3 months ago
you don't fkin know what your talking about, so many experts here on the net just so funny
dharmdevil 4 months ago
F-35 etc -NATO air to air missle max 90km after 2018. T-50 PAK end MIG-35 to be armed with state-of-the-art missiles 200km
Zbyszkoz 4 months ago
@Zbyszkoz To bad they can't lock onto our stealth jest :/
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Stealth aircraft whit turn on radar, not any more stealth
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Then why did the Eurofighter loose simulations against the F22 because it couldn't lock? dumb ass
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlindBusDrivr Eurofighter loose simulations against the F22 because it couldn't lock? dumb ass..... end dump ass, Eurofighter flaying, F-22 not ZERO COMBAT. Russia in 2012 start production 6th generation air to air missile up to 200km .good bay Stealth planes
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlindBusDrivr Russian air to air State-of-the-art missiles
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Reuters quoted the official as saying, in the end the CIA intercepted military communications in China, found that the F-22 aircraft was shot down by Chinese fighters intercepted and crashed in the mountains islands off the coast of Zhejiang
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz Why would we have to intercept their communications? We know every move every F22 takes, they are highly valued, and only a couple dozen made. And btw dumb ass story is fake, no F22 has flown any sortie or mission over China. If China shot down an F22, it would be national news, but it's never happened, nor will it.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr U.S. "Christian Economic Journal" on February 3 published an article written by the U.S. defense experts Kai Mike's article, alluding to China's threat to U.S. aircraft in the Western Pacific region of the air and condemned the U.S. government to conceal three downed F-22 is the fact that taxpayers can not tell more than 300 million dollars have been buried in Zhongnanhai.
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
@Zbyszkoz This is the biggest load of bullshit I have ever heard. No F22 has ever been shot down, no less by some dumb ass Chinese jet, which is just a copy based off old US tech. It was just a hoax made up for Chinese propaganda, if they could beat our jets, they wouldn't be spending billions to catch up.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr Report: Iran 'Blinded' CIA Spy Satellite
Sunday, 18 December 2011 14:48
European intelligence source claims Iran stuns West by 'aiming a laser burst quite accurately' at US satellite in never before reported incident. US official: If Russians provided Iran with sophisticated jamming equipment it means a lot else is at risk too
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
Comment removed
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Zbyszkoz USA technology is behind Russia from 15 to 40 years
..................military missile technology 8-15 years. EMP conventional weapon 25-40 years, thermonuclear energy 25-45 years,
Zbyszkoz 2 months ago
An F-35 can be shot down with a six willed truck a bridge and an experienced badass. The MiG is always vulnerable to the eternal bane of Soviet Aircraft: American archers with flaming arrows and red headbands.
DINDRAGON 6 months ago
F35 Rules.
FPSNZ 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FPSNZ F35 Rules..............hahahahahahaha F-35 corrosion problem and much much more
Zbyszkoz 4 months ago
Was surfing google a bit and i just saw that Mig35 is 30milion dolar wich makes him like waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead of F35... for price of f35 u can buy 6 mig 35 .... an army of 100f35 vs 600mig35 guess who would win -.-
MrLawbringer 7 months ago
Well this stealh tech that f35 has seems preaty awersome . f35 cant posibly match mig in any way sept this stealth thing (for witch i think russians dont give a demn instaling in mig) and well price of mig wont exeed 100mil while f is nearly 200mil -.-
MrLawbringer 7 months ago
Funny because the MIG-25 is still the fastest jet fighter on earth and don't give me the SR-71 bullshit because its not a jet fighter... honestly the F-35 is a piece of garbage when compared to the F-22 or MIG-31... even the MIG-25 is better than it and that's being phased out.
