Among hard-core insiders, the New Age models its dogma on the Magis' cult of Mithra, as Nietzsche did. The cult has notable affinities to the Bulgarian-Cathar Bogomil cult. The New Age's most celebrated historical figure, its choice for the original "incarnation" of the Anti-Christ, is the Roman Emperor Tiberius who ordered the execution of Christ. [Some Roman emperors, most notably Caligula, became possessed by being initiated without being suitably prepared.]
The leading, putatively respectable Britain-based Satan cult (it worships Lucifer). The Lucis Trust, which runs the only religious chapel at the New York United Nations headquarters, The Temple of Understanding, was originaly founded as the Lucifer Trust, in London, in 1923. The Lucis Trust associated with the UNO is the New York affiliate of the British organization. The name was changed from Lucifer Trust, to Lucis Trust, to make the nature of the organization less conspicuous.
@AnonymousWhitePerson Moreover, Russell was a deeply compassionate person. Suffice it to say that he went to jail and lost his position at Cambridge for holding lectures on pacifism during the first world war. His advocacy of world government, which was backed by Einstein and others, was not sinister in the least -- he merely wanted to prevent a thermonuclear war between nations.
As regards world government, Russell explicitly held the view that nations should retain the right to settle all internal matters as they see fit, without external interference. The establishment of a world government is to regulate interactions -- between -- nations. If individuals don't have the right to kill one another, then nations shouldn't have the right to wage war on one another. Russell was a major advocate of peace, as anyone who has read him is aware.
If in doubt, simply read some Russell. (Don't take my word for it!) In particular, you might read "Human Society In Ethics and Politics," "Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare," and "Icarus, or the Future of Science," for starters.
Russell and the British Oligarchy are a pack of wild animals, and as such imitate the breeding habits of dogs. Their mating habits are wholly reflective of their rabidly Oligarchic worldview.
As for his philosophical writings: They are all an Oligarchic reproduction of the works of Aristotle. He is of same n pedigree as British philosophical Beast-Men as John Stuart Mill, David Hume, and such filthy animals as Thomas Hobbes and Jeremy Bentham and his Panopticon.
@AnonymousWhitePerson You are deeply ignorant if you believe that Russell's philosophy is simply Aristotle repackaged. True, Russell's neutral monism is a revival of Aristotle's hylomorphism, but he contributed much original work. I need only mention Russell and Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica."
British Liberalism is merely a quirky substitute for the more ancient dogma usually identified with the Aristotelean legacy and the ancient Apollo of Delphi.
The Rothschild gang initiated and directed the whole process: N.M. Rothschild and Sons director, Sidey Baillieu Myer was the chairman of the Mont Pelerin Society front the Tasman Institute, which co-wrote Kennett's ominosly-titled "blueprint for reform", Project Victoria;
The Rothschild gang initiated and directed the whole process: N.M. Rothschild and Sons director Sidney Baillieu Myer was the chairman of the Mont Pelerin Society front the Tasman Institute, which co-wrote Kennett’s ominously-titled “blueprint for reform”, Project Victoria;
British Fabian, Bertrand Russell was a great Pioneer for Depopulation and mass-murder.
His followers Sir Julian Huxley and Prince Philip Mountbatten advocate that at least 300,000 people must die per day of treatable diseases in order to "stabilize world population." Luckily, the IMF has taken care of that.
@AnonymousWhitePerson This is a great deal of foolishness. I have studied the works of Russell for many years, and I have never encountered any evidence that would suggest Russel supported mass-murder. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Russell and his followers in MI5 synthesized diseases in laboratories intended to wipe entire languages and cultures. This policy of mass genocide is perhaps today best expressed by Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh and his genocidal World Wildlife Fund.
@AnonymousWhitePerson "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so sure of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." (Russell) I regret to say that every conspiracy theorist I have encountered has been a fanatic, requiring little to no evidence for the beliefs they prefer to hold and an infinite amount of evidence for those towards which their temperament does not dispose them.
@AnonymousWhitePerson You're merely making assertions. I'm afraid you have become fanatical. In the words of Russell, "Fanaticism is THE danger of the world." Russell was a wonderful person who greatly enriched the intellectual culture of the world, whether through his writings on logic, mathematics, and philosophy or through his writings on social matters.
@AnonymousWhitePerson I have studied Russell's writings for many years, and I see no evidence for the claims you're making. Russell is, in my view, inspiring.
@AnonymousWhitePerson I'm afraid you are very confused. You must be repeating some piece of propaganda you've heard somewhere else. The War Office and MI5 conspired to ban Russell and his teachings during war time. The ban took effect September 1, 1916. As I stated before, Russell was then a pacifist and objected to the needless killing of civilians, so naturally the government thought him very wicked.
