can we finally get rid of bullshit religion now? please, pretty please.... iif any higher power exists I can guarantee it's nothing. like the ahole the bible is about... grow up...
@RzaChess Aye, it's properly known as "theoretical physics". The math is generally rigorously reviewed; but that takes us only so far. We lack the tools (currently!) to make observations, in regards to many of the propositions, for proper empirical falsifiability.
In other realities we are ALL immortal, Universe ruling, God pleasure beings near infinite times over. Yep, I like that theory. That said, in an almost infinite number we are living existences of extreme misery, far worse than anything we could Humanly conceive. This crude example, when we try & take in the infinite realms & bear in mind a possible level of interconnectedness between the Multiverse, perhaps this hints at reasons as to our occasionsal feelings of fragility and sheer awe at being?
all particles were formed at the moment of the BB, after 400 000 years the Universe became opaque enough for radiation to spread, creating the Cosmic Background radiation which we can detect.
LOL @ the ammount of people on here thinking that parallel universes would have them on it but different...this is science, not the fuckin twilight zone...by parallel they mean side by side
@ItsKnucklez Well I'm glad we have such steadfast beacons of knowledge as yourself to look toward! Humans know bugger all in the scheme of things, so "LOL" at you! :) Our greatest scientific minds know next to nothing about the true workings of the Universe - these are questions akin to "Does God exist?" - don't get too cocky about the little we DO know!
@andy7666 If science knew how everything worked, we wouldn't need it anymore... I know science doesn't have all the answers, if it did, it wouldn't be science. Like the fact that most of the universe is made of dark matter, but they don't know what dark matter IS, but they are working on it. You missed my point, I was simply laughing at people not knowing what "parallel" means.
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
FallofDarkness wrote "from primeval science to modern science...I've done heavy research on M-theory and understand all the scientific history behind it."
Considering the theory was only first proposed in 1995 and remains completely untestable, your above claim is ridiculous.
@Galmozzi99 If you did real research on M-theory and understood the history of it (from primeval science to modern science) maybe you wouldn't regard M-theory as a desperate attempt to explain everything. I've done heavy research on M-theory and understand all the scientific history behind it. So from my point of view you're being willfully ignorant!
@FallofDarkness55 String like a rope.That has been threaded.This is all just theory anyway.But I doubt the diff universe theory.Its all physical.Which anyone should be able to tell you is just the manifestation of what was in GODs mind.We are all individuals not parts of GOD for GOD is cannot be divided.Points in timie,time which is not forever.Time which has a beginning &end.
@norluan Quit with these pointless questions? I'm going to be a hypocrite anyway and ask you where god came from. And don't give me any bullshit answers! It's easier to save a step and say that the universe always existed. The universe is also not an intelligent creature so it's very possible and more logical that the big bang could be wrong and that our universe doesn't need a cause.
This female voice, along with the accompanying music, reminds me of the first scene in "The Fellowship of the Ring", when the history Sauron's ring is told.
I didn't mean to come off as condescending in my reply. what I meant to point out is that, although the general direction of your inquiry was sound and would indeed raise some very interesting questions about causation (something from nothing) in conjunction with physical theories about the origin and laws of the universe, you seem to have a lack of full understanding of the implications of such physical theories and thus you would be unable to successfully apply those theories to your question
Astrophysicist Paul Davies said if the Big Bang was something that had only happened once, it is beyond science. I think if M-theory or string-theory are shown to be true, they are also beyond science. We may be able to explain our own universe's existence but never the origins of the super strings. What are they made of, how, etc? Never ending questions.
I have my own theory. That the 'Big Bang' is relative. Everything is moving from the -singularity in the center (aka big bang) tot a +singularity ('edge' of spacetime, not to be taken in a purely spacial sense) in a continuous loop. 'Dark matter' lives beyond the event horizons (from our relative position in space time), not yet having passed through. Explains for me why the universe >seems< to be expanding:) (but is not, distorted p.o.v.). No birth/death of the universe. Alrighty?
@trisky1234 oh by the way, why do you think there is a lightspeed c? by limiting lightspeed, this whole system becomes possible, because it enables the existence of an event horizon, opposed to everything existing at once in 0 space! Instant expansion, in a virtual sense. But Since it's an eternal system, the start probably took place in some kind of other dimension that is of different characteristics than space time.
I like the theory that the universe is gravity. not the gravity between masses but a gravity that existed before the big bang. Gravity before the big band is the closest thing to "nothing" but is not nothing. moving from all directions at infinite speed, when a very slight curve somehow occurs the rest of the gravity falls in on it and cause it to spin, in spinning, the spinning area slows causing friction against the fast flowing gravity then Bang, matter instantly, then repeat for billions yr
@iam jalapeno do you only know what they teach you? how do you know they are right when they only know what is taught them? answer me this, is there any such thing as nothing? how will you prove it? what was that which banged in the "big bang" floating in? nothing?
@fudgedogbannana I really like your approach to the question that is exactly the type of philosophical criticsim that all physical and metaphysical theories should be subjected to. I am a physics major and a philosophy minor and I spend a great deal of time dealing with the theory and mathematics of modern (and ancient) physical theories. (Such as the Standard model of quantum, Quantum field theory, M-Theory, etc.)
@iam jalapeno math ay? 3 men walk into a cheap hotel and say we want a room for a night, clerk says OK $30 so each man pays $10and goes up to the room, 3x$10= $30,the manager says to clerk its only $25 for a room go up and refund $5, clerk takes 5 singles on the way up he says how will I divide $5 to 3 men? I'll make it easy on myself, I'll give them $1 each and keep $2 for myself. Now each of the 3 men payed $9 after $1 refund, 9x3=27, clerk pocketed $2, 27+2=29, where is the 30th dollar?
@fudgedogbannana You are assuming incorrect values in the problem. The total amount of money passed between parties is $35. The 3x$10 from each man and the $5 singles from the clerk. No money is missing. They each paid $10, then each received a $1 refund amounting to $33 total in transactions (30+3 not 30-3) The remaining $2 of the total money went to the pocket of the clerk yielding a total of $35 in transactions. I don't see the point in your post at all.
The idea that one universe could be identical to another except for some random change seems impossible. That random change couldn't be explained by physics... I don't think.
Unproven philosophy it may be, M-brane theory still has the power of mathematics behind it. Meaning its far more likely to be true than any silly bronze age fairy tale from the Bible or any other laughable holy book.
If u religious thinkers claim god is eternal why not just skip the god process and say the universe is eternal. No one says the big bang was a creation of our world, only an expansion of space time
None the less, the big bang is a far more rational answer than the fairy tale of the magical tree, the magical fruit, the talking snake, and the three little pigs
There is a point on the rational evolution where one must go trough a mirror. This mirror is a door to the world of possibilies, the world of the abstract and it's required an act of blind faith to find the exit that will allow one to re-join the path of rational evolution again.
We would conclude from the law of cause-and-effect that the First Cause of all things must be an infinite, eternal, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being!