HirachieOfSociety 9 months ago
the f-35 pownes
tonygogap 11 months ago
wow...how our western governments don't see how diabolical this plane is going to be I do not know, but for one thing the MiG-35 can outmaneuver the F-35 like a bitch. Someone please tell who's smart idea it was to convince the US that their Navy needs a single engined fighter instead of a two engined fighter? What happens when they have engine failure? Oh wait...they can't just shut an engine down...they have to ditch. I'm all for western technology, but fuck the F-35 and our wasted billions.
louisletrekk 11 months ago
The Americans think they are by far the best....WRONG!!its the RUSSIANS !!
greetings NETHERLANDS.
richardburns1560 11 months ago
If I had to choose I'd pick the one based on a proven design not one that is over budget and trying to fill every niche the military can think of. So my choice is the Mig. The F 35 is a joke, a bottomless pit for the US military to through money at. As far as the DoD not being impressed, you think they would actually risk backlash to say the Mig is a good plane. Hell no everyone of them will say the US plane is better. Nobody ever said how the Mig 29 did against US planes in mock combat either.
thumper1519 11 months ago 3
@thumper1519 The F15 is 11-0 against MiG 29s. That's in real combat. If the F35 is a joke, why are the Russian companies trying to make superior jets to counter it? A MiG 35 against an F35, now that just wouldn't even by fair the MiG.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr
Let's see first the mig35 isn't an older mig29 anymore than the F15 is the same as a F35 so using that combat record is for totally different planes. Second, the mig29's that have been shot down by the F15 ( which is still a damn good plane) weren't exactly flown by experienced or willing to really fight kind of pilots.
thumper1519 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr
Third, all countries that have a large military budget constantly try to build the next best thing when it comes to planes. If nobody tried to one up anyone else we'd still be flying sopwith camels or spads.
thumper1519 2 months ago
@thumper1519 well obviously. And my point was that the F15 had defeated many MiGs before, and regardless of the plane itself, the F15 pilots in the USAF work on AA and nothing else. And the F22, would destroy the Su35. According to simulations the Rafale vs Su35 has a ratio of 1:1, the Eurofighter would win 82% of the time, and the F22 would beat it 92% of the time.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr
Agreed, that was my point, pilot skill can and has made up for a seemingly inferior plane in ACTUAL combat. The problem with simulations is just that a simulation with rules and limits on the risks pilots are aloowed to take. A good case of old inferior plane making it hard on a modern jet is the F4 vs Mig17 in vietnam. I really only have a few problems with the F22 and the F35.
thumper1519 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr
Cost is just plain stupid. The F22 sorry but I don't think having weapons doors on a fighter is very smart, ie if they malfunction you only have a gun, they obviously didn't learn anything from the F4 not having a gun in vietnam. The F35 they are trying to make it out to be too many things in one airframe, hard to make it work and be good at any one thing that way. Not saying the Russians or anyone else haven't done the same but they look at things differently.
thumper1519 2 months ago
@thumper1519
True, but if it didn't have the doors and then it wouldn't be stealth. And the F35 may be built to do a lot of things, but it's still an amazing aircraft. There's not many things in the Russian/Chinese arsenal that could out do it. And in cost, it's about the same as the Eurofighter Typhoon.
BlindBusDrivr 2 months ago
@BlindBusDrivr
I'd say it'll be amazing if they get it to fill all the hype they are trying to get to do. More than likely you won't see anything in the russian or chinese arsenal that will, as they don't have the same ideals when it comes to military equipment as the gadget and gizmo crazed western militarys do. As for the typhoon I haven't exactly seen too many of them in inventory to say they are a large enough force to worry about.
thumper1519 2 months ago
how dare you compare a F-35 to a paper plane!
illestevo8 1 year ago
Wow the Mig 35 looks exactly like a F-18...........
grrgrr308 1 year ago
@grrgrr308 It's just an upgraded MiG29, which is considered to be almost identical to the F/A-18C/D in capability. Astute observation.
ClancD 1 year ago
@ClancD Well Ty. An I'm sure you know that now that Russia is part of NATO where it got its tech, also why they want to have the US missle defense system. Since they are privledge to some what open military capabilities. Also the F-18 has been upgraded to 3 different platforms so urm the MiG-35 is still outdated.
grrgrr308 1 year ago
The F-35 would certainly win. As times moves on, the kinks are being worked out of the great aircraft. Once ready for production by 2012, the F-35 may be most advanced fighter yet, more so than even the F-22.
