We Turkey Turks are the most developed Turkic nation; having the stronges country (best 17th economy in the world and the strongest 8th army on earth).
Tatarstan is concidered "the best" because it's one of the most developped of all Turkic nations, (even though it is still part of the Russian Federation) It has high level of education and Industry along with investments from foreign business. The local oil and gas has alot to do with it
They suffered because of turkic legacy too. Hitler and Stalin brainwashed both russians and germans to hate them. Fact that several tatars like the jews were very succesesful businesmen also did not help when deal with such people as the teutons or the slavs. USA will how ever protect the world now.
To all the tatars here. If these slavic idiots start to vote for the commies again please don't go along with it this time but escape to the West. Remember the 30s and other crimes commited against you by these peasants. They are a jealous bunch. Every sucessful tatar or a jewish person is a synonym to criminal in their peasant eyes. Russia would probaly collapsed if all tatars and jews left.
Tatars is the modern name of volgabulgarians. And i didn't understand why you guys think we are turkic people? Bulgarians have nothing to do with the turkiC people!
the Linzi individuals, they seem to be most highly related to Near Easterners (Turks, Iranians(half population turk), and Iraqis(10 % turk), Armenians, and Eastern Europeans (Slavs, Hungarians), although others, such as Catalans and Iraqis, are mixed in. The Icelanders are twelfth on this list. The high placement of the Vietnamese may be an anomaly, error, or some element of ancient genetic history
Ahrzamanbalasy is not a TATAR he is fucking Mongolian !!
We TATARS are in Origin Turks Ancient Tatars too we are not Mongols !! TATAR population is About 20-25 million and Mongols 2-5 million !! Are you stupid too ???
modern tatars are the mix of all altaic tribes which invaded Europe (huns, avars, gokturks, khazars, bulgars, kypchaks, mongols etc) + assimilated local europeans (60-70% of the population).
we huns are not from altai but from jungaria .avars had two periods in carpathian basin early avars were hephtalites (568-800), late avars were hun ogurs (hungar) (670-2012)
@xDarkNicotine Today's Bulgaria is a mix of decendants of Bulgarians and other tribes, but mostly Thracians which have been in Bulgarian lands many thousands of years, and some newcomer ottoman Turks, mostly of Bulgarian ancestors converted to islam many centuries ago. The same happened with some Bulgarians in Tatarstan. It's peoples' choice and right to be whatever they want. I am talking about ancestry, not choices.
@xDarkNicotine Thank you for telling me that I have nothing to do with Volga Bulgarians
and who are the ancestors of the Bulgarians. Interesting why they never called themselves
Turks, just Bulgarians. Looks like the Turkic world ;)), have the funny habit to tell what the history and the genesis of other peoples should be. Example, the Annatolia Turks tells the Kurds that in reality they are Turks. Bulgarins in Tatarstan and Bulgaria will remain Bulgarians, no matter what the Turks wish.
@tapanar2 lol :) oor common name is TURK..İm oghuz but eu people called turk ..
pesentday bulgarians people dna has nothing with volga bolgars :)))) volga bolgars dna belong to turkic world ;) im sorry for you :)) kurds were not turk but many kurds origin belong to turk
im from karakeçili clan from kayi tribe from oghuz :)) our symbol was IYI << :))) karakeçili tribe has 672 villaga and 3 city in turkey . 200 krakeçili village people are speaking kurdish in turkey.. but they know their origin
@xDarkNicotine Volga Bulgars are East European origin not Turkic. modern Volga Tatars is a blend of Eastern European and Finno-Ugric peoples. only 10% Kazan Tatars is Turkic origin)).
@xDarkNicotine firstly I am not Volga Bulgrs im Russian I! Further, the Volga Bulgars have only 5% of Y line Asian genes is 3% Q 2% haplogroup C3. Volga bulgar woomen line european and not caucasian. сaucasian woomen line as arabian and as jewish
@xDarkNicotine Caucasians is Caucasians White is white. Caucasians and Europeans are completely different groups. Caucasians typical Semites, for exemple North Caucasians are the most pure Semites on earth haplogroup J more than 80%. Volga Bulgars have mostly Finnish haplogroup n1c1, so they can't be turanids. Finns have 60% n1c1 but they look like the Swedes and Norwegians. I say again I am Russian, Im not Volga Bulgs
@xDarkNicotine Tatars anot Turkic in Autosomal DNA, they close to Finno Ugric peoples. Haplogroup K was born in Central Asia is not in south)) and Turkic and Finnic completely different people. Turkic are Mongoloid Finno-Ugric Europid . Finnish gay raped Yakuts they have Finnish blood because Finnish guy raped all Yakut womens but Autosomal DNA Yakuts 100% mongoloids. as well as African Cameroonians have a 90% r1b haplogroup. but genetic Autosomal DNA Cameroonians pure Negroids.
@wolsky25 lol lol lol :)))) tungusic and japanese people have N Y dna :))) im said you finnic people were mongolid .. but they mixed with white womens ..
@xDarkNicotine lol japanese and tungusic people have 1-2% N))) So they have 1-2% R1 so they are europeans??? or cameruns who have 90% R1b are Europeans or kirgizes who have 63% R1a Europeans??? ancient finnic people were nordic for exemple finns and estonains with karels are steal nordic. other finno-ugric mostly baltic/ east finno-ugric mostly lapponid. ugric mostly mongolids. west ugric hungarinas europid.
@xDarkNicotine Y-DNA haplogroups Japanese D-P37.1 (34.7%), O-P31 (31.7%), O-M122 (20.1%), C-M8 (5.4%), C-M217 (3.1%), NO (2.3%) and N (1.5%) 7%?? bashkirs and tatars 17% is high?
Finno-Ugric peoples nothen common with Turkic
Chuvash and Tatars Turanids? You've seen Chuvash and Volga Tatars? I think not) Bashkirs yes Turanids
ancient Turks were like the Indians America they not Europoids.
lol Cumans were turkicized Scythians. 90% Cumans genes similar with Slavic and only 10% Asian
@wolsky25 :))) lol have you ever seen ancient turkic :)))) lol
chuvash people most oldest turkic people .. do you understand ???? i see many volga bolgars and chuvash .. ancient chuvash and bolgar men mixed slavic womens :))) true or not? cumans were turkic kıpcaks eu people called cuman :)))
cuman Y dna like oghuz turks (r1b )
now go read history or shut up :)))))))))))))))))))))))
@xDarkNicotine x aha ha do not make me laugh))) 1 Cumans belonged to haplogroup R1a1 as Slavs not R1b!!!!!!!!!!!!!. because iCumans is Scythians indo-europeans who adopted Turkic language after invasion Huns. Ancient Turks Huns (first turkic tribe) were Mongoloids)), this fact! all Huns skulls in Mongolia were Mongoloid.
@xDarkNicotine I'm talking about first Turkic! im not talking about Mongol -Turkic mixing. first Turkic people Huns were Mongoloid is a fact. all skulls found among Hun graves in south Mongolia, and north China (homeland Turkic peoples) were Mongoloid. Huns first Turkic so they have pure Turkic phenotype! Huns do not mix with the Mongols, Huns is Haplogroup Q Mongols Haplogroup C3. Huns have same genom with American Indians. and one phenotype faces .
@wolsky25 huns were mixed people turkic mongolic slavic iranic only ruler class turkic
first elements of hunnuic state appeared in ordos valley in 1390 b.c while fist time they were mentioned in 1766 b.c huns speak a typicalturkic language probably of oghuric type suprisingly enough huns were not mongolid genetic analysis of 2500 y.o. linzi population
showed that huns resembled modern turks portuguese welsh and icelanders
@xDarkNicotine if be precise the Huns were not complete Mongoloids they were Americanoid race, they were of mixed nation because haplogroup Q was originally Europid + asian mtDNA C and D
@wolsky25 :))) i speak about r1b :))))))) first turkic huns carried r1b and cumans carried r1b not r1a .. you said cumans carried r1a :)) im wait your sources :)))
The principal mystery in the relationship of Indo-European and Türkic linguistic families, and an attempt to solve it with the help of DNA genealogy: reflections of a non-linguist
Journal of Russian Academy of DNA Genealogy (ISSN 1942-7484), 2010, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 3 - 58
@xDarkNicotine I gave you the link. lol Klesov, simply mocks the Western Europeans but it is not so! First Turkic is Huns! All the skeletons Huns belonged to haplogroup Q. haplogroup r1b never been in North China, such as Altai and Khakassia most ancient Turkic today are haplogroup Q
@wolsky25 lol altai and khakassia mostly Y dna R1A NOT Q AND MT DNA
The applied approach permitted identification of 60% of mtDNA types the majority of which had southern Caucasoid origin. Less than 10% of mtDNA types were of eastern European origin. The gene pools of Altaians and Khakassians displayed the presence of autochthonous components represented by mtDNA types from subgroups U2 and U4.