Surely the infinite, eternal, omnipresent, omiscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being needs an infinite, eternal, omnipresent, omiscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being to create it.
Using your theory that is. :)
Worshipping a sky pixie is an indicator of a backwards non thinking lame brained idiot.
So, puzzle solved. Where did our universe come from? Colliding parallel universes? It came into existence when the ripples from other branes banged into each other?
So where did these other branes and other parallel universes come from? All that has been done is to move the puzzle back one hypothetical step. Nothing is solved. One more example of intellectual mental masterbation
3D is it. Jeez. Chill you aint smarter than anyone lol. if its smaller then it has 3D. LOL. These people need to know the truth about our world and universe....read the bible.
@fistepot no, I think science is learning the design of what God created. Never ending discoveries...how awesome is GOD?! All these things were meant to be discovered. The more I watch scientist explain their theories, it just amazes me how complex our world and universe is. Maybe I am contradicting myself, but im OK with myself and try to learn everyday and be happy with life and how it is. If im wrong at least I tried to do good.
@dmartinez1982 how are you doing anybody good with the bible?? Science isnt learning about any design, but they are learning about the prossess of the universe. Religion dont want scientist to discover the truth, and the reason is logical ( from a religious viewpoint that is) The religious organisations have to change their very foundations because of sience. THAT should be enough to see through the lies. Im not being disrespectful, just honest.
@fistepot True, but you probably havent read the Bible. Read it and think about it. How can something come from nothing? even a scientist knows that is impossible. This is beyond anything we can fathom. I love how God made it that way. He gave us freedom of choice. believe it or no t but I think he meant for people to doubt him.
@dmartinez1982 You are forgetting a major brick in the puzzle here. SOME scientist say that the universe came from nothing, but nobody knows for sure yet, we simply dont know what triggered the big bang. But even tough we dont know, it does not mean that the possiblility for God is any larger, in fact we have already found out that life dont need a creator, so why would the universe need a creator? Think about it..
@dmartinez1982 Another ting. Why would reading the bible change anything? what about the Qur'an? If i am hoping to find answers in any religius books, why not the Qur'an? What is seperating the 2 books? Wish you would see ( for you own sake) that religions is only based on power. personal beliefs dont need power to sustain itself. If god is good, he dont care about what you believe in, why would a all knowing beeing care for something that petty?
@Cinnarbar thats on you. I dont mind and maybe God wont mind either cuz he doesnt leave us much scientific proof. But hey, I just have faith and if you dont thats cool too. thats your belief
When the Cern collider is at full strength they will try to smash particles to determine if energy through "gravitons" is lost. If it is, it would be the first "possible" evidence of the existence of a parallel universe.
That last statement can't be true. Yes the number of universes will be incredibly great. but there cant be an infinite amount of universes because there cannot be an infinite amount of styles of universes. Unless we have duplicate universes which in that case we have an infinite amount of duplicates... It's a never ending cycle which, for once in physics, won't make sense.
Even if we accept Niel Turok's idea that the unverse was created by a collison between two branes that does not solve the problem of an infinte regress. This could have been the trillionth trillonth universe to have ever existed and there would still have to be something to end the infinte regress and have always existed.
yeah so they are theorizing we are not the first demension created....probably like #1 million is us. So...in theory...there has been 1 million copies of me...heh. creepy....
also- in theory, if your relgious, could say...God got bored...and we WERE...lol
Wow... narration in this show is horrid. Written in the most infantile way, and the choice of visuals is absolutely atrocious. The only people in this thing that make any kind of sense, oddly enough, are the scientists. Pile of crap, thank you.
@poorinreign we know the universe is really jello, membranes, ripples, brains, strings blah balh that the cookie monster barfed out from a tiny point of nothing 13 billion years ago when he was hanging out in the 11th dimension. oh yeaah we found out we can't prove whatever we said happened but.... don't question THE big bang... weirdos. that's not science or religion or even too much cartoon network, they're on drugs.
@ZeroHumans You need to question "EVERYTHING" until "EVERYTHING" links together. If we do not then we will be limiting our knowledge of mainly just the basics. Do you want this??? Do you want an end?? Religion is where people create an end, but science will never end so you "HAVE" to question THE BIG BANG THEORY, or else we will never find the answers we want.
to clarify all of this. with the addition of the 11th dimension, the superstring changes into a membrane. this membrane has many different ways of splitting and reforming, but the main thing to remember is that these membranes are parallel universes that exist in this 11 dimensional multiverse (in which our universe exists). so, in effect, our entire universe is just an expanded string of energy in the 11th dimension.
You know what I think guys. I believe the M Brain is the wave of water.. When water waves coiled in to each other they create mass of energy that transfers our universe in to the Big Bag not only ours but also other universes.
Since we know that the universe came from H20 and so forth on that the energy can only be found from water.
I am not no scholar or anything but you know people just think different and sometimes one can be wrong and another can be right..
Water is a element. Elements are atoms that are determined by how many protons, neutrons, and so forth are in and around a nucleus. So, no... H20 is a bi product of the big bang.
@truvelocity you have a stronge prove on that. but I never said the h20 water that we know of..
I believe this water is a different type of water that gives the universe more universe than we think of as while some of them exist in parella dimensions
@lilsj206 Water is a byproduct of star formation. There were no atoms during the formation of the universe.
Vibrational energy separates parallel universes right next to us. These vibrational walls (called membranes from M theory or branes for short) bump into each other. This bumping is perceived as a Big Bang to us.
Like 2 dimensional beings think a 3 dimensional object changes shape as it passes through but, they can't perceive the 3rd dimension. They see the effect passing through.
@truvelocity correct the vibrational energy must be a liquid not made of atoms.. I still hold a brain to be a special type of liquid water not made by atoms we know of..
@lilsj206 Well, Earthquakes look a lot like liquid when viewed from space. The ripples on the solid rock move like water. You see, what makes atoms are strings, vibtational energy holding the dimensions as we know it, together. The larger strings, which stretch out are called membranes, or branes for short. Just vibrational energy that follow a mathematical behavior by inadvertently separating universes right in front of our noses, we can't see. They ripple, but its not liquid.
@truvelocity to your understanding it might be a vibrational energy I still think it's waving liquid that is some what not proven yet in mathematics. Theory is just a theory at the end of the day. Even the idea of string theory is still shaking on it's feet it might be something or might just be wast of time after all this years.
Just know nothing in the universe can't come to existence with out a matter time and space it's self s matter so is the vibrational energy string
Physicists have a sophisticated understanding of a very complicated subject with a huge learning curve that takes decades. You saw what looks like water to illustrate it to laymen on this vlog... and now that image is in your head. M theory has proven that a particle can be in two places at once no matter the distance, that the nuclei of atoms constantly pop in and out of existence, just like thoughts. All testable agreeable equations with physicists. Either something is true or not.