MrVolcanoes22 1 year ago
That is the vertical takeoff version 1:40........part of MD Boeing and Military RFP...I rather see a wing of drones fully armed for Canadian Air Force
InterHaydn 1 year ago
The F-35 is the Fastest strongest fighter in the world right now, it can out fly out manuver and shoot the Mig, But migs are good , but theres a reason the six day war lead to so many of them being destroyed and that was the USA made F-14 Tomcat
MrBlackfoot93 1 year ago
@MrBlackfoot93 actually it was france who made the mirage and it was better trained and motivated pilots who made the Mirage win America still held an arms embargo against Israel so thats why Israel was using super Sherman bought from France and centurions from england while Jordan was useing pattons and bulldogs from America
Elchingonthegreat 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 Really so your telling me that the newest Mig that aused no issues cause facts of our 5th generation fighters and the russians 5th generation fighters, both the f-22 and f-35 proved better than it. and yes there was one outpost in the six day war that used the US made F-14, try to learn every fact next time asshole
MrBlackfoot93 1 year ago
@MrBlackfoot93 you are a total idiot, they used the mirage 3CJ in 1967 the F-14 didn't have its first flight until the 1970's and didn't hit production until 1974 what the hell makes you think it was in the six day war? the MiG-35 has never gone up against the f-35 or f-22 , only the Su-30mki of the Indian air force went up against it in mock combat and it did fairly well, the Mig-35 employs the same technology as found on the F-35 with the exception of stealth,features
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 In one of the newest issues of te Airforce time it talks about the russians release of their %th generation stealth fighter, they realesed the facts on it as well like firepower speed and other capabilities, this new fighter did not impress US DOD officials that were at the unveiling, And you are correct about the F-14, My source of information added the ! to that, we supplied Israel With f-4 Phantoms
MrBlackfoot93 1 year ago
@MrBlackfoot93 Yes you supplied Israel with the F4E phantom in the yom kippur war which the Israelis modified look up F4E 2000 if you don't believe me, just because a couple of US officials weren't impressed doesn't automatically mean the MiG-35 is going to suck, it may look like a MiG-29 which was nothing more than cannon fodder, but its not a 29 many innovations have been made on this plane, besides what you see here is only a prototype, regular engines, the production version is much better
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
@Elfulcrum777 It's essentially a highly sophisticated MiG-29, bro, like the F-16 block 60+ is essentially an F-16.
DINDRAGON 6 months ago
@MrBlackfoot93 Also , F-22's stealth features doesn't make it immune to detection, in mock dogfights jets like the Euro-fighter typhoon gained radar lock on F-22 from a surprisingly long range, and the F-35 is not as stealthy as the F-22 and is slower only one engine, cannot super-cruise and is no more maneuverable than an F-16 block 52, the production MiG-35 will be able to super-cruise, it will have thrust vectoring nozzles it will be much faster and its AESA radar will detect VLO targets
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
Comment removed
Elfulcrum777 1 year ago
i hope 2 see them in battle in the middle east
solimaniv 1 year ago
Where from the small front wings came into the Mig-35 in 00:59 and 03:21 ? Strange.
namrur2 1 year ago
-F-35 Air to Air Weapons:
USA:(AIM-9X Block 2, AIM-120D, and JDRADM will appear in 2020)
EU:(AIM-132 ASRAAM, IRIS-T, and MBDA Meteor)
-Mig-35 Air to Air weapons:
Russia:(R-74M Archer & R-77M1 Adder)
Other Systems:(OLS-35 AIRST)
So the question is it which is better F-35 or Mig-35. The answer is the F-35 thanks to HMDS, EO DAS, EOTS, and Meteor Missiles).
SilentEagles 1 year ago
-US F-35 Sensors, communications, & protection system:(Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System, Electro-Optical Targeting System, F35 Communications, Navigation / Identification, F35 Electronic Warfare System, and F35 Helmet Mounted Display System).
-Russia Mig-35 Sensor, Communication, and Protection systems:(HMD and ELT/568(V)2 jammer systems)
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles
Hello there,
(-Russia Mig-35 Sensor, Communication, and Protection systems:(HMD and ELT/568(V)2 jammer systems)
Do you know if the F35 has got one of these ELT systems or somthing newer.
ht tps://ww w.myaoc.or g/eweb/images/aoc_library/Events/2002/102802_CONV/02CONV_Proceedings/Day2/Track2/Bacchelli.pdf
this is what I got for Eurofighters Cross Eye.
G777GUN 8 months ago
-US F-35 Lightning II AESA Radar:(APG-81) Maximum detect airborne threat 140-160 km and number of targets remain unknown. Turbofan engines:(F135) no supercruise or thrust vectoring.