@xDarkNicotine eupedia. com / europe/origins _ haplogroups _ europe. shtml see about r1a1!!! lie altai people are not 58% they are 30-58%! other is haplogroup Q
@wolsky25 fuck off! you jealous idiot trying to make cumans as "indo-european" ! but you know what? they were %100 Turkic with their culture, language, military, etc. ! the only thing that cuman warriors fucked many slav women.
@wolsky25 what is the Turkic you fucking gay? there is not such a word in Turkic languages. the only term is "TÜRK" and how do you know how im looking you pinky fucking gay? im half crimean Tatar and half Turkish(oghuz). jealous bastard, you know that Kypchaks(kumans) are very cool people and now you triyng to show them indo europoean. but no, they were Turks! speak Turkish, have Turkish language! and fought and fucked every slavs in eastern europe. yea they fucked you very hard. :)
@Oyrad58 in Russian keyboard no letter Ü )) Kipchaks were slaves , see history, ))) relex man ))))) you even not look like Turk real turk people is Altai people you more look like arab or gypsie)))
@wolsky25 Kypchak were slaves? Lol you are a jealous troll, Kypchaks were warrior nation in eastern europe and fucked and ruled slavic idiots of there. im not looking like gypsy or arab Turks of Türkei are powerful hybryd of Oghuz Turk nomads and native anatolians(galatians, hittites) etc.
and you know what? your russian girls like Turkish cock so much. here in antalya, we fucked perhaps millions of russian sluts. i swear!
@Oyrad58 Kypchak were slaves Rus))) Rus permanently destroyed Kypchak raids on Polovtsian steppe))) I always thinks that ancestors Turkish is /FV8trqxz2t0 but now i know that is not true thanks for your information)))
Oh shut it will you. The fact that Yusupov was the richest man in your peasant country shows who ruled whom. Whos money do you think hired those french designers to build palaces and mansions in Saint Pete and Kiev because it certainly was no carpet salesmen from Odessa or russian shack peasants near Moscow. Akhmatov has no taken Yusupovs place. Rinat recently bought the most expensive house in UK. Perhaps you heard about that peasant.
@Oyrad58 I'm sorry my friend but in Turkey is Ukrainian womens .... Ukrainian prostitute is great prostitutes )))) for Russians womens Turks very poor )))
You are right. Ukrainians and russians are equally poor but yes turks prefer ukrainians while russians are left to caucasians like georgians and armenians to enjoy wit. Some say those Irinas also love to play with azeris and chechens. It is a huge insult to russian man thus the skinhead gangs.
@xDarkNicotine belonging to DNA determined by the number mutations in different species. all Yakutian haplogroup N, all Cameroonian R1b etc belongs only to 1 mutation. This means that 1 man raped all women. This means that genes were from an ancient ancestor fathers but anthropology from local population.
@xDarkNicotine for example, I will go to African village and fuck black woman, she birth five boys, they marry with black girls, whole village will have European haplogroup r1a or r1b but genetically they will be clean blacks
@xDarkNicotine in words if the Volga Tatars were Turkic, they was look like Mongols. modern Volga Tatars in most cases look like the Finno-Ugric peoples. and do not look like Turkic
@wolsky25 ancient turkic people were not mongolid .. kazaks were turkicized mongols .. turkic people called cuman by eu people it mean is blonde .. onogurs kitrigurs oghuz avars bolgars pecheneks cumans were not mongolid they were turkic people . when mongol ruled central asia then mongols asimilated by turkic kıpcaks and appear uzbeks and kazaks people
@wolsky25 volga bolgars were turkic people .. bolgar = find and mix .. turkic onogurs and kitrugurs mixed in caucasia then they called bolgar by other turkic peoples first bolgars people spoke turkic oghur language like chuvash and ancient khazars .. after their language changed by other muslim turkic people kıpcaks
@xDarkNicotine . haplogroup K is not Mongoloid. haplogroup Q first people with Q have Europoid Skulls but then blended with Asian women and turanid type as Nother Native Americans who look like Euro-mongoloid folk. haplogroup N same situation as and Q mongoloid real only C
@tapanar2 look this video this is karakeçili video from east turkey ..they are speaking turkish and kurdish but they know their turkish origin ;) watch?v=MYm8MLqoCj8
:)) im looking turkic world i see honour ,morality , history , brave people and affection :)) like chuvash gagauz balkars kharacays turkmens azerbiajanis uzbeks uyghurs yörüks qashqais bashkırs volga bolgars :))
@tapanar2 Thank you and god bless you. The turks have hard time tracing their ancestory so they for from their name and expand on that. That is the last resort they go to in order to attract other who buy their chip stories.
Bolgarian, Armenian, and Greek people all share the same enemy and the same difference from turks. We all have distinct ancient histories and can trace it to an ancestory from a specific region.
Вывод: татары это не тюрки, а тюркизированые европеоиды славяне нордической и южной расы, а так же финно-угры и некоторая часть азиатов монголоидов. Турки сосите хуй.
Работы были произведены по программе разработанной Антропологическим институтом, а все измерения были произведены по инструкции, изданной под редакцией В. В. Бунака [17].
Антропологические исследования по небольшой выборке выявили в 1947 году у поволжских татар наличие четырёх основных антропологических типов: понтийского, светлого европеоидного, сублапоноидного, монголоидного[18]. монголоидным типом составила около 8 %, у мишарей — 11 %, а у собственно татар эта доля превышала 19 %
Всего было обследовано 269 татар, у 90 человек выявлен темный европеоидный — понтийский тип (33,5 %), у 74 человек — светлый европеоидный (27,5 %), у 66 человек — сублапоноидный (24,5 %), лишь у 39 человек присутствует монголоидный тип (14,5 %) (Таблица 1). Доля монголоидов различалась у субэтнических групп татар: доля кряшенов с монголоидным типом составила около 8 %, у мишарей — 11 %, а у собственно татар эта доля превышала 19 %
we are all turk peoples ottomans are turkomens etc...but if you want to see the resource of turks,you must look on the ethimologie of turkish language...this is tatar language is the resource of all kind of turkish languages!
as the United Nations says in the subject of tribe tatar that they are real turks and the resource of turkish language is tatar etc...everyone must look on the language resources...tatar language is the real essential of turkish language! ok?
All the people shown in the video are not Tatar! They all mixed with European and Persian. Please do some years of research on the ancient drawing in the whole Asian. Go to Republic of Yakutai, Sakha, Kazakh, Mongol, Korea, Western and Northern China, Eskimo etc to find out the native people.
Again, I am pointing at Tatar, a tribe under the ancient Turkish empire. What I would said is that they carry some kind of image of Tatar, but not all.
Turkish have big influence over Northern Asian, but we are not Turkish even our languages are quite similar. The farthest history we can even traced is from Gobi desert.
Besides, Turkish is pretty much all Muslim now huh?
@glorycontinent lol :))) first tatarstan people were not tatar they were mix of turkic people..bolgars,cumans....etc ancient tatars were not turk they were mongol people .. russian propaganda called tatar but this is not true ;) they were turkic BOLGARS ;) like chuvash
@Askar9992 LOL you are not turk you are mongol :) sorry but this is real :)
look other turkic people and their y dna only your dna same mongols :D haha look your neighbor turkic people turkmens have 37 % r1b 17 % j2 ... uygurs have 22 % r1a 18 % r1b kirghiz have % 63 r1a uzbeks have higher causaian y dna but they mixed with mongols :D only kazaks have 53 % c3 omg lol
@xDarkNicotine most kazakhs have no C3, this wiki results are very funny, first turkic peoples were mongoloids, turkmens are just turkizied indo-europeans, uzbeks are half persians, turkish peoples are turkizied anatolians, greeks, kurds... you even look same
@Askar9992 i dont read wiki .. wiki is not credible .. all the people speak about history and...
i search kazakh people you are muslim mongols.. first turkic people wre not mongols look chinese source they wrote about turks they describe turks had blond hair and colour eyes ..
we dont exclude you but you speak about all the turkic people why? because you know you are mongol ..