Bertrand Russell outlined in 1946 the Bernard Baruch Plan for World Government under the United Nations. His understudy then was Lord Victor Rothschild, a Cambridge Spy.
The strange character, Mad Hatter in the silly children's story, Alice in Wonderland was based on British logician, Bertrand Russell. The Chesire Cat was based on Alfred North Whitehead.
"It is impossible to describe Bertrand Russell except by saying that he looks like the Mad Hatter." - Norbert Wiener
In 1858, China's ports were opened to international trade. Opium poured into China on an even greater scale, and her emperors were powerless to stop it,
In 1842, the British stole Hong Kong in the Treaty of Nanking. The Russell (Bertrand Russell) family, which controlled the Rothschild arm of the US smuggling operation set up the Skull and Bones Fraternity at Yale. The Skull and Bones Society is rooted in Jewish Cabalism and European freemasonry, which practices death and rebirth rituals.
I appreciate that you are expressing yourself without insult, though I also am very familiar with Bertrand Russell's work both in Mathematics and Philosophy and have never read a single word suggesting advocating prepubescent sex. Also, he was a eugenicist in the weakest of terms and as he felt it unfortunate that intelligent, well educated people were not reproducing as their advancement becomes priority, but never advocated for the poor/disadvantaged to be forcibly prevented from reproducing.
If you do have proof of what you say in his quoted language and sources I would honestly (no sarcasm) be delighted to read it. If you have it please let me know.
To Russell the common man was a fat stupid human domesticated animal, much like livestock or poultry, to be eaten at the dinner table of a superior elite and predatory banker.
He was part of the World Government-United Nations crowd, who promoted in preemptive nuclear war in order to force nations to submit to world government.
Lord Russell was a danger to society and to himself. He should have mutilated his genitals forever.
He himself engaged in prepubescent sex himself as a wee lad. He was later given authority by the British government and MI5 to kidnap small school children and have them engage in prepubescent sex within small peer groups. Those abducted were studied closely and monitored.
scientistwriter - I'd be very curious to hear what your actual job title is, what formal training and education you have and where the hell you are getting this hysterical, nonsensical "Russell was a eugenicist!!!" bullshit from. Do you have a single (not web-based) source to back up your rambling incoherent blathering?
Oh, I see what you are saying. Admitting this, however, interrupts my train of thought and the shortcomings of my assertion. My argument notwithstanding is that Russell was an Inhuman Beast!
Funnily enough, I am confident that Russel was biologically human and in as much as Beast is a synonym for Animal, we're *all* beasts. But I'm being petty - your purpose is to malign his character, not make stupid accusations about his species.
And you may be right. I'm ignorant or Russel's character, so I can't lay a claim for or against. But even if I were to grant you your claim, what does Russel's character have to do with the value and clarity of his philosophy and arguments?
And once again - even if I grant your claim, what does that have to do with the value and clarity of his philosophy and arguments.
For example, Da Vinci was no less brilliant for being gay. Neitzche was no less brilliant for being... well... /odd/. So even if Russel was a racist fiend, all the philosophical works of his that I have read are not themselves racist.
So even if he was a racist fiend, so what?
Even if I grant you accusation, why should I care if it's true?
When you read his evil writings, I guarantee that you will have a very different opinion of him. He was for the extermination of entire races and for prepubescent sex.
M knowledge of BR's writings is by no means comprehensive - but those I have read have not been remotely racist and have been perfectly reasonable when touching on sexual emancipation, and even then only rarely.
So let us grant your latest claim as well. Even if all the writings of BR I haven't read are as you describe, in what way does that undermine such writings as I have read that are not?
I'm curious to see what you'll scrape up off the bottom of the ad hominem barrel next.
Judging by the frequency with which I bump into him, he must post at least a dozen of these disingenuously inflammatory comments a day -I have lost count of the number of times I have seen him kick in the door to bray his intentionally invidious jackassery.
To name but one example, on a video the Noam Chomsky/William F. Buckley debate, he has left what must average out to be three comments a day over the course of the last six months.
II. It is unclear to me what motivates him, but the staggering, indefatigable prolificacy with with he purses this little avocation causes me to suspect that he is mentally ill.
My humble advice is that he be roundly disregarded.
I post hoax comments of my own from time to time (in fact ubiquitousChe was a target this).
Aside from being an amusing diversion, this can be a surprisingly effective way to gain insight into how and why people come to accept or reject the validity of certain propositions.
I don't suppose you could spare a minute to tell me a bit about this study in which you participated?