-Russia Mig-35 Fulcrum-F AESA Radar:(Zhuk-AE) Maximum detect airborne threat 160 km and number of targets 30. Turbofan engines:(RD-33 OVT) 3D Thrust Vectoring Control but no supercruise.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
I wouldn't put F-35 Lightning II vs Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The good match up would be F-16E/F Block 60 Viper vs Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The latest F-16 model is the new F-18E/F or F-16IN Block 70 Super Viper. The F-16IN Super Viper is a unique new fighter sharing a heritage with the world's only fifth generation fighters the F-35 Lightning II and the F-22 Raptor. Evolutionary integration of fifth generation technologies makes the F-16IN the most advanced fourth generation fighter in the world today.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@N1cholas240
For starters, it won't lock onto the Mig at 185km. Nothing about the APG-81 has been released yet, so no one can make a statement like that. Also, the Mig has a reduced RCS, so it won;t lock on at that range anyway.
At 85km? Can you prove that?
How the hell does DAS help? DAS is purely situational awareness, it does not target people, so it makes no difference in WVR. I'm 99% sure that both pilots will know the other's presence at WVR distances.
RFXCGZZ 1 year ago
WVR Mig-35 wins hands down.
BVR is a little different. Over 50km, Mig-35 can dodge missiles with it's 3d tvc, but will have trouble locking onto the f-35 at that range. Overall, I think that the Mig-35 has the upperhand.
RFXCGZZ 1 year ago
great planes.funny is though that each is based on oponent's other design.the mig 29 is inspired from the great american F 15 and the F 35 is inspired from underestimated russian Yak 141.
catalintotan 1 year ago
Lame. The first photo is a MiG-29 SMT. What does this retarded music have to do with it?
Malodorok 1 year ago
F-35 would take the mig out before the MIG pilot knows theres a f-35 in the sky.
IamDuhmb 1 year ago
This is not a good comparison. The JSF is more of a strike (air to ground) jet while the MiG-35 is air superiority. In air to air combat, there is no contest. The MiG wins here.
edwong3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
taekarkung 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
taekarkung 1 year ago
Mig-35 vs F-35, I'll vote for F-35. F-35A is meant for air superiority and much likely to be fitted with TVC plus without the lift engine, it will be much lighter than the heavy F-35B (meant for attack role replacing AV-8B). The partial released specs are not final & not confirmed. Stealth, good RWR, radar, BVR, ECM, ECCM, maneuverability, range, payload capability with proven effective weapons counts. F-35 has all this
taekarkung 1 year ago
I'm in love with Russian aircraft ...
're The best in technology and are always innovating ...
But I do not think that the MIG35 is the height of an opponent F35.
Aliases are aircraft with different aims, disparate technologies.
I think the T50 will be the most formivel fighter of all time and even the double F22 and F35 will be able to supplant them in the air.
hug
SnakColors 1 year ago
Depends on the situation, The F-35 wasn't designed to dogfight, it was designed to be multi-role. If it needed to take out a target, it would use AMRAAM from long range, or AIM-9Xs with the JMHCS. JMHCS = Pilot points helmet at target, locks, and missile fires. Maneuvering is irrelevant with the F-35.
iamidiotic 1 year ago
@iamidiotic F-15/16 in Serbia were latest versions at the time while Serb MiGs were low grade export MiGs with half the avionics not even working. you are comparing apples and oranges. You ask an 1982 F-16A without radar or ground control to fight a latest block F-15C or Block 60 F-16 with all the latest stuff with full support. You'll have same thing.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@iamidiotic F-35 is NOT a dogfighter. its shape is not optimized for maneuvering but more for stealth and even its stealth is only good at dead-on while a lot worse from sides and totally bad at rear.MiGs rate of roll, turn, acceleration is higher and today is production-ready with TVC available NOW while F-35 is over-budget, heavily delayed, Denmark is not buying it now and program is looking very uncertain. F-35 cant turn, run or climb better then MiG. All F-35 has is limited stealth
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@Spetsnazovets It was never supposed to dogfight either way, as its avionics and systems make maneuvering irrelevant. If the U.S. needed to shoot down some fighters, it would cal in its F-22s, then use the JSF's as a strike package. And don't even start with the "F-22 is dead" bullshit I've been hearing from communism states. I am equally intrigued by the latest Flanker and Fulcrum designs. Imo, these two aircraft can't be compared.