@xDarkNicotine first turkic peoples were mongoloids, just take it.... turkish peoples are actually turkizied indo-europeans, uzbeks are mix of karluks & iranic speaking peoples that's why they look like tajiki iranians, turkmens are mix of oguz & local iranic speaking peoples.. so shut up...
turkmens were oghuz turk like azerbaijani turks turkey turks gagauz qashqai ..
uzbeks didnt mix with persians they mixed with mongols ..mongols were enemy turks .. most of turks escaped from mongols so turks went to turkey and azerbaijani and we didnt mix with mongols
turks are very very lighter from greeks and kurds ..lol look their y dna they are diffrent from turks
@xDarkNicotine OK, oguz turkic DNA is R1b? but you turkish people have just 7-11& R1b others are J & other haplogroups... & BTW these Volga tatars are turkizied ugors & bolgars in Middle Ages by Altin Orda warriors
@xDarkNicotine Dude, bolgars were iranic speaking peoples... Volga tatars genetecelly ugors just like chuvashs... we kazakhs have just 25% C3... you sory but there is big differences between turkmens & turkish peoples.. turkmens have 33% R1b & they have mongoloid features... turkish peoples have just maximum 11% R1b...
& xiongnu huns, dinlins carried N, C haplogroups & most of them were mongoloids... sorry but I think you turkish peoples are just turkizied europeans...
@xDarkNicotine don't make me laugh please seljuks came to Anatolia just with few thousands seljuks.. so most of you are just turkizied, ancient turkic may be ruled mongolic & turkic peoples but they were mongoloids-asiatics just like them... Ataturk did linguistic reform you don't know even your own history...
obviously turkic peoples were not mongols but from same origin like mongols, tungus... even ancient turkic & mongolic religion was same - tengrism... one symbol of burn - wolf...
@Askar9992 obviously turkic peoples were not mongols but from same origin like mongols, tungus... even ancient turkic & mongolic religion was same - tengrism... one symbol of burn - wolf... <<< wolf came from scythians
tungusic people y dna mostly O mongolic people y dna mostly C3 turkic people y dna mostly R1
@Askar9992 omg we are turks yes we mix with ancient anatolians yes this is true but mostly turkish poeple origin belong to ancient turkic people .. only 20 % turkish people were turkicised anatolians 80 % people were pure turks
but kazakhs were 70% turkicied mongols
yes everybody know it your are muslim mongol
now look mirror you look turkic people (bolgars azerbijani qashqai chuvash turkmens uzbek uygur balkar gagauz baskırts? or mongols?
@xDarkNicotine now look mirror you look like turkic people (bolgars azerbijani qashqai chuvash turkmens uzbek uygur balkar gagauz baskırts? or mongols?
@xDarkNicotine & just look at tatars, they look same as russians... every 2'nd tatar marry to russians. That's fact... bolgars were never turkic, they are iranic origin, they came from Balkh. chuvash are turkizied ugors....
BUT bashkirs look just like kazakhs... uyghurs have 55% J persian haplogroup, turkmens 35%, balkars are turkizied caucasians just like azeris
@Askar9992 i say again again again you are real idiot :))
chuvash are turkic bolgars like volga tatars they were not iranic chuvash language is old bolgars turkic language from oghur branch .. baskırs have 47 % r1b Y dna but you have not
uygurs have only 12 % J Y dna and J not iranian haplogroup ..idiot
@Askar9992 i say again go suck banana .. i see your are provocateur.. and you dont know anthing about turkic people history and dna . you said ---- so you ottomans were never turk.. you are just indo-europeans... where is you asiatic features? <<<<< OMG hahahahaa OMG OMG LOL zuhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
@Askar9992 omg hahaha turkish people have 9 % asian Y dna --yes you think turkic people came from asian origin <<< but this is only mongol dream << .. you are baboon and only you suck babanas ..bastard mongol
@xDarkNicotine Sbananas in your gypsy turkish ass dumbass...
turkic peoples were asians jsut like mongols, tungus & etc... that's historical fact... Huns, dinlins were all asians... just go & see ancient turkic monuments in Mongolia...
@Askar9992 ust go & see ancient turkic monuments in Mongolia... <<<< yes they look like turanian
..
old turk prince all the time married with monglian or chinese princess.. so their monuments look like turanids not mongolid you have mongol or tungusic brothers ... speak about them .. dont speak about TURKİC PEOPLE
@Askar9992 ancient turkic language mixed with mongolic and tungusic people language but not same .. look numbers these are similiar or not? not similiar .. if you kazakhs were mongolid this is not concern us
80 % turkic people have caucasian Y DNA and face.. only kazahks have higher c3 y dna ...i say again again kazahks were muslim mongol not turk
@xDarkNicotine Dumb becoz most of modern turkic peoples are turkizied nations like azeris, turkish, Volga tatars & etc... obviously turkic language is different from mongolic & tungustic but they have one origin... turkish language is not pure turkic, 30% vocabulary of modern turkish is persian & arabic... 80% of vocabulary of osman/ottoman language was persian, arabic... sorry but you are jsut turkizied indo-european - aryans...
prototurkic peoples like huns, dinlins were mostly mongoloids...
@Askar9992 now my last words to you Turks have a proverb .. söylediklerin karşındakinin anladıgı kadardır.. <<< use google translate for understand haha ;) you will never understand me ,, you are not turk you are muslim mongol..
ottoman language spoke only in the palace .. but people speak turkish .. seljuks turks spoke persian in the palace . but they were not persian .. look ottomans and seljuks turks spoke persian and arabic in the palace .. and you say turks were turkicised ? omg
@Askar9992 hey baboon ,, who turkicisied me ? lol haha .. tungusic language have 60 % chinese words ?
if turkic language and mongolic language have same origin . finnish language and mongolic language have same origin.. because these people gramers are same .. i said you ancien turkic language mixed mongolic language .. many scientist say atlaic language is fake
@xDarkNicotine baboon in your ass childish retard gypsy-turkish... finnish is half indo-european half fin-ugric language... Uralic have nothing to do with altaic... altaic turkic, mongolic, tungustic languages are from same origin... any linguists say it... Sorry if you think turkic peoples were whites you have nothing to do with xiongnu huns which which carried 89% asiatic haplogroups....
@Askar9992 lol :) half indo-eu half ugric << omg hahaa idiot finish language belong to uralic language .. turkish finnish maygar and mongols language are same gramer ...
hunnic peoples were avars bolgars onogur kitigurs itigur kıpcaks cumans oghuz .... these people were not mongolid .. you said bad things aganist all the turkic people so i said bad things aganist for you we dont hate kazaks you are our brothers .. but only you origin belong to mongols but you are still turkic ..
@Askar9992 ottoman was a synthetic language only talked in ottoman palace and its not diffrent from Klingon or esperanto ..anatolian people never spoke ottoman ..they spoke Turkish ..thx
and pls stop arguing over dna hapologroups ,we have never been one race in history.we were clan confederations , people of free will who goes everywhere ,chose their leader according to ciscumstances.Nomads dynamics never fits in sedantaries.Who knows who were my ancestors mongol or Turk unless we time travel?
@kelRapunzel I know there are some turkish id people on youtube speak il about mongolians probably they are of middleastern origin (persian ,arabic ,kurdish) they dont feel themselves close to altay culture ,or islamic-ottoman culture effected by persian arabic propaganda about mongolians they think they are more islam then nationlistic but infact reason is arabs-persians dislike ,brainwashed them. and also ofcourse there are european wannabes.they think being asian is not cool.Silly ofcourse.
@Askar9992 many scientist say west eu people french english spanish people ancient caucasian poeple and they were asimilated from aryan tribes .. because basques and turkic people have higher R1B YDNA
they think basques language was old eu people language and they came from caucasia .. and ancient turkic language origin belong to caucasia and our lanfuage mixed altaic and uralic laguages then turkic people were borning beucase turkic language is very different other atlaic languages
@xDarkNicotine Ok you think that most kazakhs are turkizied mongols... so who are noghays which are descendents of Golden Horde & Noghay Orda? what about karakalpaks? are they turkizied mongolians? lol
@Askar9992 balkars are turkic people they came from cumans(Polovtsians) khazar and turkic bolgars
azeri name russian propaganda their name azerbijani turk
look past 12 centry to 19 century all the time They called themselves as Turks.. now they say haray haray men turkem yep little mngolian kazak bitch you say only you are pure turk but you are not turk YOU ARE MUSLİM MONGOL
@xDarkNicotine balkars' language are from cumans may be, but they are turkizied caucasians just like karachais... they have nothing to do with bolgars, bolgars were iranic origin... turkish peoples are turkizied kurds, persians, arabs, armenians, albaniann & etc... azeris most of them are turkizied...
