Added: 3 years ago
From: elpmurc
Views: 67,825
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lol....

  • chitty vs chitty

  • i love that wheel spin in the begining

  • Wait a minute!!!! A HHR is not a car made for racing of any kind, sooooo ya.

  • thats a fuckn hhr!!!!

    that race was way too close

    put my cobalt with the same 2.0 turbo up against that caliber n we'll c wats good =)

  • well unlike most of you i have actually driven both, the dodge was nice but had no onboard system to compensate for torque steer whereas the hhr had a launch control system, and the hhr definately did handle better, alot better, i would consider it close to a lowered gti where the caliber handled like an overpowered turd

  • HHR SS? Ewww

  • great drummer!!

  • That dodge is a butt as ugly car, infact, all chrysler products are fugly!LMAO!

  • @bradz123456 But a HHR or an aveo or cobalt is cool? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

  • @PutzkiSniper Are you fucking stupid, illiterate, or, just can't read!

  • @bradz123456 Haha, smart guy hu? Butt ugly? Lol Just looking at an HHR and Caliber SRT-4 you can tell wants built for racing and the other is a wanna be. No joke I saw a 70 year old woman driving a HHR SS. They are just like the Crapalier a wanna be. The 25k Cobalt SS is something but for its money can be out run.

  • @zTeamBiohazardx : More 70 yo women driving pt cruisers! LMAO! Than HHR's

  • @bradz123456 Your point being? The caliber looks nothing like a pt cruiser.

  • dodge the best chevrolet is a garbage car in a 2 or 3 years the future of chevrolet is the same that pontiac-vauxhal-opel-saab etc chevrolet or gm ar GARBAGE-GARBAGE-GARBAGE-GARBAG­E FOREVER

  • @koncept125 Chrysler won't be in business in two years!

  • @koncept125 : Bla,bla,bla, bla Chevrolet is a General Motors icon! All chrysler cars are garbage!

  • The HHR had a bad start ...

  • I've had problems with rotors on the hhr aswell. Took it back to the dealership and the reason they gave me was they had too much rust. I guess there is some crazy acid rain where I live cause I work seven days a week and the car is a daily driver. I've had three dif volkswagon cars that all had over 50.000km on the brakes, why would these gm brakes be done after 10,000km? poor quality!

  • SS looks like he launched with traction control on lol...

  • and the warped rotors is very common on the chevys.... I've had a cobalt and an uplander... the brakes lasted like 40k miles, but were warped after 5k... the rotors are made outta garbage... and i am a good driver

  • if you watch carefully the driver of the hhr F***ed up the launch might have been a much closer race if he knew how to drive

  • Yeah, he probably might have shaved off a couple tenths if he launched as well as the Caliber.

  • the caliber is a much better car than that shitty hhr.

  • Does the chevy even have a 6 speed like the caliber? And the caliber is also LSD, correct?

  • The CSRT4 does not have physical LSD (Neon had a Quaife LSD), instead it uses the ESP/TC/ABS system to slow down a spinning tire. The net effect is like an LSD, both front tires spin equally.

  • Good stuff although I would rather have a real LSD but the 6 speed is a very nice addition

  • @Moparman58 yeah but that's not saying much, there both two really gay cars.

  • @Moparman58 Other than the SRT having more HP, the HHR SS has way better quality especially the suspension compared to the caliber SRT just read the reviews. caliber SRT is good if your driving in a straight line, not that you could keep the SRT in a straight line with all that torque steer.

  • lmao

  • As much as I'm glad Chevy put a turbo in their 4 bangers, Caliber is way out of their league...

    Stock turbo caliber is capable of a mid-low 12sec pass on stock turbo... There is a lot of things holding the car back electronically. There are few in 11s with better turbo's and power numbers are there for 10sec pass already!

    Cobalt SS/TC is more of caliber competitor, HHR is not even close..

  • they are both in the same category. chevy's fault its slow.

  • where u pull this info outta... no matter what u put in that bus srt, its will always be a heavy pos fail fwd that will go no where near 10s

  • @RMena64

    Wait for spring and see how many are in 10s...

  • Considering the power plant under the hood and its ability to fit rims & tires from cars like the GT500 I'm sure this car will break into the 10's easy.

  • Interesting video. But there is way too little information other than less than ideal track conditions and less than desirable drivers. Where is the info on engine and trany in the vehicles. Also of interest to owners or prospective owners is what the MPG of each vehicle is according to the EPA. All we can tell about the 2 cars is that amateur drivers on a lousy track one beat the other. We have no idea of whether they are stock or one tricked out or how they mechanically compare.

  • hhahaha... dodge owns... i love those cars >:)

  • 14.3? Not bad in my book.

  • really?

  • Lol, both of these guys are piss poor drivers. Both cars are capable of far better runs than that!

  • a huevo es dodge fucking chevys dead mark

  • caliber was getting realed

  • As usual a race without the sense.

    A great personality (HHR) against a trivial car

  • chiefsnova is full of shit a hhr is 3280 lbs

  • chiefsnova... wrong...

    295 hp and 2400ccm

    not 2000ccm, and the chevy i don t know

    i work on jeep chrysler dodge subaru, and maybach

  • Chalk another one up to the Dodge boys.

  • well duh its a na 4 cyl vs a turbocharged 4cyl.! hmm whos gonna win?

  • there both turbo

  • Actually it was turbo versus turbo.....

    With 2 awful drivers who shouldn't go near a drag strip.

