Added: 2 years ago
From: rx3wag
Views: 244,374
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (467)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • screw the gas ths monsta runs jetfuel im sure its nuts in person

  • what mazda should do is they should put a 4 rotor like this into a really light 4wd supercar. it would be nuts. and why you may ask 4wd? well lets just say the tourque of 26b is immence so it would need all 4 wheels to keep it from loosing traction.

  • What an awful sound ... they get more than 500hp on a rotary engine, who said that it's a dead-end technology ? The only thing i would like to know is the reliability of these engine compared to the others Formula Drift cars engines (i don't thay it's not reliable, i just want to know)

  • @TheTartopum76 I don't think a properly prepared rotary will be any less reliable than a piston engine. To be honest, seeing that it has less moving parts, it's possible that it'll be more reliable. It won the 24 hours of Le Mans on its first (and only - blame the FIA) outing. As for longevity on the other hand, it would probably would not last as long as a piston engine (assuming similar specific output of course).

  • OMG dude this sounds killer

  • Such a sick motor, great numbers as well for an N/a................but i still love my turbos! PShhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • Better than any exotic 

  • Pink Floyd and 4 rotor sound....is this heaven?

  • fuck the music off cunts, i wanna hear that rotor

  • I would love to see any other car get 513hp out of a 2.6L non-turbo!!!

  • @aejpml Cool thing is that mazda pulled 900hp+ from the R26B's they built for their 787B Le Mans car, however, they limited it to around 700hp @ 9000 rpm to increase the engine's reliability. Finding a 500+ 2.6L N/A piston engine, easy, look at F1 but 900hp... nope, fuck off, shop's closed, you need a Rotang for that bro.

  • talk about throttle response...

  • Wait im confused, ITB's i see on the top, but... an intercooler also?! Mind = Blown

  • @ieatrice9901 thats the radiator

  • @wikedkewl

    ohhh im retarded ;d

  • your video is going to give me a fuckin seizure.

  • that is sex on wheels, pls dont be rude to that baby ....

    just treat it right dude ;) ... like a se ..... racemachine ....

  • The one thing about Mad Mike is that even if his cars didn't have engines people would still be lining up to drive them with their feet, they have always looked SIK as

  • I expected much more than 513hp from it... I mean it sounds like 1000hp xD

  • @TechFreakNo1 513hp N/A, which is awesome. No turbo lag, just smooth power.

  • I feel violated.

  • sick fuckin song, even sicker car! nice job guys!

  • pink floyd and 4 rotor, this is badass

  • guess this explains where the Mad part of the name comes from... I'm happy with a regular rotary but there are those that like to break the limits, kudos Mad Mike kudos!

  • I'm hooked!

  • 850 ft of torque?

    goodamm

  • hey wath is the name of that song

  • @ELANTICREW welcome to the machine - pink floyd

  • right at 3:35 when he gives it full throttle yet the rpm's stay the same for a couple seconds before climbing, what is causing/allowing it to do that?

  • @tribaldrummergod I was wondering the same thing, most likely the dyno speed is held til he hits full throttle then he releases the dyno to begin the pull

  • Nice song choice!

  • Oh my god, that dyno graph made me horny, and the sound of the motor finished the job...

  • Where is this 4-rotor from?

  • @ManuelDr 26B = mazda 767 and 787B --- first Japanese car and the first car with anything other than a reciprocating engine to win the 24 Hours of Le Mans race outright, The 4 rotor - 26B N/A engine displaced 2622 cc and developed 700 hp (522 kW) at 9000 rpm.<---- WITHOUT TURBOS or supercharger

  • Comment removed

  • @guevodeplomo I know of the 26B, but where did these guys get one from? Out of curiosity, what country are you from?

  • Comment removed

  • @ManuelDr It is 2 13b's combined. Custom made, I believe.

  • @MikeNoran Radical, someone needs to make a 6-rotor and kick some supercar ass.

  • @ManuelDr are you crazy? 4 rotors can dust any supercar, you just gotta know how to handle it... know, in my personal opinion, 6-rotors can go for bigger and heavier cars, or medium-size suv's, just sayin'

  • @Angel090890 Fuck it make it a 8 rotor!