So if you are turkic why don't you have asiatic-mongoloid features from ancient turkic peoples?
All Turkic Nations are Best
Tengri89 1 month ago
In terms of education yes.
But on the national scale no.
We Turkey Turks are the most developed Turkic nation; having the stronges country (best 17th economy in the world and the strongest 8th army on earth).
giresunstronghold 1 month ago
WE TATAR'S!!!!
RaphaeL1000Kazan 1 month ago
Tatarstan is concidered "the best" because it's one of the most developped of all Turkic nations, (even though it is still part of the Russian Federation) It has high level of education and Industry along with investments from foreign business. The local oil and gas has alot to do with it
Borat911 1 month ago
@Borat911
They suffered because of turkic legacy too. Hitler and Stalin brainwashed both russians and germans to hate them. Fact that several tatars like the jews were very succesesful businesmen also did not help when deal with such people as the teutons or the slavs. USA will how ever protect the world now.
BENNYSIEGEL90 1 month ago
2:11 на Владо Николов брат му.
TranceElevation 2 months ago
To all the tatars here. If these slavic idiots start to vote for the commies again please don't go along with it this time but escape to the West. Remember the 30s and other crimes commited against you by these peasants. They are a jealous bunch. Every sucessful tatar or a jewish person is a synonym to criminal in their peasant eyes. Russia would probaly collapsed if all tatars and jews left.
BENNYSIEGEL90 2 months ago
sen tatar misin
sen beni anliyor musun
altayturan38 2 months ago
shaimiev s dudaevim kenti bili
arslan4620 2 months ago
WHO IS THE MAN AT 1:34? HE LOOKS LIKE A HOLLYWOOD ACTOR.
DeepSetEyesDance 2 months ago
Tatars is the modern name of volgabulgarians. And i didn't understand why you guys think we are turkic people? Bulgarians have nothing to do with the turkiC people!
MrNacko28 3 months ago
@MrNacko28 tatars are turkic people not slavs
Askar9992 2 months ago
@Askar9992 yes tatars are turkic people, but bulgarians arent turkic people!
MrNacko28 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the women look like men...shit
royalarctic 3 months ago
why best turkic nation ??
ibrahimhakan 3 months ago
the Linzi individuals, they seem to be most highly related to Near Easterners (Turks, Iranians(half population turk), and Iraqis(10 % turk), Armenians, and Eastern Europeans (Slavs, Hungarians), although others, such as Catalans and Iraqis, are mixed in. The Icelanders are twelfth on this list. The high placement of the Vietnamese may be an anomaly, error, or some element of ancient genetic history
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
Comment removed
anasbaloch 3 months ago
who are the tatars? onogur? chuvash? bulgar?
PANNONcarpathius 3 months ago
@PANNONcarpathius
modern tatars = mishars(100% ancient tatars from golden horda) + kazan tatars(75% bolgars 25% ancient tatars)
mishars - 1.5milions kazanly - 4.5milions
AHRZAMANBALASY 3 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY
thnx and who were ancient tatars?
PANNONcarpathius 3 months ago
Antique or can be medieval Tatars were the Mongolian tribe
Then they have been won ChingiZhAN and became a part of its army
Their name has extended on all the steppe people in the majority the Turkic
Sory my english
AHRZAMANBALASY 3 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY
no, mongols were others, mongols occupied tatars and after the battle the tatars fought in first line.
tatars spoke a türkic language, but i dont know who were they exactly.
PANNONcarpathius 3 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY are you a turk?
sen bani anayormoson?
alai9100 3 months ago
@alai9100 min mishar
AHRZAMANBALASY 3 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY
We are not MONGOLIAN !!
Learn your fucking history Mongolian bastard !!! Turkic speaking peoples are turks !! Ancient Tatars have Turkicied many Mongolian peoples !!
Today Tatars have about 20-25 million population and MONGOLS 2.5 million !!
YOU ARE NOT TATAR!!!
TatarTuruk 2 weeks ago
@PANNONcarpathius
Ahrzamanbalasy is not a TATAR he is fucking Mongolian !!
We TATARS are in Origin Turks Ancient Tatars too we are not Mongols !! TATAR population is About 20-25 million and Mongols 2-5 million !! Are you stupid too ???
ULU TENGRI (KUDAY) TÖREK XALQINI QORUSUN !!!
TatarTuruk 2 weeks ago
@TatarTuruk
mongols are mongols they have nothing with tatars. tatar races turanid and pamirid mongol races bajkalid and tungusic. who is the stupid?
PANNONcarpathius 1 week ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY
Kazan tatars are 100% bulgars
ruslanshaki 2 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY
modern tatars are the mix of all altaic tribes which invaded Europe (huns, avars, gokturks, khazars, bulgars, kypchaks, mongols etc) + assimilated local europeans (60-70% of the population).
IlshatAh 1 month ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY KAZAN - BULGARIANS 100%
UBIGI 3 weeks ago
@UBIGI
we huns are not from altai but from jungaria .avars had two periods in carpathian basin early avars were hephtalites (568-800), late avars were hun ogurs (hungar) (670-2012)
PANNONcarpathius 1 week ago
@PANNONcarpathius The Tatars are a mongolian type of people. The originals were blond with blue eyes.
Billysrose71 2 months ago
В България познавам много хора които имат същите черти на тези в клипа.
TranceElevation 3 months ago
Tatars's nation is Turkic. TATARLAR TÜRKTÜR. Türkiye'den selamlar
efsanesinmi 3 months ago
Что за трэк играет?
anpy1990 3 months ago
Which "tatar" nation we speak of?
falxdacicus 3 months ago
como es el nombre de la musica me gustaria saberlo
91536172 4 months ago
How the HECK did i get hear? I was watching a video called Monglolian killing muslim!
killacomeback 4 months ago
DASAJEW the best Keeper of the World...I see him 1988 in Germany by the European Championship.....He was the best....Unbelievebal......
pergamonify 4 months ago
There are Volga Bulgarians in Tatarstan, not Turks.
Anatolia is faaaar to the south from Tatarstan and so are the Turks.
tapanar2 4 months ago
@tapanar2 they are turkic volga bolgars .. not bulgarian
and bulgarian people were ancient turkic
xDarkNicotine 4 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Today's Bulgaria is a mix of decendants of Bulgarians and other tribes, but mostly Thracians which have been in Bulgarian lands many thousands of years, and some newcomer ottoman Turks, mostly of Bulgarian ancestors converted to islam many centuries ago. The same happened with some Bulgarians in Tatarstan. It's peoples' choice and right to be whatever they want. I am talking about ancestry, not choices.
tapanar2 4 months ago
@tapanar2 yes presentday bulgaria has nothing with volga bolgar .. you are son thracians and slavs
but ancient bolgars(bulgars) origin belong to turkic onogurs and kitrugurs ..
presentday tatarstan people origin belong to oghur turks like khazars onogurs avars
yes they were turks because turks is common name for turkic world .. but they were not turkish because turkish name about anatolian turks
xDarkNicotine 4 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Thank you for telling me that I have nothing to do with Volga Bulgarians
and who are the ancestors of the Bulgarians. Interesting why they never called themselves
Turks, just Bulgarians. Looks like the Turkic world ;)), have the funny habit to tell what the history and the genesis of other peoples should be. Example, the Annatolia Turks tells the Kurds that in reality they are Turks. Bulgarins in Tatarstan and Bulgaria will remain Bulgarians, no matter what the Turks wish.
tapanar2 4 months ago
@tapanar2 lol :) oor common name is TURK..İm oghuz but eu people called turk ..
pesentday bulgarians people dna has nothing with volga bolgars :)))) volga bolgars dna belong to turkic world ;) im sorry for you :)) kurds were not turk but many kurds origin belong to turk
im from karakeçili clan from kayi tribe from oghuz :)) our symbol was IYI << :))) karakeçili tribe has 672 villaga and 3 city in turkey . 200 krakeçili village people are speaking kurdish in turkey.. but they know their origin
xDarkNicotine 4 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Volga Bulgars are East European origin not Turkic. modern Volga Tatars is a blend of Eastern European and Finno-Ugric peoples. only 10% Kazan Tatars is Turkic origin)).
