You all need to watch September Clues from 'A' onwards. It explains everything perfectly. 9/11 WAS an inside job. Of that there is no doubt. There's practically NO real footage of 9/11 out there in the media. It was ALL doctored. Oh, and all mobile phone networks went down "because they were so busy", then later "because the mast was atop WTC building 1" (but was seen at the time to still be standing and unhit). So no pics then. Do they think we're stupid?
@LUKE42M He didn't mean people dying and it being a tragedy of a sort but the footage that the stations dubbed as "live" were probably fake since there are multiple angles in which the plain hit the buildings if you look closely.
Quick background: PhD Physics specialising in Aeronautical Engineering - University of Cambridge. Wrote thesis on speed and manoeuvrability at low altitude. I'm running out of comment space, so I'll summarise: I'd like to see evidence of your research into your claims that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a Boeing 767 to achieve that speed at that altitude and that it is IMPOSSIBLE for such an aircraft to burn and melt in the heat of the explosion, burning and collapse.
watch september clues and explain how buildings moved across the screen when the camera was still .. also explain how the Verrazano-Narrows Bridgen floats across the screen when the cameras are still.. i think it must of been a tornado lol....that was sarcasim.. i know you yanks dont pick up on sarcasim so i thought i better explain
alright ill by in. since u wanna just say there was no flight 175. where were u standing in new york that day watchin the towers? I was on the corner of cedar and church street when the second tower was in. where were u when u saw it go in, then tell me it was fake.
yes I did. along with the otehr hundreds of people there. now what people did with the videos is their problem. but they cant fake what really happened.
alright if you are going to use material for ur argument, that a 1-200 TON aluminum boeing moving at well over 500mph cant break threw say 2-3 ton steel beams. lets put this in perspective. you do know what a tornado is made out of right? WIND and yet that still manages to fling cars across a town. if you wanna try the aluminum argument u lost.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah, so why do you no-planers always alter the framerate of the "Divebomb" or other video's when making your false comparisons? Because you're a fraud.
tonydayna i believe on what you investigate...but one question the plane has to engine right..?but it 3:06 look likes right engine is missing...
it is not impossible to edit..
you know what i mean is..
MrEmokids14 3 months ago in playlist More videos from tonydayna
the more i see these kinda videos i get more convinced that is was an inside job.
1975siralex 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You all need to watch September Clues from 'A' onwards. It explains everything perfectly. 9/11 WAS an inside job. Of that there is no doubt. There's practically NO real footage of 9/11 out there in the media. It was ALL doctored. Oh, and all mobile phone networks went down "because they were so busy", then later "because the mast was atop WTC building 1" (but was seen at the time to still be standing and unhit). So no pics then. Do they think we're stupid?
boohoo1902 1 year ago
Comment removed
boohoo1902 1 year ago
@frekeone, are you dumb? People were there to see it. My mom whitnessed it how r u gunna say its fake and shot in hollywood dumbass
LUKE42M 1 year ago
@LUKE42M He didn't mean people dying and it being a tragedy of a sort but the footage that the stations dubbed as "live" were probably fake since there are multiple angles in which the plain hit the buildings if you look closely.
unseendemise 1 year ago
5 different skies: in 40 years they will say it was shot in Hollywood instead of real life recording with 5 different cameras. I just know it.
FrekeOne 1 year ago
It came out from nowere
alamegachris007 1 year ago
ill tell u how its possible: windows 98 and some animation software.
Dave7689 1 year ago
You are an idiot. That is all.
akispines 1 year ago
Quick background: PhD Physics specialising in Aeronautical Engineering - University of Cambridge. Wrote thesis on speed and manoeuvrability at low altitude. I'm running out of comment space, so I'll summarise: I'd like to see evidence of your research into your claims that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a Boeing 767 to achieve that speed at that altitude and that it is IMPOSSIBLE for such an aircraft to burn and melt in the heat of the explosion, burning and collapse.
Awaiting your reply, Dr. L. Breen PhD
Liamgeb92 1 year ago
look at 0:57 look right before it hits the building look right above the plane what is that
mocoproductions343 2 years ago
I noticed that too, jet possibly, but it could just be a glitch in the film
fakeham 2 years ago
k ill debunk this. it will only take some common knoledge and a sketch. lemme get back to u.
911letsroll 2 years ago
watch september clues and explain how buildings moved across the screen when the camera was still .. also explain how the Verrazano-Narrows Bridgen floats across the screen when the cameras are still.. i think it must of been a tornado lol....that was sarcasim.. i know you yanks dont pick up on sarcasim so i thought i better explain
smoketweed09 2 years ago
what the hell are you talking about?
tonydayna 2 years ago
Photoshopping and image manipulation.. He's agreeing with you.
andy7666 2 years ago
@tonydayna look up what he said and maybe you would know dumbass
ZabeHon 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ctasker5 2 years ago
@Ctasker5 what are you talking about, lmfao you dumbass.
ZabeHon 1 year ago
911letsroll, go debunk the science-proven nanothermite found in the debris.
planes on 911,lol, ive seen them clearly on cnn1111111111
911letsroll, stfu, go sit in the corner.
i hope youll enjoy the food n fences at fema real estate.
311ftw 2 years ago
alright ill by in. since u wanna just say there was no flight 175. where were u standing in new york that day watchin the towers? I was on the corner of cedar and church street when the second tower was in. where were u when u saw it go in, then tell me it was fake.
911letsroll 2 years ago
Let me get this str8, ur saying without a shadow of a doubt, you saw fl. 175 impact and slice threw the tower?
tonydayna 2 years ago
yes I did. along with the otehr hundreds of people there. now what people did with the videos is their problem. but they cant fake what really happened.
911letsroll 2 years ago
your a lier, a aluminum boeing can not melt into a steel and concrete building like that fuck you
tonydayna 2 years ago
alright if you are going to use material for ur argument, that a 1-200 TON aluminum boeing moving at well over 500mph cant break threw say 2-3 ton steel beams. lets put this in perspective. you do know what a tornado is made out of right? WIND and yet that still manages to fling cars across a town. if you wanna try the aluminum argument u lost.
911letsroll 2 years ago
boeings can not fly at 500+ mph at sea level, its impossible, its not realistic.
tonydayna 2 years ago
also if you want to attack me. "attack me with logic"
911letsroll 2 years ago
this video is my proof are you blind watch again'
tonydayna 2 years ago
bravo bravo.
excellent video. i want to see somebody debunk that!
19wrestler 2 years ago
thanks man seriously....<3
tonydayna 2 years ago
No Editing here - All we want is real footage of the pentagon strike, and we MIGHT believe the official Story-
tonydayna 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah, so why do you no-planers always alter the framerate of the "Divebomb" or other video's when making your false comparisons? Because you're a fraud.
Xenomorph911WTC 3 years ago
and whats you proff?
goodnoah 2 years ago
I'm impressed Xenomorph911WTC.
Debunking moron twoofer theories that EVERYONE knows are a joke.
911morontwoofer 2 years ago