Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Report a Rabbi raping a 12 year old girl, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    Stop a Jew picking your pocket, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    Catch a Jew in the act of embezzling money, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    Discover an Israeli spy in the pentagon, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    If you're against releasing Jonathan Pollard, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    Criticize anything at all about Israeli policies, YOU'RE AN ANTI-SEMITE!

    Any questions?

  • @dgl1962 Why must there be labels? Its a person, not a Jew, or Israeli, we are individuals. Maybe it is your rhetoric that makes people think you are an anti-Semite.

    Although I do know the Israeli government and the Zionists use that as a tactic to hush people up about their injustices but I don't think its all of them dude. Relax...ITS A MASSIVE JEWISH CONSPIRACY OH NO THEY ARE POISONING THE WELLS AGAIN!

  • @Martial024 We will most certainly NOT relax as long as we have the US government hijacked by israeli's and their sycophants.

    Why don't you ask the zionists why they constantly use labels that vilify anyone who criticizes our sick association with Israel as being a "bigot" or an "anti-Semite"?

    Once you get them to cease using that silly tactic, we'll stop using blanket condemnations of that horribly racist tribe in the Israeli government.

  • @dgl1962 did i fucked your mother?

  • @garaion Did you "taked" English

     in school"?

  • 1:30-2:30

    Four words: "What's your question, ma'am?"

  • He seems logical in his reasoning but I do disagree with him on changing our foreign policy in regards to the countries he mentioned. We should persuade our allies to have more democratic policies but we shouldn't abandon them, thats what the terrorist want.

  • @aznsbd We should abandon them while we're behind though. Were broke.

  • So Sheuer is saying terrorism is only a military problem? Yet it is our foreign policy both political and military and perhaps cultural that is driving terrorism. He is a huge bundle of contradictions. Just try to decipher his essays on the web for goodness sake.

  • that first one was a moonbat although she has a point.

  • "bringing oil over in the 1800's or 1900's"

    You dumb cunt.

    We used to be the worlds largest oil exporter up until the 50's.

  • @ReliableInsider

    While I agree with you on an idealistic level, I think a lot of his arguments stem from an admission of USA hubris on his part. I think he'd argue that the limits of our purse and power are reached.

    Without fighting a war of extermination, we lack good military options. AND we're bribing a bunch of despots currently, just to keep lids on various nations.

    When you remove a despot things get hinky quick.

    His position seems to be well thought out and mechanistic.

  • @ReliableInsider

    Sure, you can make idealistic comments but how do we turn your fantasies into reality?

  • What is the point of having a goal that can't be accomplished in less than 24 hours?

    The point is that, without goals, you're just stumbling in circles.

    I don't care if it takes 3,000 years to spread democracy to some countries. I don't care if it takes 300 years to turn the Muslim world 100% against the idea of targeting terroristic violence against innocent civilians. I and my descendants are willing to keep working for as long as it takes.

    Quitters should not get into government.

  • Do you think that these Iraqis are really truly deep down made because of our support for Israel, or do they react to it because they are essentially an oil-producing colony that has nothing.

    Do you think that you would be a more a hostile person if you didn't have water and soap to wash your smelly balls off?

  • How?

    Unless I'm missing something, that's what foreign policy IS: it is working to make everyone else in this tiny elevator car we call Earth less violent and healthier so they can buy our stuff.

    We do it using violence as a LAST resort.

  • Then you have to cut the middle-man out of the oil business and make sure our oil dollar goes back to the citizens that live there.

    Not middle-men in London, traders on Wall-Street or Tyrannical governments that are only enabled because of that petro dollar.

  • I have no idea why people think foreign policy requires money. Republicans are used to buying everything instead of working. The way foreign policy should work is that we

    1. understand other countries and cultures and figure out everything they're doing that is idiotic, and

    2. convince them that there is a better way.

    I'm not really answering your rude question because I'm not giving specifics.

    There is no ideology that fits every foreign policy question.

  • I agree.

    That is why Scheuer says we need to leave and let them work it out themselves but we won't leave because we need the oil and Israel has essentially commandeered U.S. Army resources to expand and defend it's own borders.

    It's not about Jews and Muslims, it's about haves and have nots.

  • Human beings are pig-headed and self-destructive and governments are even moreso.

    But opportunities arise to assist nations that want to make great leaps forward toward democracy and we have to be watching every single one of them 365 days a year to catch those opportunities.

    What's your approach?

  • I say leave and worry about our own country.

    If we don't take of our own house then we won't be here to rescue anybody when it's really necessary.

    Right now we are suppressing poor people at the Behest of rich Wall-Street jews who own our government.

    Agree?

    If you were worried about improving the lot of the world, why not start with Haiti instead of defending rich, wealthy israel from poor people?

  • This isolationist unilateralism was so apparent during the Bush era (spitting on international convention, blowing off climate change summits) and it all goes back to oil. If we remove oil dependancy, we solve the problem and those sand people can cover their desert in their own blood in the name of their sand god for the next hundred years.

  • its more than the oil. its the relation between oil and dollar stability. Another problem is nsc 68. Google it. another problem is iran china and india and russia gaining ground as a trade and commerce and strategic giant in the shanghai cooperation organisation. google it. Thats why the US is spilling the blood of its youth. google the names: Engdahl. Galtung. Tom Dispatch. Chalmers Johnson. Galloway. Scheuer is a disgusting utilitarian psychopath. perfect cold blooded "lemay" type psychopath.

  • You couldn't have briefly told me what nsc68 is? Dammit I have to take my education into my own hands as usual haha.

  • ;-) trust me its worth the research. IT blew me off the planet when i discovered the meaning and scope and currency of it. the US is fucked really. And all this talk is superfluous. Its like you're as broke as ever and in debt but have the most ostentatious and lavish lifestyle. And all you really know how to do is offer other people armed protection in exchange for cash cuz you're a huge crazy dude with a huge history of violence so they believe you with the job. Now your entire family

  • is sitting at home mainly concerned with creating new weapons for you and waiting for you to bring in that blood money from your protection jobs to pay for goods and services. For that money and revenue: you regularly kill. It comes with the job. And who are your customers? You are protecting dictators who pay you in cheap oil aswell as democracies who drop white phosphorus on their marginalized populations. Now all of a sudden, some of the people you killed show up like: "blooooooowbaaaack"

  • jumping on planes and making the world an uncomfortable place for you and bringing the pain back to your front door... the pain is so mental one of your own sons looses it and pulls a fort hood shoot em up for all to see how effed up your job and blood money is... you don't get it and increase the killing abroad. Well... lets just wait and see. there will be more foreign anger and more domestic jack in the box type of effects from all this increasing of death abroad. not to speak of the economy

  • It's silly to blame oil for America's behaviour.

    Even without oil the US would still seek to dominate the Middle East simply due to its geographic/strategic position.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more