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 LOL FİNNO UGRİC? lol dumbass go read history and dna kirghiz r1a 63 %
yakuts N 95 %
bashkırs r1b % 47
all the this people were turkic like volga bolgars ..
you read history oke now shut up
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine idiot))) Volga Bulgars have European maternal line, the Bashkir Yakut Kirghiz asian mother line so they are Mongoloids))
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 dumbass i know volga bolgars people mt dna belong to caucasian people ..
i say all the time volga bolgars history language and dna common with other turkic people..
you have K + N + Q +C These are mongolid Y dna .. not turkic your Y dna more mongolid than kırghizs and bashkırs
bolgars were turkic people
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine firstly I am not Volga Bulgrs im Russian I! Further, the Volga Bulgars have only 5% of Y line Asian genes is 3% Q 2% haplogroup C3. Volga bulgar woomen line european and not caucasian. сaucasian woomen line as arabian and as jewish
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 lol :))) caucasian mean white :))) arabs and jewish people were semitic
i said you N + K + Q + C are mongolid Y dna
only N 23 % İN TATARSTAN
it mean is they were turanid
volga bolgars mt dna mostly H and U like anatolian turks
mongolid Y dna is 9 % in turkey 10 % in turkmenistan
volga bolgars were more turanid than anatolian turks
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Caucasians is Caucasians White is white. Caucasians and Europeans are completely different groups. Caucasians typical Semites, for exemple North Caucasians are the most pure Semites on earth haplogroup J more than 80%. Volga Bulgars have mostly Finnish haplogroup n1c1, so they can't be turanids. Finns have 60% n1c1 but they look like the Swedes and Norwegians. I say again I am Russian, Im not Volga Bulgs
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 Haplogroup K origin belong to south asia In Filipinos=45%., in Micronesians from Kapingamarangi=67% )
Haplogroup N1c reaches a maximum frequency of approximately 90% among the sakhas and sakha people were pure mongolid :)
finnish language and turkic language have same grammer .. finnish people have turkic roots
ancient caucasian people mixed with semitic people but they were not semitic
Haplogroup J origin belong to south west asia (yemen 76 % )(saudi 64 %)
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Tatars anot Turkic in Autosomal DNA, they close to Finno Ugric peoples. Haplogroup K was born in Central Asia is not in south)) and Turkic and Finnic completely different people. Turkic are Mongoloid Finno-Ugric Europid . Finnish gay raped Yakuts they have Finnish blood because Finnish guy raped all Yakut womens but Autosomal DNA Yakuts 100% mongoloids. as well as African Cameroonians have a 90% r1b haplogroup. but genetic Autosomal DNA Cameroonians pure Negroids.
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 lol lol lol :)))) tungusic and japanese people have N Y dna :))) im said you finnic people were mongolid .. but they mixed with white womens ..
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine lol japanese and tungusic people have 1-2% N))) So they have 1-2% R1 so they are europeans??? or cameruns who have 90% R1b are Europeans or kirgizes who have 63% R1a Europeans??? ancient finnic people were nordic for exemple finns and estonains with karels are steal nordic. other finno-ugric mostly baltic/ east finno-ugric mostly lapponid. ugric mostly mongolids. west ugric hungarinas europid.
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 LOL :)))))))))))))))))))))))))) JAPANESE PEOPLE HAVE 7 % N Y DNA NOT 1- 2 %
CHUVASH BOLGARS BASHKIRS YAKUTS WERE TURKİC AND THEY HAVE HİGGER N Y DNA ..
AND MONGOLİC PEOPLE BURYATS AND EVENKS HAVE HİGGER N Y DNA :))
FİNNO UGRİC PEOPLE WERE MONGOLİD NOT NORDİC .. THEİR LANGUAGE GRAMMER SAME WİTH ATLAİC FAMİLY
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Y-DNA haplogroups Japanese D-P37.1 (34.7%), O-P31 (31.7%), O-M122 (20.1%), C-M8 (5.4%), C-M217 (3.1%), NO (2.3%) and N (1.5%) 7%?? bashkirs and tatars 17% is high?
Finno-Ugric peoples nothen common with Turkic
Chuvash and Tatars Turanids? You've seen Chuvash and Volga Tatars? I think not) Bashkirs yes Turanids
ancient Turks were like the Indians America they not Europoids.
lol Cumans were turkicized Scythians. 90% Cumans genes similar with Slavic and only 10% Asian
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 :))) lol have you ever seen ancient turkic :)))) lol
chuvash people most oldest turkic people .. do you understand ???? i see many volga bolgars and chuvash .. ancient chuvash and bolgar men mixed slavic womens :))) true or not? cumans were turkic kıpcaks eu people called cuman :)))
cuman Y dna like oghuz turks (r1b )
now go read history or shut up :)))))))))))))))))))))))
N MONGOLİD Y DNA
AND ANCİENT FİNNO UGRİC PEOPLE WERE MONGOLİD
CHUVASH AND VOLGA BOLGARS WERE TURKİC
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine x aha ha do not make me laugh))) 1 Cumans belonged to haplogroup R1a1 as Slavs not R1b!!!!!!!!!!!!!. because iCumans is Scythians indo-europeans who adopted Turkic language after invasion Huns. Ancient Turks Huns (first turkic tribe) were Mongoloids)), this fact! all Huns skulls in Mongolia were Mongoloid.
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 :))))))))) 1 Cumans belonged to haplogroup R1a1 as Slavs not R1b :) where is your sources :)))) im wait
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine eupedia. com / europe/origins _ haplogroups _ europe. shtml
wolsky25 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine I'm talking about first Turkic! im not talking about Mongol -Turkic mixing. first Turkic people Huns were Mongoloid is a fact. all skulls found among Hun graves in south Mongolia, and north China (homeland Turkic peoples) were Mongoloid. Huns first Turkic so they have pure Turkic phenotype! Huns do not mix with the Mongols, Huns is Haplogroup Q Mongols Haplogroup C3. Huns have same genom with American Indians. and one phenotype faces .
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 huns were mixed people turkic mongolic slavic iranic only ruler class turkic
first elements of hunnuic state appeared in ordos valley in 1390 b.c while fist time they were mentioned in 1766 b.c huns speak a typicalturkic language probably of oghuric type suprisingly enough huns were not mongolid genetic analysis of 2500 y.o. linzi population
showed that huns resembled modern turks portuguese welsh and icelanders
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine if be precise the Huns were not complete Mongoloids they were Americanoid race, they were of mixed nation because haplogroup Q was originally Europid + asian mtDNA C and D
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 :))) i speak about r1b :))))))) first turkic huns carried r1b and cumans carried r1b not r1a .. you said cumans carried r1a :)) im wait your sources :)))
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@wolsky25 READ İT Overview of Türkic genetics
Anatole A. Klyosov
The principal mystery in the relationship of Indo-European and Türkic linguistic families, and an attempt to solve it with the help of DNA genealogy: reflections of a non-linguist
Journal of Russian Academy of DNA Genealogy (ISSN 1942-7484), 2010, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 3 - 58
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine I gave you the link. lol Klesov, simply mocks the Western Europeans but it is not so! First Turkic is Huns! All the skeletons Huns belonged to haplogroup Q. haplogroup r1b never been in North China, such as Altai and Khakassia most ancient Turkic today are haplogroup Q
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 lol altai and khakassia mostly Y dna R1A NOT Q AND MT DNA
The applied approach permitted identification of 60% of mtDNA types the majority of which had southern Caucasoid origin. Less than 10% of mtDNA types were of eastern European origin. The gene pools of Altaians and Khakassians displayed the presence of autochthonous components represented by mtDNA types from subgroups U2 and U4.
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@wolsky25 :)) WHERE İS YOUR İNFORMATİON ?? altai people Y DNA 58 % R1A :)) 15 % Q ?
??? LOL
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xDarkNicotine eupedia. com / europe/origins _ haplogroups _ europe. shtml see about r1a1!!! lie altai people are not 58% they are 30-58%! other is haplogroup Q
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 fuck off! you jealous idiot trying to make cumans as "indo-european" ! but you know what? they were %100 Turkic with their culture, language, military, etc. ! the only thing that cuman warriors fucked many slav women.