iamidiotic 1 year ago
F-22 is not dead lol they will simply not make any more then 187 of them. Problem is that AIM-120D will have hard time killing TVC Flankers and TVC Fulcrums with full combat avionics and ECM suites at max distances since their mid-course guidance gets jammed by latest gen SAP-514 pods on wingtips and also they can't maneuver too well. AIM-120 can kill heavy planes, but fighters are a very hard target. TVC Fulcrum/Flanker can outturn AMRAAM like F-22 can with R-27.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@Spetsnazovets There ya go, it really just goes down to the pilot and whatever else he has to his disposal, AWACS, wingmen, etc.
iamidiotic 1 year ago
@Spetsnazovets
Sukhoi and Mig fighter won't able to dodge US next Air to Air missiles. This missiles could destroyed Sukhoi PAK T-50, Su-35BM Super Flanker E, Su-34 Fullback, Su-33 Navy Flanker, Mig-31BM Foxhound, Mig-35 Fulcrum-F, and Mig-29SMT. This missiles is much better than AIM-120D. This missiles got better guidance and more range than your R-77M1 aka RVV-MD. Well it is called Joint Dual Role Air Dominance Missile aka JDRADM.
USAAIRPOWER 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER Well thats only natural that US develop a new-gen missile. AMRAAM is an old design and to be honest its about time they made a new one. Whole weapons development is a game of tennis: one makes a weapon, other responds with a better one and back and forth that goes. Still its only in development yet. We are talking here, available for production now, And don't forget it should fit into F-22/35 engine bays which means fairly short length. Lets see what happens once its in service :)
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@USAAIRPOWER
Yes. Because we know so much about the PAK FA and the new gen of American AAMs. Seriously, the US hasn't even announced a new one, whereas Russia has, so Russia is in the lead.
85km? Where did you get that number from, it was never proven in any wargames or anything.
The thing is, you have NO INFORMATION about ANY of these things, so don't say anything unless you do.
RFXCGZZ 1 year ago
@iamidiotic See my point here is that F-35 will be nowhere near as maneuverable as F-22 and hence will not be able to safely defeat a BVR missile like F-22/Su-35 because the R-27 comes with IR seeker unlike AMRAAM and if Flanker fires a salvo of 2-3 he can fire 3-4 salvos like that while F-35 is left with only two 2-round salvos or even just one (internal load only). One missile at a time doesn't guarantee a 100% kill.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
I think F35 would beat MiG-35 purly on stealth another thing is that its not a fair comparison simply because MiG-35 in reality is a stretched up and souped up old MiG-29 where as F35 is gen5 fighter with entire weapons payload Inside rather than the traditional hard points of the MiG
babukania 1 year ago
Love 2 see mig35 beatz the f-35
luckymaan123 1 year ago
Mig 35 wins
SicMetalArmy 2 years ago
lol you guys smoking crack. the mig has to find the F35 first...
cmyducgo 2 years ago
@cmyducgo Most never look into overall capability. All they know is compare the speed and watched vids of both maneuvering. None have seen the F-35A being pushed to limit and not even the more towards ground attack /close air support variant the F-35B replacing AV-8B. F-35's radar, avionics, RWR are proven especially the AIM-120C7/D & AIM-9X have highest hit chance
taekarkung 1 year ago
The F-35 looks like a fat seal with wings the mig-35 looks a way better as the F-35 and the mig-35 has better maneuvrability
phoenixia07 2 years ago
the Mig 35 can literally fly circles around a F-35 wile it burst in flames after being shoot down by the mig 35. AMEN.
diviengi 2 years ago
The mig 35 looks so nato with the grey paint sceme , how ever the f-35 way better it has the avionics an look an shoot ability where the pilot does not have to maneuver to fight the pilot can just look an fire plus the aesa radar an das the f-35 is far a better choice.
homboy107 2 years ago
@homboy107 Until you learn some hard facts don't open your mouth. DAS is NOT a targeting system and still no missile can fire and turn 180 degrees after launch. Fighter MUST maneuver to get into a firing position and if there is a missile coming what will you do I'd like to know?
