Added: 3 years ago
From: PSSL01
Views: 20,015
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • personaly i think the 800s are better thatn the 1000s they read mad burned cds

  • that is way cool. it's kind of like a record player but it works with cds. haha i want one.

  • I gotta get this!

  • is the 800 better than the 400??

  • @TheRraavveenn no, the 400 is much more complex and updated than the 800. It has so much more effects and things you can do. The 400 is also usb compatible

  • i love the pitch control button i use it all the time

  • is the frequency response of 4hz-20,000hz at plus-minus 3db for the cdj-800mk2 ? anyone?

  • cannot mix at all ofcourse;)

  • haha well guy below me today i get my 2 pioneers cdj800mk2 and i'll rock with it til i die haha..and btw there are the best dj's who dont use fancy stuff but do quite standard mixing..fancy stuff is used when you can mix at all in my opinion..

  • The CDJ1000's are far better, well worth another £200. You get "wave display" on the screen of the 1000 so you have some idea where the loud and quiet bits are. Also, you get 6% 10% 16% and 100% pitch on the cdj1000, 6% is good for music like trance... 16% gives you a lot to play with, but is still relatively accurate... 100% is only really useful for deck FX, gettin the crowd going by slowing tracks down and throwing it back in etc...

    CDJ 800 fine for standard mixing, not for advanced.

  • What is the price on this one?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more