This penalty kick was not controversial at all!!! Watch carefully when the goalkeeper went out, he punched that chinese player IN THE FACE!!!!! Just imagine if you ware that poor guy, what would you be??? He was diagnosed to have a cerebral concussion!!! This goalkeeper is a complete BASTARD!!!
@zhang28155 eh small eyes, I don't care what happened to that China player(I admit, i wud have blacked out to it if was me) but as far as calling the Singapore gk a bastard is just irrational and childish. LOOK CLOSELY, the gk mistimed his punch(yes, he wanted to punch the ball not the china player) So it was not intentional but more of a mistimed action.
@Chaos126 Hey, are you saying that if I accidentally stabbed in your belly,I don't have to bear any penalty??? Although the gk wanted to punch the ball, you could not ignore the fact that the Chinese player was punched in the face!!! Should you keep that in your mind, you were not the man who had a cerebral concussion, you can say whatever you want.
@zhang28155 what am i spose to do then? retaliate? Just go to the hospital uh. Yeah okay ur best fren got punched in the face by the gk whatever BUT BUT BUTT it was mistimed! we are all human. asian football is not high class like the bpl you know.
@Chaos126 Using your words: "LOOK CLOSELY",I found again that the goalkeeper indeed is a BASTARD. That ball was already headed by the Chinese player before that gk came to him, so the punch was completely an intentional action. LOOK CLOSELY, small eyes.
@Chaos126 LOOK CLOSELY, that BASTARD was not punching at the ball at all!!! He intentionally punched at that poor guy's face and besides, LOOK CLOSELY, he was also trying to kick that guy at the same time. WHAT A BASTARD!
@zhang28155 the kick was the follow up reaction to his mistimed punch. Don't tell you want to jump but your legs don't move. Huh? You some chinese levitator er wad?
@qiansu2001: the pot calling the kettle black. think about china's pathetic dream first :p giant china had to count on a rubbish referee to win singapore~ PWNED.
scw1604 , akuNoobGile Be serious! You can't deny that China was very much the superior team. The lions had hardly any possession (midfield non-existent) and whenever the defenders received the ball they do then what they always do - pump the long ball up. No options. No creativity. No off the ball movements.They are playing the 70's game, aren't they? Either it's the coach's instruction or I think, the lions play with an inferiority complex. Go back to the drawing board! -Iraq game? Same old..
@MrBlueMonday Oh please. Did i ever deny that China was better than Singapore? I said that China did not deserve the second penalty, well if you played enough football, u know im right. Secondly, China is ranked 69th, while Singapore is ranked 129th. For a country that is ranked 69th, China suck big time. I've seen countries that are ranked 120th play better than China
WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED
@zzgoodzzsg robbed of what? count y-our lucky stars that the scoreline had been moderate enough not to have caused us any footballing nightmares. Robbed? Get real!
@MrBlueMonday WE were robbed by the referee of a win in china. count y-our lucky stars that the scoreline had been 2-1 to china, enough not to have caused the world any footballing nightmares. China cant lose!!! they are just too powerful too strong and if they lose , it will be the end of the world.
@MrBlueMonday Yes, but singapore not being among the asian powerhouses is not the main topic here. i was just saying that singapore did not deserved to lose in this particular game because of the referee, didnt you watched the game? So what if Singapore is not among the best? Havent you heard of the underdogs winning because they really put in hardwork?
@zzgoodzzsg give credit when due. A draw without the given penalty will do china NO JUSTICE. Whether Singapore deserve to loose - was it solely on that indiscreet whistle that pointed to the penalty spot? Or were you oblivious to the vast discrepancy relevant to the performances of these 2 teams for the entire 90 minutes? Disappointed, no? Are we still playing the 70's game? Playing the archaic LONG BALLS and see for yourself if Singapore managed 6 passes average.
@MrBlueMonday It is china's fault that they didnt take their chances and sometimes luck do play a part in games like this. So what if china dominated the game and create many chances? Does this mean that they HAVE to win? For your information, singapore were leading 1-0 when the controversial penalty was awarded to china and singapore was actually holding out very strongly, until...
@zzgoodzzsg NO prejudice here. Just saying that the Lions need to reflect on their brand of football and rectify the resulted outcome, which is the lost :2-1 to China.
Then - not forgetting to Iraq by 0-2. Same old..same old...
It is not that hard to acknowledge one's disappointment admit-tingly and be reflective in changing what don't work.
@MrBlueMonday Well, Singapore did play the passing and possesion in attack during the game against malaysia. They actually tried to adopt the style of football very well. However, during the game against china and iraq, Hariss Harun was absent and this prompted the players to launch long balls to Duric's height advantage.
