Contracts

[GinkoArtEtc]

／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼

[evanbr7456]

Not really detrimental reliance. Get tort damages instead Charlie.

[SheSaidTeAmo]

I love random law videos :D haha

[CatooftheRepublic]

SECTION 90 promissory estopple. Now go sue her for your detrimental reliance.

[timestandingstill]

I love this video! LOL

[imnoobish]

sue that bitch!

[TheInnkeeper7]

@Stevyed85 shut up its a cartoon

[DestinedFateX]

◕‿‿◕

[stevyd85]

The only way Charlie could sue would be a on a promissory estoppel theory. There was no consideration given by Charlie in exchange for the girl's promise not to pull the ball away. Thus, all Charlie had was the gratuitous promise of the girl, damages for the non-performance of which usually cannot be had, except for when there is detrimental reliance upon the promise (as in this case).

[Rayven10]

Actually, if a contract is signed by all parties involved in the matter, it becomes a legal document. It doesn't have to be notarized at all. Most contracts aren't. In the video, assuming that was a legal contract, she violated her contract obligations, and he would have the right to sue for damages for breech of contract.

Go get her Charlie!

[maggie2006stl]

Aww! And I have a contracts final on Friday I should be studying for. Funny, we never covered this.