@lilsj206 I've been thinking this for years, and we are- our ingredients, water and light (elements coming from a star, type energy). So if there are just two universes in the end I think that would be interesting and follow the diagram we are familiar with for procreation I believe water and light have their own cellular memory of being from what they were originally (down to string like memory) and also possibly again, water and light are just parts of another huger universe or two..:)fun
Love this stuff. It opens our eyes to a possibility that we are not alone, we are not the only ones and existence is far more interesting that the shit that is on tv, magazines. Lets read and explore this stuff instead. Better for the brain, better for your soul.
i dont think any human being will ever solve this problem, it has taken us millions of years to get to this point and i dont think humans will survive too long to get the right explaination the way we going. i m gona get me some bread now and stop stressing:) there is NO ANSWER
@zaktive So are we the product of a black hole from a different universe.
If energy and matter are the same then...
And/If all matter/time/light is sucked into a black hole, then could the BIG BANG just be a landfill site?
Just like we fill a trash bag at 1 location, knowing its contents will spew out at another location, are we the wrong side of a Black Hole? Or just tell me how stupid im an idiot
The m-theory actually makes the most sense to me. But, there are problems with this. It explains what happened before our universe was here and why it's here, but it does not even begin to explain what these membranes are moving UPON nor what created them in the first place. Why can't we see beyond our membrane? Would there be some type of distinct difference between the space-time of our universe and the plane on which these membranes are moving upon?
@matisamd Well, sliced bread wasn't all that great, due to it's effect on bread. If sliced before it is ready to be eaten, bread will only go bad faster.
why are we waiting wares the graviton that there supposed to be making ? this is just how we understand it now it onkly looks like were near the end because we cant see round corners ;)
You summed it up perfectly with that saying. I thought the same thing straight away. But no scientist would say such a thing. Pride prevents conventional scientists from admitting there is anything they cannot understand. Your quotation actually comes from J. B. S. Haldane, who was an English Biologist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
even if all the atoms in the universe were to be compressed into a single solid it would be bigger then that although you cant brake atoms or fuse them together. thats the bad thing. what happened b4 the big bang theory what awas on the other side. if there was something before the big bang theory what came before that and that,so on. theorfor some can suspect a supernatural cause bieng at work in which case god. therfore god is a good reasonable answer. yet religeon sometimes defies itself
fromt here the various forces we observe may have evolved. infinity being comprised of course of all time and all matter, ever, in the whole universe, supposedly endless.
what if, from nought, one quantum of energy was created, essentially jumping from zero to one. The balance of nonexistence would be trhown off and the bounce-back from 0-1 may well be 0 to infinity, considereing that nothing had previously existed. the original quantum of energy could be dividisble to space-time, though neither eistsed, and in the transfer from one to infinity,
I agree. The other thing is that when we come to "test" things - how can we? We are in the "test". You would probably need to be 'outside looking in' to be able to test or even come close to proving half these theories.
@vessmore Answer to you're questions. It's irrelevant, because since each of them can do one, they can have these physical phenomena explained to them. We know through different methods of testing that the electron exists in some form, even though we lack physical capacity to actually see them with our eyes. while it may be possible that we lack a brain mechanism that makes us unable to understand the universe fully, our ability to predict events in it means we should at least keep trying.
@vessmore have you ever thought about the other 89% of brain they say we don't use? Did you know brain operate in difererent frequencies? Is not Voodoo, not squizo mysticism, is science. Have you ever been taught to have control of your mind processes in its different states of conciousness? Have you ever been taugh to put yourself in the same mental state you do when you are dreaming to transcend space and time, just like you do in your dreams, but in a self-controlled way?
@vessmore Have you ever thought about Ludwig Van Beethoven? he got depth but kept composing. I think is better to wait than to deny something we don't understand yet.
@vessmore are hardware can be manipulated to work.. its just how we are raised, this is how things work, thats it! the brains an amazing thing, if we weren't raised with such *Stopping Blocks* we would be way more advanced in everything..
Sounds like they're on to something which brought about our state of being in a material world, but may refuse a more religious possibility somewhat that there is a state of being higher than what we are in from which our current existence occured that may multiply into infinite "universes" as they call it. They never quite explained everything, they pretty much gave a generality of it all. Therefore it's hard to determine anything past what I've said.
where are this parallel universe came from? so after the big bang it stops from there ? no more big bang now? after that and after that? are we the only big bang? before the big bang what is evrything? i supposed its not empty but where are those things came from before the big bang? even being empty is something otherwise you cannot count 1 if you know the empty or the nothingness but where are they came from?
there is another theory out there. they're trying to find out if "everything" obeys 1 law (unified theory) where the universe is constantly banging (lol) and constantly turning back into a singularity. right now somewhere out there our universe died, but elsewhere it's being banged out again. (again lol at bang) but seriously.
i sure hope there's other life out there... i wanna marry a pink hair girl from another world... or if not, somewhere in this world... xD any takers?
There are very reputable scientists and not a few otherwise intelligent humans who do NOT believe there was any Big Bang. At least 80% of the "Doppler" redshift which is used to infer receding and accelerating galactic motion turns out to have solid evidence of other sources of light reddening. Even the Pound Rebka experiment which "proved" gravitational and Doppler redshift is based on the inference of redshift with a lower gravitational state. The MM experiment showed no such shift.
I'm whole heartily agreeing with the last few statements made, I see not only our species, not only our universe but near infinite collections of universes being like tiny grains of sand on a beach and this beach stretches forever and if it does end there will be an ocean after.
Endless life forms trying to solve the mysteries of their own worlds, something out there is drawing us, hypothesizing creatures with spines and who stand straight. Not knowing countless others are doing the same thing.
Tough to go into length on a utube remark, but... as I explained below, Einstein's equations were a drastic screwup, those who catch on are drummed out of the biz, even many prominent scientists. For sound, yes, for light, NO, no Doppler effect, therefore no Big Bang. The observed "redshift" is NOT due to Doppler effect and the best evidence does show that. IOW, NO expanding Universe, NO Big Bang, and galaxies are in a state of flux, that's all
Yes I know for sure that that is one of the loop hole, but the big bang theory is the only supported theory expansion of the universe. cosmic microwave background radiation, galactic evolution, measured abundances those are the support , yes I know that it has a few loophole, but it's the only theory that has some solid evidence.
Loophole? Ok, the once common perception that the earth was totally flat is relatively sane compared to the notion of a big bang - did I say this before? The BB hinges on Doppler as the source of redshift, meaning galaxes moving apart... but 1) more and more data disprove the Doppler notion and 2) and this is fact, not theory, the entire relativity and redshift paradigm rests on the same falsehoods. Btw, Einstein borrowed everything from others... he was a fraud and relativity is a hoax...
Ok, if you want these contradictions properly demonstrated, I'm going to be doing a series of comments at another vid, and, yes, I can fix the errors in the math, but can't be sure how this "challenge" will turn out. If anyone wants to see me explain this, or hope that I make a fool of myself, stay tuned to the vid "Is Time Travel Possible?" I made the 1st comment for this about 15 hours ago, give me another sx hours for the next, it may take several days for this...
