Added: 3 years ago
From: ImportRace
Views: 54,636
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (297)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ...lol i ran 15.308 in my prelude with exhaust and a high flow cat hahaha. fucking driver mod required.

  • Couldn't run a 15 if i tried

  • dude that fucking sucked and the srt driver is shit

  • people say the srt driver let it go but forget the drivers the mr2s are way better !"= fact

  • This srt4 driver must also own that 14.6s GTO

  • srt got shit on

  • 15 srt wtf

  • I hear that stock SRT boost is around 17psi+ is that true? 

  • @tnizzle916  buddy just baught one and its more 12 and 15 psi with stage one mopar ecu

  • I pulled off a 13.9 with only upgraded custom exhuast in great conditions. SRT driver in this race messed up shifting that run.. prolly doesn't know how to handle his car. Driver mod needed?

  • mr2 is top of the line mr2

    n20 set up

    turbo charger

    upgraded engine and everything

    but the dodge is most likely stock

  • @redghost105 Stock and in some serious need of a driver mod...

  • why's everyone talking like the srt4 is a real car? its a piece of shit dodge neon.

  • @fucingpwnz0rz Grow up... stupid 15 year olds these days.

  • why the hell is that srt4 going so slow? hint, bad driver?

  • @difrankie The mr2 driver sucked ass too, It needed a way better driver and it would have won by a lot more.

  • wow the driver of that srt sucked. they run AT LEAST a 13.5 stock.

  • @JackhXc92 in fanboy land maybe. they're 13.9-14.1 with a good driver in real life.

  • @JackhXc92 no they don't

  • @bettermaxim 13.8, my bad.

  • @JackhXc92 srt4 can be fast don't get me wrong but stock there in the high 14's low 15's

  • @bettermaxim Actually, they run high 13's, low 14's stock with an at least decent driver.

  • @xP00Px ya low 14 at best. not At least 13.5 like other dude stated.

  • @bettermaxim Actually, I think l mid to low 13's is the record for a bone stock srt4. But yeah, most will run right around 14 stoc

  • @bettermaxim Wrong again. Stock there in the mid 14s to high 13s.

  • @seiferx8 ya thats pretty much wat i said. other guy on here was saying the srt4 does at least 13.5, meaning that would be the srt4's worse time which i completely disagree with. A really really good driver and really really good condition and temp you could pull off high 13's....maybe

  • @JackhXc92 No doubt, The MR2 driver sucked badly, he should of had that race by a lot more.

  • Neons are gay and anything that looks like one is gay.

  • You could already tell who was going to win by the title. A Stock MR2 could probably smoke the Srt-4. (Upgraded peice of crap neon)

  • @cmd1120 nope. 6secs/14.7 vs 5.3ish 14.1 to the neon. now if the mr2 is jdm, then probably.

  • @cmd1120 If its not your car then stfu.

  • srt4 couldn't drive it

  • Lol kids on here racing with spec sheets

  • damn srt's suck

  • nice....

  • SRT AINT SHIT

  • The mr2 is fast and the srt driver sucks

  • wow, 13.8 on a 1/8th, these cars where flying! lol...

  • thats a 1/4 u idiot lol

  • thats what you get for being front wheel drive

  • damn he killed him

  • rape!!!

  • Comment removed

  • What year is that Toyota spyder MR2? it look ridiculous. 2000-2005 TSMR2 are looking better than that.

  • It's not a Toytoat Spyder its a 1991- 1993 MR2 SW20 AND IMO the 1993 to 1995 look better they just have to be dropped and given a good paint job

  • I got a 1992 Toyota MR-2 Five speeds manual transmission with a 2.2L. Want to sell it out for $2,500.00. Red color. Everything is stock and no accident.

  • @forumreader1 thats a 1990-1995 mr2 turbo. the second generation

  • thank!

  • srt 4 runs 14.0 stock that driver sucks

  • The quarter mile is overrated. Fuck the quarter mile. If I want to drag race, I'll drive a dragster. Where the MR2 really shines is on a closed circuit race track, where the mid-mounted engine design is in it's element.

  • is that srt4 stock cuz a bmw m3 e46 is a mid 13s car so i doubt that srt4 is that fast mayb that shit is slow as fuck or the driver is barbage

  • don't matter what you srt4 guys are saying.... dodge sucks ass on quality and reliability. My 89 MR2 MK1 already has about 290,000 miles on it already and i can still pull hard.... can you guys say the same of your SRT4s

  • the guy or what evers driving the srt4 SUCKS!!!!

