I have spent hours in the traditional college classroom and learned very little. I sit around my computer and watch your videos for 10-15 minutes and I able to understand and solve the problems within minutes. Your videos are excellent, thanks a lot.
hey! im trying to graduate so i can move to Austin and leave Dallas;if that ever happen i buy you a beer on Guadalupe street;thanx for the help Patrick.
i'm in calc 3 right now, and everything my professor says is jibberish. after i watched this....i am in complete awe. YOU ARE AMAZING. if only every math teacher taught like you...
I just finished going through the exact same problem as Example 1 for my homework, and I checked my solutions manual.
The answers in the manual is 4(2xy + y^2)^3 - 3(x^2 + 2xy)t^2. I know what they're doing, but what happened to the "t" in the first half [4(2xy + y^2)^3)]? Or is that a typo?
i went for extra help from my professor with a very thick asian accent. he has explained it to me like 3 times and i never got it. These videos are the best! Thank you for not being like some of the other youtube professors and charging for your lessons. I hate not being able to get answers without either looking really hard or paying like $50. Just wanted to say thank you. You have saved my grade many times.
In my calculus book after it talks about the chain rule it goes on to talk about the general power rule, is that the same thing as this general chain rule?
@MajinAmmaar no, not exactly; i assume you are in first semester calculus, so you are still doing single variable stuff; this has to do with multivariable stuff. technically this applies to what you are doing, but the general power rule is a specific rule versus a general procedure (which this is)
how do you know when to use a partial derivative rather than a regular derivative?
cause on the first example, you used derivative of x in respects to t. but on the second example you used partial of x to u. i hope my question made sense.. o_O hahah
@bfferz in the second example he uses the partial of x to u because x depends on more than one variable, in the first example x only depended upon t so the derivative was used rather than the partial
Your chain rule "trees" are great, and generally it's great to have such a good tutor as yourself available on the internet, it's helped me and my classmates hugely getting through calculus! Greetings from Sweden
I have spent hours in the traditional college classroom and learned very little. I sit around my computer and watch your videos for 10-15 minutes and I able to understand and solve the problems within minutes. Your videos are excellent, thanks a lot.
TheThirdReigh 1 month ago
Really useful and informative. Thank you!
altSt0rm 1 month ago
You are a life saver.
loik345 2 months ago
you should teach at Cornell Man...TAs and teachers here suck p...... for a living~!
Modi2020 2 months ago
hey! im trying to graduate so i can move to Austin and leave Dallas;if that ever happen i buy you a beer on Guadalupe street;thanx for the help Patrick.
jormoria 3 months ago 2
@jormoria that works for me
patrickJMT 3 months ago
come and teach at UTD please!
jormoria 3 months ago
@jormoria dallas? no thanks! : )
patrickJMT 3 months ago
Do you have any videos with optimization problems using partial derivatives? multiple variables calculus.
martmelee 3 months ago
Yes! That's clear. Maybe I was ready for it but you for sure trow light in my life.
I am ashame not to have draw the tree of implicit differentiation by myself :o)
J4e8a16n 3 months ago
i'm in calc 3 right now, and everything my professor says is jibberish. after i watched this....i am in complete awe. YOU ARE AMAZING. if only every math teacher taught like you...
n00dl3head 4 months ago 11
@n00dl3head happy that i could help you a bit : )
patrickJMT 4 months ago
you are amazing
consigliere3333 4 months ago
EPIC.
MaroonMonarch 4 months ago
You did it again man. thanks so much. why do i even go to class
shamefulbeats 6 months ago 4
"partial" look like 2. so wtf?!?! im completely thrown off
milkeatscereal 7 months ago
@milkeatscereal if you are talking about the partial notation, all it is is a weird looking d that is prone to being messed up and looking like a 2.
fcdog555 7 months ago
panic!panic!i have my first calculus exam coming tuesday.thanx patrick for the good work you do
pendolly 7 months ago
Fantastic way of explaining has really helped thanks!
pittbinho 8 months ago
"With respect to u."
NO. Respect to YOU, not me. You are a freaking lifesaver.
Atsuke 8 months ago 6
I like treating each component as a branch. That's a very clear way to think of it.
DavidJHilt 8 months ago
Sharpie = confidence
19collinsjeff 10 months ago 4
THANL YOU SO MUCH! I THOUGHT I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS ALL WROUNG BUT YOU HAVE HELP ME CLEAR THINGS UP ABOUT THIS
abc1236092 10 months ago
would love to see a second order derivative with chain rule!
trickoff 11 months ago
I love you
Schutzstafell 11 months ago
no second orders : (
Q8RedDevil91 1 year ago
@Q8RedDevil91 sorry : (
patrickJMT 1 year ago
thank you for this, my teacher just gives up when the harder problems come around, this video is literally the only way i can learn this!
TheBaseballman1990 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Asian wives waiting **busizz4me.info**
MoniRokse 1 year ago
may god bless your work man, thank you so freaking much man,,, people like you will be paid when u least see it coming
mrayon17 1 year ago
nooooooooo way the second question was the exact question i needed help with, same variables and everything!
Dusevic 1 year ago
@Dusevic magic!
patrickJMT 1 year ago 8
@patrickJMT must be. Thanks for the help!
Dusevic 1 year ago
@Dusevic sometimes you can google the problem u need help with and someone somewhere will have posted a step by step solution!
DeeJayFoodstamp 11 months ago
I just finished going through the exact same problem as Example 1 for my homework, and I checked my solutions manual.