@polymath7 He needs not some false motivation. If you ever read his works you'd know it's his virtue thats causes him to remain so pleasant. He was also very old at the time and staggering is just common. I have never heard of a disease which causes the victim to attain a happiness if so, I wish I could acquire such a disease.
In summary, Bertrand Russell was a racist, a eugenicist, a piss-poor mathematician, and an aristocrat who believed that only the white race should breed and all other classes and races should be depopulated.
In the Impact of Science on Society he states that the elite are going to breed the underclass into a seperate species from the ruling class. He states that innoculations and vaccinations will be designed to reduce the IQ of the average person and make them more easily ruled.
I believe I have found the source for scientistwriter's info and the other poster who think of Russell as "eugenicist". As I was doing reaserch regarding the AIDS epidemic I came upon a website which had a timeline of the emerging AIDS crisis. And there I found Russell being "quoted" as saying "organized plauges" are needed against certain people. Can you imagine that! Russell being included in a conspiracy theory site about AIDS! LOL!
I have repliead to "rhibac" in another Russell vid.
You want to see who is brainwashed? OK.
Bertrand Russell was never known as a "eugenics philosopher". I replied to "rhibac" that he most likely got his info from christian sites which spread urband legends and rumors about secular greats. So its obvious now as to who is brainwashed. Please check your facts before spreading hate.
I have read all of his bios, including his own autobio, and a great deal of his own books.
I know what he said regarding the breeding of a better society. But to call him a "lead eugenics philosopher"?
In the book "Dear, Bertrand Russell", a collection of his correspondence with the general public, he is asked about this and if he still thinks the black race inferior. He replies that he no longer holds those beliefs.
Come on..You actually believe that?? Of course he would say that to the public that he doesn't think the black race is inferior. You have to take with a grain of salt what all people of status and wealth say publicly as well as politicians. You think that if Bush said that he wasn't lying about WMD's in Iraq we should believe him?I am employing the same argument as you and that is how absurd it sounds.And I do not see where I wrote he is a "lead eugenics philosopher." He was one though.con't
Also Bertrand Russell was an aristocrat. And people who are rich have different agendas than those who are not. He was pushing an agenda.Not only that, but if you go by on his public testimony only, that means at one time he did hate blacks. Once a thief always a thief and once a racist always a racist. The way a person acts is the momentum that pushes them through life.
In closing, Bertrand Russell was a eugenicist, racist, sub-par mathematician, liar and a rich person who developed a predatory disdain for the underclass (people under him). He believed that only the white race should breed and every other class of person should be a slave.
And if you want to know about person sir I do not suggest you read what they write to the public. People want to have an image. They will say whatever so they do not tarnish their image and they want to seem friendly. Hitler will tell you that.
For a while he was supported by fellow philosopher George Santiyana. It was only after he published his history of philosophy that he became fanacially secure. I also know someone who met him.
Again, please check your facts before spreading your hate.
The Russells have been filthy rich for a long time. They helped the Royal Family run the drug trade to china all throughout the 1800's. Russell was never in need of money.
You owned me? You didnt even talk about the things I wrote. Refute any of my points I put down. You can't. Talk about UNESCO and Huxley. You cant because you know you would lose.
Lord Russell was a Malthusian monster. This grey-haired old man was a grotesque beast. Do not be fooled by his mild mannered demeanor and Mr. Magoo-like gait. Do not listen to these fools commenting below me. They are accursed fools, all of them.
They are but naive goyim yolked to their Gemeinschaft and have not yet awoken to the intense evil of this man. Slaying him, Aldous Huxley, HG Wells, and Charles Gallatin Darwin is a worthwhile pursuit.
Not only that you see in this video that he got an award from the United Nations. The United Nations during this time period looked toward a communist one world government my friend(and they still do, except they are more subtle about it). Not only that the master eugenicist Julian Huxley was the first man to hold the post of head of UNESCO. Hmmmm Russell got a prize from there. Still think he is not a eugenicist? Anyone who associates with the UN is a master bullshitter because the UN is BS
He speculated badly about eugenics but was not a eugenicist. I have also read hundreds of his private letters and the nearest thing I find to racism in him is a remark obout how off putting he found a black woman. You suggest I read his books but now you contradict yourself and tell me not to read what he wrote to the public (like his books)! Yes, he was an aristocrat but he hated this (did not like using his title) and he gave away his inheritance. Most of his adult life he was in need of money
Bush is in power but certainly to stupid to even be able to read Russell's works. If he would have done so he would not long for power anymore and stop pursuing it with so much violence!