  • i like mr2s alot but srtsare stronger stock looks like he skips agear

  • that srt-4 even stock should not be doing high 15's. a blind man can drive it faster

  • i dont care wut circumstances are... the mr2 pulled hard on the srt...

  • stock srt-4. put a stage 3 up against that MR2 and see what happens.

  • but a stage 3 srt4 with a stage 3 mr2 and see what happens foo. You should know that MR vehicles have even a better launch then awd vehicles. Plus MR2s get up even more in a higher gears like 4 and 5.

  • dipshit.

    24okay said it..

  • dipshit huh? nice choice of words. faggot.

    that srt was bone stock and had a shitty driver. he ran in the 15's. im not banging on the mr2, i just think a correctly modded srt with a better driver would be a good race.

  • Mod this and mod that, its a stock race the the SRt4 is a POS so of course the MR2 will take it.

    I was drag racing when you were sucking on your moms tits still, always there is NOTHING but excuses. BUT at the end of the race there is NOTHING MORE then a LOSER and a WINNER PERIOD!

  • im not making excuses. you can clearly tell the mr2 is not stock. you cant even hear the srt, and he runs a 15.6 or whatever. srts run high 13's all day bone stock. but its cool man, say what you want. im done arguing about this.

  • u dumass the mr2 comes stock with a turbo and an intercooler--so it sounds like that when stock

  • really? wow im glad you enlightened me on that. and since when does a intercooler make the car sound any differently?

  • no i ment its sound like the vid stock and adding a turbo and intercooler to an srt4 would make the car equal to the mr2 not better

  • don't argue with me if you don't even know what your talking about. SRT-4's come with a turbo and intercooler.

  • ?? i didnt know that -- never looked into it cause the srt4 is REALLY SLOW--jus look at the vid

  • obviously you don't know much about these cars. they are one of the fastest FWD production cars ever made. the driver in this video just sucks at driving. and with a few minor bolt-ons, srt's can do high 12's in the quarter. don't believe me? look up some vids on it.

  • lmao skylines fastest production 4wd cars--they pull high 8's---and a toyota mr2 with bolt ons can run a low 10

  • oh and can you specify which srt4 your talking about? the neon srt4 or the caliber srt4?

    oh and they only pulled 215 hp even w/ the turbo

  • the Neon srt4 and no im affraid your wrong, bone stock 2003 srts have 248 at the wheels, the 2005's have bigger injectors and have a LSD trans. they put out 255+

    maybe the mr2 is faster, all im saying is that the srt could have ran a lot faster then a 15.3

  • sorry but those skittles aren't that fast. Sold mine for a crx. Srt-4's suck ass. My friend has one and I would much rather drive a turbo crx any day. Remember an srt-4 is still a neon faggot.

  • depends on what year the 04 and 05 pulled 230 the 03 pulled 215.

  • thats what most websites say, but what you probably don't know is that dodge under rated the SRT's horsepower, 04's and 05's have over 250hp bone stock.

  • the guy with the srt doesn't know what he's going! lol15.3 lol!

  • lol you got to go with european, i have a 924S porsche that only has 150hp but can do 140mph, lets see an american car do that!

  • ???...That doesn't mean shit, it's all about acceleration when it comes to drag racing.

  • sorry but i like alittle more of a challenging race that involves driver skill and not who can throw the most money in a car, so i like light, well handling, high speed cars... but you wouldnt understand would you??

  • Shifting gears on a drag strip requires skill- even if you put in a little cash in it.

    However, I never even mentioned anything about putting money in a vehicle, I was speaking of acceleration.

    With your 924s having a Turbocharged version that is not even fast enough on acceleration to take on American vehicles...you gotta think, whats the point of liking a challenge without having one bit of a chance of winning?

    Looking at their times even a Turbo'd MKII MR2 would smoke a 924s.

  • Well if you knew your cars you would know that the 924S dosent come in a turbo version, its only the 944 and the original 924. And also the 924S wasnt designed for drag racing, it was made to out handle any other car at high speeds!! and the MKII SUCK, i had an 87 MR2 supercharged that could smoke a MKII turbo!!!

    and i bet my 69 302 falcon could take it to!

  • What you talking about? the MKII Turbo MR2 are the fastest MR2s to date. I said 924s as in the 924 model, not the 924"S".

    Out handle "any" car at high speeds?It's not like your 924s would catch up with a 1967 Sting Ray corvette on the track. Just as fast at top speed but faster at acceleration.