Oyrad58 2 months ago
@Oyrad58 crazy man and 100% nonsense)) you even not look like turkic you look like gypsie
wolsky25 2 months ago
@wolsky25 what is the Turkic you fucking gay? there is not such a word in Turkic languages. the only term is "TÜRK" and how do you know how im looking you pinky fucking gay? im half crimean Tatar and half Turkish(oghuz). jealous bastard, you know that Kypchaks(kumans) are very cool people and now you triyng to show them indo europoean. but no, they were Turks! speak Turkish, have Turkish language! and fought and fucked every slavs in eastern europe. yea they fucked you very hard. :)
Oyrad58 2 months ago
@Oyrad58 in Russian keyboard no letter Ü )) Kipchaks were slaves , see history, ))) relex man ))))) you even not look like Turk real turk people is Altai people you more look like arab or gypsie)))
wolsky25 2 months ago
@wolsky25 Kypchak were slaves? Lol you are a jealous troll, Kypchaks were warrior nation in eastern europe and fucked and ruled slavic idiots of there. im not looking like gypsy or arab Turks of Türkei are powerful hybryd of Oghuz Turk nomads and native anatolians(galatians, hittites) etc.
and you know what? your russian girls like Turkish cock so much. here in antalya, we fucked perhaps millions of russian sluts. i swear!
Oyrad58 2 months ago
@Oyrad58 Kypchak were slaves Rus))) Rus permanently destroyed Kypchak raids on Polovtsian steppe))) I always thinks that ancestors Turkish is /FV8trqxz2t0 but now i know that is not true thanks for your information)))
wolsky25 2 months ago
@wolsky25
Oh shut it will you. The fact that Yusupov was the richest man in your peasant country shows who ruled whom. Whos money do you think hired those french designers to build palaces and mansions in Saint Pete and Kiev because it certainly was no carpet salesmen from Odessa or russian shack peasants near Moscow. Akhmatov has no taken Yusupovs place. Rinat recently bought the most expensive house in UK. Perhaps you heard about that peasant.
BENNYSIEGEL90 2 months ago
@Oyrad58 I'm sorry my friend but in Turkey is Ukrainian womens .... Ukrainian prostitute is great prostitutes )))) for Russians womens Turks very poor )))
wolsky25 2 months ago
@wolsky25
You are right. Ukrainians and russians are equally poor but yes turks prefer ukrainians while russians are left to caucasians like georgians and armenians to enjoy wit. Some say those Irinas also love to play with azeris and chechens. It is a huge insult to russian man thus the skinhead gangs.
BENNYSIEGEL90 2 months ago
@xDarkNicotine belonging to DNA determined by the number mutations in different species. all Yakutian haplogroup N, all Cameroonian R1b etc belongs only to 1 mutation. This means that 1 man raped all women. This means that genes were from an ancient ancestor fathers but anthropology from local population.
wolsky25 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine for example, I will go to African village and fuck black woman, she birth five boys, they marry with black girls, whole village will have European haplogroup r1a or r1b but genetically they will be clean blacks
wolsky25 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine in words if the Volga Tatars were Turkic, they was look like Mongols. modern Volga Tatars in most cases look like the Finno-Ugric peoples. and do not look like Turkic
wolsky25 3 months ago
@wolsky25 :)) first ancient tatar poeple were mongolic poeple not turkic .. second bolgar people were turkic
present day volga bolgars or bulgars called tatar by russians .. but they were not tatar they were turkic bolgars
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@wolsky25 ancient turkic people were not mongolid .. kazaks were turkicized mongols .. turkic people called cuman by eu people it mean is blonde .. onogurs kitrigurs oghuz avars bolgars pecheneks cumans were not mongolid they were turkic people . when mongol ruled central asia then mongols asimilated by turkic kıpcaks and appear uzbeks and kazaks people
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@wolsky25 volga bolgars were turkic people .. bolgar = find and mix .. turkic onogurs and kitrugurs mixed in caucasia then they called bolgar by other turkic peoples first bolgars people spoke turkic oghur language like chuvash and ancient khazars .. after their language changed by other muslim turkic people kıpcaks
xDarkNicotine 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine . haplogroup K is not Mongoloid. haplogroup Q first people with Q have Europoid Skulls but then blended with Asian women and turanid type as Nother Native Americans who look like Euro-mongoloid folk. haplogroup N same situation as and Q mongoloid real only C
wolsky25 3 months ago
@xDarkNicotine I'm sorry I not correctly understood you ))
wolsky25 3 months ago
@tapanar2 look this video this is karakeçili video from east turkey ..they are speaking turkish and kurdish but they know their turkish origin ;) watch?v=MYm8MLqoCj8
:)) im looking turkic world i see honour ,morality , history , brave people and affection :)) like chuvash gagauz balkars kharacays turkmens azerbiajanis uzbeks uyghurs yörüks qashqais bashkırs volga bolgars :))
xDarkNicotine 4 months ago
@tapanar2 Thank you and god bless you. The turks have hard time tracing their ancestory so they for from their name and expand on that. That is the last resort they go to in order to attract other who buy their chip stories.
Bolgarian, Armenian, and Greek people all share the same enemy and the same difference from turks. We all have distinct ancient histories and can trace it to an ancestory from a specific region.
livingdream1234 4 months ago
oghur and oghuz were two largest branch .. but oghur branch was died only chuvash language were living now
but oghuz language language keep live not died
120 milion people speak oghuz language branch (turkmens turks azerbaijanis qashqaies )
xDarkNicotine 4 months ago
my grandfather is a turk-tatar and me too :D
Hattiiieeee 4 months ago
brothers dont get me wrong but todays world has no pure races so why do u keep saying this race or that race bla bla ..
ccckalmahccc 4 months ago
То турците в Турция не са турци, вие ми говорите за Туркестан!
Политика, открай време, жестока и отвратителна!
hamanbair 4 months ago
@hamanbair KVO ZAES TI BE ZA TURCITE I DRUGITE TURSKI NACII, AYDE EBI SE V GAZA...GYAUR MRASEN!
Balckshade 4 months ago
TURAN ..... cCc ,
PrensHaru 5 months ago
I'm tatar turk.
and i living in Turkey.
LONG LIVE TURKIC NATIONS we are brother we are one !
PrensHaru 5 months ago
tar tar is a funny name XD
Im12AndWhatIsDis 5 months ago
Вывод: татары это не тюрки, а тюркизированые европеоиды славяне нордической и южной расы, а так же финно-угры и некоторая часть азиатов монголоидов. Турки сосите хуй.
molot25 5 months ago
Работы были произведены по программе разработанной Антропологическим институтом, а все измерения были произведены по инструкции, изданной под редакцией В. В. Бунака [17].
Антропологические исследования по небольшой выборке выявили в 1947 году у поволжских татар наличие четырёх основных антропологических типов: понтийского, светлого европеоидного, сублапоноидного, монголоидного[18]. монголоидным типом составила около 8 %, у мишарей — 11 %, а у собственно татар эта доля превышала 19 %
molot25 5 months ago
Всего было обследовано 269 татар, у 90 человек выявлен темный европеоидный — понтийский тип (33,5 %), у 74 человек — светлый европеоидный (27,5 %), у 66 человек — сублапоноидный (24,5 %), лишь у 39 человек присутствует монголоидный тип (14,5 %) (Таблица 1). Доля монголоидов различалась у субэтнических групп татар: доля кряшенов с монголоидным типом составила около 8 %, у мишарей — 11 %, а у собственно татар эта доля превышала 19 %
molot25 5 months ago
Турки сосите хуй
Turks suck dick
Татары это северные европейцы и больше трети из них принадлежат нордической расе с арийской гаплогруппой R1a
Tatars are northern Europeans and more than a third of them have a Nordic race with Aryan haplogroup R1a
наличие сибирской гаплогруппы (Q) + монгольскй (C) = 2,4%
скандинавской (северо-западной) гаплогруппы (I ) = 4%
кельтской (западноевропейской) гаплогруппы (R1b) = 8,7%
финно-угорских гаплогрупп (N1+N2) = 23.1%
арийской гаплогруппы (R1a1) = 34,1%
molot25 5 months ago
nobody cant lie about tatars origine,they are real turks as United Nations says in the subject of 'tribes' on the tatar article...
atibull 5 months ago
we are all turk peoples ottomans are turkomens etc...but if you want to see the resource of turks,you must look on the ethimologie of turkish language...this is tatar language is the resource of all kind of turkish languages!
atibull 5 months ago
as the United Nations says in the subject of tribe tatar that they are real turks and the resource of turkish language is tatar etc...everyone must look on the language resources...tatar language is the real essential of turkish language! ok?
atibull 5 months ago
as the United Nations says in the subject of tribe tatar that they are real turks and the resource of turkish language is tatar etc...
atibull 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine 80% turks? don't make me laugh please you have just 11% R1b oguz genetic... most of modern Turkey are just turkizied anatolians
Askar9992 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine 1) hmm most kazakhs have little bit C3 but not much, maximum 25-30%,
2) bolgars were never turkic, they came from Balkh, Afghanistan... Turkic peoples came from Mongolia, East Russia, Atai...