  • @ManuelDr hahaha...damn, with a 8-rotor even a truck can run the 10's flat

  • Heh looks like a right handfull

  • oh 4 rotor silly me

  • inline 4 ?

  • Big difference between the LSx and a 4 rotor is that the LSx will not rev over 10000rpms

  • @ThatLavishDrifta Doesnt need to, because it can make a ton more Kw and Nm

  • right on. awesome song for this video. pink floyd the machine!

  • yea wangus boys do it again

  • thats power i love rx7s

  • 500 rotary horses are not the same..........

  • sounds delicious!!!!

  • Who would want a v8 after this?

    only problem, my 8 gets about 8 miles to the gallon, this beast probably gets around 3

  • @TAP2HCK Hell my stock, n/a, 2 rotor won't do better than 15 in town lol

  • @TAP2HCK Who would want ANYTHING with pistons after this?!!!

  • @TAP2HCK V8 is a whole lot easier to find than a 4 rotor lol.And you can get the same hp and twice the torque fairly easily. But here's the thing... Not many can say they own a friggen 4 rotor.

  • @TAP2HCK

    haha i would have my 8 checked out if it was putting out 8mpg

  • @TAP2HCK And burns 3L less oil every fill ; )

  • gotta love getting 513.4HP out of a NON-TURBO :)

  • @sirvengence V12 = 800hp no turbo.

  • @DwnNvr A 2.6L v12.......? F1 sure... but then the 787b made 900hp from a 2.6 and finished LeMans with minimal engine wear.

  • @jcadlols actually the 787B made 700hp@9000rpm  600nm torgue, which is still damn impressive for a 2.6L naturally aspirated engine.

  • @DwnNvr v12...... this thing has a displacement of 2.6L, Your v12 making 800hp is probably 26L

  • @nwfklan No F1 3.0l or so. Or you could look at the FXX it has a bigger engine but at 6.x L its still small for having a V12 and 800hp.

  • @sirvengence FOR REALZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!

  • It's look like 1513 hp, not 513....

  • @Luzhnov08 lol they tuned it low so it will be more reliable for drifting

  • @2:50 ... I came

  • Beautiful car...truly beautiful.  I made me have tears come out of my eyes...Pink Floyd was a good choice in music too.

  • HOLY SHIT. I just got done ranting about how pissed I was about RX-7's. How if they kept a sweet rotary engine, they ruined the looks of the car, or if they kept the looks, they ruined the rotary engine by putting in a V8.

    Finally, this is how RX-7s should be done.

  • @J3R1N427i I'll agree that the 4 rotor is a bit smaller but I'm not convinced on it being any lighter. Anyone know how much the engine weighs? I've read that a 13b weighs around 215 lbs. Could a 26b be around 400? If so, an LS motor weighs about the same. A little more power, for a lot less torque? Not a trade I'd be willing to make. That said, the 26b sounds bad ass and is more original than an LS.

  • Correct me if i'm wrong but did I see 350 ft/lbs of torque? A figure a a stock LS motor will put out?

  • @MyOpinionMatterss You're obviously new to rotaries.

  • @philyt Why do you say that?

  • @MyOpinionMatterss Rotaries are notoriously weak on torque. Comparing it to the torque of a 5.7L V8 is apples to oranges.

    If you're bitchin' about torque on a rotary, you're looking at the wrong element.

  • @philyt I agree, I just never saw a NA 4 rotor on a dyno before.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss 350ftlbs is pretty darn good for a naturally aspirated 2.6L /158cu inch engine

  • @nipponbaka If you're comparing to a piston engine you have to double that. To calculate the displacement of a piston engine you have to take all the combustion cycles into account. A piston engine takes TWO revolutions of the crankshaft to accomplish this. When people (Mazda included) figure the displacement of a rotary engine they only figure one of the rotors combustion cycles (.65L) or ONE revolution of the eccentric shaft.