    You'd only find yourself trying to catch up with the Vette, not out handling it, even at high speeds.

    It seems you favor your car too much that you end up being ignorant.

  • listen the 924 and the 924S are 2 complete different cars!!! the only similarities are the body. are you serious, have you even drivin a 67 stingray, try taking a 90 degree turn at 60mph you will be in the ditch!! you really should get to know your cars before you call somebody ignorant!

    just because a car can get to 60 in 4 seconds dosent mean it the best. at a SCCA race i beat a 2008 roush supercharged mustang with around 500hp, Can you explain that?

  • Thats like saying the Porsche CarreraS is not a Carrera at all.

    I also don't believe what you have said, bragging over the internet doesn't prove anything at all. Unless you can come up with some material proof.

    You may be another internet dude lying about what he has achieved.

    Also, acceleration can play a huge part on a track race. Take a look at the nurburging track records, can your 924S top any of those vehicles?

  • So what your saying is that the 1st generation MR2 is the exact same as the 2nd?? they might be the same model but things are changed, LOOK it up on the internet!!!! and you obviously haven't driven a Porsche, i can tell!! you cant judge are car until you have driven one.see thats the funny thing, iv drivin all the car you have mention so you have no room to talk!!

  • I've driven a 944Turbo (which also has an "S" model) that my friend owns.

    You can't really tell whats what on the net- with that being said, you are making assumptions.

    What I am saying is: A turbo'd MKIII Supra is still a MKIII Supra, it just more upgraded.

    Seeing how the your 924S started from 1986-88 while the 924 class started from 1976-88, your 924S is still a 924 of the same generation but to be more specific, it is an "S" model. Same generation. It's a 924 in general.

  • well the 944 turbo does not have a S model the 944 does! and if you knew anything about Porsche the 924S is set up on a completely different basis, all the suspension and drive terrain is completely different than the original 924. you ether are lying about driving the 944 or are just completely retarded about cars!!! and considering that i trade cars to make my living i don't think im lying about driving them

  • Like I said, bragging about which cars you have driven on the net don't prove a thing. Anyone can drive a 944 Turbo and even a 924S!

    Also, if you actually know shit about cars, the higher end variations always have upgraded parts when compared to the other version. Say, a Camaro SS opposed to a Camaro ZR-1. Both have different basis but is still a Camaro.

  • Oh yeah, and bragging what you have driven doesn't mean shit. I could say I've driven a McLaren F1 and it wouldn't prove anything at all.

  • plus mclarens are overrated, i can just tell your a ricer!!

  • over rated?? it beats the bugatti veyron to a 100mph and for a car that was made in 1994 that is pretty damn underated if you ask me!! i really do think your a internet geek who sits on hes computer all the time picking fights! because you sure as hell dont no cars!!

  • your fucken retarded!! i have a 1969 302 ford falcon and a 1987 Porsche 924 S in my little collection!!! the reason Why i dont like those car is because i they are so fuken expensive, and i could get a 1980's 911 to perform just as good! its people like you that just say oh i like that car because its expensive and in reality have never even seen one in person!!!!

    so tell me i dont know anything, how many engines have you rebuilt?!?!?!

  • "plus mclarens are overrated, i can just tell your a ricer!!" -superchase 08

    Why the hell did you delete that comment?

    Again, how the hell can you tell what kind of person is on the net? I like all cars: Domestics, Imports, Exotics, blah blah.

    You know what, I'll do what your doing - lie and make assumptions:

    Since it seems you keep up to date with your arguments over the internet on a daily basis - you've never been laid and would rather fuck a car.

    Oh, and I've driven the Batmobile.

  • bet iv had more pussy than you have, you would be suprise at how much chicks dig non riced out cars, and considering that i make most of my living through ebay and my email acount thats why i always check my internet. what do you do work at mcdonalds!! lol

    oh and iv drivin Steve mcqueens porsche 917

  • RICE= Racing Inspired Cosmetic Enhancement. "Anything" can be RICE.

    Also, FYI I work at warehouse in SLO, full time worker, I make my living through "hard work" and I'm enlisting into the US Army before 2010.

    I also worked at McDonald's already...when I was 17!

    You sound biased on woman, you act as if all woman are more attracted to Euros. There are ladies out there who prefer imports, domestics, and exotics.

    A woman's taste varies and it's apparent you don't know much about them.

  • PWNED!