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@Spetsnazovets ok didnt you just see the dog on video also the jet doesn't have to maneuver just to get a shot , why do you think the hud is in the helmint for?? , and a missle site wouldnt find the f-35 unless it had an error with the bombay doors , weapons on the wing , and i know my facts just some times they dont come out right in typeing its better to say it in person.
homboy107 1 year ago
F-35 Lightning II would win over Mig--35 Fulcrum-F. Also F-16E/F Block 70 could also beat Mig-35.
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
Mig 29 have beat pile of F-16, F-15 in 1990x. 1:10 in Ugoslavia. Learn history.
TheTimurbest 2 years ago
And the F-16 and the F-15 have taken down your MiG-29 friends in a 5-1 kill ratio in Ugoslavia. Learn YOUR history.
iamidiotic 1 year ago
@iamidiotic And what MiG-29 were there? 1989 standard with inoperative avionics and radar against latest batch F-15/16. Funnily a MiG-29 dodged 3 AIM-120Cs while unable to see where they are shot from.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
don't say nonsense.mig-35 has better radar than f-22 or f-35.F-16 is just a victim for mig-35
andreyRUS17 1 year ago
Effective tracking range for RCS = 1 m2 target
-F-35 Lightning II
AESA Radar:(APG-81 v 1)
Detections:(140-160 km+)
# of Targets:(Classified)
-Mig-35 Fulcrum-F:
AESA Radar:(Zhuk-AE)
Detections:(160 km)
# of Targets:(30 Targets but in engage 6 targets)
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
Mig-35 Fulcrum-F:
-Maximum speed: Mach 2.25 (2,400 km/h, 1,491 mph) at altitude
-Range: 2,000 km (1,240 mi)
-Ferry range: 3,100 km (1,930 mi) with 3 external fuel tanks
-Service ceiling: 17,500 m (57,400 ft)
-Rate of climb: 330 m/s (65,000 ft/min)
-Thrust/weight: 1.03
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
F-35 Lightning II:
-Maximum speed: Mach 1.67 (1,283 mph, 2,065 km/h)
-Range: 1,200 nmi (2,220 km) on internal fuel[213]
-Combat radius: 610 nmi (1,110 km) on internal fuel[213]
-Service ceiling: 60,000 ft (18,288 m)
-Rate of climb: classified (not publicly available)
-Wing loading: 91.4 lb/ft² (446 kg/m²)
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago 2
F 35 is so f...... sexy!! The Russian MIG is good too, but it has no chance in a dog fight vs F 35
clapyourhandsify 2 years ago
lol is this a joke?
watch the specs of both aircraft...
Mig 35 beats the f 35 in a dogfight 100%
in BVR it is somthing diffrent...
Zeljko9292 2 years ago 10
Stealth is a major discriminator between a 5G fighter like the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter and "Gen 4 plus plus" competitors like the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-35 Fulcrum and the Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker that are essentially modernizations of their respective progenitors, the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 and the Sukhoi Su-27. No operational Soviet or Russian stealth aircraft has ever been reported to have entered service.
clapyourhandsify 2 years ago
Russians have some good specific system technologies, their ability to effectively integrate them often lags behind that of the West, and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter takes integration of off-board intelligence to a step well beyond proven Russian capabilities.
clapyourhandsify 2 years ago
@Zeljko9292
Unless F-35 uses DAS...
Beliserius1 9 months ago
@Zeljko9292 yeah exactly everybody keeps making simulations withing visual range so annyoing
RepaleoN 4 months ago
F-35!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BulgarianInCanada 2 years ago
el mig es superior primero porQ es ruso XD luego porQ fue echo para superar el f-35 y el f-22 y llegara a vnzuela en el 2011
mig-35 !!!!!!!
noobulo 2 years ago
ojala friend that we provide support for U.S. fighters in the air against Venezuela jajajaja because we are threatening each time they will get in trouble xDD jajajajaja
jaime99394 2 years ago
F-22 is garbage, so F-35 must be the same product.
And whats about MiG ? MiG is just MiG - quaity and world respect.
Mig29tvc 2 years ago
The F35 is not Americans its a "JOINT" Striker..