Russell was a logician/ mathematician. Thank God no one in power cared about what he thought. Read his "general"works....nothing to say that was/is right. The idea of making the world crossword champion the global dictator was very popular. Lets stop making this guy important as a thinker for the future, without disrespecting his historical importance.
respect, this is the greatest moralist and thinker of our history. This mans ideas have altered the thoughts of many great thinkers such as Wittgenstein and Quine.
"How were you treated in prison?"
"Oh, very well, indeed. Very well."
Hahaha I love how peaceful and kind he is when he says that :)
treehugger625 7 months ago
"It is impossible to describe Bertrand Russell except by saying that he looks like the Mad Hatter." - Norbert Wiener
AnonymousWhitePerson 9 months ago
Among hard-core insiders, the New Age models its dogma on the Magis' cult of Mithra, as Nietzsche did. The cult has notable affinities to the Bulgarian-Cathar Bogomil cult. The New Age's most celebrated historical figure, its choice for the original "incarnation" of the Anti-Christ, is the Roman Emperor Tiberius who ordered the execution of Christ. [Some Roman emperors, most notably Caligula, became possessed by being initiated without being suitably prepared.]
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
"Apollo Cult of Delphi."
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
The leading, putatively respectable Britain-based Satan cult (it worships Lucifer). The Lucis Trust, which runs the only religious chapel at the New York United Nations headquarters, The Temple of Understanding, was originaly founded as the Lucifer Trust, in London, in 1923. The Lucis Trust associated with the UNO is the New York affiliate of the British organization. The name was changed from Lucifer Trust, to Lucis Trust, to make the nature of the organization less conspicuous.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson Moreover, Russell was a deeply compassionate person. Suffice it to say that he went to jail and lost his position at Cambridge for holding lectures on pacifism during the first world war. His advocacy of world government, which was backed by Einstein and others, was not sinister in the least -- he merely wanted to prevent a thermonuclear war between nations.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
As regards world government, Russell explicitly held the view that nations should retain the right to settle all internal matters as they see fit, without external interference. The establishment of a world government is to regulate interactions -- between -- nations. If individuals don't have the right to kill one another, then nations shouldn't have the right to wage war on one another. Russell was a major advocate of peace, as anyone who has read him is aware.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
If in doubt, simply read some Russell. (Don't take my word for it!) In particular, you might read "Human Society In Ethics and Politics," "Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare," and "Icarus, or the Future of Science," for starters.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
@DoNotLetUsBeHasty,
Russell and the British Oligarchy are a pack of wild animals, and as such imitate the breeding habits of dogs. Their mating habits are wholly reflective of their rabidly Oligarchic worldview.
As for his philosophical writings: They are all an Oligarchic reproduction of the works of Aristotle. He is of same n pedigree as British philosophical Beast-Men as John Stuart Mill, David Hume, and such filthy animals as Thomas Hobbes and Jeremy Bentham and his Panopticon.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson You are deeply ignorant if you believe that Russell's philosophy is simply Aristotle repackaged. True, Russell's neutral monism is a revival of Aristotle's hylomorphism, but he contributed much original work. I need only mention Russell and Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica."
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
@DoNotLetUsBeHasty,
Aristotle Imprisons the Mind.
British Liberalism is merely a quirky substitute for the more ancient dogma usually identified with the Aristotelean legacy and the ancient Apollo of Delphi.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
The British Oligarchy is an Alien Species.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
The United Nations is the British Empire in disguise.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson Hahahahahahahhahahahaha, to read things isn't necessarily to understand them
MrJimus1 1 year ago
His grotesque aquiline features and inflated skull are a result of continuous imbreeding.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
The Rothschild gang initiated and directed the whole process: N.M. Rothschild and Sons director, Sidey Baillieu Myer was the chairman of the Mont Pelerin Society front the Tasman Institute, which co-wrote Kennett's ominosly-titled "blueprint for reform", Project Victoria;
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Rothschild gang initiated and directed the whole process: N.M. Rothschild and Sons director Sidney Baillieu Myer was the chairman of the Mont Pelerin Society front the Tasman Institute, which co-wrote Kennett’s ominously-titled “blueprint for reform”, Project Victoria;
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
Sir Julian Huxley was a Eugenicist.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
British Fabian, Bertrand Russell was a great Pioneer for Depopulation and mass-murder.