I said I know the redshift is one of the problems with the big bang, I know that. The Doppler effect has no evidence against it, sound expanding on a point of view is fairly simple. The equation came after the discovery that the universe was expanding. The equation are only theory, but before these equation, people observe and notice the universe expanding. Redshift occurs because of electromagnetic radiation, this is basic, and is use to find distance and speed of things in space.
Michio Kaku for president!
Lightsleeper92 1 month ago
Michio Kaku for president.
Lightsleeper92 1 month ago
math > the bible ... reality > bullshit
ryansling 2 months ago
can we finally get rid of bullshit religion now? please, pretty please.... iif any higher power exists I can guarantee it's nothing. like the ahole the bible is about... grow up...
ryansling 2 months ago
"science philosophy"?
RzaChess 3 months ago
@RzaChess Aye, it's properly known as "theoretical physics". The math is generally rigorously reviewed; but that takes us only so far. We lack the tools (currently!) to make observations, in regards to many of the propositions, for proper empirical falsifiability.
basmithtx 1 month ago
It may be scientific philosophy as of yet. But still, thinking beyond the borders and speculation is and will always be a vital part of science
ByabyaChannel 5 months ago
In other realities we are ALL immortal, Universe ruling, God pleasure beings near infinite times over. Yep, I like that theory. That said, in an almost infinite number we are living existences of extreme misery, far worse than anything we could Humanly conceive. This crude example, when we try & take in the infinite realms & bear in mind a possible level of interconnectedness between the Multiverse, perhaps this hints at reasons as to our occasionsal feelings of fragility and sheer awe at being?
andy7666 6 months ago
my fart is bigger explosion than the big bang lol.. whats the big deal?
tubedude709 6 months ago
@tubedude709 You sound ignorant.
85zeitgeist 6 months ago
@85zeitgeist if first particles was formed about 400 000 years afther the big bang what was there when the big bang happened? nothing..
tubedude709 6 months ago
@tubedude709
all particles were formed at the moment of the BB, after 400 000 years the Universe became opaque enough for radiation to spread, creating the Cosmic Background radiation which we can detect.
Zorgonia 5 months ago in playlist String Theory
LOL @ the ammount of people on here thinking that parallel universes would have them on it but different...this is science, not the fuckin twilight zone...by parallel they mean side by side
ItsKnucklez 7 months ago
@ItsKnucklez Well I'm glad we have such steadfast beacons of knowledge as yourself to look toward! Humans know bugger all in the scheme of things, so "LOL" at you! :) Our greatest scientific minds know next to nothing about the true workings of the Universe - these are questions akin to "Does God exist?" - don't get too cocky about the little we DO know!
andy7666 6 months ago
@andy7666 If science knew how everything worked, we wouldn't need it anymore... I know science doesn't have all the answers, if it did, it wouldn't be science. Like the fact that most of the universe is made of dark matter, but they don't know what dark matter IS, but they are working on it. You missed my point, I was simply laughing at people not knowing what "parallel" means.
ItsKnucklez 6 months ago
M theory... the greatest thing since bread came sliced
Borat911 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question, is there such a thing as "random"?
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
Canadian2 7 months ago
People would just start calling this membrane GOD, back in the same place.
UtopiaMinor666 8 months ago
FallofDarkness wrote "from primeval science to modern science...I've done heavy research on M-theory and understand all the scientific history behind it."
Considering the theory was only first proposed in 1995 and remains completely untestable, your above claim is ridiculous.
Galmozzi99 8 months ago
You shouldn't put numbers on dimensions because it presupposes time and space.
rphcomposer 8 months ago
M theory = Materialist Desperation Theory
Galmozzi99 9 months ago
@Galmozzi99 If you did real research on M-theory and understood the history of it (from primeval science to modern science) maybe you wouldn't regard M-theory as a desperate attempt to explain everything. I've done heavy research on M-theory and understand all the scientific history behind it. So from my point of view you're being willfully ignorant!
FallofDarkness55 8 months ago
Funny how all of these types of videos make me believe in the existence of GOD more.
iwanttocrashmybike 9 months ago
@iwanttocrashmybike M-theory makes god unnecessary! End of Story!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 String like a rope.That has been threaded.This is all just theory anyway.But I doubt the diff universe theory.Its all physical.Which anyone should be able to tell you is just the manifestation of what was in GODs mind.We are all individuals not parts of GOD for GOD is cannot be divided.Points in timie,time which is not forever.Time which has a beginning &end.
iwanttocrashmybike 9 months ago
@iwanttocrashmybike y u say that??
jmacisdope2 7 months ago
so where did the parallel universes come from?
norluan 9 months ago
@norluan Quit with these pointless questions? I'm going to be a hypocrite anyway and ask you where god came from. And don't give me any bullshit answers! It's easier to save a step and say that the universe always existed. The universe is also not an intelligent creature so it's very possible and more logical that the big bang could be wrong and that our universe doesn't need a cause.
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 Have you read the seth material by jane roberts. Theres a pretty interesting explanation in there for the god concept.
rphcomposer 8 months ago
Lol, i hate the fact that infinity divided by anything is still an infinity:/ it soo disturbing:P
sup3rt0aster 10 months ago
M-theory is sexy. Physicists explaining it in pedophile glasses are not.
We need to set up a fund to get them some sexy eyewear.
insektl0gic 10 months ago
Just came back from a trip to the 12th dimension and a guy there explained me ALL there is to know!
frankherman3 1 year ago
The 11th dimension in the video sounds real rumbly. Don't make no sense. If it's as small as they say, ought to sound real squeaky.
TaterGumfries 1 year ago
This female voice, along with the accompanying music, reminds me of the first scene in "The Fellowship of the Ring", when the history Sauron's ring is told.
EuroUser1 1 year ago
I didn't mean to come off as condescending in my reply. what I meant to point out is that, although the general direction of your inquiry was sound and would indeed raise some very interesting questions about causation (something from nothing) in conjunction with physical theories about the origin and laws of the universe, you seem to have a lack of full understanding of the implications of such physical theories and thus you would be unable to successfully apply those theories to your question
iamjalapeno 1 year ago
"It doesn't tell us what banged, why it banged..."
Giggidy :-)
MrPVP21 1 year ago
@MrPVP21 Conscious pure energy banged. It learned how to create
Alright gigiddy gigiddy gu
rphcomposer 8 months ago
Where do Branes come from?
Penndennis 1 year ago
This video will explain all of the mistery of the big band and where the matter in our universe came from.
gaynorglowellxsingh 1 year ago
Michio Kaku is on like every program ever aired with something to do with science. I see that guy everywhere, he;s awesome lol
BrokenBook 1 year ago
Astrophysicist Paul Davies said if the Big Bang was something that had only happened once, it is beyond science. I think if M-theory or string-theory are shown to be true, they are also beyond science. We may be able to explain our own universe's existence but never the origins of the super strings. What are they made of, how, etc? Never ending questions.