I am sure that when Hariss returns, there will be a much smoother play in terms of going forward as hariss is a very important player who can penetrate the defence line.
The goal keeper was lucky, he deserves a red card. Try to find a clip on how Drogba has been knocked out in the premier league, very similar to this one.
I feel really sorry about many singapore people who made comments here, they do not care about soccer and probably they never know what is soccer. All they care about is their pathetic dream and so called national pride that tiny singapore may defeat giant China.
Take care guys, we will meet you again in singapore and wipe you guys out.
@qiansu2001 firstly, its football not soccer. Secondly, since you know so much about football, im sure u will agree that China did not deserve the second penalty as there wasn't enough contact to be given the penalty. Thirdly, im rather disappointed after watching the game as China is ranked 69th but they play like countries that are ranked 130th. I think countries like Thailand that is ranked 120th play better than your Country
The first penalty was clearly unfair. China's striker hit on the ball before Lionel knocked onto him. I guess it is natural for a goalkeeper to go forward and save the ball.
i guess the china ref was bribe? btw the china coach was José Camacho he coached real madrid in 2004 and china pay him 3 million euro juz for him to coach the china team btw i think china bribe the ref anyway its was a really nice game and the lion still have chance versusing jordan and iraq hope they could win or do something about it
The singaporeans on this thread are pathetic. You lost, man up, quit bitching about China buying the ref, or that it has a large population. Anybody who knows anything about football would know the two penalties were correctly awarded, although the second one was soft I admit. On chances created, China definitely created more, based on that they deserve to win.
@Nyro888 deserving to win and being the winner are two different things. look at arsenal. One can say that after their numerous chances and ample possession they should have won the premiership but did they? one could just say that they didnt take their chances well, and that could be said about China in this match. Look at the tackle on Duric just inside the box, if the second penalty can be awarded to China, i believe that should be a penalty, albeit like you say Soft. What say you?
@legolasrocker Are you an Arsenal fan? I am btw and I can tell you that my beloved gunners didn't create enough chances and had pretty ordinary defenses, which is why they can't win the premier league. You're right in saying that deserving to win and being the winner are different, but in this case the Chinese did play better, and did just enough to win. Hence they won and deserved it.
@legolasrocker as for the singaporean penalty, I've yet to see it, so I can't really say if it should have been awarded. But if it was a definite penalty and the ref's vision wasn't obstructed, then you can say the ref robbed you of the game. If it was 50-50, well then you're just unlucky. Still I understand if you feel injustice from the ref's decisions, as 2-1 isn't a big scoreline. Though you should just look forward to the next game. Good luck!
stop whining my fellow singaporeans..the lions did well...and yeah,the ref is a dickhead obviously-_- awarding penalties which are not even penalties..the lions desrve to win..DONT be like the malaysian fans guys...they whine like dogs-_- all we can do is support our beloved lions for thier game against lraq.:) let show the lions the support they deserve at jbs :)
@amirmoriable Haha your man doesn't have any different than us. Now you can understand the feeling when one team win with the pathetic style (just like Singapore did to Malaysia, being hypocrite all the time on the match). I hate the fact your team willing to do any shit just for win. No sportmanship at all.
@fantasyunion thats all part of the game man,by being a fan of course you back your team up and support them(and at least we dont deface any countries flag,booing at their national anthem)#just saying and .yeah,of course you get mad as a player if you have those refs in your game too..you would do that too right if you were in the players shoes?seeing bad calls from the refs.sorry to be rude or anything man,im just expressing my views. peace.
This is no doubt a penalty and I agree there were contact on the 2nd China penalty as well...
BUT WHEN THE CHINA DEFENDER BROUGHT DOWN AD INSIDE THE BOX, IT WAS A PENALTY...I DON'T KNOW WHY BOTH REFEREE AND ASSISTANT DID NOT GIVE IT...
ANYBODY GOT THE VIDEO OF THAT INCIDENT? SUGGEST WE BROADCAST IT OVER YOUTUBE WITH REPLAY AGAIN AND AGAIN, SINCE THE CHINESE DARE NOT REPLAY IT ON LIVE TV
WHAT A BLOODY SHAME, A BIG COUNTRY LIKE CHINA NEED A FAVOR FROM THE REFEREE TO BEAT A SMALL COUNTRY...
@scw1604 There was contact on the 2nd China penalty. But it was the softest penalty I have ever seen! There were almost no grounds for a penalty, and if it WAS indeed a penalty (which is WASN'T) then Singapore should have been awarded one as well...
It is a great save by Lionel. Excellent save! Well done, Singapore!