His followers Sir Julian Huxley and Prince Philip Mountbatten advocate that at least 300,000 people must die per day of treatable diseases in order to "stabilize world population." Luckily, the IMF has taken care of that.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson This is a great deal of foolishness. I have studied the works of Russell for many years, and I have never encountered any evidence that would suggest Russel supported mass-murder. Quite the opposite, in fact.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
@DoNotLetUsBeHasty,
Russell and his followers in MI5 synthesized diseases in laboratories intended to wipe entire languages and cultures. This policy of mass genocide is perhaps today best expressed by Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh and his genocidal World Wildlife Fund.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so sure of themselves and wiser people so full of doubts." (Russell) I regret to say that every conspiracy theorist I have encountered has been a fanatic, requiring little to no evidence for the beliefs they prefer to hold and an infinite amount of evidence for those towards which their temperament does not dispose them.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson You're merely making assertions. I'm afraid you have become fanatical. In the words of Russell, "Fanaticism is THE danger of the world." Russell was a wonderful person who greatly enriched the intellectual culture of the world, whether through his writings on logic, mathematics, and philosophy or through his writings on social matters.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
@DoNotLetUsBeHasty,
Lord Russell was a British Fabian, an MI5 operative, a Eugenicist, and a Neo-Malthusian. He cannot be defended. How do you not know this?
I am guessing that you have not read his Impact of Science on Society and the Scientific Outlook.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson I have studied Russell's writings for many years, and I see no evidence for the claims you're making. Russell is, in my view, inspiring.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago 2
@AnonymousWhitePerson I'm afraid you are very confused. You must be repeating some piece of propaganda you've heard somewhere else. The War Office and MI5 conspired to ban Russell and his teachings during war time. The ban took effect September 1, 1916. As I stated before, Russell was then a pacifist and objected to the needless killing of civilians, so naturally the government thought him very wicked.
DoNotLetUsBeHasty 1 year ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
Bertrand Russell outlined in 1946 the Bernard Baruch Plan for World Government under the United Nations. His understudy then was Lord Victor Rothschild, a Cambridge Spy.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
The strange character, Mad Hatter in the silly children's story, Alice in Wonderland was based on British logician, Bertrand Russell. The Chesire Cat was based on Alfred North Whitehead.
"It is impossible to describe Bertrand Russell except by saying that he looks like the Mad Hatter." - Norbert Wiener
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
@AnonymousWhitePerson i'm not sure about that....i think that alice in wonderland was written before Russell became a famous logician.
littlepatchesofcolor 9 months ago
@littlepatchesofcolor,
The animated cartoon was created during Russell's lifetime.
AnonymousWhitePerson 9 months ago
"The Impact of Science on Society" and "The Scientific Outlook."
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago 2
Betrand Russell was a Paragon of World Government.
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 1 year ago
Lord Bertrand Russell advocated the swift extermination of entire races and prepubescent sex.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Behold, your convivial image of Russell has been forever tarnished. It was a filthy flimsy pantomime. In reality he was a Malthusian beast-man.
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
@DreadfulSolemnity
Behold: I have no idea what you're talking about.
profd65 2 years ago 2
In 1858, China's ports were opened to international trade. Opium poured into China on an even greater scale, and her emperors were powerless to stop it,
In 1842, the British stole Hong Kong in the Treaty of Nanking. The Russell (Bertrand Russell) family, which controlled the Rothschild arm of the US smuggling operation set up the Skull and Bones Fraternity at Yale. The Skull and Bones Society is rooted in Jewish Cabalism and European freemasonry, which practices death and rebirth rituals.
PrincessShittyBottom 2 years ago 5
He was a eugenicist who advocated drugs promiscuity and prepubescent sex.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
might wanna recheck your facts there bud.
jbond5150 2 years ago
Which facts?
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago 2
in other words, where did he say he advocated prepubescent sex and where did he give indication that he was a eugenicist?
jbond5150 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
I appreciate that you are expressing yourself without insult, though I also am very familiar with Bertrand Russell's work both in Mathematics and Philosophy and have never read a single word suggesting advocating prepubescent sex. Also, he was a eugenicist in the weakest of terms and as he felt it unfortunate that intelligent, well educated people were not reproducing as their advancement becomes priority, but never advocated for the poor/disadvantaged to be forcibly prevented from reproducing.
jbond5150 2 years ago
If you do have proof of what you say in his quoted language and sources I would honestly (no sarcasm) be delighted to read it. If you have it please let me know.
jbond5150 2 years ago
The Impact of Science on Society.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago 4
I wish your bitterness will kill you.
netivotham 2 years ago
A man's bitterness will purify the mind of your bastard mother.
HerrGeneralVonBraun 2 years ago
Even in death Russell still stirs it up! I love it how he makes "AnonymousWhitePerson" and others squirm!!!
Great man and philosopher!
ElGarotazo 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Comment removed
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago
Sir Julian Huxley was a eugenicist.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago 5
hes one of the greates pioneers
thehumanSAM 2 years ago
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
Read the Impact of Science on Society.