HighCardWins 1 year ago
I have my own theory. That the 'Big Bang' is relative. Everything is moving from the -singularity in the center (aka big bang) tot a +singularity ('edge' of spacetime, not to be taken in a purely spacial sense) in a continuous loop. 'Dark matter' lives beyond the event horizons (from our relative position in space time), not yet having passed through. Explains for me why the universe >seems< to be expanding:) (but is not, distorted p.o.v.). No birth/death of the universe. Alrighty?
trisky1234 1 year ago
@trisky1234 oh by the way, why do you think there is a lightspeed c? by limiting lightspeed, this whole system becomes possible, because it enables the existence of an event horizon, opposed to everything existing at once in 0 space! Instant expansion, in a virtual sense. But Since it's an eternal system, the start probably took place in some kind of other dimension that is of different characteristics than space time.
trisky1234 1 year ago
I like the theory that the universe is gravity. not the gravity between masses but a gravity that existed before the big bang. Gravity before the big band is the closest thing to "nothing" but is not nothing. moving from all directions at infinite speed, when a very slight curve somehow occurs the rest of the gravity falls in on it and cause it to spin, in spinning, the spinning area slows causing friction against the fast flowing gravity then Bang, matter instantly, then repeat for billions yr
fudgedogbannana 1 year ago
@fudgedogbannana wow you have no understanding whatsoever of the principles and concepts of physics in general.
iamjalapeno 1 year ago
@iam jalapeno do you only know what they teach you? how do you know they are right when they only know what is taught them? answer me this, is there any such thing as nothing? how will you prove it? what was that which banged in the "big bang" floating in? nothing?
fudgedogbannana 1 year ago
@fudgedogbannana I really like your approach to the question that is exactly the type of philosophical criticsim that all physical and metaphysical theories should be subjected to. I am a physics major and a philosophy minor and I spend a great deal of time dealing with the theory and mathematics of modern (and ancient) physical theories. (Such as the Standard model of quantum, Quantum field theory, M-Theory, etc.)
iamjalapeno 1 year ago
@iam jalapeno math ay? 3 men walk into a cheap hotel and say we want a room for a night, clerk says OK $30 so each man pays $10and goes up to the room, 3x$10= $30,the manager says to clerk its only $25 for a room go up and refund $5, clerk takes 5 singles on the way up he says how will I divide $5 to 3 men? I'll make it easy on myself, I'll give them $1 each and keep $2 for myself. Now each of the 3 men payed $9 after $1 refund, 9x3=27, clerk pocketed $2, 27+2=29, where is the 30th dollar?
fudgedogbannana 1 year ago
@fudgedogbannana You are assuming incorrect values in the problem. The total amount of money passed between parties is $35. The 3x$10 from each man and the $5 singles from the clerk. No money is missing. They each paid $10, then each received a $1 refund amounting to $33 total in transactions (30+3 not 30-3) The remaining $2 of the total money went to the pocket of the clerk yielding a total of $35 in transactions. I don't see the point in your post at all.
iamjalapeno 1 year ago
@fudgedogbannana All your post shows is that you are not able to properly translate word problems (conception) into mathematical equations.
iamjalapeno 1 year ago
all this bullshit has to stop
there was no beginning and there will be no ending time is an illusion all there ever was and will be, is here now
oh and the sun runs on electricty
lukkbox 1 year ago
The idea that one universe could be identical to another except for some random change seems impossible. That random change couldn't be explained by physics... I don't think.
JayBlueToYou 1 year ago
Unproven philosophy it may be, M-brane theory still has the power of mathematics behind it. Meaning its far more likely to be true than any silly bronze age fairy tale from the Bible or any other laughable holy book.
God's gap just got very very small indeed.
johnycannuk 1 year ago
how can something come from nothing???
themightyQ77 1 year ago
@themightyQ77 Yes...look up Lawrence Krause's excellent video lecture on the subject.
johnycannuk 1 year ago
ok wow wtf. fuck you creationist gtf off this video and leave us thinking people alone.
codymovies 1 year ago
I wounder if another universe Im a girl? Id tap that...
DefiantProductions 1 year ago 31
@DefiantProductions
what if you make an ugly girl?
desichick 1 year ago
@desichick so be it. ill put a paper bag over my own girl face
DefiantProductions 1 year ago
@DefiantProductions, you missed an excellent opportunity to use a "bang" pun there.
CodyRicheson 1 year ago
@DefiantProductions i woodnt id loike sumone that kan spel lol' Ever hear of something called spell check? :)
MrLesbg1982 8 months ago
@DefiantProductions what if you end up looking like king kong or something
solrac2370 7 months ago
@DefiantProductions hahahahah now you talking man(woman)
GodlessMartyr666 5 days ago
Anything must be created nothing comes from nothing!
END OF STORY THE KNOW NOTHING THATS ALL.
DONT LET TO BE BRAINWASHED !
BasshuterZ 1 year ago
@BasshuterZ Look up a Quark.
kamahi 1 year ago
If u religious thinkers claim god is eternal why not just skip the god process and say the universe is eternal. No one says the big bang was a creation of our world, only an expansion of space time
mountainmanbear 1 year ago 6
@mountainmanbear
None the less, the big bang is a far more rational answer than the fairy tale of the magical tree, the magical fruit, the talking snake, and the three little pigs
SexyArcanine666 9 months ago
There is a point on the rational evolution where one must go trough a mirror. This mirror is a door to the world of possibilies, the world of the abstract and it's required an act of blind faith to find the exit that will allow one to re-join the path of rational evolution again.
NomenLog 1 year ago
The First Cause of limitless space must be infinite.
The First Cause of endless time must be eternal.
The First Cause of boundless energy must be omnipotent.
The First Cause of universal interrelationships must be omnipresent.
The First Cause of infinite complexity must be omniscient.
purpleleach1 1 year ago 2
@purpleleach1 So imperfection implies evolution.
In perfection there is no movement.
What it is, has a singular intention of being.
When all is divided the intention remains the same.
The intention of being and its own demonstration.
NomenLog 1 year ago
The First Cause of spiritual values must be spiritual.
The First Cause of human responsibility must be volitional.
The First Cause of human integrity must be truthful.
The First Cause of human love must be loving.
The First Cause of life must be living.
purpleleach1 1 year ago
We would conclude from the law of cause-and-effect that the First Cause of all things must be an infinite, eternal, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being!
purpleleach1 1 year ago
@purpleleach1
Surely the infinite, eternal, omnipresent, omiscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being needs an infinite, eternal, omnipresent, omiscient, spiritual, volitional, truthful, loving, living Being to create it.
Using your theory that is. :)
Worshipping a sky pixie is an indicator of a backwards non thinking lame brained idiot.
1878EFC2008 1 year ago
So, puzzle solved. Where did our universe come from? Colliding parallel universes? It came into existence when the ripples from other branes banged into each other?