3) Kipcak haplogroup is R1b & little bit N...most kipcak tribe of kazakhs share this haplogroup...
4) uzbeks have just maximum 15% C3... but they have much more local iranic-transaxonian blood...
5) ancient turkic monuments in Mongolia & Altai are all mongoloids...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 1- kazahks were muslim mongols they learn islam from turks so you are turkefied mongol
2- turkic people were nomadic people so turkic people were living all the time different region
3- bolgars didnt came from balk or afganistan they came from central asia
4-kıpcak haplogroup is R1A and N. kazahks were turkicised mongols (70%)
5-uzbeks were mix with mongols atchagatai time
6- ancient turkic monuments were not mongolid they look like turanids watch?v=ZGxdr9NjBz4 <<
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Balkh is Central Asia, you are ignorant dumb... most kazakhs' tribes are from turkic origin...
kipcaks never had R1a, their haplgoroup was R1b & N, kipcaks belongs to history of Kazakhstan & Russia..
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 balk is khorasan .. baboon
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
All the people shown in the video are not Tatar! They all mixed with European and Persian. Please do some years of research on the ancient drawing in the whole Asian. Go to Republic of Yakutai, Sakha, Kazakh, Mongol, Korea, Western and Northern China, Eskimo etc to find out the native people.
glorycontinent 6 months ago
@glorycontinent lol nonsense we have nothing with korea and mongols and eskimos
we are turkic people and kazaks was turkefiled mongols .. go search
where are you from? who were mix persians? lol they were hindu nation lol
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine
Again, I am pointing at Tatar, a tribe under the ancient Turkish empire. What I would said is that they carry some kind of image of Tatar, but not all.
Turkish have big influence over Northern Asian, but we are not Turkish even our languages are quite similar. The farthest history we can even traced is from Gobi desert.
Besides, Turkish is pretty much all Muslim now huh?
glorycontinent 5 months ago
@glorycontinent lol :))) first tatarstan people were not tatar they were mix of turkic people..bolgars,cumans....etc ancient tatars were not turk they were mongol people .. russian propaganda called tatar but this is not true ;) they were turkic BOLGARS ;) like chuvash
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine modern tatars = mishars(100% ancient tatars) + kazan tatars(75% bolgars 25% ancient tatars)
mishars - 1.5milions kazanly - 4.5milions
mostly famouse tatars ae mishars
AHRZAMANBALASY 5 months ago
@AHRZAMANBALASY thanx bro
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine kazakhs are not turkified mongols, it's turkish peoples are turkizied anatolians
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 LOL you are not turk you are mongol :) sorry but this is real :)
look other turkic people and their y dna only your dna same mongols :D haha look your neighbor turkic people turkmens have 37 % r1b 17 % j2 ... uygurs have 22 % r1a 18 % r1b kirghiz have % 63 r1a uzbeks have higher causaian y dna but they mixed with mongols :D only kazaks have 53 % c3 omg lol
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine most kazakhs have no C3, this wiki results are very funny, first turkic peoples were mongoloids, turkmens are just turkizied indo-europeans, uzbeks are half persians, turkish peoples are turkizied anatolians, greeks, kurds... you even look same
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 i dont read wiki .. wiki is not credible .. all the people speak about history and...
i search kazakh people you are muslim mongols.. first turkic people wre not mongols look chinese source they wrote about turks they describe turks had blond hair and colour eyes ..
we dont exclude you but you speak about all the turkic people why? because you know you are mongol ..
I'm laughing .. lol
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine first turkic peoples were mongoloids, just take it.... turkish peoples are actually turkizied indo-europeans, uzbeks are mix of karluks & iranic speaking peoples that's why they look like tajiki iranians, turkmens are mix of oguz & local iranic speaking peoples.. so shut up...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 you say only you are pure turkic :) with your 53 % c3 hahahaha :D shut up mongol
kıpcak group y dna mostly r1a and N oghuz group y dna mostly R1B J2 AND G ..
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
turkmens were oghuz turk like azerbaijani turks turkey turks gagauz qashqai ..
uzbeks didnt mix with persians they mixed with mongols ..mongols were enemy turks .. most of turks escaped from mongols so turks went to turkey and azerbaijani and we didnt mix with mongols
turks are very very lighter from greeks and kurds ..lol look their y dna they are diffrent from turks
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine OK, oguz turkic DNA is R1b? but you turkish people have just 7-11& R1b others are J & other haplogroups... & BTW these Volga tatars are turkizied ugors & bolgars in Middle Ages by Altin Orda warriors
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 lol turkish people Y dna from igenea
G - 28 % R1B - 21 % J2 - 16 % R1A - 9 % N - 6 % lol :)hahaha
these Volga tatars are turkizied ugors & bolgars in Middle Ages by Altin Orda warriors <<< omg hahaha
idiot first bolgars were turkic people second altın orda warriors were not turks they were mongol like you
idiot
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Dude, bolgars were iranic speaking peoples... Volga tatars genetecelly ugors just like chuvashs... we kazakhs have just 25% C3... you sory but there is big differences between turkmens & turkish peoples.. turkmens have 33% R1b & they have mongoloid features... turkish peoples have just maximum 11% R1b...
& xiongnu huns, dinlins carried N, C haplogroups & most of them were mongoloids... sorry but I think you turkish peoples are just turkizied europeans...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 how old are you? 9- 10? haha
bolgars were turkic people and they were speaking TURKİC language from oghur branch bolgars is turkic word..
volga tatars are volga bolgars this russian propaganda called tatar like but they were turkic bolgars
it is like azerbaijani turks russian propaganda called azeri but they were not azeri they azer azerbijani turks ..
and uzbeks have 25 %C3 and mongols have 54 % c3 kazaks have 53 % uzbeks mixed with mongols but you are muslim mongols
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xDarkNicotine volga tatars are volga bolgars this russian propaganda called tatar but they were turkic bolgars
it is like azerbaijani turks russian propaganda called azeri but they were not azeri they are azerbijani turks
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine 6) ancient turkic peoples were asians even turkic relate to mongolic & tungustic languages... Any linguist can prove it
7) ancient turkic, mongolic & hunnic religion was same...
8) turkish language was not turkic till Ataturk made language reform in Turkey
So sorry but I think you are turkizied anatolian, armenian, persian, arab, albanian or something
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 omg :) haha
7- ancient turkic people ruled asian peoles mongolic and tungustic people
8- ancient turkic people were not same mongols only we lived same region with enmity
9- turkish language was not turkic till Ataturk made language reform in Turkey <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< omg i dont answer it .. you are idiot
10- if we are turkicised anatlions why we are lighter skin from armenians kurds greeks arab and persians
why 40 milions yörüks living in anatolia.(ancient nomadic turkic people)
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine don't make me laugh please seljuks came to Anatolia just with few thousands seljuks.. so most of you are just turkizied, ancient turkic may be ruled mongolic & turkic peoples but they were mongoloids-asiatics just like them... Ataturk did linguistic reform you don't know even your own history...
obviously turkic peoples were not mongols but from same origin like mongols, tungus... even ancient turkic & mongolic religion was same - tengrism... one symbol of burn - wolf...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 obviously turkic peoples were not mongols but from same origin like mongols, tungus... even ancient turkic & mongolic religion was same - tengrism... one symbol of burn - wolf... <<< wolf came from scythians
tungusic people y dna mostly O mongolic people y dna mostly C3 turkic people y dna mostly R1
oke keep see daydream haha
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@Askar9992 omg we are turks yes we mix with ancient anatolians yes this is true but mostly turkish poeple origin belong to ancient turkic people .. only 20 % turkish people were turkicised anatolians 80 % people were pure turks
but kazakhs were 70% turkicied mongols
yes everybody know it your are muslim mongol
now look mirror you look turkic people (bolgars azerbijani qashqai chuvash turkmens uzbek uygur balkar gagauz baskırts? or mongols?
:D
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine now look mirror you look like turkic people (bolgars azerbijani qashqai chuvash turkmens uzbek uygur balkar gagauz baskırts? or mongols?