The answers in the manual is 4(2xy + y^2)^3 - 3(x^2 + 2xy)t^2. I know what they're doing, but what happened to the "t" in the first half [4(2xy + y^2)^3)]? Or is that a typo?
shadowfrost91 1 year ago
i went for extra help from my professor with a very thick asian accent. he has explained it to me like 3 times and i never got it. These videos are the best! Thank you for not being like some of the other youtube professors and charging for your lessons. I hate not being able to get answers without either looking really hard or paying like $50. Just wanted to say thank you. You have saved my grade many times.
tcurrsdmaster 1 year ago
In my calculus book after it talks about the chain rule it goes on to talk about the general power rule, is that the same thing as this general chain rule?
MajinAmmaar 1 year ago
@MajinAmmaar no, not exactly; i assume you are in first semester calculus, so you are still doing single variable stuff; this has to do with multivariable stuff. technically this applies to what you are doing, but the general power rule is a specific rule versus a general procedure (which this is)
patrickJMT 1 year ago
you rock big time.
AlternkeaneJunkie 1 year ago
The tutor is so good but only it so narrow screen to see it....
yonatanalemayehu 1 year ago
i just nominated you for the cnn hero of the year award
imjohn007 1 year ago 25
@imjohn007 hahahah, really?! that is funny, and very flattering : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
thanks 4 the lesson.be4 i watch this i didn't know to do this chain rule thing.thanks to u i got it right.i wish u all the best
1453fx 1 year ago
how do you know when to use a partial derivative rather than a regular derivative?
cause on the first example, you used derivative of x in respects to t. but on the second example you used partial of x to u. i hope my question made sense.. o_O hahah
thank you!
bfferz 1 year ago
@bfferz in the second example he uses the partial of x to u because x depends on more than one variable, in the first example x only depended upon t so the derivative was used rather than the partial
commanderkool868 1 year ago
well at least you are doing your share. but if you arent already a professor, you should definitely think about it.
KRDONDUKES13 1 year ago
@KRDONDUKES13 i have no desire to do it
patrickJMT 1 year ago
man i could kiss you! haha in a non gay way ofcourse lol. ur very helpful! thanks man
Loksta112 1 year ago
man i could kiss you! in a non gay way ofcourse lol. your extremelly helpful :). thanks man
Loksta112 1 year ago
hey how come you haven't been nominated for Nobel peace prize award yet
KRDONDUKES13 1 year ago
@KRDONDUKES13 hahahahahaha
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@KRDONDUKES13 i think a couple people did nominate me for 'cnn hero of the year' which is funny to me ; )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
i think you are brilliant and deserve an award for your contributions.
KRDONDUKES13 1 year ago
@KRDONDUKES13 thanks : ) however, there are lots of people out there in the world doing nicer things than me!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Ummm Beginning Of Cal.....T-T i'm gonna blow up......5 day left for the exam
tstc79tt 1 year ago
what if you have x & y functions of two variables for an example x= tsin(q)
an87york 1 year ago
Wonderful job, made my professors scribbles on the board seem like chicken scratch!
Keep up the amazing work!
lanner777 1 year ago
@filmcruiser88 yep
327372 1 year ago
Dude, u r the BEST!!!!! ☺☺☺
clemernitsch 1 year ago
Wow, you are simply the greatest! If only all my professors were as good as teaching as you are.
wlmngtn310 1 year ago
nice marker! you must be thinking a lot!!!
lusixoxo 1 year ago
Your chain rule "trees" are great, and generally it's great to have such a good tutor as yourself available on the internet, it's helped me and my classmates hugely getting through calculus! Greetings from Sweden
johandvkarlsson 1 year ago
great video
i liked it very much
probably cannot forget rest of my life
erAshwanisoni 2 years ago
Wow. This is great!
aroguegurklis 2 years ago 2
Wow. This is great.
aroguegurklis 2 years ago
great!
vabs9211 2 years ago
Hey Patrick, is this going over Calculus 3 or Calculus 1.. I know the chain rule is Calc 1.
Thanks
trese0000 2 years ago
At my university we are doing this in Calculus 4.
Patrick, thank you very much for doing these videos. They help more than you probably think.
tysterr 2 years ago 2
@tysterr wow ur university sucks! this is calc 3.
327372 1 year ago
@327372 I just like the engineering program here. But yes the "general requirements" portion of my university sucks.
tysterr 1 year ago
The chain rule for normal functions is for calculus 1 but this is multivariable calculus (calc. 3 in my U) so its a different chain rule.
harkerhh 1 year ago
5/5. Infinitely easier than every other explanation i've found for this.
Beefstew2011 2 years ago 19
Thank you, thank you... you just made my life soo much easier :)
TheFran90 2 years ago
legend mate, ur a star!!!!
joshhk69 2 years ago
can you just differentiate xy first before differentiating the whole term?isn't it the product rule?im just wondering.
beeboobea 3 years ago
yes, you are just using the product rule in essence
patrickJMT 3 years ago
@patrickJMT : what textbook examples do u use? im guessing james stewart calc
327372 1 year ago
nah, just a normal guy making vids on youtube! glad i could help though : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago
waht is dis Advanced math??
forzofdahorse 3 years ago
no, it is only the beginning of calculus
patrickJMT 3 years ago
is this really the beginning of calc? because it so, that's amazing.
eggrollXXXM 3 years ago
Well it's obviously not English, which you clearly fail at :\
Emphasec 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haa.. are you talking to me or sumone else???
forzofdahorse 2 years ago
@forzofdahorse: calculus 3
327372 1 year ago
it makes me not feel like such a loser to know that 1603 people have already viewed this video
xylokid4 3 years ago
ha, why would trying to understand something make you a loser? : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Thanks very much fo the lesson!!!!!
saradani79 3 years ago