So where did these other branes and other parallel universes come from? All that has been done is to move the puzzle back one hypothetical step. Nothing is solved. One more example of intellectual mental masterbation
Puck2442 1 year ago
that song at the beginning was fuckin sick. wat was that
ggallin500 1 year ago
3D is it. Jeez. Chill you aint smarter than anyone lol. if its smaller then it has 3D. LOL. These people need to know the truth about our world and universe....read the bible.
dmartinez1982 1 year ago
@dmartinez1982 Tought you said these people need to know the truth, and you want them to read the bible? isnt that a contradiction?
fistepot 1 year ago
@fistepot no, I think science is learning the design of what God created. Never ending discoveries...how awesome is GOD?! All these things were meant to be discovered. The more I watch scientist explain their theories, it just amazes me how complex our world and universe is. Maybe I am contradicting myself, but im OK with myself and try to learn everyday and be happy with life and how it is. If im wrong at least I tried to do good.
dmartinez1982 1 year ago
@dmartinez1982 how are you doing anybody good with the bible?? Science isnt learning about any design, but they are learning about the prossess of the universe. Religion dont want scientist to discover the truth, and the reason is logical ( from a religious viewpoint that is) The religious organisations have to change their very foundations because of sience. THAT should be enough to see through the lies. Im not being disrespectful, just honest.
fistepot 1 year ago
@fistepot True, but you probably havent read the Bible. Read it and think about it. How can something come from nothing? even a scientist knows that is impossible. This is beyond anything we can fathom. I love how God made it that way. He gave us freedom of choice. believe it or no t but I think he meant for people to doubt him.
dmartinez1982 1 year ago
@dmartinez1982 You are forgetting a major brick in the puzzle here. SOME scientist say that the universe came from nothing, but nobody knows for sure yet, we simply dont know what triggered the big bang. But even tough we dont know, it does not mean that the possiblility for God is any larger, in fact we have already found out that life dont need a creator, so why would the universe need a creator? Think about it..
fistepot 1 year ago
@dmartinez1982 Another ting. Why would reading the bible change anything? what about the Qur'an? If i am hoping to find answers in any religius books, why not the Qur'an? What is seperating the 2 books? Wish you would see ( for you own sake) that religions is only based on power. personal beliefs dont need power to sustain itself. If god is good, he dont care about what you believe in, why would a all knowing beeing care for something that petty?
fistepot 1 year ago
@dmartinez1982 The day I'll start beleiving in god is the day your able to divide by zero.
Cinnarbar 1 year ago
@Cinnarbar thats on you. I dont mind and maybe God wont mind either cuz he doesnt leave us much scientific proof. But hey, I just have faith and if you dont thats cool too. thats your belief
dmartinez1982 1 year ago
When the Cern collider is at full strength they will try to smash particles to determine if energy through "gravitons" is lost. If it is, it would be the first "possible" evidence of the existence of a parallel universe.
evoman1776 1 year ago
There are possible observations.
PencilsAreAwesome 1 year ago
That last statement can't be true. Yes the number of universes will be incredibly great. but there cant be an infinite amount of universes because there cannot be an infinite amount of styles of universes. Unless we have duplicate universes which in that case we have an infinite amount of duplicates... It's a never ending cycle which, for once in physics, won't make sense.
ninjajason202 1 year ago
what banged... why it banged... ? lmaooo ! but true
Tystatz 1 year ago
What if the universe increases in dimension???
Before the big it would obviosly be 0D (a single dot)
Now where in 3D!
Its a crap idea I know
SWIFTartz 1 year ago
im glad to see from the comments that ppl aint falling for this.
IANC4EVER 1 year ago
Even if we accept Niel Turok's idea that the unverse was created by a collison between two branes that does not solve the problem of an infinte regress. This could have been the trillionth trillonth universe to have ever existed and there would still have to be something to end the infinte regress and have always existed.
Keysteeze 1 year ago
yeah so they are theorizing we are not the first demension created....probably like #1 million is us. So...in theory...there has been 1 million copies of me...heh. creepy....
also- in theory, if your relgious, could say...God got bored...and we WERE...lol
theclash24 1 year ago
Heaven and hell collides! War and peace, love and hate - this explains it all :D
PeonProduction 1 year ago
So what created the bread?...gee this keeps going on....
tsonukarabocado 1 year ago
@tsonukarabocado
Humans created bread. :P
LordTyrannus 1 year ago
@tsonukarabocado right..there had to be an ETERNAL first cause
jmacisdope2 7 months ago
@jmacisdope2 I'm an atheist...
tsonukarabocado 7 months ago
@tsonukarabocado ok anndd??..
jmacisdope2 7 months ago
@jmacisdope2 Nothing, bye.
tsonukarabocado 7 months ago
@tsonukarabocado lol ok bye
jmacisdope2 7 months ago
Wow... narration in this show is horrid. Written in the most infantile way, and the choice of visuals is absolutely atrocious. The only people in this thing that make any kind of sense, oddly enough, are the scientists. Pile of crap, thank you.
poorinreign 1 year ago
@poorinreign we know the universe is really jello, membranes, ripples, brains, strings blah balh that the cookie monster barfed out from a tiny point of nothing 13 billion years ago when he was hanging out in the 11th dimension. oh yeaah we found out we can't prove whatever we said happened but.... don't question THE big bang... weirdos. that's not science or religion or even too much cartoon network, they're on drugs.
ZeroHumans 1 year ago
@ZeroHumans You need to question "EVERYTHING" until "EVERYTHING" links together. If we do not then we will be limiting our knowledge of mainly just the basics. Do you want this??? Do you want an end?? Religion is where people create an end, but science will never end so you "HAVE" to question THE BIG BANG THEORY, or else we will never find the answers we want.
ninjajason202 1 year ago
The answer to the title of this video is:
1. Thinking about baseball
2. Thinking about my 3rd grade teacher
3. Strong desire to take a nap.
starstarstar42 1 year ago 2
answer to the question how universe came to be will always be like light, no matter how many question we answer they would always be a little gap.
longdragon3 1 year ago
amazing!
starlogic99 1 year ago
to clarify all of this. with the addition of the 11th dimension, the superstring changes into a membrane. this membrane has many different ways of splitting and reforming, but the main thing to remember is that these membranes are parallel universes that exist in this 11 dimensional multiverse (in which our universe exists). so, in effect, our entire universe is just an expanded string of energy in the 11th dimension.
infinitenight2093 1 year ago
You know what I think guys. I believe the M Brain is the wave of water.. When water waves coiled in to each other they create mass of energy that transfers our universe in to the Big Bag not only ours but also other universes.
Since we know that the universe came from H20 and so forth on that the energy can only be found from water.
I am not no scholar or anything but you know people just think different and sometimes one can be wrong and another can be right..
lilsj206 1 year ago
Water is a element. Elements are atoms that are determined by how many protons, neutrons, and so forth are in and around a nucleus. So, no... H20 is a bi product of the big bang.
truvelocity 1 year ago
@truvelocity you have a stronge prove on that. but I never said the h20 water that we know of..