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine & just look at tatars, they look same as russians... every 2'nd tatar marry to russians. That's fact... bolgars were never turkic, they are iranic origin, they came from Balkh. chuvash are turkizied ugors....
BUT bashkirs look just like kazakhs... uyghurs have 55% J persian haplogroup, turkmens 35%, balkars are turkizied caucasians just like azeris
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 i say again again again you are real idiot :))
chuvash are turkic bolgars like volga tatars they were not iranic chuvash language is old bolgars turkic language from oghur branch .. baskırs have 47 % r1b Y dna but you have not
uygurs have only 12 % J Y dna and J not iranian haplogroup ..idiot
turkmens have 17 % J but they have 37 % r1b
anatolians turks have 21 % r1b 16 % j2
kazahks have 6 % r1b :))) omg lol
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine chuvashs' genbetic is pure finnish, We have a lot R1b - 15-20%...
Uyghurs have 45-50% J
Turkmens have 35% J
turkish peoples have much more J2 & J & you know it...
Askar9992 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Askar9992 i say again go suck banana .. i see your are provocateur.. and you dont know anthing about turkic people history and dna . you said ---- so you ottomans were never turk.. you are just indo-europeans... where is you asiatic features? <<<<< OMG hahahahaa OMG OMG LOL zuhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine modern turkish peoples have just 9% of their ancentral DNA... it's true.. & search more about uyghurs' DNA
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 omg hahaha turkish people have 9 % asian Y dna --yes you think turkic people came from asian origin <<< but this is only mongol dream << .. you are baboon and only you suck babanas ..bastard mongol
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Sbananas in your gypsy turkish ass dumbass...
turkic peoples were asians jsut like mongols, tungus & etc... that's historical fact... Huns, dinlins were all asians... just go & see ancient turkic monuments in Mongolia...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 ust go & see ancient turkic monuments in Mongolia... <<<< yes they look like turanian
..
old turk prince all the time married with monglian or chinese princess.. so their monuments look like turanids not mongolid you have mongol or tungusic brothers ... speak about them .. dont speak about TURKİC PEOPLE
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@Askar9992 hey mongol baboon i buy banana for you suck banana and say thnx your lord :D
turkic people came from atlaic and ural mountains .. TURKİC PEOPLE have 200 milion population
our language different from your east asians brothers (tungusic koreans )
mostly scientist say R1B y dna belong to turkic people ..and this dna is caucasian Y DNA not mongolid
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine turkic peoples are originally from Altai mountains not Ural
turkic languages relate to mongolic, tungustic languages, only childish retards like you dispute it...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 ancient turkic language mixed with mongolic and tungusic people language but not same .. look numbers these are similiar or not? not similiar .. if you kazakhs were mongolid this is not concern us
80 % turkic people have caucasian Y DNA and face.. only kazahks have higher c3 y dna ...i say again again kazahks were muslim mongol not turk
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Dumb becoz most of modern turkic peoples are turkizied nations like azeris, turkish, Volga tatars & etc... obviously turkic language is different from mongolic & tungustic but they have one origin... turkish language is not pure turkic, 30% vocabulary of modern turkish is persian & arabic... 80% of vocabulary of osman/ottoman language was persian, arabic... sorry but you are jsut turkizied indo-european - aryans...
prototurkic peoples like huns, dinlins were mostly mongoloids...
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 now my last words to you Turks have a proverb .. söylediklerin karşındakinin anladıgı kadardır.. <<< use google translate for understand haha ;) you will never understand me ,, you are not turk you are muslim mongol..
ottoman language spoke only in the palace .. but people speak turkish .. seljuks turks spoke persian in the palace . but they were not persian .. look ottomans and seljuks turks spoke persian and arabic in the palace .. and you say turks were turkicised ? omg
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@Askar9992 hey baboon ,, who turkicisied me ? lol haha .. tungusic language have 60 % chinese words ?
if turkic language and mongolic language have same origin . finnish language and mongolic language have same origin.. because these people gramers are same .. i said you ancien turkic language mixed mongolic language .. many scientist say atlaic language is fake
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine baboon in your ass childish retard gypsy-turkish... finnish is half indo-european half fin-ugric language... Uralic have nothing to do with altaic... altaic turkic, mongolic, tungustic languages are from same origin... any linguists say it... Sorry if you think turkic peoples were whites you have nothing to do with xiongnu huns which which carried 89% asiatic haplogroups....
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 lol :) half indo-eu half ugric << omg hahaa idiot finish language belong to uralic language .. turkish finnish maygar and mongols language are same gramer ...
hunnic peoples were avars bolgars onogur kitigurs itigur kıpcaks cumans oghuz .... these people were not mongolid .. you said bad things aganist all the turkic people so i said bad things aganist for you we dont hate kazaks you are our brothers .. but only you origin belong to mongols but you are still turkic ..
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine & BTW we also share 15-20% chinese, 5% korean, 20% D - native amercian haplogroups.. so we are not alone in this world
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 turkic and mongolic people lived same region but different ancestry with enmity
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@Askar9992 ottoman was a synthetic language only talked in ottoman palace and its not diffrent from Klingon or esperanto ..anatolian people never spoke ottoman ..they spoke Turkish ..thx
and pls stop arguing over dna hapologroups ,we have never been one race in history.we were clan confederations , people of free will who goes everywhere ,chose their leader according to ciscumstances.Nomads dynamics never fits in sedantaries.Who knows who were my ancestors mongol or Turk unless we time travel?
kelRapunzel 5 months ago
@kelRapunzel I know there are some turkish id people on youtube speak il about mongolians probably they are of middleastern origin (persian ,arabic ,kurdish) they dont feel themselves close to altay culture ,or islamic-ottoman culture effected by persian arabic propaganda about mongolians they think they are more islam then nationlistic but infact reason is arabs-persians dislike ,brainwashed them. and also ofcourse there are european wannabes.they think being asian is not cool.Silly ofcourse.
kelRapunzel 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine R1b is spanish, french & Western European haplogroup. So how it can be turkic?
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 many scientist say west eu people french english spanish people ancient caucasian poeple and they were asimilated from aryan tribes .. because basques and turkic people have higher R1B YDNA
they think basques language was old eu people language and they came from caucasia .. and ancient turkic language origin belong to caucasia and our lanfuage mixed altaic and uralic laguages then turkic people were borning beucase turkic language is very different other atlaic languages
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Ok you think that most kazakhs are turkizied mongols... so who are noghays which are descendents of Golden Horde & Noghay Orda? what about karakalpaks? are they turkizied mongolians? lol
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 karakalpaks mixed people turkic and mongol .. noghays origin belong to mongols but they were mix
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine if so turkic peoples never believed into shamanic Tengri... Genghiz Khan's mongols believed to tengri
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 tengri is turkic religon
mongolic religion is shamanism
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine Tengrism is shamanism... & mongols believed in tengri... Search or read more about ancient mongolian religion
Askar9992 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Askar9992 Tengrism is shamanism... << lol :))) hahaaa
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@Askar9992 i sent website bro please read it
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine so kazakh-noghay-karakalpak family is turkic with mongolian origin
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 but you are right we have nothing to do with gypsy turkish & tukrmens.. they are avrey black & look like niggas
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 balkars are turkic people they came from cumans(Polovtsians) khazar and turkic bolgars
azeri name russian propaganda their name azerbijani turk
look past 12 centry to 19 century all the time They called themselves as Turks.. now they say haray haray men turkem yep little mngolian kazak bitch you say only you are pure turk but you are not turk YOU ARE MUSLİM MONGOL
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine balkars' language are from cumans may be, but they are turkizied caucasians just like karachais... they have nothing to do with bolgars, bolgars were iranic origin... turkish peoples are turkizied kurds, persians, arabs, armenians, albaniann & etc... azeris most of them are turkizied...
So if you are turkic why don't you have asiatic-mongoloid features from ancient turkic peoples?
Askar9992 5 months ago
@Askar9992 1- ancient turkic people have not asiatic mongolid features .. ( only you are mongol zuhaha )
2- you are enemy of turkic people.. i see each video you write aganist turkic people.. what is your problem ?
We're not responsible for your slant eyes ...
3-baboon , do you know mean cuman? cu << blond man << man .. blond man ..dont look like you kazakh mongolian bastard
4- now go play super mario or captan america ..fool child
xDarkNicotine 5 months ago
@xDarkNicotine 1) Ancient turkic peoples were mongoloids - it's proven fact
2) I am not enemy
3) cumans were not whites at all
4)
Askar9992 5 months ago