  • @slantsix73 I agree

  • I miss the original SRT-4 Neon. Bone Stock they ran 13.6 sec at 103 mph. Car and Driver mag numbers.

  • Funny because I trapped over 99.4 mph "Stock" in the 1/4 mile in my HHR SS. That might have been an Auto.

  • that was an lt in the video not an ss they need an ss vs srt 4 video

  • GM is crap. MOPAR OR NO CAR...or Nissan.

  • SRT4 Caliber 285hp @ 3,300 lbs curb weight to the HHR SS 260hp @ 4,200 lbs curb weight. If I was Crysler I wouldn't bragg to much.

  • HHR ss has a 3200 lbs curb weight, CSRT4 about 3200 as well.. Where did you get those numbers?

  • ok first off why are you even comparing the new turbo cobalt vs the caliber it would get crushed the cobalt has 275 bhp and its suppose to run low 13s to mid 13s so dont even compare them.

  • 285 bhp buddy, look it up

  • the 2008 cobalt ss beats the caliber srt4, do research on it. the ss hits 0-60 quicker, does the 1/4 faster, and has a faster lap time on the track.

  • the new cobalt ss was only 1 sec slower on the road track lap times next to the new camaro, either the new camaro ss is slow or the new cobalt is fast as hell

  • Problem is the new Camaro is still following American muscle car design - heavy, fast in a straight line, slow through the corners. The Cobalt SS is fast as hell in the corners, reasonably fast in a straight line. GM's stage kit should be out soon for it - then we will see some really fast Cobalt SS's.

  • yea the turbo cobalts are alot faster than the SC ones, at the track the new camaro ss ran only 2 secs faster than a new cobalt ss turbo

  • only 2 seconds? thats alot

  • At the end of the day -- its still a Cobalt (not a good thing).

    My '06 Cobalt LS Coupe fell apart in only 3 years. Horrible build quality. Dashboard rattles, electrical gremlins, cheesy plastics, broken trim pieces, flimsy seats, brake rotors that warp every 4,000 miles.... At least, I didn't pay 20k (Cobalt SS) for my piece of crap. GM engineered the Cobalt on the cheap -- and it shows.

  • hmmm you bout a base model and it fell apart what a suprise dumbass.... btw the reasons your rotors warped is because you have no fucking clue how to drive

  • Funny, nobody must know how to drive.

    My best friend's 05 Pontiac GTO had to correct warped rotors on 3 occassions.... An ex-girlfriend's Chevy HHR struggled with warped rotors, too.

    GM just sucks -- they cut corners (cost-cutting) on their brake system, using shoddy parts. I've owned about a dozen cars since I started driving (both daily drivers and classics) -- my previous Chevy is only one with chronic warped rotors.

  • The new cobalt ss has 260hp... you're both wrong

  • dodge owns. Too bad they quit making the neon srt-4. The caliber has 45 more hp and another gear, but still wont run as well.

  • Except that the Cobalt SS is nothing more than just a Colbalt with a bigger motor in it. It looks exactly the same as the regular Colbalt, as a fugly looking wal-mart wing on it. Yes, it probably is faster and handles better. Put the 2 head to head for a long race. See who comes out better in the end. My money is on the Caliber because SRT vehicles are made to race out of the box. They aren't necessarily designed for straight line performance.

  • the Cobalt SS will win. hit's 0-60 quicker, does the 1/4 faster, and is faster on lap time. and wal-mart spoiler? i'm guessing you are calling the previous sti and evo spoiler "ricer", and the cobalts isn't even that big. and you do have the option of having the bigger spoiler, or not having it. i'd rather have a coupe than a 4 door cross over suv.

  • yea the wing does look like shit actually, but i guess u need SOMETHING to tell the difference between an economy car and a slightly higher performance vehicle, id rather have a car that looks like its got some balls, stock, rather than having to do shit to it, like put a butt ass ugly wing on it, but, i do like the evo and sti wings, cuz they are the right cars for it, a cobalt, not so much, they are too hight in the rear end for any kind of bolt on bullshit

  • I don't think it really mattered if the HHR had traction control on or not. Either way it would have gotten its ass handed to it in a hand basket.

  • im glad that the HHR SS isn't the CSRT4's competitor, which the 08 cobalt ss is :). 08 Cobalt is better in every aspect than the CSRT4. lap time, handling, acceleration, braking, 1/4 time, gas efficiency, doesn't look like a soccer mom vehicle. the CSRT4 doesn't look all that bad though. I'd still prefer the looks of the HHR SS over the CSRT4, just because i'm a fan of retro vehicles.

  • lol better in every aspect you say? people who say the srt4 caliber looks like a soccer mom van is silly. the 08 cobalt is the same as the years past but this time with a turbo(bout 50hp more?) instead of a supercharger. the over all times between the Csrt4 and the cobalt is not that much different. but now lets talk about comfort & convenience! I have a wife & 2 small boys and the size of the csrt4 comes in handy. i love the cobalt too so this is not a bashing,i have a 05 stage2+ saturn redline

  • so than u prolly like the PT Cruiser?

  • dude dat aint a pt cruiser. pt cruiser is from chrysler , n this one is an hhr which is from chevrolettt!

  • truth be told it is a pt cruiser. the guy that designed the PT cruiser was fired from chrysler and hired on at chevrolet. this is the result

  • he had to had traction control on because in the very beginning, that took a good second or maybe two off the launch. HHR's arent even stage yet.

  • Look like the HHR had traction assist or something goin on............

  • already these two cars on the strip thats awesome, and wow that was quick for a caliber srt-4

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more