I believe this water is a different type of water that gives the universe more universe than we think of as while some of them exist in parella dimensions
lilsj206 1 year ago
@lilsj206 Water is a byproduct of star formation. There were no atoms during the formation of the universe.
Vibrational energy separates parallel universes right next to us. These vibrational walls (called membranes from M theory or branes for short) bump into each other. This bumping is perceived as a Big Bang to us.
Like 2 dimensional beings think a 3 dimensional object changes shape as it passes through but, they can't perceive the 3rd dimension. They see the effect passing through.
truvelocity 1 year ago
@truvelocity correct the vibrational energy must be a liquid not made of atoms.. I still hold a brain to be a special type of liquid water not made by atoms we know of..
lilsj206 1 year ago
@lilsj206 Well, Earthquakes look a lot like liquid when viewed from space. The ripples on the solid rock move like water. You see, what makes atoms are strings, vibtational energy holding the dimensions as we know it, together. The larger strings, which stretch out are called membranes, or branes for short. Just vibrational energy that follow a mathematical behavior by inadvertently separating universes right in front of our noses, we can't see. They ripple, but its not liquid.
truvelocity 1 year ago
@truvelocity vibrational energy, sorry for the mis-spell.
truvelocity 1 year ago
@truvelocity to your understanding it might be a vibrational energy I still think it's waving liquid that is some what not proven yet in mathematics. Theory is just a theory at the end of the day. Even the idea of string theory is still shaking on it's feet it might be something or might just be wast of time after all this years.
Just know nothing in the universe can't come to existence with out a matter time and space it's self s matter so is the vibrational energy string
lilsj206 1 year ago
Physicists have a sophisticated understanding of a very complicated subject with a huge learning curve that takes decades. You saw what looks like water to illustrate it to laymen on this vlog... and now that image is in your head. M theory has proven that a particle can be in two places at once no matter the distance, that the nuclei of atoms constantly pop in and out of existence, just like thoughts. All testable agreeable equations with physicists. Either something is true or not.
truvelocity 1 year ago
@lilsj206 I've been thinking this for years, and we are- our ingredients, water and light (elements coming from a star, type energy). So if there are just two universes in the end I think that would be interesting and follow the diagram we are familiar with for procreation I believe water and light have their own cellular memory of being from what they were originally (down to string like memory) and also possibly again, water and light are just parts of another huger universe or two..:)fun
astraification 1 year ago
New thought...
So are we the product of a black hole from a different universe.
If energy and matter are the same then...
And/If all matter/time/light is sucked into a black hole, then could the BIG BANG just be a landfill site?
Just like we fill a trash bag at 1 location, knowing its contents will spew out at another location, are we the wrong side of a Black Hole?
This isnt a joke question so if anyone has any link pls send. Or just tell me how stupid I am.
MrSuperanon2010 1 year ago
Love this stuff. It opens our eyes to a possibility that we are not alone, we are not the only ones and existence is far more interesting that the shit that is on tv, magazines. Lets read and explore this stuff instead. Better for the brain, better for your soul.
AmyK007 1 year ago
i dont think any human being will ever solve this problem, it has taken us millions of years to get to this point and i dont think humans will survive too long to get the right explaination the way we going. i m gona get me some bread now and stop stressing:) there is NO ANSWER
zaktive 2 years ago
@zaktive So are we the product of a black hole from a different universe.
If energy and matter are the same then...
And/If all matter/time/light is sucked into a black hole, then could the BIG BANG just be a landfill site?
Just like we fill a trash bag at 1 location, knowing its contents will spew out at another location, are we the wrong side of a Black Hole? Or just tell me how stupid im an idiot
MrSuperanon2010 1 year ago
Screw my brain! I want to be a physicist now!
MyJimminyCricket 2 years ago
The m-theory actually makes the most sense to me. But, there are problems with this. It explains what happened before our universe was here and why it's here, but it does not even begin to explain what these membranes are moving UPON nor what created them in the first place. Why can't we see beyond our membrane? Would there be some type of distinct difference between the space-time of our universe and the plane on which these membranes are moving upon?
bosscitywhitey 2 years ago
fuck I'm confused!!!!!!!
ThatGuyyyyy 2 years ago
man all you needed to do was show that bread slide and that sentence
ninikolaev 2 years ago 3
M theorry the greatest thing since sliced bread.
matisamd 2 years ago 18
I was going to write exactly the same thing, but then I saw your post!
:-o
LiberdadeHedonista 2 years ago
@matisamd Well, sliced bread wasn't all that great, due to it's effect on bread. If sliced before it is ready to be eaten, bread will only go bad faster.
Kaish3k 1 year ago
@matisamd bang bang bang im sick of this idiotic popular science crap.
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
why are we waiting wares the graviton that there supposed to be making ? this is just how we understand it now it onkly looks like were near the end because we cant see round corners ;)
matisamd 2 years ago
i don't know. alternative universes? that sounds pretty ridiculous. but i guess it still makes more sense than creationism lmfao.
holdenbane 2 years ago 2
I have a solution to the singularity.
MisterMAYA 2 years ago
what is it?!
fermerwuvu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MisterMAYA "I have a solution to the singularity."
Divide by zero, and getting away with it?
Kenzofeis 1 year ago
pokerstaaars
You summed it up perfectly with that saying. I thought the same thing straight away. But no scientist would say such a thing. Pride prevents conventional scientists from admitting there is anything they cannot understand. Your quotation actually comes from J. B. S. Haldane, who was an English Biologist.
TheBrightGrey 2 years ago
I like the idea of endlessnes, it includes the ultimate form of freedom of thinking.
etiennealive 2 years ago
yea..
fermerwuvu 2 years ago
I find this a very good abstract summary of the M-Theory and its take on the Big Bang.
Motarom 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what the fuck? membranes. i say bullshit but this is the first i heard of it so maybe they just explained it bad
MRLfromhell 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
even if all the atoms in the universe were to be compressed into a single solid it would be bigger then that although you cant brake atoms or fuse them together. thats the bad thing. what happened b4 the big bang theory what awas on the other side. if there was something before the big bang theory what came before that and that,so on. theorfor some can suspect a supernatural cause bieng at work in which case god. therfore god is a good reasonable answer. yet religeon sometimes defies itself
Ikickhardcoreass 2 years ago
fromt here the various forces we observe may have evolved. infinity being comprised of course of all time and all matter, ever, in the whole universe, supposedly endless.
shenzomcbobo 2 years ago
what if, from nought, one quantum of energy was created, essentially jumping from zero to one. The balance of nonexistence would be trhown off and the bounce-back from 0-1 may well be 0 to infinity, considereing that nothing had previously existed. the original quantum of energy could be dividisble to space-time, though neither eistsed, and in the transfer from one to infinity,
shenzomcbobo 2 years ago
We will never comprehend the universe in
details because we don't got the right
´hardware' - the brain. Can a blind imagine
what it means to see ? Can a deaf imagine what it means to hear --- i don't think so.
vessmore 2 years ago 7
I agree. The other thing is that when we come to "test" things - how can we? We are in the "test". You would probably need to be 'outside looking in' to be able to test or even come close to proving half these theories.
shagster1970 2 years ago
yep, reminds me one of the scientists who said; "not only is the universe queerer than we suppose, it's queerer than we CAN suppose"
pokerstaaars 2 years ago
@vessmore Answer to you're questions. It's irrelevant, because since each of them can do one, they can have these physical phenomena explained to them. We know through different methods of testing that the electron exists in some form, even though we lack physical capacity to actually see them with our eyes. while it may be possible that we lack a brain mechanism that makes us unable to understand the universe fully, our ability to predict events in it means we should at least keep trying.
krionis1 1 year ago
@vessmore They can both understand mathematics.