  • So to compare to a piston motor you have take 2.6 X 2 which equals 5.4L.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss haha i meant 5.2.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss well actually the actual displacement is 2600cc it all depends who you talk too, piston heads always like to double the capacity to make it sound less impressive rotor heads will always say its the smaller displacement, another thought when talking two stroke motorcross bikes (pistons) 125cc 250cc etc you dont get people saying double the capacity do you? 125cc=250cc 4cylcle 250cc=500cc4cycle

  • @nipponbaka It's not about making a rotary sound less impressive, it's about comparing apples to apples. Actually, now that you mention it, a 2 stroke motor would be a fair comparison to a rotary. Rotary motors are very impressive but in my opinion it's not because of the power per liter, but rather the power to weight ratio of the motor, and the fact that there are so little moving parts.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss yes Im a fan of both engines but having owned a RX4 and 2 FD RX7 theres no doubt they

    can rev and have a great power to weight ratio, hell I rememnber about 10 years ago when I took my engine to have it rebuilt (13B RX4) I actually lifted it into the trunk of my mothers car LOL weight about 80-90kg. cant do that with a V8 or many 4cylinder engines for that matter.

  • @MyOpinionMatterss if thats still not impressive you can always see the turbo'd 4 rotor version. 1664hp 1158ft/lbs watch?v=uO1782B6RZw

  • @nipponbaka Yes, I saw that. It is impressive!

  • Thats a lot of drama for 500 whp...

  • @ReiniGrauer that is 500hp na,no other stock naturally aspirated engine in a japanese ca can get that

  • what engine type is that?!

  • @andrewmai123 Rotary ...

  • Holy crap how many gears does that thing have? Six or seven? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I’ve kinda lost track.

  • All 4 rotors are not created equally. These engines cannot be brought as a crate. They are 100% one off custom made. The parts that are used in this rotary determines the total power output. Getting one of these built starts off @ 40k alone! Its super expensive to build and rebuild.

  • why hello mazda 

  • 513 hp from a quad rotor is fukin shit i knew pulse were shit. shouldnt it be double the pwer of a 13b since its two bolted together so it should be making around 600hp

  • @KaikokopuKartweelers well he only needs enough power to get him sideways and hold it.. not try for a 10sec 1/4

  • @KaikokopuKartweelers and no it ist 2 13b engines bolted together like scoot sport's 4 rotar engine,this is one complete engine

  • sounds like a ginormous rc nitro car

  • Oh man.

    So much internet hurt and butt angry in here.

  • that is fuckn powerfull and with no turbo! just having 1 rotor would kick the crap outs my car :S haha

  • what is the name of the song?????????????

  • @ladyman212 welcome to the machine by pink floyd

  • amazing video man

  • that car sounds weak my moped sounds better

  • how many revs???

  • Pink Floyd!! awesome engine also

  • best sounding 513 hp ever

  • @spiritcrusher923 and the best thing about this is it can pull so much more power with tunning!... can see at least 700whp on this porting!... and the r26b 4 rotor with the 3 spark plugs was able to pull 900whp+! :p

  • What I would give to own this car....

  • @PFCPure I know right?

  • welcome to the mother f***ing machine folks

  • 514 hp but how much pounds of torque? max Rpm?

  • so this is a full PP port engine like the R26B? looks like it has a tad bit more power

  • 515hp, isn't that similar to that what a 20b 3rotor is capable off NA?

  • @CykoNL No turbo

  • @jemuvegen

    thats what i said

  • @CykoNL OK sorry my fail

  • what`s the name of the song?

  • @sv21turbo Pink Floyd - Welcome To The Machine 

  • @laughsatposers thank`s :)

  • maybe mistimed video/audio?

  • In the shot of the HP @ 513 doese the line on the graph show it @ 850 +- ft/lbs ?

    3:52

  • @lame007 No, if you look closely when he zooms in, the torque curve is way down low and is scaled up due to the horsepower scale.

  • at 3:32 you see the throttle open all the way

    but there is chronic lag between this and when the engine responds?

    is that right or am i just being ignorant of some fact?

  • @DaftPACman It could be what gear it was in. I have no idea.

