Added: 7 months ago
From: smilzorg
Views: 718
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Seems pretty smooth, what specs do you have on your computer?

  • @alt9001 Not all that good by today's standards, but still serves me well: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, NVIDIA 8800GTS 512, 4GB RAM :)

  • @smilzorg That's cool, so how high fps do you get without recording? Seems like it might actually be faster than the official Minecraft.

  • @alt9001 still not that very high, I think it was around 20-30fps, so not exactly playable. It does get 60fps with fewer polygons (1-2 million, which other videos might show more clearly). Apart from reducing poly count, it might run faster with more video ram (at extremes) and fewer draw calls (atm at least one per chunk). I think it might have the potential of rendering faster, because it uses Vertex Buffer Objects, which Minecraft doesn't for legacy / compatibility reasons afaik.

  • @smilzorg I see, and since you're not using fog that might speed things up a bit as well. It's mostly the no fog bit that caught my attention.

  • @alt9001 well, using fog doesn't really make it faster, but it does allow you to shorten the view distance and still make it look okay. This older video I did takes it to the extreme and uses adaptive fog distance based on the currently closest unloaded chunk, so you practically never see "pop-in", just foggier atmosphere: /watch?v=PyzIQc4MfK8 :)

  • Sweet, will be trying this out later.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more