We lost the game to the referee not China. We should put our head high up as we are playing against 12 players on the pitch and not 11. If China did not score the second penalty, a third penalty is likely to be given. No bad feeling.... the second penalty is a gift, I think the China players know about it. Overall, there is not much threat from the China team.
look at those 2 trolling down below. who gives a damn. this game is long over!
wanzification 2 weeks ago
Miss lewis :( wish he could play for the national team again:(
awieready 1 month ago
mt minds probably just in the gutter but at first i heard "it is a penalty...vagina" 0:20
odabi13 1 month ago
we love you lewis for punching the bloody idiot in the face.
PigsArseifyYou 2 months ago
ألله أكبر
wwefan12372 2 months ago
padan muka korang. Tulah lain kali jgn pakai pemain tiruan.....hAHAHAHAH
azmil940201 2 months ago
Good that Singapore lose.
shangnui 3 months ago
@shangnui _|_
Thequakeboy12 3 months ago 6
This penalty kick was not controversial at all!!! Watch carefully when the goalkeeper went out, he punched that chinese player IN THE FACE!!!!! Just imagine if you ware that poor guy, what would you be??? He was diagnosed to have a cerebral concussion!!! This goalkeeper is a complete BASTARD!!!
zhang28155 3 months ago
@zhang28155 the other penalty was a controversial one douchebag -.-
benny1boy8 3 months ago 7
@zhang28155 eh small eyes, I don't care what happened to that China player(I admit, i wud have blacked out to it if was me) but as far as calling the Singapore gk a bastard is just irrational and childish. LOOK CLOSELY, the gk mistimed his punch(yes, he wanted to punch the ball not the china player) So it was not intentional but more of a mistimed action.
Chaos126 2 months ago
@Chaos126 Hey, are you saying that if I accidentally stabbed in your belly,I don't have to bear any penalty??? Although the gk wanted to punch the ball, you could not ignore the fact that the Chinese player was punched in the face!!! Should you keep that in your mind, you were not the man who had a cerebral concussion, you can say whatever you want.
zhang28155 2 months ago
@zhang28155 what am i spose to do then? retaliate? Just go to the hospital uh. Yeah okay ur best fren got punched in the face by the gk whatever BUT BUT BUTT it was mistimed! we are all human. asian football is not high class like the bpl you know.
Chaos126 2 months ago
@Chaos126 Using your words: "LOOK CLOSELY",I found again that the goalkeeper indeed is a BASTARD. That ball was already headed by the Chinese player before that gk came to him, so the punch was completely an intentional action. LOOK CLOSELY, small eyes.
zhang28155 2 months ago
@zhang28155 haha you make me laugh. again you heard of the word mistimed. Mistimed.
Chaos126 2 months ago
@Chaos126 LOOK CLOSELY, that BASTARD was not punching at the ball at all!!! He intentionally punched at that poor guy's face and besides, LOOK CLOSELY, he was also trying to kick that guy at the same time. WHAT A BASTARD!
zhang28155 2 months ago
@zhang28155 the kick was the follow up reaction to his mistimed punch. Don't tell you want to jump but your legs don't move. Huh? You some chinese levitator er wad?
Get a life.
Chaos126 2 months ago
referee always doesn't go in singapore way D:
MrLegendman13 3 months ago 8
haizz... MrBlueMonday confirm 100% + CHOP! one china dick face.. fucking china... i wonder why they come singapore -.- ....
TheMyLasT1 3 months ago 11
talk so much for what u go kick la -.-
DeathHunter1990 5 months ago 2
@DeathHunter1990 whats your problem? people got ask you meh? CCB...
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 34
Comment removed
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@qiansu2001: the pot calling the kettle black. think about china's pathetic dream first :p giant china had to count on a rubbish referee to win singapore~ PWNED.
Poysen89 5 months ago
scw1604 , akuNoobGile Be serious! You can't deny that China was very much the superior team. The lions had hardly any possession (midfield non-existent) and whenever the defenders received the ball they do then what they always do - pump the long ball up. No options. No creativity. No off the ball movements.They are playing the 70's game, aren't they? Either it's the coach's instruction or I think, the lions play with an inferiority complex. Go back to the drawing board! -Iraq game? Same old..
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@MrBlueMonday Oh please. Did i ever deny that China was better than Singapore? I said that China did not deserve the second penalty, well if you played enough football, u know im right. Secondly, China is ranked 69th, while Singapore is ranked 129th. For a country that is ranked 69th, China suck big time. I've seen countries that are ranked 120th play better than China
akuNoobGile 5 months ago 32
even spore lost to china and iraq spore still a very good team and hv good players..go lions
peswenworld 5 months ago
he punched the china face
isadinped 5 months ago
Legendary!
ts4lecho 5 months ago
1:48 , Lionel said : I'm gonna save your kick man . Don't think you're china i'm scared .