    I will say this, pedal to the floor free reving, my wankel doesn't rev rediculous fast. Throttle response isn't what i'd call "instant". It could also be in the tune. Hard to say. Pulse performance knows what they're doing though and mad mikes 4 rotor fd is hands down my favorite rotary powered car ever. Hands down.

  • @terribleoneprimopro check out scoops 4 rotor fucking insane...though this one is sick too

  • @DaftPACman I dont think that was lag. The dyno was loading the motor then let the motor wind out

  • interesting engine setup...not really a fan of the front cover being used...theres a reason it was changed in 93, it would have been better to upgrade the tone ring and gotten a better sensor setup then used the FC crank angle sensor

  • holy s**t! over 500hp with an n/a 4 rotor

    love it xD

  • Now I see why it has ignorant wheels and tires. It was built for drifting.

  • It is clearly seen that this car has no turbo, or turbo's. It is obvious that this engine has four individual throttle bodies, each with their own filter, and you would see the turbo if it had one.

    Unfortunately this awesome car has terrible wheels. Why would someone waste their time putting giant chrome wheels on a performance vehicle? Also what is with the stretched tires? The wheels and tires are a joke.

  • where do you see a turbo ? it's a 4 rotor ITB, NA dude ;).

    Just open your eyes, it's clearly visible on da vids :).

  • Comment removed

  • @the411is420 i would say its a reliability issue..turbo chargers make things more complicated 

  • @lilclown830 Exactly, much easier to maintain and because of the turbo lag, it's a lot more predictable N/A. No instant kick in the ass... which I honestly like myself haha

  • Sounds like a lion, mixed with a tiger, mixed with another animal that growls very loud and a ferrari all at once.

  • Its run like a F1

  • This engine is naturally aspired, the only way you can get an engine like this is building it from the ground up. PPRE is the best in rotary mechanics.

  • good mazda

  • @matt12466 if so, very short gears, like a mack truck..

  • ok thanx

  • is this non turbo??

    and is it the mercedes engine??

  • @monsterGAUZ Naturaly aspirated no mazda engine.

  • @monsterGAUZ Non-turbo .. rotary 4 rotor pure mazda no mercedes

  • @monsterGAUZ YES ITS TURBO AND NO ITS NOT MERCEDES ENGINE ITS A rotary engine

  • @RamRodRacer they dont make invisble turbo and if you open your ears num nuts you can here the turbo and and why would they put a intercooler on a non turbo car?

  • @RamRodRacer first of all turbos dont whistle they spool and and second they stoped using carborators in the 60's lame ass HAHAHA CARBORATORS (THERE CALLED THROTTLE BODIES NOW IN DAYS)

  • @RamRodRacer whatch the video from 3:49 to 3:48 you can here the turbo and your telling me to look shit up online HAHAH AND DO YOU EVEN KNOW WERE A TURBOCHARGER GOES ON A 4 ROTOR? YOUR JUST BURNING YOURSELF MAN KEEP IT COMMING

  • @RAMRODRACER correction on last one its 3:43 to 3:48

  • @RamRodRacer no one agrees with your ass look at every one who agrees with my comments.

  • @RamRodRacer your the one who needs to grow some balls because you just say stupid shit and back up what your saying it just shows that you a fucking fagget who dosnt now shit about any car

  • @RamRodRacer im not telling you youtubers im telling your pussy ass and the camera dosent show it but saw it in formula d atlanta and i know its there.

  • @RamRodRACER you couldnt tell the differnce from a throttle body and a carbarator

    you probly dont know the differnce between a male and female ahhahah i guess you llike dick you chicken shit.

  • @RamRodRacer YEA I GUESS YOU KNOW WHAT FOURTH GRADE COME BACKS ARE AND MY HEAD ISNT UP IN MY ASS ITS UP IN YOUR MOMS CUCHeee AND YOUR WIFES IF YOU HAVE ONE. HAHAHAHAH

  • @MrBOSS626

    Its spelt carburetor, theres nothing wrong with making fun of caburetor's or carburretor in the england way of spelling it but at least spell it right.

  • @Sefveron i realy dosnt matter you know what it siad so stop our bitching.