  • So you are a ricer! so you work at a brain dead job like lifting boxes all day, didn't you go to college??? and by the way a EURO is an import, Since they import them from Europe!! and back when you were 17 i was already a machinist and have worked in several shops actualy MAKING engine parts!!

  • Brain dead job? you are still making assumptions- if your talking about calculating shipment, scanning products, weighing them in for S&H being a braindead job...then you have no idea what you are talking about.

    Doesn't matter though, a job is a job, and it's respectful enough.

    You are bias as usual. Also, I don 't see how I can be a ricer when my car is 100% "stock". You are 19...when I was 17 you were 14. Wow...a 14y/o machinist.. a lie. Fake.

    Think before you type.

  • you can think its a lie if you want but i grew up on a farm, unlike city people we were tought to work athe the age of 8 i was plowing corn fields when i was 10, and if you have a degree than why dont you use it, or are YOU lieing and didnt finish!

  • I said I took the course, never have I said I "finished" it... due to the shitty economy at the time I had to move elsewhere.

    But truth be told- ANYONE...even a city dweller can be taught to work hard. Common sense. Why do you think I said I earn my living through "Hard Work"? I learned that from my parents growing up.

  • As for college I went to AHC majoring for special effects on MIA.

    I never said Euros are not imports either. I have enough common sense to know whats up.

    Unlike you who can't debate without making assumptions.

    Nuff said.

  • Comment removed

  • Propulsion > Traction

  • the srt ran a 15.36 the driver sux. good srt's should run 12.7 easy

  • you mean 13.7 ... no way is a stock srt-4 gonna do 12's....

  • Lol you guys defending the srt4 make me laugh. It's decent but an mr 2 with upgrades can easily beat vipers on the quarter mile. Consider this, a 1990 mr2 is the same thing as a lotus esprit other than it has a softer suspension and you can get em used for 8 or 9 grand easily. What would you rather drive an srt 4 which is basically a bad attempt at making an affordable tuner or an exotic tuner that is made for the track like mr2\esprit

  • lmfao so many thumbs down for this shitty american car. Yehhh go MR2. Me and my fiance always get these stupid american car's trying to drive faster than us, and we have stock turbo.

  • thats not even a challenge, SRT suck

  • Hands down dont underestimate the Mr2 i personally seen them race against supras and skylines!!!

    Mr2 = Not A Hoe

  • MR2's RULE!!!!!!

  • Hey, I'm British and I've got great teeth and I can masturbate without the need for hand cream. Oh and American cars are a joke in Europe. Underpowered, ugly and no handling.

  • Lol yea matt, why do you think all the people that know stuff about cars in america drive japanese cars? cheap, fun, good quality...anyways you guys r so lucky there ford doesnt suck for you guys. if i lived there i'd be in a brand new focus RS so fasttt also love those fiat 500 abarth, sick little fucker.

  • not at all im american and i drive a 550hp ford f150 Roush. i will smoke you lil jap cars.

  • Gee thats to bad, because i live in the hill country of texas, sorry but you wouldnt ever be able to use that HP on any of the roads i drive- but oh even a Acura Integra has the ability to handle excellently on canyon roads, most likely better than your roush. i don't think i need to say how much more expensive yours is, for the handling you have.

  • British people are uncircumcised and with all the bacteria build up they buttfuck and stick it in their mouth causing them to have horrible teeth did anyone know that?

  • Thats kool i guess. . . sorry, but for whats its worth im from chicago- not Britain.

  • meow

  • that isnt that impressive

  • wow you say srt-4's are rare .....wow dude haha that the ricest stock turbo you can get out here in colorado....its like upgrading 1 step from a civic

  • i knew the MR would win. the MR has better traction Bc of the MR layout but if im not mistaken the SRT4 missed 2nd gear and after that he just didn t try to race

  • you're a fucking bitch and you don't know shit about cars...a stock SRT will smoke you so go suck a dick you fucking bitch before I hunt you down and slit your throat

  • Comment removed

  • SRT-4 driver missed second gear i think... cause for a second he stops accelerating.