97kcoats 2 years ago
F-35 Lightning II would win over Mig-35 Fulcrum-F. The Mig-35 Fulcrum-F only oppose a little threat. Mig-35 Phazotron Zhuk AESA radar can't track stealth aircraft. Mig-35 is useless. The Mig-35 Fulcrum-F is not F-35 rival. F-35 rival is Mig-LMFS. Mig-35 Fulcrum-F rival is F-16E/F Desert Falcon & F-18E/F Super Hornet.
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
F-35 would win and blast Mig-35 out of the sky. F-35 rival is Mig-MFI not Mig-35. F-16E/F Desert Falcon rival is Mig-35 Fulcrum-F.
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
watch?v=5N0iXFN37iU
WATCH THIS
see whether your F-35 is even worthy to compare itself with MIG-35.
lolf08 2 years ago
watch?v=OowCBVh8-_0
Watch & listen the video closely dumbass. The Pacific Vision game, performance, & everything never taken places or happen. Too bad there weren't any evidence F-22, F-35, & F-18E/F ever got beaten by Russia Sukhoi fighters. See your a dumbass they weren't any Mig fighter. I guess Russia are dumbass also dummer to their close allied like China & India. LOL
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
Pacific Vision is Red Flag in Hawaii just like Red Flag in Nellis Air Force base in Nevada, USA! Also in Alaska & Canada. Also Red October in Germany. I guess your dumbass never heard of Operation Red Flag Exercise. There isn't proof & evidence that USA F-22, F-35, & F-18E/F ever good against real Russian Sukhoi fighter. Too bad loser!
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
PowerRussia is just a dumbass, slut, & bitches Russia. I guess she still piss off the way Soviet Union died and angry at USA. Well that what Russia deserve when you embarrassed USA in Vietnam. PowerRussia video are all crap and also she cut of some scene part.
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
PowerRussia Crap video:
(1) watch?v=5N0iXFN37iU&feature=channel_page-There weren't any evidence, proof, result, & pacific vision ever taken
(2) watch?v=FFpem56iDB4&feature=channel_page-Hoax & Fake. WTF what with F-35 picture. F-22 crash on airfield was at Nellis Air Force. F-22 only crash in USA not China. The video look similar to other fake video J-10 beat F-22 & Eurofighter beat F-22. All those are fake and also Hoax.
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
PowerRussia crap video:
(3) watch?v=3K0F-5RokQ8&feature=channel_page-copy from USA video Stealth. The last time I check F/A-37 & other stealth knock off 3 Su-37 Terminator off the sky.
(4) watch?v=w6HhKxk0i-g&feature=channel_page-F-22 beat Su-47! Also Russia Scramjet got destroyed in Space. Also that bitch cut of some of scene part
(5) watch?v=Tg1NbWSQXEM&feature=channel_page-Ace Combat 6 first of all Emmeria is resemble to USA while Estovakia is Soviet Union. In the game Estovakia are the B Guy
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
Send me a message. All the links seems to be broken.
lolf08 2 years ago
scontro ad alta tecnologia! bel video e bella musica:)
Sagaris918 2 years ago
Nice. I like the MIG. And for me it (the mig) is the winner! Comunque il MiG credo che vada più veloce del f-35? Bel video comunque. Sempre tante immagini che spiegano bene come sono fatti. Il nuovo inserimento del "By Typhoon" prima di Littleboy è bello e in particolare con il missile dietro è molto d'effetto! Grande!
rabadasho 2 years ago 3
grazie mille rabadasho...cmq si...il mig è molto + veloce dell'f-35 /mach 2.2 contro mach 1.7) e grazie anche x l'apprezzamento dell'uscita ad effetto ^_^
Littleboy0830 2 years ago
Great video!!
5*****
judokadinu 2 years ago
f35 win :P 5/5
Makarvison 2 years ago
probably...but not understimate the MiG
Littleboy0830 2 years ago
@Littleboy0830
The Mig sucks!
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@Littleboy0830 Oh sure, the MiG could take an F-35 out.....if it doesn't get shot out of the sky without the pilot ever know what hit them. The Sukhoi PAK FA has a much better chance.
baronofcheese 10 months ago
@baronofcheese The F-35 is an exportable aircraft developed along with countries like Turkey. Its stealth technology is not even near to invisible by MiG-35's AESA Radar, at least not to the point where AMRAAMs and AMRAAMskis can be fired with fatal accuracy.
DINDRAGON 6 months ago