He was also a paragon of incest and prepubescent sex, and that is no mere exaggeration.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Sure, fellow Jew.
Anything for my favourite neightborhood Jew.
ludachris475 3 years ago 4
To Russell the common man was a fat stupid human domesticated animal, much like livestock or poultry, to be eaten at the dinner table of a superior elite and predatory banker.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Lord Russell was also a utopian.
He was part of the World Government-United Nations crowd, who promoted in preemptive nuclear war in order to force nations to submit to world government.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
Lord Russell was a danger to society and to himself. He should have mutilated his genitals forever.
He himself engaged in prepubescent sex himself as a wee lad. He was later given authority by the British government and MI5 to kidnap small school children and have them engage in prepubescent sex within small peer groups. Those abducted were studied closely and monitored.
ludachris475 3 years ago
He's my personal hero.
agnosticcc 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
I do hope this is one of your hoax comments.
If not, you are an utter lunatic.
polymath7 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
scientistwriter - I'd be very curious to hear what your actual job title is, what formal training and education you have and where the hell you are getting this hysterical, nonsensical "Russell was a eugenicist!!!" bullshit from. Do you have a single (not web-based) source to back up your rambling incoherent blathering?
sleepcity 3 years ago 2
... And after the critical thinker asked his question, there was three months of silence.
:P
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago 3
Lord Bertrand Russell was more evil than we know.
ludachris475 3 years ago
But... Hang on... Wait...
If you *know* that he was so evil, doesn't that undermine your claim that he was more evil than we know?
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
He thrice committed grotesque acts against children and the heavens revolted.
ludachris475 3 years ago 2
Oh, I see what you are saying. Admitting this, however, interrupts my train of thought and the shortcomings of my assertion. My argument notwithstanding is that Russell was an Inhuman Beast!
ludachris475 3 years ago
Funnily enough, I am confident that Russel was biologically human and in as much as Beast is a synonym for Animal, we're *all* beasts. But I'm being petty - your purpose is to malign his character, not make stupid accusations about his species.
And you may be right. I'm ignorant or Russel's character, so I can't lay a claim for or against. But even if I were to grant you your claim, what does Russel's character have to do with the value and clarity of his philosophy and arguments?
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago 3
Read the Impact of Science on Society and the Scientific Outlook. Russell was a racist fiend.
ludachris475 3 years ago
And once again - even if I grant your claim, what does that have to do with the value and clarity of his philosophy and arguments.
For example, Da Vinci was no less brilliant for being gay. Neitzche was no less brilliant for being... well... /odd/. So even if Russel was a racist fiend, all the philosophical works of his that I have read are not themselves racist.
So even if he was a racist fiend, so what?
Even if I grant you accusation, why should I care if it's true?
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago
When you read his evil writings, I guarantee that you will have a very different opinion of him. He was for the extermination of entire races and for prepubescent sex.
ludachris475 3 years ago
M knowledge of BR's writings is by no means comprehensive - but those I have read have not been remotely racist and have been perfectly reasonable when touching on sexual emancipation, and even then only rarely.
So let us grant your latest claim as well. Even if all the writings of BR I haven't read are as you describe, in what way does that undermine such writings as I have read that are not?
I'm curious to see what you'll scrape up off the bottom of the ad hominem barrel next.
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago
His Prinkipia Mathematica was also a piece of crap.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Interesting discovery for applied rhetoric:
It *is* possible to clutch at straws and scrape the bottom of the barrel at the same time!
^_^
UbiquitousChe 3 years ago
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago
Che, I'm familiar with this ludachris475.
Judging by the frequency with which I bump into him, he must post at least a dozen of these disingenuously inflammatory comments a day -I have lost count of the number of times I have seen him kick in the door to bray his intentionally invidious jackassery.
To name but one example, on a video the Noam Chomsky/William F. Buckley debate, he has left what must average out to be three comments a day over the course of the last six months.
polymath7 3 years ago 7
II. It is unclear to me what motivates him, but the staggering, indefatigable prolificacy with with he purses this little avocation causes me to suspect that he is mentally ill.
My humble advice is that he be roundly disregarded.
polymath7 3 years ago 5
Is not mental illness, some comments come from people performing field tests on us for scientific studies. I know that because I was there.
juanpareto 3 years ago 2
I post hoax comments of my own from time to time (in fact ubiquitousChe was a target this).
Aside from being an amusing diversion, this can be a surprisingly effective way to gain insight into how and why people come to accept or reject the validity of certain propositions.
