Added: 3 years ago
From: steveboston11
Views: 14,342
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Well it goes without saying that the rotor has to be powered when the thing is hovering or flying slowly. That is why I didn't say it.

  • "Once airborne, power could be removed from the rotor leaving a wing-plus-autogyro commuter aircraft."

    No that can only be done when it is actually moving forward. Hovering still requires the rotors to be powered.

  • Really nice Sim of a quite obscure subject.

  • I am sure we could make this far better these days with modern tech. The same goes for the old idea of tilting the whole wing so the engines can point straight up (or the V22 method where just the engines tilt). We could also do another SST more easily, and another Space Shuttle. Many things like this would be easier to do so why don't we? I think the reason is the modern public liability/health& safety environment plus the cost (nobody works for a few pounds/bucks a day in the west anymore.

  • if the british were to update the old plane it would be quiter ,use less fuel.

  • Klasse Video, klasse Flieger :-)

  • where i can download it?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more