Gareth2Jones 1 year ago
@vessmore nice
dmartinez1982 1 year ago
@vessmore have you ever thought about the other 89% of brain they say we don't use? Did you know brain operate in difererent frequencies? Is not Voodoo, not squizo mysticism, is science. Have you ever been taught to have control of your mind processes in its different states of conciousness? Have you ever been taugh to put yourself in the same mental state you do when you are dreaming to transcend space and time, just like you do in your dreams, but in a self-controlled way?
NomenLog 1 year ago
@vessmore Have you ever thought about Ludwig Van Beethoven? he got depth but kept composing. I think is better to wait than to deny something we don't understand yet.
NomenLog 1 year ago
@vessmore are hardware can be manipulated to work.. its just how we are raised, this is how things work, thats it! the brains an amazing thing, if we weren't raised with such *Stopping Blocks* we would be way more advanced in everything..
gtrmaster2000 1 year ago
Quite the Brain-Trip
quantumOflux 2 years ago
Sounds like they're on to something which brought about our state of being in a material world, but may refuse a more religious possibility somewhat that there is a state of being higher than what we are in from which our current existence occured that may multiply into infinite "universes" as they call it. They never quite explained everything, they pretty much gave a generality of it all. Therefore it's hard to determine anything past what I've said.
Mrmandudeguy24 2 years ago
U say it can not be proven.
But not its wellacceptet??
Bit like saying where the electron is?? (or not)
E=mc2
m= all the matter in our universe, will E then be the membrane??
What i belive is that einstein understod more that he could explain.
holm79 2 years ago
meuh maked me feel a bit no a lot worthless xD
Tobias13666 2 years ago
Can you explain the narration from 6:36 mins to 6:50 mins
0504498238 2 years ago
wow.
anafredd 2 years ago
where are this parallel universe came from? so after the big bang it stops from there ? no more big bang now? after that and after that? are we the only big bang? before the big bang what is evrything? i supposed its not empty but where are those things came from before the big bang? even being empty is something otherwise you cannot count 1 if you know the empty or the nothingness but where are they came from?
magiccaloy1972 2 years ago
there is another theory out there. they're trying to find out if "everything" obeys 1 law (unified theory) where the universe is constantly banging (lol) and constantly turning back into a singularity. right now somewhere out there our universe died, but elsewhere it's being banged out again. (again lol at bang) but seriously.
i sure hope there's other life out there... i wanna marry a pink hair girl from another world... or if not, somewhere in this world... xD any takers?
izlude2 2 years ago
lol i laughed out loud, picturing how you laughed at "constantly banging" while seriously explaining this in real life..
Aethendir 2 years ago
will why where there two paraller universe which calided.?
and if there are more then there is the posibility that thoes universese can calid.
and if that happens then you can image two or more explodion coliding into each other.
anwarj3 2 years ago
and what made the ripples or "parallel universes"
and what was before those parallel universes?
what created them?
19jojo93 2 years ago 4
they have always been there in the eleventh dimension
MrMattgreider 2 years ago
if time was not made by the big bang then what made time?
Ginji989 2 years ago
then what made the big bang?
19jojo93 2 years ago
There are very reputable scientists and not a few otherwise intelligent humans who do NOT believe there was any Big Bang. At least 80% of the "Doppler" redshift which is used to infer receding and accelerating galactic motion turns out to have solid evidence of other sources of light reddening. Even the Pound Rebka experiment which "proved" gravitational and Doppler redshift is based on the inference of redshift with a lower gravitational state. The MM experiment showed no such shift.
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago
it has always been there
mgreider89 2 years ago
light is time as long as there has been light
MrMattgreider 2 years ago 2
I'm whole heartily agreeing with the last few statements made, I see not only our species, not only our universe but near infinite collections of universes being like tiny grains of sand on a beach and this beach stretches forever and if it does end there will be an ocean after.
Endless life forms trying to solve the mysteries of their own worlds, something out there is drawing us, hypothesizing creatures with spines and who stand straight. Not knowing countless others are doing the same thing.
blknge 2 years ago
Tough to go into length on a utube remark, but... as I explained below, Einstein's equations were a drastic screwup, those who catch on are drummed out of the biz, even many prominent scientists. For sound, yes, for light, NO, no Doppler effect, therefore no Big Bang. The observed "redshift" is NOT due to Doppler effect and the best evidence does show that. IOW, NO expanding Universe, NO Big Bang, and galaxies are in a state of flux, that's all
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago
Yes I know for sure that that is one of the loop hole, but the big bang theory is the only supported theory expansion of the universe. cosmic microwave background radiation, galactic evolution, measured abundances those are the support , yes I know that it has a few loophole, but it's the only theory that has some solid evidence.
PhantomT69 2 years ago 2
Loophole? Ok, the once common perception that the earth was totally flat is relatively sane compared to the notion of a big bang - did I say this before? The BB hinges on Doppler as the source of redshift, meaning galaxes moving apart... but 1) more and more data disprove the Doppler notion and 2) and this is fact, not theory, the entire relativity and redshift paradigm rests on the same falsehoods. Btw, Einstein borrowed everything from others... he was a fraud and relativity is a hoax...
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago
Ok, if you want these contradictions properly demonstrated, I'm going to be doing a series of comments at another vid, and, yes, I can fix the errors in the math, but can't be sure how this "challenge" will turn out. If anyone wants to see me explain this, or hope that I make a fool of myself, stay tuned to the vid "Is Time Travel Possible?" I made the 1st comment for this about 15 hours ago, give me another sx hours for the next, it may take several days for this...
cusanusnicolas 2 years ago
I said I know the redshift is one of the problems with the big bang, I know that. The Doppler effect has no evidence against it, sound expanding on a point of view is fairly simple. The equation came after the discovery that the universe was expanding. The equation are only theory, but before these equation, people observe and notice the universe expanding. Redshift occurs because of electromagnetic radiation, this is basic, and is use to find distance and speed of things in space.
PhantomT69 2 years ago