  • I respect the SRT 4 but Toyota has made some great rides over the years; Goup B MR2, Supra 3000GT, MR2 Turbo, the mini MR2s, old school classics like the 70s celicas and supras umhm

  • Hummm Hemi Whats so special About a hemi? its innefficient and isn't even a real hemi wow the old hemi is a different story but also were did the hemi come out these are 2 tuner cars no muscle involved

  • fuck toyota...how can you idiots say that toyota is the greatest car company...they are an average car maker and they currently are not making any nice cars...Camry, Corolla, they are all old lady vehicles...Dodge has the Hemi...no company can compete with that..Dodge makes much nicer vehicles right now...and the "NEON" SRT-4 owns

  • you obviously like dick and you do not know shit about cars...Toyota has never even been considered the best cars out there, maybe the ugliest though

  • The people that drive SRTs are the ones that know shit about cars,get pussy and would beat the fuck out of you but anyways...Toyota does not make shit anymore....The Supra and the Celica were the only good looking ones...SRTs are rare, they only made them for 3 years so I like driving a car that not everyone else has...get a real car..fuck Toyota

  • Comment removed

  • MAd cause you seen a Neon lose and you own one. Fag

  • you should have, and the worst part is, the mr2 would whoop the neon even worse in the corners :] good old american. besides, american car companies have to pay a lot more in penions to their old employees than japanese companies, which means they have less money to spend on their cars, which means lower quality

  • Any idiot can mod out a pos car, take this pos toyota for example. Also, any idiot can pick and choose WHICH races to film. Anyone that actually goes to the track knows the SRT-4 smokes 90+% of it's matches. Seems like this car gets as much hate as Porsche since it is superior to the posers.

  • Thats right...you know your shit

  • Jesus that was one slow ass SRT-4 driver!!

  • A stock srt 4 can run a 13.8

  • Thats the one with the limited slip HP oil pan racing oil 100 octane and a pro driver; u and me would best do mid 14s

  • what does that mr2 hAVE DONE TO IT

  • It weighs nothing, has a turbo and a good driver.

  • i ran my eg coupe over this past wknd an went 14.8 @101 and its all motor ls. so i guess i can beat a srt4 lol

  • jap cars rule fuck everything that ant for power n money what other car can u get that can take on a jap!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • My stock 07 Toyota Tunda is just as fast as a stock new Mustang GT!

    Toyota rules!!!

  • true dat!!!

  • I have raced several new mustang gt's and they can never pull away 0 to 60. I have been racing since I got my dl at the age of 16 in 1963! Not much you can tell me that i don't already know about cars!

  • bullshit!!!! i garuntee thats not true.

  • haha wow... the Dodge just got shat on.

  • dodge was stock or some thing fuck toyota

  • Another ignorant retard that thinks dodge is the greatest.

  • Haha you make me laugh. "Fuck Toyota" doesn't make sense. Toyota has been one of the most reliable manufacturers and has some of the best sports cars. The Supra reigns supreme, the MR2 is one of a kind. Oh yeah, and when you say "fuck Toyota" you say "fuck" my car, a '92 MR2 Turbo. So please, I know your ignorant, but keep your useless comments to yourself. NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR OPINION. FACT > OPINION

  • Yeah, Toyota is the best and always will be.

  • No FUCK YOU!!!If you want to suck of some TOYOTA Dick all you have to do is ask..BEEOTCH!!!!

  • dumbass! dodge sucks balls. all dodge car's suck. from sports to suv to trucks. all suck compared to toyota. so smd and GTFO!

  • YOU GO SUCK A FAT ASS DICK!

  • lmao! getting mad because you know it's true? haha wow..how funny.

  • misshift city

  • lol who the fock owns the SRT? a 15.3 is pathetic for a stock SRT. please tell me it has mods so i can laugh even harder. Most people take their stock cars to the track and run 14.7 or better and thats if it's their first time at the track. stock they're capable of 13.9 if your a good driver.

  • yeah . same motor just a better ecu tune netting about 15 more horses .

  • I hear SRT-4's use the same engine and turbo from PT cruizers. Haha.

  • once again proving that srt-4's suck i hate srt-4's all they are are souped up neons thats all they are i dont see whats so great about them

  • ok and a civic can is basicly an integra with the body switched

  • why do idiots feel the need to bash on cars they dont even drive?

    "oh yeah, A civic is basically an integra with the body switched"

    your a sore loser, and this aint even your car

  • Are you fucking serious? Its a completely different car retard.

  • 13 secs is pretty good, The mister slammed the SRT. Both cars have potential but the SRT needs WAY more work to be remotely reliable.... sorry, but its the truth...and its still a NEON

  • both cars are laughably slow

  • one is "slow." the MR2 is pretty quick.

  • hmmm watching the video again, the MR2 isn't too bad at all. I guess I must've been watching a lot of non-ricer drag race videos before this one and it skewed my perspective...

  • and the mr2 could have launched way better . hes in need of a 2 step drag radials and a good lsd . then it would be gnar gnar .