I don't suppose you could spare a minute to tell me a bit about this study in which you participated?
polymath7 3 years ago 3
what sort of field tests?
chica476 2 years ago 2
@polymath7 He needs not some false motivation. If you ever read his works you'd know it's his virtue thats causes him to remain so pleasant. He was also very old at the time and staggering is just common. I have never heard of a disease which causes the victim to attain a happiness if so, I wish I could acquire such a disease.
ZYKLONBKILLSHITLER 1 year ago
@ZYKLONBKILLSHITLER
I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
polymath7 1 year ago 3
@polymath7 Humble indeed.
mrminimuzza 1 year ago
please, stop telling lies ...u r only making an idiot of your own self..just do us a favor and go away
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
I am simply telling the truth.
Bertrand Russell encouraged prepubescent sex among school children. This is a documented fact.
ludachris475 3 years ago
ok..now that we heard what u have to say can u just go away and leave us who like this genius to enjoy time watching clip of him...thank u
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
In summary, Bertrand Russell was a racist, a eugenicist, a piss-poor mathematician, and an aristocrat who believed that only the white race should breed and all other classes and races should be depopulated.
ludachris475 3 years ago
It would confound all of us, should you choose to provide the smallest of bases for you indictment,
doublej999 3 years ago 9
Comment removed
ludachris475 3 years ago 2
In the Impact of Science on Society he states that the elite are going to breed the underclass into a seperate species from the ruling class. He states that innoculations and vaccinations will be designed to reduce the IQ of the average person and make them more easily ruled.
ludachris475 3 years ago
ok, mr.smart pants craving for attention..we heard ya..now go away..
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago 4
According to the Darwinistic Human Agenda, the 'New Woman' is to eat the hermaphroditic weaker male.
ludachris475 3 years ago
I believe I have found the source for scientistwriter's info and the other poster who think of Russell as "eugenicist". As I was doing reaserch regarding the AIDS epidemic I came upon a website which had a timeline of the emerging AIDS crisis. And there I found Russell being "quoted" as saying "organized plauges" are needed against certain people. Can you imagine that! Russell being included in a conspiracy theory site about AIDS! LOL!
dogx15 3 years ago 3
did they give a source for that quote?
LothairApoclyane 3 years ago
No, they did not give a source for the quote.
If you like I'll look for the web page so you could check yourself. - dogx15
DirzoRasec 3 years ago
Read the Impact of Science on Society.
He was also a paragon of incest and prepubescent sex, and that is no mere exaggeration.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Russell was beyond brilliant...
sleepcity 3 years ago 2
n 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the "necessity for "organized" plagues" against the Black population.
rhibac 3 years ago
At least there is one person who is not a brainwashed motherfucker.
RHIBAC I salute you for being smart. Everyone else is a dumbass.
Bertrand Russell was a bad bad man.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
I have repliead to "rhibac" in another Russell vid.
You want to see who is brainwashed? OK.
Bertrand Russell was never known as a "eugenics philosopher". I replied to "rhibac" that he most likely got his info from christian sites which spread urband legends and rumors about secular greats. So its obvious now as to who is brainwashed. Please check your facts before spreading hate.
dogx15 3 years ago
Dude the next thing you are going to say is that Sir Julian Huxley (Russell's good friend) wasn't a eugenicist.
Have you ever read any of Bertrands books?
I suggest you read his Impact of Science on Society.
In there he talks about how the authorities are going to breed people until they become almost different species between rulers and ruled.
And lets just get one thing straight. I do not believe in God. This is a fact dude. I am not getting anything from xtian sites. Read his books.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
I have read all of his bios, including his own autobio, and a great deal of his own books.
I know what he said regarding the breeding of a better society. But to call him a "lead eugenics philosopher"?
In the book "Dear, Bertrand Russell", a collection of his correspondence with the general public, he is asked about this and if he still thinks the black race inferior. He replies that he no longer holds those beliefs.
dogx15 3 years ago
Come on..You actually believe that?? Of course he would say that to the public that he doesn't think the black race is inferior. You have to take with a grain of salt what all people of status and wealth say publicly as well as politicians. You think that if Bush said that he wasn't lying about WMD's in Iraq we should believe him?I am employing the same argument as you and that is how absurd it sounds.And I do not see where I wrote he is a "lead eugenics philosopher." He was one though.con't
scientistwriter 3 years ago
When I say he was one I mean he was a eugenics philosopher.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
Also Bertrand Russell was an aristocrat. And people who are rich have different agendas than those who are not. He was pushing an agenda.Not only that, but if you go by on his public testimony only, that means at one time he did hate blacks. Once a thief always a thief and once a racist always a racist. The way a person acts is the momentum that pushes them through life.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
In closing, Bertrand Russell was a eugenicist, racist, sub-par mathematician, liar and a rich person who developed a predatory disdain for the underclass (people under him). He believed that only the white race should breed and every other class of person should be a slave.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
And if you want to know about person sir I do not suggest you read what they write to the public. People want to have an image. They will say whatever so they do not tarnish their image and they want to seem friendly. Hitler will tell you that.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
For a while he was supported by fellow philosopher George Santiyana. It was only after he published his history of philosophy that he became fanacially secure. I also know someone who met him.