Awhh he did it ! :D awesome job lionel
syafiqpilot 5 months ago
WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBEDWE WERE ROBBED WE WERE ROBBED
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 62
@zzgoodzzsg robbed of what? count y-our lucky stars that the scoreline had been moderate enough not to have caused us any footballing nightmares. Robbed? Get real!
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@MrBlueMonday WE were robbed by the referee of a win in china. count y-our lucky stars that the scoreline had been 2-1 to china, enough not to have caused the world any footballing nightmares. China cant lose!!! they are just too powerful too strong and if they lose , it will be the end of the world.
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 10
@zzgoodzzsg very immature... admit that Singapore is not among the league of the Asian Powerhouses when football is concerned.
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@MrBlueMonday Yes, but singapore not being among the asian powerhouses is not the main topic here. i was just saying that singapore did not deserved to lose in this particular game because of the referee, didnt you watched the game? So what if Singapore is not among the best? Havent you heard of the underdogs winning because they really put in hardwork?
Disappointing, you calling yourself immature...
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 51
@zzgoodzzsg give credit when due. A draw without the given penalty will do china NO JUSTICE. Whether Singapore deserve to loose - was it solely on that indiscreet whistle that pointed to the penalty spot? Or were you oblivious to the vast discrepancy relevant to the performances of these 2 teams for the entire 90 minutes? Disappointed, no? Are we still playing the 70's game? Playing the archaic LONG BALLS and see for yourself if Singapore managed 6 passes average.
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@MrBlueMonday It is china's fault that they didnt take their chances and sometimes luck do play a part in games like this. So what if china dominated the game and create many chances? Does this mean that they HAVE to win? For your information, singapore were leading 1-0 when the controversial penalty was awarded to china and singapore was actually holding out very strongly, until...
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 39
@zzgoodzzsg NO prejudice here. Just saying that the Lions need to reflect on their brand of football and rectify the resulted outcome, which is the lost :2-1 to China.
Then - not forgetting to Iraq by 0-2. Same old..same old...
It is not that hard to acknowledge one's disappointment admit-tingly and be reflective in changing what don't work.
MrBlueMonday 5 months ago
@MrBlueMonday Well, Singapore did play the passing and possesion in attack during the game against malaysia. They actually tried to adopt the style of football very well. However, during the game against china and iraq, Hariss Harun was absent and this prompted the players to launch long balls to Duric's height advantage.
I am sure that when Hariss returns, there will be a much smoother play in terms of going forward as hariss is a very important player who can penetrate the defence line.
zzgoodzzsg 5 months ago 39
Great punch!
WWErockes 5 months ago
Qiu Bo dislike this video...... :P
ahmadtankfbz 5 months ago
Good job lionel. :)
SuperFootball1994 5 months ago
The goal keeper was lucky, he deserves a red card. Try to find a clip on how Drogba has been knocked out in the premier league, very similar to this one.
I feel really sorry about many singapore people who made comments here, they do not care about soccer and probably they never know what is soccer. All they care about is their pathetic dream and so called national pride that tiny singapore may defeat giant China.
Take care guys, we will meet you again in singapore and wipe you guys out.
qiansu2001 5 months ago
@qiansu2001 firstly, its football not soccer. Secondly, since you know so much about football, im sure u will agree that China did not deserve the second penalty as there wasn't enough contact to be given the penalty. Thirdly, im rather disappointed after watching the game as China is ranked 69th but they play like countries that are ranked 130th. I think countries like Thailand that is ranked 120th play better than your Country
akuNoobGile 5 months ago 7
The first penalty was clearly unfair. China's striker hit on the ball before Lionel knocked onto him. I guess it is natural for a goalkeeper to go forward and save the ball.
MoonlitVision 6 months ago
@MoonlitVision joking? man, save the ball? the ball had gone away. learn the rules befor comment
fk6268 5 months ago
Super kelong ref so obvious 2 penelties given to 1 team 2 penelties denied to the other a joke of an official.
SilverSeraph83 6 months ago
Kelong till bo wei gong !
IGNlTlON 6 months ago
i guess the china ref was bribe? btw the china coach was José Camacho he coached real madrid in 2004 and china pay him 3 million euro juz for him to coach the china team btw i think china bribe the ref anyway its was a really nice game and the lion still have chance versusing jordan and iraq hope they could win or do something about it
133423q 6 months ago
LOL lionel punched him in the face...good job
TheDogh8ter 6 months ago
Singapore DID NOT deserve to lose like this..enough said.
