This can't actually be a serious course at an accredited college. He can't spell pseudepigrapha and anything he said about Enoch was incorrect except for his correction of Enoch being six after Adam. Assuming too much while knowing too little.
One of the most important assumptions this guy makes, with which I agree, is that people have not changed much in 2,000 years. In other words, we moderns ain't so great and we aren't more advanced than our most recent ancestors; we might even be less evolved--i.e. we have devolved it seems to me.
i can sum up this guy as either delusionally arrogant or just an arrogant pathological liar, just make up your self-indulgent fairytales that you expect intelligent people to take as actual history. So who taught you that you can "believe literature" but you can't believe "recorded history". How do you have a job if people in your field believed this way, there would be no department, or "college of.." You tried to brainwash the whole room with this crap,ask the archaeology dept if they agree
He is a liar, and if he represents the idealogy of the university system then the whole thing is from hell. First of all, Enoch left this earth at 365 years old, he was taken by God, the God of the Bible, the One True God. He also expects people to believe that since he is referring to a copy of a scripture in a different language means it was a lie. This logic begs me to ask what language was the truth spoken in. 29000 known ancient Bibles, 60 of Homer's fiction, don't believe a lie.
I just heard of Dr. Eisenman the other day. They said he was let go for exposing the truth behind the DSS. I wanted to see what he exposed. This video is named DSS, but is all Bible. Where can I find Eisenman on DSS? I ordered his book, but interested in video.
This can't actually be a serious course at an accredited college. He can't spell pseudepigrapha and anything he said about Enoch was incorrect except for his correction of Enoch being six after Adam. Assuming too much while knowing too little.
colbytownsend 1 month ago
One of the most important assumptions this guy makes, with which I agree, is that people have not changed much in 2,000 years. In other words, we moderns ain't so great and we aren't more advanced than our most recent ancestors; we might even be less evolved--i.e. we have devolved it seems to me.
jimbojamesIV 1 year ago
i can sum up this guy as either delusionally arrogant or just an arrogant pathological liar, just make up your self-indulgent fairytales that you expect intelligent people to take as actual history. So who taught you that you can "believe literature" but you can't believe "recorded history". How do you have a job if people in your field believed this way, there would be no department, or "college of.." You tried to brainwash the whole room with this crap,ask the archaeology dept if they agree
Jahbulonloses 1 year ago
He is a liar, and if he represents the idealogy of the university system then the whole thing is from hell. First of all, Enoch left this earth at 365 years old, he was taken by God, the God of the Bible, the One True God. He also expects people to believe that since he is referring to a copy of a scripture in a different language means it was a lie. This logic begs me to ask what language was the truth spoken in. 29000 known ancient Bibles, 60 of Homer's fiction, don't believe a lie.
Jahbulonloses 1 year ago
I just heard of Dr. Eisenman the other day. They said he was let go for exposing the truth behind the DSS. I wanted to see what he exposed. This video is named DSS, but is all Bible. Where can I find Eisenman on DSS? I ordered his book, but interested in video.
omatous 1 year ago
Son of Man coming on the Clouds of Heaven
omarkarrow 2 years ago
You're de-luted if you believe that!
99minerkc 2 years ago
Esenman is gangsta!!!! woop woop!!
jigaboojones 2 years ago
Thanks so much. I have two of Eisenman's books, I just love them.
jupiterjjrm 3 years ago 2
Thank you for this video.
riversideharp 3 years ago 2