Again, please check your facts before spreading your hate.
dogx15 3 years ago 2
You are an idiot.
The Russells have been filthy rich for a long time. They helped the Royal Family run the drug trade to china all throughout the 1800's. Russell was never in need of money.
My hate? My facts.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
Russell, not his family. Please stay on subject.
dogx15 3 years ago 3
hhahahahahahaha
I am done with you. Idiot.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
Of course. I owned you and took you to school on this subject.
You ended up with eight grade name calling. Geez!
dogx15 3 years ago 4
You owned me? You didnt even talk about the things I wrote. Refute any of my points I put down. You can't. Talk about UNESCO and Huxley. You cant because you know you would lose.
scientistwriter 3 years ago
Look, bots are getting funny!
Almost as fun (and as serious) as Paris Hilton spam.
rockslavesoft 3 years ago 4
Quick, don this wig, put on this dress, and smear a bottle of Scotch all over your body.
The Paparazzi might mistake you for Paris Hilton.
AnonymousWhitePerson 2 years ago 3
Lord Russell was a Malthusian monster. This grey-haired old man was a grotesque beast. Do not be fooled by his mild mannered demeanor and Mr. Magoo-like gait. Do not listen to these fools commenting below me. They are accursed fools, all of them.
They are but naive goyim yolked to their Gemeinschaft and have not yet awoken to the intense evil of this man. Slaying him, Aldous Huxley, HG Wells, and Charles Gallatin Darwin is a worthwhile pursuit.
ludachris475 3 years ago
Not only that you see in this video that he got an award from the United Nations. The United Nations during this time period looked toward a communist one world government my friend(and they still do, except they are more subtle about it). Not only that the master eugenicist Julian Huxley was the first man to hold the post of head of UNESCO. Hmmmm Russell got a prize from there. Still think he is not a eugenicist? Anyone who associates with the UN is a master bullshitter because the UN is BS
scientistwriter 3 years ago
He speculated badly about eugenics but was not a eugenicist. I have also read hundreds of his private letters and the nearest thing I find to racism in him is a remark obout how off putting he found a black woman. You suggest I read his books but now you contradict yourself and tell me not to read what he wrote to the public (like his books)! Yes, he was an aristocrat but he hated this (did not like using his title) and he gave away his inheritance. Most of his adult life he was in need of money
dogx15 3 years ago
Bush is in power but certainly to stupid to even be able to read Russell's works. If he would have done so he would not long for power anymore and stop pursuing it with so much violence!
vacterl 4 years ago
The world loves its own.
boobtuber06 4 years ago
Russell was a logician/ mathematician. Thank God no one in power cared about what he thought. Read his "general"works....nothing to say that was/is right. The idea of making the world crossword champion the global dictator was very popular. Lets stop making this guy important as a thinker for the future, without disrespecting his historical importance.
haldenver 4 years ago
Russell is a douche for many reasons, but he is historically important
shovelcharge 3 years ago
thinkers will always be remembered for thinking....knowing is unchasable for the man who chases holds no ground in the land of leaders.
papertigerlove00 4 years ago
Nice to see. Should be more Russell videos on the web.
LamaJoMaMa 4 years ago 2
Mankind owes a great deal to thinkers like B Russell.
Philos2006 4 years ago
LordRussell I agree wholeheartedly. He was brilliant in thought and wrote brilliant polemics.
nontheistdavid 4 years ago
What's that Russell? Peace and happiness for all mankind? Pure Balderdash old boy!
Geprodis 4 years ago
respect, this is the greatest moralist and thinker of our history. This mans ideas have altered the thoughts of many great thinkers such as Wittgenstein and Quine.
LordRussell1978 4 years ago
nopes, proffessor yaffle from bagpuss
benjykid 4 years ago
Anyone else think his voice sounded EXACTLY like Emperor Palpatine's at the end of that video?
jack44688 4 years ago
lol..on another video he sounds like gandhi..
ramsmenon 4 years ago
I thought the same thing! lol
JDRedstone 4 years ago