JJJJJJJJ6666 6 months ago
The singaporeans on this thread are pathetic. You lost, man up, quit bitching about China buying the ref, or that it has a large population. Anybody who knows anything about football would know the two penalties were correctly awarded, although the second one was soft I admit. On chances created, China definitely created more, based on that they deserve to win.
Nyro888 6 months ago
@Nyro888 deserving to win and being the winner are two different things. look at arsenal. One can say that after their numerous chances and ample possession they should have won the premiership but did they? one could just say that they didnt take their chances well, and that could be said about China in this match. Look at the tackle on Duric just inside the box, if the second penalty can be awarded to China, i believe that should be a penalty, albeit like you say Soft. What say you?
legolasrocker 6 months ago
@legolasrocker Are you an Arsenal fan? I am btw and I can tell you that my beloved gunners didn't create enough chances and had pretty ordinary defenses, which is why they can't win the premier league. You're right in saying that deserving to win and being the winner are different, but in this case the Chinese did play better, and did just enough to win. Hence they won and deserved it.
Nyro888 6 months ago
@legolasrocker as for the singaporean penalty, I've yet to see it, so I can't really say if it should have been awarded. But if it was a definite penalty and the ref's vision wasn't obstructed, then you can say the ref robbed you of the game. If it was 50-50, well then you're just unlucky. Still I understand if you feel injustice from the ref's decisions, as 2-1 isn't a big scoreline. Though you should just look forward to the next game. Good luck!
Nyro888 6 months ago
stop whining my fellow singaporeans..the lions did well...and yeah,the ref is a dickhead obviously-_- awarding penalties which are not even penalties..the lions desrve to win..DONT be like the malaysian fans guys...they whine like dogs-_- all we can do is support our beloved lions for thier game against lraq.:) let show the lions the support they deserve at jbs :)
amirmoriable 6 months ago
@amirmoriable Haha your man doesn't have any different than us. Now you can understand the feeling when one team win with the pathetic style (just like Singapore did to Malaysia, being hypocrite all the time on the match). I hate the fact your team willing to do any shit just for win. No sportmanship at all.
fantasyunion 6 months ago
@fantasyunion thats all part of the game man,by being a fan of course you back your team up and support them(and at least we dont deface any countries flag,booing at their national anthem)#just saying and .yeah,of course you get mad as a player if you have those refs in your game too..you would do that too right if you were in the players shoes?seeing bad calls from the refs.sorry to be rude or anything man,im just expressing my views. peace.
amirmoriable 6 months ago
Can someone edit the photo of the Ref and put him in a china jersey?
SuperFootball1994 6 months ago
@SuperFootball1994 yeah. we were robbed
galaxypegasisw105r2f 6 months ago
China will do anything to get whatever they want, they can get their farmers to play and just buy off the ref
xavierclement77 6 months ago
WTF! Louis is not goal keeper, but a boxer! Did he want to kill the chinese foward?
mach2k1949 6 months ago
who is the white guy?
gogiet 6 months ago
This is no doubt a penalty and I agree there were contact on the 2nd China penalty as well...
BUT WHEN THE CHINA DEFENDER BROUGHT DOWN AD INSIDE THE BOX, IT WAS A PENALTY...I DON'T KNOW WHY BOTH REFEREE AND ASSISTANT DID NOT GIVE IT...
ANYBODY GOT THE VIDEO OF THAT INCIDENT? SUGGEST WE BROADCAST IT OVER YOUTUBE WITH REPLAY AGAIN AND AGAIN, SINCE THE CHINESE DARE NOT REPLAY IT ON LIVE TV
WHAT A BLOODY SHAME, A BIG COUNTRY LIKE CHINA NEED A FAVOR FROM THE REFEREE TO BEAT A SMALL COUNTRY...
scw1604 6 months ago 6
@scw1604 There was contact on the 2nd China penalty. But it was the softest penalty I have ever seen! There were almost no grounds for a penalty, and if it WAS indeed a penalty (which is WASN'T) then Singapore should have been awarded one as well...
LKC9215 6 months ago
The referee is fucking biased. Please lodge a complaint.
Referee 2 : 1 singapore
SuperFootball1994 6 months ago
It is a great save by Lionel. Excellent save! Well done, Singapore!
We lost the game to the referee not China. We should put our head high up as we are playing against 12 players on the pitch and not 11. If China did not score the second penalty, a third penalty is likely to be given. No bad feeling.... the second penalty is a gift, I think the China players know about it. Overall, there is not much threat from the China team.
Team Singapore - We can make it.
tanstg 6 months ago
woaaaa
dellyjolly 6 months ago